[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-legal_news-1246":405},{"entity":4,"seo":357},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":201,"caseIntro":233,"latestLawyerNews":234,"lawyerNews":249,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":31,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":333,"homeStats":334,"serviceProducts":347},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,133,141,148,153,158,163,168,173,178,183,188,196],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},793,"Z某被控犯销售伪劣产品罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑并当庭释放","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F46275dd7-888f-477b-a649-7da7e054aaee.png","一、案情简介 被告人Z某等人违反国家烟草专卖规定，生产、销售伪劣雪茄烟，Z某被指控销售金额80余万元，获利10余万元，其行为构成销售伪劣产品罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师一直坚持罪名变更为 非法经营 以及犯罪金额证据不足，否则按照销售伪劣产品","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},792,"J某涉嫌受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F2509a569-50cd-4b01-9a35-19c389e40dd7.png","一、案情简介 J某利用职务便利收受他人财物50余万元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":131,"summary":132,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},791,"Y某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6848d7d9-51e4-41a2-a21f-b54242fcf9d4.png","一、案情简介 Y某因涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪被指定居所监视居住。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见维权工作，同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},790,"Z某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获拘留30天内变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F91b12c44-1a46-4763-8d84-764e429c7273.png","一、案情简介 Z某因购买新注册的企业及法人信息而涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师在接受委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},789,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F0c1f1623-3457-4f21-a1b9-8d9db8ea8b5f.png","一、案情简介 G某涉嫌 敲诈勒索 ，此前在杨巽律师的辩护下争取到30天内 取保候审 ，在取保一年后成功解除强制措施。 二、办案过程 在取保候审期间，杨巽律师定期和案件承办人沟通了解侦查进展，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件的看法和观点，争取","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":151,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},788,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获公安机关变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F5d95a9bf-f0cd-4786-9c53-944ebd5e5bc6.png","一、案情简介 G某因涉嫌 敲诈勒索罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},787,"H某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6205fc11-aded-4213-a806-a8ae5d7ca31f.png","一、案情简介 H某等人通过在百度搜索上购买点击率的方式开展物流运输的宣传，在接到被害人运输邀约后，与被害人谈好运输价格，将货物拉走后，再寻找有运输条件的公司承运。在此期间以控制货物为要挟，向被害人恶意加价运输费用，以被害人不付运费便不能拿货",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},786,"S某涉嫌破坏计算机信息系统罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd31daa6c-1432-41a6-b018-2b4f3b804521.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":166,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},785,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcf03627d-48a9-4e34-9f52-04003b7dca1f.png","一、案情简介 W某通过他人介绍注册“万合足球”APP，进而利用注册的APP进行足球赌博违法活动。期间，W某为营利，在明知“万合足球”APP为赌博网站的情况下，发展直系下线，除自己参与赌球以外，还同时享有其直系下线赌博收益的一部分作为佣金。 ",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},784,"T某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd05d8a88-e0f6-432f-b99e-d33d5bb322a3.png","一、案情简介 T某在明知BKEX交易所是一家利用虚拟货币进行合约交易的非法平台的情况下，在“BKEX”平台任技术部软件开发程序员、市值组组长等职，负责合约交易做市程序的优化与维护，共计获利折合人民币91万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},783,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F76708c65-d57a-4b47-884b-ce34ceadca3a.png","一、案情简介 Z某因涉嫌 开设赌场罪 罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},782,"S某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护成功获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F4d5c9a3b-e03d-477b-b12c-7627a9a7d0ee.png","一、案情简介 S某进入某公司兼职参与赌博群的管理，在明知公司开发的聊天结算平台主要服务对象为赌客的情况下，仍参与聊天结算平台的运营以及公司的日常事务。 二、办案过程 辩护人接受委托后，立刻前往看守所会见S某，之后与承办人积极沟通，向承办人提",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},781,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院审查起诉阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F78134179-fb68-4594-aa5f-b108499f461c.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌 开设赌场 罪被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},780,"Z某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcffd8721-7adc-4a2a-862d-a102bfc97fe4.png","一、案情简介 Z某因参与介绍未成年卖淫而涉嫌介绍卖淫罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师接受委托后，第一时间和办案单位沟通交流对案件的看法和观点，检察院采纳律师意见对Z某不予批准逮捕，Z某变更强制措施为。之后，杨巽律师继续跟进案件进展，在Z某取保候",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":197,"title":198,"thumbnail":199,"summary":200,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},779,"W某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F074cf8a5-1ce9-48ba-b196-28c4b7516228.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌介绍卖淫罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件",[202,205,210,213,218,221,224,227],{"id":38,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":147,"name":146,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":222,"keywords":223},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":193,"code":195,"name":194,"summary":225,"keywords":226},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":228,"code":229,"name":230,"summary":231,"keywords":232},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":244,"lawyer":248},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[245],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[250,253,266,278,289],{"id":235,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":251},[252],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":254,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":255,"city":256,"caseType":257,"title":258,"thumbnail":259,"content":10,"publishTime":260,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":261,"lawyers":262},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[263],{"id":255,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":267,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":268,"city":269,"caseType":270,"title":271,"thumbnail":272,"content":10,"publishTime":273,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":274,"lawyers":275},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[276],{"id":268,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":274,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":277,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":279,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":280,"city":281,"caseType":239,"title":282,"thumbnail":283,"content":10,"publishTime":284,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":285,"lawyers":286},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[287],{"id":280,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":288,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":290,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":291,"city":292,"caseType":293,"title":294,"thumbnail":295,"content":10,"publishTime":296,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":297,"lawyers":298},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[299],{"id":291,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":297,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":300,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":193,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[335,338,341,344],{"value":336,"label":337},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":339,"label":340},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":342,"label":343},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":345,"label":346},"6","全国分所",[348,351,354],{"title":349,"desc":350},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":352,"desc":353},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":355,"desc":356},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":358,"description":13,"keywords":359,"canonical":360,"image":10,"jsonLd":361},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[362],{"@context":363,"@graph":364},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[365,371],{"@type":366,"@id":367,"url":360,"name":7,"inLanguage":368,"publisher":369},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":372,"@id":370,"name":7,"url":360,"logo":373,"image":373,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":368,"address":374,"geo":377,"department":379},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":376},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":378,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[380,385,389,393,397,401],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":383,"parentOrganization":384},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":386,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":387,"parentOrganization":388},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":390,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":391,"parentOrganization":392},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":394,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":395,"parentOrganization":396},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":398,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":399,"parentOrganization":400},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":402,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":403,"parentOrganization":404},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":370},{"entity":406,"seo":417},{"id":407,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":408,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":38,"title":409,"thumbnail":410,"content":411,"publishTime":412,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":413},1246,"2026-09-15 14:02:54","本周刑事新闻与家属须知｜ 卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fef406377-3a94-4ed7-8622-8009313970d1.png","\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">本期聚焦网络犯罪共犯边界、不起诉听证与刑期折抵，并梳理川内职务、金融犯罪宣判。卓安刑事团队与您共读本周刑事动态。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 1 条】最高人民法院发布人民法院网络法治典型案例，明确为跨境赌博提供技术支持构成开设赌场共犯\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：\u003C\u002Fspan>2026 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 16 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日，最高人民法院发布人民法院网络法治典型案例，共\u003C\u002Fspan> 4 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">件，涉及网络暴力中人格权侵害禁令的适用、带货主播侵害他人人格权的责任认定、搜索引擎服务提供者的侵权责任认定，以及为跨境赌博提供网络技术支持服务的定罪量刑。其中“黄某等人开设赌场案”明确：明知是跨境赌博集团，仍按其安排提供软件开发、技术支持等服务的，构成开设赌场共同犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fef406377-3a94-4ed7-8622-8009313970d1.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安律师解读】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">本案裁判要点在于共犯认定边界。《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 303 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条第\u003C\u002Fspan> 2 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">款规定了开设赌场罪；两高一部《关于办理跨境赌博犯罪案件若干问题的意见》明确，明知是赌博网站而为其提供软件开发、技术支持、资金结算等服务的，以开设赌场罪共犯论处。“明知”不以行为人自认为限，可结合服务内容、报酬标准、规避监管方式等推定。实务启示：技术中立不等于责任中立，收取明显异常报酬的“外包开发”同样可能入罪；为境外赌博平台提供推广、支付通道或账号租售的，亦可能纳入共犯评价。辩护重心落在“明知”能否成立与作用大小的区分上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 2 条】四川达州通川区：公交司机故意伤害案经公开听证后不起诉，同步监督处罚挑衅乘客\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：据最高人民检察院\u003C\u002Fspan> 2026 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 15 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日消息，四川省达州市通川区人民检察院对一起公交司机故意伤害案召开拟不起诉公开听证会。今年年初，公交车驾驶员向某停车等候老年乘客投币，乘客李某认为耽误上班而持续辱骂，向某击打李某面部并将其推倒，致李某轻伤二级。案发后向某主动投案，赔偿损失\u003C\u002Fspan> 3.2 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">万元并取得谅解。结合听证意见，该院对向某作出不起诉决定，同时监督公安机关对率先辱骂挑衅的乘客予以治安处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F35d7eb8c-6dd9-4a09-a0b4-42f50cf1fb4c.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安律师解读】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">本案呈现酌定不起诉与行刑反向衔接两项制度。依《刑事诉讼法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 177 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条第\u003C\u002Fspan> 2 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">款，犯罪情节轻微、依法不需要判处刑罚或者免除刑罚的，检察院可以作出不起诉决定；依第\u003C\u002Fspan> 288 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，因民间纠纷引起、可能判处三年有期徒刑以下刑罚的侵犯人身权利犯罪，当事人和解的可以从宽处罚。新修订的《人民检察院审查案件听证工作规定》明确，拟作不起诉且争议较大的案件，认为有必要时应当召开听证会。本案要点还在于被害人过错：检察机关在不起诉的同时建议公安机关审查率先辱骂者的行政责任，说明“谁受伤谁有理”并非刑事追责的当然逻辑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 3 条】检察日报：山西吉县纠正一起刑期计算错误，遗漏的 9 天异地羁押期获折抵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：据《检察日报》\u003C\u002Fspan>2026 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 15 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日报道，山西省吉县检察院纠正一起刑期计算错误案件。罪犯芦某于\u003C\u002Fspan> 2019 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 6 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 20 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日至\u003C\u002Fspan> 28 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日被异地临时羁押，\u003C\u002Fspan>6 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 29 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日被刑事拘留；公安机关移送审查起诉时遗漏异地羁押证明文书。\u003C\u002Fspan>2020 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 11 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月，法院判处其有期徒刑七年，刑期自\u003C\u002Fspan> 6 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 29 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日起算，未折抵前\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">天。该院核实后制发《纠正违法通知书》与检察建议，法院裁定折抵刑期。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F1aae7b4c-8add-4ac1-84e9-3309eff122dc.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安律师解读】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">刑期折抵是当事人实体权利中最易被忽略的一项。依《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 47 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，有期徒刑的刑期自判决执行之日起计算，判决执行以前先行羁押的，羁押一日折抵刑期一日。本案暴露的实务风险在于卷宗材料移送不完整：异地临时羁押形成的证明文书若未随案移送，审判机关计算刑期起算日时便可能遗漏。检察机关的监督路径有两条——对侦查机关履职不规范制发《纠正违法通知书》，对判决疏漏制发检察建议。实务启示：涉案人员及家属收到判决书后，应逐项核对刑期起算日、先行羁押起止日期与折抵天数。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 4 条】检察日报：湖南检察机关对徐宗祥涉嫌受贿、利用影响力受贿案提起公诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：据最高人民检察院消息，中国铁路通信信号集团原总经理徐宗祥涉嫌受贿罪、利用影响力受贿罪一案，由湖南省邵阳市监察委员会调查终结移送审查起诉，经湖南省人民检察院指定管辖，由邵阳市人民检察院依法向邵阳市中级人民法院提起公诉。指控其利用职务便利为他人谋取利益，非法收受财物，数额特别巨大；退休后利用原职权或地位形成的便利条件，通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行为为他人谋取不正当利益，非法收受财物，数额巨大。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fe3b85009-3196-4d3f-a552-97cc3b1acac6.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安律师解读】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">本案的解读价值在于“利用影响力受贿罪”。《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 388 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条之一规定，国家工作人员的近亲属或者其他关系密切的人，通过该国家工作人员职务上的行为，或者利用其职权、地位形成的便利条件，通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行为，为请托人谋取不正当利益并索取、收受贿赂的，构成该罪；离职的国家工作人员及其近亲属、关系密切的人实施上述行为的，同样适用。与受贿罪的区别在于主体身份及是否利用本人职务便利。实务启示：退休不构成免责事由；代为收受财物、居间转达请托的，同样可能被单独评价为犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 5 条】四川广元中院：四川农商联合银行原副行长刘杰违法发放贷款、受贿案一审宣判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：\u003C\u002Fspan>2026 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 16 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日，四川省广元市中级人民法院一审宣判四川农商联合银行原副行长刘杰违法发放贷款、非国家工作人员受贿、受贿案。法院对上述三罪数罪并罚，决定执行有期徒刑十三年。经查，其任凉山州农村信用联社副主任等职期间违规发放贷款\u003C\u002Fspan> 13.9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">亿元，非法收受财物共计\u003C\u002Fspan> 1561 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">万余元。因其到案后如实供述、自愿认罪认罚、积极退赃，依法从轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F5729476f-e948-4e11-b922-5beb03201388.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属温馨提醒】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">本案涉及罪名交叉，涉案人员及家属容易混淆。违法发放贷款罪规定于《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 186 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条；非国家工作人员受贿罪规定于第\u003C\u002Fspan> 163 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，受贿罪规定于第\u003C\u002Fspan> 385 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，二者的核心区别在于行为人是否属于国家工作人员。依第\u003C\u002Fspan> 69 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，判决宣告以前一人犯数罪的，应当数罪并罚。本案从轻的关键依据是如实供述、自愿认罪认罚与积极退赃。需要提示的是：退赃退赔应通过办案机关依法进行并留存凭证，不宜自行与相关方私下处置或转移资产；同时不得就案件事实串供、不得干扰证人作证，此类行为可能被单独评价并影响从宽幅度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 6 条】最高检：北京检察机关对人保集团原副总裁于泽涉嫌受贿案提起公诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：据最高人民检察院\u003C\u002Fspan> 2026 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 15 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日消息，中国人民保险集团原副总裁于泽涉嫌受贿一案由国家监察委员会调查终结，移送审查起诉。经最高人民检察院交办，北京市人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对其作出逮捕决定，北京市检察院第二分院已向北京市第二中级人民法院提起公诉。指控其利用担任太平保险有限公司天津分公司总经理、中国人保集团副总裁等职务便利，为他人谋取利益，非法收受财物，数额特别巨大。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fa777667a-e4de-4828-9803-7d4fcf596f2d.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属温馨提醒】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">职务犯罪案件在程序上有别于普通刑事案件，须经“监察调查—移送审查起诉”两个阶段，本案即由国家监委调查终结后移送。依《刑事诉讼法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 173 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，人民检察院审查案件应当讯问犯罪嫌疑人，告知其享有的诉讼权利，并听取辩护人、值班律师、被害人及其诉讼代理人的意见；辩护人提出书面意见的应当附卷。审查起诉阶段是影响案件走向的关键窗口：罪名是否调整、是否认定自首或坦白、退赃退赔如何评价，多在此阶段形成。涉案人员及家属可依法委托辩护律师查阅、摘抄、复制案卷并提出意见；亦不得与同案人员串供。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 7 条】四川法治报：成都新津一被执行人利用执行和解转移财产，被判拒执罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：据《四川法治报》\u003C\u002Fspan>9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 15 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日报道，成都新津区法院审结一起拒不执行判决、裁定案。\u003C\u002Fspan>2023 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年，该院受理郭某军与周某合同纠纷案，查封其商铺并判其支付周某\u003C\u002Fspan> 15.85 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">万元。判决生效后，双方提交《执行和解协议》并解除查封；同年\u003C\u002Fspan> 12 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月，郭某军将共有商铺无偿转让给张某。后因其未履行和解协议，周某恢复执行时发现商铺已转移。郭某军在侦查阶段履行完毕义务，法院以拒不执行判决、裁定罪判处罚金\u003C\u002Fspan> 6000 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F494dc4ac-fa2a-466e-a101-a352e742df6d.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属温馨提示】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">拒执罪的行为方式不限于积极对抗。《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 313 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条规定，对人民法院的判决、裁定有能力执行而拒不执行，情节严重的，构成拒不执行判决、裁定罪；被执行人无偿转让财产、致使判决、裁定无法执行的，属于司法解释列举的情节严重情形。本案中，行为人借助执行和解解除查封后迅速无偿转让财产，法院认定其规避执行的恶意明显。需要提示的是：履行义务与从宽评价直接相关——本案被告人在侦查阶段履行完毕义务，最终仅被判处罚金。涉案人员及家属不宜以变更登记、代持、无偿赠与等方式处置已被查封的财产。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第 8 条】最高检：天津静海一行为人收购国家二级保护野生动物苍鹰并制成标本获刑，同时承担公益赔偿\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>新闻事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">：据最高检\u003C\u002Fspan> 9 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 12 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日消息，\u003C\u002Fspan>2024 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">年\u003C\u002Fspan> 11 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月，天津静海区王某以\u003C\u002Fspan> 1000 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">元收购苍鹰一只在家饲养。苍鹰系国家二级重点保护野生动物，因饲养不当死亡后，王某将其制成标本摆在家中。今年\u003C\u002Fspan> 4 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月，公安机关从一起贩卖野生动物案件中发现其购买记录而案发。\u003C\u002Fspan>8 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">月\u003C\u002Fspan> 25 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">日，法院以危害珍贵、濒危野生动物罪判处其有期徒刑六个月、缓刑一年，并处罚金\u003C\u002Fspan> 5000 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">元，另赔偿野生动物资源损失\u003C\u002Fspan> 2.5 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F968c9582-149f-40f9-b0ad-996254777fba.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"width: 50%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属温馨提示】\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">破坏野生动物资源的行为不因“自用观赏”而免于刑事评价。《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 341 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条第\u003C\u002Fspan> 1 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">款规定，非法猎捕、杀害或者非法收购、运输、出售国家重点保护的珍贵、濒危野生动物及其制品的，构成该罪。涉案物种以司法鉴定意见认定，国家重点保护野生动物的整体价值直接影响量刑档次。本案另一要点是刑事检察与公益诉讼检察一体推进：行为人除承担刑事责任，还须通过刑事附带民事公益诉讼赔偿国家野生动物资源损失。依《刑法》第\u003C\u002Fspan> 72 \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">条，符合法定条件的可宣告缓刑；本案获缓刑，与认罪悔罪、积极修复生态等情节相关。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于卓安】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所2013年创立，是中国首批只专注刑事业务的精品专业化律师事务所，创始人成安博士深耕刑事领域27年。律所现有近百名专职刑事律师，其中11位博士、30余位硕士，三分之一具有公检法背景；累计办理刑事案件8000余件，出版专著65部、论文203篇，开展培训800余场覆盖12万余人次。律所总部位于成都，并在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁设立分所。「为生命辩护，为自由辩护」。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本期资讯由卓安律师事务所整理发布，仅供法律资讯参考，不构成个案法律意见。如需咨询，请联系卓安律所。\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 11:01:57",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":414,"name":415,"icon":416,"sort":38,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"legal_news","法律新闻","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fab9110f1-5d7c-47e0-b8ee-910a33edc94f.png",{"title":418,"description":419,"keywords":32,"canonical":420,"image":410,"jsonLd":421},"本周刑事新闻与家属须知｜ 卓安律师事务所 - 法律新闻 | 四川卓安律师事务所","本期聚焦网络犯罪共犯边界、不起诉听证与刑期折抵，并梳理川内职务、金融犯罪宣判。卓安刑事团队与您共读本周刑事动态。 【第 1 条】最高人民法院发布人民法院网络法治典型案例，明确为跨境赌博提供技术支持构成开设赌场共犯 新闻事实 ： 2026 年 9 月 16 日，最高人民法院发布人民法院网络法治典型案例，共 4 件，涉及网","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Flegal_news\u002F1246",[422],{"@context":363,"@graph":423},[424,431],{"@type":425,"@id":420,"url":420,"headline":409,"description":419,"datePublished":426,"dateModified":427,"author":428,"publisher":429,"articleSection":415,"inLanguage":368,"image":430},"NewsArticle","2026-09-18T11:01:57+08:00","2026-09-15T14:02:54+08:00",{"@id":370},{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fef406377-3a94-4ed7-8622-8009313970d1.png",{"@type":432,"itemListElement":433},"BreadcrumbList",[434,437,439],{"@type":435,"position":6,"name":436,"item":360},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":435,"position":38,"name":415,"item":438},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Flegal_news",{"@type":435,"position":35,"name":409,"item":420}]