[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-438":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},438,"2026-09-14 18:44:49","员工被卷入企业涉黑大案，卓安律师如何为其争取最低刑期？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002F3cce55cb-8a24-4120-85ea-f7625cbbb3a5.png","\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在扫黑除恶常态化的司法实践中，民营企业在发展早期涉及的经济纠纷与不规范操作，极易被司法机关整体拔高定性为“亦商亦黑”的黑社会性质组织犯罪。一旦企业高管或普通员工被卷入其中，往往面临参加黑社会性质组织罪及多项并罚重罪的指控。在卓安律师事务所办理的孙某涉黑案中，面对全案45名被告人、长达15天的庭前与正式庭审极限拉锯，辩护团队精准切入法理深水区，创造性地运用“期待可能性”与“禁止重复评价”原则，成功阻击了控方的重刑指控逻辑。最终，法院紧贴量刑建议的最低线，判处孙某有期徒刑九年，并大幅核减罚金，在严苛的涉黑重案中为当事人争取到了最为宝贵的从宽裁判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>一、正规房企为何会被指控为“涉黑组织”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">随着经济的快速发展，部分成立于二十世纪初的房地产企业在原始积累与项目开发过程中，往往伴随着复杂的利益冲突与粗放的经营模式。本案当事人孙某（化名C某），自2003年起便在当地某房地产公司任职。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">多年后，该企业因涉嫌刑事犯罪被公安机关立案侦查。公安机关在侦查后认定，该房地产公司董事长涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪。公诉机关在起诉书中严厉指控，该组织披着合法企业的外衣，实质上呈现“亦商亦黑、以黑护商、以商养黑”的运行模式；在进行房地产开发的同时，有组织地实施了大量违法犯罪活动，大肆攫取巨额经济利益，严重破坏了当地的经济与社会生活秩序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在“打财断血、除恶务尽”的高压态势下，孙某作为公司内部具有一定职务的员工，同时也是核心领导者的亲属，被公诉机关直接认定为该涉黑组织的“积极参加者”。其不仅被指控犯有参加黑社会性质组织罪，还因参与了公司早年的暴力冲突及案发后的毁账行为，被叠加指控涉嫌聚众斗殴罪，以及帮助毁灭证据罪、隐匿、故意销毁会计凭证、会计账簿、财务会计报告罪。面临多项重罪指控，孙某可能被判处重刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>二、定性争议：拿死工资的普通员工算“涉黑”成员吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当案件移送审查起诉，长达上千页的卷宗与多达45人的庞大被告人阵容，让孙某的家属陷入了深深的绝望。家属在紧急求助卓安律师事务所时，充满了困惑与不解：“孙某只是在公司上班，拿固定工资，老板指派什么就干什么。案发后因为害怕连累家里人，一时糊涂烧了些账本，怎么就成了黑社会的积极参加者了？”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在司法实务中，企业型黑社会性质组织的认定往往存在着合法经营与违法犯罪相互交织的复杂局面。公诉机关极易将企业内部正常的科层制管理架构（如董事长、总经理、部门经理、普通员工）直接等同于黑社会性质组织的层级架构（如组织者、骨干成员、积极参加者、一般参加者）。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">如果不能从法理上将“企业职务行为”与“涉黑组织行为”进行精准剥离，孙某必将为企业主的所有涉黑犯罪承担严重的连带责任。这不仅意味着漫长的刑期，更意味着其个人合法财产将被作为“黑财”予以彻底剥夺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>三、卓安辩护策略：如何打掉涉黑特征与单项重罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>面对错综复杂的案情与严峻的指控，卓安律师事务所迅速组建了专案辩护团队。在成安律师的统筹分析与指导下，辩护团队没有被控方庞大的证据卷宗所淹没，而是直接切入控方逻辑的薄弱环节，制定了层次分明、极具法理深度的辩护策略。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）打掉聚众斗殴罪：证明冲突系普通经济纠纷而非涉黑暴力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在涉黑案件的定性中，公诉机关往往会挑选一两起暴力程度较高、参与人数较多的案件作为该组织确立非法权威的“标志性事件”。本案中，孙某曾参与的一起聚众斗殴事件便被控方赋予了此种色彩。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">辩护团队在详细阅卷后指出：案涉的聚众斗殴事件，其起因纯粹是由公司在经营过程中的普通经济纠纷（如工程款结算、场地租赁等）所引发。双方的冲突具有偶发性，且并未造成任何人员重伤或死亡的严重后果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">从法理上讲，这种基于具体利益冲突的治安或轻微刑事案件，不具备黑社会性质组织那种为了“称霸一方、无事生非、逞强耍横”而实施暴力的危害性特征。因此，绝对不应将该起轻微的聚众斗殴行为拔高认定为黑社会性质组织成立的“标志性事件”。即便单独对该行为进行刑法评价，孙某的作用亦属轻微，依法完全可以作相对不起诉处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）降格涉黑成员级别：将“积极参加者”辩护为普通员工\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>针对公诉机关指控孙某为涉黑组织“积极参加者”的定性，成安律师指导团队从黑社会性质组织的“四个法定特征”（组织、经济、行为、危害性）入手，进行了逐一解构。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">辩护律师向法庭严密论证：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">其一，涉案的房地产公司及其背后的利益网络，并不完全具备黑社会性质组织严密的“帮规帮纪”与非法控制特征。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">其二，退一万步讲，即便法庭最终认定该涉黑组织成立，在从组织成立至最终瓦解的漫长期间内，孙某的日常工作均属企业常规业务。其并未参与实施该组织核心的、实质性的违法犯罪活动（如强迫交易、敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事等核心涉黑暴力犯罪）。将一个仅参与了偶发冲突与事后掩饰行为的员工认定为“积极参加者”，严重违背了主客观相一致的刑法原则。依法，孙某绝对不应被认定为“积极参加者”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）化解毁灭证据重罪：烧毁自家账本为何不单独定罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">这是本案辩护中最具技术含量、也是最核心的破局点。公诉机关指控孙某在组织领导者（即其亲属兼董事长）到案后，参与销毁了公司的财务账册，以此指控其构成“帮助毁灭证据罪”等妨害司法罪名，并同时将此行为作为其“积极参加黑社会性质组织、维护组织利益”的证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安辩护团队在此引入了刑法学中极具深度的“期待可能性”理论以及“禁止重复评价”原则：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>动机的私人性而非组织性：孙某在案发后参与销毁证据，其根本动机是出于亲属间的情面以及维护自身的安全利益，这是一种人类趋利避害的本能反应，而绝非是为了维护所谓的“黑社会性质组织利益”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>缺乏期待可能性：更为关键的是，孙某销毁的正是本案涉黑指控的相关财务证据。如果公诉机关坚持将孙某定性为该涉黑组织的成员，那么孙某销毁这些证据，实质上就是在销毁“自己作为当事人参与犯罪”的证据。在现代刑法法理中，法律不能强求任何人保留对自己不利的证据以自证其罪，这被称为“缺乏期待可能性”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>禁止重复评价：因此，控方不能一方面以孙某销毁证据为由，认定其属于“参加黑社会性质组织”的积极行为；另一方面，又以同一行为再次单独评价其构成“帮助毁灭证据罪”。这种指控逻辑陷入了自相矛盾的悖论，严重违反了刑法上“禁止对同一犯罪事实进行重复评价”的基本原则。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（四）争取量刑从宽：全面挖掘自首、从犯等减刑情节\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在坚守不构成涉黑相关重罪的无罪\u002F罪轻辩护底线的同时，辩护团队也为法庭量刑提供了充足的下调空间。律师向法庭提出：即便法庭最终认定孙某构罪，其在整个共同犯罪体系中也仅属于“一般参加者”。同时，孙某具备自首、在部分犯罪预备阶段的犯罪中止、在共同犯罪中系从犯，且系初犯、偶犯，到案后坦白认罪态度极好等多个法定与酌定从轻、减轻处罚情节。这些情节必须在最终量刑中予以充分体现。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002F3cce55cb-8a24-4120-85ea-f7625cbbb3a5.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>四、判决结果：成功保住个人财产，刑期降至量刑建议最低线\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑大案的审理往往是一场体能与心智的极限考验。本案共涉及45名被告人，仅前期的庭前会议就足足召开了5天，随后的正式庭审更是长达10天之久才落下帷幕。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在审查起诉阶段，控辩双方就曾经历过激烈的量刑博弈。检察院最初给出的量刑建议带有强烈的施压性质：如果孙某全盘认罪认罚，建议判处9年有期徒刑（并处罚金20万元）；如果不认罪认罚，则建议判处10年6个月。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">到了审判阶段，由于卓安辩护团队在法庭上针对定性与证据展开了极具杀伤力的质证与辩论，检察院感受到了巨大的指控压力，遂将量刑建议调整为“不认罪认罚情况下判处9至11年”。这种区间的拉大，实质上反映了控方对案件事实确信度的动摇。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">面对控方的步步紧逼，卓安辩护团队始终保持冷静克制，据理力争，用严密的证据分析和深厚的法理推演说服合议庭。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>最终，一审法院在综合考量了全案证据与辩护意见后，作出了极为慎重的判决。法院虽然未能彻底剥离所有的涉黑指控，但在具体量刑上，完全采纳了辩护人关于从宽情节的意见，“踩着”检察院量刑建议的最低线，决定对孙某合并执行有期徒刑九年。同时，在财产刑的判处上，法院也听取了辩护人的意见，未实施惩罚性的没收全部财产，而是将罚金大幅度降至13万元。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在严苛的扫黑除恶司法政策下，对于一名被公诉机关重点指控、涉及多项重罪及毁证情节的涉黑案件被告人，能够将刑期牢牢压制在量刑建议的绝对最低线，并大幅保住其个人合法财产，这一判决结果实属不易，也获得了孙某及其家属的高度认可。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>五、企业涉黑案件：高管与员工的风险防范与自救指南\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>在成安律师看来，随着经济犯罪与涉黑涉恶犯罪的界限在特定历史时期变得模糊，许多原本正常的企业员工极易在企业面临刑事危机时沦为“涉黑组织成员”。针对此类风险，卓安律师团队总结了以下核心排查与自救法则：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; line-height: 2;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>危机评估与排查维度\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>企业员工及家属常见认知误区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师客观防范与应对建议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>企业属性与黑社会定性混淆\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">认为公司证照齐全、照章纳税，老板做慈善，绝不可能是黑社会；或者认为只要老板被抓定黑，全体员工全完了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>切断涉黑资金链：律师审查的核心在于，公司的利润是否被有组织地提取出来，专门用于购买作案工具、发放“封口费”、供养违法犯罪人员。如果没有明确的资金输送链，必须坚决打掉“经济特征”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>职务行为与积极参加的界限\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">认为自己只是拿死工资办事，打架、催收都是职务行为，不需要承担刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>厘清职务行为与涉黑犯罪的界限：员工执行明显违法的公司指令（如暴力强拆、非法拘禁债务人），同样构成犯罪。但律师必须从“有无主观恶性”、“是否获取非法提成”等方面，将其辩护为普通共犯或胁从犯，避免升级为“涉黑积极参加者”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>面对侦查与证据固定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案发后恐慌，认为销毁公司账目、电脑数据就能保护自己或公司，或者在讯问时随意猜测、包揽责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>切勿盲目销毁公司账目证据：案发后销毁证据不仅无助于脱罪，反而会直接触发“帮助毁灭证据罪”等新罪名，并被视为掩饰涉黑犯罪的铁证。在面临侦查时，如实陈述自己仅从事常规行政、业务工作是自我保护的最佳防线。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>关于认罪认罚与量刑协商\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">认为只要签了“认罪认罚具结书”就能早点回家，不顾指控事实的严重性盲目签字。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>慎重对待认罪认罚签署：涉黑案件的认罪认罚极度危险。家属必须在审查起诉阶段委托专业刑辩律师对卷宗进行“体检”。只有在律师确认控方证据确实充分、且量刑建议客观合理的情况下，方可考虑签署；否则必须坚决做无罪或罪轻的法理抗辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">回想起本案庭审结束后的那个傍晚，市中级人民法院的门口站满了涉案的45个家庭的数百名家属。一个个焦灼的目光，望向从法院大门缓缓驶出的囚车，仅仅是为了能隔着铁窗看一眼自己的亲人，那样的场景令人动容且震撼。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑案件的辩护，向来是刑事辩护领域中最为漫长、最为艰巨的攀登。它不仅要求辩护律师在海量的卷宗中保持显微镜般的洞察力，在法庭上面对公诉机关的重重施压时保持磐石般的定力，更要求律师具备将枯燥的法理（如禁止重复评价、期待可能性）转化为说服法官的利剑的能力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">不管案件的最终结果如何，在漫长而冰冷的诉讼程序中，专业的刑事律师必须作为一道屏障，让公权力在法定的轨道内行使，剥除一切不当拔高的重刑指控。这不仅是对当事人和家属付出的最高回应，更是让身陷囹圄的个体在绝境中，真切地看到依法辩护的力量，感受到法治应有的温度与希望。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-14 18:41:27",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"员工被卷入企业涉黑大案，卓安律师如何为其争取最低刑期？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 在扫黑除恶常态化的司法实践中，民营企业在发展早期涉及的经济纠纷与不规范操作，极易被司法机关整体拔高定性为“亦商亦黑”的黑社会性质组织犯罪。一旦企业高管或普通员工被卷入其中，往往面临参加黑社会性质组织罪及多项并罚重罪的指控。在卓安律师事务所办理的孙某涉黑案中，面对全案45名被告人、长达15天的庭前与正式庭审极限","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F438",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-09-14T18:41:27+08:00","2026-09-14T18:44:49+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002F3cce55cb-8a24-4120-85ea-f7625cbbb3a5.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]