[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1570":420},{"entity":4,"seo":372},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":198,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":248,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":315,"serviceTags":316,"serviceCategories":317,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":348,"homeStats":349,"serviceProducts":362},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,136,141,146,153,158,162,167,172,176,181,189,193],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},918,"D某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨清瑶律师为其辩护，判处有期徒刑三年六个月，并处罚金126万元（缓刑未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平）​","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fc40c2125-1df9-4ed8-9d5b-92c48e48aba9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：侵犯公民个人信息罪 结果：判处三年六个月，并处126万元（未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平） 亮点： 精准定性争议：成功驳斥方关于获利金额的指控（从218万元降至125万元），直接影响量刑基准。 ",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":128,"summary":129,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},917,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功争取取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2f3436fc-d30e-4b14-89ad-b7460107338c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名：诈骗罪 （资金盘） 结果： 吸粉引流类诈骗，30天成功争取 取保候审 亮点： 多次诉讼辅导、办案单位有效沟通；公安机关采纳律师意见； 焦点： 主观明知时间、程度；本案中的地位、作用； 案例综述： 先说以下涉案","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},916,"x某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国边境罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队为其辩护，获轻判","一、【案情简述】 2019年4月，当事人持护照由成都飞抵柬埔寨从事“炒群”工作，同年8月回国，在境外诈骗窝点累计三个月，获利23500元，期间被害人被诈骗68万余元。 二、【辩护思路】 晏律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往羁押地会见当事",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":139,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},915,"X 某某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国（边）境罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功打掉诈骗罪，刑期大幅降低","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2e058be9-53ca-4220-9651-8ac5cfb55285.png","一、案件核心信息 · 罪名 ： 诈骗罪 、偷越国（边）境罪 · 辩护结果 ：律师成功打掉诈骗罪，仅以偷越国（边）境罪起诉，大幅降低刑期 · 案件亮点 ：精准打掉重罪指控；区分主观明知与被胁迫情形；在校大学生涉案从轻处理 · 封面语 ：X 某",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},914,"X 某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F004d7c52-4b16-4b8a-a67d-5394769a116f.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，X 某某成功 取保候审 案件亮点 ：在前期辩护未达预期后，律师介入实现取保候审突破；检察院认可从宽处理情节 封面语 ：X 某某轻信朋友出借银行卡并协助取现，涉",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},913,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金罪、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队律律师为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F86207993-8a55-4116-b332-acea52d593d4.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任S社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服务的Z综合服务中心和X综合服务中心两家民办非企业单位属于社区的资金19.2888万元占为已有并予以挥霍。2022","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":10,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":179,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ",{"id":182,"title":183,"thumbnail":184,"summary":185,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":194,"title":195,"thumbnail":196,"summary":197,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",[199,202,207,210,215,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":152,"name":151,"summary":200,"keywords":201},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":203,"name":204,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":216,"name":217,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":186,"code":188,"name":187,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":243,"lawyer":247},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[244],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[249,252,271,284,297],{"id":234,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":250},[251],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":253,"createdAt":241,"updatedAt":241,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":254,"city":255,"caseType":256,"title":257,"thumbnail":258,"content":10,"publishTime":259,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":260,"lawyers":261},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[262,265,270],{"id":254,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":264,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":266,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":268,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":269,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":272,"createdAt":273,"updatedAt":273,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":274,"city":275,"caseType":276,"title":277,"thumbnail":278,"content":10,"publishTime":279,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":280,"lawyers":281},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[282],{"id":274,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":280,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":283,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":285,"createdAt":286,"updatedAt":286,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":287,"city":288,"caseType":289,"title":290,"thumbnail":291,"content":10,"publishTime":292,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":293,"lawyers":294},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[295],{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":293,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":296,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":298,"createdAt":299,"updatedAt":299,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":300,"city":301,"caseType":302,"title":303,"thumbnail":304,"content":10,"publishTime":305,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":306,"lawyers":307},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[308,311],{"id":300,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":312,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":313,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":314,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[318,323,328,333,338,343],{"id":43,"createdAt":319,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":34,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":327,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":34,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":332,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":334,"deleted":34,"code":335,"name":336,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":337,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":339,"updatedAt":340,"deleted":34,"code":341,"name":342,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":344,"updatedAt":345,"deleted":34,"code":346,"name":347,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[350,353,356,359],{"value":351,"label":352},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":354,"label":355},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":357,"label":358},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":360,"label":361},"6","全国分所",[363,366,369],{"title":364,"desc":365},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":367,"desc":368},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":370,"desc":371},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":373,"description":13,"keywords":374,"canonical":375,"image":10,"jsonLd":376},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[377],{"@context":378,"@graph":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[380,386],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"url":375,"name":7,"inLanguage":383,"publisher":384},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":387,"@id":385,"name":7,"url":375,"logo":388,"image":388,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":383,"address":389,"geo":392,"department":394},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":391},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":393,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[395,400,404,408,412,416],{"@type":396,"@id":397,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":401,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":405,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":409,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":413,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":417,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":418,"parentOrganization":419},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":385},{"entity":421,"seo":433},{"id":422,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":424,"title":425,"thumbnail":426,"content":427,"publishTime":428,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":429},1570,"2026-11-13 22:48:00",11,"公职人员：收供应商字画后怎样核实风险？十问十答","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F4f6ae8b1-7471-438f-a4ed-31f8bfa36fb0.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cstrong>公职人员：收供应商字画后怎样核实风险？十问十答\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">围绕十万元报价争议的材料与行动清单\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队\u003Cbr>四川卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">供应商说画值十万元，不能仅凭报价确定受贿数额；本人以为只值几千，也不能直接排除风险。2026年施行的贪污贿赂司法解释（二）（下称《2026年解释》）一般以收受时价值认定数额，字画应鉴真、通常还要认价。票据齐全且有效证明真实价格、双方无异议的例外，以及按本人授意购买的特别规则，须分别核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现在应保存原画、交付记录、购买线索和履职材料，分清当时认识与事后听说。不要卖画测价、补造低价票据或统一说法。是否涉嫌犯罪、是否可能留置，须分别判断。可以在成都咨询律师；监察阶段的咨询和材料整理，不等于已有一般会见、阅卷权。以下十问帮助本人和家属核对事实、准备材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【适用人群】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 收过供应商字画，近期被要求说明情况的公职人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 对真伪、价值或当年告知内容有疑问的人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 保管涉事画作，正在帮助整理材料的家属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、供应商说花了十万元 就会按十万元算吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不会仅凭一句报价自动确定数额。须核对实物、收受时价值，以及是否存在授意购买等特别情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《2026年解释》第十一条、第十二条分别规定价值时点、鉴真认价和授意购买的计算规则。对方所说十万元，可能是标价、发票价或实付款，证明内容不同。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">D某受贿案二审排除了其中50万元指控，说明总金额中的具体项目需要单独审查。该案不涉及字画，不能据此推定本题也会核减。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把十万元说法的来源、提出时间和对应凭据记清，保存合法持有的原始聊天、票据及画作信息。下一步列出这个数字尚未得到哪些材料印证，交由律师评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、画可能是假的 是不是就没有受贿风险？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">赝品不能直接等同于零价值或无责任。先鉴别真伪，再结合价格、收受性质和本人认识判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">字画属于《2026年解释》第十二条明确列举的特定财物，应进行真伪鉴定；价格认定另行核对。即使物品实际价值较低，仍要审查有无授意购买等情形，纪律责任也需分别评价。[3][7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">张化为案公开报道确认字画可以成为受贿财物，但未公开逐幅鉴真、估价细节。其结论不能回答手中画作的真假和价格。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保存落款、印章、装裱、尺寸及来源记录，注明已有证书由谁出具、何时取得。下一步提交具体鉴真疑问，不找人出具迎合结论的证明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、对方拿出十万元发票 就不用再认价了吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">有发票只是其中一个条件。票据齐全、有效证明收受时真实价格、双方无异议，须同时满足。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《2026年解释》第十二条第二款规定的是不作价格认定的例外，不是免除字画真伪鉴定。本人有具体价格异议，应如实提出，不能将无条件认可价格当作“配合”的要求。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该条规则本身表明，票据能证明什么，需要结合真实价格与双方意见判断，不能把收据上的数字直接当成全部事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对照票据上的作者、名称、尺寸、日期与原物，核对付款和退款线索。无法合法取得对方记录的，列明调取线索。下一步写出具体不对应处，避免只有笼统否认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、我让供应商买的画 价格规则会不一样吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可能不同。行贿人按收受人授意购买特定物品后给予的，适用实际支付购买金额的特别规则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《2026年解释》第十二条第三款要求核实授意购买、特定物品和实际付款。介绍过自己的爱好，是否已构成对特定物品的购买授意，要回到具体表达与行为，不能两者直接画等号。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该款在一般采用认定价格的规则之外设置例外。因此，不能只拿较低的认价结果忽略实际购买安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保存指定作者、作品、购买渠道和付款安排的完整记录，也保留取消、退款等实际情况。下一步按时间整理指示与执行过程，不删除不利内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、我一直以为只值几千元 谈话时怎样说明？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如实说明当时知道什么、依据是什么。不知精确价格，不当然排除受贿故意，也不能用事后低价判断替代当时认识。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">是否按特定数额承担责任，需要综合收受经过、当时告知内容、票据展示及本人行为。实施条例第六十七条、第六十八条要求用全案证据查证，不以单句陈述代替核实。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">D某案只说明具体金额可以依法审查，不说明本人说“不知道”就足以排除指控，更不能将借款争议的结论直接套入画作价格认识。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">区分当年听到的介绍与现在的转述，找出当时形成的聊天、照片等资料。下一步写明确定与不确定部分；核对笔录，及时反映将“后来听说”误记为“当年明知”的具体出入。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、没有替供应商违规办事 收画还会有风险吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">仍需核对。谋利不只包括已经违规办成的事，承诺、明知具体请托以及基于既往履职收财等也在审查范围内。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">刑法第三百八十五条及2016年解释第十三条规定相关条件。是否供应商、是否朋友都不能单独决定性质。还须审查本人身份、职权与送画原因。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">张化为案认定受贿，依据是利用职务便利为他人提供帮助并收财，而非单纯因为拥有字画。该案不能替代对本人的逐项判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将收画日期同项目、采购、验收、结算对应，准备合法掌握的职责与履职材料。下一步列出本人参与环节和具体请托，不用“项目合规”一句话概括全部过程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、画还在家里 能不能先卖掉看看真实价格？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不要为验证价格而出售或典当涉事画作。商家收购报价不能直接替代案件价格认定，处置原物也可能影响核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察法第十八条禁止伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据，第二十八条规定涉案财物登记和保管。已被查封扣押的物品不得擅自处置；尚在家中的，也应先保留现状并依法说明。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《2026年解释》要求围绕具体财物鉴真认价。出售、修复或调换导致对象变化后，原来那幅画的状态可能更难核实。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">登记当前地点、保管人、原有特征和已发生的流转。下一步保存原物与既有记录；已出售的，如实整理成交、付款和去向，不编造丢失经过。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>八、现在把画退给供应商 或主动上交就没事了吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能保证。及时退还、上交与因相关人事被查处而为掩饰犯罪退还、上交，法律评价不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2007年两机关意见第九部分作了区分。现在要核对首次收受、获知核查、提出退还及实际交付的时间和原因，不能只凭最终已经退了下结论。[6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">张化为案赃物全部追缴，被作为从轻情节考虑，法院仍判处受贿罪。该案说明退缴与否定犯罪是不同事项，不能推导退画必然免责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">整理原有退还记录和当前退缴意愿，依法确认接收渠道，保留清单与接收凭据。下一步让律师评估真实时间线和办理路径，不以私下退画换取对方改口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>九、价格还没查清 会不会先被留置？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能因价格未定就保证不会留置，也不能因通知谈话就认定一定留置。措施条件与最终定罪标准不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察法第二十四条要求涉嫌严重职务违法或职务犯罪，已有部分事实证据，重要问题待查，并具备案情重大复杂、可能逃跑自杀、串供毁证或其他妨碍调查等法定情形且依法审批。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">实施条例第七十条要求移送起诉的犯罪事实达到证据确实充分、排除合理怀疑的标准。这不能反过来替代留置的法定条件。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保存现有通知，核对联系机关、本人身份、时间及要求携带的资料。下一步按真实情形咨询措施风险；如已留置，家属另行整理通知、健康信息及有关申请事由，不打探或统一证言。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>十、现在在成都找律师 能具体帮我核对什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以咨询收受性质、价格疑点、材料保存、如实陈述及退缴路径。监察调查期间，不应把这些工作理解为律师已能一般性会见或阅卷。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">律师法第三十一条规定咨询及非诉法律服务范围；会见、阅卷仍依程序阶段适用。移送审查起诉后，辩护律师依刑事诉讼法第四十条依法阅卷，进一步审查鉴定、认价与指控证据。[8][9]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">D某案二审围绕具体50万元争议形成了处理结果，体现的是针对证据和事实提出意见。不能将该结果改写成监察阶段就有相同权限或一定核减成功。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人及家属应核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">向卓安刑事风控委员会咨询时，可先准备一页收受经过、价格凭据及现有通知。下一步确认当前最紧迫的问题、材料缺口和委托范围，具体工作与反馈按约定办理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>当前情况与工作对照\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"90\">当前情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">需要核对\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">可依法评估的工作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">本人或家属配合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"90\">尚未谈话\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">收画与履职时间、已有通知\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">风险咨询、事实及价格疑点整理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">保留原物和完整记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"90\">监察调查中\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">物品登记、已知认价问题及现有措施\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">咨询、说明材料和退缴路径评估\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">如实配合，记录具体异议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"90\">移送审查起诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">鉴定与认价依据、证据关联\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">辩护律师依法阅卷并提出意见\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">依法提供原有材料和调取线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>材料清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">具体材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">核实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">整理提醒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">实物特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">原画、包装、旧照片、证书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">确认同一物品及原有状态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">不拆裱修复或调换\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">交付经过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">完整聊天、交付时间与保管记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">确认收受、告知和流转\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">区分亲历与转述\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">购买与付款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">已有票据、付款及退款记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">核对实际价格与授意购买\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">无权取得的只列线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">履职事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">职责、授权、相关项目记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">核对职权及请托关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">依法获取，遵守保密要求\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">退缴过程\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">原有退还记录、物品清单与收据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">核对时间、原因和实际交付\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">注明真实形成日期\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"79\">程序材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">谈话通知、扣押清单、留置通知等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">判断当前阶段与可用程序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">仅整理实际收到的文件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六个常见误区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. “对方报十万元就定十万元”：报价须与实物、时点和付款相互核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. “有发票就不用鉴定”：不作认价的例外有完整条件，并未取消字画鉴真。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. “我说只值几千就只算几千”：当时认识须有事实支持，不能自行限定责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4. “现在卖得便宜就能证明当年便宜”：一般价值时点是收受时，授意购买另有规则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5. “把画退了就没有问题”：应核对退还原因和时间，退缴不等于当然免责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6. “这幅不到三万元就绝对安全”：还需核对其他收受、法定情节及纪律责任。[2][7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>与律师沟通时核对的三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 当前最需要判断的是收受性质、价格、当时认识，还是措施风险，分别缺哪些事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 哪些材料已合法掌握，哪些只能提供线索由有权机关调取，实物怎样保管。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 下一步能开展什么工作，提交给谁，受什么程序条件限制，以及按约定怎样反馈。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要避免的高风险行为：调换画作、倒签或虚开低价凭据、删除原始记录、联系供应商统一说法、以退画换取改口。合法咨询、依法提交材料和如实提出价格异议可以进行，不能将正常行使权利等同于对抗调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>相关案例简表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">已核实情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"238\">能说明的范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">张化为受贿案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">收受字画等财物，一审十二年，并处罚金二百万元\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"238\">礼品形式不排除受贿；不证明本题应认价多少\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">团队D某受贿案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">一审六年；二审排除50万元指控，改判二年六个月\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"238\">具体金额应逐项审查；不属于字画估价案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>附 服务积累与卓安刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：卓安团队累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件，D某案提供了具体金额争议的审查经验。团队通过案件研讨与证据审查机制，将物品、价格、收受与职权问题分别核对，为当前风险咨询及后续辩护提供支持。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师领衔，可围绕本题开展礼品来源、价格疑点和谈话前材料整理的咨询。首次沟通可从一页事实清单和现有凭据开始；具体承办、工作与反馈范围以正式委托和法定权限为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">面对价值争议，先把原物留住、事实写准，再依法核实。不要为尽快得到一个“安全数字”，改变画作或记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法规与案例来源\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国刑法》第九十三条、第三百八十五条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，法释〔2016〕9号，第一条、第十三条、第十五条；2016年4月18日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（二）》，法释〔2026〕6号，第十一条、第十二条；2026年5月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《中华人民共和国监察法》（2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行）第十八条、第二十四条、第二十八条、第三十条、第五十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》（2025年修订）第六十六条至第七十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6]最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》，法发〔2007〕22号，2007年7月8日印发，第九部分。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[7]《中国共产党纪律处分条例》（2023年修订，2024年1月1日起施行）第九十七条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[8]《中华人民共和国律师法》（2026年修正）第三十一条、第三十六条、第三十七条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[9]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》（2018年修正）第四十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[10]最高人民法院网站2019年5月27日公开报道《中央巡视组原副部级巡视专员张化为受贿案一审宣判》。 \u003C\u002Fspan>原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">D某案例依据经授权的脱敏办案说明整理，未公开案号；其事实与处理结果与配套深度解析一致。团队服务数据依据本次确认的对外口径。法律及公开案例核验截至2026年11月13日。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。团队案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-13 22:43:36",{"id":424,"createdAt":430,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":34,"code":431,"name":432,"icon":35,"sort":186,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":434,"description":435,"keywords":35,"canonical":436,"image":426,"jsonLd":437},"公职人员：收供应商字画后怎样核实风险？十问十答 - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","公职人员：收供应商字画后怎样核实风险？十问十答 围绕十万元报价争议的材料与行动清单 成安律师团队 四川卓安律师事务所 【核心结论】 供应商说画值十万元，不能仅凭报价确定受贿数额；本人以为只值几千，也不能直接排除风险。2026年施行的贪污贿赂司法解释（二）（下称《2026年解释》）一般以收受时价值认定数额，字画应鉴真、通","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1570",[438],{"@context":378,"@graph":439},[440,447],{"@type":441,"@id":436,"url":436,"headline":425,"description":435,"datePublished":442,"dateModified":443,"author":444,"publisher":445,"articleSection":432,"inLanguage":383,"image":446},"Article","2026-11-13T22:43:36+08:00","2026-11-13T22:48:00+08:00",{"@id":385},{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F4f6ae8b1-7471-438f-a4ed-31f8bfa36fb0.jpg",{"@type":448,"itemListElement":449},"BreadcrumbList",[450,453,455],{"@type":451,"position":6,"name":452,"item":375},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":451,"position":41,"name":432,"item":454},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":451,"position":38,"name":425,"item":436}]