[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-1069":404},{"entity":4,"seo":356},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":200,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":300,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":332,"homeStats":333,"serviceProducts":346},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,122,129,134,140,147,152,156,161,166,171,176,180,187,195],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":119,"caseTypeName":120,"caseTypeCode":121},688,"X某涉嫌故意杀人罪、帮助毁灭证据罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获罪轻判决","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F0f36a3aa-35f3-48c4-97ea-9d54b41a553e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 结果： 被告人陈X犯帮助毁灭证据罪，判处 有期徒刑 两年十个月。 亮点： 成功区分主 从犯 地位，为从犯争取最低量刑； 构建完整证据链条，排除非法证据干扰； 量刑建议精准落地，实现罪责刑相适应。 焦点： 陈某某行为",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":123,"title":124,"thumbnail":125,"summary":126,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":127,"caseTypeCode":128},687,"Y某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师为其辩护，获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F32f405ba-83df-4123-8cc4-71e8bf5c2dcc.png","【案情简述】 2016年2月至 2019年11月间，Y某作为深圳市某传播有限公司总经理及实际控制人，在为某控股集团汽车销售有限公司(以下简称汽车销售公司)提供车展等服务时，为在招标、项目执行监管以及合同款的结算等过程中得到时任汽车销售公司展","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":127,"caseTypeCode":128},686,"T某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从受贿罪（量刑十年以上）辩护为非国家工作人员受贿罪（量刑五年以上）","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fb1d0699f-ad98-4416-a004-260a4f48ad3d.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非国家工作人员受贿罪（控方指控受贿罪） 结果：判处有期徒刑十年六个月（涉案金额529万元） 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从受贿罪（量刑十年以上）辩护为非国家工作人员受贿罪（量刑五年以上） 2. 通过主",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},685,"李某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获缓刑","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法吸收公众存款罪 结果：判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金人民币五万元。 亮点： 1. 成功推翻 公诉 机关关于当事人获取融资提成的指控，减少违法所得认定金额； 2. 通过 从犯 、自首、退赃等多","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":143,"summary":144,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},684,"刘某某涉嫌非法生产制毒物品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，二审成功减轻刑罚（改判没收已扣押款项6.2万元）","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F9ecad9fa-0873-4b29-a11e-ac76c7e1a65e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法生产制毒物品罪 结果：二审维持原判刑期（有期徒刑六年），但纠正追缴违法所得认定，改判没收已扣押款项6.2万元。 亮点： 成功论证XX犯罪事实系犯罪预备，依法减轻处罚； 通过退赃情节争取量刑从宽； ","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},683,"詹某涉嫌非法经营罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fc0006b70-6d78-4b88-a919-0f5dac64533c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法经营罪 结果： 法院采纳辩护意见，四名被告人均获从轻量刑， 主犯 李某某判处 有期徒刑 一年（基准刑以下减轻处罚） 亮点： 成功打掉\" 单位犯罪 \"指控，避免企业刑事责任牵连 通过司法审计锁定关键",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},682,"T某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案（37天）,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，取保候审","案情简介 2023年11月，嫌疑人T某于小红书上了解到涉案减肥药品牌，后开始在淘宝上售卖。同年11月，韩熙（网名）通过微信与T某沟通，称其有价格更为便宜的韩国药，T某便转而开始售卖该品牌减肥药，有买家要购买该药，T某便联系韩熙由其从沈阳发货",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},681,"X某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从犯认定减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F314078f1-0af3-4de4-807c-f3b9a4a9b2f9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贩卖毒品罪 结果：被告人被判处无期徒刑（涉案毒品数量特别巨大情况下获得法定刑以下减轻处罚） 亮点： 1. 在涉案甲基苯丙胺达08克的重大毒品案件中成功争取认定 2. 通过证据对抗排除部分毒品数量的归责",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":164,"summary":165,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},680,"X某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fe698a92e-a2e7-4b61-a8c7-0a0ad1fe1dd6.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贩卖毒品罪 结果：法院采纳部分辩护意见，认定犯罪未遂，判处有期徒刑九年六个月（法定刑期十年以上）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证侦查程序违法，排除关键言辞证据 2. 推翻\"贩卖目的\"指控，争取\" 非法持有毒",{"id":167,"title":168,"thumbnail":169,"summary":170,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证",{"id":172,"title":173,"thumbnail":174,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":10,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":185,"caseTypeCode":186},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":188,"title":189,"thumbnail":190,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":192,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":198,"summary":199,"caseTypeId":192,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",[201,204,207,210,213,218,221,227],{"id":38,"code":128,"name":127,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":186,"name":185,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":192,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":222,"code":223,"name":224,"summary":225,"keywords":226},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":119,"code":121,"name":120,"summary":228,"keywords":229},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},799,"2026-10-26 17:50:47",75,"文山市看守所","走私普通货物罪","2026年10月10日 石晨炜 走私普通货物罪——卓安（昆明）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F50e82abf-f9cd-4023-99d8-3020b6a99b42.png","2026-10-26 17:49:05","石晨炜",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fb0a368ce-5024-448d-9b3c-c3c66f14a084.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,276,288],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":253,"city":254,"caseType":255,"title":256,"thumbnail":257,"content":10,"publishTime":258,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":259,"lawyers":260},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[261],{"id":253,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":274,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":275,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":277,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":278,"city":279,"caseType":280,"title":281,"thumbnail":282,"content":10,"publishTime":283,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":284,"lawyers":285},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[286],{"id":278,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":287,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":289,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":290,"city":291,"caseType":292,"title":293,"thumbnail":294,"content":10,"publishTime":295,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":296,"lawyers":297},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[298],{"id":290,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":296,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":299,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",41,[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":192,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":222,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[334,337,340,343],{"value":335,"label":336},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":338,"label":339},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":341,"label":342},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":344,"label":345},"6","全国分所",[347,350,353],{"title":348,"desc":349},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":351,"desc":352},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":354,"desc":355},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":357,"description":13,"keywords":358,"canonical":359,"image":10,"jsonLd":360},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[361],{"@context":362,"@graph":363},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[364,370],{"@type":365,"@id":366,"url":359,"name":7,"inLanguage":367,"publisher":368},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":369},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":371,"@id":369,"name":7,"url":359,"logo":372,"image":372,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":367,"address":373,"geo":376,"department":378},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":375},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":377,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[379,384,388,392,396,400],{"@type":380,"@id":381,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":385,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":389,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":393,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":397,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":401,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":369},{"entity":405,"seo":416},{"id":406,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":408,"thumbnail":409,"content":410,"publishTime":411,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":412},1069,"2026-10-26 17:31:01","贪污罪争取缓刑：先把刑期压进三年，再排掉九类情形","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fa1a776c7-1a11-4b96-a822-776a43ffc20b.jpg","\u003Ch2>摘要\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>贪污罪的缓刑，先是一道算术题，然后才是态度题。三万元以上不满二十万元落在第一档，法定刑三年以下，缓刑的门是开着的；二十万元以上进第二档，法定刑三年起步，想判到三年这条线上，必须有能减轻处罚的情节，把刑期拉到法定刑以下。坦白和退赃在法律上只能从轻，不能自己把刑期降到三年以下，这个区别决定了家属的预期该定在哪里。刑期之外还有一道职务犯罪专有的筛子：两高《关于办理职务犯罪案件严格适用缓刑、免予刑事处罚若干问题的意见》第二条列了九种一般不适用缓刑的情形。同一份意见的第三条反而给了正面路径：不落九种情形、全部退缴赃款赃物、判三年以下、符合刑法第七十二条，可以适用缓刑。这篇把两道门、九类情形和几处实操短板逐一拆开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>一、缓刑的第一道门是刑期，不是态度\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>家属问到能不能缓刑，听到的回答常常是看态度好不好、退赃到不到位。这个顺序是反的。缓刑首先是刑期判断。《中华人民共和国刑法》第七十二条第一句就把范围划死了：对于被判处拘役、三年以下有期徒刑的犯罪分子。判到三年以上，态度再好也没有入口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）三档数额，决定有没有缓刑的资格\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>贪污罪的刑罚由数额和情节共同决定，三档数额是硬开关。《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第一条至第三条划了三条线：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>三万元以上不满二十万元，属数额较大，处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处罚金。一万元以上不满三万元，如果有贪污特定款物、曾因贪污受贿挪用公款受过党纪政务处分、曾因故意犯罪受过刑事追究、赃款赃物用于非法活动、拒不交代去向致使无法追缴、造成恶劣影响等情形，也按这一档处理。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>二十万元以上不满三百万元，属数额巨大，处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金或者没收财产。十万元以上不满二十万元，有上述情形的，按这一档处理。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>三百万元以上，属数额特别巨大，处十年以上有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑。一百五十万元以上不满三百万元，有上述情形的，按这一档处理。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>结论很直白：落在第一档，缓刑的门开着；落在第二、第三档，门是关着的，想进去得先找到钥匙。所有的争取工作，第一步都是确认数额到底落在哪一档，以及有没有可能被拉到下一档。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）二十万元以上想缓刑，必须找到能减轻处罚的情节\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>第二档的法定刑是三年起步。要在这一档里判到三年，法律上叫减轻处罚，是在法定刑以下判，不是从轻处罚。这两件事的分量差得很远。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>从轻，是在这一档的幅度内往下走，第二档的档底就是三年，走到头还是三年。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>减轻，是跨到下一档，才能出现三年以下的空间。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>能减轻的法定情节是有限的：自首、立功、从犯、犯罪未遂等，都是法定的减轻事由。其中自首最常被用到，《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十七条对此有明确规定。反过来，仅仅如实交代、仅仅退赃，都不是减轻情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三年以下有期徒刑包含三年本数。第二档压到极限，判三年本身就在缓刑范围内。判三缓四、判三缓五是把刑期顶到边界线上再争取缓刑，不是压到三年以下。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）坦白与退赃只能从轻，不必然把刑期降到三年以下\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这是家属预期最容易错位的地方。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>坦白。《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十七条第三款规定，如实供述自己罪行的，可以从轻处罚；因其如实供述自己罪行，避免特别严重后果发生的，可以减轻处罚。减轻的出口只有一个，条件很窄，不是交代得清楚就能减轻。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>退赃。《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十三条第三款把话说得很清楚：犯第一款罪，在提起公诉前如实供述自己罪行、真诚悔罪、积极退赃，避免、减少损害结果的发生，有第一项规定情形的，可以从轻、减轻或者免除处罚；有第二项、第三项规定情形的，可以从轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>也就是说，同样一笔退赃，在第一档是通行证，可以换来从轻、减轻乃至免除处罚；在第二档、第三档只是减分项，换到的只有从轻。这一款的适用还卡着一个时间点，限于提起公诉前。过了这个点再退，钱还是那笔钱，依据却从这一款的法定情节退成酌定情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>二、职务犯罪还有第二道门：九类情形\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>第一道门是所有犯罪共用的，第二道门只对职务犯罪开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）两高这份意见列了九种一般不适用缓刑的情形\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理职务犯罪案件严格适用缓刑、免予刑事处罚若干问题的意见》第二条列了九项：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>不如实供述罪行的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>不予退缴赃款赃物或者将赃款赃物用于非法活动的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>属于共同犯罪中情节严重的主犯的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>犯有数个职务犯罪依法实行并罚或者以一罪处理的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>曾因职务违纪违法行为受过行政处分的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>犯罪涉及的财物属于救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、扶贫、移民、救济、防疫等特定款物的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>受贿犯罪中具有索贿情节的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>渎职犯罪中具有徇私舞弊情节或者滥用职权情节恶劣的；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>其他不应适用缓刑、免予刑事处罚的情形。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>对贪污罪来说，第二项、第四项、第五项、第六项是四个常见关口。第四项要单独说明：只要两个以上职务犯罪并罚，就落入这一项，哪怕每个罪单看都不重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）九类情形不是一律禁止，但要走审判委员会\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这份意见第四条给了一条通道：具有第二条情形之一，法院认为确有必要适用缓刑或者免予刑事处罚的，应当报审判委员会讨论决定。所以是一般不适用，不是一律不适用。要突破得有超出常规的理由，决定权在审判委员会，不在合议庭。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同一份意见还划了一条更硬的线：情节恶劣、社会反映强烈的职务犯罪案件，不得适用缓刑、免予刑事处罚。这一条没有例外程序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>三、这份意见最有用的地方在第三条\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>多数文章只抄第二条的九项，把这份文件讲成一张禁止清单。真正有用的是第三条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（一）第三条给了一组可以适用缓刑的完整条件\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>第三条的结构是一个四要素叠加：不具有第二条规定的情形、全部退缴赃款赃物、依法判处三年有期徒刑以下刑罚、符合刑法规定的缓刑适用条件，同时成立的贪污、受贿犯罪分子，可以适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四个条件缺一不可。其中全部退缴赃款赃物这一项，性质要看清：它不是酌情情节，是缓刑的前置条件。只退一部分，或者退缴数额与最终认定数额对不上，第三个条件成立了，第二个条件仍然不成立。家属往往以为退一部分表达态度就够。实务落地时，退缴凭证、退还时间、数额是否覆盖全部指控，要一项一项对上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）第三条指向的条项，已经改过一次\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>第三条后半句是：符合刑法第三百八十三条第一款第（三）项的规定，依法不需要判处刑罚的，可以免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这一句现在照抄会出错。这份意见 2011 年发布、2012 年印发，所指的是刑法修正案（九）之前的第三百八十三条第一款第（三）项，当时针对个人贪污数额不满五千元的情形。2015 年 11 月 1 日修正案（九）施行后，第三百八十三条第一款改为按数额分三档，项号与内容都变了，原来的第（三）项已不存在。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>规则精神仍然有效，落到免予刑事处罚，现行依据是《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十七条，或者《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十三条第三款对第一档规定的免除处罚。引用时条项要按现行刑法重新对。这一处是网上文章错得较多的地方，读者拿现行刑法查原文会对不上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）免予刑事处罚在缓刑之前\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>家属通常只问缓刑，其实前面还有一格。《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十七条规定，对于犯罪情节轻微不需要判处刑罚的，可以免予刑事处罚。对贪污罪的第一档，刑法第三百八十三条第三款直接写了免除处罚这个选项。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>顺序是：免予刑事处罚、缓刑、实刑。如果没把免予刑事处罚放在前面评估过，缓刑就成了唯一目标，空间反而变窄。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>四、具体到贪污罪，能争的空间在这三处\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）核减数额，把档位压下来\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>数额是档位的开关，二十万元是三年这条线的界碑。核减的落点通常在四处：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>哪些财物属于公共财物，产权归属和移交程序是否清楚；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>票据、账目与资金流向能不能逐笔对应，有没有孤证；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>共同犯罪中本人实际占有、支配多少，还是只经手；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>有没有把不属贪污的部分计入，例如正常报销、单位内部往来款。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>有一处常见误解要澄清。按两高贪污贿赂解释第十六条，赃款赃物用于单位公务支出或者社会捐赠的，不影响贪污罪认定，但量刑时可以酌情考虑。意思是用于公务不能从数额里扣掉，只能作为量刑酌定情节。不少家属以为钱花在单位就不算贪污，与条文相反。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）逐条排查九类情形\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>排查不能靠印象，要靠一张表，逐项写有或无、依据是什么。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>不如实供述：判断标准是有没有如实供述，不是供述了多少。翻供、只认一部分、把责任全推给下属，都可能落在这一项。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>不予退缴：与第三条的全部退缴要求是同一件事的两面。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>数个职务犯罪并罚：贪污与受贿并罚最常见，一旦并罚即落入这一项。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>曾受行政处分：看的是案发前有没有因职务违纪违法受过行政处分，一次记过也可能落在里面。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>特定款物：扶贫、救济、防疫这类款项，一分钱也算。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师，前检察官，在检察机关从事审查逮捕与审查起诉工作十年，团队办理这类案件时把九项做成一张表，逐项标注有或无，附上卷内依据。这张表比辩护意见里的形容词有用，因为它直接对应办案机关的判断顺序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）社区矫正评估与财产刑，是两块容易被忽略的短板\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第七十二条第四项要求宣告缓刑对所居住社区没有重大不良影响。实务中法院会委托社区矫正机构做调查评估，看的是居住地是否明确、家庭关系是否稳定、一贯表现、社区是否愿意接收。户籍地与实际居住地不一致、长期在外、没有固定住所，都会让这一项打问号。这件事在开庭前就要准备，不是判了再补。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>财产刑是另一块。两高贪污贿赂解释第十九条规定，判处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役的，应当并处十万元以上五十万元以下的罚金；判三年以上十年以下的，并处二十万元以上、犯罪数额二倍以下的罚金。而《中华人民共和国刑法》第七十二条第三款明确，被宣告缓刑的犯罪分子，如果被判处附加刑，附加刑仍须执行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以缓刑不是不罚，是把自由刑放到社区执行，罚金照缴。罚金长期缴不上，会被认为悔罪不彻底，反过来影响缓刑判断。这笔钱要在判决前算清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>五、三个案例\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）贪污九十八万余元，判三缓五\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所何春莉律师办理的一起贪污案。当事人在某建设集团分公司市场开发部任副部长，负责招标文件采购，通过篡改招标公告中的文件费用标准、伪造收款收据，虚构招标文件购买费用九十八万余元，报销后用于个人开支。单位内部核查时，当事人主动交代了全部事实，刑事立案前已全额退还。辩护人先争自首，起诉书予以认定；再争取不起诉，因数额较大未获同意；检察机关提出认罪认罚并建议适用缓刑。一审以简易程序审理，判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑五年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个案子的关节在刑期。九十八万元属第二档，法定刑三年以上。缓刑的入口是自首带来的减轻处罚，把刑期压到三年这条线上。自首与全额退还同时到位，才有判三缓五。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）贪污一千五百八十一万余元，判三缓四\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所吕灵兮律师办理的一起贪污案。当事人系某公司董事长，在国有企业破产清算期间，伙同清算组人员未经批准和拍卖程序，将原厂宿舍、食堂、医院等四十二处非生产经营性资产转移至其控制的公司并办理过户登记，评估价值一千五百八十一万余元。辩护从三处入手：一是定性，主张行为更符合私分国有资产罪的特征，且已过追诉时效；二是数额，指出评估报告对非经营性资产的范围界定不清、存在矛盾；三是从宽情节，主张自首、从犯、积极退赃。法院采纳部分意见，以贪污罪判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金一百万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个案子能走到缓刑，靠的不是数额，是从犯与自首叠加后的大幅减轻。单看一千五百万元，属第三档，法定刑十年以上。数额之外的定性争议、地位作用、退赃情况，是另外三条路。它不是常态，但说明数额并非唯一变量。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）贪污并受贿，数罪并罚四年六个月\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所何冰冰、汪余财律师办理的一起案件。当事人原任某区多个部门负责人，被指控贪污二十二万九千余元、受贿七十二万五千余元。辩护围绕三项展开：贪污部分逐笔核查资金流向，指出其中一笔仅有证人单方陈述、无财务凭证印证；受贿部分主张部分款项属及时退还；同时论证经电话通知到案后如实供述，构成自首。法院采纳自首与退缴意见，以贪污罪判处有期徒刑二年，受贿罪判处有期徒刑三年六个月，数罪并罚执行四年六个月。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个案子是第二道门最直观的说明。单看贪污罪二年，已经在缓刑区间内；但两个职务犯罪并罚，落入两高意见第二条第四项，一般不适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>六、涉及的法律依据\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Col>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十三条　贪污罪三档量刑，以及提起公诉前如实供述、真诚悔罪、积极退赃的从宽规定\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第七十二条　缓刑的适用条件，含附加刑仍须执行\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十七条　自首的成立与处罚，以及坦白从轻、减轻的区分\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十七条　犯罪情节轻微不需要判处刑罚的，可以免予刑事处罚\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第一条　三万元以上不满二十万元的数额较大认定，及一万元以上不满三万元的较重情节\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同解释第二条　二十万元以上不满三百万元的数额巨大认定，及十万元以上不满二十万元的严重情节\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同解释第三条　三百万元以上的数额特别巨大认定，及一百五十万元以上不满三百万元的特别严重情节\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同解释第十六条　赃款赃物用于单位公务支出或社会捐赠，不影响定罪，量刑时酌情考虑\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同解释第十九条　三年以下并处十万元以上五十万元以下罚金等财产刑幅度\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理职务犯罪案件严格适用缓刑、免予刑事处罚若干问题的意见》第二条、第三条、第四条　九类一般不适用缓刑的情形、可以适用缓刑的四项条件、审判委员会讨论程序\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch2>结语\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>贪污罪的缓刑从来不是一句态度评价，是一串条件的叠加：刑期先进三年以内，九类情形逐条排除，赃款全部退缴，社区评估过关，罚金落实。任何一环不成立，前面几环都白做。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断一个案子有没有缓刑空间，顺序应当是：先算数额落在哪一档，再看有没有能减轻处罚的情节，最后才谈态度和退赃。把顺序倒过来，家属的预期就会从一开始定错。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所　吴亮\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-26 17:28:15",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":413,"name":414,"icon":415,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":417,"description":418,"keywords":32,"canonical":419,"image":409,"jsonLd":420},"贪污罪争取缓刑：先把刑期压进三年，再排掉九类情形 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 贪污罪的缓刑，先是一道算术题，然后才是态度题。三万元以上不满二十万元落在第一档，法定刑三年以下，缓刑的门是开着的；二十万元以上进第二档，法定刑三年起步，想判到三年这条线上，必须有能减轻处罚的情节，把刑期拉到法定刑以下。坦白和退赃在法律上只能从轻，不能自己把刑期降到三年以下，这个区别决定了家属的预期该定在哪里。刑期","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F1069",[421],{"@context":362,"@graph":422},[423,430],{"@type":424,"@id":419,"url":419,"headline":408,"description":418,"datePublished":425,"dateModified":426,"author":427,"publisher":428,"articleSection":414,"inLanguage":367,"image":429},"Article","2026-10-26T17:28:15+08:00","2026-10-26T17:31:01+08:00",{"@id":369},{"@id":369},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fa1a776c7-1a11-4b96-a822-776a43ffc20b.jpg",{"@type":431,"itemListElement":432},"BreadcrumbList",[433,436,438],{"@type":434,"position":6,"name":435,"item":359},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":434,"position":38,"name":414,"item":437},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":434,"position":35,"name":408,"item":419}]