[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-8":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":414},{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":405,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":144,"title":406,"thumbnail":407,"content":408,"publishTime":409,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":410},"2026-08-17 16:58:19","【卓安解答】公职人员被指“黑恶保护伞”，家属如何判断风险边界？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F17\u002F61b1d7a3-59c8-45b4-8f7e-ff6f818f86a8.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1786952685348.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：深圳涉黑涉恶、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容问答\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年08月17日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>被调查、被举报与“黑恶保护伞”已经成立不是一回事。涉及公职人员包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织或者恶势力相关线索时，不能只看认识关系、饭局往来或项目协调，应依次核对职务权限、是否存在具体违规行为、是否明知相关违法犯罪、是否收受或承诺利益、是否实际影响案件处置或监管执法，以及证据能否相互印证。深圳企业经营、城市更新、工程协作、物流贸易和娱乐场所管理场景中，电子数据、审批材料与资金流水往往同样重要。卓安（深圳）律师事务所建议先保留原始材料、核对程序文书，再依法会见、阅卷和提交意见；任何个案结论均以证据与法定程序为准，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>下面的问题，集中回应家属、企业管理者在深圳遇到“有人说存在保护伞”“公职人员被问及是否包庇纵容”时最容易混淆的边界。先把事实、权限、时间线和原始载体分开整理，通常比凭传言判断更有助于依法应对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、被提到“关系”“打招呼”，是否就会被认定为黑恶保护伞？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：公职人员与涉案经营者认识、吃过饭或有工作联系，会不会直接被认定为“保护伞”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不会。正常认识、依法接访、日常业务对接或一般社会交往，本身不能直接证明包庇纵容。关键要查的是：相关人员在何时、基于何种职务权限，是否针对具体事项实施了违反职责要求的行为；其行为是否与特定违法犯罪活动、监管失守或案件处置之间具有可核对的关联。仅把关系图谱当作结论，容易忽略每一次接触的内容、权限边界和客观后果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：有人反映“帮忙说情”“要求关照”，家属应先弄清哪些事实？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应先区分反映的是哪一次具体事项：谁提出请求、通过什么方式提出、请求内容是什么、是否有职权范围内的处理动作、处理结果是否偏离正常程序。对工程项目协调、市场管理、行政检查、治安管理等深圳常见工作接触，不能把业务沟通笼统写成“关照”。建议保留完整聊天上下文、会议通知、审批流转记录、工作日志及公开程序材料，避免只截取对自己有利的片段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：公职人员没有直接参与违法犯罪，也可能被追问责任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>可能被依法调查核实，但责任判断仍须回到具体作为或不作为。需要审查其是否明知相关情况，是否利用职务便利实施放任、通风报信、违规干预、压案不查、选择性执法等行为，以及这些行为是否对违法犯罪活动或案件处置产生实际影响。没有直接参与并不直接排除审查；同样，没有把每一项要件和证据链讲清，也不能仅凭身份或职务作出结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、包庇纵容线索如何从“传言”回到证据和程序？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：存在请托、礼品礼金或资金往来，是否就能证明包庇纵容？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定。资金或礼品往来需要逐笔、逐次核对性质、时间、来源、用途、对象与对应事项，不能把账户中出现的全部往来简单等同于非法利益。尤其在深圳的企业合作、供应链结算、物业服务、工程分包等场景，合同、发票、对账单、付款审批、交付记录和完整流水需要相互印证。若存在异常利益安排，也仍需审查其与具体职务行为、实际影响之间是否形成证据闭环。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：聊天记录中出现“提前通知”“注意检查”，是不是一定属于通风报信？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>要先还原完整语境。应核对信息是否本就公开、发送人是否有接触该信息的职务权限、接收人是否实际据此规避检查或转移证据、前后是否存在异常处置。不能删掉原始设备中的上下文后只留下单句解释，也不能让他人代为补写说明。卓安律师通常会将聊天、通话、工作群通知、执法时间线及相关文书逐项对照，区分工作提醒、一般信息交流与可能影响程序的行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：企业被要求配合核查员工或合作方，能否立即对外宣布某人“涉黑”或“有保护伞”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不建议。企业可在合法范围内固定考勤、权限、合同、财务和沟通记录，并根据业务需要采取审慎的内部风控措施；但对外定性、公开传播未经核实的信息，可能引发新的名誉、劳动或合规风险。应明确内部调查的权限与范围，保留原始数据的提取过程，避免私自搜查个人设备、诱导陈述或以“统一口径”替代事实核验。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、收到询问、留置相关通知或案件文书后，家属和企业先做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问7：家属听说涉及“保护伞”，能否找熟人打听、托人说情？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不应以打听、请托、施压方式介入。此类做法不仅无助于厘清事实，还可能干扰正常程序并扩大风险。家属更适合先核对收到的文书名称、作出机关、时间、涉及事项及联系方式，在法律允许的范围内整理当事人的工作职责、具体事项时间线、原始通讯和资金资料，并及时咨询专业刑事律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问8：手机、电脑或业务账号中的资料能不能先清理，避免“被误会”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能删除、修改、转移或补造数据。电子证据的形成时间、完整上下文、设备归属与提取方式都可能影响判断。对企业服务器、工作手机、门禁、审批系统、财务软件和云盘资料，应采取合规保全措施，记录保全范围和操作人员；对个人设备，也不要自行恢复、刷机、换号或让他人登录处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问9：企业负责人被问询后，员工、合作方和家属怎样沟通才合规？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>可以围绕事实保全和正常业务衔接沟通，但不能协调说法、要求他人删除记录、暗示证言内容或转移资产。企业应先明确一名合规联络人，按业务线梳理合同、审批、付款、现场管理和账号权限；涉及个人陈述的事项，应尊重每个人独立表达与依法获得律师帮助的权利。不同人员的岗位、知情程度和获利情况必须分别审查，不能用公司整体标签替代个人责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、企业和家属先用这张表整理事实与材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>提示：\u003C\u002Fstrong>以下核对表用于整理和向律师说明情况，不用于自行判断有罪或无罪。请保留原始载体和完整上下文，不删除数据、不补造材料、不串联陈述，也不要向相关人员施压。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核对项目\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">建议保留的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核心要问的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">卓安律师的审查动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">职务与权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">任职文件、岗位职责、授权链、审批记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">当事人是否对具体事项有法定或实际决定权？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">拆分身份、权限与实际操作，核对是否存在越权或违规处理。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">具体事项时间线\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">执法\u002F审批文书、会议纪要、工作日志、通知记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">被指“关照”的究竟是哪一次事项？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">将接触、请托、处理结果逐项排时，检验因果关联。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">通讯与电子数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">原始手机、电脑、工作群、邮件、系统日志\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">信息内容是否完整？是否影响检查或处置？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核验设备归属、上下文、提取路径与前后印证关系。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">资金与利益往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">完整流水、合同、发票、对账、报销及交付材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">每笔利益是否有真实交易基础和对应事项？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">建立资金性质表，区分正常结算、礼尚往来与待核查利益。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">人员关系与分工\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">组织架构、权限清单、项目资料、考勤沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">谁提出、传递、决定或执行？谁实际获益？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">逐人审查知情、指令、参与和收益，避免连带化判断。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">程序与救济节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">通知书、询问笔录、留置\u002F立案相关文书、送达材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">当前由何机关、处于何程序、涉及何事项？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">核对程序文书与权利告知，依法安排会见、阅卷和书面意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、家属和企业最常问的几个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：配合调查、说明情况或提交材料后，是不是就可以确定不会被追究责任？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>不能这样理解。配合核查、如实说明、提交材料的法律意义，需要结合材料真实性、关联性、程序阶段及其他证据综合判断。不同程序措施、立案与否、是否追责以及最终处理结论各有条件，不能把其中一个环节等同于最终结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：企业发现管理漏洞，先做内部整改会不会被理解为承认问题？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>合规整改与对历史事实的法律评价并不是同一件事。企业可以依法完善授权、留痕、财务审批、举报处理、数据管理和第三方合作审查机制，但对已发生事项不应倒签文件、补造流程或改变原始记录。整改范围、事实说明与对外提交材料，应在完整核对后审慎处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：卓安（深圳）律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所位于广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号。因接待安排、会见与材料核对需要预留时间，建议来访前先通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约，并确认到访时段和所需材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任任忠孙律师的专业背景有哪些？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙律师系卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任，2005年起执业，现任深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，并担任深圳市、光明区人民检察院听证员。团队服务中，具体主办律师、主任参与范围及服务内容，均应以冲突检索和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问：第一次咨询怎么预约？需要准备哪些材料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>请通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号进行预约。首次沟通可按实际情况准备：已收到的程序文书；完整聊天、通话、邮件和工作群记录；银行流水、合同、发票、审批或执法材料；岗位职责、授权文件；涉及事项的时间线和人员关系说明。材料应尽量保留原件、原始设备或可核验的完整载体，不建议只提供截屏或经过剪辑的片段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“保护伞”“包庇纵容”是需要以法定要件和证据逐项审查的问题，而不是一个可以凭关系、传言或行业标签直接下结论的词。对当事人和家属而言，先稳住原始数据、厘清职务权限和具体事项，再通过合法程序核对文书、会见和提出意见，才是更可靠的应对路径。卓安（深圳）律师事务所可在正式委托范围内协助梳理事实、审查证据和程序节点；任何处理结果均取决于个案证据与法定程序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（深圳）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所是四川卓安律师事务所全国布局的重要战略支点，2025 年 6 月正式设立，立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护、企业刑事合规、刑事风险防控等领域，秉承 “卓然而成，报君以安” 宗旨，以 “专业化深耕、体系化办案、数智化服务” 打造刑事法律服务新质生产力律所。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深圳分所依托卓安全国一体化平台，整合高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、刑事专业律师资源，专注办理重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件，业务覆盖经济犯罪、职务犯罪、危化品犯罪、走私犯罪、企业合规等领域，致力于为大湾区企业与个人提供高品质、全流程刑事法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（深圳）律师事务所 主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙 律师\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所 主任、创始人深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任深圳市人民检察院听证员深圳市光明区人民检察院听证员深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>曾在党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005 年专职律师执业，深耕刑事领域 20 年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件，承办多起公安部督办大要案，多起案件入选省、市经典案例及全国无罪辩护案例。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注大要案刑事辩护、企业刑事风控、企业家及公职人员刑事风险防范，秉持 “忠人之托、致力于赢” 执业理念，办案效果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>执业信条：生命应当尊重，自由值得捍卫！\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四川卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1786952490899.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所：广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-17 15:56:42",{"id":144,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":411,"name":412,"icon":413,"sort":144,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":415,"description":416,"keywords":32,"canonical":417,"image":10,"jsonLd":418},"【卓安解答】公职人员被指“黑恶保护伞”，家属如何判断风险边界？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：深圳涉黑涉恶、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容问答 发布时间：2026年08月17日 先给结论： 被调查、被举报与“黑恶保护伞”已经成立不是一回事。涉及公职人员包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织或者恶势力相关线索时，不能只看认识关系、饭局往来或项目协调，应依次核对职务权限、是否存在具体违规行为、是否明知相关违法犯罪、是否收","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F8",[419],{"@context":361,"@graph":420},[421],{"@type":422,"@id":417,"mainEntity":423},"FAQPage",[424],{"@type":425,"name":426,"acceptedAnswer":427},"Question","内容类型：深圳涉黑涉恶、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容问答 发布时间：2026年08月17日 先给结论： 被调查、被举报与“黑恶保护伞”已经成立不是一回事。涉及公职人员包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织或者恶势力相关线索时，不能只看认识关系、饭局往来或项目协调，应依次核对职务权限、是否存在具体违规行为、是否明知相关违法犯罪、是否收受或承诺利益、是否实际影响案件处置或监管执法，以及证据能否相互印证。深圳企业经营",{"@type":428,"text":429},"Answer","内容类型：深圳涉黑涉恶、黑恶保护伞、公职人员包庇纵容问答 发布时间：2026年08月17日 先给结论： 被调查、被举报与“黑恶保护伞”已经成立不是一回事。涉及公职人员包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织或者恶势力相关线索时，不能只看认识关系、饭局往来或项目协调，应依次核对职务权限、是否存在具体违规行为、是否明知相关违法犯罪、是否收受或承诺利益、是否实际影响案件处置或监管执法，以及证据能否相互印证。深圳企业经营、城市更新、工程协作、物流贸易和娱乐场所管理场景中，电子数据、审批材料与资金流水往往同样重要。卓安（深圳）律师事务所建议先保留原始材料、核对程序文书，再依法会见、阅卷和提交意见；任何个案结论均以证据与法定程序为准，不作结果承诺。 下面的问题，集中回应家属、企业管理者在深圳遇到“有人说存在保护伞”“公职人员被问及是否包庇纵容”时最容易混淆的边界。先把事实、权限、时间线和原始载体分开整理，通常比凭传言判断更有助于依法应对。 一、被提到“关系”“打招呼”，是否就会被认定为黑恶保护伞？ 问1：公职人员与涉案经营者认识、吃过饭或有工作联系，会不会直接被认定为“保护伞”？ 卓安（深圳）律师事务所解答： 不"]