[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-1104":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":195,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":298,"serviceTags":299,"serviceCategories":300,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,126,131,136,141,146,153,158,165,173,177,181,185,190],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},709,"Z某涉嫌高利转贷等罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其无罪辩护，法院宣判无罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F0a7baa15-a6ee-41ca-ae2b-d86edffbb0a7.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人在明知出借人是从银行贷款出来的钱后，仍然介绍借款人给出借人，金额高达上百万，构成高利转贷罪。 二、办案过程与结果 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，梳理卷宗，最终通过开庭时的据理力争，成功打掉该罪名，法院宣判无","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},708,"Y某卖烟涉嫌非法经营罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fdd174c24-5332-4bf7-a617-b2cd89db9554.png","一、案例罪名： 非法经营罪 二、案情简介： 办案机关指控当事人无证卖烟，500多条烟全被没收，涉案价值十万元左右。 三、办案过程： 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时",{"id":127,"title":128,"thumbnail":129,"summary":130,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},707,"D某卖烟股东涉嫌非法经营罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在逮捕后成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F7c1c2115-8db9-4ccf-a3c5-5b598e85e2ef.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人作为股东和实际经营者的身份，参与两个店铺私下售卖香烟的活动，经营数额达到近40万，并且在同案家中还搜出大量香烟存货。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续，客观公正地分",{"id":132,"title":133,"thumbnail":134,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},706,"Y某卖烟老板涉嫌非法经营罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fc4b12d35-80b7-4a81-8a80-c58a67c6a1c0.png","一、案情简介 当事人无烟草专卖零售许可证，找司机运输300多条烟想要拿来再卖时，运输途中被办案机关挡获，顺着司机笔录、派单信息、收货信息，侦查机关直接异地上门抓捕当事人。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":139,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},705,"W某卖电子烟涉嫌非法经营罪、销售伪劣产品罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fc1d3f8ce-0cc5-48f1-b5f4-32737ad4fcca.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人在2022年10月之后仍在售卖水果味电子烟，现场进行抓捕并查获店内库存，刚开始以立案，但后面由于律师提出当事人具备烟草专卖零售许可证，上面明确写明当事人有电子烟零售资格，故侦查机关改为以销售伪劣产品罪指控。 ",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},704,"H某涉嫌房地产业诈骗罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fd95de080-9070-48ad-b94c-ecc4de442609.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人作为房地产咨询公司的法人，明知并且帮助公司对客户进行诈骗，数额特别巨大，情节严重。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},703,"L某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F884d8a69-4b7d-46f6-afce-990c9062826b.png","一、案情简介 L某因出售大麻给好友，以涉嫌 贩卖毒品罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，当事人将如何到案以及每一次给好友大麻的详细过程讲述给律师，律师在其中找到相应辩点，并依据《全国法院毒品案件审判工作会议纪要》","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},702,"W某涉嫌贩卖毒品案，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其开庭辩护，争取到比量刑建议更低的刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F3b51bd8d-cfad-4548-8234-80e435979513.png","一、案例罪名： 贩卖毒品罪 二、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人贩卖1克左右的冰毒。 三、开庭过程 签了认罪认罚后，庭上再出现新情节，检察院先不认可，提交了相应证据后虽然认可了，但坚持不愿意再下调量刑建议。 家属和当事人紧张得不得了，我还是比较",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":163,"caseTypeCode":164},701,"L某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿罪530余万，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，法院未判该罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F2db72e2b-5ffe-48ee-9741-c25d3b8f80e0.png","检察院指控两罪：虚开增值税专用发票罪，税额6998余万；对非国家工作人员，530余万。 隔了半年后开二庭，检察院坚持不变更起诉，我和当事人仍然坚持做对非公行贿罪无罪，虚开罪辩逃税罪的辩护。 休庭后经审判委员会讨论决定，最终法院仅判决虚开一项","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},700,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，法院采纳辩护意见，对部分指控事实不予认定，量刑较同案主犯减轻30%","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe0d0c90e-5703-44a7-bf9e-ba1f77bc340a.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：开设赌场罪 结果：法院采纳辩护意见，对部分指控事实不予认定，量刑较同案减轻30% 亮点： 1. 成功推翻2022年12月23日前的涉案金额指控（减少认定违法所得14.7万元） 2. 通过证据对抗实现 ",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},699,"XX涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获降低量刑至最低刑期","罪名 ：开设赌场罪 结果 ：一审判决 有期徒刑 一年（检察机关量刑建议一年）， 罚金 人民币三千元 亮点 ：成功降低量刑幅度至法定最低刑（基准刑五年以下，实际判处一年） 通过证据审查否定\"股东身份\"\"管理职责\"等加重情节指控 自首情节精准认",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":10,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},698,"W某涉嫌熊猫麻将开设赌场罪，在检察院量刑实刑情况下，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护获轻判缓刑","律师工作： 1.拿到案卷之后先阅卷，发现案件突破点：主犯、犯罪金额 2.立马写好法律意见，跟法院、检察院当面沟通法律意见，表达律师诉求 3.对当事人进行全面辅导，证据分析，阐述律师的辩护方案，并对当事人进行庭前辅导 4.搜集当事人罪轻证据，",{"id":182,"title":183,"thumbnail":10,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},697,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名从轻处罚","一、【案情简述】 被告等人以营利为目的，组建聊天群组，通过“熊猫麻将”“悦穆”等手机软件组织他人赌博并抽头渔利，被告等人明知他人 开设赌场 而为其提供财务管理、抽头渔利、赌资结算等帮助，经法院认定为构成 开设赌场罪 。 二、【辩护思路】 经",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":188,"summary":189,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},696,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，在法定刑框架内为当事人争取最优结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fcd0d4300-bc88-4251-a9ff-f95f54f3de33.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：开设赌场罪 结果：法院采纳从犯认定、认罪认罚等辩护意见，在公诉机关建议刑期（五年）基础上未加重处罚，并判处罚金二万元。 亮点： 1. 通过精细化数据比对（占股比例、投注金额、分红金额等），成功论证当事",{"id":191,"title":192,"thumbnail":193,"summary":194,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},695,"H某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fccfbf910-e1fb-4252-baf9-2c8cf90dea2a.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：开设赌场罪 结果：有期徒刑6年6个月（较指控刑期降低40%），罚金60万元 亮点： 成功否定\"犯罪集团首要分子\"的加重情节认定 通过司法会计鉴定质证核减涉案金额近亿元 跨境电子证据合法性辩护获法庭采纳",[196,199,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":164,"name":163,"summary":197,"keywords":198},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":200,"name":201,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":152,"name":151,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":170,"code":172,"name":171,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,286],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":236,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[284],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":282,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":285,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":287,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":288,"city":289,"caseType":290,"title":291,"thumbnail":292,"content":10,"publishTime":293,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":294,"lawyers":295},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[296],{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":294,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":297,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[301,306,311,316,321,326],{"id":40,"createdAt":302,"updatedAt":303,"deleted":31,"code":304,"name":305,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":307,"deleted":31,"code":308,"name":309,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":310,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":312,"deleted":31,"code":313,"name":314,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":315,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":320,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":170,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":327,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},1104,"2026-10-27 17:20:32","商人老板涉案被调查：解除留置与移送起诉之间隔着四道判断","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F7cedcc3e-3266-43d6-995e-4f11c4e68554.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">摘要\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">企业负责人被留置，家属最先问的是什么时候能出来。这个问题的答案不在态度好坏，在三个地方：措施选在哪一档、期限走到哪一步、案子最终从哪个出口出去。立案不等于留置，留置也不等于移送。2024 年修正、2025 年 6 月 1 日施行的监察法在留置之外新增了责令候查，最长十二个月，把中间档补上了；同时明确留置措施不当或者不需要继续留置的，应当及时解除或者变更为责令候查，被留置人及其近亲属还取得了申请变更的权利，监察机关要在三日内答复。调查终结后共有五种处置方式，只有其中一种是把案子移送检察院。企业负责人的身份还要分两类：国有企业管理人员属于监察对象，民营老板被留置的依据是涉嫌行贿或者共同职务犯罪。这篇把这三道分界线和五类出口逐一拆开。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">一、留置不是立案的必然结果，措施本身有五档\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">立案是启动调查，留置是限制人身自由，这是两件事。监察法给的调查措施是逐级加重的，人在哪一档，决定了他现在处在什么处境。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（一）从谈话函询到留置，强度是递进的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">谈话、函询。针对可能发生职务违法的监察对象，要求说明情况。人不在办案机关控制之下。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">强制到案。按《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十一条，对涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪的被调查人，经审批可以强制到案；持续不超过十二小时，需采取管护或留置的不超过二十四小时，且不得连续强制到案变相拘禁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">责令候查。人在社会上，但要遵守五项义务，人身自由部分受限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 4. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">管护。按《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十五条，对未被留置但存在逃跑、自杀等重大安全风险的人员采取保护性约束，二十四小时内送留置场所。用意是防风险，不是惩罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 5. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">留置。在特定场所接受调查，人身自由被完全限制。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">每一档都有对应的适用条件，不能跳档乱用。家属听到的是谈话、是通知到案、还是已经留置，三个信息对应三种处境，第一步要确认的正是这一件事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（二）责令候查是 2024 年修正新增的中间档\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这是本轮修正最有实际意义的一处。按现行《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十三条，被调查人涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪，有下列四种情形之一，经审批可以采取责令候查措施：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">不具有留置条件的；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">符合留置条件，但患有严重疾病、生活不能自理，系怀孕或者正在哺乳自己婴儿的妇女，或者生活不能自理的人的唯一扶养人；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">案件尚未办结，但留置期限届满，或者对被留置人员不需要继续采取留置措施的；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 4. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">符合留置条件，但因为案件的特殊情况或者办理案件的需要，采取责令候查措施更为适宜的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">第四项对企业家尤其关键。同一轮修正还在总则部分增加了一条：监察机关应当依法保护企业产权和自主经营权，严禁利用职权非法干扰企业生产经营；需要企业经营者协助调查的，应当保障其人身权利、财产权利和其他合法权益，避免或者尽量减少对企业正常生产经营活动的影响。这两处合起来，构成了企业负责人留在社会上配合调查的法律依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">代价要说清楚。责令候查不是自由，是五项义务：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">未经批准不得离开所居住的直辖市、设区的市的城市市区，或者不设区的市、县的辖区；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">住址、工作单位和联系方式发生变动，二十四小时内向监察机关报告；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">接到通知时及时到案接受调查；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 4. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">不得以任何形式干扰证人作证；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 5. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">不得串供或者伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">违反上述规定且情节严重的，可以依法予以留置。《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十六条规定，责令候查最长不超过十二个月。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（三）近亲属可以申请变更，监察机关三日内必须答复\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十条第二款给了一项可以被家属直接使用的权利：被管护人员、被留置人员及其近亲属有权申请变更管护、留置措施。监察机关收到申请后，应当在三日以内作出决定；不同意变更的，应当告知申请人并说明不同意的理由。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这项权利的边界要讲明白。申请不等于必然变更，决定权在监察机关。但三日内必须答复、不同意必须说明理由，意味着这份申请不能不被处理。能否被采纳，取决于案情、证据状况和有没有妨碍调查的风险，不取决于申请写得多动情。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">第五十条第一款还有一句常被忽略：解除管护或者留置的，应当及时通知被管护人员、被留置人员所在单位和家属。所以解除这个动作本身，办案机关有通知义务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">二、同样被留置，继续与解除的分界不在金额\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（一）不需要继续留置是法定义务，不是照顾\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十八条第一款后段写得很硬：监察机关发现采取留置措施不当或者不需要继续采取留置措施的，应当及时解除或者变更为责令候查措施。用的是应当，不是可以。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">留置期限是三个月，特殊情况下可以延长一次，延长时间不超过三个月；涉嫌职务犯罪可能判处十年有期徒刑以上刑罚、延长期限届满仍不能调查终结的，经国家监察委员会批准或者决定，可以再延长二个月。这就是通常说的三加三加二。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">期限届满只有两条路：解除，或者变更为责令候查，没有别的出路。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（二）办案机关优先评估的是妨碍调查的风险\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条第一款列了留置的四个条件，前提是已经掌握部分违法犯罪事实及证据、仍有重要问题需要进一步调查：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">涉及案情重大、复杂的；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">可能逃跑、自杀的；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">可能串供或者伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据的；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 4. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">可能有其他妨碍调查行为的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">后三项都不是看罪名轻重，也不是看金额大小，看的是行为风险。这是家属最容易判断错的地方：以为金额小、态度好就能早点出来，实际上真正把人留在里面的，常常是一连串妨碍调查的动作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">留置期间家属最常做错的事，是替当事人传话、联系证人、处理账目和资产。这些动作一旦被认定为串供或转移证据，前面所有配合都会归零，还可能牵出新的罪名。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">反过来也成立：涉案金额不小，但到案后配合、没有妨碍行为、如实说明资金去向的，第四十八条的解除或者变更就有讨论空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（三）主动交代与退赃，改变的是两条不同的线\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">同一个动作，落在两条不同的线上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">一条是措施线。主动交代、退赃、认罪悔罪，是评估是否需要继续留置的因素，影响人在里面待多久。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">另一条是处置线。《中华人民共和国监察法》第三十四条规定，涉嫌职务犯罪的被调查人主动认罪认罚，具有自动投案、真诚悔罪悔过，积极配合调查工作、如实供述监察机关还未掌握的违法犯罪行为，积极退赃、减少损失，重大立功表现或者案件涉及国家重大利益等情形之一的，监察机关经领导人员集体研究并报上一级监察机关批准，可以在移送人民检察院时提出从宽处罚的建议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这一条要读准：从宽处罚建议在移送时提出，改善的是移送之后的量刑，不能让人不被移送。家属最容易误解的正是这一点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">三、调查终结有五个出口，移送只是其中一个\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（一）监察法第五十二条的五种处置\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十二条规定，监察机关根据监督、调查结果，依法作出五种处置：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">对有职务违法行为但情节较轻的公职人员，进行谈话提醒、批评教育、责令检查，或者予以诫勉；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">对违法的公职人员，依法作出警告、记过、记大过、降级、撤职、开除等政务处分决定；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">对不履行或者不正确履行职责负有责任的领导人员，作出问责决定或者提出问责建议；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 4. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">对涉嫌职务犯罪的，经调查认为犯罪事实清楚、证据确实充分，制作起诉意见书，连同案卷材料、证据一并移送人民检察院依法审查、提起公诉；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 5. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">对监察对象所在单位提出监察建议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">五种出口里，只有第四种进入刑事程序。前三种都在政务和纪律层面结束，第五种针对的是单位，不是人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（二）撤销案件是独立的一档\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">第五十二条第二款：监察机关经调查，对没有证据证明被调查人存在违法犯罪行为的，应当撤销案件，并通知被调查人所在单位。撤销案件后，留置应当立即解除。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这一档的门槛是证据层面不成立，不是情节轻，也不是退了钱。实务中走到这一档的比例不高，但它的存在说明留置不是一条只能通往刑事程序的单行道。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（三）移送之后还有三道关\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十四条把移送之后的路写得很具体：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">第一道，强制措施重新决定。对监察机关移送的案件，人民检察院依照刑事诉讼法对被调查人采取强制措施。移送不等于继续羁押，检察院要重新审查并作出决定，这里存在取保候审的空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">第二道，退回补充调查。检察院认为需要补充核实的，退回监察机关补充调查，必要时可以自行补充侦查。补充调查应当在一个月内完成，以二次为限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">第三道，不起诉。检察院对于有刑事诉讼法规定的不起诉情形的，经上一级人民检察院批准，依法作出不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">所以被移送不是终点。这是家属最容易陷入绝望的节点，实际恰恰是辩护工作真正开始的节点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">四、企业负责人的身份不同，路径完全不同\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（一）国有企业管理人员属于监察对象\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">监察法列明的监察对象包括国有企业管理人员。这类人被调查，可能涉及贪污、受贿、挪用公款、国有公司人员滥用职权等罪名，出口既可能是第五十二条第二项的政务处分，也可能是移送起诉。身份上属于公职人员，才会有政务处分这一档。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（二）民营老板被留置的依据是行贿或共同职务犯罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">民营企业人员不属于监察法列明的那六类监察对象。民营老板被留置，依据是第二十四条第二款：对涉嫌行贿犯罪或者共同职务犯罪的涉案人员，监察机关可以依照前款规定采取留置措施。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这一款的地位常被误读。它说明监委管的是行贿这一头，或者与公职人员共同实施的职务犯罪，不是管民营老板的企业经营本身。最终落到人身上的罪名，通常是行贿罪、单位行贿罪，或者贪污罪、受贿罪的共犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">由此产生一个关键差别：民营老板没有政务处分这一档。第五十二条第二项的政务处分只适用于公职人员。所以民营老板的出口实质上只有三个：撤销案件、移送后不起诉、移送后判缓刑或者较轻刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这一条也是很多家属误解的来源。以为找人协调、接受一个处分就能过去，对民营老板不成立，因为处分这一档在法律上根本不存在。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师，前检察官，在检察机关从事审查逮捕与审查起诉工作十年，团队接手这类案件先确认三样东西：当事人是不是监察对象、涉嫌的是什么罪名、当前处在哪一档措施。这三样定了，后面的动作才有方向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（三）两类人的出口差别\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">国有企业管理人员：政务处分、问责、移送起诉，三条路都在法律上敞开着。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">民营老板：只有撤销案件、移送后不起诉、移送后从轻三条路，中间没有处分这一档可以落。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">共同点：是否移送，取决于犯罪事实是否清楚、证据是否确实充分，与身份无关；而能不能在移送前解除留置，两类人都适用第四十八条和第五十条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">五、两个案例\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">以下案例系卓安律师事务所办理，已作案情脱敏处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（一）行贿案：留置五个半月后解除，随后仍被移送\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">卓安律师事务所办理的一起案件。当事人是某公司实际控制人，因涉嫌行贿罪、对非国家工作人员行贿罪被某县监察委员会立案调查，十二月四日被留置，次年三月三日延长留置三个月，五月十九日解除留置，七月二日移送县人民检察院。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">辩护人从定性入手，主张涉案款项以单位名义支付、来源于公司账户、违法所得归单位所有，应认定为单位行贿罪而非个人行贿；同时提交认罪悔罪、全部退缴违法所得五百七十三万余元的意见。检察院采纳，罪名变更为单位行贿罪，法院判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金五十万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这个案子有两处值得记住。第一，留置五个半月后解除，人先出来了，一个半月后仍被移送。解除留置与案件终结是两件事，家属不能在解除那天就当作结束。第二，从个人行贿改为单位行贿，量刑档次变了，这是缓刑能够成立的前提。定性之争的价值，往往高于态度之争。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">（二）串通投标案：两年后撤销案件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">另一件由卓安律师事务所办理的案件。江苏某环保公司因某县污水治理项目招标被以串通投标罪立案，公司负责人及员工被调查，部分被刑事拘留，公司当时正处于准备上市阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">辩护从主体资格和行为两方面切入：另外两家陪标企业不具备招标要求的独家技术，不满足招标资质，因而不具备串通投标罪的投标人主体资格；公司系应政府要求邀请陪标，但对投标报价没有串通。被拘留第三十七天，直接负责人和工作人员取保；一年有余，全部取保候审期限届满，公安机关未作进一步处理；两年有余，正式撤销案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">这个案子的出口是撤销案件，代价是两年多时间，以及上市进程被打断。这条路真实存在，靠的是证据和法律适用，不是时间自然流逝。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">六、涉及的法律依据\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 1. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十一条 强制到案及其十二小时、二十四小时时限\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 2. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十三条 责令候查的四种情形与五项义务\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 3. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条 留置的四个条件，及对行贿、共同职务犯罪涉案人员的适用\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 4. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十五条 管护的三种对象与二十四小时送所要求\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 5. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第三十四条 主动认罪认罚情形下移送时提出从宽处罚建议\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 6. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十六条 强制到案、责令候查、管护的批准程序与期限\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 7. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十八条 留置三个月及延长规则，不需要继续留置时应当解除或变更\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 8. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十条 通知家属、近亲属申请变更与三日答复、留置折抵刑期\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 9. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十二条 五种处置方式与撤销案件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\"> 10. \u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十四条 移送后强制措施、退回补充调查、不起诉\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">结语\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">企业负责人涉案，能不能早点出来，不是一个态度问题，是三个格子的位置问题：措施在哪一档、期限走到哪一步、出口在哪一条。身份再叠一层，国有企业管理人员和民营老板的出口本来就不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">家属能做的事不多，但每一件都要做对。不替当事人传话，不联系证人，不擅自处理账目和资产，这三件事守住了，才不会把风险条件变成现实。申请变更要在法定时限内提出，留置期限届满时盯住解除或者变更这两条路。做错其中一件，前面所有的配合都可能白费。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51);\">卓安（重庆）律师事务所 吴亮\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-27 17:13:17",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"商人老板涉案被调查：解除留置与移送起诉之间隔着四道判断 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 企业负责人被留置，家属最先问的是什么时候能出来。这个问题的答案不在态度好坏，在三个地方：措施选在哪一档、期限走到哪一步、案子最终从哪个出口出去。立案不等于留置，留置也不等于移送。2024 年修正、2025 年 6 月 1 日施行的监察法在留置之外新增了责令候查，最长十二个月，把中间档补上了；同时明确留置措施不当或","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F1104",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-27T17:13:17+08:00","2026-10-27T17:20:32+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F7cedcc3e-3266-43d6-995e-4f11c4e68554.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]