[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1419":416},{"entity":4,"seo":368},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":199,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":311,"serviceTags":312,"serviceCategories":313,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":344,"homeStats":345,"serviceProducts":358},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,138,142,147,152,156,161,167,172,177,185,189,195],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},883,"陈某敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师为其辩护，数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fc5d22dff-0601-424e-9410-d6556844ab31.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪 结果：数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元，量刑显著减轻 亮点： 成功争取自首、未遂、初犯等从轻情节认定 精准区分犯罪情节轻微性，避免加重处罚 全面论证适用 缓刑 必要性（法院未",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":129,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},882,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪案,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，检察院做不起诉决定。","案情简介 H公司为被告人Z某的丈夫G某创办，主营服务器出租服务和服务器重启、服务器重装、处理服务器操作系统层面问题等服务。 2021年4月至2022年底，H公司为“天天中彩（手机购彩）”赌博网站提供部分服务器并使用Z某及其母亲Y某的银行卡收",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},881,"Z某涉嫌串通投标罪,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，成功取保候审","【案情简述】 2018年前后，Z某作为某建筑工程有限公司的员工，在涉案业务中负责协助完成招投标中标书的制作、联系其他投标公司等具体工作，通过“打招呼”等方式串通投标。对接业务过程中，在收取业主方费用后再支付给投标公司，赚取两项费用的差价。 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":139,"title":140,"thumbnail":10,"summary":141,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},880,"P某涉嫌销售伪劣产品案，石大海律师为其成功辩护，减少刑期18个月","一、案情简介 2021年3月至2022年6月期间，P某以鸭肉干冒充牛肉干通过淘宝店铺对外销售。P某负责淘宝店铺的仓库租赁、原料采购、经营推广、盈利管理，另请他人帮忙打包发货、负责客服。 2022年7月，公安机关现场查获P某打包假冒牛肉干的窝",{"id":143,"title":144,"thumbnail":145,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},879,"W某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，卓安律师事务所石大海、陈庆山律师为其辩护，由一年实刑变更为不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F9710800f-13b3-433c-96d6-26340bdc3451.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果：不起诉 亮点： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪； 犯罪未遂 与犯罪预备；事实不清；检察院采纳律师意见 封面语： W某进入跑分团伙为上游 电信诈骗 集团进行银行取现，涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},878,"Ｍ某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps497.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：检察院采纳辩护人意见，给出适用缓刑的量刑建议，当事人在被逮捕9７天后顺利取保候审。 亮点 ：从犯认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点： 被告人是否为组织者；犯",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},877,"Z某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师竭尽全力，成功为当事人争取从轻处罚","【案件详情】 2024年1月，被告人Z偶然结识了C和大Z，三人通过“飞机”软件和微信“成都卡牌对接群”与昵称为“桃子”“木森Mr”“财源滚滚”“U商”等人取得联系，在“桃子”联系好提供银行账户的卡农人员后，C带人在现场对接卡农取现，并由C检",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},876,"赵某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获得从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fb5cfbaef-5cf4-43b5-b315-f431a4326635.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：法院采纳部分辩护意见，对被告人从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。 亮点 ： 从犯 认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点 ：被告人是否为组织者；犯罪既遂金额认定",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},875,"Y某某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师经过不懈努力，不予逮捕（取保候审）","一、案情简介 Y 某某因涉嫌寻衅滋事而被依法拘留，彼时公安已将案件报捕，局势紧迫，当务之急乃是全力以赴争取检察院不予批准逮捕，为 Y 某某争取更为有利的法律处境。 二、办案过程 在 2024 年 9 月 18 日，秦敏律师用专业精神与高度责","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},874,"L某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获不予批准逮捕的良好结果。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F4be4d806-fab9-42da-bf7f-b0cfda868642.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 违法发放贷款罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 银行事业部副总经理L某的行为不构成本罪；检察院采纳律师不予批准逮捕的法律意见。 焦点： 投资业务与贷款业务区分；是否符合违法发放贷款罪的构成要件。 封面语",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},873,"L某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获得不起诉结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fe92011b9-64b7-47dd-9efa-0b058d66cb28.png","案例罪名： 合同诈骗罪 案情简介： 2024年，L某因涉嫌合同诈骗罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，L某作为A有限公司法定代表人，在参与XX平台营销服务活动期间，指使公司员工通过控制多个账号进行虚假交易（刷单），骗取平台优惠补贴共计120余万元。",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":180,"summary":181,"caseTypeId":182,"caseTypeName":183,"caseTypeCode":184},872,"H某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，取得公安机关对H某终止侦查，解除取保候审的良好结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F26392a98-fd04-419e-bb1e-846648713b0f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：故意伤害罪 结果：终止侦查、解除取保候审 亮点：伤情成因鉴定、检察院立案监督 焦点：故意伤害致人轻伤、补充鉴定 封面语：H某因故意伤害致Z某轻伤被某区公安分局立案侦查，并采取取保候审的强制措施。四川卓",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":10,"summary":188,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},871,"陈某某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获不起诉结果。","案例罪名： 串通投标罪 案情简介： 2024年，陈某某因涉嫌串通投标罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，陈某某作为w公司法定代表人，在参与“J省某系统”项目期间，存在安排其他公司陪标、事先与招标单位沟通技术参数等行为。陈某某于2024年4月4日被监",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},870,"F某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所母华强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","案情简介 2024年6月4日，F某与通过聊天软件认识的W某开房约会。次日早上，F某将W某放在宾馆电视柜上的黄金手镯拿走，并发送W某的照片进行威胁。6月5日，F某某被刑事拘留。6月16日， 卓安律师 事务所接受F某亲属委托，母华强律师前往看守","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":10,"summary":198,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},869,"Z某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,吕灵兮律师经过不懈努力，减少指控事实。","案情简介 公诉 机关指控Z某： 参加黑社会性质组织罪： 2005年至2011年期间，Z某、T某等人进入Z某1控制下的H建设，部分组织成员为组织利益实施多起违法犯罪。 寻衅滋事罪：2011年12月1日20时许，被告人Z某2得知W某在H建设承建",[200,205,208,211,216,219,222,225],{"id":41,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":166,"name":165,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":137,"name":136,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":217,"keywords":218},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":129,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":220,"keywords":221},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":223,"keywords":224},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":182,"code":184,"name":183,"summary":226,"keywords":227},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,267,280,293],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":237,"updatedAt":237,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[258,261,266],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":268,"createdAt":269,"updatedAt":269,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":282,"updatedAt":282,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":283,"city":284,"caseType":285,"title":286,"thumbnail":287,"content":10,"publishTime":288,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":289,"lawyers":290},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[291],{"id":283,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":292,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":294,"createdAt":295,"updatedAt":295,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":296,"city":297,"caseType":298,"title":299,"thumbnail":300,"content":10,"publishTime":301,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":302,"lawyers":303},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[304,307],{"id":296,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":305,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":308,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[314,319,324,329,334,339],{"id":43,"createdAt":315,"updatedAt":316,"deleted":34,"code":317,"name":318,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":34,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":328,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":34,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":333,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":129,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":34,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":122,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":34,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[346,349,352,355],{"value":347,"label":348},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":350,"label":351},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":353,"label":354},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":356,"label":357},"6","全国分所",[359,362,365],{"title":360,"desc":361},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":363,"desc":364},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":366,"desc":367},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":369,"description":13,"keywords":370,"canonical":371,"image":10,"jsonLd":372},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[373],{"@context":374,"@graph":375},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[376,382],{"@type":377,"@id":378,"url":371,"name":7,"inLanguage":379,"publisher":380},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":383,"@id":381,"name":7,"url":371,"logo":384,"image":384,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":379,"address":385,"geo":388,"department":390},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":387},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":389,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[391,396,400,404,408,412],{"@type":392,"@id":393,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":397,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":401,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":405,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":409,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":413,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":381},{"entity":417,"seo":429},{"id":418,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":420,"title":421,"thumbnail":422,"content":423,"publishTime":424,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":425},1419,"2026-11-09 17:19:26",11,"退休干部被问旧项目， 记不清怎么办？十问十答","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F09\u002F9e387ebf-a49e-406d-89e7-2764688ceb75.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>核心结论\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">退休公职人员被问到多年前的项目，确实记不清细节，应说明已经记得的事实、尚不能确认的部分及可核实线索。已经记得的不能故意回避，不确定的也不应为显得配合而猜测。是否有刑事风险、会不会被留置，须结合实际行为、证据及法定条件判断，不能由一句“记不清”直接推出。赴谈前可将任职、项目和资金节点列成时间线，区分亲历记忆、他人告知和材料记载。核对笔录时，检查日期、金额、主语和限定是否准确；发现实质错误，依法提出补充、更正。本人和家属可以提前咨询律师，梳理合法持有的材料，核实程序及说明方式。监察调查中的咨询支持，与移送审查起诉后的会见、阅卷、辩护，应按各自条件安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>适用人群\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 已退休，接到通知需说明多年前项目经过，但日期、金额或经手人模糊的人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 已经接受谈话，担心笔录遗漏记忆限定或记错事实，需要依法补核的人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 正帮助家人整理旧项目资料，希望明确可以做什么、哪些事项应交律师评估的家属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、真的记不清，会被认定不配合，甚至被留置吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能仅因确实记不清就直接认定不配合或决定留置。明知事实却故意提供虚假情况，与真实的记忆缺口需要分别判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条规定了留置的事实、证据及法定情形要求；第七十二条涉及提供虚假情况、串供和毁灭证据等处理。风险须结合具体行为判断，不能承诺如实说明一定不会留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">岳某案的报道显示，具体转款经过仍可沿银行凭证、经办人等线索核实。其“记不清”的陈述本身并未代替后续调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保存已收到的通知，列清被问事项、可确认事实及不能确认的内容。下一步先核实对象身份和程序，再整理相关线索，不把所有问题都答成“不记得”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、记得有资金往来，但具体金额不准，该怎样说明？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">收没收到、以什么方式收到、收到多少，应分别回答。不能因为金额不准，就否认确实记得的收款；也不应随意报数。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">项目总价、单位付款、个人经手款与本人收款并非同一概念。每项金额及性质均需结合证据核实。本人应按实际知道的范围陈述，材料无法证明的部分不能自行补齐。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">岳某案对账户使用、转款方式和款项性质作了核查，说明看到转账记录后仍需弄清其对应的真实往来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">围绕具体争议款项整理合法取得的完整流水、用途资料和相关账目，标明哪部分来自记忆、哪部分来自材料。下一步核对每笔钱的主体与用途，避免只交一个笼统总数。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、日期和谁在场都模糊，能按平时的习惯推算吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">习惯可以作为进一步查找材料的线索，不能被表述为确定发生过的事实。通常参加会议，也不能证明某次就在场。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">时间、地点和参与人关系到本人有无职责、有无参与以及知情范围。应分别说明记忆程度；有依据的时间范围可以说明依据，没有依据就不硬选某一天。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《认定案件事实应注意的三个关键》提出，可用出差、住宿等客观材料核对记忆模糊的地点。这一取证思路也提示，应检验印象而非填补故事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先核对任职、立项、验收、付款和交接节点；合法持有的签到、差旅记录可作线索。下一步保留不同记录及其来源，查明日期差异，避免直接改写其中一份。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、别人已经说了，或者给我看了材料，我是不是就该确认？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">应如实回应材料与自己实际知道的情况。看到材料、听到转述，不会自动恢复对全部经过的亲历记忆。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需区分材料记载、经材料提示真实想起的内容，以及仍无法确认的部分。对讯问中的辩解，现行《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第九十条要求如实记录、认真查核。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队国企改制F某案围绕评估等材料提出具体争议。已有一份报告，仍需审查内容与其他证据的关系，不能只凭材料名称下结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核清出示材料指向哪件事、哪些内容与本人有关；不清楚处可请求说明。下一步准确标明信息来源，不为迎合他人说法承认自己并不知道的经过。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、我说了“暂不能确认”，笔录里没写，签字前怎么办？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">应指出具体遗漏，请求将真实限定补充进去，再核对完整意思。重点是准确反映陈述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">实施条例第八十五条规定谈话笔录须交本人核对，遗漏或差错应补充、更正；第九十一条将有关要求适用于讯问。签名前应检查更正是否到位，并按程序确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">上述规则本身就是本问的直接依据。它要求记录真实、具体，不能据此推断每处表述差异都会导致证据无效。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">重点检查金额、次数、主语、先后顺序，以及“听说”“看材料得知”“暂不能确认”等内容是否准确。下一步逐处说明差错，不在尚未核对时机械确认无误；有真实阅读困难，及时提出。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、已经签字，回家对材料才发现说错了，还能补充吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以及时通过合法渠道反映并请求核查。补充说明不会自动覆盖原笔录，真实性和理由仍需检验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">实施条例第八十六条允许被调查人请求自行书写说明材料，第九十一条将其适用于讯问。真实差错应具体说明，不能为了回避已如实承认的行为另造经过。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">国企改制F某案的参考意义，在于把争议落实到材料，而不是仅改换结论。该案不能说明补交一份材料便会改变处理结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">列明原先哪项记载有误、准确情况、发现原因和核实依据。下一步将对应材料与补充说明一并评估、依法提交，并保留合法取得的提交记录；不要假称记得原笔录全部原文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、十年前的合同、账目已经找不到了，要自己补一份吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能制作假原件或倒签材料。可以现在整理查找说明和资料线索，明确真实形成时间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">工作底稿可以帮助寻找证据，不能冒充当时的原始记录。资料缺失是否影响认定，应结合其他证据判断；退休和年代久远都不能单独证明没有责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][3]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">国企改制F某案发生于二十年前，团队仍围绕资产转移性质、评估材料等提出意见。可借鉴的是审查路径，不能推导旧项目当然不再追究。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">记录文件名称、涉及期间、可能保管部门及既往查找情况；对单位档案，先提供目录或线索。下一步由有权主体依法核查，不擅取涉密档案，也不以新写说明冒充旧材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>八、能找当年同事一起回忆，先把说法对齐吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能组织统一说法、编造经过或干扰作证。正常联系与串供并不相同，但围绕正在核查的事实对口径，会带来额外风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察法第七十二条涉及串供、伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据等行为。查资料可先查保管路径；若涉及接触证人、核实证言，宜先由律师评估合法方式及程序要求。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">天津市纪委监委网站刊载的专业文章强调以证据整理案件事实，不能人为拼接。这支持独立核实，不支持共同编排一致叙述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保留现有记录和完整上下文，不删除既有联系痕迹。下一步向律师列清拟找的材料、保管单位及联系目的；避免给同事发答案、转述别人证言或请家属居中传话。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>九、家属不懂当年的事，能帮着做哪些准备？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以帮助整理合法持有的资料和生活、健康事项，不能替本人补出没有亲历的经过。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">应区分家属自己的见闻、听本人讲述的内容和材料记载。涉及保密、单位档案或敏感信息，先核清提供范围；合法咨询、依法提交材料不应一概等同于干扰调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">F某案提示，历史项目需要核对具体资产和程序。家属能帮助的是寻找、分类真实材料，不能根据最终结果倒推自己应怎样补写案情。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">整理已收到的通知、合法持有的相关财务记录；确有影响理解或记忆的疾病，再整理对应诊疗材料。下一步向律师说明材料是谁取得、何时形成、用于核对什么，不无差别外传全部私人和单位资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>十、谈话前可以找律师吗，成都有这类服务吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以依法咨询。成都的四川卓安律师事务所可围绕公职人员旧项目危机应对，评估事实、材料及程序问题；具体承办与范围须另行确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国律师法》第三十一条包含非诉讼服务与法律咨询。监察调查中不能直接承诺陪同讯问、会见留置人员或阅卷；移送审查起诉后，按刑事诉讼规则衔接辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[3][4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队F某案显示历史项目定性和证据可以分别审查；律师主张自首，法院认定坦白，最终以贪污罪判处三年、缓刑四年。工作意见与采纳结果应分清。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先准备通知信息、本人职责及关键材料目录。下一步确认委托目标，是梳理时间线、核查金额，还是审阅补充说明；具体成果和反馈依程序及委托约定，不把内部底稿或案卷当然当作家属应取得的材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>工作对照表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>不同节点可以核对什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">当前节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">需要核实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">律师可依法评估的工作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">本人或家属配合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">赴谈前\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">通知、职责、旧项目节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">咨询、时间线与材料缺口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">提供合法材料及来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">核对笔录时\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">事实及限定有无遗漏\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">事前说明核对重点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">本人逐项阅读、提出差错\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">离场后发现差错\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">原记载、准确情况及依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">评估补充说明与提交方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">提供具体对应材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">移送审查起诉后\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">移送和受理信息、争议事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">依法会见、阅卷、提出意见\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">补充合法材料和线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">表中工作以真实程序、法定条件及委托范围为前提，不能理解为每案均需、均能实施。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>材料清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>只整理与争议直接有关的材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">具体材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">核实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">整理提醒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">通知与程序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">已收到的通知、合法沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">确认对象、时间和事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">不以电话称呼替代程序核实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">职责与节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">任职、交接、项目节点记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">核对职责及参与期间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">单位档案先列目录和线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">资金与业务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">相关流水、合同及用途材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">分辨项目款与个人往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">保留完整上下文及来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">差错与健康\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">补核依据；确有关联的病历\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"185\">说明更正原因或保障需求\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">不冒充旧记录，不虚构病情\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六个容易误判的地方\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 认为退休就不再追究。应核实历史行为及适用规则，不能凭退休日期判断责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 认为记不清就全部否认。将记得的部分与缺口分开，不能以局部模糊否认已知事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 认为材料上的时间就是发生时间。合同、付款、记账可能属于不同节点，应分别比对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4. 认为日期记错就整件事不能认定。要看差异影响哪个关键事实，并结合全案证据判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5. 认为签字后只能照原话继续说。发现真实差错应及时补核，补充说明也须有依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6. 认为律师可以保证“安全过谈话”。应确认具体工作和权限，不能以结果承诺代替评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>与律师沟通时核对三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 当前最需要判断什么：收款、履职行为、参与范围，还是笔录的具体差错。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 还缺哪项材料：列清所缺内容、保管线索和合法取得方式，避免笼统要求“找齐所有证据”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 下一步如何安排：确认是否需要补充说明、提交条件及依约可反馈的内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>需要避免的高风险行为\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不得伪造、变造旧材料，组织串供，隐匿或毁灭证据。不要在未经核实的情况下让家属替本人确认事实，也不要擅自外传受保密要求约束的资料。正常咨询和依法反映意见，应通过适当渠道开展。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专业支撑与相关案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>服务积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安团队累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件。前述国企改制F某案，体现了对历史资产、金额证据和从宽情节分别审查的经验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师发起、领衔，设有公职人员风控、专项风控等业务部门，可依法围绕赴谈前的事实梳理和风险研判提供支持。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>协作与具体争点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队具备法院、检察院、公安机关工作背景的专业人员，可从调查、审查和审判要求核对材料。对本题，服务应落到日期、款项、知情范围及补充说明，不扩展成不必要的全套项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案例能够说明的范围\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">核对重点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">准确结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">引用边界\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">公开报道的岳某受贿案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">银行凭证、经办人与账户使用\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">有期徒刑三年，缓刑五年，罚金20万元\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">说明客观线索核查，不评价其记忆真假\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">团队国企改制F某案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">资产转移性质、评估材料及从宽情节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">贪污罪，有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">该案按贪污罪定罪，法院认定坦白，未认定自首\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>咨询与材料准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">准备一页事实时间线、通知信息和合法材料目录，可与成安律师团队核对当前争点。对不宜直接传输的单位档案、敏感材料，先说明来源和保管线索，再确定处理方式。具体工作、提交安排和反馈范围，应在核实程序后约定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对记忆缺口，先标清楚；对确定事实，再找依据。今天可以完成的一步，就是把旧项目中已经能够确认的节点整理出来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>来源索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国监察法》，2024年修正，重点参见第二十四条、第四十三条、第七十二条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>国家监察委员会举报网站公开全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》，2025年修订，重点参见第六十条、第八十五至八十七条、第九十条、第九十一条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>国家市场监督管理总局转载正式全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》，2018年修正，参见第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条、第五十五条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>国家市场监督管理总局公开全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《中华人民共和国律师法》，2026年修正，参见第三十一条、第四十一条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>北京市司法局公开全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《检察官提前介入锁定关键证据 河南息县一卫生院原院长受贿被判刑》，检察日报，2020年5月19日。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>最高人民检察院网站\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6]曾威斌《认定案件事实应注意的三个关键》，2022年9月16日。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>天津市纪委监委网站转载中国纪检监察报文章\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[7]成安律师团队国企改制F某案，依据授权案例介绍作脱敏转述，未公开案号；引用范围限于该案载明的争点、意见与处理结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行规则核对截至2026年11月9日；历史案件事实与当前规则分别理解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-09 17:19:03",{"id":420,"createdAt":426,"updatedAt":426,"deleted":34,"code":427,"name":428,"icon":35,"sort":182,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":430,"description":431,"keywords":35,"canonical":432,"image":422,"jsonLd":433},"退休干部被问旧项目， 记不清怎么办？十问十答 - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","核心结论 退休公职人员被问到多年前的项目，确实记不清细节，应说明已经记得的事实、尚不能确认的部分及可核实线索。已经记得的不能故意回避，不确定的也不应为显得配合而猜测。是否有刑事风险、会不会被留置，须结合实际行为、证据及法定条件判断，不能由一句“记不清”直接推出。赴谈前可将任职、项目和资金节点列成时间线，区分亲历记忆、他","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1419",[434],{"@context":374,"@graph":435},[436,443],{"@type":437,"@id":432,"url":432,"headline":421,"description":431,"datePublished":438,"dateModified":439,"author":440,"publisher":441,"articleSection":428,"inLanguage":379,"image":442},"Article","2026-11-09T17:19:03+08:00","2026-11-09T17:19:26+08:00",{"@id":381},{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F09\u002F9e387ebf-a49e-406d-89e7-2764688ceb75.jpg",{"@type":444,"itemListElement":445},"BreadcrumbList",[446,449,451],{"@type":447,"position":6,"name":448,"item":371},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":447,"position":41,"name":428,"item":450},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":447,"position":38,"name":421,"item":432}]