[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1569":420},{"entity":4,"seo":372},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":198,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":248,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":315,"serviceTags":316,"serviceCategories":317,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":348,"homeStats":349,"serviceProducts":362},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,136,141,146,153,158,162,167,172,176,181,189,193],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},918,"D某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨清瑶律师为其辩护，判处有期徒刑三年六个月，并处罚金126万元（缓刑未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平）​","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fc40c2125-1df9-4ed8-9d5b-92c48e48aba9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：侵犯公民个人信息罪 结果：判处三年六个月，并处126万元（未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平） 亮点： 精准定性争议：成功驳斥方关于获利金额的指控（从218万元降至125万元），直接影响量刑基准。 ",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":128,"summary":129,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},917,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功争取取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2f3436fc-d30e-4b14-89ad-b7460107338c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名：诈骗罪 （资金盘） 结果： 吸粉引流类诈骗，30天成功争取 取保候审 亮点： 多次诉讼辅导、办案单位有效沟通；公安机关采纳律师意见； 焦点： 主观明知时间、程度；本案中的地位、作用； 案例综述： 先说以下涉案","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},916,"x某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国边境罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队为其辩护，获轻判","一、【案情简述】 2019年4月，当事人持护照由成都飞抵柬埔寨从事“炒群”工作，同年8月回国，在境外诈骗窝点累计三个月，获利23500元，期间被害人被诈骗68万余元。 二、【辩护思路】 晏律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往羁押地会见当事",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":139,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},915,"X 某某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国（边）境罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功打掉诈骗罪，刑期大幅降低","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2e058be9-53ca-4220-9651-8ac5cfb55285.png","一、案件核心信息 · 罪名 ： 诈骗罪 、偷越国（边）境罪 · 辩护结果 ：律师成功打掉诈骗罪，仅以偷越国（边）境罪起诉，大幅降低刑期 · 案件亮点 ：精准打掉重罪指控；区分主观明知与被胁迫情形；在校大学生涉案从轻处理 · 封面语 ：X 某",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},914,"X 某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F004d7c52-4b16-4b8a-a67d-5394769a116f.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，X 某某成功 取保候审 案件亮点 ：在前期辩护未达预期后，律师介入实现取保候审突破；检察院认可从宽处理情节 封面语 ：X 某某轻信朋友出借银行卡并协助取现，涉",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},913,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金罪、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队律律师为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F86207993-8a55-4116-b332-acea52d593d4.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任S社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服务的Z综合服务中心和X综合服务中心两家民办非企业单位属于社区的资金19.2888万元占为已有并予以挥霍。2022","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":10,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":179,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ",{"id":182,"title":183,"thumbnail":184,"summary":185,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":194,"title":195,"thumbnail":196,"summary":197,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",[199,202,207,210,215,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":152,"name":151,"summary":200,"keywords":201},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":203,"name":204,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":216,"name":217,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":186,"code":188,"name":187,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":243,"lawyer":247},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[244],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[249,252,271,284,297],{"id":234,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":250},[251],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":253,"createdAt":241,"updatedAt":241,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":254,"city":255,"caseType":256,"title":257,"thumbnail":258,"content":10,"publishTime":259,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":260,"lawyers":261},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[262,265,270],{"id":254,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":264,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":266,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":268,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":269,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":272,"createdAt":273,"updatedAt":273,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":274,"city":275,"caseType":276,"title":277,"thumbnail":278,"content":10,"publishTime":279,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":280,"lawyers":281},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[282],{"id":274,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":280,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":283,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":285,"createdAt":286,"updatedAt":286,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":287,"city":288,"caseType":289,"title":290,"thumbnail":291,"content":10,"publishTime":292,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":293,"lawyers":294},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[295],{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":293,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":296,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":298,"createdAt":299,"updatedAt":299,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":300,"city":301,"caseType":302,"title":303,"thumbnail":304,"content":10,"publishTime":305,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":306,"lawyers":307},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[308,311],{"id":300,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":312,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":313,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":314,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[318,323,328,333,338,343],{"id":43,"createdAt":319,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":34,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":327,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":34,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":332,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":334,"deleted":34,"code":335,"name":336,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":337,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":339,"updatedAt":340,"deleted":34,"code":341,"name":342,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":344,"updatedAt":345,"deleted":34,"code":346,"name":347,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[350,353,356,359],{"value":351,"label":352},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":354,"label":355},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":357,"label":358},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":360,"label":361},"6","全国分所",[363,366,369],{"title":364,"desc":365},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":367,"desc":368},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":370,"desc":371},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":373,"description":13,"keywords":374,"canonical":375,"image":10,"jsonLd":376},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[377],{"@context":378,"@graph":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[380,386],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"url":375,"name":7,"inLanguage":383,"publisher":384},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":387,"@id":385,"name":7,"url":375,"logo":388,"image":388,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":383,"address":389,"geo":392,"department":394},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":391},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":393,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[395,400,404,408,412,416],{"@type":396,"@id":397,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":401,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":405,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":409,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":413,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":417,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":418,"parentOrganization":419},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":385},{"entity":421,"seo":433},{"id":422,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":424,"title":425,"thumbnail":426,"content":427,"publishTime":428,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":429},1569,"2026-11-13 22:43:26",11,"公职人员借了承包商二十万元没借条 被举报受贿怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F1687aabc-640d-470c-8299-0a632dc608e1.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【摘要】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】没有借条，不等于二十万元就是受贿；有转账和买房记录，也不足以单独证明真实借款。应核对当时为何借、怎么约定、钱用到哪里、是否准备归还，以及承包商与本人职权之间的关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行规则和公开案例均要求综合判断。即使不构成受贿，向管理服务对象借款仍可能存在纪律风险。团队案件也提示，资金性质的辩护意见与法院最终处理结果应分别看待。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最先要回答的是：当时有没有真实借款约定？现存哪些原始记录能印证？举报后能否补借条、怎样还款？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">目前可以先列出一页资金时间线，保存完整聊天、银行流水和用途凭据，再由律师评估待说明的问题。不要倒签借条、补造还款记录或联系对方统一说法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>一、被举报后 先分清正在核查什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】当前需要解决的是这笔钱的真实性质，以及本人应当怎样如实说明；“没有借条”只是其中一个事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“承包商是认识多年的朋友，我买房时向他借了二十万元，没打借条。现在有人举报，我该怎么讲？”这种处境下，先核对谁借、谁转、谁用、谁还，以及借款前后是否存在工程请托。以下讨论以具有国家工作人员身份、与承包商存在职务关联的人员为重点；具体身份仍须结合岗位职责判断。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">风险要分开看：款项是否属于受贿；即使是真实借款，是否违反廉洁纪律；当前是否达到采取留置措施的条件。这三个问题不能用同一个“没事”或“有事”回答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">当前困惑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">需要核对的条件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">现在可以做什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">没借条就是受贿吗\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">借款约定、资金用途、归还意思与行为、职权关联\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">找出当时形成的记录，逐项对应\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">是真借款就没问题吗\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">出借人是否为管理服务对象，是否可能影响公正执行公务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">把私人交往与职务关系一并说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">会不会被留置\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">涉嫌严重职务违法或职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实证据、仍需调查，并具法定情形及审批\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">核实通知和程序，不猜测个案概率\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条规定的情形包括案情重大复杂、可能逃跑或自杀、可能串供或伪造隐匿毁灭证据、可能有其他妨碍调查行为。被举报或没有借条，本身都不能替代这些条件。[7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>二、官方案例怎样区分借款与受贿\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】借款手续、真实需求、双方意思和履行过程需要一起审查；没有借条仍可核实借款，有借条也可能掩盖权钱交易。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国民法典》第六百六十八条对自然人之间借款另有约定保留例外，不能把未写借条直接理解为借款不存在。刑事判断则须回到《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十五条的受贿要件。[1][9]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最高人民法院《全国法院审理经济犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》第三部分第（六）项要求综合考察借款事由、款项去向、平时关系及经济往来、请托谋利、归还意思与行为、归还能力、未归还原因等。借条只是其中一部分。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）没有借条的五十余万元借款 未因此认定受贿\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2026年4月8日《中国纪检监察报》“三堂会审”披露：水务局副局长张某向承包商袁某借款50余万元，未出具借条，口头约定尽快归还，数月后主动还清。参与分析人员结合真实周转需求、双方借款意思及无请托谋利等事实，将该笔评价为违反廉洁纪律，未认定受贿。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">全案另有受贿事实，张某最终被判有期徒刑十年，并处罚金100万元，判决已生效。该笔借款的评价不能扩大为全案无罪。对读者有用的是综合核验的方法，不能照搬该案结果。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）没有办成事 仍须检查是否存在权钱交易\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">受贿认定并不以请托事项最终办成为必要条件。2016年司法解释第十三条将实际或者承诺谋利、明知具体请托、基于此前履职事由收受财物等纳入判断，并对特定上下级、行政管理关系下的收受财物规定了视为承诺谋利的条件。不能只用“我没替他办成什么事”排除风险。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">反过来，双方有项目关系也不能省略对真实借贷的审查。若二十万元最终被认定为受贿，依该解释第二条属于数额巨大；前提仍是款项性质及犯罪要件已经得到证明，不能先看金额就作有罪结论。[1][3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>三、团队案例怎样审查资金性质争议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】可以借鉴账目与资金性质的审查方法，但必须把提出过什么意见、最终获得什么结果分开。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的Z某单位行贿案中，Z某为公司法定代表人，一审被判有期徒刑二年。团队在二审围绕公司账目、资金是否属于经营借贷及利息情况提出意见，同时就被索贿、退赃和认罪认罚等情节展开论证。最终二审改判有期徒刑二年、缓刑二年。[10]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该案最终仍作有罪处理。可借鉴的工作是：确认资金往来存在之后，继续核对用途、约定和业务关系，并把性质争议与从宽情节分别评估。它是付款方的单位行贿案件，与公职人员收款被举报的身份、要件和阶段不同，不能据此预测无罪或缓刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">回到这二十万元，谈话前最有用的准备，是把每一项事实与现有记录对上：哪句话是当时说的，哪笔钱后来付给谁，哪项工程由本人负责。律师应基于这些真实信息判断，不应替当事人创造借贷理由。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>四、谈话前 把四组事实与材料核对清楚\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】一份说明应当能被核实。原始材料能证明到哪里，就说明到哪里；缺失部分如实标明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）审查要点一 当时是否确有借款需求和约定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对何时提出借款、为何需要二十万元、对方如何答复，是否谈过期限、利息或分期。将借款前后的完整聊天与购房合同、付款通知、当时可支配资金比对，检查需求、数额、时间能否对应。口头约定可以如实说明，记不准的不能补成确定内容。依据是《纪要》的借款事由审查及民法典的形式规则。[2][9]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）审查要点二 二十万元实际用到了哪里\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将承包商转入、本人账户中转、向开发商付款的流水依次排列，注明账户持有人与交易时间。若混有其他资金，应区分各笔来源和支出，不用一张相近日期的购房收据代替完整核对。真实购房用途能解释资金需求，但借款和贿款都可能被用于购房，仍需结合双方约定判断。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）审查要点三 当时是否准备还 后来怎样履行\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对借款时的收入、资产与负债，已经发生的催还、延期、部分归还及资金来源。将当时的还款承诺与银行记录比对，不能只拿今天有钱说明当年一定准备还。长期未还的，应说清是否到期、为何延期、对方如何反应；没有催款不能单独推出“对方就是送钱”。这些均属《纪要》要求综合判断的事实。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现在补写情况说明，应标明实际形成日期，分清“回忆的事实”和“现存原始记录”，不能倒签冒充旧借条。已经属于受贿的，为掩饰犯罪而退还不影响认定；正常偿还真实债务与退缴涉嫌违法所得也应分别处理。是否现在付款、向谁付款、怎样留存手续，应结合是否已调查、款项争议及账户状态核实。[6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（四）审查要点四 朋友关系中是否夹有职务利益\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将认识经过、以往互借记录与任职文件、工程审批及验收记录对照，核对本人能影响哪些事项，借款前后对方提出过什么要求，本人承诺或实施过什么。既不能只说“多年朋友”跳过职权关系，也不能凭承包商身份就推定这笔钱属于受贿。[1][2][3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">即使最终确认具有归还本意，对党员而言，向管理服务对象借款、可能影响公正执行公务，仍需依《中国共产党纪律处分条例》第九十九条评价。无息本身不能单独定罪，但是否因职权获得异常便利，仍需结合交往和履职事实核对。[4][9]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>五、本人和家属现在可以依法做什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】先保全已有记录、核实待说明事实，再判断提交和处理路径；不要为填补材料空缺而制造新的记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）谈话前 本人先列一页时间线\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">按借款提出、约定、转入、使用、催还、归还、得知举报的顺序记录，每项附现有材料位置。注明哪些亲历、哪些听说、哪些尚需核实。本人可带着这份清单咨询律师，先判断款项性质、职权关系和需要说明的缺口，不把清单当作背诵口径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）谈话中 按事实回答并认真核对记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">听清所问的是收款事实、借款约定还是工程事项，分别如实说明。记不清的日期和原话应说明记忆范围；对已有资料可明确提出查核线索。核对笔录中金额、人物、先后顺序及“借”“送”“不用还”等关键表述，发现与实际陈述不符，及时提出更正，不能为了快结束而确认不实内容。[7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）家属 保存依法持有的材料并标明来源\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可整理依法持有的购房合同、家庭付款凭据、共同账户流水和已收到的通知，用于说明需求、资金去向及当前阶段。保留原件、原手机和完整上下文，副本另作标注；他人账户、内部工程资料等线索交由律师评估合法核查路径，不冒用身份获取资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（四）律师工作 按监察与司法阶段分别核对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察调查阶段，可以咨询风险、核对真实材料及申诉控告事项；聘请律师并不当然取得会见被留置人、查阅监察案卷的权限。若已留置，本人及近亲属依法享有申请变更措施的权利，应核对具体理由和通知，不能直接套用公安侦查中的取保流程。[7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">移送检察院审查起诉后，辩护律师可以依《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第四十条阅卷，将借贷说明同在案言词、流水和项目材料比对，依法提交意见。有罪举证责任及定罪证明标准不因当事人拿不出借条而降低。[8]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要停止的行为包括倒签或伪造借条、编造催还聊天、安排资金循环冒充旧还款、要求对方改口，以及删除或转移相关证据。家属依法咨询、正常沟通和如实提交材料，可以按合法渠道进行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在成都寻求这类咨询时，可围绕二十万元的原始记录与当前通知，向由成安律师领衔的卓安刑事风控委员会咨询：哪些事实尚未查清、材料能说明什么、下一步可怎样依法处理。先完成一页时间线，再讨论具体服务范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>附 卓安在本问题上的服务积累与刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：团队长期办理受贿、行贿等职务犯罪案件。前述Z某案中对公司账目及资金性质的审查，可为借贷往来核验提供工作经验；个案结果不能作为其他案件的处理承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专业协作：团队结合检察、审判等不同专业背景开展研判，重点核对资金事实、职权关系与证据之间能否相互印证，避免只凭一张借条或一次转账下结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，设有公职人员风控部、专项风控部等业务部门。针对无借条往来被举报的场景，可就真实材料整理、纪律与刑事风险区分、谈话前事实核对提供咨询；具体工作范围依程序阶段和委托约定确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>来源索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1] 《中华人民共和国刑法》第九十三条、第三百八十五条、第三百八十六条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2] 最高人民法院《全国法院审理经济犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》（法〔2003〕167号）第三部分第（六）项。核对载体：最高人民检察院网站《如何认定借款型受贿犯罪》（2016年10月23日）。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3] 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2016〕9号）第二条、第十三条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4] 《中国共产党纪律处分条例》（2023年修订）第九十九条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5] 《中国纪检监察报》2026年4月8日《三堂会审丨借用及收受管理和服务对象钱款的纪法罪辨析》，张某案。中央纪委国家监委网站发布的案例解析，非指导性案例。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6] 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》（法发〔2007〕22号）第九部分。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[7] 《中华人民共和国监察法》（2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行）第二十四条、第三十六条、第四十三条、第五十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[8] 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》（2018年修正）第四十条、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十五条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[9] 《中华人民共和国民法典》第六百六十八条、第六百八十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文链接\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[10] 成安律师团队Z某单位行贿案经授权案例说明：二审改判有期徒刑二年、缓刑二年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">规范及公开资料核验至2026年11月13日。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-13 22:40:55",{"id":424,"createdAt":430,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":34,"code":431,"name":432,"icon":35,"sort":186,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":434,"description":435,"keywords":35,"canonical":436,"image":426,"jsonLd":437},"公职人员借了承包商二十万元没借条 被举报受贿怎么办？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】没有借条，不等于二十万元就是受贿；有转账和买房记录，也不足以单独证明真实借款。应核对当时为何借、怎么约定、钱用到哪里、是否准备归还，以及承包商与本人职权之间的关系。 现行规则和公开案例均要求综合判断。即使不构成受贿，向管理服务对象借款仍可能存在纪律风险。团队案件也提示，资金性质的辩护意见与法院最终","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1569",[438],{"@context":378,"@graph":439},[440,447],{"@type":441,"@id":436,"url":436,"headline":425,"description":435,"datePublished":442,"dateModified":443,"author":444,"publisher":445,"articleSection":432,"inLanguage":383,"image":446},"Article","2026-11-13T22:40:55+08:00","2026-11-13T22:43:26+08:00",{"@id":385},{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F1687aabc-640d-470c-8299-0a632dc608e1.jpg",{"@type":448,"itemListElement":449},"BreadcrumbList",[450,453,455],{"@type":451,"position":6,"name":452,"item":375},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":451,"position":41,"name":432,"item":454},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":451,"position":38,"name":425,"item":436}]