[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1233":406},{"entity":4,"seo":358},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":201,"caseIntro":233,"latestLawyerNews":234,"lawyerNews":249,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":301,"serviceTags":302,"serviceCategories":303,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":334,"homeStats":335,"serviceProducts":348},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,133,141,148,153,158,163,168,173,178,183,188,196],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},793,"Z某被控犯销售伪劣产品罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑并当庭释放","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F46275dd7-888f-477b-a649-7da7e054aaee.png","一、案情简介 被告人Z某等人违反国家烟草专卖规定，生产、销售伪劣雪茄烟，Z某被指控销售金额80余万元，获利10余万元，其行为构成销售伪劣产品罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师一直坚持罪名变更为 非法经营 以及犯罪金额证据不足，否则按照销售伪劣产品","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},792,"J某涉嫌受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F2509a569-50cd-4b01-9a35-19c389e40dd7.png","一、案情简介 J某利用职务便利收受他人财物50余万元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":131,"summary":132,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},791,"Y某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6848d7d9-51e4-41a2-a21f-b54242fcf9d4.png","一、案情简介 Y某因涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪被指定居所监视居住。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见维权工作，同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},790,"Z某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获拘留30天内变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F91b12c44-1a46-4763-8d84-764e429c7273.png","一、案情简介 Z某因购买新注册的企业及法人信息而涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师在接受委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},789,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F0c1f1623-3457-4f21-a1b9-8d9db8ea8b5f.png","一、案情简介 G某涉嫌 敲诈勒索 ，此前在杨巽律师的辩护下争取到30天内 取保候审 ，在取保一年后成功解除强制措施。 二、办案过程 在取保候审期间，杨巽律师定期和案件承办人沟通了解侦查进展，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件的看法和观点，争取","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":151,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},788,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获公安机关变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F5d95a9bf-f0cd-4786-9c53-944ebd5e5bc6.png","一、案情简介 G某因涉嫌 敲诈勒索罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},787,"H某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6205fc11-aded-4213-a806-a8ae5d7ca31f.png","一、案情简介 H某等人通过在百度搜索上购买点击率的方式开展物流运输的宣传，在接到被害人运输邀约后，与被害人谈好运输价格，将货物拉走后，再寻找有运输条件的公司承运。在此期间以控制货物为要挟，向被害人恶意加价运输费用，以被害人不付运费便不能拿货",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},786,"S某涉嫌破坏计算机信息系统罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd31daa6c-1432-41a6-b018-2b4f3b804521.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":166,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},785,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcf03627d-48a9-4e34-9f52-04003b7dca1f.png","一、案情简介 W某通过他人介绍注册“万合足球”APP，进而利用注册的APP进行足球赌博违法活动。期间，W某为营利，在明知“万合足球”APP为赌博网站的情况下，发展直系下线，除自己参与赌球以外，还同时享有其直系下线赌博收益的一部分作为佣金。 ",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},784,"T某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd05d8a88-e0f6-432f-b99e-d33d5bb322a3.png","一、案情简介 T某在明知BKEX交易所是一家利用虚拟货币进行合约交易的非法平台的情况下，在“BKEX”平台任技术部软件开发程序员、市值组组长等职，负责合约交易做市程序的优化与维护，共计获利折合人民币91万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},783,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F76708c65-d57a-4b47-884b-ce34ceadca3a.png","一、案情简介 Z某因涉嫌 开设赌场罪 罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},782,"S某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护成功获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F4d5c9a3b-e03d-477b-b12c-7627a9a7d0ee.png","一、案情简介 S某进入某公司兼职参与赌博群的管理，在明知公司开发的聊天结算平台主要服务对象为赌客的情况下，仍参与聊天结算平台的运营以及公司的日常事务。 二、办案过程 辩护人接受委托后，立刻前往看守所会见S某，之后与承办人积极沟通，向承办人提",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},781,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院审查起诉阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F78134179-fb68-4594-aa5f-b108499f461c.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌 开设赌场 罪被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},780,"Z某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcffd8721-7adc-4a2a-862d-a102bfc97fe4.png","一、案情简介 Z某因参与介绍未成年卖淫而涉嫌介绍卖淫罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师接受委托后，第一时间和办案单位沟通交流对案件的看法和观点，检察院采纳律师意见对Z某不予批准逮捕，Z某变更强制措施为。之后，杨巽律师继续跟进案件进展，在Z某取保候",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":197,"title":198,"thumbnail":199,"summary":200,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},779,"W某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F074cf8a5-1ce9-48ba-b196-28c4b7516228.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌介绍卖淫罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件",[202,205,210,213,218,221,224,227],{"id":38,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":147,"name":146,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":222,"keywords":223},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":193,"code":195,"name":194,"summary":225,"keywords":226},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":228,"code":229,"name":230,"summary":231,"keywords":232},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":244,"lawyer":248},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[245],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[250,253,266,278,289],{"id":235,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":251},[252],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":254,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":255,"city":256,"caseType":257,"title":258,"thumbnail":259,"content":10,"publishTime":260,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":261,"lawyers":262},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[263],{"id":255,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":267,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":268,"city":269,"caseType":270,"title":271,"thumbnail":272,"content":10,"publishTime":273,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":274,"lawyers":275},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[276],{"id":268,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":274,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":277,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":279,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":280,"city":281,"caseType":239,"title":282,"thumbnail":283,"content":10,"publishTime":284,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":285,"lawyers":286},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[287],{"id":280,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":288,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":290,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":291,"city":292,"caseType":293,"title":294,"thumbnail":295,"content":10,"publishTime":296,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":297,"lawyers":298},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[299],{"id":291,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":297,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":300,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[304,309,314,319,324,329],{"id":40,"createdAt":305,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":310,"deleted":31,"code":311,"name":312,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":313,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":318,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":31,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":325,"updatedAt":326,"deleted":31,"code":327,"name":328,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":193,"createdAt":330,"updatedAt":331,"deleted":31,"code":332,"name":333,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[336,339,342,345],{"value":337,"label":338},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":340,"label":341},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":343,"label":344},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":346,"label":347},"6","全国分所",[349,352,355],{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":356,"desc":357},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":359,"description":13,"keywords":360,"canonical":361,"image":10,"jsonLd":362},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[363],{"@context":364,"@graph":365},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[366,372],{"@type":367,"@id":368,"url":361,"name":7,"inLanguage":369,"publisher":370},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":371},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":373,"@id":371,"name":7,"url":361,"logo":374,"image":374,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":369,"address":375,"geo":378,"department":380},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":377},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":379,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[381,386,390,394,398,402],{"@type":382,"@id":383,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":384,"parentOrganization":385},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":387,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":388,"parentOrganization":389},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":391,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":392,"parentOrganization":393},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":395,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":396,"parentOrganization":397},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":399,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":400,"parentOrganization":401},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":403,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":404,"parentOrganization":405},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":371},{"entity":407,"seo":419},{"id":408,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":409,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":410,"title":411,"thumbnail":412,"content":413,"publishTime":414,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":415},1233,"2026-10-31 16:46:44",11,"国企风控负责人已书面提示风险，项目出事后怎样应对追责？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F31\u002Fae924f4c-4eee-417f-96d7-e7c9ce15c12f.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【摘要】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】国企风控负责人事前提交过风险报告，项目出事后，这份报告可以支持履职说明；是否足以排除责任，还要看报告内容、送达对象、本人权限及后续行为。项目亏损、被要求说明情况，也不能直接等同于犯罪或必然被留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行监察规范要求核查有利与不利证据；官方案例及团队案件则提示，责任应落实到具体岗位和行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">第一，提醒是否针对出事的具体风险，是否在决策、付款前有效送达？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">第二，本人是否还有制止、复核、上报或跟进义务，后来又做了什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">第三，材料在单位手中，怎样依法提出明确的调取和核查请求？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现在可先整理职责文件、报告线索和后续记录，形成逐项核查清单，再按所处阶段提交，避免只反复强调“我早就提醒过”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>一、已经提醒过为什么仍被要求说明情况\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】风险报告是判断责任的重要材料，其证明范围取决于你当时具体负责什么，以及提醒后有没有继续履行相应职责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“我是国企风控负责人，投资前写过报告，明确说过项目有问题。后来领导还是决定做，现在亏了钱，为什么也来找我？”这类处境下，最急的是把自己的履职过程讲清楚，并让关键材料进入核查范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">同样一份风险报告，对不同岗位的意义可能不同：只负责出具专业意见的人，重点说明意见是否及时、准确送达；同时拥有否决、暂停付款或持续监督权限的人，还要说明这些职责怎样履行。岗位名称相同，责任范围也可能因授权和分工不同而改变。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">收到审计询问、单位追责通知或监察谈话通知，应先核对是谁要求说明、涉及哪笔项目、本人以何种身份接受核查。单位内部问责、任免机关处分调查与监察调查，适用程序各有不同。不要仅凭“追责”两个字判断自己已经涉嫌犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">项目亏损是否引出刑事责任，要结合企业性质、人员身份、职责依据、违规行为、损失和因果关系判断。《中华人民共和国刑法》第168条针对的失职、滥用职权行为有具体成立条件；正常经营风险实现，不能单凭结果归罪。没有收钱，也不当然排除失职、滥权类风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>二、有利材料应当核查但一份报告不能代替全部事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】监察机关应全面收集证据。你需要把“对我有利”说成可核实的具体事实，并说明材料能够证明到哪一步。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）核查有利材料有明确的规范依据\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第43条要求调查有无违法犯罪及情节轻重的证据；《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第67条明确全面、客观取证。因此，能够说明已经提示风险、没有相关权限、已履行上报义务的材料，都应当结合案件核查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在讯问中提出的辩解，第90条要求如实记录、认真查核。到涉嫌违法犯罪事实的书面核对环节，第217条要求核实申辩的事实、理由和证据，成立的予以采纳。材料“已经交过”，与其中的关键事实“已经得到核实”，需要分别确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果目前由任免机关、单位依法开展处分调查，《国有企业管理人员处分条例》第27条也要求核查被调查人提出的事实、理由和证据，成立的予以采纳，并禁止因申辩加重处分。应向实际办理事项的机关、部门提出请求。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）官方典型案例中法务的提醒怎样影响判断\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最高人民检察院2023年12月9日发布的粮食购销领域职务犯罪典型案例九，是王某某受贿、国有公司人员失职、国有公司人员滥用职权案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">其中一笔事实是，某粮农集团董事长王某某在公司法务提示基金存在极高风险后，仍违反相关规定，两次决定投资合计6500万元，最终造成国有资产损失6713万余元。检察机关强调，应结合职权、履职过程及损失因果关系，区分失职与滥用职权。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该案2023年1月17日由安康市中级人民法院判决，三罪数罪并罚，决定执行有期徒刑十二年六个月，并处罚金80万元，判决已生效。这是全案合并刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对风控负责人的启示是：真实的风险提示可以帮助还原决策者当时知道什么、各人怎样履职。该案例没有公布法务人员免责的处理结论，不能据此推导“写过报告的人一定不担责”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">报告也可能证明出具者已经发现问题。如果其后仍参与违规放款、变更审核意见或隐瞒风险，就需要继续核查这些行为。专业意见的价值，要结合完整过程判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>三、团队案件中怎样把职务名称落实到具体管理责任\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】应把实际管理职责、具体经手行为和资金用途分别核对，再判断哪些事实能够支持责任减轻或不成立的意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的D某职务犯罪案中，当事人原为某县法院院长，面临挪用公款、玩忽职守、贪污、受贿四项指控。团队介入前，案件经过一审及二审发回重审，两次判决均为有期徒刑六年六个月，并处罚金30万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队围绕职责和款项用途展开审查：针对玩忽职守指控，提出D某并非涉案款项直接管理人的意见；针对贪污、挪用公款指控，逐笔核对部分款项是否实际用于单位公务支出，并就相关从宽情节提出意见。最终法院采纳关键辩护意见，数罪并罚判处有期徒刑六年，并处罚金30万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这一结果不能表述为玩忽职守指控已被排除。该案与国企项目追责的主体、罪名不同，可以借鉴的审查方法是：查清谁直接管理、本人具体负责哪一步、相关材料能证明什么。风控报告也应放回当时的职责分工和业务过程，逐项判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>四、让风险报告发挥作用需要核对四件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】把报告与形成时间、送达记录、职责权限、后续行为对应起来，核查请求才有明确方向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）审查要点一 提醒发生在什么时候\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">决策前提出反对、付款前提出停止建议，与损失发生后补写情况说明，证明作用不同。先把报告起草、报送、项目决策、合同签订和付款日期排列清楚，再核对OA流程、邮件、签收及会议记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果被质疑报告是事后形成的，可提供真实的版本记录、收文记录和保管线索，请求核查原始文件。近期写的回忆说明应注明实际制作时间，不得倒签。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第68条要求结合材料之间的联系审查证据，时间不能只靠一方口述确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）审查要点二 提醒是否具体并有效送达\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">报告具体指出“缺少担保，不应付款”，与笼统写“注意风险”，能够支持的判断不同。还要区分是建议补充条件、暂缓决策，还是明确反对项目；提出了哪些依据，是否遗漏自己已经发现的重要问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">送达对象也需核对。只有个人电脑中的草稿，通常不足以证明已向有权处理的人报告；OA流转、邮件附件、收文登记可以帮助核实送达。没有系统已读记录时，仍可提供收文位置、知情人员等线索，由办理机关综合核查，不能直接断定没有送达。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第67、68条要求全面审查并查证属实。提出异议时，写明哪个版本、何时交给谁、请求到哪里核实，比仅说“领导肯定知道”更具体。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）审查要点三 本人的职责是否已经履行完毕\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把岗位说明、授权文件和当时有效的制度拿出来，分别核对有没有审核、否决、上报、持续跟踪或督促整改职责。没有终局决定权，不等于一定没有其他管理义务；制度写有某项权限，也要核实该事项是否实际属于本人负责范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">再把提醒后的行为逐项比对：有没有被要求复核、有没有更改意见、签字确认了什么、有没有按职责继续报告。若签的是“材料收悉”，不能随意扩大为同意投资；若签的是“审核通过”，就要如实解释与先前意见的关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第168条所涉责任须落实到具体履职行为；《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第47条对集体违法决定追究的是负有责任的人员。既不能把参加会议的人全部等同，也不能仅凭集体决策排除个人责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）审查要点四 被追责的损失与本人行为是什么关系\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把提出提醒时能够掌握的信息，与事后发生的经营变化区分开；把本人经手的项目阶段，与其他人独立实施的事项区分开。需要核对损失对应哪笔款项、怎样计算，以及被指未履行的职责与损失之间有何联系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">报告若提示的是担保缺失，实际损失却涉及后续未经本人审核的追加投资，应请求分别核查。也要如实说明自己是否知道追加投资、是否仍负有跟进义务。审查目的在于还原职责和因果关系，不能把项目总损失自动算作本人造成，也不能仅靠“我反对过”排除全部关联。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>五、现在怎样提交材料并请求核查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】先确定办理阶段，再把材料与待核事实对应提交；无法合法取得的材料，提供明确线索即可。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）本人先整理一份能够核对的履职说明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">说明可按“本人职责、发现的问题、报告内容与送达、后续处置、请求核查事项”顺序写。每项判断后面对应材料名称；记不清的时间写明需要核实，不以推测补足。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">材料或线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">要核实的事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">具体请求\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">风险报告及版本\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">当时提示了什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">核对原件及完整附件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">OA邮件或收文记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">何时送达给谁\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">调取相应流转和接收记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">岗位职责及授权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">本人负责哪些环节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">核对涉案期间有效的分工\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">后续签批及跟进记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">提醒后实际做了什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">与付款和决策时间比对\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">提交时，列明材料名称、页数、来源和证明事项，区分原件、复制件与调取线索。保留依法能够保存的副本、提交清单和接收凭证；接收凭证只能证明提交情况，不能替代对材料内容的核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）材料留在单位时写清保管位置\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">离职、停职或系统权限被关闭后，可写明项目名称、文件标题、约略日期、OA流程号、报送对象及保管部门，申请依法核查。不得借他人账号登录、越权导出档案或将涉密材料发到私人邮箱。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以整理合法持有的文件、设备中的原始记录和已收到的通知，标明来源。涉及单位档案，提供位置线索；涉及同事知情情况，提供姓名及其亲历事项，不组织人员统一写证明、补做会议记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）已经提出而事实材料仍遗漏时继续具体反映\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在监察讯问和事实核对中，准确指出遗漏了哪份报告、哪项履职行为及其影响，请求核实并如实记录。到案件审理环节，可依《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第225条提出向审理人员陈述的请求；相应程序须按规定办理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">进入审查起诉后，辩护律师可以依法阅卷，核对报告是否在卷、相关内容是否完整，必要时依《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第43条申请收集、调取材料，并对职责及责任提出意见。此前的咨询和材料支持，不能理解为当然能够在留置场所会见或查阅监察案卷。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）担心留置时应怎样判断\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">依《中华人民共和国监察法》第24条，留置须具备涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实证据、仍有重要问题需调查，以及法定情形等条件，并依法审批。提交报告可能影响事实判断，但没有“一交有利材料就不留置”的规则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">已经被留置的，本人及近亲属可以依法申请变更措施，由监察机关决定；本法第46条规定收到申请后三日以内作出决定。有利材料如何支持申请，应与现有案情、调查需要一并评估。当前应如实配合、保存原始材料，不因担心报告被误解而删除或修改文件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>咨询与材料准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在成都遇到国企项目追责，可以就履职责任和材料核查寻求法律咨询。卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师领衔，针对本题可协助核对职责与报告、整理时间线及调取线索、评估说明和核查请求；移送后按委托开展刑事辩护。咨询前可先准备现有通知、职责文件及报告线索，不必为凑齐档案而越权取材。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>附 卓安在本问题上的服务积累与刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：团队累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件，相关经验包括具体职责审查、款项用途核对及监察与刑事诉讼程序衔接。D某案展示了将职务名称与实际管理职责分别审查的方法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，设有企事业风控部、公职人员风控部等业务部。围绕本题，重点帮助核对履职范围、整理真实材料并依法应对核查；重大问题结合刑事办案与企业合规经验协同研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>法律与案例来源\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">规范核对至2026年10月31日。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 《中华人民共和国监察法》。2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行；第18、24、43、46条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》。2025年修订；第47、67、68、70、90、217、225条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 《中华人民共和国刑法》。第168条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4. 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》。第34、39、40、43条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5. 《国有企业管理人员处分条例》。国务院令第781号，2024年9月1日起施行；第27条第1款第4项及第2款。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6. 最高人民检察院粮食购销领域职务犯罪典型案例。2023年12月9日发布，案例九：王某某受贿、国有公司人员失职、国有公司人员滥用职权案。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队案例：D某职务犯罪案，按团队授权案例说明摘述；团队信息依据经确认的对外资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-31 16:55:58",{"id":410,"createdAt":416,"updatedAt":416,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"icon":32,"sort":228,"status":6,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":420,"description":421,"keywords":32,"canonical":422,"image":412,"jsonLd":423},"国企风控负责人已书面提示风险，项目出事后怎样应对追责？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】国企风控负责人事前提交过风险报告，项目出事后，这份报告可以支持履职说明；是否足以排除责任，还要看报告内容、送达对象、本人权限及后续行为。项目亏损、被要求说明情况，也不能直接等同于犯罪或必然被留置。 现行监察规范要求核查有利与不利证据；官方案例及团队案件则提示，责任应落实到具体岗位和行为。 第一，提","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1233",[424],{"@context":364,"@graph":425},[426,433],{"@type":427,"@id":422,"url":422,"headline":411,"description":421,"datePublished":428,"dateModified":429,"author":430,"publisher":431,"articleSection":418,"inLanguage":369,"image":432},"Article","2026-10-31T16:55:58+08:00","2026-10-31T16:46:44+08:00",{"@id":371},{"@id":371},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F31\u002Fae924f4c-4eee-417f-96d7-e7c9ce15c12f.jpg",{"@type":434,"itemListElement":435},"BreadcrumbList",[436,439,441],{"@type":437,"position":6,"name":438,"item":361},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":437,"position":38,"name":418,"item":440},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":437,"position":35,"name":411,"item":422}]