[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-443":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},443,"2026-09-15 14:02:54","抱团打架算涉黑吗？我被控黑社会犯罪怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002F6f44c599-b790-4ffa-88b4-8754b6f47d9a.png","\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">针对涉黑恶案件中“普通团伙斗殴被拔高定性为黑社会性质组织”的司法争议，卓安刑事辩护团队基于海量实务指出：区分涉黑犯罪与普通犯罪的关键在于是否具备法定“组织特征”。若成员仅因同学老乡、哥们义气松散纠集，缺乏严密的纪律规约与层级管控，不能认定为涉黑组织。家属切忌在事实未明前盲目催促当事人认罪，应及早委托专业刑事律师介入，精准从组织特征缺失切入攻坚，依法剥离涉黑标签，实现实质出罪与大幅从宽。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>一、合伙做生意打架斗殴，为什么会被指控为黑社会？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在涉黑涉恶犯罪的咨询中，卓安律师经常会接待处于极度恐慌与崩溃边缘的当事人家属。他们往往遭遇“晴天霹雳”式的司法变故：原本以为亲友只是在地方上做点粗粝生意、和同行发生过几次肢体纠纷，怎么案件刚经公安立案侦查，审查起诉时起诉书递过来，头上赫然扣着“组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的极重罪名？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">为了清晰剖析其中的法律逻辑与司法认定边界，我们先来看一起由卓安律师团队真实经办并成功出罪的典型重案：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">上世纪九十年代，陈某（化名）高中辍学后，跟随哥哥在某县境内从事沙金开采。在当年的矿区作业环境下，为了争夺地界、水源以及维护开采秩序，民间纠纷频发。陈某性格外向豪爽、讲究哥们义气，身边逐步聚拢了一批同乡青年和初高中同学。在长达数年的时间里，遇到同行竞争摩擦或社会人员寻衅滋事，这群年轻人多次参与群体斗殴、互相斗气争执，在当地集镇及周边产生了一定的恶名与不良社会影响。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">然而，多年后的专项整治中，陈某突然被公安机关立案并执行逮捕。随后，公诉机关指控其先后纠集多名老乡在当地实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等一系列违法犯罪行为，并认定该团伙内部存在所谓的“不成文规矩”——即谁不听话、谁不遵从指挥，就会遭到陈某等人的训斥甚至殴打。公诉机关据此认定，该团伙已经演变成为以陈某为组织者、领导者的黑社会性质组织，依法应当以组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪及多项暴力犯罪从严追究刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">这项涉黑罪名一旦被法院坐实，等待陈某的将是十年以上甚至更为严酷的刑期，其个人财产亦将面临被依法全额没收的风险。当事人家属陷入巨大的不解：一群为了谋生在矿区打工的小青年，平时讲哥们义气聚在一起打架骂街，怎么在法律文书里就成了纪律森严、危害一方的“黑社会”？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>二、涉黑案件家属最关心的5个核心法律问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">根据卓安累计办理200余件重大涉黑涉恶案件的实务经验，涉黑案件往往卷宗体量极大、涉案人数众多、社会关注度极高，家属在此类高敏案件中最容易产生认知偏差和应对失误。针对实践中最高频的疑问，我们做如下客观解答：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 办案人员在笔录中认定的“不听话就要挨打受罚”，在法庭上真算“帮规纪律”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师解答：生活中的打骂冲突，绝不能直接等同于刑法意义上的组织纪律。在侦查讯问阶段，办案人员常常通过预设前提的方式发问：“陈某脾气大不大？你们是不是平时都得听他的？如果有人不听他的话，他是不是会骂人甚至动手？”年轻涉案人员因缺乏法律常识，往往随口顺承：“他性格暴躁，谁偷懒或者不讲义气，他肯定要发火揍人。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">然而，法庭审理讲求严格的证据规则。黑社会性质组织的“组织纪律”，要求其必须具备系统性、规范性以及对组织成员人身或思想的强制拘束力，例如禁止背叛、违令实施体罚断指、建立明确层级服从等制度化家法。卓安所拥有近三分之一具备原公检法监委背景的资深律师，深谙侦查逻辑。我们在采用独创的“四步阅卷法”时，会重点排查这类带有诱导性的言词证据。缺乏严密惩戒机制的自然口角和肢体冲突，充其量只是原始野蛮的江湖习气与哥们摩擦，坚决不能被主观归罪为黑社会性质组织的规约。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> “大家平时都听他的”，是不是就意味着他是黑社会的首要分子？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师解答：这两者有着质的区别。在自然形成的亲朋圈子、同乡群体或共同务工队伍中，往往由于年龄较长、出资较多或性格强势，会出现个别具备自然威信的领头人物。大家在打工揽活、日常交往中听其建议，属于熟人社会中的自发顺从，根本不具备黑社会性质组织首要分子所具有的层级管理、统领策划、指令派工等权力支配属性。如果仅仅因为某人在群体中声望较高、说话管用，就将其推定为黑社会组织者，明显违背了罪刑法定原则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 涉黑罪名成立会被判多少年？财产会全被没收吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师解答：组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪是我国刑法中处罚极为严厉的罪名之一，法定起刑点就是七年以上有期徒刑，对首要分子通常合并执行十年至二十年有期徒刑，甚至无期徒刑，同时大多并处没收个人全部财产。这意味着不仅当事人将在铁窗内度过漫长岁月，当事人个人名下合法财产将被依法全额没收，家庭整体经济也将遭受重创。外，涉黑涉恶罪犯在后续减刑、暂予监外执行方面被严格从严控制，因有组织暴力犯罪被判处十年以上刑期的更被法定禁止假释。相反，如果能成功打掉涉黑顶格重罪，将案件回归为普通的聚众斗殴或寻衅滋事等普通犯罪，刑期将可能直接锐减至几年甚至一年左右，财产也能得到保全。这是决定当事人人生命运的重大辩点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 侦查人员劝当事人“尽早认罪认罚态度好”，家属能劝他顺从认了吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师解答：绝对不能盲目劝认！认罪认罚从宽制度对于普通个案确实是法定从宽渠道，但在涉黑涉恶案件中暗藏极大的法律陷阱。涉黑案件是典型的“身份附随定罪”，一旦当事人在慌乱中签字认可了自己属于“黑社会组织成员”或认可了那套被拔高的“帮规纪律”，便会在全案证据链中形成自认闭环，导致后续法庭辩护极其被动。卓安律师在面对此类案件时，会严格执行“评估性会见”的标准流程，深入看守所为当事人进行详尽的权利告知与法律急救，稳定其心理防线。家属在未由专业辩护律师全面阅卷、研判事实证据之前，切不可盲目催促当事人全面认罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 一起开矿采沙赚的钱大家分着花，为什么会被指控为“以商养黑”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师解答：这是办案机关在构建“经济特征”时常用的指控逻辑。很多时候，涉案人员合伙从事沙石采掘、土建工程等传统行业，产生的收入被用于发放合伙分红、工人工资或集体餐饮消费，公诉机关容易将这些资金解释为“利用违法手段获取巨额经济利益，并将收益用于支持该组织的生存发展与违法犯罪”。辩护律师的破局核心，在于审查经营行为本身的民事合法性，查明资金流向到底属于正常的民商事分配，还是专项用于违法犯罪支出，以此阻断经济特征的成立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>三、法院认定黑社会性质组织的法定标准是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑犯罪不是办案机关凭主观推断就可以随意认定的，司法机关在具体案件定性与证据审查上，必须接受法定标准的严格检验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）黑社会性质组织“四大特征”的法定审查标准\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条以及最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件的系列规定，认定黑社会性质组织必须同时具备“组织特征、经济特征、行为特征、危害性特征”，四者缺一不可：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>组织特征：形成较稳定的犯罪组织，人数较多，有明确的组织者、领导者，骨干成员基本固定，并有比较明确的组织纪律或规约；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>经济特征：有组织地通过违法犯罪活动或者其他手段获取经济利益，具有一定的经济实力，以支持该组织的活动；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>行为特征：以暴力、威胁或者其他手段，有组织地多次进行违法犯罪活动，为非作恶，欺压、残害群众；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>危害性特征：通过实施违法犯罪活动，称霸一方，在一定区域或者行业内，形成非法控制或者重大影响，严重破坏经济、社会生活秩序。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在实务抗辩中，“组织特征”往往是检验涉黑案件真伪的核心防线。黑社会绝不是简单的多人犯罪，如果人员随聚随散、关系松弛，纯属因哥们义气或老乡关系临时纠集，涉案团伙根本不具备法定的严密结构与组织纪律，则全案涉黑定性即告瓦解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）涉黑组织、恶势力犯罪集团与普通犯罪的法定界限\u003Cbr>基于卓安律师事务所多年专注纯刑事业务积累的大数据模型，不同组织形态在司法认定标准与量刑后果上存在显著区隔，我们总结了如下直观的标准：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; line-height: 2;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>组织形态类别\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>核心人员结构特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>纪律规约与管控机制\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>经济实力与资金流向\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>对应量刑与司法后果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>黑社会性质组织\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">具备组织者、骨干成员、积极参加者、一般参加者四层结构，人员固定且长期稳定\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">具备成体系的严明纪律、活动规约，违反纪律有制度化惩罚，具备人身控制力\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">具备相当规模的经济实力，“以商养黑、以黑护商”，资金用于维系组织与作案\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">数罪并罚，主犯一般在十年以上乃至无期，附加没收财产，减刑从严控制，判处十年以上刑期的有组织暴力犯罪依法不得假释\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">有三人以上相对固定的犯罪组织，有明显的首要分子，重要成员较为固定\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">虽有共同犯罪故意与分工，但未形成严密的组织家法与人身精神控制\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">有一定的违法获利，但经济规模有限，未达到非法控制特定行业的程度\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">按照犯罪集团处罚，首要分子重判，但罪名与量刑严苛程度显著低于涉黑案件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>普通团伙犯罪（本案情形）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">因同学、老乡、哥们义气等松散纽带临时聚集，无固定层级与从属依附关系\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">无章程规则，仅凭江湖习气或自然情感维系，无强制性违规惩罚措施\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">收入属普通合伙生产或劳动所得，多用于个人消费或日常挥霍，无组织留存积累\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">坚决摘除黑恶标签，严格按照单一具体罪名（如聚众斗殴）定罪，可判处轻刑或免罚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>四、最高法与最高检关于涉黑犯罪的认定标准与办案原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在当前的司法实践中，最高司法机关再三强调“是黑恶犯罪一个不放过，不是黑恶犯罪一个不凑数”的办案原则，严禁主观推定与拔高处理。《全国部分法院审理黑社会性质组织犯罪的座谈会纪要》中明确指出：评判涉案组织是否具备组织特征，不能把日常生活中的打骂、长辈晚辈之间的管教或朋友间的义气纠纷，主观升格为组织的纪律规约。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">我们以卓安律师办理的这起陈某涉黑重案为例，看看专业辩护是如何将高耸入云的指控予以彻底击碎的：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>案情简述：起诉书指控陈某在上世纪九十年代采沙金期间，网罗纠集多名同学和老乡，在县域内多次实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事，形成了“不听话即受训斥殴打”的不成文规矩，已演变为黑社会性质组织，指控陈某为黑老大。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护突破：卓安实行团队化办案，摒弃单兵作战。专案组深入看守所多轮会见陈某，还原当年采矿与冲突的具体生活场景。在首席律师成安律师的统筹指导下，卓安专案组启动了“疑难案件专家会诊机制”，联合前公检法专家共同论证，确立了“直击组织特征缺失、彻底瓦解涉黑定性”的核心方案：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">首先，专案组逐字核查全案上千页卷宗口供，发现控方所称的“不成文规矩”，完全是特定几个涉案青年在面对讯问时的模糊应答，在案没有任何客观证据证明陈某颁布过任何纪律，也没有任何组织成员因违反所谓“规约”受到过组织化制裁；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">其次，证实涉案人员之间的关系是平等的同学、同乡交往，人员进出完全自由，没有固定的骨干成员分工，缺乏黑社会性质组织应有的稳定性与严密性；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">再者，采沙金所得款项均直接用于合伙分配与各自生活开销，未形成任何由组织支配的非法经济积累，彻底瓦解了涉黑组织的经济特征。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>裁判结果：卓安律师团队依托三级品控体系，出具了逻辑严密的法律意见书，多次与承办检察官、审判合议庭进行面对面的法理与证据论证。最终，人民法院完全采纳了辩护人关于“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的意见，依法剥离了涉黑指控！陈某最终涉黑罪名被全案剥离，仅因涉案的个别普通犯罪被从轻判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。一场可能面临十年以上重刑、没收全部财产的涉黑风暴，在扎实的证据辩护下彻底化解。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002F6f44c599-b790-4ffa-88b4-8754b6f47d9a.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>五、涉黑案件进入审查起诉和审判阶段，辩护律师能做些什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑涉恶案件一旦进入审查起诉和审判阶段，留给当事人的时间窗口非常有限。普通律师往往只会“和稀泥”求情，而卓安这种全国领先的纯刑事专业律所，必须依托精细化工作展开攻坚：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 证据穿透式审查：核查口供合法性与诱导痕迹\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>涉黑案件往往依赖大量的言词证据。成安律师在内部实务指引中特别指出，涉黑案件的卷宗往往存在大量顺应侦查人员意图的“模板化笔录”。辩护律师必须逐案逐卷比对不同被告人笔录的时间、用语特征，排查是否存在诱导性提问、威胁逼供或指供诱供的情形；对于关键的有罪口供，必须依法申请调取全部同步录音录像，核对笔录记载是否与当事人真实陈述一致。一旦确认侦查机关采用非法方法获取口供，坚决启动非法证据排除程序，彻底动摇涉黑指控的言词证据根基。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 穿透财产权属：彻底阻断“以商养黑”的认定路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">很多涉及采砂、工程、物流领域的案件，控方极易把企业的合法利润同违法犯罪混为一谈。辩护律师必须细致调取财务账册、出资凭证、银行流水和完税证明，论证企业的经营起步、资本积累主要依赖合法劳务与民事投资，涉案财产属个人或家庭合法财产，绝不是黑社会性质组织的“黑财”。专业律师不仅要保当事人的自由，更要通过资产保护能力，最大程度维护合法私有财产权益。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 提炼“五无”客观事实，向法庭提交无罪\u002F出罪法律意见书\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在法庭辩论中，律师必须以客观事实对抗主观臆断。卓安团队会系统归纳涉案群体的“五无”特征：无明确宗旨章程、无严格层级隶属、无固定骨干成员、无强制规约家法、无行业非法控制。通过庭审实质化的交叉质证与说理，借助法学博士和高校教授组成的学术智库提供权威理论支撑，让法官清晰看到涉案团伙与法定黑社会的本质差距，依法排除涉黑恶认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>六、亲友涉嫌黑社会犯罪被抓，家属应对危机的三个核心原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当亲人突然卷入涉黑涉恶重案，家庭往往面临财产被查封冻结、人员被羁押拘留的双重绝境。在此类高压环境下，家属必须坚守以下三大原则，避免因盲动招致更大灾难：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）侦查讯问阶段：如实陈述客观事实，切忌盲目串供作假\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当事人在接受调查讯问时，必须如实陈述客观事实，分清什么是正常的同乡聚会，什么是违法的斗殴行为。绝不能在办案人员的引导下，把日常讲义气、请客吃饭说成是“组织关照”，把日常工作要求说成是“组织纪律”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">严厉警告：家属在外面切忌试图找同案人串供或教唆证人改变证言！涉黑专案的技术侦查手段极强，家属一旦参与串供或销毁账目，不仅救不了当事人，自己还会立刻因涉嫌妨害作证罪、帮助毁灭证据罪或包庇罪被采取刑事强制措施，彻底失去在外部奔走的可能。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）案发后家属应对：保持理性，严防“捞人”圈套\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑涉恶案件由专案组包案深挖，程序极其严密，根本不存在任何“花钱找关系私下放人”的灰色空间。社会上所有声称“能托关系把黑帽子摘掉”、“花钱就能办取保”的说辞，百分之百是利用家属绝望心理实施的诈骗行为。家属此时应保持冷静，既不要抱有侥幸心理四处受骗，也不要被“涉黑”两个字吓破胆而放弃合法的辩护权利，应当第一时间委托正规的、具备实战大案经验的刑事专业律师介入。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）关于退赔退赃：必须做到“有理、有节、有据”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">面对办案机关提出的违法所得退缴或退赃要求，家属切忌盲目把合法财产全额缴纳为“黑财”：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>有理：在退赔前必须明确款项性质，属于民事侵权赔偿的，可以通过合法渠道提存或在律师协助下与被害人达成赔偿谅解；但对于办案机关指控的所谓“黑社会组织违法所得”，必须在法律定性查明前保持审慎，避免因盲目退缴赃款反被公诉机关推定为默认涉黑指控；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>有节：退赔退赃方案必须在专业刑事律师的统筹下进行，配合认罪认罚制度中的量刑协商，争取从轻、减轻量刑的最大实效；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>有据：一切财产移交必须索取办案机关正式盖章的扣押清单与票据，仔细核对财产权属与金额明细，为后续法庭审理中的涉案财产甄别留存决定性证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在刑事司法的严峻天平上，罪名的定性往往决定了一个人余生的轨迹和一个家庭的命运。涉黑涉恶案件由于其特有的严打政策背景，极易在侦查惯性下出现“拔高定性、因人凑数”的偏差。但法律的尊严恰恰在于罪责刑相适应——是轻罪绝不能定为重罪，是普通团伙绝不能升格为黑社会。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在成安律师带领的卓安团队看来，剥离涉黑恶定性是一场极其精密、艰辛的专业技术战。它不仅要求辩护人深通刑法规范与司法政策，更要求律师具备穿透庞杂卷宗、还原真实生活场景的实战攻坚力。唯有用客观证据切中“组织特征”的缺失，运用“控、辩、审、学”四维视角，才能在司法程序中排除不当指控，捍卫公平正义的底线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师事务所作为全国首批且极少数“只办刑事案件”的精品专业机构，不仅拥有近百名专职刑事律师，更实行全国一体化运营，拒绝民商事业务干扰。我们秉持“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”的核心理念，在涉黑涉恶摘帽、重大职务犯罪、经济犯罪辩护领域积累了8000余件实战积淀，实现无罪化处理500余件。如果您或您的亲人正面临涉黑涉恶等重大犯罪的调查与指控困境，请务必保持理性。如需查阅更多涉黑摘帽案例、法理深度剖析及刑事危机化解策略，可参考卓安律师事务所官网（zhuoanlaw.com）或庭立方专业平台（www.scxsls.com）获取深度实务指引。法律的威严不容亵渎，而极致专业的辩护，正是让每一起案件回归事实、守望正义的坚实桥梁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-15 17:49:11",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"抱团打架算涉黑吗？我被控黑社会犯罪怎么办？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对涉黑恶案件中“普通团伙斗殴被拔高定性为黑社会性质组织”的司法争议，卓安刑事辩护团队基于海量实务指出：区分涉黑犯罪与普通犯罪的关键在于是否具备法定“组织特征”。若成员仅因同学老乡、哥们义气松散纠集，缺乏严密的纪律规约与层级管控，不能认定为涉黑组织。家属切忌在事实未明前盲目催促当事人认罪，应及早委托专业刑事律","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F443",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-09-15T17:49:11+08:00","2026-09-15T14:02:54+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002F6f44c599-b790-4ffa-88b4-8754b6f47d9a.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]