[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1412":416},{"entity":4,"seo":368},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":199,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":311,"serviceTags":312,"serviceCategories":313,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":344,"homeStats":345,"serviceProducts":358},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,138,142,147,152,156,161,167,172,177,185,189,195],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},883,"陈某敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师为其辩护，数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fc5d22dff-0601-424e-9410-d6556844ab31.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪 结果：数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元，量刑显著减轻 亮点： 成功争取自首、未遂、初犯等从轻情节认定 精准区分犯罪情节轻微性，避免加重处罚 全面论证适用 缓刑 必要性（法院未",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":129,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},882,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪案,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，检察院做不起诉决定。","案情简介 H公司为被告人Z某的丈夫G某创办，主营服务器出租服务和服务器重启、服务器重装、处理服务器操作系统层面问题等服务。 2021年4月至2022年底，H公司为“天天中彩（手机购彩）”赌博网站提供部分服务器并使用Z某及其母亲Y某的银行卡收",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},881,"Z某涉嫌串通投标罪,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，成功取保候审","【案情简述】 2018年前后，Z某作为某建筑工程有限公司的员工，在涉案业务中负责协助完成招投标中标书的制作、联系其他投标公司等具体工作，通过“打招呼”等方式串通投标。对接业务过程中，在收取业主方费用后再支付给投标公司，赚取两项费用的差价。 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":139,"title":140,"thumbnail":10,"summary":141,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},880,"P某涉嫌销售伪劣产品案，石大海律师为其成功辩护，减少刑期18个月","一、案情简介 2021年3月至2022年6月期间，P某以鸭肉干冒充牛肉干通过淘宝店铺对外销售。P某负责淘宝店铺的仓库租赁、原料采购、经营推广、盈利管理，另请他人帮忙打包发货、负责客服。 2022年7月，公安机关现场查获P某打包假冒牛肉干的窝",{"id":143,"title":144,"thumbnail":145,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},879,"W某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，卓安律师事务所石大海、陈庆山律师为其辩护，由一年实刑变更为不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F9710800f-13b3-433c-96d6-26340bdc3451.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果：不起诉 亮点： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪； 犯罪未遂 与犯罪预备；事实不清；检察院采纳律师意见 封面语： W某进入跑分团伙为上游 电信诈骗 集团进行银行取现，涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},878,"Ｍ某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps497.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：检察院采纳辩护人意见，给出适用缓刑的量刑建议，当事人在被逮捕9７天后顺利取保候审。 亮点 ：从犯认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点： 被告人是否为组织者；犯",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},877,"Z某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师竭尽全力，成功为当事人争取从轻处罚","【案件详情】 2024年1月，被告人Z偶然结识了C和大Z，三人通过“飞机”软件和微信“成都卡牌对接群”与昵称为“桃子”“木森Mr”“财源滚滚”“U商”等人取得联系，在“桃子”联系好提供银行账户的卡农人员后，C带人在现场对接卡农取现，并由C检",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},876,"赵某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获得从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fb5cfbaef-5cf4-43b5-b315-f431a4326635.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：法院采纳部分辩护意见，对被告人从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。 亮点 ： 从犯 认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点 ：被告人是否为组织者；犯罪既遂金额认定",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},875,"Y某某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师经过不懈努力，不予逮捕（取保候审）","一、案情简介 Y 某某因涉嫌寻衅滋事而被依法拘留，彼时公安已将案件报捕，局势紧迫，当务之急乃是全力以赴争取检察院不予批准逮捕，为 Y 某某争取更为有利的法律处境。 二、办案过程 在 2024 年 9 月 18 日，秦敏律师用专业精神与高度责","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},874,"L某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获不予批准逮捕的良好结果。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F4be4d806-fab9-42da-bf7f-b0cfda868642.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 违法发放贷款罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 银行事业部副总经理L某的行为不构成本罪；检察院采纳律师不予批准逮捕的法律意见。 焦点： 投资业务与贷款业务区分；是否符合违法发放贷款罪的构成要件。 封面语",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},873,"L某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获得不起诉结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fe92011b9-64b7-47dd-9efa-0b058d66cb28.png","案例罪名： 合同诈骗罪 案情简介： 2024年，L某因涉嫌合同诈骗罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，L某作为A有限公司法定代表人，在参与XX平台营销服务活动期间，指使公司员工通过控制多个账号进行虚假交易（刷单），骗取平台优惠补贴共计120余万元。",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":180,"summary":181,"caseTypeId":182,"caseTypeName":183,"caseTypeCode":184},872,"H某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，取得公安机关对H某终止侦查，解除取保候审的良好结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F26392a98-fd04-419e-bb1e-846648713b0f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：故意伤害罪 结果：终止侦查、解除取保候审 亮点：伤情成因鉴定、检察院立案监督 焦点：故意伤害致人轻伤、补充鉴定 封面语：H某因故意伤害致Z某轻伤被某区公安分局立案侦查，并采取取保候审的强制措施。四川卓",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":10,"summary":188,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},871,"陈某某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获不起诉结果。","案例罪名： 串通投标罪 案情简介： 2024年，陈某某因涉嫌串通投标罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，陈某某作为w公司法定代表人，在参与“J省某系统”项目期间，存在安排其他公司陪标、事先与招标单位沟通技术参数等行为。陈某某于2024年4月4日被监",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},870,"F某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所母华强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","案情简介 2024年6月4日，F某与通过聊天软件认识的W某开房约会。次日早上，F某将W某放在宾馆电视柜上的黄金手镯拿走，并发送W某的照片进行威胁。6月5日，F某某被刑事拘留。6月16日， 卓安律师 事务所接受F某亲属委托，母华强律师前往看守","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":10,"summary":198,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},869,"Z某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,吕灵兮律师经过不懈努力，减少指控事实。","案情简介 公诉 机关指控Z某： 参加黑社会性质组织罪： 2005年至2011年期间，Z某、T某等人进入Z某1控制下的H建设，部分组织成员为组织利益实施多起违法犯罪。 寻衅滋事罪：2011年12月1日20时许，被告人Z某2得知W某在H建设承建",[200,205,208,211,216,219,222,225],{"id":41,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":166,"name":165,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":137,"name":136,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":217,"keywords":218},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":129,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":220,"keywords":221},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":223,"keywords":224},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":182,"code":184,"name":183,"summary":226,"keywords":227},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,267,280,293],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":237,"updatedAt":237,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[258,261,266],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":268,"createdAt":269,"updatedAt":269,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":282,"updatedAt":282,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":283,"city":284,"caseType":285,"title":286,"thumbnail":287,"content":10,"publishTime":288,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":289,"lawyers":290},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[291],{"id":283,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":292,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":294,"createdAt":295,"updatedAt":295,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":296,"city":297,"caseType":298,"title":299,"thumbnail":300,"content":10,"publishTime":301,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":302,"lawyers":303},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[304,307],{"id":296,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":305,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":308,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[314,319,324,329,334,339],{"id":43,"createdAt":315,"updatedAt":316,"deleted":34,"code":317,"name":318,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":34,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":328,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":34,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":333,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":129,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":34,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":122,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":34,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[346,349,352,355],{"value":347,"label":348},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":350,"label":351},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":353,"label":354},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":356,"label":357},"6","全国分所",[359,362,365],{"title":360,"desc":361},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":363,"desc":364},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":366,"desc":367},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":369,"description":13,"keywords":370,"canonical":371,"image":10,"jsonLd":372},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[373],{"@context":374,"@graph":375},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[376,382],{"@type":377,"@id":378,"url":371,"name":7,"inLanguage":379,"publisher":380},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":383,"@id":381,"name":7,"url":371,"logo":384,"image":384,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":379,"address":385,"geo":388,"department":390},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":387},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":389,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[391,396,400,404,408,412],{"@type":392,"@id":393,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":397,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":401,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":405,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":409,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":413,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":381},{"entity":417,"seo":429},{"id":418,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":420,"title":421,"thumbnail":422,"content":423,"publishTime":424,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":425},1412,"2026-11-09 17:17:04",11,"国企负责人在原领导被查后 被问老板往来怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F09\u002F74784673-3ee9-459a-8cc3-5802be2896d8.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【摘要】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】原领导被查，监委询问你与几位老板的往来，不等于已经认定你参与犯罪，也不能据此判断会被留置。眼前最需要做的，是把自己与每个人、每个项目、每笔财物的关系说清楚，核对其中是否涉及违纪、职务违法或犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文结合现行监察、刑事法律规则，最高人民法院指导案例和团队授权案例，说明怎样把笼统的“关系密切”还原为可以核查的事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一起吃饭、经常联系，哪些情况需要进一步核实？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">按原领导要求协调项目，没分到钱是否仍有风险？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">被问及借款、礼金和家属账户时，谈话前应整理什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先按交往对象整理本人行为、职权、资金和材料来源，再依法咨询；不要找相关人员商量说法，也不要急着补手续或私下退钱求“了结”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一、被问到老板往来 先弄清自己被问的是什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】“认识谁”是核查的起点，个人是否担责，要落实到自己做过什么、知道什么，以及财物和职务行为有何联系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">区属国企负责人可能遇到这样的处境：原领导被查，自己被通知说明与几个老板的关系。有人是领导介绍认识的，有人一起吃过饭，有人请自己协调过工程，还有人曾借钱给自己。此时只回答“都是普通朋友”，往往没有回答具体问题；把所有往来都理解为犯罪，同样失准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">从核查关系、履职和利益联系的需要看，调查人员可能追问相识经过、宴请付款、项目推进以及资金去向。这是根据证据审查需要作出的分析，不能据此推断办案机关已经掌握了哪些证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以先按以下顺序分开核对，避免把对原领导的调查直接套到自己身上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">具体情形\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">重点核对什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">暂时不能直接得出的结论\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">同桌吃饭或经常联系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">谁邀请、谁付款、是否涉及管理服务对象及具体请托\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">不能仅凭交往频繁认定共同犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">参与项目协调或签批\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">当时职责、指令内容、知情范围和实际动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">不能仅凭“领导安排”排除个人责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">存在借款、礼金或代收款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">款项形成经过、真实用途、权属及与履职的联系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">不能仅凭备注或账户名称确定性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">国企负责人还应核对涉案时的任命、职责和授权。《中华人民共和国刑法》第九十三条第二款涉及国有公司、企业中从事公务的人员；是否符合具体罪名的主体条件，应结合实际职务判断。本文集中讨论与原领导、老板往来受到核查时的准备，不替代对具体项目的完整法律评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">二、从交往到受贿 需要哪些事实支持\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】普通交往、违纪和受贿犯罪需要分别判断。款项被称作“借款”“分红”，或者事情没有办成，都不能单独决定结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）吃过饭与收过利益要分别查清\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对党员而言，接受可能影响公正执行公务的宴请，达到相应情节，可能涉及《中国共产党纪律处分条例》第一百零一条。借用管理和服务对象钱款，也可能涉及第九十九条。存在真实借贷，不代表纪律层面必然没有问题；存在违纪问题，也不代表受贿罪已经成立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">就非法收受财物型受贿而言，《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十五条第一款要求结合国家工作人员身份、职务便利、非法收受财物及为他人谋利判断。《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2016〕9号）第十三条还涉及承诺谋利、明知具体请托、事后基于履职收受财物等情形。因此，“项目最终没批下来”不足以排除受贿风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）指导案例3号说明了什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最高人民法院2011年12月20日发布的指导案例3号“潘玉梅、陈宁受贿案”，涉及两名街道负责人为企业获取土地提供帮助，未实际出资、未参与经营，却以公司利润名义各收取480万元。潘玉梅被调查后，陈宁安排退回其中80万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">裁判认定，这类“利润”应结合实际出资、经营及职务帮助判断；因关联人员被查，为掩饰犯罪而退还财物，不影响受贿认定。陈宁全案受贿559万元，一审被判无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产，二审维持原判。该刑罚还包含其他受贿事实，不能据这笔分红单独推算刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这个案例提示的是核查方法：看实际交易、履职和获利经过，不能依赖财物名称或事后退还。它发生于旧法适用时期，刑罚结果不能用于预测今天的案件，更不能类推认为与被查领导共同认识老板就构成受贿。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">三、按原领导安排办事 团队案例怎样区分责任与从宽\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】“领导安排”需要具体还原。它可能影响个人作用、责任或量刑的评价，却不能单独代替对本人行为的审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的F某建筑项目受贿案中，授权案例说明记载：F某在项目投标、分包等事项上为他人提供帮助，收受财物1000多万元。部分行为涉及当时集团董事长的指示、安排。这与读者担心的“我是在原领导要求下协调事情”存在可比较之处。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队提出的意见分为不同层面：就部分行为的领导安排，主张评价个人主观恶性和参与情况；就到案及交代经过，论证自首；同时提出积极退赃等从宽意见。材料明确记载，法院采纳自首、积极退赃等核心意见，最终以受贿罪判处F某有期徒刑九年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">应当分清两点：本案最终仍认定受贿，不能据此认为“听领导安排所以不担责”；案例说明没有逐项披露法院如何评价董事长安排，也不足以得出法院已据此认定从犯或免除责任的结论。其意义在于，对个人实施的事实、领导安排的内容以及法定从宽情节分别审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对尚未被留置、正在准备说明的国企负责人，这种经验可以前移为具体核对：原领导让你做哪件事，当时如何理解，你实际办到哪一步，是否知道其中有利益交换。不能照搬案例中的辩护意见作为自己的回答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">四、谈话前 把四项关键事实逐一核对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】先整理事实，再判断风险。每个交往对象分别列明相识、请托、本人行为和财物经过，避免用一句“关系好”概括全部事项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）审查要点一 饭局中是否夹带具体请托\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对邀请人、参加人、付款人，以及是否谈过招标、分包、付款、融资等事项。原始聊天、日程、报销凭证和会议记录可以相互对照。仅有同桌照片，通常不能完整说明饭局内容；反过来，照片没有拍到谈项目，也不能证明没有请托。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">记得是聚餐，但确实记不清具体日期的，说明可以确认的时间范围和依据，不要猜出一个日期。对纪律责任和刑事责任分别评估，依据包括《纪律处分条例》第一百零一条及刑法第三百八十五条，不能以“不构成受贿”为由略过宴请本身的合规问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）审查要点二 协调项目时知道什么 做了什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将原领导的要求与本人动作分开：是转交一份材料、安排正常对接，还是绕过程序指定供应商、改变评审或催付不应支付的款项；是否知道有人为此送钱，是否参加商议或帮助实现利益交换。把当时审批权限、会议意见、流程日志和完整沟通记录对应起来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“我没分到钱”不能直接排除共同受贿；“我是下属”也不能直接证明有共同故意。依《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条第一款，认定共同犯罪需要共同故意及相应行为支持。本人不知情的事项不能因上下级关系自动计入责任；如果明知并参与，也不能只按个人实际分到的钱判断责任范围。没有收钱时，仍需视行为、损失及主体条件核查其他职务违法犯罪风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）审查要点三 私人钱款能否与真实交易对应\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对每笔借款或礼金，核对形成时间、原因、金额、用途、还款约定和实际履行，再对应当时有无请托。借条、银行流水、原有催还记录及资金用途相互印证，比只有转账备注更能说明经过。借款关系真实与是否违反廉洁纪律，是两个需要分别回答的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">涉及配偶或其他账户，应核对实际收款、控制和使用人，以及本人何时知悉。账户不在本人名下，不能排除本人受益或参与；亲属收款，也不能直接推定本人知情。需要结合刑法第二十五条、第三百八十五条及法释〔2016〕9号第十三条判断，不以临时补写的说明替代既有记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）审查要点四 是否存在采取留置的法定条件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条第一款要求：涉嫌严重职务违法或职务犯罪，已经掌握部分违法犯罪事实及证据，仍有重要问题需要调查，并存在案情重大复杂、可能逃跑或自杀、可能串供或伪造隐匿毁灭证据、其他可能妨碍调查行为等法定情形之一，经依法审批，才可以留置。第二款对涉嫌行贿或共同职务犯罪的涉案人员作了规定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一次谈话通知不足以判断上述条件是否成立。如实说明、依法配合，也不能保证一定不被留置。串通说法、删除记录会增加风险，但不能反推“没有这些行为就不会留置”。应核实通知机关、参与身份及后续文书，不按饭局次数或他人案件结果猜测。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">五、本人和家属现在可以做什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】先形成可核查的事实和材料目录；能自己合法取得的原样保存，单位档案提供保管线索，法律评价交由专业人员结合阶段评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）赴谈前 做一张按人按事的核对表\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">每位交往对象单列：相识原因、接触时间、请托事项、本人职责、实际处理、财物往来及材料位置。亲历、他人告知、材料反映和暂不能确认的内容分别标注。情况说明注明实际整理日期，不能把今天的回忆写成当年的记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">通过可核验的机关、单位渠道确认通知的时间地点、需带材料和健康事项。不得因咨询或材料未齐擅自拖延、失联；确有困难，及时如实联系说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）谈话中 说明事实来源 核对记录\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如实回答自己知道的事实，对不记得的部分说明范围和可核查线索，对先前说错的内容及时提出更正。不要替原领导猜测动机，不把道听途说写成亲眼所见，也不要为了显得态度好而承认没有发生的事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十五条规定了被调查人谈话笔录核对、补充、更正要求，第八十七条涉及初步核实谈话，第九十一、九十八条分别将相关要求适用于讯问和询问。核对时重点看身份、日期、金额、本人行为和知情程度，发现遗漏、差错应具体指出。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）家属整理材料 咨询时确认工作范围\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以保存本人合法持有的往来凭证、收到的通知及必要健康资料，按事件整理原始载体和目录。单位系统中的资料，列明名称、保管部门及形成时间，由有权主体依法调取；不要擅自复制、带走涉密或受限材料。合法咨询、依法提交真实材料和正常生活沟通，不应一概视为对抗调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">尚能正常咨询时，可以请律师分析事实、审阅说明、核对资金和程序。《中华人民共和国律师法》第三十一条第六、七项提供相应业务依据。监察调查中的咨询不当然包含刑事诉讼会见、阅卷或陪同讯问权。案件移送审查起诉后，再依《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十四、三十九、四十条等依法衔接辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成都有提供此类咨询的刑事法律服务团队。卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师领衔，可以围绕本场景评估交往、履职与资金联系。咨询时先提供简明事实表和合法持有的材料目录，核对哪些问题已有依据、哪些还需查证，以及说明审阅等具体服务如何约定；不以找关系、保证不留置作为服务内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">来源索引\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">以下公开规范及案例用于核对本文法律判断，核验截至2026年11月9日。历史行为应结合发生时间另行判断法律适用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1.《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条第一款、第九十三条第二款、第三百八十五条。公开全文：辽宁省审计厅网站。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fsjt.ln.gov.cn\u002Fsjt\u002Fsjzc\u002Fflfg\u002F2026092410072061218\u002Findex.shtml\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2.《中华人民共和国监察法》（2024年修正）第二十四条；相关事实调查及合法取证见第五条、第十八条、第四十三条。公开全文：国家市场监督管理总局网站。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.samr.gov.cn\u002Fzw\u002Fzfxxgk\u002Ffdzdgknr\u002Fbgt\u002Fart\u002F2025\u002Fart_4c0c6c2ef585424ca74f1fed4ed6e4db.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3.《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》（2025年修订，国家监察委员会公告第2号）第八十五、八十七、九十一、九十八条。公开全文：国家市场监督管理总局网站。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.samr.gov.cn\u002Fjjz\u002Fdjfg\u002Fgjflfg\u002Fart\u002F2025\u002Fart_688b276784a844488345dceec0ae5c52.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4.《中国共产党纪律处分条例》（2023年修订）第六十三条、第九十九条、第一百零一条。公开全文：共产党员网。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.12371.cn\u002F2023\u002F12\u002F27\u002FARTI1703689211048182.shtml\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5.最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，法释〔2016〕9号，2016年4月18日起施行，第十三条。公开全文：最高人民法院网站。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.court.gov.cn\u002Fzixun\u002Fxiangqing\u002F19612.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6.最高人民法院指导案例3号“潘玉梅、陈宁受贿案”，2011年12月20日发布。一审（2008）宁刑初字第49号，二审（2009）苏刑二终字第0028号。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.court.gov.cn\u002Fshenpan\u002Fxiangqing\u002F4216.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">7.《中华人民共和国律师法》（2026年修正）第三十一条第六、七项、第四十一条；《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十四、三十九、四十条。公开全文分别见北京市司法局、国家税务总局网站。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fsfj.beijing.gov.cn\u002Fsfj\u002Fzwgk\u002F2024zcwj\u002F744120751\u002Ffl91\u002F744123073\u002Findex.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Ffgk.chinatax.gov.cn\u002Fzcfgk\u002Fc100009\u002Fc5212254\u002Fcontent.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">附 卓安在本问题上的服务积累与刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：据团队提供的业务资料，卓安累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件。本文F某案的价值，在于分别审查本人行为、领导安排和从宽条件。成安律师著有公职人员刑事风险防范相关专著，为将个案审查经验用于前期风险判断提供研究积累。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，设有公职人员风控、企事业风控及专项风控等业务部门。针对原领导被查后的往来核查，可依委托开展风险事实梳理、材料审查及情况说明审阅；由具有检察、审判等工作背景的成员参与协作，具体分工以利益冲突审查和正式委托为准，不承诺案件结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">免责声明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。团队案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实、辩护意见和处理结果以相应完整资料为准；公开指导案例保留公开名称。既往个案不能替代对当前事实、证据和适用法律的独立判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-09 17:16:45",{"id":420,"createdAt":426,"updatedAt":426,"deleted":34,"code":427,"name":428,"icon":35,"sort":182,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":430,"description":431,"keywords":35,"canonical":432,"image":422,"jsonLd":433},"国企负责人在原领导被查后 被问老板往来怎么办？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】原领导被查，监委询问你与几位老板的往来，不等于已经认定你参与犯罪，也不能据此判断会被留置。眼前最需要做的，是把自己与每个人、每个项目、每笔财物的关系说清楚，核对其中是否涉及违纪、职务违法或犯罪。 本文结合现行监察、刑事法律规则，最高人民法院指导案例和团队授权案例，说明怎样把笼统的“关系密切”还原为","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1412",[434],{"@context":374,"@graph":435},[436,443],{"@type":437,"@id":432,"url":432,"headline":421,"description":431,"datePublished":438,"dateModified":439,"author":440,"publisher":441,"articleSection":428,"inLanguage":379,"image":442},"Article","2026-11-09T17:16:45+08:00","2026-11-09T17:17:04+08:00",{"@id":381},{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F09\u002F74784673-3ee9-459a-8cc3-5802be2896d8.png",{"@type":444,"itemListElement":445},"BreadcrumbList",[446,449,451],{"@type":447,"position":6,"name":448,"item":371},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":447,"position":41,"name":428,"item":450},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":447,"position":38,"name":421,"item":432}]