[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"lawyer-47":396,"lawyer-news-by-47":471},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":445},{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":402,"branchId":35,"categoryId":35,"avatar":403,"content":404,"sort":405,"status":6,"branch":406,"category":407,"cases":411},47,"2026-08-18 14:49:01","2026-08-20 10:33:11","钟灵柔","骨干律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F768df60c-750a-4fb1-8620-0d5573a3f796.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>个人信息：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">卓安律师事务所 骨干律师（亲办上百件刑案）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">经济犯罪法律业务部 副部长\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">四川师范大学 法律硕士（刑事诉讼法方向）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">四川现代职业学院 兼职教师\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（一）无罪辩护成功：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">Z某涉恶，高利转贷案：上百万的高利，转贷罪，无罪辩护，法院判决无罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L某对非国家工作人员行贿罪：指控行贿530万，无罪辩护，法院未判此罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L某虚开增值税专用发票罪+虚开发票罪：检察院审查起诉阶段，对虚开上千万专票无罪辩护，最终仅诉虚开发票罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">人大代表Y某诈骗案：被控诈骗150万，无罪辩护，最终认定民事经济纠纷…\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）不起诉决定：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">S某开设赌场案：全案违法所得8165万，客服主管身份\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">Z某开设赌场案：获利10万，网络建群组织赌博，管理员\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">C某虚开增值税专用发票+虚开发票案：省级督办案件，虚开金额27亿，组长级别\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">T某串通投标案：招标控制价5807万…\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（三）减轻与降档处罚：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">F某受贿案+洗钱案：涉案1269万，示范庭审，最终判决八年二个月\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">W某贪污案+受贿案：涉案358万，示范庭审，最终判决六年\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">Y某生产、销售伪劣产品案：省级案件，涉案近200万，最终判决低于量刑建议，二年八个月…\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（四）取保候审后缓刑：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">X某诈骗案：贷款公司涉诈8000万，销冠身份\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L某诈骗案：网络主播，演剧本直播，获利60万\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">M某组织、领导传销活动案：上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，获利70万…\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",-283,{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":408,"deleted":31,"code":409,"name":410,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-13 18:20:29","lawyer","律师",[412,419,426,432,439],{"id":413,"createdAt":414,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":415,"caseTypeId":43,"thumbnail":416,"publishTime":417,"content":418,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},597,"2026-10-22 16:07:10","C某、L某涉嫌侵犯著作权罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师、吕灵兮律师为其辩护，获撤诉和轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002F4a613bd1-df4d-4a01-a079-5b11c5fbec75.png","2026-10-22 16:06:30","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、案情简述\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">C某和L某系夫妻。2019年5月，被告人C某在某网站交易平台上向甲（另案处理）购买“XX”网站及该网站上的书籍。购买后被告人C某进运营该网站，销售电子书籍提供下载服务，通过支付宝等向客户收取费用，采取按照不同书籍数量收费5元至8元不等的收费模式。运营期间，被告人C某负责网站日常运营、维护网站及书籍收集工作等工作，被告人L某负责客服工作。2019年6月至2023年3月期间，被告人C某与被告人L某在未取得任何著作权人授权与相关资质的情况下，以营利为目的，开设网站非法发行他人书籍作品2万余本，累计获利10万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">1、本案定性错误，整体看待C某和L某的行为，明显属于“零售”“侵权复制品”，对其适用第218条销售侵权复制品罪更为恰当。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">2、本案证据存在重大问题，具体违法的销售行为、涉案金额并未查清，C某可能达不到追诉标准或依法可不作为犯罪处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">3、本案办案程序明显异常，可能存在选择性司法、量刑严重失衡的情况。刑法具有谦抑性，不同地域之间的司法也应当尽量实现量刑均衡。综合本案的具体情况，C某可能在上海就已被刑事处理过，其行为可能达不到追诉标准或依法可不作为犯罪处理。如果一定要追究C某的刑事责任，则其在上海公安做过笔录、如实供述的行为依法构成自首\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">5、C某的行为可能构成立功。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">6、起诉书对L某的指控并不准确，L某系，且系事中加入，其涉案金额并未查清，机关根本没有完成“事实清楚，证据确实、充分”举证责任。根据存疑有利于行为人的原则，无论定性为何罪，其行为最终都不应当被追究刑事责任办案过程\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">7、L某较之不起诉的同案犯情节更轻，本案量刑明显失衡，即便最终一定要认为L某的行为构成犯罪，也属于“情节显著轻微”的情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">C某和L某在审判阶段找到四川事务所，詹勇、吕灵兮、钟灵柔律师紧急介入，第一时间到法院阅卷，搜集大量不起诉案例，撰写书面法律意见和法官沟通，申请法院调取证明被告人无罪、罪轻的证据，庭上充分发表辩护意见。最终，检察院撤回对L某的起诉，法院对C某判处了更低的刑期，并适用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002F4a613bd1-df4d-4a01-a079-5b11c5fbec75.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002Fa453b09a-12bc-4247-9877-0546a9e4a263.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":420,"createdAt":421,"updatedAt":421,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":422,"caseTypeId":43,"thumbnail":423,"publishTime":424,"content":425,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},588,"2026-10-21 16:40:55","C某、L某涉嫌侵犯著作权罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所吕灵兮律师、钟灵柔律师为其辩护，获撤诉和轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002F3ae651c8-dad2-4440-93c2-2859d17b83c1.png","2026-10-21 16:39:53","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、案情简述\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">C某和L某系夫妻。2019年5月，被告人C某在某网站交易平台上向甲（另案处理）购买“XX”网站及该网站上的书籍。购买后被告人C某进运营该网站，销售电子书籍提供下载服务，通过支付宝等向客户收取费用，采取按照不同书籍数量收费5元至8元不等的收费模式。运营期间，被告人C某负责网站日常运营、维护网站及书籍收集工作等工作，被告人L某负责客服工作。2019年6月至2023年3月期间，被告人C某与被告人L某在未取得任何著作权人授权与相关资质的情况下，以营利为目的，开设网站非法发行他人书籍作品2万余本，累计获利10万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">1、本案定性错误，整体看待C某和L某的行为，明显属于“零售”“侵权复制品”，对其适用\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: 宋体;\">刑法\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">第218条销售侵权复制品罪更为恰当。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">2、本案证据存在重大问题，具体违法的销售行为、涉案金额并未查清，C某可能达不到追诉标准或依法可不作为犯罪处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">3、本案办案程序明显异常，可能存在选择性司法、量刑严重失衡的情况。刑法具有谦抑性，不同地域之间的司法也应当尽量实现量刑均衡。综合本案的具体情况，C某可能在上海就已被刑事处理过，其行为可能达不到追诉标准或依法可不作为犯罪处理。如果一定要追究C某的刑事责任，则其在上海公安做过笔录、如实供述的行为依法构成自首\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">5、C某的行为可能构成立功。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">6、起诉书对L某的指控并不准确，L某系\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: 宋体;\">从犯\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">，且系事中加入，其涉案金额并未查清，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: 宋体;\">公诉\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">机关根本没有完成“事实清楚，证据确实、充分”举证责任。根据存疑有利于行为人的原则，无论定性为何罪，其行为最终都不应当被追究刑事责任办案过程\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">7、L某较之不起诉的同案犯情节更轻，本案量刑明显失衡，即便最终一定要认为L某的行为构成犯罪，也属于“情节显著轻微”的情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">C某和L某在审判阶段找到四川\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: 宋体;\">卓安律师\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">事务所，詹勇、吕灵兮、钟灵柔律师紧急介入，第一时间到法院阅卷，搜集大量不起诉案例，撰写书面法律意见和法官沟通，申请法院调取证明被告人无罪、罪轻的证据，庭上充分发表辩护意见。最终，检察院撤回对L某的起诉，法院对C某判处了更低的刑期，并适用\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: 宋体;\">缓刑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); font-family: Tahoma;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002F3ae651c8-dad2-4440-93c2-2859d17b83c1.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002F85f0b30c-932b-4a6f-8413-1c79ee9a0c5e.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":245,"createdAt":427,"updatedAt":427,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":428,"caseTypeId":38,"thumbnail":429,"publishTime":430,"content":431,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},"2026-08-24 16:01:29","W 某受贿、贪污案认定从犯相较主犯获显著轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F24\u002Ffb1e6372-adfe-4105-a9a2-45984d2cc864.png","2026-08-24 16:00:38","\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>一、当事人面临的困境\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.8pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">当事人 W 某因涉嫌受贿罪、贪污罪被提起公诉,涉案金额巨大,面临数罪并罚的严峻刑罚。作为国有企业相关人员的特定关系人, W 某被指控伙同他人通过多种手段非法牟利,案件性质严重, 证据链条较为完整。若指控全部成立, W 某将可能被判处长期有期徒刑, 个人前途与家庭生活均面临巨大冲击,心理压力沉重。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>二、案件的难点与风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.05pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">本案难点在于: 第一, 共同犯罪中 W 某的作用认定, 其虽非国家工作人员, 但深度参与共谋并具体实施收钱、管账等行为,被认定为主犯风险高;第二,涉案金额认定复杂, 涉及多个工程项目,证据链条长; 第三,虽全额退赃,但如何在量刑上有效体现其悔罪态度及配合调查情节存在挑战。核心风险是数罪并罚可能导致刑期叠加,处罚加重。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>三、律师的制胜之道\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">辩护律师重点围绕 W 某的从犯地位、坦白情节及全额退赃展开辩护。虽法院未采纳从犯意见,但律师着力强调 W 某系受张某某指使参与, 作用相对较小;同时强化其到案后如实供述、认罪认罚、主动退缴全部违法所得等法定从宽情节, 有效降低了其主观恶性和社会危害性的评价,为争取较轻刑罚奠定了基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>四、最终成果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">法院采纳了辩护人关于 W 某具有坦白、认罪认罚、全额退赃等从轻处罚情节的意见。最终判决 W 某犯受贿罪,判处有期徒刑五年, 并处罚金二十万元;犯贪污罪, 判处有期徒刑三年,并处罚金二十万元;数罪并罚,决定执行有期徒刑六年,并处罚金四十万元。相较于同案主犯 Z 某, W 某获得了相对较轻的刑罚,辩护取得了实质性效果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>附件: 本案判决书 (部分展示)\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F24\u002Ffb1e6372-adfe-4105-a9a2-45984d2cc864.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":433,"createdAt":434,"updatedAt":434,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":435,"caseTypeId":38,"thumbnail":436,"publishTime":437,"content":438,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},39,"2026-08-24 15:32:32","F 某受贿、洗钱案突破法定刑下限获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F24\u002Fbeba42de-597d-4ead-8b22-9ae79f57ee12.png","2026-08-24 15:24:54","\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>一、当事人面临的困境\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 23.85pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">F 某因涉嫌受贿罪、洗钱罪被指控,涉案金额高达 1269 万余元,面临十年以上有期徒刑或无期徒刑的重刑风险。其职务行为被认定为权钱交易, 且通过购买房产、金融产品等方怯掩饰赃款来源,案情复杂。当事人被长期羁押,家庭与事业均受重创,亟需专业法律介入以争取从宽处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>二、案件的难点与风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">本案核心难点在于:第一,受贿事实链条完整,多项证据直接指向 F 某利用职务便利为他人谋利并收受财物; 第二, 洗钱行为通过多重转账、购置资产等方怯层层掩盖,资金流向复杂;第三,尽管 F 某有自首、退赃等情节,但涉案金额特别巨大,法定刑期下限高,减轻处罚空间有限。若量刑情节未被充分采纳,可能面临十年以上刑期。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>三、律师的制胜之道\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.2pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">辩护律师紧扣 F 某的自首、认罪认罚、全额退赃等法定从轻情节, 强调其主动交代监察机关未掌握的 1191 万余元犯罪事实,构成重大立功。同时,通过梳理同案犯退赃情况,论证F 某实际退赃金额己覆盖违法所得, 减轻社会危害性。律师积极与办案机关沟通, 将辩护重点置于量刑协商,最终推动法院采纳从宽建议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>四、最终成果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">法院认定 F 某构成受贿罪、洗钱罪, 但全面采纳其自首、认罪认罚、退赃等从轻情节。判决 F 某犯受贿罪,判处有期徒刑八年,罚金 120 万元;犯洗钱罪,判处有期徒刑六个月,罚金 1 万元;数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑八年二个月,罚金 121 万元。相较于法定最低十年刑期,辩护成功为当事人争取到实质性减轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(74, 59, 50); font-family: 宋体;\">\u003Cstrong>附件: 本案判决书 (部分展示)\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F24\u002Fbeba42de-597d-4ead-8b22-9ae79f57ee12.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":212,"createdAt":440,"updatedAt":440,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":441,"caseTypeId":185,"thumbnail":442,"publishTime":443,"content":444,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},"2026-08-17 14:14:42","侵犯公民个人信息罪二审如何争取发回重审？ 钟灵柔律师从金额认定、鉴定程序与主从犯划分找到突破口","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml2856\\wps3.png","2026-08-17 14:13:10","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"261\">承办律师：钟灵柔\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"261\">案由：侵犯公民个人信息罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"261\">案件结果：撤销原判，发回重审\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">侵犯公民个人信息案件中，违法所得金额往往直接影响定罪量刑。但公司业务涉及多人参与时，员工私下获利能否全部计入股东名下，专项鉴定报告是否真实、合法，主从犯责任是否准确区分，都需要逐项审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师办理的一起侵犯公民个人信息罪二审案件中，C某一审被判实刑。律师介入后，围绕违法所得金额、专项鉴定报告、退赔范围和从犯认定提出辩护意见。二审法院最终撤销原判，裁定发回重审，为案件重新查明事实、准确划分责任争取到重要空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一审被判实刑，二审还有哪些辩护空间？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一审法院认定，C某管理的公司通过推广APP吸引不特定人员注册，并非法出售公民手机号码及短信验证码信息，违法所得超过5万元，属于情节特别严重，依法判处C某实刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">本案同时涉及刑事附带民事公益诉讼，由七人合议庭审理，事实关系、人员分工及金额计算较为复杂。一审作出有罪判决后，C某及家属面临刑罚执行、经济退赔和个人生活等多重压力。二审能否对原判认定的关键事实和证据进行实质审查，成为案件的核心。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>本案为什么不能简单以公司总收入认定个人犯罪金额？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">公司业务由多人参与，部分同案人员还存在私吞业务款的行为。如果不区分公司收入、个人截留款项以及各被告人实际控制和获利的金额，容易将他人的违法所得一并归入C某名下，进而影响情节认定和量刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">此外，一审用于认定获利金额的《专项鉴定报告》存在程序和事实方面的争议。鉴定依据是否完整、计算口径是否准确、相关数据能否与其他证据相互印证，都不能仅凭报告结论直接确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>钟灵柔律师如何寻找二审突破口？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">接受委托后，钟灵柔律师立即前往办案单位递交手续，全面阅卷，并就案件中的事实和程序问题与承办人员深入沟通。结合卷宗材料，律师形成四项核心辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第一，拆分违法所得，避免个人责任被不当扩大。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师提出，同案人员私吞的业务款属于其个人违法所得，不能未经区分便全部计入C某应承担的犯罪金额。对C某违法所得的认定，应以其实际参与、控制和获利情况为基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第二，审查专项鉴定报告。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师对《专项鉴定报告》的程序、数据来源和金额计算提出异议，指出一审认定C某获利金额存在偏差。涉案金额直接关系“情节严重”或者“情节特别严重”的判断，必须以真实、合法且相互印证的证据为依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第三，厘清退赔范围。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">原公司业务员明知涉案业务违法并从中获利，其违法所得也应依法追缴。C某的退赔责任应当结合公司违法收入、个人实际所得和各参与人员责任分别认定，不能由其承担全部金额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第四，依据实际作用争取从犯认定。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">虽然C某具有公司股东身份，但股东身份不等于在共同犯罪中必然起主要作用。律师结合人员分工、业务决策、实际参与程度和获利情况，提出本案应当区分主从犯，依法认定C某为从犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二审撤销原判、发回重审意味着什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">钟灵柔律师请求二审法院依法改判适用缓刑，或者撤销原判、发回重审。二审法院经审理，采纳相关辩护意见，最终作出撤销原判、发回原审法院重新审判的裁定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">发回重审并不等于案件已经作出最终无罪或者缓刑结论，但意味着原判不再生效，案件需要重新审理。原审法院应当对违法所得金额、鉴定报告、各参与人员责任及主从犯划分等问题重新审查，这为C某争取更准确的责任认定和更有利的处理结果创造了条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>侵犯公民个人信息罪二审应重点审查什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">此类案件进入二审后，应重点核查个人信息的来源和用途、信息数量及类型、违法所得计算依据、鉴定程序、公司与个人获利的区分、各参与人员的分工及主观明知程度。对公司化运营案件，不能仅以职务或股东身份替代对实际行为和作用的判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">侵犯公民个人信息罪中，公司违法所得是否都由股东承担？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">不能一概而论。犯罪金额和退赔责任应结合个人实际参与、控制、获利以及共同犯罪中的地位作用认定，同案人员私自截留的款项也应单独审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">二审发回重审是否意味着当事人已经改判？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">不是。发回重审意味着原判被撤销，案件由原审法院重新审理。最终结果仍需根据重审查明的事实、证据和法律适用依法作出。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安始终坚持把涉案金额逐项核清、把证据程序逐一审实、把每名参与者的实际责任准确区分，用专业守住刑事二审中每一个可能改变案件走向的关键环节。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml2856\\wps3.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F17\u002Fba85ea9a-7bc7-4686-8493-8fdeaa8e8597.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt; text-align: center;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"title":446,"description":447,"keywords":32,"canonical":448,"image":403,"jsonLd":449},"钟灵柔 - 骨干律师 | 四川卓安律师事务所","个人信息： 卓安律师事务所 骨干律师（亲办上百件刑案） 经济犯罪法律业务部 副部长 四川师范大学 法律硕士（刑事诉讼法方向） 四川现代职业学院 兼职教师 （一）无罪辩护成功： l Z某涉恶，高利转贷案：上百万的高利，转贷罪，无罪辩护，法院判决无罪 l L某对非国家工作人员行贿罪：指控行贿530万，无罪辩护，法院未判此罪","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Flawyer\u002F47",[450],{"@context":354,"@graph":451},[452,461],{"@type":453,"@id":448,"url":448,"name":401,"jobTitle":402,"image":456,"description":447,"worksFor":457},[454,455],"Person","Attorney","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F768df60c-750a-4fb1-8620-0d5573a3f796.jpg",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"department":458},{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":459,"parentOrganization":460},{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":462,"itemListElement":463},"BreadcrumbList",[464,467,470],{"@type":465,"position":6,"name":466,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":465,"position":38,"name":468,"item":469},"律师团队","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Flawyer",{"@type":465,"position":35,"name":401,"item":448},{"records":472,"total":6,"size":212,"current":6,"pages":6},[473],{"id":474,"createdAt":475,"updatedAt":475,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":10,"caseType":10,"title":476,"thumbnail":477,"content":10,"publishTime":478,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":479},317,"2026-08-25 20:01:06","2026 年 8 月 10 日 钟灵柔 非法经营罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F25\u002F6f4569e4-b013-4280-8f66-bb9f0190a188.png","2026-08-25 20:04:02",[480],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":402,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":403,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10}]