[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-popularize-983":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":35,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},983,"2026-10-22 16:43:29","青海企业家和公职人员的刑事风控，把风险拦在立案前","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002Fb8887c14-2f67-4b47-b28f-caf9249bc9b4.jpg","\u003Ch2>摘要\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>企业家和公职人员的刑事风险，多数不是突然出现的，而是在几年里一点点累积，直到某个环节被查。人被带走之后，能争的只剩定性、数额和情节，而决定这三项的很多材料，在案发前就已经生成。出事前预警、出事后辩护，说的不是两件事的轻重，而是先后：风控与辩护是接力的关系，谁也替代不了谁，前者管概率，后者管结果。这篇写给青海的企业经营者和公职人员，讲清三件事：风控为什么必须放在辩护之前，两类人的风险结构差在哪，事前预警要落成哪几样可以核查的东西。两类人共用一套逻辑，却不能共用一套方法。风控也不是多写几本制度，是把没有约束的自由裁量减下来。不承诺结果，只给能照着做的判断标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>一、风控为什么必须放在辩护之前\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>说这句话，不是否认辩护的价值。案子已经发生，剩下能做的主要是辩护，这一点没有替代品。风控说的是另一件事：把本来可以不必发生的部分，提前拿掉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）辩护能改变什么，不能改变什么\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>案件进入程序，能争的是三样：行为怎么定性、数额怎么认定、情节够不够从宽。三样都有空间，但都不包括让这件事没发生过。数额核减、单位犯罪与个人犯罪之分、自首退赔与认罪认罚，是实践中最常见的三类空间。\u003Cstrong>时间、决策、资金流向一旦成型，只能解释，不能更改。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 所以风控的第一层作用，是让不该发生的事不发生；第二层作用，是让已经发生的事在事后解释得清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）一次立案的真实成本，为什么不止刑期\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>企业经营者被立案，同时发生的是账户冻结、项目停摆、员工工资、上下游违约、资质与投标资格受限、银行抽贷、家庭收入中断。\u003Cstrong>这些成本从立案那天开始计，和最后判几年没有关系。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 公职人员被留置，同时发生的是职务中止、家庭财产被核查、亲属被询问、多年积累的评价清零。\u003Cstrong>判了缓刑，这些也换不回来。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 还有一项常被忽略：案件结束之后，本人与家属在从业、任职、资格审查环节还会遇到长期影响。风控省下的不是律师费，是这一段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）风控把处置时点往前挪了多少\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>风险不是有没有的问题，是什么时候被发现的问题。同一个动作，事前可以改结构、改流程、改留痕；事中可以补救；事后只剩解释。\u003Cstrong>风控的全部工作，就是把处置时点从第三段推到第一段。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 它不是加一本制度手册，是减少没有约束的自由裁量。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>二、企业家最容易在哪五处踩线\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>这五处不是理论分类，是案件里反复出现的入口。它们的共同点在于，问题都不出在不懂法，而出在流程把发起、审批、付款交给了同一个人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>比这五处更容易出问题的，是三种判断：把行政责任当上限，以为最多罚钱；把有合同当安全，以为民事能兜底；把行业惯例当依据，以为大家都这么做就没事。\u003Cstrong>这三种判断的共同点，是把别人的处理结果当成了自己的法律边界。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）钱：公私之间那道墙还在不在\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>个人卡收公司款、备用金长期不销账、股东往来没有借款手续、关联公司之间无对价调资金。\u003Cstrong>这四件事单独看是财务不规范，凑在一起就可能被认定为职务侵占或者挪用资金。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 判断标准只有一条：这笔钱能不能在账上说清来路、去向和依据。三个信号值得马上自查：股东借款超过一年未还、备用金余额长期只增不减、关联方往来没有合同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）票：进项和业务对不对得上\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>虚开案件的入口往往不是故意，而是三种情形：业务真实但票流不一致、为冲成本买票、把无票支出交给别人处理。\u003Cstrong>票、货、款、合同四流是否一致，就是能不能说清的分界线。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 事前要做的，是把不一致的部分先找出来。一个动作就能筛：把去年进项发票按供应商排一遍，看哪几家既没有合同也没有入库记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）人：销售费用由谁支付、以什么名义\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>回扣、返利、好处费，风险不在给不给，在谁给、以什么名义给、钱从哪里出。\u003Cstrong>同样一笔支出，走公司账户、有决策记录、收益归公司，与个人垫付、现金交付、收益归个人，事后是两个罪名、两个量刑档。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一层在事前完全可以设计，要留的只有三样：费用申请单、审批链、收款方与业务方的对应关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）权：审批、用印、关联交易有没有分开\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>一个人能同时发起、审批、付款的公司，出事时很难证明这是公司决定。\u003Cstrong>要看的是三件事：不相容岗位有没有分离、用印有没有登记、关联交易有没有对价依据。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这三样是事后区分单位行为与个人行为的主要材料，缺一样，解释成本就要翻几倍。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（五）政：补贴、招投标、检查时怎么应对\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>申报材料虚增、投标借用资质、检查时提供不实资料，共同点是当时按行政问题处理，事后可能转成刑事。\u003Cstrong>行刑衔接的关口，常常就在一次检查、一份笔录里。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 事前要准备的是应对流程，不是临场反应：谁陪同、哪些材料当场给、哪些需要回来准备，事先要有分工。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>三、公职人员的风控，为什么不能照搬企业那一套\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）身份为什么先决定罪名，再决定程序\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>同一种收钱行为，国家工作人员按受贿处理，非国家工作人员按非国家工作人员受贿处理，量刑起点不同。\u003Cstrong>身份不是形式问题，它决定了由谁办这个案子。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 公职人员由监察机关调查，企业人员由公安机关侦查，两套程序的启动方式、介入时点、家属能做的事都不一样。\u003Cstrong>最容易被误判的一点是：案件由监察机关调查的，在移送审查起诉之前，辩护律师还无法会见。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这段时间家属能借助的外部力量，主要不是会见，而是程序指引和材料准备。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）公职人员哪三个场景最容易出事\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>公职人员这一端，最常见的不是直接收钱，而是有合法外观的三类往来：亲属代持、向管理服务对象借贷收息、以讲课费咨询费名义收取费用。\u003Cstrong>三者的共同点是都有合法外观，能不能说清，取决于有没有真实对价、有没有实际提供劳务、利率是否与市场一致。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这三类情形在调查阶段就会被逐笔核对，事后再补材料，通常对不上时间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）监察程序里的时间窗口从什么时候开始\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>主动交代、退缴的时间点，直接对应后来的从宽幅度。\u003Cstrong>这个窗口在调查阶段就开始计时，不是等到起诉才打开。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 很多家属把这段时间用来打听关系，等明白过来，窗口已经窄了。能做的事其实很具体：把家庭财产来源理清、把合法收入凭证找齐、把不该动的资产停住。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）家属哪几个动作最容易把事做坏\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>找中间人传话、与相关人员统一说法、转移或者代持财产，这三件事在监察程序里都会被记录，性质也会变。\u003Cstrong>原本只是本人的问题，可能因此牵出家属。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 家属真正该做的，是找一位能对接程序的律师，把时间线和财产凭证整理出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>四、事前预警要落成什么，才算真的做了\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>说重视风控没有意义，要看交付了什么。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）岗位风险清单要写到什么颗粒度\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>按岗位列，不按罪名列。采购、销售、财务、招投标、行政申报，每个岗位写清三件事：接触什么钱、有什么权限、哪一步最容易越界。\u003Cstrong>清单要能发到人手上，不能只锁在法务的柜子里。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）权限与留痕，为什么进了系统才算数\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>不相容岗位分离、超额审批、用印登记、合同会签、资金支付双人复核。\u003Cstrong>制度写在手册里不算数，进了系统才算。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 事后核查看的不是有没有制度，是有没有执行记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）年度体检该查异常还是查比例\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>抽样不看比例，看特征：大额、整数、年末集中、关联方、频繁更换的供应商、长期挂账的其他应收款。\u003Cstrong>查出来的问题要有一本台账，写清整改人、时间和凭证。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 台账本身就是事后证明公司有治理的材料。频率上，一年一次常规体检，重大交易或新业务上线前加一次专项。执行上，内部法务能查流程，查不了刑事定性，\u003Cstrong>外部介入的价值在于用办案视角反推证据够不够。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）危机预案要回答哪四个问题\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>谁第一时间对接办案机关、哪些话不能说、哪些材料要先固定、家属由谁统一对外。\u003Cstrong>预案不预测结果，它防的是慌乱中的错误动作。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 不少案子真正的损失，是在头七十二小时做出来的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（五）制度越多，风险是不是越低\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>不是。制度与执行脱节，事后会被当成明知的证据：公司明文禁止收受回扣，销售仍按老办法走，说明决策者知道规则而选择绕过，这一条在量刑时说不出好处。\u003Cstrong>风控要的是制度与系统一致，不是文件的厚度。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 同样的道理，方案里写了十几道审批，实际业务一道没走过，评估时反而会追问为什么。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>五、用三起成功案例举例，风控与辩护各起了什么作用\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>以下三起案件均由卓安律师团队办理，当事人信息已作脱敏处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某公司法定代表人因借贷业务中的资金往来被卷入单位行贿案，一审认定为单位行贿罪，判处有期徒刑二年。二审团队调取借款合同、资金来源与利息支付记录，与同期其他借款利率比对，主张借贷真实、所付利息不应计入行贿金额。二审改判，适用缓刑。\u003Cstrong>这起案子的胜负手在案发之前：合同、流水、利息凭证齐全，才有得辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 对应到事前，就是借款要签合同、利息按市场水平、还款走银行，三样齐全，借贷关系才站得住。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某医疗器械供应商在向两家医院供货过程中，以辛苦费、回扣名义支付费用，被监察机关按个人行贿移送。团队核对三件事：费用由公司财务支出、以公司名义支付、收益归公司且股东未分红，据此主张应认定单位行贿。法院采纳，以单位行贿罪判处有期徒刑三年、缓刑四年。\u003Cstrong>同样的行为，单位犯罪与个人犯罪量刑差着一大截，而这一层在付款那一刻就定了。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 对应到事前，是三件事在账上能对上：钱由谁付、由谁决定、收益归谁。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某公职人员被认定共同受贿六十余万元，争议在数额按共同总额还是按个人实得计算。辩护团队以书证区分各人独立收受的链条，主张按实际所得认定，法院部分采纳，判处有期徒刑三年九个月。\u003Cstrong>公职人员这一端，能争的空间集中在数额与情节，而这两项都依赖事前留下的凭证。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 对应到事前，是个人经手的每一笔钱都有独立凭证，不要把几个人的往来混在同一张卡上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三起案子放在一起看，结论是同一个：\u003Cstrong>辩护决定案子怎么收尾，风控决定案子从哪开始。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师事务所刑事风控与危机应对委员会把这件事拆成两条线，一条是项下五个职能中心，覆盖企业刑事风控、反舞弊与内部调查、监察留置应对、危机处置与证据保全、行刑衔接风险阻断；另一条是公职人员刑事危机应对中心与企业家及企业高管刑事危机应对中心，分别对接两类主体在事前与事中的不同动作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>涉及的主要法律依据\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十条、第三十一条：单位犯罪的认定与处罚，对单位判处罚金，对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员判处刑罚。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十三条：非国家工作人员受贿罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十四条：对非国家工作人员行贿罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百零五条：虚开增值税专用发票、用于骗取出口退税、抵扣税款发票罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十二条、第三百八十五条：贪污罪、受贿罪，主体为国家工作人员。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十九条：行贿罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十三条：单位行贿罪，单位为谋取不正当利益而行贿。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国监察法》：监察对象范围与留置等措施，公职人员职务违法与职务犯罪由监察机关调查。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十五条：认罪认罚从宽。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>祁增燕 卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-22 16:42:17",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":35,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"popularize","人群分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fa79f025c-03af-4818-a0ce-29cecf8e15e9.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"青海企业家和公职人员的刑事风控，把风险拦在立案前 - 人群分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 企业家和公职人员的刑事风险，多数不是突然出现的，而是在几年里一点点累积，直到某个环节被查。人被带走之后，能争的只剩定性、数额和情节，而决定这三项的很多材料，在案发前就已经生成。出事前预警、出事后辩护，说的不是两件事的轻重，而是先后：风控与辩护是接力的关系，谁也替代不了谁，前者管概率，后者管结果。这篇写给青海的企业","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fpopularize\u002F983",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-22T16:42:17+08:00","2026-10-22T16:43:29+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002Fb8887c14-2f67-4b47-b28f-caf9249bc9b4.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fpopularize",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]