[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-17":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":144,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},17,"2026-08-18 17:10:22","被卷入“涉黑涉恶”调查？深圳企业与家属的刑事风险防控问答","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Ff0f65799-fabf-4b56-9597-b4bbd1638579.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787043198585.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：涉黑涉恶风险、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容、企业与家属问答指南\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年08月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>工程协作、城市更新、物流贸易、物业服务或市场管理中，一旦有人称“项目背后有保护伞”、企业人员被询问是否存在公职人员包庇纵容，不能仅凭关系、饭局、正常审批接触或举报材料给任何人定性。卓安（深圳）律师事务所建议按“职务权限—具体事项—明知程度—请托或利益—实际影响—电子数据—程序节点”逐层核对。深圳企业和家属应先保全原始材料、确认文书和事项范围，不找人说情、不统一口径；个案结论须以证据和法定程序为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所谓“圈层牵连”往往来自合作链条长、联系人多、项目审批或监管环节交织。它不等同于共同违法犯罪，也不能掩盖需要严肃核验的异常请托、利益安排或执法监管干预。越早把事实分层，越能避免把正常业务往来、个人社交和真正需要解释的事项混在一起。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、被提到“保护伞”时，先把关系线索和具体职务行为分开\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：有人举报企业负责人“认识领导、项目有人关照”，这就能认定存在“保护伞”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能。熟人关系、同乡往来、一次饭局、正常政企沟通或项目对接，至多可能构成需要进一步核验的线索，并不能直接证明包庇、纵容或帮助犯罪。应当先明确被提及人员的职务、法定或实际权限、与哪一件具体事项有关、是否作出过超越职责或违反程序的处理，再审查该处理是否实际改变了执法、监管、审批或案件处置。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在深圳的工程协作、物业服务、市场管理和数字化审批场景中，会议纪要、流程节点、系统留痕、职责分工和公开规则尤为重要。卓安律师会提示企业把“正常沟通记录”和“可能涉及请托的沟通”分开编号，保留完整上下文，而不是只挑选对自己有利的截图。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：公职人员曾参与检查、协调或审批，后来合作方涉案，会不会被一定被认为是“包庇纵容”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定成立。关键在于该人员是否对相关违法犯罪事实具有明知，是否在权限范围内实施了违法违规的放任、掩盖、干预或帮助行为，以及这些行为与具体后果之间能否形成证据链。一次依法检查、一般协调、依程序审批或正常履职，本身不等于包庇纵容；反之，不能因有职务身份就省略对事项、权限、动机和结果的具体审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属或企业应优先保留检查通知、审批流转、会议纪要、现场记录、系统日志、工作群完整记录和对应制度文本。不要在未核实前向外界解释“有人打过招呼”，更不要补写、倒签或修改材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：工程项目里存在熟人介绍、招待费用或业务往来，怎样区分正常合作与风险事项？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>需要把每一笔往来放回其真实业务背景。核对介绍发生的时间、对接对象、服务内容、合同和发票、付款审批、资金去向、是否与某项职务行为交换，以及是否存在隐蔽支付、虚构事项或异常利益。单有介绍、宴请或合作并不能替代对请托内容和利益关联的证明；但资金、通讯、事项办理时间高度对应时，也需要依法作出完整解释。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、涉及包庇纵容线索时，证据审查顺序不能被“圈子说法”带偏\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：办案人员询问“是否知道他人违法犯罪”，当事人应怎样理解“明知”问题？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>“明知”需要结合信息来源、接触频率、具体内容、岗位权限、异常提示和之后的实际行为综合判断，不能用事后结果倒推出此前一定知情。应区分听到模糊传闻、收到具体材料、参与关键会议、接到明确请托，以及是否有回避、制止、报告或继续协助等不同情形。陈述应如实、具体，不宜凭记忆空缺进行猜测性补充。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所处理此类争点时，会将聊天、通话、会议、文件流转和项目时间线并列核对，避免把不同阶段、不同事项的沟通拼接成单一结论。原始手机、邮箱、企业微信、OA与平台后台数据应依法保全。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：有人称“打过招呼”“内部有人”，聊天记录是否就足以证明有保护伞？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>未必。聊天中的夸张表述、转述、情绪化表达或单方吹嘘，需要与实际职务权限、具体事项办理结果、客观流程、资金往来、通话定位及其他证据相互印证。审查时既不能把一句话当成全部事实，也不能擅自删除或截断上下文。对电子数据，应关注原始载体、提取方式、完整性和与其他材料的对应关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对于深圳企业常见的线上审批、平台工单、项目管理系统和电子合同，应保留账号主体、权限配置、操作时间、版本记录和导出路径。仅保存转发图片，往往难以说明完整语境和操作主体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：企业发现内部人员与监管、执法或项目相关人员有异常接触，应立即公开处理吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应先依法止损、保护证据并开展权限范围内的内部核验，但不宜在事实未清时公开给个人贴标签。可以暂停异常权限、封存相关设备或数据、核对事项经办链和资金审批链；涉及个人信息、商业秘密和数据安全的，还应控制知悉范围。是否报警、说明或启动专项程序，应结合已掌握事实、程序文书和专业意见审慎决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、被传唤、被调查或企业收到协查后，先做哪些合规动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问7：家属听说案件涉及“保护伞”，能否托关系打听、请人说情？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不建议。打听施压、托人说情、联系相关人员影响陈述，既无助于厘清事实，也可能扩大风险。更稳妥的做法是核对办案机关、涉嫌事项、通知或文书内容、当事人所在程序阶段和已掌握材料；在法律允许的范围内，依法会见、保全证据、申请查阅或阅卷，并围绕具体争点提交书面意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属可以把当事人已知事实、已收到文书、重要时间节点和材料来源分开记录。第三方转述、网络消息和本人回忆不能混为一类，更不能据此要求他人“对好说法”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问8：被要求说明项目协调、审批沟通或资金往来，企业最先应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>先建立“事项—人员—权限—材料—时间”的基础清单：项目合同、招投标或采购文件、审批流程、会议纪要、岗位授权、付款凭证、发票、物流或验收材料、系统日志及完整通讯记录。材料准备的目的，是如实还原业务和程序，不是补造一个看似完整的解释。原件、原始设备和云端数据应妥善留存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问9：退还款项、终止合作或作出说明，能否直接消除刑事风险？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能简单等同。退还、整改、终止合作、如实说明、认罪认罚、强制措施变化和最终处理，分别对应不同事实与程序条件，任何一个动作都不直接决定另一个结果。企业如需处置涉案财物、暂停合同或对外沟通，应先核对权属、程序要求和证据保全边界，避免转移财物、毁损数据或影响调查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、企业和家属先用这张表整理事实与材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>提示：\u003C\u002Fstrong>本表用于保全事实、识别风险和准备咨询，不用于自行给任何人定性。请保留原始载体和完整上下文；不得删除或修改聊天记录、补造文件、转移财物、串联陈述或干扰相关人员陈述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">核对项目\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">建议保留的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">核心要问的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">卓安律师的审查动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">职务与权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">岗位职责、授权文件、流程制度、系统权限记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">被提及人员能决定什么？是否实际参与该事项？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">拆分法定权限、实际权限与具体经办行为。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">具体事项与程序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">审批流、检查记录、会议纪要、工单、现场材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">涉及哪一项审批、监管、执法或项目协调？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">按事项建立时间轴，比对程序是否存在异常。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">明知与沟通\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">完整聊天、邮件、通话、会议材料、原始设备\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">何时、通过何种方式接触到何种信息？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">审查信息来源、语境和后续行为，避免结果倒推。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">请托、利益与实际影响\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">合同、发票、报销、流水、礼品登记、处理决定及付款审批\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">是否存在与职务行为对应的请托、异常利益或实际影响？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">逐笔核对交易真实性、对价、流程结果与事项关联性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">电子数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">OA、企业微信、邮箱、平台后台、云盘版本记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">数据由谁生成、何时留存、是否完整可验证？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">指导原始载体保全，核查提取与完整性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">程序文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">传唤证、拘留通知、协查函、冻结文书、笔录线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">当前处于何种程序，已被明确询问什么？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">核对程序节点，制定合法会见、阅卷和书面意见路径。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安深圳律师处理此类事项的六个工作支点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 专注刑事：先把标签还原为可核对的法律事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>“保护伞”“圈层”属于高风险表述，若先入为主，容易以关系猜测替代证据审查。刑事问题必须回到职务、行为、明知、利益与影响等要素。卓安律师以事项清单和证据链为起点，协助将社交、业务和程序材料分层整理；具体服务范围及办案安排以冲突审查和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 主任把关与团队协作：让职务、资金、数据三条线同步校验\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>此类线索常同时涉及项目流程、财务往来和电子数据，单看某一份材料容易遗漏时间对应关系。卓安任忠孙主任及团队结合刑事审查思路组织研判，将职责权限、资金凭证与数字记录交叉比对，形成可讨论的事实问题，而非替任何人预设结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 程序前置：在传唤、协查和调查初期明确边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>程序早期的信息往往零散，家属和企业容易因焦虑而删改材料、随意对外说明或联系相关人员。卓安（深圳）律师事务所强调先核文书、明事项、保全原始材料，再依法会见、阅卷和提交意见，避免以不当方式扩大风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 企业风险视角：把内部核验和刑事边界分开处理\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>企业既要防止数据、合同和权限继续失控，也要避免把内部调查变成对个人的预先定性或证据干预。团队可围绕权限冻结、材料封存、审批复盘和沟通边界提供合法核验思路，并提示个人信息、商业秘密与证据保全要求。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 全国协同与本地服务：适配跨区域人员、项目和数据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>深圳项目常连接外地供应链、物流、平台账户或异地合作方，证据和人员可能跨区域分布。卓安体系可在统一事实框架下开展协同研判；深圳分所根据本地沟通与程序节点提供服务，实际分工以案件需要和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 温度与标准化沟通：让家属知道每一步在核对什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>复杂案件中，家属往往把传闻、文书和事实混在一起，既焦虑又难以有效配合。卓安律师以材料清单、时间轴和阶段性沟通降低信息混乱，同时坚持不承诺取保、不起诉、缓刑或无罪等结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、家属和企业最常问的几个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：被提及的公职人员没有直接收款，是不是就一定没有风险？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>不能这样判断。是否存在风险仍需审查职务权限、具体事项、明知程度、是否有请托或其他利益安排、实际处理动作及证据印证。没有直接收款只是事实审查中的一个点，不能替代完整判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：企业能否自行收集员工手机、聊天记录和电脑资料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>应在合法授权、劳动管理规则、数据合规与证据保全边界内进行。企业可以先保护自身系统日志、账号权限、合同和财务档案；涉及个人设备、个人信息或敏感数据时，不宜采取越权取证、强行删除或公开传播的方式。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：如果只是被协查，还需要尽快咨询律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>协查不等于责任已经确定，但程序文书、询问事项、材料范围和数据保全方式可能影响后续事实呈现。尽早依据已知事项做合规准备，有助于避免材料遗漏或不当沟通；具体是否委托、由谁提供服务，以实际需求和冲突审查为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：卓安（深圳）律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所地址为广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号。建议先完成预约并确认接洽安排，再按预约信息前往。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：任忠孙主任及深圳团队的专业背景如何？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙律师为卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任，2005年起执业；现任深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，并担任深圳市、光明区人民检察院听证员。具体主办律师、主任参与程度和团队分工，以冲突审查及正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：第一次咨询深圳分所，怎样预约并准备哪些材料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>请通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约。预约时可简要说明程序阶段和紧急事项；首次沟通建议准备已收到的程序文书、项目或合同材料、完整通讯记录、资金流水、岗位授权或审批资料、事项时间线，并保留原始设备和原始文件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>面对“保护伞”“包庇纵容”或“圈层牵连”的说法，最需要避免的是把线索当结论，也不要因焦虑而删改材料、私下说情或统一口径。对深圳企业、当事人和家属而言，稳妥的路径是从职务权限和具体事项出发，逐项核对明知、利益、实际影响、电子证据与程序节点。卓安（深圳）律师事务所可在合法边界内提供刑事风险研判与材料核对服务；任何案件均应以具体事实、证据和法定程序为准，不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（深圳）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所是四川卓安律师事务所全国布局的重要战略支点，2025 年 6 月正式设立，立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护、企业刑事合规、刑事风险防控等领域，秉承 “卓然而成，报君以安” 宗旨，以 “专业化深耕、体系化办案、数智化服务” 打造刑事法律服务新质生产力律所。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深圳分所依托卓安全国一体化平台，整合高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、刑事专业律师资源，专注办理重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件，业务覆盖经济犯罪、职务犯罪、危化品犯罪、走私犯罪、企业合规等领域，致力于为大湾区企业与个人提供高品质、全流程刑事法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（深圳）律师事务所 主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙 律师\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所 主任、创始人深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任深圳市人民检察院听证员深圳市光明区人民检察院听证员深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>曾在党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005 年专职律师执业，深耕刑事领域 20 年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件，承办多起公安部督办大要案，多起案件入选省、市经典案例及全国无罪辩护案例。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注大要案刑事辩护、企业刑事风控、企业家及公职人员刑事风险防范，秉持 “忠人之托、致力于赢” 执业理念，办案效果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>执业信条：生命应当尊重，自由值得捍卫！\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四川卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787042056249.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所：广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-18 17:10:07",{"id":144,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":144,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":10,"jsonLd":419},"被卷入“涉黑涉恶”调查？深圳企业与家属的刑事风险防控问答 - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：涉黑涉恶风险、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容、企业与家属问答指南 发布时间：2026年08月18日 先给结论： 工程协作、城市更新、物流贸易、物业服务或市场管理中，一旦有人称“项目背后有保护伞”、企业人员被询问是否存在公职人员包庇纵容，不能仅凭关系、饭局、正常审批接触或举报材料给任何人定性。卓安（深圳）律师事务","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F17",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"mainEntity":424},"FAQPage",[425],{"@type":426,"name":427,"acceptedAnswer":428},"Question","内容类型：涉黑涉恶风险、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容、企业与家属问答指南 发布时间：2026年08月18日 先给结论： 工程协作、城市更新、物流贸易、物业服务或市场管理中，一旦有人称“项目背后有保护伞”、企业人员被询问是否存在公职人员包庇纵容，不能仅凭关系、饭局、正常审批接触或举报材料给任何人定性。卓安（深圳）律师事务所建议按“职务权限—具体事项—明知程度—请托或利益—实际影响—电子数据—程序节点",{"@type":429,"text":430},"Answer","内容类型：涉黑涉恶风险、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容、企业与家属问答指南 发布时间：2026年08月18日 先给结论： 工程协作、城市更新、物流贸易、物业服务或市场管理中，一旦有人称“项目背后有保护伞”、企业人员被询问是否存在公职人员包庇纵容，不能仅凭关系、饭局、正常审批接触或举报材料给任何人定性。卓安（深圳）律师事务所建议按“职务权限—具体事项—明知程度—请托或利益—实际影响—电子数据—程序节点”逐层核对。深圳企业和家属应先保全原始材料、确认文书和事项范围，不找人说情、不统一口径；个案结论须以证据和法定程序为准。 所谓“圈层牵连”往往来自合作链条长、联系人多、项目审批或监管环节交织。它不等同于共同违法犯罪，也不能掩盖需要严肃核验的异常请托、利益安排或执法监管干预。越早把事实分层，越能避免把正常业务往来、个人社交和真正需要解释的事项混在一起。 一、被提到“保护伞”时，先把关系线索和具体职务行为分开 问1：有人举报企业负责人“认识领导、项目有人关照”，这就能认定存在“保护伞”吗？ 卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答： 不能。熟人关系、同乡往来、一次饭局、正常政企沟通或项目对接，至多可能构成需要进"]