[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-664":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},664,"2026-09-24 10:10:10","家人在 KTV 冲突中被定聚众斗殴罪，所有到场的人都要坐牢吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002Fc843f04e-c572-4695-a5e9-973298fdaed9.png","\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">聚众斗殴罪的主体范围与转化条件，与被指控之后的六个辩点\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师事务所·涉黑涉恶犯罪专业委员会出品\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">发布时间：2026年9月24日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002Fc843f04e-c572-4695-a5e9-973298fdaed9.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">KTV 门口的冲突一旦有人重伤或死亡，家属最怕的是到过现场就算聚众斗殴，有人死了就都要按十年以上算。这个推论有两个断点：主体上，《刑法》第 292 条只处罚首要分子和积极参加者，单纯在场、劝阻、围观都不是处罚对象；转化上，致人重伤死亡的转化只在直接加害人与具备概括故意的首要分子之间发生，其他人仍按本罪处理。第 1717 号吴某甲案中，同一场斗殴的四名被告人，直接加害人被判十五年、首要分子被判无期徒刑，另外两名积极参加者只以聚众斗殴罪各处一年六个月；第 350 号倪以刚案中，没有实施拖拽、砍、打行为的三名被告人，同样只定本罪。卓安办理的 L 某案沿同一路径，把到场原因与危险来源做实，刑期从可能十年以上落到一年六个月。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>一、KTV 门口的一场冲突，为什么把没动手的股东也列成了聚众斗殴的被告人\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">“我家人到场是为了劝两边别打了，怎么就成了聚众斗殴的一方？”“撞死人的不是他，也不是他叫来的人，为什么要他承担这个后果？”“现场三十多人，是不是所有到场的人都被认定为犯罪？”这是 L 某家属在案件里反复追问的三个问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">L 某是 S 县一家 KTV 的股东之一，持股比例不高，日常负责场所的对外协调、客诉处理与安全管理，经营另由其他股东负责。某日晚，包厢内两桌客人因琐事发生口角，被工作人员劝开；离场时双方在场所外再次争执，各自打电话叫人。约半小时后，其中一方纠集三十余人，手持刀具、棍棒，驾车来到 KTV 附近，袭击另一方停放的车辆。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">L 某在接到员工电话后赶到现场。到场时冲突已经发生，对方人员正在打砸车辆。他联系了对方一名成员的家长，希望对方停止闹事。此后，另一方人员在驾车逃离时，车辆将对方一名成员撞倒，该成员送医后死亡。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">检察机关以聚众斗殴罪对 L 某提起公诉，指控逻辑是：L 某作为 KTV 股东，属于本方的重要人物；其在冲突中的出现与联系行为，表明他参与了本次聚众斗殴的组织与协调；另一方人员的驾车行为系本方斗殴行为的延续，死亡后果应由本方全体参与人员共同承担。检察机关同时认为本案属于聚众斗殴人数多、规模大、社会影响恶劣并造成一人死亡，按照《刑法》第 292 条第 2 款，聚众斗殴致人死亡的依照故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪定罪处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>二、《刑事审判参考》两起案例：谁才是聚众斗殴的处罚对象，谁才需要转化\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">两起案例都涉及“同一场斗殴、不同的人、差别极大的结果”，一起回答主体范围，一起回答转化范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>2.1 第 1717 号吴某甲案：同一场斗殴，从无期徒刑到一年六个月\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">浙江省台州某职业中专学校内，学生吴某乙因琐事与学生会干部发生冲突并遭殴打，离场时声称“你们给我等着”，随后联系其兄吴某甲来校。吴某甲纠集朱某甲、李甲驱车赶到学校，李甲回住所取来甩棍由朱某甲携带入校。四人在校内会合后未去找老师解决问题，而是一同前往教室。进入教室后双方互殴混打，朱某甲掏出随身携带的折叠刀朝对方乱刺，先后刺中三名学生，另有学生用木桌板敲打朱某甲头部，朱某甲又上前捅刺。经鉴定，两名被害人因大出血死亡，另两人分别为轻伤、轻微伤。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">判决结果是四个不同的档次：朱某甲系直接加害人，以故意伤害罪判处有期徒刑十五年；吴某甲因琐事纠集他人持械聚众斗殴，系首要分子，应对聚众斗殴的全部犯罪后果承担罪责，以故意伤害罪判处无期徒刑；李甲持械积极参加聚众斗殴、吴某乙积极参加聚众斗殴，两人均以聚众斗殴罪各判处有期徒刑一年六个月。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">裁判理由对转化范围作了完整说明。《刑法》第 292 条第 2 款规定的转化，应坚持主客观相统一原则，不能简单以结果进行定罪；聚众斗殴罪的责任主体是首要分子和积极参加者，由此转化犯的主体范围也限定在首要分子和积极参加者之内；对超出共同犯罪故意范围实行过限的被告人，应当根据罪责自负原则由实施该行为的行为人承担相应的刑事责任；基于罪责刑相适应原则，通常只应对直接造成重伤、死亡的斗殴者与首要分子认定故意伤害罪、故意杀人罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">同一份裁判理由还写明，不是所有首要分子都一律转化，而是要看其对重伤、死亡结果是否具有概括故意并在组织、领导、策划行为中有具体表现，例如是否主动给予或要求参与人员携带足以致人伤亡的工具、是否明知可能致人重伤死亡仍默认不加制止。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>2.2 第 350 号倪以刚案：没有实施直接加害行为的人，只定聚众斗殴罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">该案被告人倪以刚一方因琐事与另一方结怨，纠集二十余人携带砍刀寻找对方人员殴打，在街道遇到一名被害人后将其砍伤，致头部颅骨损伤构成重伤，此后又到网吧殴打他人。案件争议集中在两个问题上：单方有斗殴故意是否构成聚众斗殴罪；斗殴中有人重伤的，哪些人要转化。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">裁判理由对第二个问题的处理很具体：首要分子对全部犯罪事实负责，无论其是否实施实行行为，都应转化为故意伤害罪；在实施砍打行为的六名被告人之间，各人所处地位、具体分工、参与程度虽有不同，但行为指向的目标相同，每个人的行为都是整个加害行为的有机组成部分，因此均转化认定故意伤害罪；而另外三名被告人没有对被害人实施拖拽、砍、打的客观行为，仍只认定聚众斗殴罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">两案合起来给出的规则可以概括成一条：聚众斗殴的处罚对象是首要分子和积极参加者，转化的对象还要再窄一层，只有直接造成重伤死亡的行为人与具备概括故意的首要分子进入转化范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>2.3 两案给出的三条审查规则：主体、故意、转化范围\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; line-height: 2;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>审查层次\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>需要核实什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>核不实的后果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">主体范围\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当事人是首要分子、积极参加者，还是仅在现场\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">仅在场未参与的，不属于本罪处罚对象，见第 1717 号的四档量刑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">主观故意\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">到场是被纠集斗殴，还是调停、劝阻、处理问题\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">缺乏斗殴故意的不构成本罪，可能转为其他罪名或者不作犯罪处理\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">转化范围\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死亡重伤后果由谁的行为造成，当事人有无概括故意\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">非直接责任人且无概括故意的，仍按聚众斗殴罪处理，见第 350 号\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>三、卓安办理的 L 某案：从可能十年以上，到有期徒刑一年六个月\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>3.1 案件起点：一人死亡，股东被认定为一方重要人物\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">检察机关以聚众斗殴罪起诉，并按第 292 条第 2 款主张造成一人死亡的严重后果，L 某可能面临十年以上有期徒刑甚至无期徒刑。辩护要处理的问题不是死亡后果是否存在，而是 L 某的行为与这个后果之间有没有法律上的因果关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>3.2 第一层：把到场原因做成一份可核对的材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">承办律师从通话记录、微信聊天记录、现场录音入手，还原 L 某接到电话的时间、通话内容、通话对象。材料显示他接到的是员工的求助电话，到场目的是处理场所内的经营问题，并且在现场主动联系了对方一名成员的家长进行协商。这两件事共同指向一个主观状态：他到现场是为了平息事态，不是参与斗殴。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>3.3 第二层：把危险来源说清楚，让因果链条断在别人身上\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第二层工作围绕“危险来自哪一方”展开。承办律师调取监控、行车记录仪、伤情鉴定与现场勘验材料，证明对方先行纠集三十余人、持刀棍到场并先行攻击车辆；本方人员在人数、器械、时间上都处于被动地位，驾车逃离是面对现实危险时的避险行为。当危险来源、行为顺序与后果发生的过程被梳理清楚，L 某的行为与死亡结果之间就缺少了法律上的因果关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>3.4 结果：情节较轻被采纳，判处有期徒刑一年六个月\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">一审法院采纳辩护意见，认定 L 某在本案中情节较轻，判处有期徒刑一年六个月。从可能十年以上的重刑到一年六个月，变化来自两件事：到场原因被还原为处理经营问题，因果链条被切在对方先行持械攻击与本人避险行为之间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>四、律师观点与六个辩点：聚众斗殴的处罚范围可以从哪六个地方收缩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.1 本罪只处罚首要分子和其他积极参加者，不是所有到场的人\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">《刑法》第 292 条第 1 款把本罪的责任主体限定为首要分子和其他积极参加者。首要分子指在聚众斗殴中起组织、策划、指挥作用的人；积极参加者指在斗殴中表现主动、积极，或者参与较严重犯罪且作用突出的人。这意味着到场人数与处罚人数是两个不同的数字，把“在现场”与“参与斗殴”分开，是所有辩护工作的起点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; line-height: 2;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>身份\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>认定依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>法律后果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">首要分子\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">组织、策划、指挥斗殴，或有明确的纠集、安排行为\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">三年以上十年以下；致人重伤死亡的按转化后罪名处罚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">积极参加者\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在斗殴中表现主动积极，或参与较严重犯罪且作用突出\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">三年以上十年以下；持械、人数多规模大等情形加重\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">一般参与者\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">到场但行为消极、被动，未实施斗殴行为\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">不构成本罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">旁观与劝止者\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">未参与斗殴，也未提供帮助\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"240\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">不构成本罪，可能涉及治安处理\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.2 辩点一：主体范围要回缩，当事人不是首要分子\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">首要分子的认定必须有实际行为支撑：谁提议、谁召集、谁安排工具、谁调度人员。到场人数多、到场顺序早、在现场说话多，都不足以推定首要分子。审查方法是把冲突的全过程切成起因、对峙、动手三个阶段，逐阶段确认当事人在做什么。第 1717 号案中吴某甲被认定为首要分子，依据是其纠集人员并明知携带器械而未制止，这些行为都有具体事实对应；反过来，缺乏这类事实的人不应被拉进首要分子。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.3 辩点二：到场原因是主观故意的核心，调停与劝阻不构成斗殴故意\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">本罪要求主观上有斗殴故意。临时被叫去、事先对斗殴不知情、到场后劝阻或者消极对待的，可能不构成犯罪。证明到场原因的证据在卷宗之外：通话记录与聊天记录能还原接到的是求助电话还是集合通知；现场录音能还原当事人说了什么；是否主动联系对方协商、是否联系场所负责人或者家属，都是指向调停意图的客观材料。卓安律师办理的郑某涉黑案中，辩护意见把聚众斗殴指控分三个阶段分别质证，逐阶段论证当事人是否具备斗殴故意、是否属于首要分子或者积极参加者、是否实际实施暴力，把笼统的“参与聚众斗殴”拆成可以被具体否定的行为单元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.4 辩点三：对合性要核查，一方单方施暴与双方互殴性质不同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">聚众斗殴的典型形态是双方互相攻击。如果一方单方施暴、另一方被动承受或者退让躲避，行为性质就可能从聚众斗殴转向故意伤害或者寻衅滋事，定性改变直接影响量刑。第 350 号案还确认，单方有聚众斗殴故意的也可以构成本罪，但前提是该方有明确的结伙殴斗故意并实际实施了殴斗行为。核查的着力点是行为方向与力量对比：谁先动手，谁在追击，谁在退避。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.5 辩点四：转化范围要限缩，不应对不是自己造成的后果负责\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">《刑法》第 292 条第 2 款的转化，只在致人重伤、死亡的结果上发生，并且依第 1717 号的裁判理由，通常只对直接造成重伤、死亡的斗殴者与具备概括故意的首要分子认定。辩护要做两件事：一是核对后果由谁的行为造成，能不能排除合理怀疑地锁定具体行为人；二是论证其他人的行为属于实行过限，超出共同故意的范围，应由实施者自负。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第 350 号案的处理正是这样分开的：实施砍打行为的被告人转化认定故意伤害罪，没有实施拖拽、砍、打行为的三名被告人仍只定聚众斗殴罪。同一场斗殴里，转化与不转化之间隔着一道行为事实的线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.6 辩点五：违法阻却事由要正面提出，紧急避险与正当防卫不是口号\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当对方纠集多人、携带器械并先行攻击时，本方人员的躲避、逃离、驾车离开都可能构成紧急避险或者正当防卫。论证需要落到四项事实上：现实危险是否客观存在，要看对方人数、器械种类、攻击强度；避险行为是否不得已，要看有没有其他更温和的选择；行为是否超过必要限度；驾车的目的与轨迹是逃离还是冲撞，要看行车轨迹、撞击部位与速度。这些细节决定了抗辩能否成立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>4.7 辩点六：加重情节要逐项对照，持械、人数多规模大不是概括认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">《刑法》第 292 条第 1 款列举了四种加重情形：多次聚众斗殴；聚众斗殴人数多、规模大、社会影响恶劣；在公共场所或者交通要道聚众斗殴、造成社会秩序严重混乱；持械聚众斗殴。每一项都需要具体事实支撑：次数要有时间地点可核对；人数多规模大要有本方与对方的实际参与人数统计；公共场所与社会秩序混乱要有现场记录；持械要核查器械的来源、种类、实际使用情况，第 1774 号案对凶器与普通器械的区分标准同样适用。卓安律师办理的 W 某涉恶案的做法是，在斗殴事实客观存在的前提下不作无谓否认，把重点放在作用有限与自首情节上，同时集中力量论证恶势力标签不成立，最终数罪并罚十一年，标签被剥离。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>五、家属现在能做的四件事，以及律师的价值是什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第一件，不要去联系另一方当事人及其家属，也不要试图私下和解后撤案。群体性冲突案件里，双方接触很容易被记录成串供或者影响证人，把一起事实问题变成两份不利材料。赔偿与谅解可以谈，但应当通过律师在正式渠道内进行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第二件，把家人当晚的行程材料全部找齐。通话记录、微信与短信记录、行车记录仪、手机定位轨迹、停车场记录、场所消费记录，这些材料决定了他在时间轴上的位置：到场是在冲突之前还是之后，冲突发生时他在做什么。L 某案的关键事实就是“到场时冲突已经发生”，而这一事实靠的正是通话与到场时间的核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第三件，把现场有哪些人、各自做了什么，按人逐个写下来。家属往往能接触到其他在场人员的亲属，知道的信息比卷宗更细。按人、按行为列出来，能帮助律师把“本方到底有哪些人参与”与“当事人具体做了什么”两件事分开，这直接影响人数多规模大这一加重情节的认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第四件，尽早让专业律师介入，尤其在伤情鉴定与死亡原因鉴定出来之前。这类案件的定性分歧集中在主体范围与转化范围两处，而它们的证据基础在侦查阶段就固定下来了，越早提出意见，能改变的空间越大。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>律师的价值是什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">聚众斗殴案件最容易出现的失误，是把“在现场”等同于“参与斗殴”，再把“有人死亡”等同于“所有人都要按死亡后果负责”。同一场斗殴，首要分子、直接加害人、积极参加者、旁观者四条线的量刑差别极大，第 1717 号案里同在被告席上的四个人，分别是无期徒刑、十五年、一年六个月、一年六个月。律师的价值在于把当事人的行为从群体叙事里单独拎出来，按阶段、按行为、按因果关系逐项核对，把主体身份、主观故意、因果关系、加重情节四条线分别处理。这不是否认现场发生过斗殴，而是主张当事人在其中的位置被放大了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">聚众斗殴案件的辩护，需要同时处理人员梳理、时间还原、因果关系与加重情节四件事，还要把监控、行车记录、通话数据这些外部材料调到手。只办刑事的律所，在这类交叉问题上的经验更集中，这是卓安在这类案件中最实在的价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>六、条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">《刑法》第 20 条、第 21 条、第 25 条、第 26 条、第 97 条、第 292 条；《治安管理处罚法》相关规定\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">法释〔2013〕18 号《关于办理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》；2018 年《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">《刑事审判参考》总第 148 集第 1717 号吴某甲、朱某甲案、总第 44 辑第 350 号倪以刚案；卓安案例库：L 某聚众斗殴致人死亡案、郑某涉黑案、W 某涉恶案\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>附：卓安在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累与专业战队情况\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>办案积累：作为全国第三家只做刑事的律所，卓安成立以来专注刑事辩护与风险防控，累计办理各类刑事案件超 8000 起，其中涉黑涉恶犯罪案件 500 余件，涵盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、聚众斗殴、敲诈勒索、强迫交易、非法拘禁、开设赌场等关联罪名。涉案人员覆盖组织领导者到普通参与者各层级，已取得不认定黑、不认定恶、不起诉、撤案、改判轻刑、涉案财产解封等辩护效果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>专业出版：卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇，围绕公安机关、人民检察院、人民法院运行机制、律师辩护、办案程序与犯罪类型开展专项研究。涉黑涉恶方向编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，发表黑社会性质组织与恶势力犯罪认定研究论文，形成扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：卓安面向全国律师、公安机关、人民检察院、人民法院、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成课程体系，包括《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：卓安律师获得各类荣誉表彰 100 余项，多名律师受聘为西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心、西南政法大学刑事辩护研究中心、华东政法大学律师学院等高校特邀研究员，并为四川省公安厅、中共成都市委政法委员会、成都市人民政府、成都市中级人民法院等 30 余家公安机关、人民检察院、人民法院及律师协会顾问单位提供咨询顾问服务。艾述洪律师于 2025 年荣任成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶专业战队：四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶专业战队，是卓安在涉黑涉恶方向设立的专业办案与研究团队，由具有原公安机关、人民检察院扫黑除恶办案背景的律师、刑事诉讼法学专家与涉黑案件证据专家组成，定位为涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与轻刑辩护专业力量。主要职能包括：围绕黑社会性质组织“四个特征”与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，排除拔高认定；把当事人从被指控的犯罪组织中剥离，区分组织者、领导者、积极参加者与一般参加者；全面审查“四个特征”证据体系并依法申请非法证据排除；甄别合法财产与涉案财产，为案外人财产、配偶财产和家庭共同财产提出异议；在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段提交不认定黑恶的法律意见；编写办案实务手册与培训课程，输出扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>核心成员：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">首席律师成安博士，执业近30年，长期研究涉黑涉恶案件的性质认定与财产辩护；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">主任何冰冰律师，前市级人民检察院员额检察官、反贪局侦查科科长；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">执行主任艾述洪律师，四川省首批刑事专业律师、卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任，擅长责任拆分与财产甄别；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">副主任魏军律师，原成都市中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">专业战队以事实和法律为依据开展辩护，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002F1cd3f5e1-1360-40b3-9387-6a3d6b682e3c.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cu>卓安律师事务所官网http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">24小时刑事急救专线:17381975473、4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>全文 End\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-24 10:08:08",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"家人在 KTV 冲突中被定聚众斗殴罪，所有到场的人都要坐牢吗？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","聚众斗殴罪的主体范围与转化条件，与被指控之后的六个辩点 卓安律师事务所·涉黑涉恶犯罪专业委员会出品 发布时间：2026年9月24日 【摘要】 KTV 门口的冲突一旦有人重伤或死亡，家属最怕的是到过现场就算聚众斗殴，有人死了就都要按十年以上算。这个推论有两个断点：主体上，《刑法》第 292 条只处罚首要分子和积极参加者，","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F664",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-09-24T10:08:08+08:00","2026-09-24T10:10:10+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002Fc843f04e-c572-4695-a5e9-973298fdaed9.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]