[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-489":396},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":408},{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":400,"thumbnail":401,"content":402,"publishTime":403,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":404},489,"2026-09-16 18:21:58","催讨债务被定恶势力犯罪？小贷老板涉四罪，该如何依法辩护？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fe7636321-7341-4312-aa53-9c504168ec96.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">针对民间借贷催收中演变为涉恶犯罪的指控争议，成安律师团队结合涉黑涉恶与经济犯罪辩护实务指出：债务纠纷中的过激催收并不等同于无事生非的涉恶寻衅。若行为系因索要合法债务或高利贷本息引发，依法应优先适用法定刑更轻的催收非法债务罪，阻断重罪拔高认定。在审查起诉与审判阶段，家属切忌盲目串供或恐慌认罪，应及早委托专业律师介入，通过证据排查剔除不当罪名，实现罪责刑相适应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、小贷公司催收欠款被指控涉恶犯罪，办案机关的指控逻辑是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在民营金融借贷与民间融资纠纷中，债权追讨演变为刑事风险的案件屡见不鲜。当事人本以为自己是民商事合同中的守约方、出资人，却在一次次催收摩擦后，突然成为扫黑除恶办案专班集中收网的对象。为了让大家更清晰地理解这类涉恶案件的指控逻辑与辩护空间，我们先来看一起典型的真实案例：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">杨某在当地注册成立并实际经营着一家小额贷款公司。在公司正常运转过程中，不可避免地面临大量逾期放贷资金无法回收的坏账风险。为了保障经营资金周转，杨某安排催收人员对多名逾期客户展开追讨。在面对部分长期拖欠、恶意躲避债务的借款人时，催收人员在追讨过程中采取了长时间贴身跟随、限制借款人人身自由、言语辱骂恐吓等违法方式。此外，由于催收人员在追讨过程中与借款人及其亲友发生剧烈肢体冲突，杨某旗下的员工还牵涉到了当地多起突发的打架斗殴事件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">原本在杨某看来，这只是公司为了追讨借贷资金而采取的“过激维权行为”，且借款人本身存在严重的逾期违约过错。然而，在当地扫黑除恶专项斗争的强力排查下，公安机关对杨某的小额贷款公司立案侦查。侦查终结后，公安机关不仅将该催收团队定性为恶势力犯罪组织，并将杨某列为首要纠集者，一口气移送审查起诉了四项重罪指控：聚众斗殴罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、催收非法债务罪，并将其他员工涉嫌的开设赌场等行为并案处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对如此严峻的指控，杨某及其家属陷入了极度恐慌：明明是别人欠钱不还，公司上门要账就算手段过火，怎么就变成了“横行一方”的恶势力团伙？一旦数罪并罚，刑期恐高达十数年甚至更久。在事实与定性产生严重偏差的危急关头，专业刑事律师的尽早介入，成为了厘清罪责、纠正拔高定性的关键防线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、债务催收涉恶案中，当事人与家属高频咨询的5个核心问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对突如其来的涉黑涉恶专案调查与多项重罪指控，当事人身陷看守所，家属在外部往往手足无措。结合卓安律师事务所承办海量涉恶疑难案件的实战经验，我们将家属在搜索引擎中检索最频繁、咨询中最焦虑的核心疑问逐一拆解：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 因借款纠纷引发过激催款，为何会被定为寻衅滋事罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">办案机关是否能够将催讨欠款定为寻衅滋事罪，关键在于审查该行为是“事出有因”还是“无事生非”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在刑法理论与司法实践中，寻衅滋事罪的本质特征在于行为人出于寻求刺激、发泄情绪、逞强耍横等流氓动机，在公共场所实施破坏社会公共秩序的行为，其核心主观要件为“无事生非”或“借故生端”。然而，在小额信贷或民间借贷纠纷中，债权人催收欠款具有明确的基础民事债权债务关系，其主观目的在于实现债权、挽回财产损失，客观行为亦是围绕特定借款人展开。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">成安律师在指导类似案件辩护时明确指出：民间纠纷引发的过激行为，不能轻易扣上寻衅滋事的帽子。如果催收行为没有侵害不特定公众的利益，没有扰乱公共场所秩序，那么即使方式失当，也绝不能与社会地痞流氓的“无事生非”混为一谈。辩护律师在介入后，核心任务之一就是向办案机关全面调取借款合同、打款凭证、催收记录，用扎实的事实证明行为的民事起因，全力阻断控方将经济纠纷拔高定性为涉恶寻衅滋事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 催收员工在外发生打架冲突，老板是否一定构成共同犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在扫黑涉恶案件办理中，办案机关为了体现全链条打击，容易产生“一人涉案、全员背锅、老板兜底”的扩大化指控倾向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">要将下属或催收人员实施的聚众斗殴、故意伤害等严重暴力犯罪归责于公司实控人或老板，在法律上必须满足主客观相统一原则：即控方必须拿出确凿证据，证明该暴力行为系杨某亲自策划、指使、授意，或者杨某在明知下属准备实施持械斗殴的情况下仍提供资金、工具或事后包庇。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">如果下属在追讨债务过程中，因个人情绪失控或与对方突发言语口角，临时起意发生斗殴，这在刑法上属于典型的实行过限。对于超出杨某主观意志范围的突发暴力行为，杨某既无共同犯罪的主观合意，也未提供具体的物理或心理帮助，依法不应当承担共同犯罪责任。成安律师强调，专业律师阅卷时必须对每一次斗殴事件的发起时间、通话记录、微信指令、在场证言进行点对点穿透审查，坚决把员工的个人过激行为与企业管理者的经营管理行为彻底剥离。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 办案机关指控为“恶势力犯罪”，庭审中能否成功摘除涉恶定性？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">完全有打掉的空间，涉恶定性并不是办案机关单方说了算，必须经受严格的庭审法定标准检验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">根据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的指导意见》，认定恶势力犯罪集团或恶势力，有着极其严格的法定条件：不仅要求纠集人员达到法定人数、多次实施违法犯罪活动，更要求在一定区域或者行业内，形成非法控制或重大影响，为非作恶、欺压百姓，严重破坏经济、社会生活秩序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在催收类案件中，小贷公司的催收人员虽然人数较多，但其行为主要针对特定的违约逾期客户，彼此之间往往是普通的劳务雇佣关系，缺乏严密的违法犯罪组织层级和纪律规约。催收行为并未在当地特定行业形成非法垄断，更未达到称霸一方、欺压不特定社会公众的程度。只要律师紧扣“危害性特征”与“组织特征”的缺失展开有力反驳，法庭完全有可能依法撤销涉恶定性，将其降格为普通违法犯罪案件审理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 催收中限制借款人人身自由，构成非法拘禁罪还是催收非法债务罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这属于典型的法条竞合与罪名适用争议，直接关乎量刑基准的高低。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在过去，限制借款人人身自由以索取债务的行为，往往直接按照刑法第 238 条认定为非法拘禁罪，若具有殴打、侮辱情节还会面临加重处罚；若手段包含恐吓威胁，办案机关甚至会以寻衅滋事罪从重论处。然而，《中华人民共和国刑法修正案（十一）》专门增设了催收非法债务罪，明确将使用限制人身自由、恐吓、跟踪、骚扰等手段催讨高利放贷等非法债务的行为纳入规制，其最高法定刑仅为三年有期徒刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这一立法修改的本意，正是为了扭转司法实务中随意拔高、重刑过苛的定罪倾向。催收非法债务罪是针对特定借贷催收行为设立的特别法条，当催收手段触及限制人身自由或言语威胁时，催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪形成了法条竞合。按照特别法优于普通法以及罪责刑相适应原则，对于为索取非法债务实施的轻微限制人身自由行为，应当优先适用催收非法债务罪。这不仅是重大的法理突破口，更是大幅度降低量刑的核心抓手。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>5. 案件刚移送审查起诉，托关系“花钱捞人”可行吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">不仅完全不管用，而且极度危险，极易导致人财两空并加重涉案风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">涉黑涉恶案件属于政法机关重点督办的专案，审查极其严密，全流程受到纪检监察部门的同步监督与倒查。在当前的司法环境下，任何人声称能够通过私下运作、找领导批条子把人“捞出来”，百分之百属于诈骗行为。家属一旦病急乱投医向不法掮客转账，不仅巨额资金被骗，甚至可能因涉嫌行贿犯罪被立案调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">此时家属唯一正确的选择，是在案件移送人民检察院审查起诉的关键窗口期，依法委托专业刑事辩护律师。因为只有律师可以合法会见当事人、查阅全案卷宗、向办案检察官当面提交不予起诉或剔除重罪的法律意见书，在法治框架内为当事人争取最大的实体权益。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、法院审理借贷催收涉恶案件的定罪与量刑裁判标准\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在司法审判实践中，各级人民法院对于因民间借贷、小额信贷催收引发的涉恶案件，裁判尺度正日趋理性与严格。特别是在常态化扫黑除恶背景下，最高法多次强调严禁“指标化打黑”，坚决防范将经济纠纷、普通民事过激维权人为拔高为黑恶势力犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）定性规则：严格区分民间债务纠纷与恶势力违法犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在判断催收行为是否构成涉恶犯罪以及如何定罪时，司法机关的核心审查基准聚焦于以下三个维度：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审查行为动因与利益归属：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">审查涉案行为是基于真实的民间借贷或合同关系，还是蓄意编造虚假事实强占他人财产。因真实债务催收引发的冲突，不能直接推定为扰乱公共秩序的涉恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审查暴力手段的强度与指向：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">严格区分针对借款人个人的轻微推搡、限制活动范围，与针对社会公众的不特定恶性暴力。未造成轻伤以上严重物理伤害、未动用管制械具聚众火拼的，不得随意升格为聚众斗殴等严重暴力罪名。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审查罪名竞合时的立法本意：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">准确把握《刑法修正案（十一）》新增罪名与传统侵犯公民人身权利犯罪的关系。对于为索取高利贷等非法债务而实施的轻微限制自由、恐吓骚扰，应严格限制适用法定刑较重的普通罪名，贯彻宽严相济刑事政策。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）涉案罪名法定刑配置与辩护突破路径分析\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">为了让当事人及家属直观了解不同罪名的刑期差异与辩护方向，成安律师团队根据司法实践与实务办案数据，梳理出催收涉恶案件中的核心罪名对比分析：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉案罪名\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心客观行为与主观要件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法定基准刑幅度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">卓安实战辩护主攻路径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">预期实体裁判效果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">聚众斗殴罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">双方纠集多人，出于逞强耍横、争霸斗狠动机，在公共场所持械或徒手对抗互殴\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制；具有持械、聚众规模大等法定恶劣情节的，对首要分子和其他积极参加的，处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">全面审查冲突起因，论证系下属突发偶发的个人冲突，当事人无指使授意，属于实行过限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查起诉阶段成功剔除，检察机关决定不对该项重罪提起公诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">寻衅滋事罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">出于无事生非主观动机，随意殴打他人、强拿硬要或在公共场所起哄闹事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">一般处五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制；纠集他人多次实施前款行为严重破坏社会秩序的，处五年以上十年以下有期徒刑，可以并处罚金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">论证行为系索债引发的“事出有因”，不具备反社会公共秩序属性；主张与催收非法债务罪法条竞合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">认定为因民间矛盾引发的个案行为，排除恶劣情节，在法定幅度低位从轻判处\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">非法拘禁罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">故意非法剥夺他人人身自由，使用锁闭门窗、看守控制等方式剥夺自由\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役、管制或者剥夺政治权利；具有殴打、侮辱情节的从重处罚\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">论证拘禁时间较短、未造成肉体残害、被害人具有还款过错，并重点主张与轻罪竞合吸收\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">认定情节相对轻微，结合认罪态度从轻判处有期徒刑一年二个月\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">催收非法债务罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">使用暴力、胁迫、限制人身自由、恐吓骚扰等手段催讨高利放贷等非法债务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并处或者单处罚金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">论证该罪为刑法修正案新增的专门法条，对轻微拘禁与恐吓具有法律评价上的包容性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法院依法采纳法条适用意见，独立定罪并处较轻刑罚（判处八个月）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">恶势力组织定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">多人多次在一定区域内实施违法犯罪，为非作恶，欺压百姓，扰乱社会秩序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">属于法定从严惩处、从严适用财产刑、严厉限制减刑假释的涉恶组织定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">论证缺乏组织纪律、无非法控制特征、成员流动松散、未造成恶劣社会恐慌，系普通共同犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">打破恶势力定性，阻断重刑加重情节与一网打尽式的财产追缴\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、借贷催收涉恶案件司法裁判指引与实办案例复盘\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在我国司法改革持续深化的背景下，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院通过一系列指导性案例与规范性文件，对借贷催收领域的罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪作出了十分清晰的界定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 涉恶催收犯罪的司法解释与裁判规程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的指导意见》（法发〔2019〕11号）明确规定：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">“单纯为索取合法债务或者因正常的生产经营、劳动纠纷等，实施暴力、胁迫、滋扰等行为的，负责人员或者直接责任人员构成犯罪的，应当依法追究刑事责任，但一般不应当认定为恶势力。”这一规定彻底切断了将合法民商事债务催收全盘涉恶化的办案倾向。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院《关于审理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕18号）明确裁判底线：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">行为人因婚恋、家庭、邻里、朋友等民事纠纷，实施殴打、辱骂、恐吓他人或者损毁、占用他人财物等行为的，一般不认定为“寻衅滋事”。对于因真实债务产生矛盾引发的过激催收，只要债务客观存在，催讨行为不得随意推定为“借故生端”或无事生非的寻衅滋事。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>立法设立催收非法债务罪的实体指引：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">《刑法修正案（十一）》设立催收非法债务罪，根本出发点在于实现罪刑均衡。对于虽采取了轻微限制人身自由、恐吓骚扰等手段，但侵害程度相对有限的高利贷催收行为，应当优先适用催收非法债务罪，防止动辄以法定刑更重的寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪数罪并罚，避免刑罚过苛破坏司法公信力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 典型亲办案例复盘：小贷公司杨某涉恶四罪从轻改判案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">理论的透彻与法条的精通，必须依托顶尖的实战能力才能转化为当事人的人身自由。在卓安律师团队承办的杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪、聚众斗殴罪一案中，成安律师带领团队展现了专业功底与破局智慧：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>案件起因与侦查指控：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">被告人杨某经营一家小额贷款公司，因部分客户长期拖欠高额本息，杨某及公司催收人员多次对逾期借款人采取限制人身自由、蹲守恐吓等方式催款。在催收过程中，部分员工还与借款人一方发生聚集性互殴。公安机关侦查终结后，将杨某定性为恶势力犯罪集团首要分子，以涉嫌寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪四项罪名移送检察机关审查起诉，面临十年以上重刑判决的重大危机。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审查起诉阶段的精准阻击：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师团队接受委托后，成安律师迅速组织专案研讨会。针对全案面临刑期最重的聚众斗殴罪，律师团队展开了极为细致的证据比对。成安律师指导办案律师调取了现场全部公共视频监控，并对历次讯问笔录进行逐字审查，敏锐地指出：案涉斗殴事件纯属员工与对方在街头偶遇后因个人口角引发的临时冲突，杨某既无事先预谋，也从未下达过打斗指令，该行为属于员工的个人实行过限。卓安律师据此向检察机关提交了详实的《法律意见书》。最终，检察机关全面采纳了辩护意见，在提起公诉时坚决剔除了聚众斗殴罪的指控，在起诉源头上为当事人成功化解了最危险的重罪。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审判阶段的法条竞合与罪刑均衡：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">案件进入法院审判阶段后，成安律师带领团队重点围绕涉恶定性与法条竞合展开辩护。辩护人提出：刑法修正案新增的催收非法债务罪，客观行为本就包容了轻微限制人身自由与骚扰恐吓。杨某的催收行为事出有因，且借款人本身存在严重违约过错，并未对社会公共秩序造成广泛侵害，若将其与寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪顶格并罚，违背了罪责刑相适应原则。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>最终裁判结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">经过法院开庭审理与法庭辩论，合议庭全面采纳了卓安律师的辩护主张，未对杨某适用恶势力加重处罚与重罪顶格重罚，依法作出判决：犯催收非法债务罪判处有期徒刑八个月，并处罚金三万元；犯非法拘禁罪判处有期徒刑一年二个月；犯寻衅滋事罪判处有期徒刑三年七个月；数罪并罚，最终决定合并执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元。在被控四项重罪、原面临极高实刑预期的困境下，卓安团队成功化解了聚众斗殴重罪与涉恶定性风险，实现了大幅从轻的辩护效果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、审查起诉与审判阶段，辩护律师实现罪轻出罪的实务路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">刑事诉讼是一场严谨的证据战与程序战。当案件由侦查机关移送至人民检察院审查起诉，或者进一步诉至人民法院审判阶段时，专业的刑事辩护律师必须在以下几个核心节点全力出击：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 审查起诉阶段：通过实质性阅卷核查证据，争取起诉前剔除重罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">案件进入检察院审查起诉阶段后，律师拥有全面的全案卷宗查阅权。卓安团队推行四步阅卷法：\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>第一步核查程序瑕疵：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">严格审查侦查机关搜查、讯问、扣押等取证程序的合法性，重点排查是否存在疲劳审讯、诱导性发问以及同步录音录像与笔录不一致的情形，依法启动非法证据排除；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>第二步比对事实矛盾：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">将借款人的陈述与现场客观监控、手机通话记录、微信往来信息进行交叉印证，寻找控方指控体系的逻辑漏洞；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>第三步固定辩护空间：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">全面固定借款人违约在先的证据，提取杨某曾要求员工“依法催收、不得伤人”的正面证据；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>第四步出具法律意见书：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在检察官作出起诉决定前当面沟通，力主对不构成犯罪的罪名在起诉书中直接剔除，避免将重罪争议带入法庭审判阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 审判阶段：围绕法条竞合与实行过限展开辩论，降低基准刑期\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">案件进入法院审判阶段，辩护律师的核心工作在于庭审质证与法理说服：\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>针对恶势力指控：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">律师从组织结构、层级关系、经济特征、社会危害四个法定维度，当庭拆解控方证据链，证明涉案人员属于松散民营企业雇工，绝非称霸一方的恶势力犯罪组织；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>针对多项罪名并罚的风险：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">充分运用刑法法理，论证轻微非法拘禁、滋扰行为与催收非法债务罪的竞合关系，说服合议庭择一重罪处罚或按特殊法条定罪，防止机械相加导致量刑畸重；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>结合认罪认罚从宽制度：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">指导当事人合理行使诉讼权利，争取在最佳时机签署认罪认罚具结书，将法定从宽优惠锁定在判决书中。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 涉案财产处置：申请财产合法性甄别，依法解除企业账户查封\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">涉恶案件中，办案机关往往采取严厉的查封、扣押、冻结措施。辩护律师将协同财务专业人员，开展涉案财产穿透式甄别：\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>区分个人财产与违法所得：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">严格区分杨某个人合法财产与涉案违法所得，区分小额贷款公司的合法注册资本、正常借贷回收本息与高利违法所得；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>出具财产来源证据：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">向法庭提交合法的财产来源证明、审计报告与纳税凭证，申请解除对企业正常生产经营账户、厂房及合法不动产的查封，避免当事人因涉案导致企业全面瘫痪、合法财产遭受不当没收。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、涉案企业负责人及家属应对刑事调查的3个自救原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当企业负责人或家庭成员因催收借贷突然卷入涉恶专案调查，家属往往面临巨大的心理压力与认知盲区。若在此关键时刻乱了方寸，轻则丧失最佳辩护时机，重则导致自身触犯法律。家属必须恪守以下三大危机应对原则：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）初查阶段：全面固定合法借贷证据，切勿擅自串供或销毁凭证\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">一旦获悉公司员工或亲属被办案机关带走调查，家属与企业留守管理人员必须保持绝对冷静：\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>全面梳理并妥善保管合法凭据：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第一时间将借款合同、抵押担保文件、银行转账底单、催收沟通函件、催款录音以及借款人违约失联的证据进行分类整理、电子备份，这些是证明“行为事出有因、系民事维权”不可替代的客观铁证；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>严厉警告：切忌擅自删除聊天记录、转移账本或联系借款人封口！\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当前的电子数据取证与司法鉴定技术极为成熟，任何私自删改数据、统一口径、销毁凭据的行为，不仅会被公安机关技术恢复，还会直接坐实“妨害作证罪”或“帮助毁灭证据罪”，导致司法机关彻底取消对涉案人员取保候审与从宽处理的可能。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）羁押阶段：及早委托专业律师会见，严防“托关系捞人”诈骗陷阱\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">办案机关介入调查或专案组收网抓人后，家属在看守所外极易成为诈骗分子的猎物：\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>看透办案监督机制：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在常态化扫黑除恶专案背景下，司法机关办案实行办案质量终身负责制与极其严格的案件防干预机制，没有任何人具备在法律之外“私下捞人”的能力。凡是声称“与某专案组领导有关系、交几十万就能办取保”的，一律是利用家属绝望心理实施的诈骗；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>切勿盲目指示在押人员供述：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">家属切勿盲目鼓励在押亲属“死不认账对抗到底”，也切勿未经阅卷就劝其“全部认罪争取轻判”。最正确的做法是在审查黄金期内委托资深专业刑事律师进行会见，由律师向其提供专业的诉讼权利指导与心理辅导，帮助当事人在面对审讯时做到实事求是、不夸大事实亦不无端揽罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）退赔退缴阶段：严格区分合法债权与违法所得，规范办理退缴手续\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">退赔与退赃在涉恶借贷案件中是高度敏感的法律动作，走错一步便可能使全盘辩护陷入被动：\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>有理：分清款项性质，切忌盲目代为全盘“退赔”。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">家属必须分清“向被害人退赔人身伤害损失”与“向司法机关上缴涉案违法所得（退赃）”的本质区别。对于侦查机关指控的模糊金额或对方拖欠的本金部分，家属切不可为了争取好态度盲目将全部资金退缴。在事实未查清前盲目代为退赃，在某种程度上无异于代替当事人默认了控方关于强索财产的指控；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>有节：退赔退赃必须在专业律师指导下精准推进。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">退赔方案的制定应当与案件诉讼阶段紧密结合。在审查起诉或审判阶段，配合律师与承办检察官、法官及借款人进行理性的民事损害赔偿协商，在依法赔偿对方合理医疗费用或财产损失的同时，务必促成被害人出具正式的《刑事谅解书》，从而换取法定的量刑从宽幅度；\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">• \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>有据：一切交付必须取得正规法律凭证。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">无论是向司法机关退缴涉案款项，还是向对方当事人支付补偿，必须要求办案机关开具正式的扣押决定书与代保管款收据，或者由法院、公证处、律师见证出具收款收据与调解协议，坚决杜绝私下给付现金或无凭据转账的糊涂账。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">人类最需要同类伸出援手的地方，除了医院，便是法庭。当突如其来的刑案风暴席卷而来，原本正当合法的企业经营\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps45.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在瞬间被贴上涉黑涉恶的重罪标签，企业家身陷囹圄，家庭生活面临崩塌，内心的煎熬与无助难以言表。但请始终坚信：事实可以通过证据还原，法律定性完全可以通过专业力量争辩。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护是一项极其精密的系统性法律工程。它绝非依靠单纯的人情世故或简单的法条引用，而是要求辩护律师深谙侦查机关的立案逻辑、精通审查起诉的证据标准，并牢牢扣准人民法院的裁判底线。只有真正懂证据规则、懂办案流程、敢于在法庭上据理力争的专业刑辩团队，才能在错综复杂的指控网络中抽丝剥茧，剥离不当罪名，守护当事人的人身自由与企业生存希望。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">四川卓安律师事务所作为全国第三家只专注刑事法律业务的精品专业化律师事务所，在首席律师成安博士的引领下，深耕刑事辩护领域近三十年。卓安坚持全国一体化直营运营，汇聚了十余位法学博士、数十位法学硕士以及众多具有原公检法资深从业背景的专业精英，形成了“控、辩、审、学”四维联动的独特办案优势。多年来，卓安团队累计办理刑事案件 8000 余起，在涉黑涉恶、重大职务犯罪、重大经济犯罪领域积累了丰富的无罪化处理、拿掉涉黑涉恶定性与重罪改判的实战经典案例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">我们深知，每一起涉黑涉恶案件的背后，都维系着一个企业的前途命运和一个家庭的悲欢离合。卓安人始终坚守“专注刑事，更专注人的价值”的品牌主张，恪守“卓然而成，报君以安”的庄严承诺，坚持全周期、规范化、有温度的专业陪伴，全力以赴办好每一起受托案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">如果您或您的家人正面临涉黑涉恶、经济纠纷入刑等复杂的刑事调查与法律危机，请务必保持理性。如需查阅更多涉黑涉恶案件成功脱黑、重罪改判案例及专业实务应对指引，可登录四川卓安律师事务所官方网站（zhuoanlaw.com）进行深度了解。法律的尊严在于公正，而专业的刑事辩护，正是通往司法公正不可或缺的基石之路。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Faddd7afe-5ca1-47b8-8dfd-6e1a3f719762.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-16 18:18:23",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":405,"name":406,"icon":407,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":409,"description":410,"keywords":32,"canonical":411,"image":401,"jsonLd":412},"催讨债务被定恶势力犯罪？小贷老板涉四罪，该如何依法辩护？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对民间借贷催收中演变为涉恶犯罪的指控争议，成安律师团队结合涉黑涉恶与经济犯罪辩护实务指出：债务纠纷中的过激催收并不等同于无事生非的涉恶寻衅。若行为系因索要合法债务或高利贷本息引发，依法应优先适用法定刑更轻的催收非法债务罪，阻断重罪拔高认定。在审查起诉与审判阶段，家属切忌盲目串供或恐慌认罪，应及早委托专业律师","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F489",[413],{"@context":354,"@graph":414},[415,422],{"@type":416,"@id":411,"url":411,"headline":400,"description":410,"datePublished":417,"dateModified":418,"author":419,"publisher":420,"articleSection":406,"inLanguage":359,"image":421},"Article","2026-09-16T18:18:23+08:00","2026-09-16T18:21:58+08:00",{"@id":361},{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fe7636321-7341-4312-aa53-9c504168ec96.jpg",{"@type":423,"itemListElement":424},"BreadcrumbList",[425,428,430],{"@type":426,"position":6,"name":427,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":426,"position":38,"name":406,"item":429},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":426,"position":35,"name":400,"item":411}]