[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-1072":404},{"entity":4,"seo":356},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":200,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":300,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":332,"homeStats":333,"serviceProducts":346},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,122,129,134,140,147,152,156,161,166,171,176,180,187,195],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":119,"caseTypeName":120,"caseTypeCode":121},688,"X某涉嫌故意杀人罪、帮助毁灭证据罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获罪轻判决","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F0f36a3aa-35f3-48c4-97ea-9d54b41a553e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 结果： 被告人陈X犯帮助毁灭证据罪，判处 有期徒刑 两年十个月。 亮点： 成功区分主 从犯 地位，为从犯争取最低量刑； 构建完整证据链条，排除非法证据干扰； 量刑建议精准落地，实现罪责刑相适应。 焦点： 陈某某行为",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":123,"title":124,"thumbnail":125,"summary":126,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":127,"caseTypeCode":128},687,"Y某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师为其辩护，获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F32f405ba-83df-4123-8cc4-71e8bf5c2dcc.png","【案情简述】 2016年2月至 2019年11月间，Y某作为深圳市某传播有限公司总经理及实际控制人，在为某控股集团汽车销售有限公司(以下简称汽车销售公司)提供车展等服务时，为在招标、项目执行监管以及合同款的结算等过程中得到时任汽车销售公司展","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":127,"caseTypeCode":128},686,"T某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从受贿罪（量刑十年以上）辩护为非国家工作人员受贿罪（量刑五年以上）","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fb1d0699f-ad98-4416-a004-260a4f48ad3d.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非国家工作人员受贿罪（控方指控受贿罪） 结果：判处有期徒刑十年六个月（涉案金额529万元） 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从受贿罪（量刑十年以上）辩护为非国家工作人员受贿罪（量刑五年以上） 2. 通过主",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},685,"李某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获缓刑","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法吸收公众存款罪 结果：判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金人民币五万元。 亮点： 1. 成功推翻 公诉 机关关于当事人获取融资提成的指控，减少违法所得认定金额； 2. 通过 从犯 、自首、退赃等多","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":143,"summary":144,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},684,"刘某某涉嫌非法生产制毒物品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，二审成功减轻刑罚（改判没收已扣押款项6.2万元）","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F9ecad9fa-0873-4b29-a11e-ac76c7e1a65e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法生产制毒物品罪 结果：二审维持原判刑期（有期徒刑六年），但纠正追缴违法所得认定，改判没收已扣押款项6.2万元。 亮点： 成功论证XX犯罪事实系犯罪预备，依法减轻处罚； 通过退赃情节争取量刑从宽； ","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},683,"詹某涉嫌非法经营罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fc0006b70-6d78-4b88-a919-0f5dac64533c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法经营罪 结果： 法院采纳辩护意见，四名被告人均获从轻量刑， 主犯 李某某判处 有期徒刑 一年（基准刑以下减轻处罚） 亮点： 成功打掉\" 单位犯罪 \"指控，避免企业刑事责任牵连 通过司法审计锁定关键",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},682,"T某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案（37天）,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，取保候审","案情简介 2023年11月，嫌疑人T某于小红书上了解到涉案减肥药品牌，后开始在淘宝上售卖。同年11月，韩熙（网名）通过微信与T某沟通，称其有价格更为便宜的韩国药，T某便转而开始售卖该品牌减肥药，有买家要购买该药，T某便联系韩熙由其从沈阳发货",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},681,"X某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从犯认定减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F314078f1-0af3-4de4-807c-f3b9a4a9b2f9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贩卖毒品罪 结果：被告人被判处无期徒刑（涉案毒品数量特别巨大情况下获得法定刑以下减轻处罚） 亮点： 1. 在涉案甲基苯丙胺达08克的重大毒品案件中成功争取认定 2. 通过证据对抗排除部分毒品数量的归责",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":164,"summary":165,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},680,"X某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fe698a92e-a2e7-4b61-a8c7-0a0ad1fe1dd6.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贩卖毒品罪 结果：法院采纳部分辩护意见，认定犯罪未遂，判处有期徒刑九年六个月（法定刑期十年以上）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证侦查程序违法，排除关键言辞证据 2. 推翻\"贩卖目的\"指控，争取\" 非法持有毒",{"id":167,"title":168,"thumbnail":169,"summary":170,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证",{"id":172,"title":173,"thumbnail":174,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":10,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":185,"caseTypeCode":186},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":188,"title":189,"thumbnail":190,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":192,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":198,"summary":199,"caseTypeId":192,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",[201,204,207,210,213,218,221,227],{"id":38,"code":128,"name":127,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":186,"name":185,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":192,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":222,"code":223,"name":224,"summary":225,"keywords":226},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":119,"code":121,"name":120,"summary":228,"keywords":229},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},799,"2026-10-26 17:50:47",75,"文山市看守所","走私普通货物罪","2026年10月10日 石晨炜 走私普通货物罪——卓安（昆明）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F50e82abf-f9cd-4023-99d8-3020b6a99b42.png","2026-10-26 17:49:05","石晨炜",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fb0a368ce-5024-448d-9b3c-c3c66f14a084.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,276,288],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":253,"city":254,"caseType":255,"title":256,"thumbnail":257,"content":10,"publishTime":258,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":259,"lawyers":260},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[261],{"id":253,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":274,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":275,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":277,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":278,"city":279,"caseType":280,"title":281,"thumbnail":282,"content":10,"publishTime":283,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":284,"lawyers":285},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[286],{"id":278,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":287,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":289,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":290,"city":291,"caseType":292,"title":293,"thumbnail":294,"content":10,"publishTime":295,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":296,"lawyers":297},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[298],{"id":290,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":296,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":299,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",41,[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":192,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":222,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[334,337,340,343],{"value":335,"label":336},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":338,"label":339},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":341,"label":342},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":344,"label":345},"6","全国分所",[347,350,353],{"title":348,"desc":349},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":351,"desc":352},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":354,"desc":355},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":357,"description":13,"keywords":358,"canonical":359,"image":10,"jsonLd":360},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[361],{"@context":362,"@graph":363},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[364,370],{"@type":365,"@id":366,"url":359,"name":7,"inLanguage":367,"publisher":368},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":369},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":371,"@id":369,"name":7,"url":359,"logo":372,"image":372,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":367,"address":373,"geo":376,"department":378},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":375},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":377,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[379,384,388,392,396,400],{"@type":380,"@id":381,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":385,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":389,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":393,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":397,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":401,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":369},{"entity":405,"seo":416},{"id":406,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":408,"thumbnail":409,"content":410,"publishTime":411,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":412},1072,"2026-10-26 17:40:10","涉黑涉恶取保候审到底多难？4点讲清","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F047b38ed-66a4-4248-a47b-ba561e13806f.jpg","\u003Cp>涉黑涉恶案件能否取保候审，不能一概而论，核心取决于犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在组织中的地位、参与程度、认罪悔罪态度及人身危险性等具体情形，而非所谓“关系”或“门路”。《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二十二条明确，对组织者、领导者和骨干成员应当严格掌握取保候审等非羁押强制措施的适用条件；《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》第三十四条进一步规定，对上述人员决定取保候审须经办案公安机关主要负责人组织集体讨论。据此，组织核心成员取保空间极小，而身份边缘、参与程度低、认罪认罚且社会危险性小的普通参加者，在符合法定条件时仍存在变更强制措施的可能。本文从法律依据、四项审查要点、常见误区与家属指引四个层面作出说明，供家属理性判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、结论先行：取保难在“身份”，不在“关系”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>首先需要澄清一个前提：《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》并未规定涉黑涉恶案件绝对不得取保候审，法律上不存在“一刀切”的禁止。但必须如实说明，在刑事辩护实务中，涉黑涉恶案件的取保候审确属难度最高的类型之一。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>难度集中体现在《反有组织犯罪法》第二十二条。该条明确规定，办理有组织犯罪案件应当坚持宽严相济，对有组织犯罪的组织者、领导者和骨干成员，“应当严格掌握取保候审、不起诉、缓刑、减刑、假释和暂予监外执行的适用条件”。这意味着，一旦被认定为上述三类人员，取保候审的适用空间极为有限，实务中亦趋于审慎。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>更进一步，程序要求更为严格。根据《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》第三十四条，对上述三类人员决定取保候审的，须由办案的公安机关主要负责人组织集体讨论决定，而非办案民警个人可以批准。这也是此类案件取保难度高于一般刑事案件的制度原因。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>因此，判断“有没有空间”，关键在犯罪嫌疑人、被告人本人在案件中的地位与作用，而非外部因素。下文以四项要点展开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、实务标准：审查取保候审的四项要点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（一）法律依据：认定取保条件的现行规范\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第六十七条：规定取保候审的一般适用条件，包括可能判处管制、拘役或独立适用附加刑，可能判处有期徒刑以上刑罚但采取取保不致发生社会危险性，以及羁押期限届满案件尚未办结等情形；该条并未对涉黑涉恶案件作绝对排除。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二十二条（2022年5月1日施行）：对组织者、领导者和骨干成员严格掌握取保候审等非羁押措施的适用条件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》（公安部令第165号）第三十四条：对上述三类人员取保候审，由办案公安机关主要负责人组织集体讨论决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》第四十二条：对罪行较轻、自愿认罪认罚、采用非羁押性强制措施足以防止发生社会危险性的犯罪嫌疑人，可依法不适用羁押性强制措施；已被羁押的，可依法变更强制措施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（二）标准一：审查在组织中的地位与层级\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>身份是决定取保空间的首要因素。根据《反有组织犯罪法》第二十二条及司法实践，对组织者、领导者、骨干成员从严掌握，通常不具备取保条件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要明确的是，第22条“严格掌握”的对象是组织者、领导者和骨干成员，而非“积极参加者”的全部。 根据《办理黑社会性质组织犯罪案件座谈会纪要》及实务通说，“骨干成员”是“积极参加者”中直接听命于组织者、领导者、作用更为突出的部分；在骨干成员之外，还存在其他积极参加者，其并不当然落入第22条的严格掌握范围。因此，对于黑社会性质组织中不属于骨干成员的积极参加者及一般参加者，以及恶势力组织中的边缘成员，其取保审查应回到《刑事诉讼法》第67条的一般条件，结合参与程度、具体行为、社会危险性等因素独立判断，在从严中体现区别对待。尤其是被指控为一般参加者的人员，首先须查明其是否确属组织成员；若参与程度轻微、在组织中没有职务与层级，则其强制措施审查应与核心成员区分处理。简言之，身份越边缘，取保可能性相对越高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（三）标准二：审查参与程度与具体行为\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在地位相近的情形下，参与程度是第二项审查要点。通常考量：是否仅参与单次违法犯罪活动，是否为主要实行者，在组织所犯具体罪行中发挥作用大小。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等常见个罪为例，若当事人仅因偶发冲突被动卷入、未参与组织惯常的违法犯罪、在共同犯罪中起次要作用，则该笔行为能否纳入“组织犯罪”范畴本身即存在辩护空间，进而影响其社会危险性与强制措施的判断。参与程度越低、与组织惯常行为关联越弱，越有利于非羁押性强制措施的适用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（四）标准三：审查认罪悔罪与退赃态度\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>认罪悔罪与退赃退赔，是判断社会危险性与再犯可能的重要情节。《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》第四十二条将从宽适用于“罪行较轻、自愿认罪认罚、采用非羁押性强制措施足以防止发生社会危险性”的情形，与此直接相关。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务中，主动认罪认罚、积极配合调查、积极退缴违法所得及孳息，能够降低办案机关对“毁灭证据、干扰作证、串供”等社会危险性的评估，从而增加变更强制措施的可能。反之，拒不认罪、对抗调查或隐匿财产的，取保空间相应收窄。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（五）标准四：审查社会危险性与保证条件\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>取保候审的本质前提，是“采取取保不致发生社会危险性”。《刑事诉讼法》第八十一条所列举的社会危险性情形，反向构成取保审查的对应标准，包括可能实施新犯罪、有危害公共安全或社会秩序的现实危险、可能毁灭伪造证据或串供、可能对被害人或控告人打击报复、企图自杀或逃跑等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>据此，当事人须具备可执行的保证条件——提供符合条件的保证人，或交纳保证金，并能够做到随传随到、不干扰诉讼。若经审查认为不存在串供、毁灭证据或逃跑风险，且保证条件到位，则具备适用非羁押强制措施的基础。若仍存在上述风险，则难以变更。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（六）误区澄清\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区一：“找关系才能取保。” 法律明确保证条件是法定情形与保证方式，决定权在办案机关依集体讨论程序作出。将取保寄托于外部关系，既不符合制度设计，也蕴含法律风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区二：“能取保就等于没事。” 取保候审是强制措施的一种，不等于终止追诉，也不意味着无罪。被取保人仍须接受侦查、起诉与审判，最终是否定罪、判处何种刑罚，取决于案件事实与证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区三：“取保后一定判缓刑。” 取保与缓刑是两项不同制度，前者审查社会危险性，后者审查量刑情节，二者无必然对应关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（七）小结\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑涉恶案件取保之难，难在组织者、领导者、骨干成员的法定的从严掌握与集体讨论程序；而边缘身份、低参与程度、认罪认罚且社会危险性小的普通参加者，在具备保证条件时仍存在变更强制措施的空间。家属应聚焦“地位、参与、态度、危险性”四项要点的证据梳理，而非寻求法外路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、给家属的建议\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1. 第一时间通过正规律所委托刑事辩护律师。 涉黑涉恶案件定性争点多，律师越早介入，越能在侦查阶段就强制措施问题提出有理据的律师意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2. 如实向律师说明当事人在组织中的实际地位与参与情况。 不夸大、不隐瞒，便于律师准确判断取保可能性与辩护路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3. 积极准备退赃与认罪悔罪相关材料。 主动退缴违法所得、配合调查，是降低社会危险性评估、争取非羁押措施的重要情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>4. 按要求落实保证条件。 提前了解保证人资格要求或保证金缴纳流程，确保随传随到、不干扰诉讼。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>5. 家属切勿自行“捞人”、串供、毁灭证据或转移财产。 此类行为可能使自身陷入包庇、毁灭证据等刑事风险，反而加重案件复杂性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>6. 对“包取保”“有关系就能放人”等说法保持高度警惕。 任何以结果承诺招揽业务的表述均不符合法律服务规范，应坚持以法定条件与办案程序为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、法律依据（汇总）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第六十七条（取保候审一般条件）、第八十一条（逮捕与社会危险性）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二十二条（2022年5月1日施行，对组织者、领导者、骨干成员严格掌握非羁押措施适用条件）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》（公安部令第165号）第三十四条（对上述三类人员取保候审由办案公安机关主要负责人组织集体讨论决定）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》第四十二条（认罪认罚、非羁押足以防社会危险性的可不适用或变更强制措施）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第七十一条（被取保人义务与监督）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》（2019年4月9日印发）相关程序规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    《中华人民共和国律师法》及相关律师执业规范（委托、保密与利益冲突审查）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>免责声明\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文为一般法律信息及律师业务推广信息，不构成对具体案件的法律意见，亦不构成对任何律师或机构的推荐，不构成办案结果承诺。律师执业信息以司法行政机关、律师协会、律所公示及双方委托合同为准；个案情况不同，请以有权机关认定为准。\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-26 17:42:51",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":413,"name":414,"icon":415,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":417,"description":418,"keywords":32,"canonical":419,"image":409,"jsonLd":420},"涉黑涉恶取保候审到底多难？4点讲清 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","涉黑涉恶案件能否取保候审，不能一概而论，核心取决于犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在组织中的地位、参与程度、认罪悔罪态度及人身危险性等具体情形，而非所谓“关系”或“门路”。《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二十二条明确，对组织者、领导者和骨干成员应当严格掌握取保候审等非羁押强制措施的适用条件；《公安机关反有组织犯罪工作规定》第三十四","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F1072",[421],{"@context":362,"@graph":422},[423,430],{"@type":424,"@id":419,"url":419,"headline":408,"description":418,"datePublished":425,"dateModified":426,"author":427,"publisher":428,"articleSection":414,"inLanguage":367,"image":429},"Article","2026-10-26T17:42:51+08:00","2026-10-26T17:40:10+08:00",{"@id":369},{"@id":369},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F047b38ed-66a4-4248-a47b-ba561e13806f.jpg",{"@type":431,"itemListElement":432},"BreadcrumbList",[433,436,438],{"@type":434,"position":6,"name":435,"item":359},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":434,"position":38,"name":414,"item":437},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":434,"position":35,"name":408,"item":419}]