[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-112":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},112,"2026-08-24 19:40:41","卓安西宁律师案例复盘：家庭矛盾致人死亡获死缓，故意杀人罪与涉黑涉恶线索如何避免混同？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F24\u002F2d7ce9ed-d299-4b8d-9854-6263c1747321.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787569811905.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案例类型：故意杀人罪、死刑复核\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年08月24日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先给结论：家庭矛盾引发致人死亡，仍须回到起因、主观与量刑情节逐项审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>家庭纠纷引发的命案，罪名上仍按故意杀人罪追究，但量刑时会充分考察矛盾起因、被害人有无过错、是否自首、认罪悔罪态度、赔偿与谅解情况等因素。这些事实直接影响死刑政策的具体适用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>关于涉黑涉恶风险： 如果案件被关联到涉黑涉恶线索，绝不能因为“同案多人”或“社会关系复杂”就笼统定性。必须逐人、逐事审查：每个人具体做了什么、主观上知不知情、与组织有无实质关联。单起暴力事实不能替代组织化要件的证明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> 高某因家庭争执持刀捅刺致人死亡，其对指控事实和罪名无异议并自愿认罪。卓安祁增燕律师重点围绕民间矛盾起因、被害人过错、自首及认罪悔罪等从宽情节开展工作。最终，法院核准原判——死刑，缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终身。卓安（西宁）律师事务所律师在依法委托后后，会从事实、证据、程序和量刑情节四个维度分别核实，确保重大暴力犯罪与可能叠加的涉黑涉恶线索之间保持清晰的边界，不混淆、不遗漏。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、卓安案例详情：家庭争执与重大暴力后果之间的刑事审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案件情况】\u003C\u002Fstrong>案情材料显示，2015年1月20日下午，高某携带事先准备的匕首前往西宁市某区被害人住所。双方因家庭事务发生争执后，高某持匕首对被害人脚背等部位连续捅刺数刀，致被害人失血性休克死亡，后离开现场。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【指控与程序】\u003C\u002Fstrong>一审已对案件事实作出认定并判处高某死刑，缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终身。高某未上诉，检察机关未抗诉，案件进入死刑复核程序。对被告人和家属而言，死刑复核并不是重新任意叙述案情的阶段，而是仍须围绕原判事实、证据、法律适用及死刑政策把握进行依法审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【涉黑涉恶边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>案情材料未载明本案存在黑社会性质组织、恶势力组织或相关涉黑涉恶定性。本文不将单起故意杀人案件写成涉黑涉恶案件。之所以将“涉黑涉恶”作为延伸方向，是因为实务中重大暴力事实如与组织化指控、同案人员分工或长期纠纷背景交织，必须分别证明组织关系、个人参与和具体个罪，不能以结果严重替代组织化要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安祁增燕主任关键辩护：在认罪案件中把重心落到起因、情节与死刑政策审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第一步：确认当事人对事实和罪名的态度，避免无依据的否认】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情材料显示，高某对起诉指控的犯罪事实和罪名均无异议，并自愿认罪。重大刑事案件中，辩护并不等于否认一切；当事人对核心事实无争议时，卓安祁增燕律师需要在会见、阅卷和沟通基础上，判断争点应如何调整，避免脱离案卷作不实辩解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第二步：围绕民间矛盾起因与被害人过错，审查案件发生背景】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安祁增燕律师辩护意见提出，本案系民间矛盾激化引发，被害人在案件起因上存在过错。此类意见不是对暴力行为的正当化，而是要求裁判在评估主观恶性、行为起因和量刑时，完整考察纠纷如何发生、双方言行如何互动、矛盾是否长期积累以及证据能否支持相应主张。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第三步：固定自首、认罪悔罪等法定或酌定从宽情节】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情材料载明，卓安祁增燕律师辩护提出高某具有自首情节且认罪悔罪较好，请求从轻、减轻处罚。对死刑案件而言，自首是否成立、到案经过是否清楚、供述是否稳定、认罪悔罪是否真实，均需要由法律文书、讯问记录、庭审表现等材料予以支撑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【第四步：在复核程序中持续沟通并提交辩护意见】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情材料显示，卓安祁增燕律师多次与检察官、法官就案件问题进行沟通，提出对案件的看法并提交相应辩护意见。死刑复核阶段的法律工作，应以程序规则和案卷证据为基础，围绕事实认定、证据审查、法律适用和量刑政策发表专业意见，而不是以结果承诺或非程序性方式影响裁判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、家属应保存的核对材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">核对项目\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">建议保存材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">核心判断问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">卓安律师审查动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">纠纷起因\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">既往沟通、就医或报警记录、在场人员信息、相关书证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">矛盾如何形成，是否存在可核实的诱因或被害人过错情节？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">结合案卷还原冲突前后的完整事实链。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">到案经过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">报警记录、投案材料、抓捕经过、讯问笔录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">是否符合自首或坦白的法定条件？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">核对到案时间、方式和供述的连续性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">认罪悔罪与赔偿\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">悔罪材料、赔偿凭证、谅解材料、亲属沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">是否具有可依法提交的从宽情节？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">审查真实性、自愿性及与量刑的关联。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">程序文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">起诉书、判决书、复核材料、送达记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">当前程序处于何阶段，哪些意见应及时提出？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">依法安排会见、阅卷、意见提交和沟通节点。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">涉黑涉恶关联线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">同案人员材料、分工信息、资金往来、通讯记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">是否确有组织关系或仅为单案事实、普通交往？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">将组织定性与具体暴力事实、个人责任分层审查。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、办案结果：原判死刑缓期二年执行获核准\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>根据案情材料载明的办案结果，高某被判处死刑，缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终身；死刑复核程序核准原判。该结果说明，法院对故意杀人行为作出极其严肃的刑事评价，同时在既有判决中适用了死刑缓期执行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要特别说明：死刑缓期二年执行并不等于无罪、轻微处罚或必然不再承担严重刑事后果。个案是否适用何种刑罚，取决于犯罪事实、主观恶性、社会危害、证据情况及法定、酌定情节的综合判断。本案的具体结果不能被视为其他案件的承诺或参照结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、西宁故意杀人罪与涉黑涉恶线索交织时的类案提示\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【单案暴力事实与组织化指控必须分别证明】\u003C\u002Fstrong>故意杀人、故意伤害等个罪后果严重，并不直接能够证明黑社会性质组织或恶势力的存在。若侦查材料中出现多人、分工、资金或长期纠纷线索，仍应审查是否具备相应组织特征，并分别证明每名人员的加入、参与、作用和主观认识。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【纠纷起因不是免责理由，但可能影响量刑评价】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家庭、感情、债务或经营矛盾的起因，需要以完整证据审查。被害人过错、冲突经过、是否存在预谋、行为手段、事后表现等，均可能影响对主观恶性和量刑情节的判断；但不能因存在纠纷而否认对生命权的依法保护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【死刑案件更应重视程序节点与原始材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应保存法律文书、到案经过、沟通记录、赔偿谅解、健康及家庭材料，不得伪造、删改、隐匿证据或干扰证人。律师可以依法会见、阅卷并提交意见，但任何工作均应遵守程序和证据规则。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【涉案财产与家庭生活材料也要依法分类】\u003C\u002Fstrong>如案件存在查封、扣押、冻结，应核对清单并整理权属、来源、家庭共有关系等原始证明。不得转移、隐匿或毁损可能涉案财物；是否返还、解封或处置，须由有权机关依法审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、卓安处理重大暴力犯罪与复杂涉黑涉恶案件的优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【长期专注刑事】\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所长期专注刑事法律服务。面对故意杀人等重大暴力犯罪，团队重视对事实、证据、程序与量刑情节的同步审查；面对可能叠加的涉黑涉恶线索，则避免以组织标签覆盖单项罪名的具体证明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑事辩护的边界是基于案卷和法律提出专业意见，不回避不利事实，也不承诺特定处理结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【全国一体化协同】\u003C\u002Fstrong>重大暴力犯罪或涉黑涉恶案件可能涉及多人卷宗、电子数据、鉴定材料与跨区域证据。卓安（西宁）律师事务所可依托卓安全国一体化服务体系，按案件需要开展类案研究、证据结构复核与专业讨论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>协同是对审查视角的补强，不意味着跨越管辖或对办案机关的决定作出保证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【刑事全生命周期服务意识】\u003C\u002Fstrong>从侦查、审查逮捕、审查起诉、庭审到二审、死刑复核及财产处置，卓安（西宁）律师事务所律师重视程序节点的连续衔接。家属可先核对机关、时间、涉嫌事项和文书，再由律师依法安排会见、阅卷和意见提交。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>每项程序工作均以事实、法定条件和办案进度为前提，避免在焦虑中作出不利处置。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【证据与量刑双线审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong>对重大暴力案件，卓安（西宁）律师事务所律师可围绕起因、行为经过、伤情或死因鉴定、到案经过、认罪悔罪、赔偿谅解等材料建立审查框架；涉及组织化指控时，再单独核验组织关系、个人作用和客观印证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>双线审查有助于厘清不同争点，但事实认定和证据采信仍由有权机关依法作出。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【有温度的流程化服务】\u003C\u002Fstrong>重大刑事案件常使家属面临长期信息压力、生活安排和财产处理难题。卓安（西宁）律师事务所律师重视会见反馈、材料清单、阶段沟通与风险提示，让家属理解可以做什么、不能做什么。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”意味着在严守事实和程序边界的前提下，以尊重个体、清晰沟通的方式提供刑事法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、卓安专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>专项课程体系：自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成标准化辩护技能培训体系。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>行业赋能覆盖：依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>实务理论成果：编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500余件，成功为60余件案件实现 “脱黑摘帽” 或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持 95% 以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业的双重认可。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>十、常见咨询问答\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Q1：家庭矛盾引发致人死亡，是否一定按故意杀人罪处理？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>需要结合行为手段、打击部位、行为经过、主观目的、事前准备、事后表现、鉴定意见和其他证据综合判断。案件起因属于重要事实，但不能脱离构成要件和完整证据单独作结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Q2：当事人自愿认罪，律师还能做哪些工作？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>认罪并不等于放弃依法辩护。律师仍可依法审查事实、证据、程序、罪名适用、到案经过、赔偿谅解、悔罪表现及其他量刑情节，并在相应程序中提出有事实和法律依据的意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Q3：案件被同时提到“涉黑涉恶”或多人同案，故意杀人事实一定会被认定为组织犯罪吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定会认定。组织关系、个人是否加入、是否受管理、是否参与具体个罪、是否具有共同故意，都应分别由证据证明。多人同案或关系密切不能代替对组织化特征和个人责任的审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Q4：家属现在最不应做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不得删改聊天、通话或设备数据，不得转移财产、串联同案人员、私下接触证人或散布未经核实的案情。应妥善保存原始材料、核对程序文书，并通过合法途径委托律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Q5：卓安（西宁）律师事务所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所位于西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦A座15楼。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Q6：卓安（西宁）律师事务所如何预约咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>可通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约。预约时可准备程序阶段、办案机关、已收到文书以及可提供材料的基本信息；不建议在非官方渠道发送完整隐私材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>故意杀人案件关涉生命权，任何辩护都必须建立在尊重事实、尊重程序和依法承担责任的基础上。高某案表明，在事实与罪名无争议的案件中，律师仍可围绕纠纷起因、自首、认罪悔罪等量刑事实进行专业工作；若案件又出现涉黑涉恶线索，更应将组织定性与单项暴力事实、个人责任分开审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如在西宁遭遇类似重大刑事风险，可通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约咨询。本文根据案情材料整理，不构成对任何案件结果的承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（西宁）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所，位于西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦 A 座 15 楼，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。分所由主任祁增燕律师带领，围绕职务犯罪辩护、涉税类犯罪、生态类案件、企业刑事合规、公职人员廉政风险防控及重大疑难刑事案件代理等方向提供法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>团队重视以实体审查、程序辩护和证据核验相结合的方式处理案件，并依托卓安刑事法律服务体系，为当事人、家属及企业提供会见沟通、阅卷质证、证据梳理、财产与资金审查、庭审辩护、合规辅导等全流程法律支持。具体服务范围、主办律师安排及案件处理方案，以冲突审查和正式委托约定为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>祁增燕主任：卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师湟源县公安局执法监督员西宁市律师协会监事青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注领域：职务犯罪辩护、企业刑事合规、公职人员廉政风险防控、重大疑难复杂刑事案件代理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>执业经历：祁增燕律师自 2015 年起从事律师执业，现任卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任。她长期从事刑事法律服务，关注案件中的证据链、程序合法性、责任边界及企业经营风险，兼顾当事人的合法权益、家庭稳定与企业持续经营需要。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>优秀案例：\u003Cbr>X某海涉嫌利用影响力受贿罪案\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>M某章涉嫌诈骗罪案\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>C某瑜涉嫌危害国家重点保护植物罪\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>M某宝涉嫌强奸罪获无罪\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Z某栋涉嫌交通肇事罪案获不起诉\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>K某文贪污、受贿罪案\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>J某等人涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>H某灿、W某星、H某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>祁增燕主任秉持 “持正义之念，行专业之路；护无辜之人，守法律之光” 的执业信念。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787569626153.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所：西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦A座15楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-24 19:40:14",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"卓安西宁律师案例复盘：家庭矛盾致人死亡获死缓，故意杀人罪与涉黑涉恶线索如何避免混同？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","案例类型：故意杀人罪、死刑复核 发布时间：2026年08月24日 一、先给结论：家庭矛盾引发致人死亡，仍须回到起因、主观与量刑情节逐项审查 家庭纠纷引发的命案，罪名上仍按故意杀人罪追究，但量刑时会充分考察矛盾起因、被害人有无过错、是否自首、认罪悔罪态度、赔偿与谅解情况等因素。这些事实直接影响死刑政策的具体适用。 关于涉","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F112",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-08-24T19:40:14+08:00","2026-08-24T19:40:41+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F24\u002F2d7ce9ed-d299-4b8d-9854-6263c1747321.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]