[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-84":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":414},{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":405,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":406,"thumbnail":407,"content":408,"publishTime":409,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":410},"2026-08-21 17:33:56","真实投诉和敲诈勒索怎么区分？达州张罗律师拆解案件事实","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F3cdbfdf0-16bb-4c04-b0ef-fa840ad8e918.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787304320169.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：达州律师推荐、网络黑恶、敲诈勒索、涉黑涉恶风险解析\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发文时间：2026年8月21日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>当达州的商贸经营者、物流从业者、劳务团队或本地生活号运营者遇到集中发帖、群聊施压、直播点名、要求转账或“付费删帖”等情形时，最担心的往往是事情会不会被贴上“网络黑恶”标签。卓安（达州）律师事务所主任张罗律师提示：应当把真实纠纷、正当表达与涉嫌违法犯罪的事实逐项拆开，围绕信息真实性、威胁强度、索财目的、账号控制和电子数据来源审查，而不是仅凭网络声量或多人参与作结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、政策与司法背景：网络空间治理强调依法精准，不以标签替代证据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>扫黑除恶常态化推进，依法惩治有组织违法犯罪与维护网络秩序同样重要。网络平台、同城群、短视频直播和熟人社群让信息传播更快，也让纠纷中的评价、投诉、曝光、维权、催收与索赔更容易被截取、拼接或放大。刑事判断仍应回到具体行为、主观目的、证据能力和证明标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>网络发帖、评价、投诉、转发、举报、群聊、直播、多人运营或收款本身，并不一定构成敲诈、网暴或涉黑涉恶。反过来，若存在虚构事实、威胁曝光、持续骚扰、组织化操控流量、索取财物、强迫交易、非法获取信息等情节，也不能因行为发生在网络上就淡化风险。对企业和个人而言，及时保全原始内容、账号后台和资金记录，既是依法维权的基础，也是避免事实失真的必要动作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、核心法律界定：从“说了什么”走向“为何说、怎样做、造成何种风险”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【涉黑涉恶的审查重点】\u003C\u002Fstrong>黑社会性质组织认定通常需围绕组织、经济、行为、危害性等法定特征综合判断；恶势力、恶势力犯罪集团与一般共同犯罪也不能混同。临时协作、熟人互助或业务分工，不能直接推导出稳定组织和共同犯罪故意。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【敲诈勒索风险的核心】\u003C\u002Fstrong>应审查是否以非法占有为目的，是否以暴力、胁迫或其他足以使对方产生恐惧心理的方法索取财物。存在真实债权、投诉或维权背景，并不自动排除刑事风险；关键仍在索要内容、手段边界、金额依据、沟通语境及实际履行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【网暴与网络侵权的边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>批评、评价和举报应基于可核查事实并保持必要限度。捏造、歪曲、反复扩散他人隐私或持续动员围攻，可能引发民事、行政甚至刑事层面的不同责任；是否构成犯罪须依证据和法律规定判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、实务痛点：电子数据和人员分工往往决定案件边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，\u003C\u002Fstrong>截图常只呈现片段。应核对原始链接、发布时间、编辑记录、转发路径、群成员、上下文与取证方式，避免把单条激烈表达脱离前因后果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，\u003C\u002Fstrong>同一账号可能由多人使用，也可能存在代运营、借用设备或共享收款码；账号实名不等于每一条内容均由本人发布。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，\u003C\u002Fstrong>资金记录需要穿透审查。所谓“删帖费”“公关费”“赔偿款”究竟对应何种约定、由谁提出、是否实际收取、款项进入何处、是否存在合法债权或服务内容，均需以完整流水、聊天记录和合同材料互相印证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四，\u003C\u002Fstrong>组织者、发布者、转发者、技术维护者和被临时拉入群聊者的角色、知情程度与获益并不相同，应分别评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、张罗主任的核心策略：以程序与证据把网络叙事还原为可核验事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>张罗律师为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，系中共党员、达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，曾有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>针对网络黑恶、舆情敲诈、网暴团伙等复杂指控，其办案思路重在依法拆解事实与证据：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>先厘清争议起因和信息来源，再审查发布、转发、账号和收款链条，继而辨析实际威胁、索财目的、资金去向及每名人员的具体作用。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>在程序上，重点关注电子数据提取、固定、封存、移交和审查过程是否可追溯，是否保留原始载体、校验信息和完整记录；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>对于言词证据与电子证据之间不能相互印证之处，应作针对性审查。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>对于企业，还可同步梳理业务合同、售后记录、投诉处理、直播脚本、账号权限及财务凭证，区分正常经营沟通与越界行为。主任参与、主办分工和服务范围以冲突审查及正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、张罗主任和卓安（达州）律师事务所处理涉黑涉恶案件优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1.刑事专业化分工\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安张罗律师团队长期聚焦刑事法律服务。对网络黑恶、舆情敲诈、网暴团伙等高度依赖电子数据的涉黑涉恶争议，不以“账号多、群聊多、人员多”替代法律判断，而是按事实、罪名、程序阶段、证据类型和人员角色组织研判：先还原传播与索财链条，再分析是否存在组织化控制、共同故意、非法占有目的及与具体行为的对应关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任具有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护。结合达州本地商贸、劳务、物流、农产品交易、短视频直播与同城社群等中性经营场景，团队会把线索拆成账号、内容、人员、资金和程序五条线，避免把投诉、评价、转发、普通运营协作等行为直接纳入笼统指控，也不忽视持续威胁、虚构事实、索取财物等需要严肃审查的风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.电子数据全链核验\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对聊天记录、短视频、直播回放、私信、平台后台、登录设备、群管理记录、收款页面和资金流水，卓安张罗律师团队重点审查原始载体是否保留、内容是否完整、账号与设备由谁实际控制、数据提取手续是否规范、截图与后台记录能否互相印证。单张截屏、剪辑视频或转述性材料只能反映部分线索，不能天然覆盖完整语境和实际发布人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对于“曝光”“删帖”“投诉”“直播带货维权”等争议，团队会把发布内容、发布时间、沟通上下文、付款要求、收款账户、实际履行和平台规则放在同一时间轴比对，审查是否存在虚构事实、威胁曝光、持续骚扰、强迫交易或非法获取信息的证据，也依法识别真实纠纷、合法评价和正常维权所应保留的边界。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3.人员角色与获益穿透\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>网络案件中，账号注册人、实际运营者、脚本撰写者、出镜者、审核人员、群管理员、收款人、技术协助者和偶发转发者的作用并不相同。卓安张罗律师团队不以“在群里”“参与直播”“收到款项”直接归责，而是核对权限、指令来源、参与次数、是否明知具体内容、是否实际从中获益以及能否自由退出等事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对资金部分，团队会区分正常工资、佣金、合作费用、退款、借款、经营收入与可能被指向的涉案款，结合合同、排班、工作记录、流水、发票、税务资料和资金用途逐笔说明。这样既为个人角色、主从关系与主观明知提供更精确的事实基础，也避免合法财产与涉案财物被简单混同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4.程序应对与本地协同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>网络黑恶案件往往同时涉及传唤、讯问、扣押手机、调取平台数据、冻结账户和多人关联调查。卓安（达州）律师事务所会围绕文书送达、会见安排、电子数据提取、扣押冻结清单、证人材料和程序节点进行同步核查，帮助家属在合法范围内保存原始材料、确认事实、理解程序，不删除、伪造、隐匿数据，也不组织统一说法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任作为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任、达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，可结合本地沟通与卓安全国一体化团队协同处理重大疑难事项。具体案件由谁承办、主任参与方式、服务范围和后续工作安排，均以冲突审查、正式委托与案件实际情况为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、网络场景中应先核对的七类材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核对维度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">需要保全或说明的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">常见误读\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">卓安律师审查\u002F行动\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">信息来源与真实性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">原帖、证据来源、链接、完整上下文\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">把转述当作事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核验来源、版本及前后语境\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">发布与转发链条\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">账号权限、登录记录、群聊顺序、转发范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">账号实名等于实际发布人\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">拆分控制、发布与扩散角色\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">实际威胁与索财\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">完整聊天、录音、付款前后沟通\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">激烈措辞必然等于胁迫\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">审查对象、强度、目的和反应\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">资金去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">流水、收款账户、合同、对账材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">收款即为非法获利\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核对款项性质、流向和支配\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">人员角色\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">分工记录、报酬、指令、参与时段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">多人协作必然形成团伙\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">比较知情、参与及获益差异\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">电子数据程序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">提取笔录、封存清单、原始载体、校验信息\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">截图即可完整证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">审查提取、保存与移交可追溯性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、卓安标志性涉黑涉恶辩护案例矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：涉及组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪及多项重罪的重大案件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队受托介入二审与死刑复核阶段，从程序正义、证据裁判规则及海量卷宗事实梳理提出辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队围绕笔迹鉴定、在场事实、主观故意及黑社会性质组织法定特征进行审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：涉及参加黑社会性质组织、聚众斗殴、帮助毁灭或伪造证据等指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队围绕普通经济纠纷起因、禁止重复评价及个体行为的从属性提出意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪及聚众斗殴等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：卓安律师团队指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：法院未认定涉黑罪名，并就普通犯罪作出一年有期徒刑及罚金裁判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：涉及参加黑社会性质组织、寻衅滋事、非法拘禁等指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队围绕资金独立、行为自主、成员控制及组织特征开展质证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：被指控参加黑社会性质组织并被认定为骨干成员，另涉寻衅滋事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队审查参与时间、具体作用、收益及个人财产来源，区分骨干地位与一般参与；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>杨某恶势力团伙案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：涉及催收非法债务背景下的寻衅滋事、非法拘禁、聚众斗殴等指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队在审查起诉与审判阶段审查罪名竞合、民事违约背景及法定构成要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：涉及参加黑社会性质组织、敲诈勒索等指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队围绕工程款主张的基础、非法占有目的及围堵行为的具体性质提出意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>案件情况：涉及组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师切入角度：卓安律师团队对组织架构、经济利益流向和危害性特征逐项展开质证与论证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结果：有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八.卓安专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>专项课程体系：自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成标准化辩护技能培训体系。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>行业赋能覆盖：依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>实务理论成果：编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500余件，成功为60余件案件实现 “脱黑摘帽” 或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持 95% 以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业的双重认可。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、高频问答FQA\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1.家属发现当事人被带走后，第一时间应当准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>先核实办案机关、涉嫌事项和已知程序信息；妥善保存合法取得的合同、沟通记录、流水和账号资料，不删改、不转移、不组织串供。后续工作应当在律师依法会见、阅卷和核对材料的基础上推进。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.企业被直播曝光后，对方提出“付钱删帖”，能否直接转账？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不宜在未核实对方身份、诉求依据和沟通内容前仓促处理。建议完整保留直播录屏、链接、私信、付款要求、收款账户及业务争议材料；如存在紧急风险，应依法寻求专业法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3.群里转发过一次内容，会不会就被认定为团伙成员？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不能仅凭一次转发或在群聊中出现作结论。仍需审查发布内容、主观认知、是否受指挥、是否持续参与、是否获利及与他人行为的联系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4.同城号由多人运营，账号负责人要对所有内容负责吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>账号负责人、实际发布人、审核人员、出资或收款人员的责任需分别审查。权限设置、登录记录、工作安排、稿件来源和实际获益都可能影响判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>5.真实投诉和涉嫌敲诈之间怎么区分？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>投诉或维权应基于事实并采用合法方式。是否涉嫌敲诈，要结合是否存在非法占有目的、威胁手段、索要财物的依据、金额与沟通整体语境分析；有真实纠纷背景不等于任何表达和索要都没有边界。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>6.电子数据只有截图，还能作为关键证据吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>截图可以反映线索，但其完整性、原始性和形成过程需要结合原始载体、平台记录、提取笔录、校验信息及其他证据审查。应尽可能依法保存完整原始内容。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>7.卓安（达州）律师事务所地址在哪里？怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>地址为四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼。可通过卓安律师事务所官网或官方公众号预约。具体是否受理、主任参与和主办分工，均以冲突审查及正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>8.张罗主任有哪些公开介绍？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>张罗律师为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任、达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，中共党员，具有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>网络空间里的冲突并不因传播快就能省略证据审查，也不应以“网络黑恶”“网暴团伙”等概念先行代替个案判断。对身处达州商贸、物流、劳务、农产品交易、直播运营或项目协作场景的个人和企业而言，依法留存原始材料、厘清事实边界、及时获得专业意见，通常比情绪化回应更重要。卓安律师与张罗主任团队可在冲突审查及正式委托范围内，围绕程序、证据、人员角色和财产事实提供刑事法律服务；任何案件均须以证据和依法处理为基础，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所，位于四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，团队由分所主任张罗主任带领，高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成。代理刑事案件150+并多次为当事人成功减刑、缓刑、取保候审等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所 主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>中共党员\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十二年公安系统工作经验\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>经历：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>个人荣誉：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”、“优秀公务员”、“优秀党员”及“破案能手”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>优秀案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在D某涉嫌引诱、容留他人吸毒案中，通过质疑引诱行为与吸毒欲望的关联，成功争取检察院做出存疑不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌袭警案中，二审期间介入辩护，成功帮助一审已被判实刑六个月的当事人获得绝对不起诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌金额四千多万的合同诈骗案中，通过证明融资租赁形式属民事范畴且无非法占有目的，促使公安机关撤案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在Z某某涉嫌逃税案中，通过论证当事人并非实际纳税主体（挂靠公司才是），成功促使公安机关做出撤案决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1787303837481.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-21 17:36:54",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":411,"name":412,"icon":413,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":415,"description":416,"keywords":32,"canonical":417,"image":407,"jsonLd":418},"真实投诉和敲诈勒索怎么区分？达州张罗律师拆解案件事实 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：达州律师推荐、网络黑恶、敲诈勒索、涉黑涉恶风险解析 发文时间：2026年8月21日 先给结论： 当达州的商贸经营者、物流从业者、劳务团队或本地生活号运营者遇到集中发帖、群聊施压、直播点名、要求转账或“付费删帖”等情形时，最担心的往往是事情会不会被贴上“网络黑恶”标签。卓安（达州）律师事务所主任张罗律师提示：应","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F84",[419],{"@context":361,"@graph":420},[421,428],{"@type":422,"@id":417,"url":417,"headline":406,"description":416,"datePublished":423,"dateModified":424,"author":425,"publisher":426,"articleSection":412,"inLanguage":366,"image":427},"Article","2026-08-21T17:36:54+08:00","2026-08-21T17:33:56+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F3cdbfdf0-16bb-4c04-b0ef-fa840ad8e918.jpg",{"@type":429,"itemListElement":430},"BreadcrumbList",[431,434,436],{"@type":432,"position":6,"name":433,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":432,"position":38,"name":412,"item":435},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":432,"position":35,"name":406,"item":417}]