[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1575":420},{"entity":4,"seo":372},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":198,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":248,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":315,"serviceTags":316,"serviceCategories":317,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":348,"homeStats":349,"serviceProducts":362},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,136,141,146,153,158,162,167,172,176,181,189,193],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},918,"D某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨清瑶律师为其辩护，判处有期徒刑三年六个月，并处罚金126万元（缓刑未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平）​","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fc40c2125-1df9-4ed8-9d5b-92c48e48aba9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：侵犯公民个人信息罪 结果：判处三年六个月，并处126万元（未获采纳，但量刑低于同类案件平均水平） 亮点： 精准定性争议：成功驳斥方关于获利金额的指控（从218万元降至125万元），直接影响量刑基准。 ",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":128,"summary":129,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},917,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功争取取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2f3436fc-d30e-4b14-89ad-b7460107338c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名：诈骗罪 （资金盘） 结果： 吸粉引流类诈骗，30天成功争取 取保候审 亮点： 多次诉讼辅导、办案单位有效沟通；公安机关采纳律师意见； 焦点： 主观明知时间、程度；本案中的地位、作用； 案例综述： 先说以下涉案","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},916,"x某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国边境罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队为其辩护，获轻判","一、【案情简述】 2019年4月，当事人持护照由成都飞抵柬埔寨从事“炒群”工作，同年8月回国，在境外诈骗窝点累计三个月，获利23500元，期间被害人被诈骗68万余元。 二、【辩护思路】 晏律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往羁押地会见当事",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":139,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},915,"X 某某涉嫌诈骗罪、偷越国（边）境罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功打掉诈骗罪，刑期大幅降低","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F2e058be9-53ca-4220-9651-8ac5cfb55285.png","一、案件核心信息 · 罪名 ： 诈骗罪 、偷越国（边）境罪 · 辩护结果 ：律师成功打掉诈骗罪，仅以偷越国（边）境罪起诉，大幅降低刑期 · 案件亮点 ：精准打掉重罪指控；区分主观明知与被胁迫情形；在校大学生涉案从轻处理 · 封面语 ：X 某",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},914,"X 某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F004d7c52-4b16-4b8a-a67d-5394769a116f.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，X 某某成功 取保候审 案件亮点 ：在前期辩护未达预期后，律师介入实现取保候审突破；检察院认可从宽处理情节 封面语 ：X 某某轻信朋友出借银行卡并协助取现，涉",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},913,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金罪、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师和团队律律师为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002F86207993-8a55-4116-b332-acea52d593d4.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任S社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服务的Z综合服务中心和X综合服务中心两家民办非企业单位属于社区的资金19.2888万元占为已有并予以挥霍。2022","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":10,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":179,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ",{"id":182,"title":183,"thumbnail":184,"summary":185,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":186,"caseTypeName":187,"caseTypeCode":188},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":194,"title":195,"thumbnail":196,"summary":197,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",[199,202,207,210,215,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":152,"name":151,"summary":200,"keywords":201},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":203,"name":204,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":216,"name":217,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":186,"code":188,"name":187,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":243,"lawyer":247},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[244],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[249,252,271,284,297],{"id":234,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":250},[251],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":253,"createdAt":241,"updatedAt":241,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":254,"city":255,"caseType":256,"title":257,"thumbnail":258,"content":10,"publishTime":259,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":260,"lawyers":261},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[262,265,270],{"id":254,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":264,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":266,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":268,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":269,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":272,"createdAt":273,"updatedAt":273,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":274,"city":275,"caseType":276,"title":277,"thumbnail":278,"content":10,"publishTime":279,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":280,"lawyers":281},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[282],{"id":274,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":280,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":283,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":285,"createdAt":286,"updatedAt":286,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":287,"city":288,"caseType":289,"title":290,"thumbnail":291,"content":10,"publishTime":292,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":293,"lawyers":294},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[295],{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":293,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":296,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":298,"createdAt":299,"updatedAt":299,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":300,"city":301,"caseType":302,"title":303,"thumbnail":304,"content":10,"publishTime":305,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":306,"lawyers":307},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[308,311],{"id":300,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":312,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":313,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":314,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[318,323,328,333,338,343],{"id":43,"createdAt":319,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":34,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":327,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":34,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":332,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":334,"deleted":34,"code":335,"name":336,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":337,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":339,"updatedAt":340,"deleted":34,"code":341,"name":342,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":344,"updatedAt":345,"deleted":34,"code":346,"name":347,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[350,353,356,359],{"value":351,"label":352},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":354,"label":355},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":357,"label":358},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":360,"label":361},"6","全国分所",[363,366,369],{"title":364,"desc":365},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":367,"desc":368},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":370,"desc":371},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":373,"description":13,"keywords":374,"canonical":375,"image":10,"jsonLd":376},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[377],{"@context":378,"@graph":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[380,386],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"url":375,"name":7,"inLanguage":383,"publisher":384},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":387,"@id":385,"name":7,"url":375,"logo":388,"image":388,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":383,"address":389,"geo":392,"department":394},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":391},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":393,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[395,400,404,408,412,416],{"@type":396,"@id":397,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":401,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":405,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":409,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":413,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":385},{"@type":396,"@id":417,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":418,"parentOrganization":419},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":390,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":385},{"entity":421,"seo":433},{"id":422,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":424,"title":425,"thumbnail":426,"content":427,"publishTime":428,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":429},1575,"2026-11-13 22:57:17",11,"国企分管副总签过字 集体决策项目出事后该怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fa5cbf796-e89c-447b-a3d6-9c610f8fc3c4.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">项目是班子集体通过的，你又作为分管副总签过字，不能仅凭这两点判断有没有刑事责任。要把当时该管什么、知道什么、具体做了什么，以及行为与损失的关系分别查清。现在最有用的准备，是按项目环节整理真实材料，而非反复强调“大家都同意”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行监察规则要求追究负有责任的人员；公开释法案例和团队案件也提示，集体决定与个人责任必须分别核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签名是在确认参会、提出业务意见，还是批准付款？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">会上有无风险提示，你当时怎样回应，之后怎样执行？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">项目亏损中，哪些与本人的具体履职有关？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">收到谈话通知后，可以先核对通知、制作履职时间线，再就具体争点咨询律师。既不替集体包揽责任，也不遗漏自己的真实行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、项目出了问题，先把自己的那一段经过找出来\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">集体通过不当然免责，签过字也不等于独自承担全部责任。个人风险要落到具体职责、行为、认识和后果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“项目是班子会上通过的，我只是在审批单上签了字。现在审计说损失很大，纪委要找我谈，会不会都算到我头上？”对国企分管副总来说，最急的往往是弄清自己究竟需要说明什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先将三件事分开：项目是否亏损，决策或执行是否违规，本人是否达到应追究刑事责任的程度。经营亏损本身不能直接推出犯罪；但即使没有收钱，严重失责或滥用职权造成法定严重后果，仍可能涉及刑事风险。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签字要放回原文件理解。会议签到、会签意见、合同审批、付款授权，证明的事情不同。还要看签名前收到什么附件、签后是否附有条件、谁负责核验条件，以及本人后来实际做了什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">同样，不能把“没有决定权”直接理解成没有责任。分管副总即使不能最终拍板，也可能承担尽调、审查、报告或监督职责；这些职责须从当时有效的分工和实际履职中核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">表面情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">真正需要核实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">可对应的原有材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">会议集体通过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">谁提议 谁主导 讨论了什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">议题材料 会议记录 表决情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">审批单有签名\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">签批权限 意见范围 附带条件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">完整审批单 当时授权 OA流转\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">项目出现损失\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">损失怎样形成 与本人行为何关\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">履约记录 资金去向 审计附件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、公开规则与案例怎样区分集体决定中的个人责任\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">调查会关注集体决策，但不会到“集体同意”就结束。要继续查明哪些人员负有责任，以及各自承担责任的事实根据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）被追究的是负有责任的人员\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第四十七条规定，集体决定违法或集体实施违法行为，应依法追究负有责任的领导人员和直接责任人员中的公职人员的法律责任。这里的法律责任需要结合具体事实判断，不能把所有参会者一并视为有罪。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对国企经营管理中的失责、滥权问题，《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十八条是可能需要核对的条款。应结合企业性质、本人身份、职责、具体行为、主观过错及损失因果关系评估，不能因为职位中有“副总”二字就完成判断。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">国家机关人员的渎职案件另有相应规定。最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（一）》第五条要求，对于以集体研究形式实施的渎职犯罪，追究负有责任人员的责任，并综合考察具体执行人员的行为、反对意见和危害后果等。该条针对刑法第九章渎职犯罪，不能不区分主体就直接套用到每一件国企经营案件。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）张某担保案例关注的不是有没有会议纪要\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">中央纪委国家监委网站2025年4月2日刊载《以案明纪释法丨准确认定以集体研究为名滥用职权行为》。文中张某担任国有集团控股公司的总经理，明知对外担保受限，未经上级审批，在班子成员提出异议后仍主导作出担保决定，最终造成公司5000万元损失。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该文赞同认定张某构成国有公司人员滥用职权罪，理由涉及其实际职权、明知违规仍主导决策，以及违规行为与损失的联系。文章对其他成员则结合其反对意见、对是否向上级汇报的认识等，作出不同责任分析。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这是公开释法文章中的案例分析，并未披露法院判决及刑期，不能将其中意见写成生效裁判，更不能概括成“提过反对意见就一律免责”。它给分管副总的实际提示是：找出会上究竟讨论了什么、你的意见是什么、会后又发生了什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、团队案件提示，参与作用和争议金额要分别核实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">多人参与同一事项，也要分别审查行为性质、参与作用与金额；某项意见被提出，不等于最后被采纳。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的F某国企改制贪污案，涉及多年前国企破产改制中的资产转移。F某被指控伙同他人，将宿舍、食堂等价值1581万余元的国有资产转入其新设公司名下。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队围绕行为性质、资产评估及证据矛盾进行审查，提出不构成贪污罪的意见，并提出即便构罪也更符合私分国有资产罪等主张；同时就本人参与作用和从宽情节提出意见。最终法院仍认定贪污罪，判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年；案例说明记载取得从犯、坦白等情节认定。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这个结果不能表述为“成功改成私分国有资产罪”，也不能说资产评估中的全部争议均获法院支持。现有说明未提供逐笔金额认定和完整裁判理由，本文不作扩大解释。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该案属于资产转移指控，与普通经营亏损存在差别。它能支持的工作思路是：先把行为性质、本人作用、金额依据拆开核对。回到集体决策项目，不应只拿一份会议纪要说明所有问题，也不应把项目总投入直接当作本人的犯罪金额。旧案的缓刑结果不能用于预测当前项目的处理结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、谈话前最值得核对的四项事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把职责、信息、行为和损失对应到原有材料，才能说明哪些是本人真实履职，哪些仍需调查核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）审查要点一 签字时到底负有什么职责\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先找当时的任职文件、班子分工、公司章程和授权规定，再核对实际工作。立项建议、专业评审、上会表决、合同签批、拨款和后续监督，应分环节列明，不能用一句“我分管这个项目”包办所有内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果签字是附条件批准，要连同条件内容、落实人员和反馈材料一起保存。若形式上不分管却实际指挥，也应如实列出。岗位名称、书面授权和实际行为不一致的地方，正是需要解释的争点。有关判断应回到刑法第一百六十八条的具体职责与行为要求。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）审查要点二 当时知道什么 是否提出过异议\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把“当时已经知道”“当时收到但未核实”“事后才发现”的信息分开。是否收到虚假尽调、明显风险提示、利益关联说明，会影响对本人认识和履职情况的评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将议题附件、法务或财务意见、当时邮件与会议记录对照。如果确曾反对，说明反对的具体事项，以及后来是否改变意见、是否继续推动执行。不能只截取一句反对意见而省略后续同意；也不能把今天的风险认识倒写成当年的发言。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行监察证据规则要求结合材料与待证事实的关系综合判断。[2] 因此，“有异议”和“已经尽责”之间，还需要职责要求与后续行为支撑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）审查要点三 损失是在哪个环节形成的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将审计所列金额与投入、回款、剩余资产、债权和实际损失分开核对。某笔资金尚未回收、某项资产被计提减值，与刑法意义上损失是否成立、怎样计算，需要结合适用规则和证据判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">还要看方案获批后，是否有人改变合同条件、绕过付款条件，或在风险已经暴露后继续追加投入。市场变化、交易对方违约与本人失责可能同时存在，不能简单用其中一个因素解释全部后果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以整理损失形成时间线、合同变更和催收记录，提出具体核实线索；不能自行扣除所有尚有追偿可能的金额，也不能按参会人数平均分摊责任。刑法第一百六十八条要求的行为与严重后果联系，必须落实到证据。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）审查要点四 陈述是否准确表达自己的经过\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">谈话时分别说明亲自参与、从材料得知和听他人转述的事情。确实记不清的，说明记忆范围及可核对线索，不猜测别人的动机，也不因担心态度问题而认可自己没有做过的行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">笔录核对时，留意“参加讨论”是否被概括成“主导决定”，“同意按条件办理”是否丢了条件；若概括不准确，应如实提出具体更正。发现自己先前说错，也应说明错误内容、核对依据和更正原因。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十条对被强制到案、被管护、被留置人员的谈话、讯问笔录，明确了本人阅看签名要求。实施条例第六十七、六十八条要求全面收集并综合审查证据。准确核对有利和不利事实，都是这项准备的内容。[2][6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、已经收到谈话通知，现在可以怎样准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先核对通知和事实，再咨询具体争点。律师服务的范围取决于实际阶段，准备材料不等于能够阻止调查或留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）本人先完成一份履职与事实对照\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对联系机关、事由、时间地点及要求携带的材料，不仅凭“说明一下情况”判断自己的程序身份。按立项、评审、上会、签批、执行、监督顺序，写下本人职责、实际动作、当时信息和材料出处；无法确认的地方明确标注。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这份现在整理的说明，应注明整理日期和信息来源。它可以帮助核对经过，不能冒充当年的会议记录。只能依法整理自己有权持有的材料；原件在单位的，列明名称、保管部门和相关时间，供依法调取。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）家属可以协助咨询 不能代替查找单位秘密材料\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可保存已经合法收到的通知，整理本人已合法持有的任职信息及必要健康资料，协助说明目前最需要解决的问题。不要进入单位系统下载材料，也不要代为联系其他参会人统一陈述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果已经留置，可依法反映健康情况；需要申请变更措施时，应就具体事由准备材料。《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十条规定了本人及近亲属的申请权，但提出申请并不等于一定获准。[6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）会不会被留置 要另行核对法定条件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签过字、被要求谈话，都不等于必然留置；尚未定罪也不等于不会留置。依监察法第二十四条，须综合核对涉嫌严重职务违法或职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实证据、仍有重要问题待查，以及案情重大复杂、逃跑自杀风险、串供毁证风险或其他妨碍调查行为等法定情形，并依法审批。[6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">因此，不能通过联系同事“把话说一致”、补写异议或删除记录来应对。对确有失误的环节，应如实说明并依法纠正；对不准确的认定，则提出对应材料和核实线索。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）成都律师可以帮助核对什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在审计反馈、谈话准备或监察调查阶段，可以咨询具体风险，委托律师依法协助整理职责与事实、核对书面说明、评估程序事项。现行制度未赋予监察调查阶段一般性的辩护会见、阅卷权，不能把这一阶段服务承诺为“马上会见阅卷”。[7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">移送审查起诉后，辩护律师可依法阅卷，再对个人职责、知情情况、参与作用及损失依据作系统审查。[7][8] 初次咨询可以先带一份通知、完整签批材料的合法副本及履职时间线，由律师判断需要补充哪些资料；不必无差别提交全部私人信息。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安刑事风控委员会与本题相关的服务积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：成安律师团队累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件，覆盖国企管理等重点岗位。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师领衔，可围绕本题评估职责、决策材料及谈话准备，依法确定服务范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>主要依据与案例出处\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">依据核对至2026年11月13日。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1] 《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十八条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2] 《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》2025年修订，第四十七、六十七至七十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3] 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（一）》，法释〔2012〕18号，第五条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4] 中央纪委国家监委《以案明纪释法丨准确认定以集体研究为名滥用职权行为》，2025年4月2日；杨陵区纪委监委次日转载。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5] 获授权脱敏案例F某国企改制贪污案，未公开案号及完整裁判文书，依案例说明引用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6] 《中华人民共和国监察法》2024年修正，第二十四、五十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[7] 《中华人民共和国律师法》2026年修正，第三十一、三十六、三十七条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[8] 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》2018年修正，第三十四、四十条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方原文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成个案正式法律意见或结果承诺。案例已作必要脱敏，具体事实和处理结果以完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-13 22:57:02",{"id":424,"createdAt":430,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":34,"code":431,"name":432,"icon":35,"sort":186,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":434,"description":435,"keywords":35,"canonical":436,"image":426,"jsonLd":437},"国企分管副总签过字 集体决策项目出事后该怎么办？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 项目是班子集体通过的，你又作为分管副总签过字，不能仅凭这两点判断有没有刑事责任。要把当时该管什么、知道什么、具体做了什么，以及行为与损失的关系分别查清。现在最有用的准备，是按项目环节整理真实材料，而非反复强调“大家都同意”。 现行监察规则要求追究负有责任的人员；公开释法案例和团队案件也提示，集体","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1575",[438],{"@context":378,"@graph":439},[440,447],{"@type":441,"@id":436,"url":436,"headline":425,"description":435,"datePublished":442,"dateModified":443,"author":444,"publisher":445,"articleSection":432,"inLanguage":383,"image":446},"Article","2026-11-13T22:57:02+08:00","2026-11-13T22:57:17+08:00",{"@id":385},{"@id":385},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F13\u002Fa5cbf796-e89c-447b-a3d6-9c610f8fc3c4.jpg",{"@type":448,"itemListElement":449},"BreadcrumbList",[450,453,455],{"@type":451,"position":6,"name":452,"item":375},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":451,"position":41,"name":432,"item":454},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":451,"position":38,"name":425,"item":436}]