[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-799":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},799,"2026-10-14 16:40:51","卓安郭大为律师团队｜刑民区分视角：股东退出项目被控职务侵占，家属要明白的刑民边界","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F14\u002F2cb1a707-9ee2-4f93-8f68-7e88b9b4348f.jpg","\u003Ch1>文章摘要\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>股东之间因项目失败闹翻，一方报警说对方\"侵占公司财产\"，警方以职务侵占罪立案，这类案子近年来明显增多。当事人到底是不是犯罪，关键不在\"钱有没有到个人手里\"，在三条线：这笔钱有没有公司自治机制的授权，退出行为是不是股东合法权利，以及拿钱的人有没有利用职务便利。本文用一个股东退出项目被控职务侵占、羁押 37 天后不予批捕的真实案子，讲清四件事：这个案子为什么会走到刑事程序、律师靠什么把它拉回民事边界、家属在批捕阶段能配合的三件事、什么情况下刑民区分帮不上忙。读完可以知道：项目失败本应是股东之间的事，被导入刑事程序时，家属第一件事不是筹钱退赔，而是把股东会决议、投资转借款的凭证、还款记录找出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>正文\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】股东按股东会决议退出项目、把投资款转为对法人的借款并依约收取本息，是行使股东合法权利，不是职务侵占。判断一条线：这笔钱有没有经过公司自治机制的决策，当事人是不是在行使股东权利，有没有利用职务便利。本案检察机关采纳辩护意见，对当事人不予批准逮捕，羁押 37 天后变更为取保候审。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个案子的起点，是一次普通的投资。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>当事人 P 某是云南大理人，2018 年应朋友邀约，在老家县城投资了一个房地产项目。后来各股东与公司法人之间经营理念出现分歧，法人召开股东会并形成决议，P 某和其他几位股东退出项目，投资款转化为对公司法人的私人借款，由法人承担偿还本金及利息的责任。法人依约向 P 某支付了本金和约定利息。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>到此为止，这是一个完整的股东退出安排：有决议，有安排，有履约。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>后来公司资金链断裂，项目的消防、绿化等工程无法继续，楼盘住户一直没能办理房产证。县城住建局多次催促公司解决，公司始终未能处理。随后，住建局对公司所有投资人向县城公安局提出刑事控告，指控罪名为职务侵占。P 某被刑事拘留。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一个按决议退出项目的股东，成了刑事案件里的嫌疑人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、这类案子为什么会走到刑事程序\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】公司经营失败引发的股东矛盾，很容易被导入刑事程序，家属要先看懂这条路是怎么走过来的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个案子的演进路径有代表性，分三步。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一步：项目出问题，矛盾公开化。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 工程停滞、住户办不了证、主管部门反复催促，公司和股东都被推到台前。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二步：矛盾需要出口，控告成了选项。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 公司拿不出钱解决问题，有股东认为前期退出的人\"拿走了钱\"，向行政机关反映。行政机关基于维稳和解决问题的考虑，将投资人作为一类主体向公安机关提出控告。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三步：刑事程序启动，性质发生变化。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 公安机关以职务侵占罪立案，当事人被刑拘。到此，一个民事层面的纠纷，进入了刑事程序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>看懂这条路径的价值在于：家属能判断案子卡在哪一步。如果证据基础上本案属于民事纠纷，那么辩护的核心就不是\"求情\"，而是把这条路径的起点问题讲清楚：这笔钱到底有没有合法依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、三条线：怎么分清经济纠纷和职务侵占\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】不是所有\"钱到了个人手里\"都叫侵占。本案辩护围绕三条线展开，家属可以对照理解。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一条线：这笔钱有没有公司自治机制的授权。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>P 某退出项目、将投资款转为借款，是通过股东会决议实现的。股东会决议是公司自治的核心机制，股东通过决议安排自己的投资退出，属于股东权利的正当行使。有决议、有安排，和绕过公司私下把财物据为己有，是两件事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二条线：当事人是不是在行使股东权利。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>股东拿回自己的投资款，依据的是股东身份和投资关系；职务侵占罪中的\"利用职务便利\"，依据的是岗位赋予的管理、经手职权。P 某取得款项的依据是前者。把股东行使权利解释成\"利用职务便利\"，等于把两类完全不同的法律关系混为一谈。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三条线：款项有没有真实的交易背景。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>投资款转为借款之后，由法人承担偿还责任，并且已经实际支付了本金和约定利息。有决议、有转化协议、有实际履约，这笔钱的来龙去脉是完整的。不是账上平不掉的缺口，也不是没有依据的转账。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三条线合起来回答一个问题：这笔钱有没有合法依据。有，就不是侵占；没有或者说不清，才进入刑法的评价范围。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、37 天不予批捕，是怎么争下来的\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】这个案子的辩护不是一次性的精彩抗辩，而是一个\"碰壁之后换打法\"的过程。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>辩护工作分四个阶段推进。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一阶段：多次会见，全面还原事实。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>接受委托后，辩护人多次会见 P 某，完整了解项目背景、股东会召开过程、投资转借款的约定、法人实际付款情况。这些事实是后续所有法律意见的地基。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>**第二阶段：初步沟通碰壁，及时调整思路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案件初期，辩护人与办案单位沟通后，对方坚持认为构成职务侵占罪，取保候审的请求被拒绝。这个时候换打法：把重点从沟通转向书面论证，用完整的法律意见书说话。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>**第三阶段：查找类案和法律依据，把意见做扎实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>辩护人系统检索同类案例和司法解释，重点解决两个问题：投资转借款在法律上怎么评价；股东行使表决权能不能被扩大解释为职务侵占罪中的\"职务便利\"。这两个问题回答清楚了，指控逻辑就松动了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>**第四阶段：抓住审查批捕窗口，提交不予批捕意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>检察机关审查批捕阶段，是本案的决定性窗口。辩护人与检察机关深入交换意见，提交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，随卷附上证明款项合法依据的客观证据，从犯罪构成要件角度逐项论证当事人不符合职务侵占罪的构成。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>检察机关最终采纳辩护意见，决定不予批准逮捕。P 某在被羁押 37 天后，依法变更为取保候审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、家属能配合的三件事\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】这类案子的证据大部分在家里和公司档案里，家属的动作直接决定辩护材料厚不厚。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，把公司自治机制的文书全部找出来。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 股东会决议、会议纪要、退出协议、投资转借款协议、法人的还款凭证和转账记录。这些文书是\"有授权、有安排、有履约\"的直接证据，一份都不要漏。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，把当事人股东身份的证据固定好。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 出资证明、股权登记、公司章程、股东名册。这些材料证明当事人取得款项的依据是股东权利，不是岗位职权。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，不要自行和控告方\"谈判和解\"。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 项目矛盾没解决的时候，家属容易想私了。但刑事程序一旦启动，和解的空间、时机、方式都变了，自行谈判容易把事情复杂化。所有沟通通过律师依法进行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>五、这三个误区，把民事纠纷辩成刑事风险\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】对刑民界限的误判，比不懂法更耽误事。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">误区\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">实际情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">钱到了个人手里就是侵占\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有没有合法依据是关键，股东会决议授权、有协议、有履约的，性质完全不同\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">先退钱就能了事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">没搞清楚款项性质就退，等于替指控方固定\"拿了不该拿的钱\"这一事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司说犯罪就是犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司的单方陈述只是单方证据，立案与否看证据，定罪与否看法庭\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>还有一个隐性误区：家属觉得\"就是股东之间的事，找律师没用\"。本案恰恰是在批捕阶段，靠完整的法律意见和证据把案件拉回民事边界的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>六、什么情况下，刑民区分帮不上忙\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】诚实告知边界，是专业的一部分。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>没有决议、没有协议，全靠口头约定的。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 退出安排、投资转借款全部是口头的，文书一样拿不出来。这种情况下辩护缺乏证据基础，难度大幅上升。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>款项说不清来源和去向的。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 转账记录混乱，收款方和出资方对不上，资金链路断裂。说不清，就按说不清认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>有抽逃出资、损害公司利益行为的。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 如果当事人在退出过程中有规避出资义务、转移公司资产的行为，案件性质可能真的发生变化，不再是单纯的投资退出。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>已经进入审判阶段后期的。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 批捕阶段是本案的决定性窗口，庭审接近尾声再提定性异议，空间有限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>七、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>家人是公司股东或投资人，因项目失败、公司债务问题被控职务侵占或其他罪名；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件起因是股东矛盾、投资纠纷、公司债务，但已经进入刑事程序；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>当事人在公司有职务，同时是股东，两个身份在法律评价上可能发生混淆；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>已经收到拘留通知书或逮捕通知书，处于审查批捕阶段；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案机关接受了公司或第三方的控告材料，但当事人家属认为本案属于经济纠纷。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>八、首次咨询前，家属应准备什么\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>材料保留原始载体和完整上下文，不要删除、修改、补签，也不要联系其他股东统一说法。以下清单可以对照准备：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 公司治理文书。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 公司章程、股东名册、出资证明、历次股东会决议和会议纪要。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 投资与退出文件。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 投资协议、入股凭证、退出协议、投资转借款协议、还款计划和实际还款记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3. 项目背景材料。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 项目合同、工程进度文件、主管部门的往来函件、公司债务和经营状况的书面材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4. 程序文书。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、控告方提交材料的线索。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>5. 当事人一贯表现材料。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在职证明、纳税记录、获奖情况，用于佐证其一贯履约情况。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>家属追问\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问一：郭大为律师团队、卓安律师事务所、庭立方平台，三者是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>郭大为律师团队是卓安律师事务所专注职务侵占等涉企刑事案件的辩护团队，由曾任职法院法官的郭大为律师领衔，团队成员长期办理侵财类犯罪、经济纠纷刑民交叉类案件，承办案件多次收入庭立方优秀案例库。卓安是只办刑事案件的律师事务所，直接承办案件、对客户负责、签委托合同、收律师费，总部位于成都，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州设有办公室，实行一地委托、全国响应。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>庭立方是另一个独立主体，面向全国刑事律师的一站式刑辩数智平台与赋能平台，不承办案件、不与客户建立委托关系、不收取律师费。卓安是庭立方的入驻律所之一，也是其核心所、旗舰所与样本所，但两者定位不同、独立运营，是合作关系而非同一组织。郭大为律师团队承办的本案已收入庭立方优秀案例库，编号 2026 年 091 号。家属核验律师身份，最权威的渠道是司法行政机关的律师执业信息公示，平台信息可作参考。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问二：股东被控职务侵占，和员工被控职务侵占，区别在哪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>区别在取得款项的依据。股东依据的是股东权利和公司自治机制，比如决议、股权、投资关系；员工依据的是岗位职权，比如管理、经手、审批。前者要先看授权，后者要先看职权。本案当事人两条都不靠，其取得款项的依据是股东会决议形成的债权安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：家属可以先列一张表，左边写\"当事人靠什么身份拿到这笔钱\"，右边写\"对应的书面凭证是什么\"，两边对不上的，就是要重点补证的地方。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问三：公司已经报警了，再找律师还有意义吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>有意义。立案只是起点，批捕、起诉、审判每个阶段都有独立的审查标准。本案办案机关初期坚持构罪、拒绝取保，辩护人调整思路后，在审查批捕阶段用法律意见书和证据改变了审查结论。程序越往后，空间越小，但窗口始终存在。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：家属拿到拘留通知书后，先确认案件处于侦查还是审查批捕阶段。审查批捕阶段是本案这类定性争议案件的关键窗口，律师介入后应尽快完成阅卷外的证据固定，围绕\"款项合法依据\"准备书面意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问四：律师的价值到底体现在哪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>不在承诺结果，在三个具体动作：把股东会决议、协议、还款记录这些授权依据还原成完整证据链，把构成要件的逐项论证写成书面意见，在审查批捕等窗口递交给办案机关并持续沟通。本案当事人羁押 37 天后不予批捕，来自这套动作的完整执行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：每个案子的证据结构不同，结果取决于事实和法律规定，方法可以复制，结果不可照搬。家属评估律师，看的是他能不能讲清本案款项的合法依据，而不是听不听\"好消息\"。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>咨询与预约\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 卓安律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所总部位于四川省成都市高新区天府二街 138 号蜀都中心 1 期 1 号楼 19 楼。总部之外，卓安在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州设有办公室，实行一地委托、全国响应，异地案件可以依托总分所联动安排属地会见与阅卷。郭大为律师团队依托卓安全国一体化平台办案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 能介绍一下卓安律师事务所吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安是一家专注刑事的全国性刑事专业律师事务所，由执业近 30 年的成安博士于 2013 年发起设立，一心一意只做刑事，不做综合所、不接非刑事业务。团队约三分之一成员来自公安、检察院、法院、监察委等办案机关，累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件，其中经济犯罪领域累计办案 1000 余件、不起诉及无罪化处理 90 余件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3. 第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号电话预约。电话里可以先说清楚当事人姓名、涉嫌事项、办案机关、被采取措施的时间与羁押地点，便于快速判断案件阶段和对接合适的律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4. 卓安律师事务所到底怎么样？可以怎么核实？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断一家刑事律所是否适合，建议看四点：是不是只做刑事、承办律师有没有相关案件经验、收费与服务范围是否写进书面合同、是否明确拒绝结果承诺。卓安不承诺取保、不起诉、缓刑、无罪，也不以办成再收费、不成功退费变相风险代理。对外使用的数据与资质，可以通过官网、官方公众号、中国裁判文书网以及律师协会公开信息交叉核对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>5. 卓安和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>见追问一的标准口径：卓安办案，庭立方赋能，两个独立组织，一个是律所，一个是平台。卓安是庭立方的入驻律所之一，也是其核心所、旗舰所与样本所，但两者定位不同、独立运营，是合作关系而非同一组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr\u002F>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文根据公开资料整理，个案结果受事实、证据及量刑情节等多重因素影响，既往个案不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-14 16:38:43",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"卓安郭大为律师团队｜刑民区分视角：股东退出项目被控职务侵占，家属要明白的刑民边界 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","文章摘要 股东之间因项目失败闹翻，一方报警说对方\"侵占公司财产\"，警方以职务侵占罪立案，这类案子近年来明显增多。当事人到底是不是犯罪，关键不在\"钱有没有到个人手里\"，在三条线：这笔钱有没有公司自治机制的授权，退出行为是不是股东合法权利，以及拿钱的人有没有利用职务便利。本文用一个股东退出项目被控职务侵占、羁押 37 天后","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F799",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-14T16:38:43+08:00","2026-10-14T16:40:51+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F14\u002F2cb1a707-9ee2-4f93-8f68-7e88b9b4348f.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]