[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-894":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},894,"2026-10-19 15:30:22","职业打假涉敲诈罪，如何无罪辩护？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F19\u002F71be4e73-e329-431b-8b97-0c8505a36643.jpg","\u003Cp>职业打假人因索赔被公安机关以敲诈勒索罪立案，争议焦点在于民事合法索赔与刑事犯罪的边界。根据《刑法》第二百七十四条，敲诈勒索罪须同时具备主观非法占有目的与客观威胁要挟手段，迫使对方因恐惧交付财物；单纯依法索赔、具有正当权利基础的，不构成该罪。2026年1月，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家市场监督管理总局联合发布规范职业索赔典型案例，明确以\"普通消费者的合理生活消费需要\"为标尺区分处置；最高人民检察院亦提出，享有维权依据即不能认定非法占有目的，索赔数额高低本身不决定罪与非罪。本文结合现行规范与司法观点，梳理定罪要件、维权边界、高危情形与无罪辩护的四个切入点，并给出家属应对建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、结论先行：职业打假涉敲诈勒索罪，无罪辩护的核心在\"三性\"审查\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>直接回答标题的问题：职业打假不必然构成敲诈勒索罪，能否作无罪辩护，取决于对\"三性\"的审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，权利基础的正当性。行为人是否确有合法维权依据——商品是否存在真实的质量、标签或食品安全问题，索赔是否于法有据。权利基础正当，是出罪的前提。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，索赔手段的合法性。投诉、举报、诉讼、协商等法定维权途径，不属于刑法意义上的威胁、要挟；只有虚构事实、以非法侵害相胁迫，才可能越过边界。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，索赔范围的关联性。索赔是否落在正当权利范围内，是否超出普通消费者的合理生活消费需要。与正当权利无关联、明显溢价的索取，才可能构罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这\"三性\"对应敲诈勒索罪的两个构成要件与一项重要的司法政策（合理生活消费需要标准），也是无罪辩护四个切入点（否定非法占有目的、否定胁迫、否定恐惧交付、坚持刑法谦抑）的底层逻辑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、实务分析：定罪要件、维权边界与无罪辩护要点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（一）法律依据：敲诈勒索罪的构成要件与维权规范\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百七十四条：敲诈勒索公私财物，数额较大或者多次敲诈勒索的，处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并处或者单处罚金；数额巨大或者有其他严重情节的，处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金；数额特别巨大或者有其他特别严重情节的，处十年以上有期徒刑，并处罚金。本罪以主观非法占有目的、客观威胁要挟迫使交付财物为要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理敲诈勒索刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕10号，2013年4月27日施行）：明确\"数额较大\"\"数额巨大\"\"数额特别巨大\"的认定标准；第二条规定，一年内曾因敲诈勒索受过行政处罚的，\"数额较大\"标准可按第一条规定标准的百分之五十确定；第三条规定，二年内敲诈勒索三次以上的，认定为\"多次敲诈勒索\"。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》第五十五条：经营者提供商品或者服务有欺诈行为的，消费者可要求增加赔偿，金额为商品价款或者接受服务费用的三倍；增加赔偿不足五百元的，为五百元（即\"退一赔三\"）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第一百四十八条第二款：生产不符合食品安全标准食品或者经营明知不符合食品安全标准食品的，消费者可要求价款十倍或者损失三倍的赔偿金（即\"退一赔十\"）；但食品的标签、说明书存在不影响食品安全且不会对消费者造成误导的瑕疵的除外。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 《最高人民法院关于审理食品药品惩罚性赔偿纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2024〕9号，2024年8月22日施行）：对所有购买者均在生活消费需要范围内支持惩罚性赔偿请求，并对知假买假、连续购买、反复索赔及恶意制造假象索赔作出规制。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 最高人民法院指导案例23号\"孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案\"（法〔2014〕18号，2014年1月26日发布）：明确消费者购买到不符合食品安全标准的食品，不论购买时是否明知，十倍赔偿请求应予支持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家市场监督管理总局《规范职业索赔维护市场秩序典型案例》（2026年1月29日发布，共5件）：明确提出以普通消费者的合理生活消费需要为标尺区分处置，不支持超出该范围的惩罚性赔偿请求。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 最高人民检察院《检察长讲堂｜消费维权型敲诈勒索的出罪审查》（2023年11月28日）：明确在行为人具有维权依据的案件中，享有损害赔偿请求权即不能认定非法占有目的；索赔数额高低本身不作为判断非法占有目的有无的界限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（二）定罪核心要件：主观非法占有目的＋客观威胁要挟\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>根据《刑法》第二百七十四条，敲诈勒索罪的成立必须同时具备两个条件：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，主观上具有非法占有目的，即意图无法律依据地占有他人财物。若行为人基于真实消费受损、依法主张赔偿，其索取的是正当权利范围内的财产，不具有非法占有目的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，客观上实施了威胁、要挟手段，使对方产生恐惧并被迫交付财物。单纯的职业打假、依法索赔，即便索赔数额较高、沟通态度强硬，只要未以非法侵害相胁迫，通常不满足这一要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>因此，单纯职业打假、依法索赔，与敲诈勒索罪之间隔着两道门槛：无非法占有目的、无刑法意义上的胁迫。这两道门槛，正是无罪辩护的突破口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（三）合法维权与刑事犯罪的边界：权利基础与合理生活消费需要\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>商品存在真实的质量、标签或食品安全问题，索赔依据《消费者权益保护法》《食品安全法》的退一赔三、退一赔十规定，通过12315投诉、举报、诉讼、协商等途径维权，没有恶意胁迫的，通常属于合法民事维权，不构成犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要重点把握一项当前司法实践中日益重要的审查标准——合理生活消费需要。2026年1月29日，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家市场监督管理总局联合发布规范职业索赔典型案例，明确提出\"以普通消费者的合理生活消费需要为标尺区分处置\"，对超出合理生活消费需要范围购买食品、药品的行为，不支持惩罚性赔偿请求。这意味着，如果当事人大量、重复购买，明显超出生活消费需要，即便商品确实存在瑕疵，其索赔行为的正当性也可能受到质疑，进而影响权利基础的认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同时，根据最高人民检察院的实务观点，在行为人具有维权依据的案件中，其享有损害赔偿请求权，不能认定具有敲诈勒索罪的非法占有目的；但索赔数额的高低本身，不能作为判断非法占有目的有无的界限。换言之，索要的财产性事项若与正当权利相关联，单纯\"要价高\"不构罪；若索要的事项与正当权利没有关联，对无关联的部分，仍可能构成犯罪。这一区分，是辩护中划定\"合法索赔金额\"与\"非法索取金额\"的关键。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还需注意：食品安全法第一百四十八条对\"标签、说明书存在不影响食品安全且不会对消费者造成误导的瑕疵\"设有除外规定，此类标签瑕疵一般不支持十倍赔偿，但据此索赔并不当然构成敲诈勒索，仍须结合是否虚构事实、是否胁迫综合判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（四）高危涉罪情形：哪些行为容易越过红线\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以下情形，因缺乏正当权利基础或使用了非法胁迫手段，容易从民事维权滑向刑事犯罪：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 捏造、伪造商品问题，或通过虚假检测制造质量问题假象；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 以曝光、报案、差评轰炸为筹码，索取明显溢价的\"封口费\"\"和解金\"；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 拿钱即撤举报、撤案的\"交易\"式索赔，实质是以公权力行使相要挟；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 就同一事实重复索赔，或团伙化、产业化批量施压，形成胁迫态势；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>- 威胁人身、围堵门店、限制经营等过激行为，已超出合法维权范畴。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>上述情形的共同特征，要么权利基础虚假，要么手段非法，要么索取无关联，落入了敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（五）无罪辩护的四个切入点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，否定非法占有目的。商品违法属实、索赔有法律依据、真实付款消费，牟利动机不等于刑事非法占有目的。知假买假仍受消费者权益保护法保护（最高人民法院指导案例23号明确，购买者明知食品不符合安全标准仍购买的，十倍赔偿请求应予支持）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，否定胁迫要挟行为。投诉、举报、曝光违法行为，是公民依法行使监督权、舆论监督权，不属于刑法意义上的恐吓、要挟。只要未虚构事实、未以人身或重大财产侵害相胁迫，维权渠道本身合法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，否定恐惧交付财物。商家因规避行政处罚、维护商誉而自愿和解，并非受人身、名誉胁迫产生恐惧，不符合敲诈勒索罪\"因恐惧交付\"的客观构造。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第四，坚持刑法谦抑性。民事纠纷优先通过行政、民事途径处理；应将合法索赔金额从涉案数额中剔除，仅就无关联、无依据的索取部分评价，避免不当扩大犯罪圈。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区澄清\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区一：职业打假等于敲诈勒索。错。牟利动机不影响维权行为的法律属性，知假买假仍受消保法保护；入罪须同时满足非法占有目的与胁迫手段两要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区二：索赔数额高就是犯罪。错。最高人民检察院明确，索赔数额高低本身不决定非法占有目的的有无；高价协商未果的，应通过民事途径解决。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>误区三：投诉、举报就是胁迫。错。依法向监管部门投诉举报是法定监督权，不属于刑法意义上的恐吓、要挟，不能据此认定胁迫要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职业打假涉敲诈勒索罪的无罪辩护，是一项\"三性\"审查：查权利基础是否正当、查手段是否合法、查范围是否合理。只要真实消费、依法索赔、未以非法侵害相胁迫，即便索赔数额较高，也应归入民事维权而非刑事犯罪。辩护须紧扣否定非法占有目的、否定胁迫、否定恐惧交付与刑法谦抑四条路径，把合法索赔从涉案金额中摘清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、家属指引：涉案初期的六项应对建议\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.1. 不轻易签署\"认罪\"\"退赔协议\"或\"悔过书\"，先厘清权利基础。侦查阶段口供影响重大，建议在律师指导下陈述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.2. 第一时间委托专业刑事辩护律师介入，重点审查是否虚构商品问题、是否以非法手段胁迫、索赔是否关联正当权利。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.3. 家属切勿自行与商家\"私了\"或代付\"封口费\"，避免卷入包庇、毁灭证据或共同违法风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>4.4. 系统整理购买凭证、付款记录、商品实物、检测与投诉记录，证明\"真实消费＋真实问题\"，夯实权利基础。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>5.5. 区分行政投诉与刑事边界，配合调查但谨慎表述索赔目的与数额，不主动作不利于己的概括认罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>6.6. 如实说明维权路径（12315、诉讼、协商），主张法定监督权，争取按出罪路径（权利基础正当、手段合法）处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、法律依据（汇总）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文引用规范均为现行有效文本，列明如下，便于核查与溯源：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>7.1. 《中华人民共和国刑法》（2020年修正本）第二百七十四条：敲诈勒索罪的构成要件与量刑档次（数额较大／巨大／特别巨大，或多次敲诈勒索）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>8.2. 《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理敲诈勒索刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕10号，2013年4月15日最高人民法院审判委员会第1575次会议、2013年4月1日最高人民检察院第十二届检察委员会第2次会议通过，自2013年4月27日施行）：数额认定标准，及一年内曾受行政处罚者\"数额较大\"标准减半、二年内三次以上为\"多次敲诈勒索\"等规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>9.3. 《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》（2013年修正）第五十五条：经营者欺诈的，消费者可主张商品价款或者服务费三倍的惩罚性赔偿（退一赔三）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>10.4. 《中华人民共和国食品安全法》（2021年修正）第一百四十八条第二款：生产或经营明知不符合安全标准食品的，消费者可主张价款十倍或者损失三倍的赔偿金（退一赔十）；标签、说明书瑕疵不影响食品安全且不会误导的除外。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>11.5. 《最高人民法院关于审理食品药品惩罚性赔偿纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2024〕9号，2024年3月18日最高人民法院审判委员会第1918次会议通过，自2024年8月22日施行）：在生活消费需要范围内支持惩罚性赔偿，规制知假买假、连续购买、反复索赔及恶意制造假象索赔。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>12.6. 最高人民法院指导案例23号\"孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案\"（法〔2014〕18号，2014年1月26日发布）：明知食品不符合安全标准仍购买者，十倍赔偿请求应予支持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>13.7. 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家市场监督管理总局《规范职业索赔维护市场秩序典型案例》（2026年1月29日发布，共5件）：以普通消费者合理生活消费需要为标尺区分处置，不支持超出范围的惩罚性赔偿请求。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>14.8. 最高人民检察院《检察长讲堂｜消费维权型敲诈勒索的出罪审查》（2023年11月28日）：具有维权依据即不能认定非法占有目的；索赔数额高低本身不决定非法占有目的有无。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文仅为法律科普，不构成具体案件的法律意见，亦不承诺任何案件结果。个案事实、证据与程序差异较大，请以司法机关生效文书为准。如遇具体案情，请咨询正规律师。\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-19 17:28:22",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"职业打假涉敲诈罪，如何无罪辩护？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","职业打假人因索赔被公安机关以敲诈勒索罪立案，争议焦点在于民事合法索赔与刑事犯罪的边界。根据《刑法》第二百七十四条，敲诈勒索罪须同时具备主观非法占有目的与客观威胁要挟手段，迫使对方因恐惧交付财物；单纯依法索赔、具有正当权利基础的，不构成该罪。2026年1月，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家市场监督管理总局联合发布规范职","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F894",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-19T17:28:22+08:00","2026-10-19T15:30:22+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F19\u002F71be4e73-e329-431b-8b97-0c8505a36643.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]