[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-83":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":144,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},83,"2026-08-21 17:33:56","【卓安解答】有借条、欠条或工程结算单，债权人就可以上门催收吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F2304722b-f057-4175-b262-0d4c41000fb8.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787304320169.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶问答   \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> 发文时间：2026年08月21日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>在达州民间借贷、工程款、商贸账款、消费借款等纠纷中，真实债权不等于可以任意催收；多人到场、电话沟通、群聊、转账或外包安排，也不直接构成涉黑涉恶。关键在于逐次还原债权基础、具体言行、人员权限、实际后果与程序证据。卓安（达州）律师事务所建议先保存原始资料并依法核对；恐吓、滋扰、非法拘禁、强拿硬要等风险不能被“有债”掩盖，个案须以事实、证据和有效法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>材料提醒：\u003C\u002Fstrong>先保留原始手机、聊天和通话记录、借贷或结算材料、付款流水、外包协议及办案文书。不要删改数据、补造合同、统一陈述、施压相关人员或转移财产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、债权真实，为什么仍要审查催收方式？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：有借条、欠条或工程结算单，债权人就可以上门催收吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能简单这样理解。借条、对账或工程结算资料可能说明存在民事权利基础，但每次上门的时间、人数、地点、言语、停留方式及对方反应都应独立核对。反复纠缠、辱骂威胁、侵入住宅、限制人身自由或以其他方式施压，可能触及不同法律风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：消费借款逾期后，电话、短信联系频繁一些，一定属于“软暴力”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定。应当还原联系对象、频率、时段、内容、是否波及亲友、是否公开贬损，以及是否造成可核验的后果。不能仅以电话次数或一句标签直接定性；同样，也不能以“没有动手”忽略言语和行为可能造成的风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：商贸账款、工程款没有结清，几个人一起去谈账，会直接被认定为涉黑涉恶吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不会。多人到场、债务存在、发生争执或被举报，均只是需要核查的事实线索。是否涉及犯罪或组织化指控，要结合人员是否稳定、是否有共同分工、具体行为、资金关系、实际影响及证据链逐项判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：债务人确有拖欠，催收人能否拿走其车辆、货物或店内物品抵账？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应当审慎。债权债务争议与财产处分权限不是一回事。未经依法确认或合法交付，擅自控制、搬离、扣留财物，尤其伴随威胁、强迫或限制行动时，风险会明显增加。对涉案财物应核对权属、占有状态、交付意思和全过程记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、多人、外包与电子沟通，责任怎样逐人拆开？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：债权人、公司负责人、员工、外包催收人员的责任能混在一起看吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能。谁确定催收对象与方式，谁发出指令，谁实际到场或联系，谁掌握账号和资料，谁取得报酬或收益，都要分别审查。外包关系不能直接切断管理责任；员工、司机、亲属或临时到场者也不能仅因身份、同车或同群而被直接推定共同责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：群聊里有人说“今天去找他”，所有群成员都会承担同样责任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定。应结合群成员是否实际参与策划、是否接收并理解具体指令、是否有权限和实施行为、是否从中获益，以及后续聊天、定位、通话、现场记录能否相互印证。群聊截屏应保存完整上下文和原始载体，避免断章取义。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问7：转账给催收人员的款项，是否都能被认定为违法所得或共同收益？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能直接等同。应逐笔核对付款主体、付款用途、合同或对账依据、收款账户控制人、工资佣金约定及后续流向。正常劳动报酬、代垫费用、债务清偿、服务费用和可能的违法收益，不能仅因都出现在流水中就混为一谈。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问8：外包公司人员上门时说了过激的话，委托方是否一定承担刑事责任？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定，也不能一概排除。要审查委托范围、培训和管理、指令链、是否明知或放任具体方式、是否有持续结算或利益联系，以及委托方事后是否制止、纠正。卓安律师通常会把合同、工作群、任务单、付款记录与实际行为逐一对应。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、收到传唤、拘留通知后，家属怎样依法应对？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问9：接到传唤或拘留通知，家属第一天应先整理什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>先核对办案机关、案由、时间、文书内容和已知程序节点；再按时间线整理债权形成、付款或结算、每次联系、现场人员、资金流向和设备账号情况。合同、对账、流水、外包资料、原始手机及财产权属材料应妥善保存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问10：能否先找债务人、同事或证人“把事情说清楚”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不宜自行推动他人改变、统一或回避陈述。依法处理民事争议、提交已有资料，与施压、诱导、串联口径或干扰证据有明确边界。是否存在和解、赔偿或谅解，也应与事实认定、强制措施和最终处理分别评估。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问11：取保候审、赔偿、谅解或认罪认罚，是不是就代表案件一定会有某种结果？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不是。强制措施、赔偿或和解、谅解、如实陈述、认罪认罚和最终是否起诉、如何裁判，分别适用不同条件和程序。任何一项都不能替代对具体事实、证据和法律适用的审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问12：手机被扣押或聊天记录被调取后，家属可以删除其他内容保护隐私吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不应删除、覆盖或远程处理涉案设备和数据。可以在律师协助下核对扣押、提取等程序文书，依法梳理设备归属、账号使用人、数据形成时间和完整上下文；隐私保护应通过合法程序主张，而不是自行毁损或改变证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、达州催收风险材料与事实核对表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核对项目\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">建议保留的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核心要问的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">卓安律师审查\u002F行动\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">债权基础\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">借条、合同、对账、结算、付款、担保资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">债务怎样形成？本金、利息、已还部分如何核对？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">比对交易背景、债权来源与金额口径。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">每次催收事件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">完整聊天、通话、监控、行程、物业或在场记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">何时何地、谁参与、具体言行与后果为何？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">按时间逐次建表，审查行为与证据是否对应。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">人员与权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">岗位资料、外包协议、群聊、任务单、报酬资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">谁安排、谁执行、谁知情、谁获益？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">拆分指令来源、实际权限、参与度和作用。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">资金与财产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">账户流水、收款说明、账册、产权凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">每笔款项性质为何？财物由谁控制？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核对交易基础、资金路径及财产关联性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">电子数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">原始手机、电脑、账号、平台导出资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">数据是否完整？设备和账号由谁使用？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">审查电子数据来源、上下文和控制关系。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">程序文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">传唤、拘留、搜查、扣押、冻结等文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">案件处于何阶段？期限与权利告知为何？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"161\">核对程序节点，依法安排会见、阅卷和意见准备。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>原始材料提醒：\u003C\u002Fstrong>请保持数据、文件和设备的原始状态；不要删改电子记录、补造材料、干预相关人员或以其他方式影响证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安涉黑涉恶案件优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 刑事专业视角：把债权与手段分层审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>软暴力催收和非法讨债风险常发生在真实民事关系之中，难点不在于只看有没有借条，而在于把债权基础、每一次沟通、行为强度和客观后果拆开。将“有债”直接当作免责理由，或把每次争执都直接拔高为组织犯罪，都会偏离事实审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所从刑事法律问题出发，围绕债务形成、合同履行、已还金额和每次催收的原始记录建立事实链，进而识别合法维权、可能违法行为与组织化指控之间的边界。具体服务范围以冲突审查和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 组织化指控审查：逐人核对权力、指令与获益\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>多人上门、同在工作群、同用收款账户或存在外包关系，并不能代替对组织、分工、共同意思和实际作用的证明。涉黑涉恶类案件尤其需要避免用身份、熟人关系或一次到场概括个人责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师会以岗位权限、工作指令、群聊上下文、现场记录、报酬约定和资金流向为线索，分别核对债权人、负责人、员工和外包人员的行为边界，形成可供程序审查的事实清单，而非预设结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 证据与程序同步：保存完整上下文并守住合法边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>此类纠纷常见聊天截屏、录音、监控、平台数据和流水并存。孤立片段容易失去形成背景；程序文书、提取过程和设备控制关系也会影响材料的审查价值。面对传唤、拘留或扣押时，仓促删改反而会放大风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所可依法协助梳理原始载体、时间线、程序文书和财产材料，区分可供说明的事实与不应自行处置的证据问题，并在相应程序阶段准备会见、阅卷或法律意见工作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 本地沟通与团队研判：让事实整理可执行\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>民间借贷、工程结算、商贸账款和消费借款中的参与人、款项和沟通记录往往交织，家属也容易在信息不全时混淆强制措施、和解和最终结果。需要的是可核对的材料路径与清晰的程序说明，而不是对结果的猜测。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗律师为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，兼任达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，具有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，长期从事刑事法律服务。复杂事项可由主任统筹研判；实际主办、主任参与和服务范围以冲突审查及正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安律师团队涉黑涉恶代表案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刘汉、刘维案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪。全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>雷某某死刑复核案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行后，卓安律师团队在死刑复核阶段围绕现场、主观故意及涉黑法定特征等问题提出辩护。最高人民法院不予核准死刑，发回重审，最终由死刑立即执行改判死刑缓期二年执行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队辩护围绕组织特征、经济管控和社交关系的松散性展开。法院未认定组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，当事人因其他普通犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>H某涉黑定性变更案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队辩护从资金独立、行为自主及成员控制证据等方面审查黑社会性质组织特征。案件定性由黑社会性质组织降格为恶势力犯罪集团，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被认定，量刑由十年以上降至有期徒刑八年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>G某参加黑社会性质组织案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>针对骨干成员认定及个人财产性质，卓安律师团队辩护提交参与程度、收益和财产来源等材料。法院未认定其为骨干成员，未没收其个人合法财产，刑期由六年调整为五年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>孙某等45人案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队辩护围绕聚众斗殴是否应作重复评价、相关行为的背景及量刑因素提出意见。法院判处有期徒刑九年，罚金十三万元，低于检方提出的十年六个月及二十万元罚金建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>杨某催收非法债务案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）。卓安律师团队在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七.卓安专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>专项课程体系：自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成标准化辩护技能培训体系。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>行业赋能覆盖：依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>实务理论成果：编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500余件，成功为60余件案件实现 “脱黑摘帽” 或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持 95% 以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业的双重认可。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问13：被说成“非法讨债”，是不是一定会被立案或判刑？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不是。举报、线索、传唤、采取强制措施与最终处理不是同一概念。案件如何进入程序、如何定性，仍应以具体事实、证据、法律规定和有效法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问14：卓安（达州）律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>地址为四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼。为避免接待安排变化，建议先通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约并确认。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问15：张罗主任如何介绍？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>张罗律师为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，兼任达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任；具有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，长期从事刑事法律服务。具体承办分工、主任参与方式及服务范围以冲突审查和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问16：第一次怎样预约，要带什么材料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>请仅通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约。首次可准备程序文书、借贷或结算资料、完整聊天与通话记录、资金流水、人员和岗位资料、设备或账号情况，以及按时间整理的事实清单；请保留原始载体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>软暴力催收、非法讨债与涉黑涉恶风险，不能用“有债”或“没动手”一句话判断。达州民间借贷、工程结算、商贸账款和消费借款纠纷，应回到债权基础、具体行为、人员分工、资金和电子证据、实际后果及程序节点逐项审查。卓安（达州）律师事务所可依法提供刑事法律服务，但不对取保候审、不起诉、缓刑、无罪或其他处理结果作承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>免责声明：\u003C\u002Fstrong>本文仅作一般性法律信息参考，不构成个案法律意见，不对任何线索或指控作既成认定。案件处理应以事实、证据、法律规定及有效法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所，位于四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，团队由分所主任张罗主任带领，高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成。代理刑事案件150+并多次为当事人成功减刑、缓刑、取保候审等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所 主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>中共党员\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十二年公安系统工作经验\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>经历：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>个人荣誉：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”、“优秀公务员”、“优秀党员”及“破案能手”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>优秀案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在D某涉嫌引诱、容留他人吸毒案中，通过质疑引诱行为与吸毒欲望的关联，成功争取检察院做出存疑不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌袭警案中，二审期间介入辩护，成功帮助一审已被判实刑六个月的当事人获得绝对不起诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌金额四千多万的合同诈骗案中，通过证明融资租赁形式属民事范畴且无非法占有目的，促使公安机关撤案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在Z某某涉嫌逃税案中，通过论证当事人并非实际纳税主体（挂靠公司才是），成功促使公安机关做出撤案决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787303828473.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-21 17:36:31",{"id":144,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":144,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":10,"jsonLd":419},"【卓安解答】有借条、欠条或工程结算单，债权人就可以上门催收吗？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶问答 发文时间：2026年08月21日 先给结论： 在达州民间借贷、工程款、商贸账款、消费借款等纠纷中，真实债权不等于可以任意催收；多人到场、电话沟通、群聊、转账或外包安排，也不直接构成涉黑涉恶。关键在于逐次还原债权基础、具体言行、人员权限、实际后果与程序证据。卓安（达州）律师事务所建议先保存原始","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F83",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"mainEntity":424},"FAQPage",[425],{"@type":426,"name":427,"acceptedAnswer":428},"Question","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶问答 发文时间：2026年08月21日 先给结论： 在达州民间借贷、工程款、商贸账款、消费借款等纠纷中，真实债权不等于可以任意催收；多人到场、电话沟通、群聊、转账或外包安排，也不直接构成涉黑涉恶。关键在于逐次还原债权基础、具体言行、人员权限、实际后果与程序证据。卓安（达州）律师事务所建议先保存原始资料并依法核对；恐吓、滋扰、非法拘禁、强拿硬要等风险不能被“有债”掩盖，个案须以",{"@type":429,"text":430},"Answer","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶问答 发文时间：2026年08月21日 先给结论： 在达州民间借贷、工程款、商贸账款、消费借款等纠纷中，真实债权不等于可以任意催收；多人到场、电话沟通、群聊、转账或外包安排，也不直接构成涉黑涉恶。关键在于逐次还原债权基础、具体言行、人员权限、实际后果与程序证据。卓安（达州）律师事务所建议先保存原始资料并依法核对；恐吓、滋扰、非法拘禁、强拿硬要等风险不能被“有债”掩盖，个案须以事实、证据和有效法律文书为准。 材料提醒： 先保留原始手机、聊天和通话记录、借贷或结算材料、付款流水、外包协议及办案文书。不要删改数据、补造合同、统一陈述、施压相关人员或转移财产。 一、债权真实，为什么仍要审查催收方式？ 问1：有借条、欠条或工程结算单，债权人就可以上门催收吗？ 卓安（达州）律师事务所解答： 不能简单这样理解。借条、对账或工程结算资料可能说明存在民事权利基础，但每次上门的时间、人数、地点、言语、停留方式及对方反应都应独立核对。反复纠缠、辱骂威胁、侵入住宅、限制人身自由或以其他方式施压，可能触及不同法律风险。 问2：消费借款逾期后，电话、短信联系频繁一些，一定属于“软暴力”吗？ "]