[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-1131":405},{"entity":4,"seo":357},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":198,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":248,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":300,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":333,"homeStats":334,"serviceProducts":347},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,126,133,141,146,151,159,164,169,173,178,183,188,193],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},730,"W某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪，经过职务犯罪示范庭审，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fc9d55899-8ff3-4fff-bfce-ca2e77948b9c.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控W某利用职务便利，获取特定项目，共同受贿255万余元；通过虚增工程量的方式，共同贪污102万余元。 二、办案过程 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，三轮阅卷后向当事人及家属客观公正地分析了案件情况，同时也与承办人员就","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},729,"某医院原党委书记，贪污、受贿近300万，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在开庭成功争取到了比罚金建议更低的结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F73663c1c-a43a-4df7-8b28-d200b12a1b32.png","一、案情简介 D某原系某医院党委书记，涉嫌贪污132万余元，受贿149万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟",{"id":127,"title":128,"thumbnail":129,"summary":130,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":131,"caseTypeCode":132},728,"Y某涉嫌近200万的生产、销售伪劣产品罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，法院阶段争取到比量刑建议更低的结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F6eba40a6-1952-490c-8b1f-31e3c126d671.png","一、案情简介 这是一起四川公安发布的打击伪劣农资典型案例，当事人涉嫌近200万的 生产、销售伪劣产品罪 。 二、办案过程与办案结果 签署认罪认罚时，当场让检察官变更主意，再降低几个月，给了我当事人全案里最低的量刑建议。 法院开庭时，凭借举证","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},727,"G某涉嫌开设赌场罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，当天成功取保","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fc20dcabc-bc0b-43b5-afdb-b88d93889c55.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人五年前去到柬埔寨某公司任职UI界面设计师，该公司开发擦边软件，软件界面同时接受了赌博网站的广告导流，当事人获利数十万，涉嫌违法犯罪。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属咨询之后，客观公正地分析了案件情况，",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},726,"H某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，从轻处罚并帮家属省下80万","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fae38a2b9-7c5c-4e9f-8b91-0cc1c6e538c1.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控被告人向他人出售公民个人信息，违法所得数额共计为 519715 元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},725,"S某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪，钟灵柔律师为其展开辩护，成功取保并变更为掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，最终获得缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F664ed1f9-935e-483d-aab4-6e458bb5129f.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 和办案结果 这个案件的法检阶段，都超预期地完成了当事人和家属的期待。 审查起诉阶段：在批准",{"id":152,"title":153,"thumbnail":154,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":156,"caseTypeName":157,"caseTypeCode":158},724,"Y某涉嫌抢劫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F6712a84f-37c1-4c10-89b6-6573787864f8.png","一、案情简介 Y某在网上约嫖，在进入卖淫女房间后，将卖淫女殴打至轻伤，抢走其财物后逃离。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":160,"title":161,"thumbnail":162,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":131,"caseTypeCode":132},723,"L某涉嫌强迫交易罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师在公安报捕前成功为其取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F40bf6af8-8be7-4d80-a025-d4938838a27b.png","一、案情简介 L某系拉矿车队人员，由于与矿山承包商签订合同事宜，引起纠纷，参与了三次堵车以及一次上访事件，后被公安以涉嫌 强迫交易罪 刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 接受家属委托后第一时间会见当事人，梳理出两次堵车与上访事件的来龙去脉，后续结合和",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":167,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":131,"caseTypeCode":132},722,"L某涉嫌50万强迫交易罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Ffb77c0f9-6294-4795-863f-644f11d1d3b4.png","一、案例罪名： 强迫交易罪 二、案情简介 办案机关指控我方通过三次堵路，多次信访，使被害单位已签约的公司被迫退出，从而强迫让被害单位与我方签订运输合同，被害单位已给付我方运费50万元。 三、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},721,"S某涉嫌滥用职权罪，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功获得缓刑","一、案情简介 公诉 机关指控，S某在履行工作职责过程中，未严格按照工作要求履行职责，致使一百余户不符合落户政策的人员违规落户，破坏了户籍管理制度和成都区域商品房市场的调控政策。 二、办案过程 在三轮阅卷后，向当事人详细地反馈了案件的有利情况",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},720,"Z某作为网游公司小组长，涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其进行无罪辩护，公安阶段终止侦查，不留案底","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F37dc25e7-1563-4f6f-80cb-3a3fec926fbe.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人作为网游公司小组长，帮助公司实施 开设赌场 的行为。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展沟通工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},719,"C某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F90dc3041-9512-4a3b-a0c7-856587a08015.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人六年前任职的公司，开发的麻将软件和第三方结算软件相接，拉拢赌客进行赌博，公司获利x百万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展沟通工作，客观公正地分析了案件情",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},718,"L某涉嫌境外开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F90dcd643-3b33-4582-a934-beb9039b4bdb.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人多年前前往园区，进入的公司，从事运维工作半年，获利十余万元，涉嫌。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展沟通工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},717,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后仍然成功取保","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F84cc9646-3f5b-4624-b392-d02e53a89c6e.png","一、案情简介 当事人与他人合伙开茶楼，因在茶楼里组织打德州并且还每盘进行抽成，故被侦查机关抓获。 二、办案过程 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，侦查阶段虽批准逮捕，但为案件其他有利情节已打下基础。在检察院审查起诉阶段能够阅卷后，认为指控的违",{"id":194,"title":195,"thumbnail":196,"summary":197,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},716,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在逮捕后最终成功缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F8b9dc830-73a7-4c2c-bbd8-c31f7ff0771c.png","一、案情简介 当事人作为茶楼股东，在茶楼内组织打德州扑克，抽头获利3万元，被挡获归案。 二、辩护思路 1. 本案茶楼共三名股东，当事人是小股东，目前已全额退赃 2. 本案系在茶楼包间内打德扑抽钱，相较于其他 开设赌场 行为社会危害性更低 3",[199,202,207,210,215,220,223,229],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":200,"keywords":201},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":203,"name":204,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":132,"name":131,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":216,"name":217,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":156,"code":158,"name":157,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":243,"lawyer":247},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[244],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[249,252,265,277,288],{"id":234,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":250},[251],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":253,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":254,"city":255,"caseType":256,"title":257,"thumbnail":258,"content":10,"publishTime":259,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":260,"lawyers":261},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[262],{"id":254,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":260,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":264,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":266,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":267,"city":268,"caseType":269,"title":270,"thumbnail":271,"content":10,"publishTime":272,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":273,"lawyers":274},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[275],{"id":267,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":273,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":276,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":278,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":279,"city":280,"caseType":238,"title":281,"thumbnail":282,"content":10,"publishTime":283,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":284,"lawyers":285},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[286],{"id":279,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":287,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":289,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":290,"city":291,"caseType":292,"title":293,"thumbnail":294,"content":10,"publishTime":295,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":296,"lawyers":297},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[298],{"id":290,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":296,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":299,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[335,338,341,344],{"value":336,"label":337},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":339,"label":340},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":342,"label":343},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":345,"label":346},"6","全国分所",[348,351,354],{"title":349,"desc":350},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":352,"desc":353},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":355,"desc":356},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":358,"description":13,"keywords":359,"canonical":360,"image":10,"jsonLd":361},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[362],{"@context":363,"@graph":364},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[365,371],{"@type":366,"@id":367,"url":360,"name":7,"inLanguage":368,"publisher":369},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":372,"@id":370,"name":7,"url":360,"logo":373,"image":373,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":368,"address":374,"geo":377,"department":379},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":376},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":378,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[380,385,389,393,397,401],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":383,"parentOrganization":384},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":386,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":387,"parentOrganization":388},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":390,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":391,"parentOrganization":392},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":394,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":395,"parentOrganization":396},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":398,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":399,"parentOrganization":400},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":402,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":403,"parentOrganization":404},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":370},{"entity":406,"seo":417},{"id":407,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":408,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":409,"thumbnail":410,"content":411,"publishTime":412,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":413},1131,"2026-10-28 14:14:02","四川职务犯罪辩护｜受贿案的数额如何认定，卓安魏军主任谈违纪金额与犯罪金额的分界","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F758db307-2472-4d7e-9743-ae29382ca42e.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F99666872-9685-4ce0-bcfe-d5232102c666.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml19764\\wps31.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">主题标签： 职务犯罪｜受贿罪｜数额认定｜违纪金额｜量刑档次｜四川\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">发布时间： 2026年10月28日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">发布机构： 卓安律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·职务犯罪辩护部\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">先把结论说清楚：受贿案件的辩护，很多时候不是“有没有收”，而是“收的这笔钱算什么”。同一个数字，放在违纪里是党纪政务处分，放在犯罪里是三年以上；同一个人，起诉意见书写八百余万，判决认定三百余万，差的不是运气，是每一笔的性质。数额认定的关键在四件事：这笔钱有没有对应的请托事项、有没有实际取得、有没有重复计算、有没有把家庭合法收入混进来。魏军主任在法院刑二庭审理职务犯罪多年，看数额的习惯是先看“笔”，再看“总”——总数是结果，笔数是功夫。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">魏军主任是卓安律师事务所副主任，毕业于西北政法大学，原成都市中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，长期审理职务犯罪与经济犯罪案件，曾审理全国首例操纵商品期货市场案，并曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草，现为西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心特邀研究员、四川师范大学法律硕士专业学位研究生兼职指导教师。从审判席转到辩护席，他保留了一个习惯：先想这份证据写进判决书会怎么被评价，再决定要不要争、怎么争。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、卓安魏军主任在受贿数额认定上的“逐笔核减”经验\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">数额辩护不是把总数往下砍，而是把每一笔放回它所属的格子里。格子放对了，总数自然下来；格子放错了，砍得再狠也站不住。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1.1 先看两个案件：同样八百余万，判决认定三百余万\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例一：某市部门负责人涉受贿案——四类款项的剥离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">困境：起诉意见书认定受贿八百余万元，涉及二十余笔款项，时间跨度十一年。这些款项里，有的是逢年过节的礼金，有的是当事人向管理对象借的钱，有的是以“投资分红”名义收取的款项，还有两笔只有约定、始终没有实际交付。家属的说法是“很多都是人情往来”，但说不清哪一笔对应哪一件事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">切入点：卓安团队把二十余笔按四类拆开。第一类，违纪礼金——没有具体请托事项、单笔金额不大、时间集中在节日，这类属于违纪，不进入受贿评价；第二类，借款——有借条、有约定的利息、有还款记录，且出借人并非当事人职务上的管理对象，这类要按民事关系处理；第三类，投资收益——真实出资、共担风险、按比例分配，与“只收钱不担风险”的干股分红要分开；第四类，未实际取得——约定给予但未交付、代持但未过户，这部分在认定上要单独讨论。拆完之后，团队成员逐笔做表：时间、事由、金额、付款方式、对应事项、凭证来源，六列填满。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">结果：起诉书认定的数额较起诉意见书下降，量刑档次随之下移；其中两笔因缺乏请托对应关系未予认定，一笔因未实际取得另行评价。当事人对判决结果表示接受，没有上诉。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例二：某区属国企负责人涉受贿案——“干股”与分红的区别\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">困境：指控认为当事人收受合作方给予的干股，并按持股比例分得红利，两部分都计入受贿数额。当事人的疑问是：股份没有过户，钱是每年打过来的，凭什么股份和分红都算？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">切入点：团队把“股份价值”与“实际分红”分开。股份未办理变更登记、当事人也未实际参与经营决策的，其价值是否已实际取得，需要证据支撑；而每年实际到账的分红，属于实际取得的利益，这一部分通常难以否认。反过来，如果分红中包含公司正常经营带来的回报，还要看当事人有没有真实出资、有没有承担经营风险。分开算之后，数字与合并计算差距明显。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">结果：法院对分红部分予以认定，对股份价值部分按在案证据另行评价，全案数额与量刑相应调整。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">还有一个常被忽略的细节：同一笔款项在不同年份的表述可能不一致。当事人当年在笔录里说“是借的”，几年后又说“是给的”，这种前后变化往往不是撒谎，而是记忆与压力共同作用的结果。遇到这种情况，与其急着统一说法，不如把当年的借条、还款记录、双方的资金往来一并摆出来，让书证说话——书证的稳定性，远高于记忆。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这两件案子有一个共同点：辩护不是否认收钱，而是否认“这些钱都属于同一种性质”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml19764\\wps32.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F1a576b7b-f52b-4b24-9712-4a28e61d0df6.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1.2 再拆方法：数额认定的四个层次\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">魏军主任把数额问题拆成四层，逐层过，不跳步。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一层：性质层——这笔钱是违纪、违法，还是犯罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">违规收受礼品礼金属于违纪，与受贿之间隔着三个条件：是否利用职务便利为他人谋利、财物价值是否达到法定标准、是否存在权钱交易的对应关系。家属容易犯的错，是把“收过礼”直接等同于“受贿”，于是要么过度恐慌、劝当事人乱认，要么反过来一概否认，两种做法都会把可以争的部分让出去。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二层：取得层——有没有实际拿到。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">受贿以实际取得为原则。约定给予但未交付、由他人代持但未过户、以借款名义支付但实际未还，这些情形在认定上都有讨论空间。这一层要看的是资金流向：钱进了谁的账户、什么时候进的、之后怎么用的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三层：时间层——追诉期限与行为期。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">跨度十年的案件，早期几笔可能涉及追诉期限问题；同一笔款项在不同年份重复出现，也可能是记账方式造成的重复计算。团队做表时会把时间轴拉出来，标出每一笔的起点与终点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四层：证据层——每一笔靠什么证明。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">受贿案件的证据结构通常是“行贿人陈述＋被告人供述＋书证”。三者能对上的部分，争的空间有限；只有言词、没有书证的部分，就要看细节是否稳定、有无矛盾、是否符合常理。魏军主任的习惯是：先看行贿人陈述的细节，再看被告人供述的细节，最后看账目能不能对上——三样都对不上，这一笔就该打问号。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">四层过完，数额才是一个有结构的数字，而不是一个笼统的总额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">还有一处常被漏掉：同一笔钱在行贿方与受贿方两边的记账可能不一致。行贿方按“业务招待费”入账，受贿方按“借款”记账，两边金额还差几千块。这类差额往往不是谁在撒谎，而是记账口径不同。团队会把两边的数字并排放，差额单独列表，避免把记账差异当成新的犯罪事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1.3 团队配置：数额之辩要有人“算得清”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">数额辩护的工作量集中在前期：几十笔款项、十几年的账户、成堆的凭证。魏军主任的配置是“主办律师＋金额核对小组＋所内复核”：主办定争点、出意见，核对小组做逐笔表与凭证比对，重大节点提交所内集体研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">他在团队里负责的是审判视角的研判：同一份证据，写进判决书会怎么被评价，量刑时会不会被采纳。这个视角决定了哪些笔值得争、哪些笔争了也没用——把力气花在前者身上，是数额辩护效率的来源。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、卓安魏军主任办理职务犯罪案件的优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">数额认定这件事，既需要熟悉条文，也需要熟悉判决是怎么写出来的。魏军主任的两段经历，刚好覆盖这两头。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.1 长期专注刑事法律服务：从审判到辩护，一条线没断\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安由成安博士于 2013 年发起设立，是全国首批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一，只做刑事。魏军主任在法院刑二庭长期审理职务犯罪与经济犯罪案件，转到律所后仍在这一条线上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注带来的差别很具体：受贿数额的三档标准、从宽情节的认定口径、罚金刑的裁量幅度、涉案财物处理的方式，这些不是靠查资料能查出来的手感。判过同类案件的人，对“这个数额大概落在哪一档”有直觉，而直觉决定策略。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.2 团队优势：复合型刑事律师团队\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安刑事辩护委员会下设十个业务部，职务犯罪辩护部由具有原检察机关反贪与反渎、人民法院刑事审判背景的律师与刑事诉讼法学专家组成。有侦查经历的人知道笔录是怎么形成的，有公诉经历的人知道起诉书是怎么挑证据的，有审判经历的人知道合议庭会追问什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">流程上也有约束：受案前先查利益冲突，重大定性问题必须经所内集体讨论，对外不作结果承诺。这三条听起来是管理要求，实际影响的是判断质量——一个人容易看偏的地方，三个人一起看往往能纠回来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.3 全国化、一体化服务能力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安在成都设总所，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有分所，全国一体化办案，累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">对数额认定有实际意义：行贿方在省外、关联企业在多个省市、资金经过多地账户流转的案件，取证与核对都要跨地域。一体化办案省掉的是协调成本，而数额核对怕拖——拖到开庭前才补齐凭证，质证时已经来不及。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.4 案件成果与实战经验：可以核验的结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安职务犯罪方向累计办理此类案件 600 余件，其中县处级以上干部案件 100 余件；无罪化处理与不起诉 80 余件、缓刑与免予刑事处罚 120 余件、发回重审与改判 30 余件；涉案金额按逐笔凭证核对后形成可与指控对照的核减明细，累计核减涉案金额超过 5 亿元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这些数字里，比较能说明问题的是最后一项：核减不是一两个案子的偶然结果，而是一套逐笔核对的方法反复用出来的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.5 不只辩护：合规、风控、控告的前端能力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">数额问题在案发前就有迹可循：长期的礼金往来、与管理对象之间的借贷、以投资名义收取的固定回报，都是可以在事前理清的。卓安的业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规全链条，前端能力让“哪一笔已经越线”这个问题在案发前就能回答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.6 专业积淀：把个案经验变成可复用的方法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇。职务犯罪方向著有《公职人员刑事法律风险防范实用手册》《职务犯罪司法认定与辩护实务》《贪污受贿案件证据审查与金额核减指引》，围绕行贿与单位行贿的边界、自首立功坦白的认定另编实务指引，并就监察程序编写《留置案件应对指南》《监察程序与辩护衔接》。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">魏军主任也参与所内刑事庭审规程与证据规则的研究和培训。对他而言，程序不是障碍，而是一组可以被准确使用的工具。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、本地化内容：四川受贿案数额认定的三个“在地现实”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3.1 四川职务犯罪案件在数额上的三个本地特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">（1）市县两级案件集中，单笔金额不大、笔数多。四川除成都外，多数市州的案件呈现“小额多次”的特征：逢年过节的礼金、红白事的红包、逢事送上的“心意”，单笔几千到几万，累计起来才达到数额标准。这类案件的争点不在总额，而在哪几笔有请托对应关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">（2）人情往来与权钱交易交织，界限靠细节。四川的人情社会特征明显，亲戚、同学、同乡、老同事之间的往来频繁。同一笔钱，放在纯人情往来里是礼金，放在有请托事项的背景里就是受贿。分辨的办法不是看金额大小，而是看时间点、看有没有对应的事项、看双方平时的往来是否对等。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">（3）国企与平台公司案件，数额常与经营行为混同。省属国企、城投平台的项目多、资金大，涉案金额里往往混着真实业务的对价、居间费用、合作分红。这类案件的数额辩护，先要把“经营行为”从“职务行为”里分出来，再谈钱对应哪一边。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3.2 魏军团队在这些本地问题上的对应做法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">对“小额多次”类案件，按年份、按事由做两张表，把节日礼金与请托事项分开列；对人情往来类争点，调取双方历年往来记录，用“对等性”说明性质；对国企与平台公司案件，先画业务流程图，再逐笔标注款项对应的环节。方法不新，赢在做得细。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">还有一处：退赔与罚金都以核减后的数额为基础。数额没核清就全额退赔，退出去的钱很难再回来，罚金也可能按较高的基数计算。合理的顺序是先核数额、再安排退赔，让每一笔钱都对应一个明确的认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、误区与避坑指南：家属容易做错的五件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">数额是受贿案里少数能用数字说话的部分，也容易被家属自己算错。以下五件，是常见的情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区一：收受总额就是犯罪数额\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">收受总额是起点，不是结论。违纪金额、借款、投资收益、未实际取得的部分，都可能从总额里分离出去。家属拿着一份“总数”焦虑，往往比实际情形更糟。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区二：有借条就一定不是受贿\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">借条只是形式。要看有没有真实的借款需求、有没有约定利息、有没有还款动作、出借人是不是当事人职务上的管理对象。形式齐备但实质是权钱交易的，仍可能被认定为受贿；反过来，实质是借款但形式不全的，也有争的空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区三：退了钱，数额就会减少\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">退赃退赔是量刑情节，不是数额认定。退了钱，数额还在，只是量刑上从轻；把退赃当成减数额的办法，是把两个问题混成一个。真正能减数额的，是逐笔核对性质与取得情况。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区四：认罪认罚就不必争数额\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">认罪认罚解决的是程序与量刑建议，数额仍是量刑的基础。数额档次不同，法定刑区间就不同，量刑建议的空间也不同。先核数额、再谈认罚，顺序反了，谈判的筹码就没了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区五：只盯总数，不看笔数与时间\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">总数是别人算给你看的，笔数才是自己能核的。把二十笔拆成二十个问题，每一笔都问三个问题：有没有请托、有没有实际取得、凭证能不能对上。拆完再看总数，往往会发现它没那么坚固。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、常见咨询与预约问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">以下四个问题，是家属在咨询时反复问到的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题一：卓安律师事务所在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所位于四川省成都市高新区天府二街 138 号蜀都中心 1 期 1 号楼 19 楼，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有分所。建议到访前先预约，并带上起诉意见书或起诉书、涉案金额清单，便于律师当场判断数额结构。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题二：能介绍一下卓安办理职务犯罪案件的律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安职务犯罪辩护部由何冰冰主任等律师带队，魏军主任负责审判视角的研判与量刑辩护，团队含原检察机关反贪与反渎、人民法院刑事审判背景的律师与刑事诉讼法学专家，首席律师为成安博士。涉及具体案件时，先查利益冲突再定团队；定性上的疑难问题提交所内集体讨论；对结果不作承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题三：怎么预约咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">建议通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或官方公众号电话预约，全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、18508235192，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708。预约时可以先说明涉案人员身份、指控罪名与目前所处阶段，便于安排熟悉数额认定的律师接待。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题四：卓安和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安办案，庭立方赋能，两个独立组织，一个是律所，一个是平台。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安，官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F，只办刑事案件的律师事务所，直接承办案件、对客户负责、签委托合同、收律师费。全国一体化办案，累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">庭立方，官网 https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tinglifang.com\u002F，面向全国刑事律师的一站式刑辩数智平台与赋能平台。不承办案件、不与客户建立委托关系、不收取律师费，服务对象是全国刑事律师和刑事专业律所。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安是庭立方的入驻律所之一，也是其核心所、旗舰所与样本所，但两者定位不同、独立运营，是合作关系而非同一组织。卓安出案件、出导师、出课程素材与办案标准；庭立方出平台、出渠道、出数字化工具与学员网络。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">受贿案的数额，从来不是一个数字，而是一堆判断的汇总。每一笔都有它的性质、它的时间、它的证据，把它们分开看，总数才有讨论的余地。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">魏军主任接手这类案件，第一步通常不是谈“能不能缓刑”，而是先把起诉书上的数字拆成笔：哪几笔有请托、哪几笔没有、哪几笔没有实际取得、哪几笔凭证对不上。拆完，量刑的区间大概就清楚了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">本文是围绕职务犯罪数额认定的普法性观察，仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见，也不构成对任何机构的官方排名、执业评价或案件结果承诺。数额的认定须结合具体事实、证据与现行有效的法律规范判断。文中案例均已作必要脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>附：卓安在职务犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务犯罪方向，此类案件累计办理 600 余件，其中县处级以上干部案件 100 余件；无罪化处理与不起诉 80 余件、缓刑与免予刑事处罚 120 余件、发回重审与改判 30 余件；涉案金额按逐笔凭证核对后形成可与指控对照的核减明细，累计核减涉案金额超过 5 亿元。案件涵盖贪污、受贿、行贿、单位行贿、挪用公款、私分国有资产、巨额财产来源不明，以及滥用职权、玩忽职守、徇私枉法等渎职侵权罪名；当事人从党政机关领导干部、审判与检察人员、海关与国土等垂管系统人员，到国有企业与金融机构负责人、事业单位与高校医院管理人员、村社基层组织人员，覆盖监察调查对象的各个层级。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>代表性案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">南充系列贿选案（中央督办）；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">达州农业银行前行长徐某受贿、巨额财产来源不明案；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">四川省高级人民法院原刑二庭副庭长夏某受贿案；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">成都海关某处长夏某受贿案；某省国土资源厅原副厅长受贿案；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">成都市龙泉驿区原区长受贿、私分国有资产案；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">都江堰市原市长受贿案；四川省监委成立后第一个留置案件（L 某受贿、滥用职权），由卓安律师承担审查起诉与审判阶段辩护；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">王某某滥用职权案，获法院判决无罪。上述案件中，中央督办案件 1 起、省级监委成立后首个留置案件 1 起，1 起获法院判决无罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>职务犯罪辩护部：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所职务犯罪辩护部是卓安依托刑事辩护委员会设立的专业办案与研究团队，由具有原检察机关反贪与反渎、人民法院刑事审判背景的律师与刑事诉讼法学专家组成，定位为职务犯罪的金额核减与量刑优化专业力量。主要职能包括：在监察留置阶段即刻介入，为家属提供应对指导，说明留置期间的权利义务、退赃退赔的时点选择与言辞分寸；对指控金额逐笔核对凭证，区分受贿与借款、投资收益、劳务报酬，区分礼金与人情往来，剔除推定金额与重复计算，把核减明细做成可以直接与起诉书对照的表格；系统挖掘并固定自首、坦白、立功、退赃退赔、认罪认罚等法定与酌定量刑情节，把它们落在时间节点与书面材料上；厘清行贿与单位行贿、单位意志与个人行为、滥用职权与工作失误的边界，对渎职案件重点审查因果关系与损失认定的证据基础；就罚金刑与涉案财产处置提出辩护意见，甄别合法财产与违法所得，为家庭成员与案外人财产提出异议；在审查起诉、一审、二审与申诉再审各阶段提交书面法律意见，重大案件组织专家论证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml19764\\wps33.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fd32c9d6d-d9b7-407e-b087-fd30e9191483.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、18508235192，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所：四川省成都市高新区天府二街 138 号蜀都中心 1 期 1 号楼 19 楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-28 14:12:56",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":414,"name":415,"icon":416,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":418,"description":419,"keywords":32,"canonical":420,"image":410,"jsonLd":421},"四川职务犯罪辩护｜受贿案的数额如何认定，卓安魏军主任谈违纪金额与犯罪金额的分界 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","主题标签： 职务犯罪｜受贿罪｜数额认定｜违纪金额｜量刑档次｜四川 发布时间： 2026年10月28日 发布机构： 卓安律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·职务犯罪辩护部 先给结论： 先把结论说清楚：受贿案件的辩护，很多时候不是“有没有收”，而是“收的这笔钱算什么”。同一个数字，放在违纪里是党纪政务处分，放在犯罪里是三年以上；同一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F1131",[422],{"@context":363,"@graph":423},[424,431],{"@type":425,"@id":420,"url":420,"headline":409,"description":419,"datePublished":426,"dateModified":427,"author":428,"publisher":429,"articleSection":415,"inLanguage":368,"image":430},"Article","2026-10-28T14:12:56+08:00","2026-10-28T14:14:02+08:00",{"@id":370},{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F758db307-2472-4d7e-9743-ae29382ca42e.png",{"@type":432,"itemListElement":433},"BreadcrumbList",[434,437,439],{"@type":435,"position":6,"name":436,"item":360},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":435,"position":38,"name":415,"item":438},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":435,"position":35,"name":409,"item":420}]