[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1227":406},{"entity":4,"seo":358},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":201,"caseIntro":233,"latestLawyerNews":234,"lawyerNews":249,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":301,"serviceTags":302,"serviceCategories":303,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":334,"homeStats":335,"serviceProducts":348},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,133,141,148,153,158,163,168,173,178,183,188,196],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},793,"Z某被控犯销售伪劣产品罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑并当庭释放","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F46275dd7-888f-477b-a649-7da7e054aaee.png","一、案情简介 被告人Z某等人违反国家烟草专卖规定，生产、销售伪劣雪茄烟，Z某被指控销售金额80余万元，获利10余万元，其行为构成销售伪劣产品罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师一直坚持罪名变更为 非法经营 以及犯罪金额证据不足，否则按照销售伪劣产品","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},792,"J某涉嫌受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F2509a569-50cd-4b01-9a35-19c389e40dd7.png","一、案情简介 J某利用职务便利收受他人财物50余万元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":131,"summary":132,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},791,"Y某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6848d7d9-51e4-41a2-a21f-b54242fcf9d4.png","一、案情简介 Y某因涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪被指定居所监视居住。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见维权工作，同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},790,"Z某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获拘留30天内变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F91b12c44-1a46-4763-8d84-764e429c7273.png","一、案情简介 Z某因购买新注册的企业及法人信息而涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师在接受委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},789,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F0c1f1623-3457-4f21-a1b9-8d9db8ea8b5f.png","一、案情简介 G某涉嫌 敲诈勒索 ，此前在杨巽律师的辩护下争取到30天内 取保候审 ，在取保一年后成功解除强制措施。 二、办案过程 在取保候审期间，杨巽律师定期和案件承办人沟通了解侦查进展，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件的看法和观点，争取","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":151,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},788,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获公安机关变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F5d95a9bf-f0cd-4786-9c53-944ebd5e5bc6.png","一、案情简介 G某因涉嫌 敲诈勒索罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},787,"H某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6205fc11-aded-4213-a806-a8ae5d7ca31f.png","一、案情简介 H某等人通过在百度搜索上购买点击率的方式开展物流运输的宣传，在接到被害人运输邀约后，与被害人谈好运输价格，将货物拉走后，再寻找有运输条件的公司承运。在此期间以控制货物为要挟，向被害人恶意加价运输费用，以被害人不付运费便不能拿货",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},786,"S某涉嫌破坏计算机信息系统罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd31daa6c-1432-41a6-b018-2b4f3b804521.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":166,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},785,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcf03627d-48a9-4e34-9f52-04003b7dca1f.png","一、案情简介 W某通过他人介绍注册“万合足球”APP，进而利用注册的APP进行足球赌博违法活动。期间，W某为营利，在明知“万合足球”APP为赌博网站的情况下，发展直系下线，除自己参与赌球以外，还同时享有其直系下线赌博收益的一部分作为佣金。 ",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},784,"T某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd05d8a88-e0f6-432f-b99e-d33d5bb322a3.png","一、案情简介 T某在明知BKEX交易所是一家利用虚拟货币进行合约交易的非法平台的情况下，在“BKEX”平台任技术部软件开发程序员、市值组组长等职，负责合约交易做市程序的优化与维护，共计获利折合人民币91万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},783,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F76708c65-d57a-4b47-884b-ce34ceadca3a.png","一、案情简介 Z某因涉嫌 开设赌场罪 罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},782,"S某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护成功获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F4d5c9a3b-e03d-477b-b12c-7627a9a7d0ee.png","一、案情简介 S某进入某公司兼职参与赌博群的管理，在明知公司开发的聊天结算平台主要服务对象为赌客的情况下，仍参与聊天结算平台的运营以及公司的日常事务。 二、办案过程 辩护人接受委托后，立刻前往看守所会见S某，之后与承办人积极沟通，向承办人提",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},781,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院审查起诉阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F78134179-fb68-4594-aa5f-b108499f461c.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌 开设赌场 罪被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},780,"Z某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcffd8721-7adc-4a2a-862d-a102bfc97fe4.png","一、案情简介 Z某因参与介绍未成年卖淫而涉嫌介绍卖淫罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师接受委托后，第一时间和办案单位沟通交流对案件的看法和观点，检察院采纳律师意见对Z某不予批准逮捕，Z某变更强制措施为。之后，杨巽律师继续跟进案件进展，在Z某取保候",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":197,"title":198,"thumbnail":199,"summary":200,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},779,"W某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F074cf8a5-1ce9-48ba-b196-28c4b7516228.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌介绍卖淫罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件",[202,205,210,213,218,221,224,227],{"id":38,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":147,"name":146,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":222,"keywords":223},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":193,"code":195,"name":194,"summary":225,"keywords":226},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":228,"code":229,"name":230,"summary":231,"keywords":232},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":244,"lawyer":248},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[245],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[250,253,266,278,289],{"id":235,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":251},[252],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":254,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":255,"city":256,"caseType":257,"title":258,"thumbnail":259,"content":10,"publishTime":260,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":261,"lawyers":262},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[263],{"id":255,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":267,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":268,"city":269,"caseType":270,"title":271,"thumbnail":272,"content":10,"publishTime":273,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":274,"lawyers":275},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[276],{"id":268,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":274,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":277,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":279,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":280,"city":281,"caseType":239,"title":282,"thumbnail":283,"content":10,"publishTime":284,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":285,"lawyers":286},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[287],{"id":280,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":288,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":290,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":291,"city":292,"caseType":293,"title":294,"thumbnail":295,"content":10,"publishTime":296,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":297,"lawyers":298},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[299],{"id":291,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":297,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":300,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[304,309,314,319,324,329],{"id":40,"createdAt":305,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":310,"deleted":31,"code":311,"name":312,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":313,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":318,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":31,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":325,"updatedAt":326,"deleted":31,"code":327,"name":328,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":193,"createdAt":330,"updatedAt":331,"deleted":31,"code":332,"name":333,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[336,339,342,345],{"value":337,"label":338},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":340,"label":341},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":343,"label":344},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":346,"label":347},"6","全国分所",[349,352,355],{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":356,"desc":357},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":359,"description":13,"keywords":360,"canonical":361,"image":10,"jsonLd":362},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[363],{"@context":364,"@graph":365},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[366,372],{"@type":367,"@id":368,"url":361,"name":7,"inLanguage":369,"publisher":370},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":371},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":373,"@id":371,"name":7,"url":361,"logo":374,"image":374,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":369,"address":375,"geo":378,"department":380},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":377},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":379,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[381,386,390,394,398,402],{"@type":382,"@id":383,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":384,"parentOrganization":385},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":387,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":388,"parentOrganization":389},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":391,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":392,"parentOrganization":393},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":395,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":396,"parentOrganization":397},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":399,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":400,"parentOrganization":401},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":403,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":404,"parentOrganization":405},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":371},{"entity":407,"seo":419},{"id":408,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":409,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":410,"title":411,"thumbnail":412,"content":413,"publishTime":414,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":415},1227,"2026-10-31 16:46:44",11,"公职人员家属被问收款， 只听配偶说的该怎么答？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F31\u002F8683da1c-02c7-48d0-9301-f88cd7c51f1b.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【摘要】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">丈夫在机关任职被查，监委要求妻子说明家里的收款情况，妻子应当如实配合。亲自收过、亲眼见过、只听丈夫说过和自己推测的内容，要分别说明；不能为了帮助家人补出没有经历过的细节，也不能把实际经手的事项统统说成不知情。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">现行监察规则要求证言经过核实，并与资金等材料综合判断。官方公布的夫妻共同受贿案例，以及成安律师团队的家庭财产核查案例，分别提示了知情参与和账目说明的风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">赴谈前，先弄清三件事：自己知道这笔钱的依据是什么；自己实际做过哪些收款、保管或转账动作；哪些事实能够用原始材料核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">家属身份不会自动带来刑事责任，也不排除自身涉案。先整理真实经过、保存原始记录，再评估怎样依法说明，是当前可以着手的应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">一、监委问家里收了什么钱，家属先弄清什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">问到家庭收款，通常是在核对资金从哪里来、谁经手、与公职人员的履职有什么关系。接到询问通知，不能直接推断自己已经涉嫌犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">丈夫在机关任职，家里有些钱进入妻子的银行卡，有些现金由丈夫带回，还有些款项，妻子只听他说过是借款或朋友往来。丈夫被查后，妻子最担心的是：“说多了会不会牵连自己？说不知道，会不会被认为不配合？”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">应对从核实具体事实开始。同样一句“我知道这笔钱”，可能表示自己看到了到账短信，也可能表示听丈夫说过有人送钱。两者能够证明的事情不同。知道账户收钱，不等于知道送钱原因；知道送钱原因，也不等于参与了丈夫为对方办事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第十八条、第二十二条规定了如实提供材料和询问证人等人员的规则。家属接受询问有相应义务，同时应当准确说明自己所知的范围。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">知情来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"211\">应说明的事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">还需核实的内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">亲自收款或转账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"211\">谁交付、自己怎样操作、当时知道什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">指令、用途与款项性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">亲眼看到送钱\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"211\">看到的人员、物品和过程\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">是否清点金额、是否听到原因\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">听配偶说过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"211\">谁在何时说了什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">说法是否有其他材料印证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">自己推测\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"211\">推测依据及不确定之处\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">不能当作已证实事实确认\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">从调查取证逻辑看，家属的陈述需要与流水、聊天、交付经过等材料相互核对。只记结论、不记来源，容易把有限见闻扩大成对整个收款过程的确认。现行《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十七条、第六十八条要求全面取证、查证属实，正是为了避免这种偏差。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">二、家属有没有刑事风险，怎样看知情与参与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">夫妻关系本身不能证明共同受贿。家属明知款项与配偶职务帮助有关，仍共同商议、收取、留存或支配的，需要认真评估共同犯罪风险；没有公职身份也可能涉案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（一）钱进了自己的卡，要把实际经过讲清楚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条第一款规定共同故意犯罪；第三百八十五条第一款规定受贿行为。判断家属是否构成共犯，要看其认识和行为，不能只看户名，也不能只听“我没有去单位上班”这一解释。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">例如，银行卡由谁实际使用、密码由谁掌握，付款人是否向家属说明过送钱原因，家属是否转达请托、联系收款、协助支配，都可能影响判断。确实不知情、未参与的，要用真实经过和能够核实的材料说明；本人实际操作过的，也应当如实交代。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">最高人民法院、最高人民检察院2007年《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》第七项，明确了特定关系人与国家工作人员通谋、共同实施受贿行为时的共犯责任。即使不构成共同受贿，家属自行利用配偶职务影响收钱办事的，也可能涉及刑法第三百八十八条之一规定的利用影响力受贿罪，须按本人行为另行判断。[3][4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（二）官方案例中，妻子为何因收下礼盒里的钱获刑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">2026年10月21日，中央纪委国家监委网站刊发关于亲属共同受贿罪责边界的文章，其中披露张某、余某夫妻的案例。张某曾利用职务便利帮助老板赵某承揽工程。赵某到家中拜访时张某不在，将装有20万元现金的礼盒交给其妻余某，并说明是感谢张某此前的关照。[6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">余某收下后告知张某，张某让她把钱留下，余某按其意思留存，后用于夫妻共同生活。公开材料还记载二人存在其他共同受贿行为，最终二人均因受贿罪被判处刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">该文分析的关键，在于余某知道送钱原因、主动收下并告知丈夫，夫妻随后共同留存和使用。对丈夫的“知道后未退还或者上交”，2016年贪污贿赂司法解释第十六条第二款有相应规定；对妻子，仍需判断共同受贿的故意和行为。[5][6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">这一案例提示：没有提前商量、收钱时配偶不在家，均不足以直接排除风险。它也不能被扩大成“配偶受贿，另一方用过家里的钱就一定是共犯”。收钱时知道什么、何时形成共同认识、之后做了什么，都要有证据支持。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（三）被叫去询问，会不会当场被留置\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条要求，留置须具备相应涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实证据、仍有重要问题待查等前提，并存在案情重大复杂、可能逃跑自杀、可能串供毁证或者其他妨碍调查情形之一，履行法定审批程序。涉嫌行贿犯罪或者共同职务犯罪的涉案人员，也可能依法被留置。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">因此，家属仅作为证人说明见闻，不能仅因亲属关系被留置；询问中若发现其本人涉嫌共同职务犯罪等问题，则须重新评估身份与措施。既不应把一次询问理解为必然留置，也不能因没有公职身份就认定绝无风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">三、家庭账目有疑点时，团队怎样核对具体款项\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">说明家庭收款，要让每笔钱与来源、时间、经手人和凭证对应。笼统说“都是家里的合法收入”，不能代替逐项核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">成安律师团队办理的国企食品公司Z女士案，涉及贪污、受贿、巨额财产来源不明三项指控。其中，巨额财产来源不明的指控金额为1394万余元，相关司法会计鉴定意见是审查重点。[8]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">团队针对该项指控逐笔核对卷宗和鉴定意见，提出程序、计算方法以及收入支出认定方面的问题。案件介绍所载处理结果是：巨额财产来源不明的指控金额减少172万余元；三罪数罪并罚，判处有期徒刑十三年，并处罚金六十万元。该项罪名没有被整体排除。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">这个案例与家属赴谈的程序、身份不同，能够借鉴的是账目核对方法：某笔收入是否漏计、某项支出由谁承担、同笔资金是否重复统计，都要落实到具体材料。不能用该案结果推算另一家庭的涉案金额或处理结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">家属现在能做的是整理自己合法持有的流水、工资及经营凭证，说明哪些内容来自亲历、哪些来自配偶告知。进入审查起诉等阶段后，辩护律师再依法将这些线索与案卷中的证言、资金和鉴定材料比对。家属无需也不能自行取得监察内部案卷来完成这项工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">四、赴谈前把四个问题核对清楚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">回答收款问题前，把知情来源、本人动作、资金性质和笔录表述逐项核对，能够减少遗漏和误记，也便于评估自身风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（一）审查要点一 这件事究竟是怎样知道的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">回想第一次得知的时间、地点和具体方式。配偶说过的话、亲眼看到的过程、后来查看流水才知道的情况，应当分别说明。不能把“后来知道”写成“收款前就知道”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">核对当时的完整聊天、账户通知和已有日历记录，有助于确定先后顺序。材料确实缺失或记忆不清的，如实说明不确定范围，不因为夫妻共同生活就推测自己必然知道。听配偶说的内容并非当然没有证据价值，但其来源和真实性需要核查，适用《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十八条。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（二）审查要点二 自己在哪一步实际参与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">把收款、保管、转账、使用分别梳理。替配偶保管过卡，不当然等于知道每一笔交易；本人收到付款人说明、按安排收钱并共同支配的，也不能只用“卡是丈夫让我拿着的”概括。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">可将到账时间、指令时间、第一次得知用途的时间和本人操作时间放在一起核对。若被认为“经手就是明知”，应说明各次操作时的真实认识和可验证线索；若确有共同商议，也应如实说明。刑法第二十五条第一款和2007年受贿意见第七项，是评估共同责任的依据。[3][4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（三）审查要点三 借款或经营收入有什么实际依据\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">配偶把钱叫作借款，并不直接证明真实借贷；账户里有较大收入，也不直接证明全部属于受贿。要核实付款人与家庭的关系、实际交付、借款用途、还款经过，或者经营业务、履行和结算情况。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">当时形成的合同、完整流水、交付记录可以帮助检验说法。没有某一份单据，不等于必然违法；已有书面名目，也不等于性质已经确定。依《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十三条和实施条例第六十七条、第六十八条，相关解释应当放入完整证据中核实，不靠临时补造材料成立。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（四）审查要点四 笔录有没有保留原来的意思\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">“丈夫说这笔钱是借款”记录的是信息来源；“我知道这笔钱是借款”可能被理解为本人确认性质。核对时还要看有没有漏掉“当时没在场”“后来才知道”“未清点金额”等真实限制条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">发现遗漏、差错，应具体指出位置并要求补充、更正。已经签认后发现问题的，也应及时说明原记录哪里不准、真实经过如何、有什么核查线索，不能为维持表面一致而继续说错。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十五条规定笔录核对和更正，第九十八条将相应要求适用于询问。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">五、现在可以做什么，律师怎样提供帮助\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">赴谈前可先获得家属自身风险咨询；赴谈时独立、如实陈述并核对笔录；赴谈后按要求补充真实材料。法律帮助应与当前程序相对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（一）赴谈前整理一页事实清单\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">清单只需列出被问款项、本人实际经手动作、知情来源、对应材料及不确定之处。不必先写一篇替配偶解释全部案情的长文。收到通知后，核实机关、时间、地点、要求携带的材料及自身被告知的身份；对健康、照护等现实困难，通过正式联络渠道如实说明，协商安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">本人合法持有的原始聊天、银行明细应完整保存。提交材料时说明出处和对应事项，能够依法留存的清单、接收记录予以保留。不要删改上下文，也不要联系付款人或其他家属统一说法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（二）赴谈时把事实说具体，把差错当场指出\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">首次询问的身份告知、通知和调查人员人数，依实施条例第九十四条等规定办理。如实回答已知事实，记不清的说明范围；需要查原始凭证的，说明待核事项。对笔录有异议，准确指出内容，不以情绪争执代替更正请求。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">亲属关系不带来普遍拒绝作证权。刑事诉讼法第一百九十三条有关配偶、父母、子女免于强制到庭的规定，针对刑事审判中的强制到庭，不能直接用来拒绝监察询问。[2][7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 楷体;\">（三）把自己的咨询与配偶的辩护区分清楚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">现在可以找律师评估家属自身的收款、保管和知情经过，整理合法材料，核对询问程序及补充说明。若家属与配偶可能各自涉案，应先核实委托主体和利益冲突，评估是否需要独立法律帮助。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">监察调查阶段，不能直接套用普通刑事侦查中的律师会见、阅卷或取保候审制度，也不能把咨询服务理解为律师当然可以进入询问现场陪同作答。案件移送审查起诉后，辩护律师依刑事诉讼法第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条等规定办理委托、会见和阅卷，进一步审查证言与客观材料是否一致。[7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">在成都寻求这类服务，可以向由成安律师领衔的卓安刑事风控委员会咨询。首次咨询重点带好已收到的通知、与被问款项直接相关的原始记录，以及本人经手经过。请律师帮助判断自己面临什么风险、还缺哪些材料、下一步怎样依法说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">附 卓安在本问题上的服务积累与刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">服务积累：卓安长期开展职务犯罪法律服务。前述Z女士案中对家庭收入、支出和鉴定意见的核查，为处理家庭收款说明提供了具体的证据审查参照。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，设有公职人员风控部、专项风控部等业务部门。围绕本题，服务可落在家属自身风险研判、真实材料整理和赴谈前后的程序咨询，具体范围依案件及委托确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">专业协作：团队具备原检察、审判工作背景的专业人员，可从资金与职务事项的联系、证言形成和证据审查等角度协同分析。相关经历用于支持专业判断，不代表对办案机关的影响或处理结果保证。[8]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">规则与案例来源\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">以下规范按2026年10月31日可查公开文本核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[1] 《中华人民共和国监察法》（2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行），第十八条、第二十二条、第二十四条、第四十三条。\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[2] 《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》（2025年修订），第六十七条、第六十八条、第八十五条、第九十四条、第九十六条、第九十八条。\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[3] 《中华人民共和国刑法》，第二十五条第一款、第三百八十五条第一款、第三百八十八条之一。\u003C\u002Fspan>国家税务总局政策法规库\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[4] 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》，法发〔2007〕22号，2007年7月8日，第七项。\u003C\u002Fspan>最高人民检察院发布文本\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[5] 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，法释〔2016〕9号，2016年4月18日起施行，第十六条第二款。\u003C\u002Fspan>最高人民法院发布文本\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[6] 中央纪委国家监委网站2026年10月21日刊发《过好亲情关 算清廉洁账——厘清与亲属共同受贿的罪责边界》，情形②张某、余某案。\u003C\u002Fspan>地方纪委监委转载全文\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。该案为官方文章披露的典型案例，不作为指导性案例引用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[7] 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》（2018年修正），第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条、第一百九十三条。\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">[8] 成安律师团队国企食品公司Z女士案授权脱敏说明及卓安现行服务介绍。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">免责声明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-31 16:54:01",{"id":410,"createdAt":416,"updatedAt":416,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"icon":32,"sort":228,"status":6,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":420,"description":421,"keywords":32,"canonical":422,"image":412,"jsonLd":423},"公职人员家属被问收款， 只听配偶说的该怎么答？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 丈夫在机关任职被查，监委要求妻子说明家里的收款情况，妻子应当如实配合。亲自收过、亲眼见过、只听丈夫说过和自己推测的内容，要分别说明；不能为了帮助家人补出没有经历过的细节，也不能把实际经手的事项统统说成不知情。 现行监察规则要求证言经过核实，并与资金等材料综合判断。官方公布的夫妻共同受贿案例，以及","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1227",[424],{"@context":364,"@graph":425},[426,433],{"@type":427,"@id":422,"url":422,"headline":411,"description":421,"datePublished":428,"dateModified":429,"author":430,"publisher":431,"articleSection":418,"inLanguage":369,"image":432},"Article","2026-10-31T16:54:01+08:00","2026-10-31T16:46:44+08:00",{"@id":371},{"@id":371},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F31\u002F8683da1c-02c7-48d0-9301-f88cd7c51f1b.jpg",{"@type":434,"itemListElement":435},"BreadcrumbList",[436,439,441],{"@type":437,"position":6,"name":438,"item":361},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":437,"position":38,"name":418,"item":440},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":437,"position":35,"name":411,"item":422}]