[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-popularize-989":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":35,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},989,"2026-10-23 17:42:57","老板为什么一定要重视企业合规：合规真正保护的是老板个人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F175b9911-dd5a-403f-aacc-0a627d74bd35.jpg","\u003Ch2>摘要\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>先问一个直接的问题：合规是给谁做的。多数老板的回答是给监管、给客户、给融资要求。这个回答决定了合规的位置：一份必须交、但不必真用的材料。等到出事，才发现当初做的那套东西，一样也用不上。另一种回答是给老板自己做的，听起来自私，却更接近制度设计的本意。公司一旦有了分支、团队和几个账户，决策就变成靠授权，资金就要过几个主体，办案机关最先问的是三件事：这件事谁定的、钱从哪出、收益归谁。这三问的答案，全部由事前的制度和留痕决定。合规真正保护的不是公司，是老板个人。这篇讲清五件事：合规到底在保护谁，为什么很多公司的合规是废纸，立案之后留下的东西能换回什么，成本差在哪里，老板自己花最小成本能做哪三件。合规不改变结果，只改变可辩的空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一个老板对合规的态度，通常在他第一次被叫去问话时就暴露了。材料能不能翻出来、决定能不能说清、钱能不能对上，这三件事没有一件可以在三天内补出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>一、合规到底在保护谁\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）公司出事，老板个人为什么跑不掉\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>因为单位犯罪实行双罚制，公司被罚，人也判。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十条规定，公司、企业、事业单位、机关、团体实施的危害社会的行为，法律规定为单位犯罪的，应当负刑事责任；第三十一条规定，单位犯罪的，对单位判处罚金，并对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员判处刑罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这句话对老板的含义很直接：公司是公司，责任不止于公司。虚开、串通投标、非法经营、污染环境、单位行贿，这些罪名都可以由单位构成。一旦认定，站在被告席上的除了公司，还有签字的人和拍板的人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>而直接负责的主管人员怎么认定，不看头衔，看四件事：谁决定的、谁批准的、钱从哪出、收益归谁。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这四件事，全部是事前留下的东西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）合规的核心动作是切割\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>合规不是把制度写厚。它处理的是一个具体的技术问题：把单位意志和个人行为分开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断标准只有两条：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>这个决定是不是经过公司程序作出的。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>这笔收益是不是归公司。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>两条都成立，才可能往单位犯罪上靠；两条都不成立，责任就落到具体的人身上。中间那两种情形更常见：经过程序但收益归个人，或者收益进公司但决定没走过程序。\u003Cstrong>前者在司法解释里有明确出口，违法所得由个人私分的，按自然人犯罪处理；后者要看这个决定能不能还原成公司意志，也就是谁批的、依据什么批的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>反过来看也成立：老板想让公司背、自己不背，需要程序；想让公司不背、只由行为人承担，需要程序加记录。两种目的都要程序，差别在于有没有把话说在前面。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这是合规最实用的价值：它不是让坏事不发生，是让坏事发生之后，责任能被放在该放的位置上。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>二、为什么很多公司的合规是废纸\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）制度、系统、记录，缺一样就断\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>合规能不能用，只看三样东西对不对得上：制度怎么写的、系统怎么跑的、记录留下来的是什么。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 三样对上才叫体系，对不上就是三张皮。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>常见的情形是：制度里写了采购必须三方比价，系统里没有必填字段，实际业务由一个人从头走到尾。这套制度只在事后被引用，用来证明公司知道风险，而没有一个人执行。\u003Cstrong>这个方向的作用，和老板想要的正好相反。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断方法很简单：抽一笔去年的真实业务，看能不能在系统里走完整条链，每一步都有时间戳和操作人。走不完，说明这套制度没有落地。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）有制度没记录，事后会被当成明知\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>没有记录的合规，在案卷里等于不存在；被证明存在却没有执行的制度，会被当成明知。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这两个结果差得很远。前者是没做，后者是知道而放任，量刑上更难解释。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以合规真正要沉淀的不是文本，是四类记录：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>会议纪要与决策文件，能看出谁提议、谁反对、谁批准。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>审批流与系统日志，能还原每一步的时间和操作人。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>合同、发票、入库单与资金流水，能对上钱和货。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>异常处理记录与内部问责决定，能证明公司发现过、处理过。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四类凑齐才叫留痕；缺一类，链条就断在那里。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）为什么合规不能从制度开始写\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>顺序错了，写出来的东西就是空的。正确的顺序是先定权限与流程，再配系统字段，最后才写文本。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>多数公司反过来：先请人写一套手册，再让各部门签字，最后归档。这套东西检查时拿得出来，案卷里没有用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>因为制度回答的是应该怎么做，系统回答的是实际怎么做，记录回答的是做没做。\u003Cstrong>能进案卷的主要是后两样。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>三、立案之后，合规留下的东西能换回什么\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）争的不是有罪无罪，是责任落在谁头上\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>多数涉企案件到了立案这一步，争的核心已经从有没有发生，变成谁该为它负责。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一层有三块空间：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>单位犯罪还是个人犯罪。定单位犯罪，公司判罚金，主管人员与直接责任人员判刑；定个人犯罪，责任集中在具体行为人身上。\u003Cstrong>这个选择对老板并不总是单向的：定单位犯罪，公司多一笔罚金和一条前科，老板仍要以主管人员身份担责；定个人犯罪，老板一个人扛，公司和团队保住。哪个更有利，要看数额、情节，还要看会牵进几个人。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>谁是直接负责的主管人员。技术总监、财务负责人、业务负责人，都可能被划进这个范围。\u003Cstrong>一锅端的风险，是落在团队身上的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>责任范围能不能缩小。不知情、不参与决策、只是执行，这些抗辩能不能成立，取决于岗位职责书与审批记录。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch3>（二）数额、情节、从宽，都要有据可查\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>数额核减、自首与退赔的认定、认罪认罚的适用，都要求有对应材料，不能只靠陈述。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>数额一项，靠合同、发票、流水、审计底稿逐笔核对。账和票据本来就清楚的企业，核减有依据；两套账、私户收付、无票支出的企业，核对过程本身会牵出新的问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>退赔一项，靠资金能力和处置顺序。案发后急着转移资产，会把认罪悔罪的空间压掉，同时触发另一重风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>自首与主动交代，靠时间点和记录。什么时候说的、说了多少、有没有书面材料，都影响认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>四、合规的成本，和出事的成本怎么比\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）立案当天的成本与判几年无关\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案子立了，第一天的成本就开始了，与最后判几年无关。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 具体是六项：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>账户与资金。涉案账户冻结，正常结算中断，供应商账期立即收紧。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>资质与资格。投标资格、行业许可、资质年检，多数附带无犯罪记录或者合规审查要求。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>融资。贷款提前到期条款被触发，续贷停止。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>决策。法定代表人、实际控制人被采取强制措施，公司决策停摆。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>团队。核心人员被带走，客户与骨干同时流失。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>长期影响。案件结束之后，本人与家属在从业、任职、资格审查环节仍有后续影响。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这些成本里，只有罚金和刑期写在判决书上，其余都不在，却先发生。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）哪些成本落在老板个人身上\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>公司层面的损失，最终由股东承担。但有四项直接落在个人：人身自由、涉案财产处置，包括家属账户与代持股权；从业与任职限制；家属的生活安排。\u003Cstrong>这四项的共同点是不可替代、不可转让、不可事后弥补。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 合规花的是钱和时间，出事花的是这些。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）合规做到什么程度就够了\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>合规有边界，不是越贵越好。三条达到就可以停：记录能被抽查复核、权限能被分开还原、异常能被发现并处理。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>追着做全套体系，常常变成买一堆文件和一沓培训签到表。判断标准其实只有一条：\u003Cstrong>换一个不熟悉情况的人，能不能凭记录把去年的一笔业务重新走一遍。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 能走通，这套东西事后站得住；走不通，再多文件也只是装饰。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>五、老板自己能做到哪三件事\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）决策留痕\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>凡是超过一定金额、涉及资质与审批、涉及对外支付的事项，都要有一次可以被复述的决策过程。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 具体是三样：谁提议、依据什么、谁批准。形式可以是会议纪要、审批流或者邮件，但必须落在系统里，时间不能倒签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这一条的价值在事后：它是区分单位意志与个人行为的主要材料。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）资金与权限分开\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>同一个事项的发起、审批、付款，不能由一个人完成。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 三件事要分开：不相容岗位分离，公私账户分离，关联方往来有合同有对价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最容易出事的是公私不分。一人公司和家族企业在这个点上格外脆弱：钱从哪个口袋出、进哪个口袋，自己都说不清，一旦要对外证明，几乎无从下手。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）一年一次的四问自查\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>合规要有固定频率，不能等出事才想起来。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四问可以直接照做：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>去年进项发票里，有几家供应商既没有合同也没有入库记录。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>备用金与股东借款，有没有超过一年未清的余额。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>用印登记与合同台账，能不能对上。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>内部举报与异常处理，去年有没有记录。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这四问一年做一次，成本很低；一次都不做，事后的解释成本会翻几倍。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>六、三起案件里，合规留下了什么\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所刑事风控与危机应对委员会办理这类案件时，先看的通常不是罪名，是事发之前的决策记录与资金路径。以下案件由卓安律师团队办理，信息已脱敏。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某化工公司持危险化学品安全生产许可证生产出口十五年，安全生产零事故。2021 年厂区因新建高速公路无法续期，公司为履行境外合同，以调制样品送检、伪报出口品名的方式出口危化品两千余吨，货值三千余万元，被指控非法经营罪与逃避商检罪。办案团队提交了十五年安全生产记录、第三方鉴定、设备维护与人员培训记录，证明许可失效期间仍沿用原标准，并提交异地重建三千万、重新验收取证的整改材料。法院认定不构成非法经营罪，以逃避商检罪定罪，免予刑事处罚。\u003Cstrong>这起案件的胜负手不在庭上，在那十五年：合规积累平时看不出价值，到了量刑阶段，它是能被逐项提交、被逐项核对的事实。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某商业银行原主要负责人被指控挪用资金、违法发放贷款、非国家工作人员受贿三罪，违规审批发放贷款二点七九亿元。办案团队把违法发放贷款这一节拉回单位层面，指出贷款经过贷审会程序、体现单位意志，该节的责任最终落在单位的决策层面，个人责任相应降低；非国家工作人员受贿一节因证据不足，指控不成立；挪用资金一节全额退赃后减轻处罚并适用缓刑。\u003Cstrong>这起案件说明程序值多少钱：同样一次违规放贷，有没有经过贷审会，责任落在谁头上完全不同。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某公司一名员工因涉嫌诈骗被立案。办案团队提出的核心意见是，涉案行为属于单位行为，应当追究主管人员与直接责任人员的责任，该员工所处岗位不具备决策权，不应由其承担。检察机关以事实不清、证据不足作出不起诉决定。\u003Cstrong>这起案件的另一面值得老板记住：单位犯罪认定之后，被追责的是直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员，范围不止一个人。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>七、涉及的主要法律依据\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十条：单位犯罪的成立范围，法律规定为单位犯罪的才负刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十一条：单位犯罪的处罚，对单位判处罚金，并对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员判处刑罚。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十三条：单位行贿罪，为谋取不正当利益以单位名义行贿。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百零五条：虚开增值税专用发票罪，单位可以成为本罪主体。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十三条：串通投标罪，投标人相互串通投标报价，单位可以成为本罪主体。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十二条之一：隐匿、故意销毁会计凭证、会计账簿、财务会计报告罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《最高人民法院关于审理单位犯罪案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》：个人为犯罪设立公司、以犯罪为主要活动、盗用单位名义且违法所得归个人的，不以单位犯罪论处。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国公司法》关于董事、监事、高级管理人员忠实义务与勤勉义务的规定：决策与监督职责的法定依据。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十五条：认罪认罚从宽，以及第一百七十七条第二款：犯罪情节轻微不需要判处刑罚的，可以不起诉。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>祁增燕 卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-24 10:42:27",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":35,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"popularize","人群分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fa79f025c-03af-4818-a0ce-29cecf8e15e9.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"老板为什么一定要重视企业合规：合规真正保护的是老板个人 - 人群分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 先问一个直接的问题：合规是给谁做的。多数老板的回答是给监管、给客户、给融资要求。这个回答决定了合规的位置：一份必须交、但不必真用的材料。等到出事，才发现当初做的那套东西，一样也用不上。另一种回答是给老板自己做的，听起来自私，却更接近制度设计的本意。公司一旦有了分支、团队和几个账户，决策就变成靠授权，资金就要过几个","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fpopularize\u002F989",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-24T10:42:27+08:00","2026-10-23T17:42:57+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F175b9911-dd5a-403f-aacc-0a627d74bd35.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fpopularize",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]