[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1572":420},{"entity":4,"seo":372},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":198,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":248,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":315,"serviceTags":316,"serviceCategories":317,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":348,"homeStats":349,"serviceProducts":362},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,136,141,146,153,158,162,167,172,176,181,189,193],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},918,"D某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨清瑶律师为其辩护，判处有期徒刑三年六个月，并处罚金126万元（缓刑未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平）​","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fc40c2125-1df9-4ed8-9d5b-92c48e48aba9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：侵犯公民个人信息罪 结果：判处三年六个月，并处126万元（未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平） 亮点： 精准定性争议：成功驳斥方关于获利金额的指控（从218万元降至125万元），直接影响量刑基准。 ",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":128,"summary":129,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},917,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功争取取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2f3436fc-d30e-4b14-89ad-b7460107338c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名：诈骗罪 （资金盘） 结果： 吸粉引流类诈骗，30天成功争取 取保候审 亮点： 多次诉讼辅导、办案单位有效沟通；公安机关采纳律师意见； 焦点： 主观明知时间、程度；本案中的地位、作用； 案例综述： 先说以下涉案","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},916,"x某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国边境罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队为其辩护，获轻判","一、【案情简述】 2019年4月，当事人持护照由成都飞抵柬埔寨从事“炒群”工作，同年8月回国，在境外诈骗窝点累计三个月，获利23500元，期间被害人被诈骗68万余元。 二、【辩护思路】 晏律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往羁押地会见当事",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":139,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},915,"X 某某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国（边）境罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功打掉诈骗罪，刑期大幅降低","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2e058be9-53ca-4220-9651-8ac5cfb55285.png","一、案件核心信息 · 罪名 ： 诈骗罪 、偷越国（边）境罪 · 辩护结果 ：律师成功打掉诈骗罪，仅以偷越国（边）境罪起诉，大幅降低刑期 · 案件亮点 ：精准打掉重罪指控；区分主观明知与被胁迫情形；在校大学生涉案从轻处理 · 封面语 ：X 某",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},914,"X 某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F004d7c52-4b16-4b8a-a67d-5394769a116f.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，X 某某成功 取保候审 案件亮点 ：在前期辩护未达预期后，律师介入实现取保候审突破；检察院认可从宽处理情节 封面语 ：X 某某轻信朋友出借银行卡并协助取现，涉",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},913,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金罪、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队律律师为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F86207993-8a55-4116-b332-acea52d593d4.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任S社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服务的Z综合服务中心和X综合服务中心两家民办非企业单位属于社区的资金19.2888万元占为已有并予以挥霍。2022","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":10,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":179,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ",{"id":182,"title":183,"thumbnail":184,"summary":185,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":194,"title":195,"thumbnail":196,"summary":197,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",[199,202,207,210,215,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":152,"name":151,"summary":200,"keywords":201},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":203,"name":204,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":216,"name":217,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":186,"code":188,"name":187,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":243,"lawyer":247},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[244],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[249,252,271,284,297],{"id":234,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":250},[251],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":253,"createdAt":241,"updatedAt":241,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":254,"city":255,"caseType":256,"title":257,"thumbnail":258,"content":10,"publishTime":259,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":260,"lawyers":261},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[262,265,270],{"id":254,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":264,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":266,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":268,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":269,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":272,"createdAt":273,"updatedAt":273,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":274,"city":275,"caseType":276,"title":277,"thumbnail":278,"content":10,"publishTime":279,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":280,"lawyers":281},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[282],{"id":274,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":280,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":283,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":285,"createdAt":286,"updatedAt":286,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":287,"city":288,"caseType":289,"title":290,"thumbnail":291,"content":10,"publishTime":292,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":293,"lawyers":294},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[295],{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":293,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":296,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":298,"createdAt":299,"updatedAt":299,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":300,"city":301,"caseType":302,"title":303,"thumbnail":304,"content":10,"publishTime":305,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":306,"lawyers":307},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[308,311],{"id":300,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":312,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":313,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":314,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[318,323,328,333,338,343],{"id":43,"createdAt":319,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":34,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":327,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":34,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":332,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":334,"deleted":34,"code":335,"name":336,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":337,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":339,"updatedAt":340,"deleted":34,"code":341,"name":342,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":344,"updatedAt":345,"deleted":34,"code":346,"name":347,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[350,353,356,359],{"value":351,"label":352},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":354,"label":355},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":357,"label":358},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":360,"label":361},"6","全国分所",[363,366,369],{"title":364,"desc":365},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":367,"desc":368},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":370,"desc":371},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":373,"description":13,"keywords":374,"canonical":375,"image":10,"jsonLd":376},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[377],{"@context":378,"@graph":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[380,386],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"url":375,"name":7,"inLanguage":383,"publisher":384},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":387,"@id":385,"name":7,"url":375,"logo":388,"image":388,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":383,"address":389,"geo":392,"department":394},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":391},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":393,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[395,400,404,408,412,416],{"@type":396,"@id":397,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":401,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":405,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":409,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":413,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":417,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":418,"parentOrganization":419},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":385},{"entity":421,"seo":433},{"id":422,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":424,"title":425,"thumbnail":426,"content":427,"publishTime":428,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":429},1572,"2026-11-13 22:56:23",11,"公职人员谈话被说“认了就不查家属” 十问十答","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fbefec6f2-d384-42a7-866a-605ebe50f92a.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】公职人员说明项目往来时，遇到“认了就不查家属”之类的话，不应为保护家人承认没有发生的事实。家属责任应按其自身行为和证据判断；正常核查与非法施压，要结合具体言行、强度及陈述形成过程区分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">当下应如实说明亲历事实，记不清的明确记忆边界；核对笔录，纠正遗漏和差错；已经说错的逐项补充更正；把涉嫌非法取证的人员、时间、地点、方式和内容整理为线索，依法反映。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以找律师咨询，但监察调查阶段不能直接套用刑事侦查的会见、阅卷和取保候审规则。家属合法咨询、保存材料和依法申诉，可与配合调查并行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">适用人群\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 说明项目、资金往来，担心家属受牵连的公职人员、国企管理人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 需核对笔录或补充更正陈述的本人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 需整理材料、咨询律师或依法申诉的近亲属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一、能不能先认下来，换家属不被查？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】不能把不实承认作为保护家属的办法。自己多认一件事，不会使家属本来需要核实的问题当然消失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】《中华人民共和国监察法》第十八条要求如实提供情况。已发生的如实说明，没有发生的不能编造；是否处理家属，应按其具体行为和证据依法判断，不能由一句谈话承诺保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】同法第三十六条要求依法审查证据。陈述可能与其他材料一并用于案件处置，不能把“先认后改”当成没有后果的临时选择。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】本人列清被要求承认的具体事项、真实经过及可核对的凭据；家属只整理其合法持有、亲历的部分。下一步先把存在争议的事实逐项核清，不商量统一说法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">二、说要查我爱人，就一定属于非法取证吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】不一定。依法核实家属情况，与以严重损害近亲属合法权益相威胁，是不同情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十一条禁止非法取证；第七十二条的威胁排除规则，还要求审查具体手段及其是否使人遭受难以忍受的痛苦、违背意愿作出有关陈述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】条例把取证行为的禁止要求与具体证据的排除条件分别规定，说明“感觉紧张”不能代替对方法、强度和影响的核实；没有殴打也不能直接排除违法可能。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】记录原话或大意、提出的具体后果、持续过程和当时反应，标明记忆不确定处。下一步把可核实细节交律师评估，不先给所有谈话人员贴违法标签。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">三、家属确实经手过钱，我该怎样说明？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】按各人亲历事实说明。不能替家属承认自己不了解的行为，也不能隐瞒自己确实知情、参与的部分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】亲属关系不能代替对行为和证据的审查。要区分谁收钱、谁决定用途、本人何时知情，以及钱款与履职事项的关系。存在资金往来，也不等于其性质已经认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】团队X某某贪污、受贿案通过账目与实际用途的核对提出意见，二审由八年九个月改判六年六个月。它说明应核实具体资金事实，不能证明任何家属经手都无责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】依法保存原始流水、对应合同、完整会话和用途凭据，分别标注谁提供、证明哪件事。下一步制作逐笔清单；不补造借条，不删除往来，不互相补齐记忆。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">四、当场紧张、记不清，怎样避免越说越乱？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】如实说明记忆范围，不用猜测填空。不能为了让回答显得连贯，把听说、推测写成亲眼所见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】应配合依法开展的调查，如实说明情况；对确实不清楚、需核对账目的事项，说明原因和可核查材料。谈话中存在真实健康、休息需要的，应及时提出。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十四条要求合理安排谈话时间、控制时长，保证饮食和必要休息；第八十五条要求笔录如实反映谈话情况。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】谈话前将项目时间、职责、经手事项与凭据对应。依法能够保存的诊疗和用药材料可用于说明实际健康需要。下一步逐件核对，不背统一回答，也不编造病情。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">五、笔录把我的话记错了，还要签字吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】先指出具体遗漏、差错并要求补充更正，核对无误后逐页签名、捺指印。不要为尽快结束而确认不准确的内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十五条规定了谈话笔录核对、更正和签名程序。重点检查人物、金额、时间和信息来源，也要检查“不确定”等限定是否被省略。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】条例同时规定，拒绝签名、捺指印的，调查人员应记明。这意味着拒签不自动消除笔录，具体差错及形成过程仍须核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】本人指出具体内容及正确事实；能够依法提交补充说明时，写清对应谈话和更正事项。家属不能要求取得本来无权获取的笔录。下一步保存依法取得的提交凭证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">六、已经说错、已经签字，还能更正吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以依法提出补充、更正，签字不使错误事实变成真实；但事后改述也不会自动推翻原笔录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】应说明哪项不准确、正确事实是什么、此前为什么说错，并接受核查。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十六条规定，被调查人请求自行书写说明材料的，应当准许。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】团队X某某案的事实核对并非只靠一句否认，而是逐笔账目、真实用途及相关材料。对本问的启示是用可核对内容解释差异，不是为了前后一致继续维持错误。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】制作“原陈述事项、正确事实、错误原因、对应凭据”的清单，写真实形成日期；受压经过另列。下一步依法提交并保留记录，不倒签，不约他人修改证言配合。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">七、我没拿到录音录像，还能反映被施压吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以提出具体线索，不必把取得完整录像当成求助的前提；是否存在录像、如何调取，需依法核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十三条规定，提供涉嫌非法取证的人员、时间、地点、方式和内容等材料或者线索的，应当受理、审核。仅说“压力很大”通常不能充分定位问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】该条设置了受理审核、必要时调查核实的路径，说明线索与最终证明并非同一要求。不是每类谈话都当然适用相同录音录像规则，也不能承诺家属必能拿到录像。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】本人写亲历经过；家属标明哪些为转述。保存合法取得的通知、提交记录、相关诊疗材料，指出需要核查的时段。下一步依法提出核实请求，不冒用账号或擅取内部资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">八、本人或家属可以向哪里反映，期限怎么算？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】针对非法取证线索，可依法控告、举报；属于侵犯被调查人合法权益的，可核对适用申诉程序。不同路径不能混算期限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】《中华人民共和国监察法》第六十九条允许被调查人及其近亲属、利害关系人就法定侵权情形向该机关申诉。处理期自受理日起一个月；不服的，收到决定日起一个月内向上一级申请复查，上一级收到申请日起二个月内处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十三条另规定非法取证控告、举报的核查，不能把上述期限一概套给所有举报。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】整理身份关系、事件经过、具体请求及线索，保留递交、受理和送达材料。下一步先确定适用渠道与起算凭据，不把寄出日期自动当作受理日期。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">九、不认可错误事实、依法申诉，会不会就被留置？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】不能把依法更正、申诉与必然留置画等号；也不能因此保证不会留置，仍须核对案件事实和法定条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条要求审查严重职务违法或职务犯罪嫌疑、已掌握的部分事实证据、待查重要问题，以及案情重大复杂、可能串供或毁灭证据等法定情形，并依法审批。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】同法第六十九条确认申诉权。依法反映具体问题与拒不配合、提供虚假情况不同，不能因担心留置而放弃如实说明，也不能以申诉名义干扰调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】整理合法取得的措施文书、被要求说明的事项和已提交材料。下一步请律师判断所处阶段；不向相关人打探口供，不转移涉案财物，不相信付费保证不留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">十、现在能找律师吗，成都的律师能具体帮什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以咨询。先明确当前是监察调查还是已移送审查起诉，再确定律师权限、具体工作和委托范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】监察调查阶段可围绕风险、准确陈述、笔录更正和申诉材料提供法律服务，不能直接套用普通刑事侦查的会见、阅卷或取保规则。移送后，辩护律师依《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十九条、第四十条等开展工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】团队X某某案体现的是证据逐笔核对能力。卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师领衔，可围绕本题梳理事实与合法反映路径，不能保证笔录排除或家属免责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】咨询前带谈话经过、争议事项、合法持有的通知和相关凭据。成都有需要的本人或家属，可向四川卓安律师事务所咨询，核对负责律师、阶段权限及可约定的书面成果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">程序与工作对照\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">当前阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">先核实什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">律师可依法评估的工作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">本人或家属配合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">谈话前后\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">身份、事项、是否已立案及措施\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">核对事实、解释权利、梳理更正事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">保存真实记录，不猜测补全\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">监察调查中\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">具体施压线索及适用渠道\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">依委托整理申诉、控告等材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">区分亲历转述，保留提交凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">移送审查起诉后\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">受理机关、辩护委托、案卷内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">依法会见阅卷，核对取证过程、提出意见\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">提交合法持有材料，不索取全套工作底稿\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">审判中\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">排除申请的线索、材料及程序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">依法申请审查证据合法性并质证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">如实补充事实，不预设结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">咨询前的材料清单\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"105\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">整理提醒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"105\">谈话经过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">人员、时段、地点、原话或大意\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">定位涉嫌施压的具体线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">注明形成日期及记忆边界\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"105\">更正事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">错误内容、正确事实、此前错误原因\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">解释前后陈述差异\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">只写真实情况，不倒签\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"105\">项目与资金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">履职文件、相关流水、合同、完整会话\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核对职责、往来和用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">合法持有，保留原始载体\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"105\">健康情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">相关诊疗、用药及提出需求的记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核对真实身体状况和过程\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">限于相关内容，不编造\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"105\">程序凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">合法取得的通知、提交及受理送达记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">识别阶段、核对处理节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">不要求擅取内部案卷\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">六个容易误解的地方\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. “认了就能保家属”。家属责任仍须依法查清；不要用不实陈述换口头保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. “问到家属就是违法”。先核对是否为正常调查、具体言行是否侵害合法权益。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. “签字后再也不能说”。可以依法补充更正，但应说明差异和依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4. “拒签就没有这份证据”。拒签可被记明，仍需指出具体差错和形成问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5. “没有录像就不能反映”。可先提供具体线索，再依法请求核查相关材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6. “排除一份笔录就全案无罪”。仍须审查其他证据及其能否支持有关认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">与律师沟通时核对三件事\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 当前先要判断的是事实错误、疑似非法取证，还是家属自身行为风险；几个问题分开列。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 哪些材料已经合法持有，哪些需要由有权机关核查，不把内部案卷当成家属必交材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 下一步由谁提交什么、适用何种渠道和节点、依委托可反馈哪些书面内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要避免的具体行为\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不约他人统一说法，不补造、倒签凭据，不删改聊天或转账记录，不以投诉相要挟干扰他人作证。不付费托人保证“不查家属”。合法咨询、如实说明、保存真实材料及依法申诉，不应与这些行为混同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会的专业支撑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：卓安长期开展公职人员、国企管理人员刑事风控及职务犯罪辩护，服务覆盖风险识别、危机应对与后续司法程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">相关案例：团队X某某贪污、受贿案通过账目、用途及相关材料核对提出意见，二审由八年九个月改判六年六个月；其意义限于事实与证据核对，不是本题非法取证的处理先例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，针对本题可协助梳理谈话前后事实、识别取证疑点和适用的反映渠道。咨询时宜带一份经过记录、一份更正清单及相关原始凭据，具体工作依法并依委托确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法律依据与官方来源\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 《中华人民共和国监察法》：2024年12月25日修正，相关修改自2025年6月1日起施行。本文涉及第十八条、第二十四条、第三十六条、第四十三条第二款、第六十九条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》：2025年4月27日修订，国家监察委员会公告第2号公布，自2025年6月1日起施行。本文涉及第七十一条至第七十三条、第八十四条至第八十六条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》：2018年修正。本文涉及第三十九条、第四十条及第五十六条至第六十条；会见、阅卷等权限须结合具体程序适用。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">规范核对日期：2026年11月13日。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">结语\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">担心家属时，先把需要说明的真实事实列清，把疑似施压的具体经过另行整理。让事实能够核对，让异议有明确内容，是现在可以依法完成的第一步。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">免责声明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。具体取证行为及证据效力，应依法核查判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-13 22:56:05",{"id":424,"createdAt":430,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":34,"code":431,"name":432,"icon":35,"sort":186,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":434,"description":435,"keywords":35,"canonical":436,"image":426,"jsonLd":437},"公职人员谈话被说“认了就不查家属” 十问十答 - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【核心结论】公职人员说明项目往来时，遇到“认了就不查家属”之类的话，不应为保护家人承认没有发生的事实。家属责任应按其自身行为和证据判断；正常核查与非法施压，要结合具体言行、强度及陈述形成过程区分。 当下应如实说明亲历事实，记不清的明确记忆边界；核对笔录，纠正遗漏和差错；已经说错的逐项补充更正；把涉嫌非法取证的人员、时间","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1572",[438],{"@context":378,"@graph":439},[440,447],{"@type":441,"@id":436,"url":436,"headline":425,"description":435,"datePublished":442,"dateModified":443,"author":444,"publisher":445,"articleSection":432,"inLanguage":383,"image":446},"Article","2026-11-13T22:56:05+08:00","2026-11-13T22:56:23+08:00",{"@id":385},{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fbefec6f2-d384-42a7-866a-605ebe50f92a.jpg",{"@type":448,"itemListElement":449},"BreadcrumbList",[450,453,455],{"@type":451,"position":6,"name":452,"item":375},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":451,"position":41,"name":432,"item":454},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":451,"position":38,"name":425,"item":436}]