[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-popularize-904":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":35,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},904,"2026-10-20 15:12:04","在多地拿项目的公司被立案，合规整改做到什么程度评估才会通过？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F20\u002Fd945d816-8e79-423f-ac51-6ded3650ff37.jpg","\u003Ch2>摘要\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>公司立案以后，企业主面前通常只有两条路：死扛不认，或者全认了求轻判。两条路争的都是罪轻罪重。还有一条路不问这个，它问的是：这家企业还有没有改造的可能，值不值得让它活下去。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这条路叫涉案企业合规整改。它不是一部新法律，出口是现成的几条：认罪认罚从宽、犯罪情节轻微不起诉、免予刑事处罚。企业把制度建起来、把漏洞堵上、把历史问题处理掉，这些条文才有可写的内容。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>但整改不是写一份方案、开几次会、挂几块牌子。它实质上是三次切割：单位意志和个人行为、历史行为和现行制度、企业存续和个人责任。切得清，评估才过得了；切不清，方案写得再厚也只是作业。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>下面按五个问题展开，从能不能进程序，讲到现场看什么、哪些动作会把机会做没。后面附三个真实案例和法律依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>一、公司被立案之后，除了硬辩和认罪，还有没有第三条路？\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先说结论：有。但这条路换来的不是无罪，是把企业和人分开处理，让该承担的责任落到该落的人头上，让还能经营的部分继续经营下去。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>立案之后，被反复讨论的通常是两条路：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>硬辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 从事实和法律上否认犯罪，争的是不构成、证据不足、数额有误。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>认罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 认罪认罚，退赃退赔，争取从宽，争的是判轻一点。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>这两条路争的都是罪轻罪重。还有一条路不问这个，它问的是：\u003Cstrong>这家企业还有没有改造的可能。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这条路叫涉案企业合规整改。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>它没有自己的独立条文。它的出口是现成的：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十五条规定的认罪认罚从宽，是入口。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十七条第二款规定，犯罪情节轻微，依照刑法规定不需要判处刑罚或者免除刑罚的，人民检察院可以作出不起诉决定。这是主要的落点。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十七条规定，犯罪情节轻微不需要判处刑罚的，可以免予刑事处罚。这是另一个落点。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>整改本身不产生从宽，它产生的是让这些条文可以适用的事实。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 企业把制度建起来、把漏洞堵上、把历史问题处理掉，办案机关才有一份可以写进决定书的情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>制度依据是明确的。2021 年，最高人民检察院会同司法部、财政部、生态环境部、国务院国资委、国家税务总局、国家市场监督管理总局、全国工商联、中国国际贸易促进委员会印发《关于建立涉案企业合规第三方监督评估机制的指导意见（试行）》。2022 年，上述部门又印发《涉案企业合规建设、评估和审查办法（试行）》。这两份文件加上各地实施办法，构成目前的规则框架。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>为什么会有这套制度。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 企业犯罪的后果和自然人犯罪不一样。罚一家企业、判一个老板，跟着受影响的是几十上百个员工的工资、上下游的合同、地方的税收。把所有涉案企业一律办停，社会成本没有人承担。整改要解决的，就是把惩罚企业换成改造企业，让案子办完之后市场上还站着这家公司。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>有三条边界要同时说清：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>整改换来从宽，不换来无罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 犯罪事实成立是前提，整改处理的是处理方式，不是定性。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>企业整改不当然免除个人责任。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十条、第三十一条确立的双罚制，对单位判处罚金，同时对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员判处刑罚。企业可以留下，人的责任要单独看。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>不是所有案件都能启动。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 门槛在下一节。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>还有一处容易混淆的地方，值得单独说明：\u003Cstrong>合规体检和合规整改不是一回事。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">合规体检\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">合规整改\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">时点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">立案之前\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">立案之后\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">发起方\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">企业自己\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">办案机关与第三方机制\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">验收方\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">企业自己\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">第三方组织出具考察报告\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">目的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">把风险挡在立案之前\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">把已经发生的责任处理到位\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>体检做得好，不等于整改过得了。整改是让别人来验，验的标准不由企业定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>二、什么样的企业能进这个程序，什么样的进不去？\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先说结论：三个条件要同时具备，缺一个就启动不了；四类情形基本被排除在外。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>适用案件的范围先说清。前述指导意见把范围定在企业在生产经营活动中涉及的犯罪，既包括单位犯罪案件，也包括实际控制人、经营管理人员、关键技术人员等实施的与生产经营活动密切相关的犯罪案件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这句话里有一个常被忽略的信息：整改的对象不一定是企业，也可能是企业里的人。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 老板个人涉罪，只要这个罪与生产经营密切相关，同样可以申请适用。这也是为什么整改对企业和高管两头都有意义。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）三个条件要同时具备\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>涉案企业、个人认罪认罚。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 注意主语是企业和个人，两头都要。企业认、人不认，或者人认、企业不认，程序都会卡住。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>企业能够正常生产经营，承诺建立或者完善合规制度，具备启动第三方机制的基本条件。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>企业自愿适用第三方机制。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一条不是形式，它是后面所有配合义务的来源。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch3>（二）四类情形基本被排除\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Col>\u003Cli>个人为进行违法犯罪活动而设立公司、企业的。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>公司、企业设立后，以实施犯罪为主要活动的。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>涉嫌危害国家安全犯罪、恐怖活动犯罪的。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>其他不宜适用的情形。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch3>（三）两处企业容易误判的地方\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一处是第二条里的\"能够正常生产经营\"。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一条不是看账上还剩多少钱，是看四件事：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>有没有在持续发生的真实业务\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>有没有在岗员工，社保是不是还在缴\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>有没有在手合同、在手项目\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>有没有被吊销、注销、列入严重违法失信名单\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>空壳公司、已经停摆的公司、靠涉案业务活着的公司，进不去。反过来说，\u003Cstrong>案发后急着停业、遣散、注销，是不该做的动作之一\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这些动作会直接把第二条打掉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二处是认罪认罚和硬辩的冲突。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>常见的情形是：企业想整改，老板想做无罪辩护。这两件事在同一个案子里很难同时成立，因为整改的前提是承认存在问题，无罪辩护的前提是否认。\u003Cstrong>这是一道必须提前做的选择题。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>企业和高管可以分别作答，但代价要说清。企业认罪、个人不认罪，企业这一侧的程序可能推进，个人的从宽空间会被压缩。个人认罪、企业不认罪，单位犯罪的基础就没有了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这道题没有标准答案，取决于证据。证据扎实、翻案空间小，整改是更现实的路；证据本身有硬伤、数额计算有问题，先把事实争下来再谈整改，顺序不能倒。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>三、整改方案怎么写，才不像是照着模板交的作业？\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先说结论：评估看的不是方案的厚度，是三件事有没有被切开。切开的是责任，不是关系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>待评估的整改方案，多数长一个样子：成立合规委员会、制定合规手册、开展全员培训、设立举报邮箱。这四句话放在任何企业、任何罪名上都成立，也正因为如此，它证明不了任何事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>有内容的方案，做的是三次切割。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）第一次切割：把单位意志和个人行为切开\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>要回答的问题是：\u003Cstrong>这个行为是谁决定的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>材料对应关系如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>谁提议：会议纪要、邮件、微信记录、立项文件\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>谁审批：审批单、签字、系统审批日志\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>谁执行：岗位职责书、操作记录、经办人签字\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>谁获益：资金流向、分红记录、报销凭证\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>这里有两种常见错误，方向相反，后果一样重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一种是\u003Cstrong>为了保老板，把什么事都说成公司决定\u003C\u002Fstrong>。结果企业被认定为单位犯罪，罚金、失信记录、资质受限一并落下，企业这个主体反而保不住。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>另一种是\u003Cstrong>为了保公司，把什么事都推给一个已经离职的中层\u003C\u002Fstrong>。评估组只要调一下审批权限和资金流水，就能看出这个人有没有可能做出这个决定。一旦被认定为顶包，整份方案的可信度归零，比不整改更糟。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>切割不是甩锅。\u003Cstrong>切割是把责任放到它本来该在的位置，让评估组相信这家企业有能力看清自己。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）第二次切割：把历史行为和现行制度切开\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这一层在方案里经常被跳过。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>多数方案只写今后将如何，不写过去那一批怎么处理。而评估组先问的，恰恰是后者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>历史问题要处理的有三件：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>人怎么处理\u003C\u002Fstrong>：本案相关人员的内部问责有没有书面决定，有没有处理记录，有没有移送\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>损失怎么弥补\u003C\u002Fstrong>：税款补缴、退赔、追偿、违约金，有没有凭证\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>存量怎么清理\u003C\u002Fstrong>：旧合同、旧供应商、旧账户、旧授权，有没有逐项排查和终止记录\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>现在要建立的制度，必须是\u003Cstrong>针对本案漏洞的专项制度\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不是通用合规手册。虚开案的方案里写反商业贿赂，等于告诉评估组你没搞清自己错在哪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）第三次切割：把企业存续和个人责任切开\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>整改的目标不是让所有人免责，是让不该垮的部分不垮。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这一段要有材料，不能只讲情怀。要能说清三件事：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>哪些业务、哪些岗位、哪些人员与本案无关\u003C\u002Fstrong>，有无人员名单、岗位说明、业务清单\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>企业的资质、许可证、在手项目为什么必须保留\u003C\u002Fstrong>，有无证照、合同、履约进度\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>企业停摆会产生什么后果\u003C\u002Fstrong>，有无员工人数、社保缴纳、上下游合同、在建项目\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch3>（四）一条合格的措施，标准是能被抽查\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>判断方法很简单：这句话写出来之后，第三方组织能不能在不提前通知的情况下，随便抽一个时间点、一笔业务，把它复核一遍。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对照两组写法：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>不合格\u003C\u002Fstrong>：加强发票审核，杜绝不合规票据入账。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>合格\u003C\u002Fstrong>：单笔超过一定金额的采购，须由采购、财务、法务三方在系统中分别留痕；发票、合同、入库单、付款流水四者编号关联；任一环节缺失，系统自动拦截并生成台账；拦截记录保存不少于五年。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>差别不在措辞，在后一句里每个动作都对应一个可以被调取的记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>按罪名对症的常见落点，可以直接对照：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>虚开、逃税\u003C\u002Fstrong>：供应商准入与年审、四流一致校验、关联交易定价、异常发票预警\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>商业贿赂\u003C\u002Fstrong>：佣金与返利规则、第三方付款审查、招待与礼品标准、招投标环节隔离\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>职务侵占、挪用资金\u003C\u002Fstrong>：资金审批权限、印章与网银 U 盾分管、关联方往来台账、月度对账\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>合同诈骗\u003C\u002Fstrong>：合同评审与授权、履约能力评估、预付款与定金管理\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>串通投标\u003C\u002Fstrong>：投标授权、报价审批、保证金来源核查\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>这张表的作用，是让方案从我们会注意，变成我们在某个节点上装了一道闸。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>四、第三方监督评估到企业现场，到底在看什么？\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先说结论：不看方案写得怎么样，看方案有没有落到单据上；不听管理层怎么说，听一线员工怎么说。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>程序上，第三方组织由第三方机制管委会选任，通常由律师、注册会计师、税务师等专业人员组成，职责是对企业合规计划的履行情况做监督评估，出具合规考察报告。考察期长短由办案机关结合整改难度确定，不是企业自己定的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>现场核查通常看四件事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）制度有没有落到流程上\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>有制度文本是一回事，制度进了系统是另一回事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>要看的是：制度有没有对应的审批节点、有没有责任岗位、有没有触发条件、有没有例外处理规则。只写在手册里、没有进系统的制度，在评估里基本等同于没有。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）记录有没有连续性\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>整改期的会议记录、培训签到、审批单据、异常处理台账、内部举报处理记录，看的是有没有断点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>断点比缺失更麻烦。缺失可以解释成还没来得及做，断点说明做了一段就停了。整改期内中断过的动作，评估时通常不计入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）人有没有被真正问责\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>本案相关人员的处理结果，是评估里的硬指标。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>要看三件事：责任人有没有被处理、关键岗位有没有换人或者调整权限、同类岗位有没有做排查。\u003Cstrong>只改制度不动人，等于告诉评估组这个制度只是给外面看的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）整改期内有没有新问题\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这一项的分量比其他三项都重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>整改期是一个特殊时期。企业在这段时间里的每个动作，都在被观察，也都在成为材料。同类行为再发生一次，前面的工作会被整体否定，因为它证明制度没有真正生效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>现场常用四种核查方法，企业提前知道这四种，准备才有方向：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>穿行测试\u003C\u002Fstrong>：随机拿一笔真实业务，从合同、审批、执行到付款走一遍，看每个节点是否按新制度执行\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>抽样复核\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在整改期内的单据里随机抽取，逐份核对留痕\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>分层访谈\u003C\u002Fstrong>：管理层、中层、一线员工分开谈，看说法是否一致\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>数据比对\u003C\u002Fstrong>：系统日志、银行流水、发票数据、纳税申报四者交叉核对\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这里有一个常被忽略的错位。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 第三方组织出的是考察报告，办案机关参考报告作决定，报告不是决定。企业如果把全部精力放在让评估组满意，却说不清犯罪事实、损失挽回、责任划分这三件事，报告写得再好也换不来想要的结果。两边都要顾。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所刑事风控与危机应对委员会下设的企业刑事风控中心，把涉案企业合规整改辅导列为常规业务。做法是先按评估逻辑给企业自查一遍，把断点、缺口、说不清的地方找出来，再动手写方案。顺序反过来的方案，改三遍也过不了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>五、整改期间哪几个动作，会把到手的机会做没？\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先说结论：整改期是一个新的证据生产期。这期间做的每件事都会被记录，六个动作不能碰。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）六个不能碰的动作\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>动资料。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 销毁、篡改、抽换、补记凭证。《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十二条之一规定了隐匿、故意销毁依法应当保存的会计凭证、会计账簿、财务会计报告罪，情节严重的可处五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。原本只是一个罪名，动完资料可能变成两个。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>继续原来的做法。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 整改期内同类行为再发生一次，前面的工作整体清零，这一条没有例外。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>补签、倒签文件。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把整改期补做的文件签成过去的时间。系统日志、纸张年份、快递记录、审批流时间戳，任何一处对不上，整批材料作废，还可能被认定为伪造证据。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>组织统一口径。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 开会交代员工有人问就这么说。访谈是分开做的，一致的说法反而更容易被识别出来。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>转移资产、更换法定代表人、注销关联公司。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这些动作在办案机关眼里是逃避追责的信号，同时会打掉能够正常生产经营这条认定基础。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>对举报人、证人施压。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百零七条规定了妨害作证罪与帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪。这类动作不仅另涉新罪，还会直接摧毁自愿整改的基础。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch3>（二）三件应该坚持做的事\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>建一本整改台账。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 所有整改动作记时间、记经手人、记凭证编号。这本台账在评估时是自己的底稿。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>指定一个有授权的整改负责人。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 有书面授权、有汇报线、有决策权。评估组访谈时找不到能拍板的人，是常见失分项。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>主动报告。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 整改中发现问题，主动向第三方组织和办案机关报告。自己查出来和自己捂着被查出来，在评估里是两件事。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>六、三个真实案例：责任切在什么位置，结果就落在什么位置\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>以下三起案件均由卓安律师团队办理，当事人信息已作脱敏处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一起：主体认定改变，量刑档次跟着改变。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>某地一对兄弟利用离岛免税政策购入商品后转卖，被指控走私普通货物罪，偷逃税款三百六十余万元。按当时的量刑标准，个人走私偷逃税款二百五十万元以上，法定刑在十年以上。办案团队梳理了两人名下公司的运营记录，发现公司早在数年前就已设立，有组织架构和职责分工，长期从事合法经营，收益归公司并用于经营。据此提出应按单位犯罪处理的意见。法院采纳后，两人分别被判处有期徒刑三年半和一年半。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这起案件的着力点不在整改，在切割。\u003Cstrong>责任落在企业还是落在个人头上，直接决定量刑档位。整改之前先把这个位置找准，方案才有意义。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二起：整改方案落地，整改效果写进了量刑意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>某实业公司销售总监与销售服务部副经理，因公司为六家企业虚开增值税普通发票二百六十余万元、造成税款损失六十五万元被起诉。案发后税款全部补缴。辩护中，办案团队提交了涉税合规整改方案，推动企业建立预付卡管理制度，并把整改的实际效果写入量刑意见。法院最终对两人分别判处缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这起案件说明一件事：\u003Cstrong>整改不是只对企业有用。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 企业把制度改了、把漏洞堵了，这个事实会变成责任人员从宽的理由，因为它证明单位层面的问题已经被处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三起：税额未达标准，加上补缴和建议适用合规程序，最终不起诉。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>某医药链条中的当事人为药材销售方，通过生产、销售企业开票，形成三家公司之间的双环开票结构，涉及税额九万余元。案件移送审查起诉后，办案团队核对了两件事：一是涉案税额没有达到虚开增值税专用发票罪的立案标准；二是下游企业已在立案后补缴税款十六万余元，未实际造成税款损失。在此基础上建议全案适用合规程序，同时把这两项事实一并提交。检察机关最终作出不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这起案件的顺序值得记住：先讲法律标准，再讲损失弥补，之后才谈整改。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 整改是加分项，不是免罪牌。把它放在第一位，反而会让人怀疑在回避事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三起案件放在一起，指向同一个判断：\u003Cstrong>整改能不能起作用，取决于前面的责任切割做得准不准、后面的材料落得实不实。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 方案是收尾的一步，不是第一步。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>七、涉及的主要法律依据\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十条，单位犯罪的认定。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十一条，单位犯罪的处罚，对单位判处罚金，并对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员判处刑罚。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十七条，犯罪情节轻微不需要判处刑罚的，可以免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十二条之一，隐匿、故意销毁依法应当保存的会计凭证、会计账簿、财务会计报告罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百零七条，妨害作证罪与帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十五条，认罪认罚从宽制度。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十七条第二款，犯罪情节轻微，依照刑法规定不需要判处刑罚或者免除刑罚的，人民检察院可以作出不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《关于建立涉案企业合规第三方监督评估机制的指导意见（试行）》，2021 年由最高人民检察院等九部门印发，确立第三方监督评估机制的适用范围、适用条件、不适用情形与运行程序。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《涉案企业合规建设、评估和审查办法（试行）》，2022 年由上述部门印发，规范合规建设、评估与审查的具体流程。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> 祁增燕  卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-20 15:08:46",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":35,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"popularize","人群分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fa79f025c-03af-4818-a0ce-29cecf8e15e9.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"在多地拿项目的公司被立案，合规整改做到什么程度评估才会通过？ - 人群分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 公司立案以后，企业主面前通常只有两条路：死扛不认，或者全认了求轻判。两条路争的都是罪轻罪重。还有一条路不问这个，它问的是：这家企业还有没有改造的可能，值不值得让它活下去。 这条路叫涉案企业合规整改。它不是一部新法律，出口是现成的几条：认罪认罚从宽、犯罪情节轻微不起诉、免予刑事处罚。企业把制度建起来、把漏洞堵上、把","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fpopularize\u002F904",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-20T15:08:46+08:00","2026-10-20T15:12:04+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F20\u002Fd945d816-8e79-423f-ac51-6ded3650ff37.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fpopularize",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]