[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-41":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":144,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},41,"2026-08-19 17:07:59","认识公职人员、参加饭局就算 “保护伞” 吗？四川达州涉黑涉恶风险 12 问","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F19\u002F27c5c4a1-9691-4866-8b3b-ef51b371448b.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787126134397.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶、刑事风险问答\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年08月19日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>工程劳务结算、商贸供货、项目协调、物流运输和公共事务接触中，认识工作人员、参加饭局、同在群聊、提出举报或走正常审批流程，都不能直接证明存在“黑恶保护伞”或包庇纵容。卓安（达州）律师事务所提示，判断圈层牵连必须逐层核对职务权限、具体事项及处理动作、是否明知、是否存在请托或利益、是否实际影响事项办理、电子数据能否印证以及案件所处程序节点。家属和企业应保留原始材料、分开梳理人员角色，不删改、不串联、不找不正当关系；个案结论仍以完整证据和法定程序为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先分清“接触线索”与“包庇纵容”：家属最容易误判的三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：家人和公职人员认识、同乡或在一个群里，是否就会被认定为“保护伞”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不会。社会关系、工作群、同学同乡或共同出席活动，只能说明存在接触可能，不能替代职务权限、具体请托、实际处理动作和主观明知的证明。需要分别查清：对方是否对涉案事项有法定或实际处置权限；本人是否提出过具体请求；是否有指令、批示、通风报信、违法干预或其他可验证动作；这些动作是否与案件利益发生连接。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在达州的项目协调、货运通行、供货对接等场景里，联系人多并不稀奇。卓安律师会先把“认识谁”拆回“在何时、因何事、通过何种方式联系、谁能决定什么”四项事实，避免把圈层标签替代个人行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：企业因工程协调、物流检查或行政流程与工作人员沟通，正常请示会不会被误解为请托？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>正常的咨询、递交材料、申请审批、反映问题或参加公开协调，并不直接等于请托。关键在于沟通是否围绕合法、公开的事项，是否要求对方违反职责或绕开程序，是否伴随隐蔽利益安排，以及最终是否产生异常处理结果。应保留合同、报送材料、会议通知、公开函件、审批流转记录和完整沟通上下文。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>不要为了“解释清楚”而补写说明、删除不利聊天或让他人代为联系。原始材料中的时间、对象、附件和流程节点，往往比事后概括更能区分正常事务往来与可能被质疑的异常干预。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：被举报“有人包庇”后，是不是就意味着当事人已经涉嫌犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不是。举报、反映、网络说法或调查线索需要进一步核实，不能直接代替事实认定。即便办案机关开展核查，也仍应回到具体事项、处理权限、行为证据、主观认识和程序文书。对被提及的个人而言，最重要的是确认自己被了解的是哪一件事、哪一段时间、哪一种行为，而不是先接受笼统标签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所会建议家属把已知内容分为“文书载明”“本人亲历”“他人转述”“尚待核实”四栏，避免把猜测混入材料目录，影响后续事实研判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、从公共事务接触到刑事风险：按七个节点核对，而不是凭关系判断\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：所谓“包庇纵容”通常要先查哪些事实？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应按“职务权限—具体事项或处理动作—明知—请托或利益—实际影响—电子数据—程序节点”依次审查。首先看相关人员是否具有能影响该事项的职责或实际控制力；再看是否存在具体的违法处置、泄露信息、违规放任或干预行为；随后才审查是否明知涉案组织或违法事实、是否接受请托或利益、是否确实影响了处理结果。任何一个关键环节缺乏证据，都不能用关系标签直接补足。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>例如工程款结算、货运路线、市场秩序或项目验收发生争议时，正常的职能分工、公开协调与不当干预之间，必须用原始流程、权限链和具体动作区分。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：没有收钱、没有转账，是不是就一定不存在风险？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能只用“有没有转账”作判断。利益可能被主张为财物、消费安排、债务减免、岗位便利、经营机会或其他不正当利益；但这类主张同样需要与具体请托、职务行为、时间节点和客观资料相互印证。反过来，一笔正常借款、业务款、餐费或共同消费，也不能脱离合同、账目和真实背景被直接定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉及资金时，应保留完整账户流水、合同、发票、对账、借款凭证、还款记录、报销制度和资金审批链。不要自行删改交易备注、拆分转账或借用他人账户“处理”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：饭局、礼品、节日往来会不会直接被说成利益输送？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>单次社交或礼尚往来不自动等于利益输送，仍要看双方身份、场合、价值、频率、是否与特定事项紧密衔接、是否存在请托以及是否影响职务行为。对企业和个人而言，最稳妥的是保留真实的消费、报销、邀请、会议和业务背景资料，而不是事后统一编造“普通朋友”解释。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任具有13年公安机关刑事侦查一线工作经历，现任达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任。面对关系与资金交织的材料，卓安律师会将身份、事项、资金、通讯和程序时间轴分别建表，再审查它们能否真正相互印证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、被询问、传唤或企业被调取资料后：先做哪些合法动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问7：收到询问、传唤通知，家属和企业第一步该做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>先核验文书名称、办案单位、时间、地点、涉及事项和联系人，并保存原件或清晰照片。到案、说明和提交材料应依法进行；如需法律帮助，应尽早咨询刑事律师，围绕已知事实和程序节点准备。不要因恐慌拒绝、躲避、让人代替到场，也不要通过同事、关联方或所谓“熟人”打听、施压或干预。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>企业可指定一名合规联络人管理文书和资料交接，建立“收到时间—交接对象—材料名称—原始载体位置”的登记表，同时保持经营资料原状。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问8：调查人员调取手机、电脑、项目资料，能不能先清理私人内容或工作群？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能。电子数据的使用人、保管人、生成时间、完整上下文和提取程序都可能成为审查重点。删除聊天、退出群聊、重置设备、远程清除云端内容或让他人代持设备，可能带来更大风险。可以在不改变数据的前提下登记设备型号、账号归属、实际使用人、工作权限和保存位置，并及时向律师说明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>工程资料、运输订单、供货对账、项目沟通记录常由多人接触。卓安律师会协助区分公司系统数据、个人设备数据、授权范围和实际操作痕迹，避免把“设备在谁手里”简单等同于“内容由谁控制或明知”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问9：同事、合作方来问案情，能不能约好一起说明？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能协调事实口径。不同人员对同一项目、账款、群聊或公共事务接触的角色可能不同，甚至存在利益冲突。可以提醒彼此保留原始材料、依法应对和各自咨询律师，但不能删除记录、补做合同、传递证言内容、约定谁来承担责任或请人影响陈述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属也应避免在群聊转发未经核实的案件信息。对外说明应限于必要、真实且不妨碍程序的范围，具体边界由律师结合案件阶段判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、实用行动：家属与企业可按这份顺序整理材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问10：第一次咨询时，哪些材料最有价值？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>优先带程序文书、当事人基本信息、岗位或职务资料、项目和合同资料、资金与报销凭证、完整沟通记录、设备账号清单、已知人员关系以及按日期整理的真实时间线。材料不齐也可以先咨询，但务必区分亲历事实、他人转述和不确定内容。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对于工程劳务、商贸供货、物流运输等业务，建议将合同签订、履行、对账、付款、协调事项、投诉举报和行政流程分别归档，避免将多个事项混在一份“情况说明”里。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问11：企业负责人被牵连时，能否同时代表公司和个人处理？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定。公司利益、负责人个人责任、员工陈述、供应商账款和项目资料之间可能并不一致。共同咨询可以帮助了解框架，但是否共同委托、由谁代表谁、哪些材料可以共享，应先进行利益冲突审查。尤其在账户控制、指令来源、具体获利和电子设备使用问题上，不能用“公司安排”笼统替代个人事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所会在接洽阶段说明委托主体、服务范围、材料保密边界和可能的冲突风险；实际分工以利益冲突审查和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问12：家属担心“圈层牵连”，最不能做的事情是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>最不能做的是删改数据、补签倒签、编造说明、转移财物、联系相关人员统一说法、要求他人撤回或改变陈述，以及通过不正当方式找关系“摆平”。这些行为既可能损害原有事实解释，也可能带来新的程序和证据风险。正确做法是保留原始状态、记录来源和时间、依法咨询并由律师协助判断材料的提交与说明方式。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑事案件中，补偿、和解、如实陈述、认罪认罚、取保候审、羁押必要性审查与最终处理具有不同法律条件，任何一项都不能被当成对另一项结果的保证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、材料与风险核对表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核对项目\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">建议保留的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核心要问的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">卓安律师的审查动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">职务与权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">岗位职责、授权文件、流程图、会议纪要\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">谁对该事项有法定或实际处置权？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">梳理权限链，区分职务名称与实际决定权。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">具体事项与动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">申请材料、审批流、函件、项目台账、现场记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">被指向的是哪件事、哪一步、谁作了什么？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">还原事项路径，核对是否存在可验证的异常动作。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">沟通与明知\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">完整聊天、通话记录、邮件、群公告、联系人备注\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">何时知悉何种事实？是否有完整上下文？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">比对时间轴与语境，审查推定“明知”的证据基础。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">请托与利益\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">合同、流水、发票、借款及还款、报销材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">是否存在具体请托及对应的不正当利益？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">分离正常业务、个人往来与待核实资金事项。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">实际影响\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">处理决定、办结文书、流程留痕、投诉处理材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">沟通后是否真的改变了法定处理结果？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核查因果链，避免以接触替代实际影响。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">电子数据与设备\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">手机、电脑、账号清单、权限记录、系统日志\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">谁使用、谁控制、数据是否完整、如何提取？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">登记原始载体，审查数据关联性与程序要点。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">程序节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">传唤\u002F拘留等文书、扣押清单、询问笔录线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">案件处于核查、侦查、审查起诉还是审判？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">依据节点安排会见、阅卷、意见提交和风险沟通。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>材料应保留原始载体、完整上下文和来源说明。不要删除数据、伪造记录、补签倒签、统一陈述或对相关人员施加影响；表格用于协助整理，不用于自行认定责任或规避调查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安律师处理此类风险的四个优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 刑事视角拆解“关系标签”，先把个人事实落到证据上\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>“保护伞”“圈层牵连”等表述容易把复杂人际关系压缩成结论，而刑事审查不能跳过个人行为、主观认识和证据对应。仅凭认识、同群或工作接触，难以替代对职务权限、具体动作和实际影响的逐项证明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所坚持以刑事责任边界为起点，将人物关系图、事项时间线、资金流和通讯记录分开比对。该方法用于形成可核验的事实问题清单，不预设任何程序或实体结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 张罗主任的侦查一线经验，服务于程序与事实的双向核验\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>在涉及公共事务接触、多人项目和电子数据的案件中，程序文书、询问重点、数据提取和人员角色常互相交叉。只看一份说明或一段聊天，可能忽略证据形成方式和待补强环节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任具有13年公安机关刑事侦查一线工作经历，并担任达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任。卓安律师据此更重视把已知程序节点、材料来源和个人事实逐项核对；主任参与、主办安排及服务范围仍以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 企业事项与个人责任分层，避免一份材料混淆多重立场\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>工程、供货、运输和项目协调中，公司决策、岗位执行、外部合作和个人通讯可能同时出现。企业账目或项目结果并不能自动推导个人明知、控制或获利，反之亦然。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师会协助按合同履行、权限授权、资金审批、设备使用和对外沟通建立分层目录，提示企业与个人分别评估立场、保密和冲突问题。材料整理必须尊重真实性与合法程序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 以流程化沟通降低家属焦虑，守住不当干预边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>家属在被询问、传唤或资料调取后最容易急于“找关系”或协调说法，却可能造成额外风险。专业服务不仅是分析事实，也要把能做与不能做、谁保管材料、何时反馈讲清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所可在利益冲突审查后，围绕程序核验、材料目录、会见阅卷条件和阶段性意见开展工作，并以明确联络和材料交接降低信息混乱。任何案件处理均受事实、证据和法定程序约束。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、家属和企业还会问的六个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 只是被电话了解情况，需要马上请律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>是否立即委托应结合被了解事项、是否收到文书、是否涉及设备或多人项目、是否可能影响个人或企业立场判断。可以先通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约咨询，携带已知文书和真实材料目录；不要根据传言自行删除、解释或联系相关人员。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 达州分所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所地址为四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼。到访前请通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约并确认接洽安排，避免因案件冲突审查、会见或外出工作造成沟通不便。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 能简单介绍一下张罗主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>张罗律师为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，具有13年公安机关刑事侦查一线工作经历，担任达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任。具体由谁主办、主任参与程度、服务范围和费用，应在利益冲突审查后以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 第一次怎么预约，需要带什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>请通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约。首次可准备：传唤、拘留、调取或其他程序文书；当事人身份与岗位资料；合同、项目、审批、账目和流水材料；手机电脑账号与使用清单；完整聊天、邮件或群沟通的原始载体说明；按日期整理的事实时间线。材料不齐时，也应如实说明缺口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 企业能不能先做内部核查？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>可以在不干扰调查、不删改原始数据、不诱导员工陈述的前提下，依法保全合同、流程、权限、账目和设备使用资料。内部核查应明确合法边界，必要时由律师协助区分企业合规整理与刑事辩护中的个人立场。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 收到“有人举报”的消息后，能不能找举报人沟通？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>不宜自行联系要求撤回、解释或改变说法，尤其不能施压、许诺利益或通过第三人传话。应先核验是否存在正式程序、举报涉及何种具体事项，并由律师根据证据和节点提出合法处理建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、风险提醒\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>普通工作往来、认识工作人员、饭局、同群、举报或正常流程，都不是“保护伞”或包庇纵容的当然证明；但任何具体请托、利益安排、异常处理动作、电子数据和实际影响，也不能因为存在正常业务背景而被忽略。面对核查或刑事程序，应坚持原始保存、如实说明、依法沟通，避免通过关系、删改材料或协调口径制造新的风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>圈层关系不等于刑事责任，公共事务接触也不等于包庇纵容。真正需要审查的是：谁有权限、办了什么事、是否明知、是否有请托或利益、是否造成实际影响，以及证据能否完整对应。把这些问题按时间、人员、事项和材料逐一讲清楚，既是家属和企业降低误判的起点，也是依法应对程序风险的基础。卓安（达州）律师事务所可在合法边界内提供刑事风险研判与材料核对服务；任何案件均应以具体事实、证据和法定程序为准，不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>免责声明：\u003C\u002Fstrong>本文为一般刑事法律信息，不构成正式法律意见，也不对取保候审、不起诉、无罪、缓刑或其他结果作出承诺。案件服务安排以利益冲突审查、正式委托、实际分工、事实证据和法定程序为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四川卓安（达州）律师事务所，位于四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，团队由分所主任张罗主任带领，高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成。代理刑事案件150+并多次为当事人成功减刑、缓刑、取保候审等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所 主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>中共党员\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十二年公安系统工作经验\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>经历：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>个人荣誉：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”、“优秀公务员”、“优秀党员”及“破案能手”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>优秀案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在D某涉嫌引诱、容留他人吸毒案中，通过质疑引诱行为与吸毒欲望的关联，成功争取检察院做出存疑不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌袭警案中，二审期间介入辩护，成功帮助一审已被判实刑六个月的当事人获得绝对不起诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌金额四千多万的合同诈骗案中，通过证明融资租赁形式属民事范畴且无非法占有目的，促使公安机关撤案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在Z某某涉嫌逃税案中，通过论证当事人并非实际纳税主体（挂靠公司才是），成功促使公安机关做出撤案决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四川卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787125771886.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-19 17:07:25",{"id":144,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":144,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":10,"jsonLd":419},"认识公职人员、参加饭局就算 “保护伞” 吗？四川达州涉黑涉恶风险 12 问 - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶、刑事风险问答 发布时间：2026年08月19日 先给结论： 工程劳务结算、商贸供货、项目协调、物流运输和公共事务接触中，认识工作人员、参加饭局、同在群聊、提出举报或走正常审批流程，都不能直接证明存在“黑恶保护伞”或包庇纵容。卓安（达州）律师事务所提示，判断圈层牵连必须逐层核对职务权限、具体事项及","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F41",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"mainEntity":424},"FAQPage",[425],{"@type":426,"name":427,"acceptedAnswer":428},"Question","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶、刑事风险问答 发布时间：2026年08月19日 先给结论： 工程劳务结算、商贸供货、项目协调、物流运输和公共事务接触中，认识工作人员、参加饭局、同在群聊、提出举报或走正常审批流程，都不能直接证明存在“黑恶保护伞”或包庇纵容。卓安（达州）律师事务所提示，判断圈层牵连必须逐层核对职务权限、具体事项及处理动作、是否明知、是否存在请托或利益、是否实际影响事项办理、电子数据能否印证以",{"@type":429,"text":430},"Answer","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶、刑事风险问答 发布时间：2026年08月19日 先给结论： 工程劳务结算、商贸供货、项目协调、物流运输和公共事务接触中，认识工作人员、参加饭局、同在群聊、提出举报或走正常审批流程，都不能直接证明存在“黑恶保护伞”或包庇纵容。卓安（达州）律师事务所提示，判断圈层牵连必须逐层核对职务权限、具体事项及处理动作、是否明知、是否存在请托或利益、是否实际影响事项办理、电子数据能否印证以及案件所处程序节点。家属和企业应保留原始材料、分开梳理人员角色，不删改、不串联、不找不正当关系；个案结论仍以完整证据和法定程序为准。 一、先分清“接触线索”与“包庇纵容”：家属最容易误判的三件事 问1：家人和公职人员认识、同乡或在一个群里，是否就会被认定为“保护伞”？ 卓安（达州）律师事务所解答： 不会。社会关系、工作群、同学同乡或共同出席活动，只能说明存在接触可能，不能替代职务权限、具体请托、实际处理动作和主观明知的证明。需要分别查清：对方是否对涉案事项有法定或实际处置权限；本人是否提出过具体请求；是否有指令、批示、通风报信、违法干预或其他可验证动作；这些动作是否与案件利益发生连接。 在达州"]