[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-795":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},795,"2026-10-14 15:36:06","卓安黄婧律师 | 受贿罪取保候审，需要监委点头同意吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F14\u002F22eee4ff-d73f-4624-95ac-4253228a0c32.jpg","\u003Cp>受贿罪取保候审，需要监委点头同意吗？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】取保候审的决定权在检察院，缓刑的决定权在法院。监委不能直接点头，也不能直接否决。监委的意见重要，但后面两家司法机关的意见才是决定性的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这些年代理职务犯罪案件，家属问我最多的一句话是：监委那边，能不能想想办法，让人先出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我每次都得先把这个前提掰正。这个问题，问的方向就是错的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>不管家属听到的是哪一种说法，都指向同一个误解：把监委、检察院、法院这三个机关，当成了同一个机关。好像案子只要监委说了算，后面就都得听。真不是这样。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>监委的主要职责，是负责查案，把案子的事实查清、把性质定下来。至于取保候审，决定权在检察院；至于缓刑，决定权在法院。监委在这两件事上，都不能直接点头，也不能直接否决。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我知道这句话家属听着可能不太解气，但它是实情。你花在“让监委放人”上的力气，多半是用错了地方。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三个机关各管哪一段，一张表说清楚\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">办案机关\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">这一段它管什么\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">这一段它不管什么\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">监察委员会\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">调查案件事实、认定案件性质、决定是否留置、是否解除留置、何时移送审查起诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不决定取保候审，不决定缓刑，也不直接提量刑建议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">人民检察院\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查起诉、决定是否逮捕、是否取保候审、是否监视居住、审查羁押必要性、提出量刑建议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不判刑，不定罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">人民法院\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">开庭审理、定罪、量刑、决定是否适用缓刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不查案，不决定强制措施\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>把这三点记牢，后面所有问题都会变得清楚：\u003Cstrong>能不能取保，去检察院问；能不能缓刑，看法院怎么判。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 监委在这两个环节里的角色，是把案件调查清楚、把证据固定好，然后移送给检察院。它交出去的是案件，不是结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这里还要补一句：监委的意见当然重要，因为案件的底子就是它打下的。但“重要”和“决定”是两件事。这一点，家属一定要分清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>取保候审的两个关键时间节点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】真正能争取取保的窗口只有两个：一个是解除留置、案件移送前后，另一个是被逮捕之后申请羁押必要性审查。错过一个少一个。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>取保这件事，不是随时都能争的。它有窗口，而且窗口不长。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一个节点：解除留置当天，或者根本没有采取留置措施就移送\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>先说留置的期限，这是家属判断节奏的标尺。《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十八条第一款规定，留置时间不得超过三个月；在特殊情况下，可以延长一次，延长时间不得超过三个月。第二款还规定，对涉嫌职务犯罪的被调查人可能判处十年有期徒刑以上刑罚，延长期限届满仍不能调查终结的，经国家监察委员会批准或者决定，还可以再延长二个月。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>时间走到哪一步，决定了人接下来会走哪条路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案件从监委移送到检察院，人的去向有两种。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一种，监委在调查结束后做出解除留置的决定，或者案件本来就没有采取留置措施。这时候人就以自由状态进入审查起诉程序。《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》对这一种情形写得很清楚：对未采取留置措施的案件，检察机关受理后，根据案件情况，可以决定是否采取逮捕、取保候审或者监视居住措施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二种，监委在移送时人还在留置状态。这时候适用《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十条第二款：人民检察院应当对犯罪嫌疑人先行拘留，留置措施自动解除，人民检察院应当在拘留后的十日以内作出是否逮捕、取保候审或者监视居住的决定；在特殊情况下，决定的时间可以延长一日至四日。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>请记住这个“十日以内”。这十天，是家属和律师必须提前准备好一切的时间。不要等收到拘留通知书才临时找律师，那时候最宝贵的时间已经过了一半。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还有一个信息，很多家属不知道。根据《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第二百二十条，监察机关一般应当在正式移送起诉十日前，向拟移送的人民检察院书面预告移送事宜，其中包括被调查人的身体状况等可能影响刑事强制措施执行的情形；对未采取留置措施的案件，还应当就采取刑事强制措施提出建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>也就是说，在正式移送之前，监察机关和检察机关之间已经开始沟通了。沟通的落点是保障诉讼顺利进行，不是替检察院把结论定了。这一点要和前面那张表连起来理解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二个节点：逮捕之后，申请羁押必要性审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果检察院审查以后决定逮捕，人进了看守所，是不是就彻底没机会了。不是。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第九十五条规定，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人被逮捕后，人民检察院仍应当对羁押的必要性进行审查；对不需要继续羁押的，应当建议予以释放或者变更强制措施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第九十七条还规定，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人及其法定代理人、近亲属或者辩护人有权申请变更强制措施；收到申请后，应当在三日以内作出决定；不同意变更的，应当告知申请人并说明理由。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这两个条文合起来看，就是一句话：逮捕不是终点，羁押必要性审查是逮捕之后专门留出的一个出口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这里我要跟家属说句实在话。曾有检察机关的专业文章公开指出，实践中“留置即逮捕”的现象仍比较明显，羁押必要性审查的职能发挥得还不够充分。这句话从办案机关自己口中说出来，含义很清楚：这个出口存在，但它不会自己打开，需要有人带着新的事实、新的证据去推动。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>前面提到的那起行贿关联案件，就是从这个口子走出来的。那段时间，监委还有一部分调查证据暂时没有移送，而当事人的移送起诉时间已经到了；与此同时，案件的受贿方刚刚被留置，两边移送的时间对不上，会直接影响后续取证和判决的同步。检察机关因此发函商请监察机关，建议对当事人变更强制措施、把案件退回补充侦查。最后监察机关同意了检察院的建议，当事人才得以取保候审回家。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个案子说明一件事：取保不是靠谁说情说出来的，是案件本身出现了新的、可以被法律认可的事由，然后由有权决定的机关依法作出的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>为什么职务犯罪案件取保这么难：不是监委卡着不放\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职务犯罪案件逮捕率偏高，根本原因不是监委卡着不放，而是这类案件前期证据做得扎实、指控的罪名比较清楚；金额高的，检察院审查后认为符合逮捕条件就会逮捕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这一节我要把话说透，虽然不太好听，但对家属有用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属心里常有一个结：是不是监委故意为难我们。这个想法，我理解，但方向错了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职务犯罪案件逮捕率高，是这类案件本身的特点决定的。监委的调查周期长，前期工作做得很扎实，证据链比较完整，指控的罪名也不太会出现大的偏差。到了检察院这一环，检察官面对的是一个已经基本成形的案件。如果涉案金额又比较高，检察院审查以后认为符合逮捕条件，就会直接逮捕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>换句话说，卡住取保的往往不是某个机关的“态度”，而是案件本身的分量。所以家属真正该做的，不是在“态度”上使劲，而是在案件事实、情节、证据上找到可以依法主张的东西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这也是我不太愿意跟家属说“我们有关系”“我们能打招呼”这类话的原因。这类话听着让人安心，实际帮不上忙，还可能带来新的风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>取保从来不是靠运气，也不是靠一句“我们有关系”。靠的是递交经得起推敲的法律意见书，和一次一次面对面的沟通。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我在这个行业里办了十几年案子。每一起成功的取保或者缓刑，往回看，没有一起是轻轻松松拿到的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先说律师做的事，其实就是两件。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一件，递交相应的法律意见书。把每一条对当事人有利的理由，找到对应的法律依据，写成办案机关能直接采用的意见。第二件，面对面沟通。这一件，比很多人想象的重要得多。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>为什么要面对面。因为每一条对当事人有利的理由，都需要律师在吃透法律规定之后，用最通俗易懂的语言和办案机关说清楚。大家都懂法，见面不是去背法条，不是念那些冷冰冰的条条框框。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>作为当事人的律师，我们会反复会见，对自己当事人的情况和诉求，是最了解的。但办案机关面对的是一摞摞卷宗，对当事人的处境不会有那么多体恤和感情。所以当事人的诉求，需要律师去做衔接和沟通。同一件事，不同的人去沟通，效果真的不一样。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以我一直跟家属说：只要案件出现了取保的机会，就不要被动地放弃。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>再说个我亲手办过的案子，家属可以对着看。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属找到我的时候，当事人被留置刚一个月。她人在外面，什么情况都不知道，很无助。这个案例涉案金额不高，事实比较清楚，情节相对轻微，也没有盘根错节的关系网。按这类案子的规律，本不该长时间留置。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>接下来的两个月，我们跟办案部门保持常态化沟通，每次都反复讲同一组事实：涉案数额小、案情简单，主观恶性低；他全程配合调查、如实交代，认罪悔罪态度好；没有串供、毁证的可能，不存在社会危险性，完全符合变更强制措施的条件。我们不是在求情，是在摆事实、讲法律。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>9月30日，案件正式移送检察院当天，监察机关依法为当事人办理解除留置；检察院快速审查，当天就为他办理了取保候审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三个最容易想反的地方，和家属现在能做对的三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">家属常见的想法\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法律上的实际情况\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">取保要等监委点头\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">取保候审的决定权在检察院，监委不能直接点头也不能直接否决\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">监委不放人，就是故意为难\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">逮捕率高是这类案件证据扎实、罪名清楚决定的，卡点在案件本身的分量\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">缓刑是判的时候才有机会\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">决定缓刑的自首、立功、坦白、退赃、认罪认罚等情节，很多在留置阶段就定调了\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">到处找人打听、统一说法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">删改材料、串供一旦被认定，不仅救不了当事人，还会加重风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一件事：在留置阶段，把该做对的做对。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>留置阶段是律师不能会见的阶段，但恰恰是很多情节被固定下来的阶段。当事人的认罪态度、退赃的节奏和数额、有没有主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的问题，都会在这一阶段留下记录。这一步做对了，后面争取取保和缓刑，才有东西可以递上去。具体怎么做，建议在律师的专业建议下进行，不要凭家属自己的理解去操作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二件事：案到检察院以后，该争的一项都不省。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案件移送到检察院，就进入了真正的黄金窗口。这个时候可以做的至少有三项：申请羁押必要性审查；就认罪认罚与检察机关进行量刑协商；对涉案金额、罪名认定提出意见。这三项工作一步都不能省，尤其是金额的核减和罪名的拆解，往往直接决定量刑落在哪一档。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三件事：不删改材料、不统一说法。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>不删、不改、不补签、不倒签，不联系同案人员和证人统一口径。家属与当事人之间的联系不是绝对禁止，但内容只限于生活事务，绝不涉及案情细节。把握不准的，先问律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最后，我想跟家属说句心里话。案子走到这一步，你们承受的失望和阻碍，都是正常的。找对方向、做对事情，案子依然会有转机。有时候，心态和信念，也是支撑我们走下去的能量。别一个人扛着。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一：留置期间律师能会见吗？\u003Cbr>不能。留置阶段由监察机关调查，律师无法会见。案件移送检察院、当事人被采取刑事强制措施进入看守所之后，律师才可以会见。所以移送前后这段时间，家属要提前备好委托手续，移送当天就能让律师介入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二：取保候审以后，是不是就不会判实刑了？\u003Cbr>不能这样理解。取保候审是一种强制措施，判实刑还是缓刑，是量刑问题，两者不是一回事。取保只是说明办案机关认为不需要继续羁押，最终怎么判，仍然要按照犯罪事实、数额、情节和法律规定综合认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三：退赃到底有没有用？\u003Cbr>有，而且用处很大。按法发〔2012〕17号的规定，不予退缴赃款赃物的，一般就不适用缓刑；反之，不具备该意见第二条所列情形、全部退缴赃款赃物、依法判处三年有期徒刑以下刑罚并符合缓刑条件的，可以适用缓刑。退赃退到哪里、什么时候退、退多少，建议在律师指导下判断，不要盲目操作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四：能不能保证取保、保证缓刑？\u003Cbr>不能。任何人都不应该向家属作这种保证。是否取保、是否缓刑，要由办案机关和法院依法审查决定，取决于案件本身的性质和情节是否达到标准。我能承诺的，是全程透明地把案件的真实情况、可行方案讲清楚，每一步做了什么，都让家属知道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附一：条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十八条，留置期限与延长规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第二百二十条，职务犯罪案件预告移送制度。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十条第二款，监察机关移送起诉已采取留置措施案件的强制措施衔接。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第九十五条，羁押必要性审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第九十七条，申请变更强制措施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第二百零一条，认罪认罚案件对量刑建议的采纳。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第七十二条，缓刑适用条件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第七十四条，累犯和犯罪集团的首要分子不适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》，留置案件与未留置案件刑事强制措施的衔接规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《关于加强和完善监察执法与刑事司法衔接机制的意见（试行）》，2020年国家监察委员会、最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部联合印发。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理职务犯罪案件严格适用缓刑、免予刑事处罚若干问题的意见》（法发〔2012〕17号，2012年8月8日印发），第二条、第三条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2016〕9号，2016年3月28日最高人民法院审判委员会第1680次会议、2016年3月25日最高人民检察院第十二届检察委员会第50次会议通过，自2016年4月18日起施行），第一条、第二条、第三条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>黄婧主任办理案例：L某非法吸收公众存款案，Y某职务侵占案，Z某贪污、受贿案，以及一起行贿关联案件的取保。均已脱敏，结果以法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附二：关于黄婧主任与卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>黄婧｜卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>组织领导黑社会性质组织罪辩护｜非法吸收公众存款与融资刑事风险｜职务侵占案件辩护｜非国家工作人员受贿案件辩护｜涉案财产查封与解封｜云南企业刑事合规体系建设\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事法律服务领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件 100+ 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量）。卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，庭立方严选律师，2026 年获评「LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖：杰出律师（刑事业务）」。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在职务犯罪辩护中，她注重金额认定与涉案财物处置的逐笔核查，把不该由当事人承担的部分一笔一笔摘出来。代表案例：L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案全案脱黑、涉案财产得以解封；Z 某贪污、受贿一案仅认定受贿一项罪名，获法定最低量刑三年；Y 某职务侵占案以证据不足获检察院不予逮捕、最终不起诉结案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>执业信念：忠于客户的信任，为其提供专业、尽责、温暖的刑事法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所｜只做刑事\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2013 年成立，前身为 2009 年创办的\"为你辩护网\"，是中国第三家只专注刑事业务的精品专业化律师事务所。以成都为总部，昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设分所，全国一体化直营运营。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>全所近百名专职刑事律师，含 11 位法学博士、30 余位法学硕士，近三分之一具有原法院、检察院、公安局、监察机关从业经历，以控、辩、审、学四维视角办案。业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事合规、刑事控告全链条。累计办理刑事案件 8000+ 件，承办全国重大影响案件 500+ 件，实现无罪化处理 500+ 件、缓刑 700+ 件、取保候审 700+ 件；出版法学专著 65 部、学术论文 203 篇，开展刑事辩护专题培训 800+ 场。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所｜立足云南、辐射西南\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>定位\"一心一意做好刑事法律服务\"，以\"捍卫生命自由\"为使命。由黄婧律师担任创始人、主任，团队成员包括前法官、检察官、公安及名校法律人才，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规、普法培训全链条，在重大刑事案件属地应对、经济犯罪与职务犯罪辩护、涉案企业合规整改、涉案财产查封扣押与解封等方向提供法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所刑罚执行法律服务委员会，把刑事法律服务延伸到判决之后：财产刑执行服务中心提供涉案财产处置辩护、罚金刑异议减免、执行异议与超额执行维权，人身刑执行服务中心提供服刑规划、减刑假释与暂予监外执行帮扶。依托全所累计办理刑事案件 8000+ 件的办案积累，以及职务犯罪领域发回重审、改判 30+ 件的实战经验。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>免责声明\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文根据法律法规、公开案例与律所公开资料整理，仅供一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对任何律师或机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或结果承诺。是否取保候审、是否适用缓刑，由办案机关和人民法院依法审查决定，需要根据具体案件事实、证据和法律规定综合判断，不能一概而论。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-14 15:33:19",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"卓安黄婧律师 | 受贿罪取保候审，需要监委点头同意吗？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","受贿罪取保候审，需要监委点头同意吗？ 【核心结论】取保候审的决定权在检察院，缓刑的决定权在法院。监委不能直接点头，也不能直接否决。监委的意见重要，但后面两家司法机关的意见才是决定性的。 这些年代理职务犯罪案件，家属问我最多的一句话是：监委那边，能不能想想办法，让人先出来。 我每次都得先把这个前提掰正。这个问题，问的方向","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F795",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-14T15:33:19+08:00","2026-10-14T15:36:06+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F14\u002F22eee4ff-d73f-4624-95ac-4253228a0c32.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]