[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"lawyer-49":396,"lawyer-news-by-49":479},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":453},{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":35,"categoryId":35,"avatar":402,"content":403,"sort":404,"status":6,"branch":405,"category":406,"cases":410},49,"2026-08-18 14:52:19","2026-08-20 10:33:36","汪余财","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>个人信息：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">卓安律师事务所 专职律师\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">前法官  执业11年  从业19年\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">擅长暴力犯罪辩护、经济犯罪辩护、毒品犯罪辩护、刑事合规\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉成果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">办理近千件刑事案件，3件二审成功保命，30余件二审改判，6件逮捕后不起诉案件，多件案子获得减轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>部分亲办案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L某故意杀人一案，汪余财律师为其提供二审辩护成功为其保命；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">S某故意杀人一案，汪余财律师为其提供二审辩护成功为其保命；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">W某贩卖毒品案，汪余财律师为其提供二审辩护成功为其保命；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">S某某故意伤害至一人死亡一人重伤，汪余财律师为其提供二审辩护减轻处罚；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">T某某非法捕捞水产品罪、危害濒危野生动物案，汪余财律师为其辩护获得缓刑；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">W某某故意伤害至人死亡，汪余财律师为其辩护争取到轻判；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">Z某某诈骗数额巨大，汪余财律师为其提供辩护获得减轻处罚；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">W某诈骗数额巨大，汪余财律师为其辩护获得不起诉\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L 某某涉受贿、贪污，量刑建议 7-10 年，认定自首，判 4 年 6 个月\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">Z 某某受贿 1760 余万，采纳辩护意见，获刑 11 年、罚金 60 万\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">H 某非法经营案，律师介入后撤案，无案底\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L 某某集资诈骗一审 4 年 10 个月，上诉后二审改非法吸存，刑期、罚金均大幅下调\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">F 某某售假金额 30 余万，采纳辩护意见，适用缓刑且罚金锐减\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">L 某某制毒罪量刑建议 15 年，认定犯罪未遂，轻判 2 年 10 个月\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>l \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">H 某某涉转售管制药品，辩护证实主观不明知不构成贩毒，检察院不予批捕\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",-281,{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"code":408,"name":409,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-13 18:20:29","lawyer","律师",[411,417,423,429,435,441,447],{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":413,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":414,"caseTypeId":38,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":415,"content":416,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},570,"2026-10-21 15:57:41","X 某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所何冰冰律师、汪余财律师为其辩护，获得良好效果","2026-10-21 15:57:18","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">结果：法院采纳部分辩护意见，认定自首情节，贪污罪减轻处罚，受贿罪从轻处罚，数罪并罚判处四年六个月，并处30万\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">亮点：复杂职务犯罪案件中精准辩护，自首情节成功认定，退缴违法所得，获减轻处罚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">焦点：贪污罪事实证据链完整性争议；受贿罪部分金额扣减争议；自动投案后如实供述是否构成自首\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">封面语：某区原多部门负责人 X 某涉嫌贪污、受贿百万余元，四川卓安律师事务所何冰冰律师、汪余财律师介入后，紧扣证据细节梳理争议焦点，成功论证自首情节成立，推动退缴全部违法所得，最终获法院减轻处罚，实现法律效果与社会效果平衡。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、案情简介\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">2024 年 5 月，某市某区监察委员会对 X 某涉嫌严重违纪违法问题立案调查，后以 X 某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪移送审查起诉。检察机关指控：2013 年至 2017 年，X 某利用担任某区统计局局长、民政局局长等职务便利，通过虚开发票、虚增开支等方式非法占有公共财物共计 22.9 万余元；2010 年至 2020 年，X 某利用担任某区经济和商务局副局长、统计局局长、民政局局长、教育局局长等职务便利，为他人在项目审批、业务承揽、工作调动等方面谋取利益，非法收受他人财物共计 72.5 万余元。2024 年 5 月，X 某经电话通知到案，后被采取留置措施。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">案发后，X 某家属委托四川卓安律师事务所何冰冰律师、汪余财律师为其辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、办案过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">何冰冰律师、汪余财律师接受委托后，迅速展开全面辩护工作：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">深入沟通与证据梳理\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">团队第一时间会见 X 某，详细了解案件细节，告知其诉讼权利及法律后果，疏导其心理压力。通过反复阅卷，对涉案 100 余册证据材料逐项核查，重点梳理贪污罪中资金流向凭证、受贿罪中财物交付记录及 X 某供述的稳定性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">团队研讨与辩护策略制定\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">组织职务犯罪辩护专项团队召开案件研讨会，围绕贪污罪事实认定的证据链完整性、受贿罪中 “及时退还” 款项的性质、自动投案后供述行为的法律评价等核心问题展开论证，最终确定 “事实争议精准抗辩 + 量刑情节强化辩护” 的双轨策略。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">精准沟通与意见表达\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">多次与检察机关、法院就案件争议焦点交换意见，提交书面辩护意见，详细阐述贪污罪部分事实证据不足、受贿罪部分金额应扣减、X 某构成自首等观点；同时积极协调 X 某家属退缴全部违法所得并预缴罚金，争取从宽处理情节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、办案思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">辩护人的核心辩护意见围绕事实认定、情节认定两大维度展开：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（一）贪污罪部分事实证据不足，应严格审查证据链完整性\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">关于贪污 8.01 万元中 4 万元用途的争议\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">X 某供述其中 4 万元用于单位工作对接及业务接待，虽无直接凭证，但在案证言仅为主观推测，无相反证据否定该可能性。根据 “存疑有利于被告人” 原则，该 4 万元不应直接认定为非法占有。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">关于苹果笔记本电脑资金来源的争议\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">指控 X 某通过虚增殡仪馆开支套取 1.26 万元购买电脑，但仅有证人单方陈述，无财务记账、发票冲抵等客观证据印证资金流向，属孤证，不应认定为贪污款。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">关于 12.66 万元套取资金的争议\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">证人关于资金来源、交付次数及金额的供述与 X 某陈述存在矛盾，且部分虚开发票事实无第三方证据佐证，证据链未形成闭环，应审慎认定金额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（二）受贿罪部分金额应扣减，部分情节不构成犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">3 万元及时退还不应认定为受贿\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">X 某收受某业务承揽人 11.6 万元后，于 2019 年初将其中 3 万元退还，该行为符合 “及时退还” 特征，根据相关司法解释，不应计入受贿金额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">部分受贿事实证据不一致，应从有利于被告人角度认定\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">关于收受下属单位负责人 7.2 万元的指控，X 某与证人在时间、金额、交付次数上供述不一，无客观证据补强，应按 X 某供述的较低金额认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（三）X 某构成自首，应依法从轻或减轻处罚\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">X 某经监察机关电话通知后自动到案，到案后如实供述了监察机关尚未掌握的贪污、受贿事实，虽中途翻供，但在一审庭审中恢复如实供述，符合 “自动投案 + 如实供述” 的自首构成要件，依法应认定为自首。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">某市某区人民法院经审理认为，检察机关指控的贪污罪、受贿罪罪名成立，但采纳了辩护人关于自首情节、退缴违法所得等辩护意见：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">认定 X 某经电话通知到案后如实供述未掌握的犯罪事实，庭审中自愿认罪认罚，构成自首；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">鉴于 X 某家属已代其退缴全部违法所得并预缴罚金 30 万元，具有悔罪表现；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">最终以贪污罪判处有期徒刑二年，并处罚金 10 万元；以受贿罪判处有期徒刑三年六个月，并处罚金 20 万元，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑四年六个月，并处罚金 30 万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、办案心得\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">职务犯罪案件往往涉及复杂的资金流向、多重职务便利及海量证据，辩护工作需紧扣 “证据链审查” 与 “情节挖掘” 两大核心。本案中，何冰冰律师、汪余财律师通过对每一笔涉案资金的来源、去向、凭证进行精细化核查，精准指出部分事实的证据瑕疵，为法院准确认定犯罪金额提供了专业参考；同时，围绕 “自动投案后如实供述” 的认定要件，结合在案到案经过、供述记录等证据，成功论证自首情节成立，为减轻处罚奠定基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">此外，职务犯罪案件中 “退缴违法所得”“预缴罚金” 等悔罪表现的推动，既是法律规定的体现，也是司法人道主义的实践。本案中，何冰冰律师、汪余财律师积极协调家属配合退缴与预缴工作，最终与自首情节共同构成从轻处罚的重要依据，实现了 “惩罚犯罪” 与 “宽严相济” 的刑事政策平衡。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(24, 24, 24); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Tahoma;\">作为刑辩律师，办理职务犯罪案件不仅要精准适用法律，更要深入理解案件背后的复杂情节，通过专业辩护促使案件事实更清晰、法律适用更精准，让每一起案件都经得起法律与时间的检验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":418,"createdAt":419,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":420,"caseTypeId":43,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":421,"content":422,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},446,"2026-10-09 14:41:49","G某涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其辩护   ","2026-10-09 14:40:39","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">被告人G某2014年9月28日因涉嫌犯诈骗罪被逮捕，本案犯罪侵害的对象为国家社保局的社保资金，并非是参保人员缴纳的“办理社保费用”，G某经Z某介绍认识H某，其最初目的仅仅是为其丈夫办理社保，G某还专程到H某上班的单位见了H某，确定H某系社保局职工。从其他途径了解到H某曾经帮别人成功办理特殊社保，有能力办理特殊社保后为其丈夫卢友刚交了6.4万元购买社保。G某自己主观判断H某有能力购买社保，才为自己老公及老公的妹妹交10.5万元让H某帮忙办理社保。G某仅仅起到介绍人的作用，不属于主犯。一审判决在认定G某涉案金额时，未扣除其为亲属（丈夫卢友刚缴纳6.4万元、丈夫妹妹4.2万元）缴纳的10.5万元，这10.5万元G某也被H某骗；未扣除石xx自行向H某转款20万元，G某只是收取了石xx提交的办理社保人员的资料；G某归案后侦查机关从其银行卡中扣押了20.5万元，该款G某只是暂时保管，H某办理好后按事先约定交与H某，该笔款完全能够退还交款人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">二、办案过程\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">我所汪余财师接受被告人G某亲属委托担任G某辩护人办理本案二审上诉，根据案情复杂程度，着手开展了以下工作：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（一）全面、详细阅卷，形成阅卷笔录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（二）多次前往羁押地会见被告人G某，依法向其了解本案关键要点，并客观公正地分析了案件情况，介绍了今后法律服务的重点工作，转达亲属的关心与嘱托，并且细致的完成了对被告人的庭前辅导。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（三）积极主动的向承办检察官、法官就案件存在的问题进行沟通，提出自己对案件的看法和观点，并提交了相应的辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">三、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护人总的辩护观点如下：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1、本案犯罪侵害的对象为国家社保局的社保资金，并非是参保人员缴纳的“办理社保费用”，因此一审法院在法律适用上存在错误。本案所有参与人（直接或间接交钱给H某办理社保人员）明知其不符合办理特殊社保条件，其交钱的目的是让H某通过非法手段帮其办理社保，以达到骗取国家社保局社保资金的目的。参保人员办理社保本就是非法目的，其财产权不应予以保护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2、本案犯罪形态属于犯罪未遂。但由于多种原因，H某收钱后未能为其办理到社保，导致参保人员骗取国家社保资金目的未能实现，属于犯罪未遂。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3、一审法院在量刑时违反了适用法律人人平等原则。本案中与G某具有同一性质行为的涉案人员有很多并没有按照犯罪处理，而对G某却判处十三年六个月有期徒刑，罚金人民币三十万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">4、即使贵院认为本案中参保人员交钱给H某让其违法办理社保行为合法，请考虑G某在案发前并不明知H某不能办理社保、G某主观恶意较小、G某作用明显小于石xx、G某并未实际获利、G某有自首情节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">四、办案结果\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">判处G某有期徒刑六年，并处罚金三十万元。（原一审判处G某十三年六个月）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">五、办案心得\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一审法院认定犯罪侵害对象错误，导致事实认定错误，法律适用错误，最终造成对G某量刑畸重、判处罚金过高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">诈骗非在客观方面要求行为人实施了包括虚构事实、隐瞒真相在内的两类欺诈行为，且欺诈行为使对方产生错误认识并在陷入错误认识之后做出财产处分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">本案应当保护的是国家社保资金，而非参保人缴纳的参保资金，各行为人属于犯罪未遂的状态。一审法院适用法律错误，违背适用法律人人平等原则，且在对G某量刑上未考量G某存在诸多法定、酌定从轻、减轻的情节，对G某的量刑畸重、判处罚金过高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":424,"createdAt":425,"updatedAt":425,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":426,"caseTypeId":43,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":427,"content":428,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},437,"2026-10-08 15:08:34","Z某涉嫌违法发放贷款，团队律师为其辩护","2026-10-08 15:08:00","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">当事人Z某违法发放贷款罪一案一审宣判后，Z某认为其系从犯，未与主犯L某拉开刑期委托我们上诉。辩护人对一审认定本案违法发放贷款28笔、金额1.837393亿元的事实及构成违法发放贷款罪的罪名不持异议。但辩护人认为本案系XX信用社的单位犯罪，被告人Z某在涉案的违法发放贷款行为中不是直接负责的主管人员，而是其他直接责任人员，依法应认定为从犯；且在案证据不能确实、充分正实涉案的违法发放贷款行为均由被告人Z某经办。综案事实和法律，恳请人民法院依法、充分、灵活运用宽严相济刑事政策，对Z某减轻处罚，在五年以下判处有期徒刑并对其适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">二、办案过程\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">我所苏镜祥律师、汪余财律师接受被告人Z某亲属委托担任Z某辩护人办理本案二审上诉，根据案情复杂程度，着手开展了以下工作：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（一）全面、详细阅卷，形成了阅卷笔录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（二）多次前往羁押地会见被告人Z某，依法向其了解本案关键要点，并客观公正地分析了案件情况，介绍了今后法律服务的重点工作，转达亲属的关心与嘱托。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（三）积极主动的向承办检察官、法官就案件存在的问题进行沟通，提出自己对案件的看法和观点，并提交了相应的辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">三、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护人总的法律意见是：一审判决存在部分事实认定错误、法律适用错误，对上诉人Z某的量刑畸重，且与被告人L某的量刑严重失衡；恳请二审法院依法按照单位犯罪裁判规则准确区分被告人L某和上诉人Z某在涉案行中的主从犯作用，全面考虑上诉人Z某所具有的从犯、自首等多种量刑情节和本案发生的综合背景，灵活运用宽严相济刑事政策，依法改判，并对上诉人Z某判处三年以下有期徒刑并适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">四、办案结果\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">二审维持原判，Z某儿子不服申诉。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">五、办案心得\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对辩护律师来讲，前期工作尤为重要，前期工作关系着案件的质量高低和诉讼的效果好坏，扎实的前期工作能为代理律师诉讼策略的顺利执行提供可靠保证。详师按受当事人委托后，做的第一件事情就是询问案件事实，确定当事人可能涉嫌罪名，开要求和指导当事人提供证据，为顺进行专项辅导奠定良好基础。同时积极主动的与委托人交流沟通也是十分必要的，这不仅可以减少不必要的工作内容，而更多的是为自己的当事人赢得相对较好的条件，对于案件本身也可以取到很好的效果。本案结果虽然不理想，但被告人及其亲属对辩护人非常认可。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":430,"createdAt":431,"updatedAt":431,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":432,"caseTypeId":43,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":433,"content":434,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},286,"2026-09-20 11:17:12","T某涉嫌持有伪造发票罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","2026-09-20 11:16:05","\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">\u003Cstrong>一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2017年8月19日，唐某电瓶车载一装满某动定额发票50000份，被协警挡获。经中国某动鉴定属于伪造的发票。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>二、办案过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">承办律师汪余财在接受家属委托之后，立即前往羁押地会见唐某，在充分取得唐某信任的基础上，客观公正的分析了案件情况。其后，承办律师多次前往看守所会见了唐某，详细介绍了案件的进展情况，以及今后法律服务的重点工作，并向上诉人唐某转达家人的嘱托。同时承办律师多次与承办检察官法官就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动的向承办检察官提出自己对案件的看法和观点，并向其提交了相应的辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>三、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1、唐某在被身着便装的协警挡获未完全控制之前，明知该便衣协警打电话报警，有能力离开现场而没有离开，能跑而不跑，留在原地，属于自动投案，到案后唐某如实供述了整个案件事实，其行为构成自首。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2、唐某在购买该发票之前并不知晓涉案发票系伪造。本案涉案发票仅仅用于员工向其所在单位报账使用，并不能抵扣税款，其对法益危害性远小于其他发票。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3、关于本案的量刑，被告人无犯罪前科，且家庭有特殊困难，其父亲患贲门癌晚期急需唐某回家护理，请求法庭综合被告人具有的减轻从轻处罚情节对被告人适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>四、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在辩护人充分发表辩护意见后，金牛区人民判处唐某有期徒刑二年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>五、办案心得\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对辩护律师来讲，前期工作尤为重要，前期工作关系着案件的质量高低和诉讼的效果好坏扎实的前期工作能为代理律师诉讼策略的顺利执行提供可靠保证，并对案件在诉讼阶段的胜败助一臂之力。律师接受当事人委托后，做的第一件事情就是询问纠纷来龙去脉，了解案件事实，确定诉讼时效和管辖法院，并要求和指导当事人提供证据，以帮助代理律师还原案件事实，为顺利进行诉讼奠定良好基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(34, 24, 21); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">同时积极主动的与承办检察官、法官交流沟通也是十分必要的，这不仅可以减少不必要的工作内容，而更多的是为自己的当事人赢得相对校好的便利条件，对于案件本身也可以取到很好的辩护效果。始终贯彻本人的将“你的自由，就是我的追求”置入我的骨髓，贯容于整个职业生涯执业理念。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":436,"createdAt":437,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":438,"caseTypeId":40,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":439,"content":440,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},144,"2026-08-27 16:22:04","H某涉嫌运输毒品，团队律师为其辩护","2026-08-27 16:20:34","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">\u003Cstrong>一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2017年2月26日15时许，被告人H某将毒品藏匿于体内，从云南省xx机场乘坐8L9860 航班抵达成都市xx国际机场。后在机场接机口处，H某被民警挡获。2月26日至28日，H某先后9次从体内排出70颗净重为338.64克的黄色塑料袋装固体颗粒。经鉴定，H某所携带的固体颗粒中均检出海洛因成份。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>二、办案过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">我所汪余财律师接受被告人H某亲属委托担任H某辩护人，根据案情复杂程度，着手开展了以下工作：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（一）全面、详细阅卷，形成了阅卷笔录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（二）多次前往羁押地会见被告人H某，依法向其了解本案关键要点，并客观公正地分析了案件情况，介绍了今后法律服务的重点工作，转达亲属的关心与嘱托。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（三）积极主动的向承办检察官、法官就案件存在的问题进行沟通，提出自己对案件的看法和观点，并提交了相应的辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>三、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护人认为：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办案机关办案程序有一定瑕疵，未能查清全部案件事实，不能排除有特情引诱的情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">被告人H某为获取报酬被他人胁迫吞食毒品；在共同犯罪中起次要作用，系从犯，依法应当从轻或者减轻处罚。被告人H某归案后如实供述事实，具有坦白情节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>四、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1、被告人H某犯运输毒品罪，判处有期徒刑十三年，并处罚金人民币50000元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（刑期从判决执行之日起计算。判决执行以前先行羁押的，羁押一日折抵刑期一日。即自2017年2月27日起至2030年2月26日止。罚金限于本判决书生效后十日内缴纳，逾期则强制缴纳）。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2、对扣押在案的固体颗粒（海洛因 335.6克）及依法予以没收，并由公安机关予以销毁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>五、\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>办案心得\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品数量折算问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":444,"caseTypeId":40,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":445,"content":446,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},77,"2026-08-26 13:43:36","J某涉嫌贩卖毒品，团队律师为其做轻罪辩护","2026-08-26 13:40:55","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">\u003Cstrong>一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">当事人J某2018年3月4日被金牛区公安分局以涉嫌贩卖毒品罪刑事拘留，丽某于2018年3月11日委托汪余财律师为J某辩护人。接受委托后即会见J某。其陈述3月3日晚在“xx”聊天软件认识杨某某，其邀约杨某某到家吸毒。杨称想买遇到套路。J某即联系卖给其毒品的L某，L某送毒品给杨某某时被抓获。杨某某微信转账10月给J某，J某随即被挡获。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>二、办案过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">我所汪余财律师接受被告人 J某亲属委托担任 J某辩护，根据案情复杂程度，着手开展了以下工作：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（一）承办律师在接受委托之后，前往看守所会见J某，依法向其了解本案关键要点，并客观公正地分析了案件情况，介绍了今后法律服务的重点工作，转达亲属的关心与嘱托。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（二）全面、详细阅卷，阅卷后征求J某意见做罪轻辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（三）积极主动的向承办检察官、法官就案件存在的问题进行沟通，提出自己对案件的看法和观点，并提交了相应的辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>三、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护人总的辩护观点是：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（一）J某在本案中主观上没有以介绍L某贩卖毒品盈利之目的，仅仅起到居间介绍的作用系从犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1、J某联系L某的目的是为杨某某介绍毒品\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">据J某供述，案发当晚其在xx软件看见网名为杨某某，发xx动态“想耍遇到各种套路”，J某理解为杨某某想购买毒品被骗，于是就在杨某某xx动态留言“还要东西吗？”,杨某某询问J某价格及品质，J某随后联系曾经为其提供毒品的L某，并将杨某某的地址告知了L某。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">J某主观上没有盈利之目的，客观上也不可能有任何收益。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">J某在与杨某某沟通过程中自始至终坚持其不赚钱，仅仅是帮杨某某介绍毒品提供者L某。见证据卷网名为“某某派”（J某）与“与你才XXX！”（杨某某）xx聊天记录，本案毒品所有人L某的供述也证实了J某在本次毒品交易中不会获利的客观事实。由此可见，J某在本次毒品交易中仅仅起居间介绍作用，其没有贩卖毒品的主观目的。其既不是毒品的所有者，也不是毒品交易获利者，应当认定为从犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">不排除本案存在特勤介入可能性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在案证据《受案登记表》证实杨某某2018年3月4日1时许到营门口派出所报案称“某某派”向其兜售毒品。《结案报告》证实当日2时30分许，杨某某配合民警在广元宾馆附近将L某挡获；当日5时许在武侯区将J某挡获。杨某某询问笔录并未记载此人身份信息，不排除此人系办案单位特勤人员，为此次交易提供机会。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">特勤介入的毒品交易案件，全程在侦查机关控制中交易不可能完成，毒品永远不可能流入社会，其社会危害性相对于一般毒品交易案件小。正是杨某某在L某已经归案后，谎称其要到J某处耍，发微信红包10元钱给J某，到J某楼下后又称没有车费要J某代为支付车费。由此可推知，杨某某发微信红包给J某就是为了达到表面看J某在本次毒品交易中获利之目的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">J某没有犯罪前科，归案后如实供述整个案件事实，认罪认罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">J某归案后如实供述整个案件事实，在辩护人会见过程中，J某表示认罪认罚。结合J某孩子刚满周岁，需要J某早日回归社会尽到一个父亲对孩子的抚养义务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>四、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">贩卖毒品罪判处有期徒刑六个月，罚金1000元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>五、办案心得\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对辩护律师来讲，前期工作尤为重要，前期工作关系着案件的质量高低和诉讼的效果好坏，扎实的前期工作能为代理律师诉讼策略的顺利执行提供可靠保证。详师按受当事人委托后，做的第一件事情就是询问案件事实，确定当事人可能涉嫌罪名，开要求和指导当事人提供证据，为顺进行专项辅导奠定良好基础。同时积极主动的与客服交流沟通也是十分必要的，这不仅可以减少不必要的工作内容，而更多的是为自己的当事人赢得相对较好的条件，对于案件本身也可以取到很好的效果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"title":450,"caseTypeId":40,"thumbnail":10,"publishTime":451,"content":452,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":10},74,"2026-08-25 16:09:10","J某涉嫌运输毒品罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","2026-08-25 16:07:42","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">\u003Cstrong>一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">当事人季某2014年12月24日被高新区分局以涉嫌非法持有毒品罪刑事拘留,其亲属委托卓安团队为一审辩护人。公诉机关指控2014年12月24日凌晨,季某驾驶白色宝马汽车从成都往峨眉山,并在后备箱的一件羽绒服中夹带3袋麻古39.54克及一袋冰毒3.54克。3时10分季某在某某高速成都入口被警察查获,经尿检季某为吸毒人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>二、办案过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">承办律师汪余财在接受委托之后,立即根据委托人陈述事实,前往看守所会见季某。季某辩称，其不知道羽绒服内毒品是谁的，自己仅仅吸毒并未运输毒品,是载同车人员去峨眉山玩。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>三、辩护思路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">经过会见及阅卷后,提出案发前季某车辆被多人使用过;涉案羽绒服被另案涉毒人员李某穿过:从DNA鉴定可知后备箱内物品被多人接触过;季某明知自己车牌未上被警察拦下的可能性较高其明知有毒品就不可能上高速,违背常理;季某去峨眉山的目的是送夏某和陈某去峨眉  山,季某当晚还要返回成都参与朋友婚礼;季某有正当职业,有年迈父母需要照顾等无罪辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>四、办案结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一审法院根据武汉纪要规定认为季某构成运输毒品罪判处有期徒刑11年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;\">\u003Cstrong>五、办案心得\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对辩护律师来讲,前期工作尤为重要,前期工作关系着案件的质量高低和诉讼的效果好坏, 扎实的前期工作能为代理律师诉讼策略的顺利执行提供可靠保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师接受当事人委托后,做的第一件事情就是询问案件事实,确定当事人可能涉嫌罪名,并要求和指导当事人提供证据,为顺利进行专项辅导奠定良好基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">同时积极主动的与客服交流沟通也是十分必要的,这不仅可以减少不必要的工作内容,而更多的是为自己的当事人赢得相对较好的便利条件,对于案件本身也可以取到很好的效果。本案案发时根据当时刑法规定季某涉嫌非法持有毒品罪,因前期辩护律师策略不当,导致在羁押期多次退回补充侦查导致武汉纪要出台,对本案罪名发生重大变化。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(35, 31, 32); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">始终贯彻本人的将“你的自由，就是我的追求”置入我的骨髓，贯穿于整个职业生涯职业理念。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>",{"title":454,"description":455,"keywords":32,"canonical":456,"image":402,"jsonLd":457},"汪余财 - 专职律师 | 四川卓安律师事务所","个人信息： 卓安律师事务所 专职律师 前法官 执业11年 从业19年 擅长暴力犯罪辩护、经济犯罪辩护、毒品犯罪辩护、刑事合规 荣誉成果： 办理近千件刑事案件，3件二审成功保命，30余件二审改判，6件逮捕后不起诉案件，多件案子获得减轻处罚。 部分亲办案例： l L某故意杀人一案，汪余财律师为其提供二审辩护成功为其保命； ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Flawyer\u002F49",[458],{"@context":354,"@graph":459},[460,469],{"@type":461,"@id":456,"url":456,"name":401,"jobTitle":236,"image":464,"description":455,"worksFor":465},[462,463],"Person","Attorney","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"department":466},{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":467,"parentOrganization":468},{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":470,"itemListElement":471},"BreadcrumbList",[472,475,478],{"@type":473,"position":6,"name":474,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":473,"position":38,"name":476,"item":477},"律师团队","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Flawyer",{"@type":473,"position":35,"name":401,"item":456},{"records":480,"total":95,"size":212,"current":6,"pages":35},[481,489,498,507,516,526,535,543],{"id":482,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":483,"caseType":229,"title":484,"thumbnail":485,"content":10,"publishTime":486,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":487},784,"贡觉县看守所、贡觉县人民检察院","2026年10月12日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F5d074fe6-4ca9-45eb-8b18-5f5567a57201.png","2026-10-12 13:56:47",[488],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":490,"createdAt":491,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":492,"caseType":229,"title":493,"thumbnail":494,"content":10,"publishTime":495,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":496},749,"2026-09-29 10:26:06","贡觉县看守所会见，检察院阅卷","2026 年 9 月 28 日 汪余财 受贿罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F29\u002F1d637c92-d60a-4fd3-8e00-3b9d53bdee6d.png","2026-09-28 10:25:31",[497],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":499,"createdAt":500,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":501,"caseType":247,"title":502,"thumbnail":503,"content":10,"publishTime":504,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":505},744,"2026-09-29 10:23:17","文成县看守所","2026 年 9 月 24 日 汪余财 诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F29\u002F7e03485b-a2c5-48b9-9309-9f7ac978e01e.png","2026-09-24 10:22:45",[506],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":508,"createdAt":509,"updatedAt":509,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":510,"caseType":247,"title":511,"thumbnail":512,"content":10,"publishTime":513,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":514},736,"2026-09-29 10:18:19","都江堰看守所","2026 年 9 月 21 日 汪余财 诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F29\u002Fdebef8e2-2ae1-4dea-acdf-618961cc825a.png","2026-09-21 10:17:36",[515],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":517,"createdAt":518,"updatedAt":518,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":519,"caseType":520,"title":521,"thumbnail":522,"content":10,"publishTime":523,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":524},735,"2026-09-29 10:17:34","雅安看守所","危害珍贵、稀有野生动物罪","2026 年 9 月 21 日 汪余财 危害珍贵、稀有野生动物罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F29\u002F32bbd871-84c1-48ec-bfa6-57354beefc77.png","2026-09-21 10:16:49",[525],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":527,"createdAt":528,"updatedAt":528,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":529,"caseType":260,"title":530,"thumbnail":531,"content":10,"publishTime":532,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":533},615,"2026-09-16 11:05:32","邳州市看守所，邳州市公安局刑侦大队","2026年9月 4 日 汪余财 寻衅滋事罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fdc45b2da-7199-4111-82c9-7eb70cfcc14a.png","2026-09-04 11:04:38",[534],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":536,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":537,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":10,"caseType":10,"title":538,"thumbnail":539,"content":10,"publishTime":540,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":541},340,"2026-08-26 18:43:44","2026 年 8 月 14 日 汪余财 诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fe6beaf13-c034-43a1-b932-721d7004deed.png","2026-08-26 18:43:22",[542],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":544,"createdAt":545,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":398,"city":10,"caseType":10,"title":546,"thumbnail":547,"content":10,"publishTime":548,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":401,"lawyers":549},316,"2026-08-25 20:01:06","2026 年 8 月 6 日 - 7 日 汪余财 受贿罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F25\u002Fc876b440-6fec-4b15-a151-870b0ffbec5c.png","2026-08-25 20:03:33",[550],{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":401,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":402,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10}]