[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-1140":405},{"entity":4,"seo":357},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":198,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":248,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":300,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":333,"homeStats":334,"serviceProducts":347},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,126,133,141,146,151,159,164,169,173,178,183,188,193],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},730,"W某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪，经过职务犯罪示范庭审，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fc9d55899-8ff3-4fff-bfce-ca2e77948b9c.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控W某利用职务便利，获取特定项目，共同受贿255万余元；通过虚增工程量的方式，共同贪污102万余元。 二、办案过程 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，三轮阅卷后向当事人及家属客观公正地分析了案件情况，同时也与承办人员就","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},729,"某医院原党委书记，贪污、受贿近300万，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在开庭成功争取到了比罚金建议更低的结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F73663c1c-a43a-4df7-8b28-d200b12a1b32.png","一、案情简介 D某原系某医院党委书记，涉嫌贪污132万余元，受贿149万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟",{"id":127,"title":128,"thumbnail":129,"summary":130,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":131,"caseTypeCode":132},728,"Y某涉嫌近200万的生产、销售伪劣产品罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，法院阶段争取到比量刑建议更低的结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F6eba40a6-1952-490c-8b1f-31e3c126d671.png","一、案情简介 这是一起四川公安发布的打击伪劣农资典型案例，当事人涉嫌近200万的 生产、销售伪劣产品罪 。 二、办案过程与办案结果 签署认罪认罚时，当场让检察官变更主意，再降低几个月，给了我当事人全案里最低的量刑建议。 法院开庭时，凭借举证","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},727,"G某涉嫌开设赌场罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，当天成功取保","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fc20dcabc-bc0b-43b5-afdb-b88d93889c55.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人五年前去到柬埔寨某公司任职UI界面设计师，该公司开发擦边软件，软件界面同时接受了赌博网站的广告导流，当事人获利数十万，涉嫌违法犯罪。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属咨询之后，客观公正地分析了案件情况，",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},726,"H某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，从轻处罚并帮家属省下80万","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fae38a2b9-7c5c-4e9f-8b91-0cc1c6e538c1.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控被告人向他人出售公民个人信息，违法所得数额共计为 519715 元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},725,"S某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪，钟灵柔律师为其展开辩护，成功取保并变更为掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，最终获得缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F664ed1f9-935e-483d-aab4-6e458bb5129f.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 和办案结果 这个案件的法检阶段，都超预期地完成了当事人和家属的期待。 审查起诉阶段：在批准",{"id":152,"title":153,"thumbnail":154,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":156,"caseTypeName":157,"caseTypeCode":158},724,"Y某涉嫌抢劫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F6712a84f-37c1-4c10-89b6-6573787864f8.png","一、案情简介 Y某在网上约嫖，在进入卖淫女房间后，将卖淫女殴打至轻伤，抢走其财物后逃离。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":160,"title":161,"thumbnail":162,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":131,"caseTypeCode":132},723,"L某涉嫌强迫交易罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师在公安报捕前成功为其取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F40bf6af8-8be7-4d80-a025-d4938838a27b.png","一、案情简介 L某系拉矿车队人员，由于与矿山承包商签订合同事宜，引起纠纷，参与了三次堵车以及一次上访事件，后被公安以涉嫌 强迫交易罪 刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 接受家属委托后第一时间会见当事人，梳理出两次堵车与上访事件的来龙去脉，后续结合和",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":167,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":131,"caseTypeCode":132},722,"L某涉嫌50万强迫交易罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Ffb77c0f9-6294-4795-863f-644f11d1d3b4.png","一、案例罪名： 强迫交易罪 二、案情简介 办案机关指控我方通过三次堵路，多次信访，使被害单位已签约的公司被迫退出，从而强迫让被害单位与我方签订运输合同，被害单位已给付我方运费50万元。 三、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},721,"S某涉嫌滥用职权罪，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功获得缓刑","一、案情简介 公诉 机关指控，S某在履行工作职责过程中，未严格按照工作要求履行职责，致使一百余户不符合落户政策的人员违规落户，破坏了户籍管理制度和成都区域商品房市场的调控政策。 二、办案过程 在三轮阅卷后，向当事人详细地反馈了案件的有利情况",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},720,"Z某作为网游公司小组长，涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其进行无罪辩护，公安阶段终止侦查，不留案底","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F37dc25e7-1563-4f6f-80cb-3a3fec926fbe.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人作为网游公司小组长，帮助公司实施 开设赌场 的行为。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展沟通工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},719,"C某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F90dc3041-9512-4a3b-a0c7-856587a08015.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人六年前任职的公司，开发的麻将软件和第三方结算软件相接，拉拢赌客进行赌博，公司获利x百万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展沟通工作，客观公正地分析了案件情",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},718,"L某涉嫌境外开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F90dcd643-3b33-4582-a934-beb9039b4bdb.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人多年前前往园区，进入的公司，从事运维工作半年，获利十余万元，涉嫌。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展沟通工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},717,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后仍然成功取保","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F84cc9646-3f5b-4624-b392-d02e53a89c6e.png","一、案情简介 当事人与他人合伙开茶楼，因在茶楼里组织打德州并且还每盘进行抽成，故被侦查机关抓获。 二、办案过程 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，侦查阶段虽批准逮捕，但为案件其他有利情节已打下基础。在检察院审查起诉阶段能够阅卷后，认为指控的违",{"id":194,"title":195,"thumbnail":196,"summary":197,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},716,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在逮捕后最终成功缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002F8b9dc830-73a7-4c2c-bbd8-c31f7ff0771c.png","一、案情简介 当事人作为茶楼股东，在茶楼内组织打德州扑克，抽头获利3万元，被挡获归案。 二、辩护思路 1. 本案茶楼共三名股东，当事人是小股东，目前已全额退赃 2. 本案系在茶楼包间内打德扑抽钱，相较于其他 开设赌场 行为社会危害性更低 3",[199,202,207,210,215,220,223,229],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":200,"keywords":201},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":203,"name":204,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":132,"name":131,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":216,"name":217,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":156,"code":158,"name":157,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":243,"lawyer":247},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[244],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[249,252,265,277,288],{"id":234,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":236,"city":237,"caseType":238,"title":239,"thumbnail":240,"content":10,"publishTime":241,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":242,"lawyers":250},[251],{"id":236,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":242,"position":245,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":246,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":253,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":254,"city":255,"caseType":256,"title":257,"thumbnail":258,"content":10,"publishTime":259,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":260,"lawyers":261},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[262],{"id":254,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":260,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":264,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":266,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":267,"city":268,"caseType":269,"title":270,"thumbnail":271,"content":10,"publishTime":272,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":273,"lawyers":274},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[275],{"id":267,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":273,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":276,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":278,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":279,"city":280,"caseType":238,"title":281,"thumbnail":282,"content":10,"publishTime":283,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":284,"lawyers":285},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[286],{"id":279,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":287,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":289,"createdAt":235,"updatedAt":235,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":290,"city":291,"caseType":292,"title":293,"thumbnail":294,"content":10,"publishTime":295,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":296,"lawyers":297},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[298],{"id":290,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":296,"position":263,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":299,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[335,338,341,344],{"value":336,"label":337},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":339,"label":340},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":342,"label":343},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":345,"label":346},"6","全国分所",[348,351,354],{"title":349,"desc":350},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":352,"desc":353},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":355,"desc":356},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":358,"description":13,"keywords":359,"canonical":360,"image":10,"jsonLd":361},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[362],{"@context":363,"@graph":364},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[365,371],{"@type":366,"@id":367,"url":360,"name":7,"inLanguage":368,"publisher":369},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":372,"@id":370,"name":7,"url":360,"logo":373,"image":373,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":368,"address":374,"geo":377,"department":379},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":376},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":378,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[380,385,389,393,397,401],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":383,"parentOrganization":384},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":386,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":387,"parentOrganization":388},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":390,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":391,"parentOrganization":392},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":394,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":395,"parentOrganization":396},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":398,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":399,"parentOrganization":400},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":402,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":403,"parentOrganization":404},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":370},{"entity":406,"seo":417},{"id":407,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":408,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":409,"thumbnail":410,"content":411,"publishTime":412,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":413},1140,"2026-10-28 16:27:16","公司出钱、老板拍板，行贿为什么最后算到个人头上","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fe6a9eb39-f9f5-4c32-a71a-d66e3605eca9.jpg","\u003Ch2>摘要\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>公司账上出钱、老板拍板办事，案发后却被按个人行贿起诉，这是涉企行贿案件里最常见的落差。很多人到这时才发现，公司有没有真实经营、利润有没有分掉，都会直接决定罪名。\u003Cstrong>单位行贿与个人行贿的差别不在钱从哪个账户出，在两件事：这笔钱体现的是谁的意志，行贿换来的利益归了谁。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 前者要证明决策是单位作出的，后者要证明收益留在公司。任何一环断掉，条文直接指向个人。两条路的刑期差一个量级，代价也不一样：个人重的是刑期，单位重的是公司要一起上被告席。这篇讲清认定标准、三种直接推翻单位认定的情形、哪些事实会把认定拉向个人，以及已经被按个人立案之后还有哪些空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Ch2>一、为什么同样一笔钱，算单位还是算个人差这么远\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）两条路的刑期差了一个量级\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>向国家工作人员送钱，按个人行贿处理，最高可以判到无期徒刑。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑法第三百九十条把行贿罪分成三档：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>一般情形，五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处罚金。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>情节严重，或者使国家利益遭受重大损失，五年以上十年以下，并处罚金。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>情节特别严重，或者使国家利益遭受特别重大损失，十年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑，并处罚金或者没收财产。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>按单位行贿处理，对单位判处罚金，对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员，五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处罚金。\u003Cstrong>上限锁在五年。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同一个行为，两套条文，差的不是一个档位。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还要分清另一条线：向公司、企业人员送钱，走的是对非国家工作人员行贿罪，最高十年，归公安机关侦查；向国家工作人员送钱归监察机关调查。\u003Cstrong>两条线的管辖机关、强制措施、律师能介入的时间点都不同，不能拿一条线的经验去套另一条。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）公司被判罚金之后，事情没有结束\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>单位行贿不是让公司替人扛，公司要单独承担罚金刑，并且以被告单位的身份进入程序。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>后果有三层：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>罚金由公司缴纳，不进个人账户。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>判决书上会出现公司名称，进入公开的裁判文书。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>投标资格、资质年检、银行授信、行业准入，都可能因此受影响。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>第三层的影响往往比罚金本身更大。\u003Cstrong>一家公司被列为被告单位之后，真正的麻烦不在判决那天，在之后每一次投标和年检。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以认定单位行贿对公司更好这句话只说对了一半。\u003Cstrong>对个人是轻的，对公司是重的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）为什么办案机关容易先按个人立案\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>因为送钱的和收钱的都是自然人，而单位意志需要另外取证。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>调查最先固定的是两端：谁送的、谁收的。至于这笔钱是公司决定的还是个人决定的、利润最后落在哪，属于第二层事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>客观上有一家公司，不等于自动按单位犯罪处理。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 主张单位行贿的一方，要拿出证据把这条链补上。补不上，就按个人走。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>二、认定单位行贿看两件事，三种情形直接推翻\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）第一件：这笔钱体现的是谁的意志\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>看决定怎么形成，不看钱从哪个账户出。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四项可核查的事实：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>有没有经营层的集体决定，会议记录、决议、审批单在不在。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>送钱的名义是谁，合同、函件、结算单上写的是公司还是个人。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>经办人是不是以职务身份在办，有没有授权文件。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>财务上怎么处理的，有没有入账、走的什么科目。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>中小企业的难点在于，很多决定确实没有会议记录。可用的替代材料有三类：股东之间的往来邮件与微信、财务付款的签字流程、长期形成的业务惯例。\u003Cstrong>这三类要能用，前提是当时就有，事后补的痕迹反而更糟。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>只有老板一个人知道、账上没有任何痕迹的，单位意志通常认不上。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）第二件：行贿换来的利益归了谁\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这一件比第一件更硬，因为它可以用账目和流水直接证明。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>看三处：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>业务合同签在谁名下。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>货款结算走谁的账户。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>利润最后有没有分到个人。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>这三处查起来并不难，因为都留痕。\u003Cstrong>难的是三处指向不同结论时怎么解释\u003C\u002Fstrong>：合同签在公司、货款进了关联公司、关联公司的股东又是本人，这条链路如何说明，往往决定案子往哪边走。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>利益归属一旦落在个人，前面做得再规范也没有意义。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 条文写得很直接：因行贿取得的违法所得归个人所有的，按行贿罪处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）三种情形直接推翻单位认定\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Col>\u003Cli>个人为实施违法犯罪而设立公司，或者公司设立后以实施犯罪为主要活动。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>盗用单位名义实施，违法所得由个人私分。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>因行贿取得的违法所得归个人所有。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>前两种打的是主体资格，第三种打的是利益归属。\u003Cstrong>实务中第三种出现得最多，也最容易被查实。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 一笔分红、一次借款平账、一份股权代持，都可能成为转折点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>三、哪些事实把认定拉向个人，哪些能拉回来\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）钱从个人卡出，公司事后补账\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>资金来源是最先被查的一环。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>个人账户转出、事后用备用金或者报销冲抵，账面上会留下一条对不上的线。这条线一被拉直，单位意志的说法就很难维持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）决定只有老板一个人知道\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>没有会议记录、没有审批流程、没有第二个人经手。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这种情况在中小企业很普遍，但在认定上等于放弃了单位意志的证据。老板是法定代表人，不代表他的每个决定都是公司决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）利益落在股东个人名下\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>业务签在公司，钱却通过另一家公司收，或者直接进股东个人账户。两种形态最常见：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>关联公司代收，再由关联公司转给股东个人。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>股权代持，名义股东与实际出资人分离，收益通过代持协议流转。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这一处一旦成立，就是条文里那句违法所得归个人所有。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）长期、按比例、多人经手，反而支持单位行贿\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这条和直觉相反，但实务中经常出现。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三种事实会被看作单位安排而非个人起意：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>回扣按固定比例长期支付，有稳定的计算方式。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>经手人不止一个，财务、业务、管理层各有分工。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>公司账上有对应的支出记录，虽然科目做得不实。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>要说明的是，这三条是事后复盘中发现的客观事实，不是可以事前设计的。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 已经发生的，只能按本来面目摆出来；没有发生的，也不存在补做的可能。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>四、已经被按个人行贿立案，还有哪些空间\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）先把主体事实重新摆一遍\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>不是重新讲一遍故事，是把散落在卷宗里的四类材料挑出来重新组合。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>工商登记与股权结构，证明公司真实存在、有多个股东。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>供货或者服务合同，证明业务由公司承接、以公司名义履行。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>结算凭证，证明对方与公司结算，不与个人结算。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>薪酬与分红记录，证明经营者只领取报酬、未私分利润。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这四类材料放在一起，才拼得出单位意志与利益归属的证据体系。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 单独一份合同没有用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）利益归属怎么举证\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>最有力的一组事实是：公司账户有完整经营流水、股东多年未分红、经营者只领固定工资。\u003Cstrong>这三项同时成立，基本可以排除违法所得归个人。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>反过来，如果案发前刚做过一次大额分红或者股权转让，这一组证据的说服力会下降。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）主动交待这条出口，两个罪名不一样\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这是很多人不知道的一处差别。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑法第三百九十条第二款规定，行贿人在被追诉前主动交待行贿行为的，可以从轻或者减轻处罚；犯罪较轻、对侦破重大案件起关键作用或者有重大立功表现的，可以减轻或者免除处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三百九十三条没有这一款。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 单位行贿的责任人没有对应的明文出口，只能走坦白、认罪认罚这些一般规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三层差别值得记住：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>对非国家工作人员行贿，被追诉前主动交待的，可以减轻或者免除处罚，条文没有附加条件。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>行贿罪，被追诉前主动交待的，可以从轻或者减轻；犯罪较轻、对侦破重大案件起关键作用或者有重大立功表现的，才可以减轻或者免除。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>单位行贿罪，条文里没有这一款。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>同样是主动交待，落在哪个罪名上，能换到的东西不一样。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以两条路各有各的代价：个人行贿刑期重，但有法定的从宽出口；单位行贿刑期轻，出口却要另找。\u003Cstrong>这不是一道可以事先挑选的题，是案发后必须面对的结构。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）退赃与合规整改用在哪一步\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Col>\u003Cli>退赃越早越有价值，审查起诉前完成与判决前完成，效果不同。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>认罪认罚要看时点，事实清楚、争议不大的案件，早签比晚签有利。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>合规整改针对的是现存公司，对已经注销的关联公司没有意义；整改能不能被接受，取决于公司是否还在实际经营。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>还有一处程序差别要知道：\u003Cstrong>向公职人员送钱的案件由监察机关调查，留置期间律师不能会见。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这段时间家属能做的是两件事：委托律师提前把法律意见和材料准备好，把公司的经营资料、财务凭证、合同台账整理齐全。移送检察院之后，会见与阅卷才真正开始。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>五、两起案件，同样的送钱，不一样的结果\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>两起均由卓安律师团队办理，信息已脱敏。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 某医疗器械供应商的实际控制人，十余年间以回扣、感谢费名义向多家医院负责人和科室主任送钱，共计五百余万元。监察机关按行贿罪、对非国家工作人员行贿罪移送，认定是自然人犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>辩护从四方面举证：供货合同以公司名义签订；货款与公司结算，不与个人结算；送钱的钱来自公司财务提取的备用金；全部经营收益留在公司账户，股东多年未分红，本人只领固定工资。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>检察机关采纳意见，罪名变更为单位行贿罪，判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金五十万元。\u003Cstrong>这起案件的关键不在辩解，在四组证据能不能互相咬合。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二起。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 三名合伙人共同承接项目，为感谢一名领导干部在项目上的帮助，共同出资二百二十六万元送出。争点同样在于是单位行贿还是个人行贿。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三人之间是合伙关系，出资来自个人，利益也由个人分配。法院未采纳单位行贿的主张，以行贿罪判处其中一人有期徒刑五年六个月，并处罚金五十万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>两起案件的差别不在送钱方式，在有没有一个真实经营、独立核算的单位把业务和收益装进去。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>六、涉及的主要法律依据\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十九条：行贿罪，为谋取不正当利益给予国家工作人员财物；被勒索给予财物且未获不正当利益的，不以行贿论。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十条：行贿罪三档量刑，以及被追诉前主动交待的从轻、减轻规定。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十三条：单位行贿罪，对单位判处罚金，对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员处五年以下；违法所得归个人的按行贿罪处理。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十四条：对非国家工作人员行贿罪，单位犯罪同样实行双罚制。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十三条：非国家工作人员受贿罪，与第一百六十四条形成对合关系。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十五条：受贿罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三十条、第三十一条：单位犯罪的成立条件与双罚制。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（2016年）：行贿数额三万元以上应予追诉，一万元以上不满三万元但有特定情形的同样追诉。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>祁增燕 卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-28 16:26:16",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":414,"name":415,"icon":416,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":418,"description":419,"keywords":32,"canonical":420,"image":410,"jsonLd":421},"公司出钱、老板拍板，行贿为什么最后算到个人头上 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 公司账上出钱、老板拍板办事，案发后却被按个人行贿起诉，这是涉企行贿案件里最常见的落差。很多人到这时才发现，公司有没有真实经营、利润有没有分掉，都会直接决定罪名。 单位行贿与个人行贿的差别不在钱从哪个账户出，在两件事：这笔钱体现的是谁的意志，行贿换来的利益归了谁。 前者要证明决策是单位作出的，后者要证明收益留在公司","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F1140",[422],{"@context":363,"@graph":423},[424,431],{"@type":425,"@id":420,"url":420,"headline":409,"description":419,"datePublished":426,"dateModified":427,"author":428,"publisher":429,"articleSection":415,"inLanguage":368,"image":430},"Article","2026-10-28T16:26:16+08:00","2026-10-28T16:27:16+08:00",{"@id":370},{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F28\u002Fe6a9eb39-f9f5-4c32-a71a-d66e3605eca9.jpg",{"@type":432,"itemListElement":433},"BreadcrumbList",[434,437,439],{"@type":435,"position":6,"name":436,"item":360},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":435,"position":38,"name":415,"item":438},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":435,"position":35,"name":409,"item":420}]