[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-924":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},924,"2026-10-21 16:01:19","套取公款设立小金库，何时定贪污、何时定私分国有资产？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002Fe646c9ab-3c28-4c8d-942b-ab1a1bed4f50.jpg","\u003Cp>套取公款设立“小金库”后，究竟构成贪污罪还是私分国有资产罪，关键不在“是否设立小金库”，而在“资金如何支配、归谁所有、最终去向”。本文依《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十二条、第三百九十六条，《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2016〕9号）第十六条，《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（二）》（法释〔2026〕6号）第七条，《全国法院审理经济犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》（法发〔2003〕167号）等现行有效规定，厘清三类定性边界：资金自始用于单位公务且去向清晰，仅构成违纪；少数人非法占有、控制、私分，构成贪污罪；经集体意志决定、面向全体职工普惠发放，构成私分国有资产罪。同时说明挪用公款、单位行贿、挪用特定款物等衍生罪名，以及部分公务、部分私用的拆分认定规则，供理解与参考。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、结论先行：定性不看“是否设小金库”，只看“怎么用资金”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在职务犯罪案件的办理中，围绕“小金库”的争议长期存在。一个常见的误区是，把“设立小金库”本身等同于犯罪，或者反过来，以为只要辩称“钱都用在单位公务上”就能一概免责。这两种认识都不准确。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>罪与非罪、此罪彼罪的分野，并不取决于“是否设立小金库”这一形式，而取决于资金的来源、支配方式、主观目的与最终去向四条主线。具体而言，可以划出三条边界：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，若套取、截留资金自始为公、全程为公，全部用于单位合规公务且去向清晰、票据完整，则仅构成违纪，给予政务处分，不计入任何犯罪数额；第二，若国家工作人员出于非法占有目的，将公款控制后用于个人消费、报销私费或仅向少数人私分，则构成贪污罪，既遂后即便将部分款项用于公务也不扣减犯罪数额；第三，若以单位名义、经集体意志决定、面向全体职工或绝大多数职工按统一规则普惠发放，则构成私分国有资产罪，且本罪仅处罚直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>下文沿“纯违纪—贪污罪—私分国有资产罪—衍生罪名”四个层次，结合现行有效的规范逐一展开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、深度分析：小金库型案件的定性框架\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（一）概念前提：小金库是违纪概念，不是独立罪名\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所谓“小金库”，根据《中共中央纪委、中华人民共和国监察部、中华人民共和国财政部、中华人民共和国审计署关于在党政机关和事业单位开展“小金库”专项治理工作的实施办法》（中纪发〔2009〕7号）的界定，是指“违反法律法规及其他有关规定，应列入而未列入符合规定的单位账簿的各项资金（含有价证券）及其形成的资产”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>由此可见，小金库本身并非《中华人民共和国刑法》规定的独立罪名，而是一个财经纪律与监察语境下的事实概念，描述“账外账”的资金状态。它既是违纪行为的发生场所，也可能是贪污、私分国有资产等犯罪的资金载体。设立小金库这一行为，依《中国共产党纪律处分条例》等相关规定可单独构成违纪；但案件最终是否进入刑事评价、定为何罪，取决于资金被如何使用，而非“小金库”这一标签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（二）纯违纪、不构成犯罪的唯一情形\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>资金进入小金库后，并非一律构成刑事犯罪。实务中，同时满足以下全部条件的，仅构成违纪，不构成犯罪：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，设立、套取、截留资金的初始目的，仅为弥补单位账内无法报销的公务缺口，不具有个人占有、私分或牟利的故意；其二，账外资金全部用于单位公务开支或合规事务；其三，全程无个人截留、无个人消费、无少数人私分；其四，资金去向清晰、票据完整、经办人明确，可形成闭环印证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>此种情形下，相关公务开支不计入任何犯罪数额，不存在所谓“既遂后冲抵”的问题——因为行为自始缺乏非法占有目的，本就不成立贪污等财产犯罪。对责任人员，依公职人员政务处分相关规定给予处分即可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要特别澄清的是，上述“不计入犯罪数额”的规则，仅适用于自始为公的情形。一旦行为人套取时已具非法占有故意，则另当别论（见下文贪污罪部分）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（三）构成贪污罪的边界与典型情形\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十二条规定，国家工作人员利用职务上的便利，侵吞、窃取、骗取或者以其他手段非法占有公共财物的，是贪污罪。小金库场景中，贪污罪的认定遵循一条核心边界：先占有控制、后用于公务，等于贪污既遂，不扣减犯罪数额，仅在量刑时酌情考虑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这一边界有明确的规范依据。《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2016〕9号）第十六条规定：“国家工作人员出于贪污、受贿的故意，非法占有公共财物、收受他人财物之后，将赃款赃物用于单位公务支出或者社会捐赠的，不影响贪污罪、受贿罪的认定，但量刑时可以酌情考虑。”《全国法院审理经济犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》（法发〔2003〕167号）亦明确：“行为人控制公共财物后，是否将财物据为己有，不影响贪污既遂的认定。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>要点辨析：认定贪污，必须区分“公款去向”与“赃款去向”。公款去向是判断行为人是否具备非法占有目的、是否构成犯罪的基础事实；赃款去向是犯罪成立后对赃款的处分，不影响定罪。若证据证实资金自始用于单位公务、行为人无非法占有目的，则该部分不计入贪污数额；若行为人套取时即具非法占有故意，待其实际控制、支配公款即已既遂，此后用于公务、捐赠等任何处置，均不改变已成立的犯罪事实，仅作量刑情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结合实务，小金库场景下四类情形通常落入贪污罪的评价范围：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一是个人或少数经办人、管理层私自支配小金库资金，用于个人消费、报销个人费用；二是以封口、安抚、酬劳为名，仅向经办人、班子少数人分款，普通职工不知情；三是虽经集体研究，但私分范围仅限领导、管理层，对普通职工隐瞒；四是账外隐匿资金、销毁痕迹、虚假平账，以秘密方式实现个人或小团体的占有。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（四）构成私分国有资产罪的四要件与立案标准\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十六条规定，国家机关、国有公司、企业、事业单位、人民团体，违反国家规定，以单位名义将国有资产集体私分给个人，数额较大的，构成私分国有资产罪，对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员，处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处或者单处罚金；数额巨大的，处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本罪为纯正单位犯罪，仅处罚直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员，这是其与贪污罪在主体层面的关键区别。构罪须同时满足四项要件：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，单位真实的集体意志，即经班子集体研究、依单位议事程序决策，而非个别人擅自决定；第二，普惠性分配，面向单位全体职工或绝大多数正式职工按统一规则发放；第三，对内相对公开，领取人员知晓福利来源与发放事实，有签领记录、台账可查；第四，主观上为单位集体谋利，目的是解决全员福利，而非少数人占有。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>关于入罪数额标准，需特别注意规范的变化。2026年5月1日起施行的《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（二）》（法释〔2026〕6号）第七条，已对刑法第三百九十六条第一款“数额较大”“数额巨大”作出明确规定：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    一般国有资产：“数额较大”为二十万元以上不满二百万元，“数额巨大”为二百万元以上；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>    特定款物（救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、帮扶、移民、救济、防疫、社会捐助、社会保险基金等）：“数额较大”为十万元以上不满二十万元，“数额巨大”为一百万元以上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需说明的是，《最高人民检察院关于人民检察院直接受理立案侦查案件立案标准的规定（试行）》曾将“累计数额十万元以上”作为私分国有资产罪的立案起点，但该数额标准在《解释（二）》施行后，其数额层面的功能已被上述新标准取代。当前认定本罪入罪门槛，应以《解释（二）》第七条为准，区分一般国有资产与特定款物分别判断，不宜再将“十万元”作为一般情形下的统一立案标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要强调的边界是：若为小范围管理层私分、对普通职工隐瞒，则不符合“集体私分”的本质，不应认定为私分国有资产罪，而应穿透认定共同贪污。这也是司法实务中区分两罪的核心抓手。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（五）小金库衍生的其他罪名与罪数认定\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>小金库资金还可能牵出其他刑事罪名，应依资金的实际用途与支配主体分别评价：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>挪用公款罪。 《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十四条规定，国家工作人员利用职务上的便利，将小金库公款挪归个人使用，进行非法活动，或者数额较大、进行营利活动，或者数额较大、超过三个月未还的，构成挪用公款罪。账外公款同样属于本罪的挪用对象。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>单位行贿罪与行贿罪。 以单位名义、为单位利益，使用小金库资金向他人行贿的，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十三条定单位行贿罪；个人为私利支配小金库资金行贿的，依照第三百八十九条定行贿罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>挪用特定款物罪。 《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百七十三条规定，小金库资金来源于救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、扶贫、移民、救济七类特定款物的，擅自改变专用用途，情节严重，致使国家和人民群众利益遭受重大损害的，可构成本罪；普通财政资金不适用本罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>滥用职权类犯罪。 《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百九十七条规定的滥用职权罪，以及第一百六十八条规定的国有公司、企业、事业单位人员滥用职权罪，仅在违规支配账外资金、造成法定重大公共财产损失，且无法评价为贪污、挪用、私分等罪名的情形下，作为兜底条款适用。纯设立小金库、正常公务开支、无损失的，不构成本类犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>非国有单位的对应罪名。 非国有单位人员侵吞账外资金的，依《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百七十一条定职务侵占罪；挪用账外资金的，依第二百七十二条定挪用资金罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>滥发津补贴违纪与私分国有资产罪的界分。 使用账内合规资金超标准发放福利，一般认定为违规发放津补贴的违纪行为；但通过虚列、截留、账外隐匿等手段骗取资金设立小金库，再向全员普惠发放的，达到《解释（二）》第七条数额标准的，应认定为私分国有资产罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>部分公务、部分私用的拆分规则。 证据扎实、自始用于单位公务的部分，不计入犯罪数额；个人截留、私分、支配的部分，单独计入贪污或挪用数额。这一规则体现主客观相统一原则与“存疑有利于被告人”的精神，要求在个案中逐笔甄别资金性质。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、实战案例：定性之争——贪污罪与私分国有资产罪之间\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>F某涉嫌贪污罪一案，由四川卓安律师事务所吕灵兮律师担任辩护人，案件焦点恰为本文核心命题：F某的行为究竟构成贪污罪，还是私分国有资产罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>辩护过程中，辩护人提出：F某的行为可不作为犯罪处理；即便认定构成犯罪，其行为至多构成私分国有资产罪而非贪污罪，且私分国有资产罪已过追诉时效。需说明的是，追诉时效的判断取决于法定最高刑，而法定最高刑又取决于涉案数额所落入的档次（《解释（二）》第七条区分一般国有资产与特定款物、数额较大与数额巨大），故时效主张须结合具体数额档次展开，不能脱离数额笼统断言。 同时，辩护意见指出，涉案“非生产经营性资产”的认定证据不足，涉案金额的认定存在重大问题，当年的破产程序中并未对非生产经营性资产的范围作出界分，评估报告等文件对范围界定不明确且存在矛盾，难以准确确定涉案金额；此外，F某具有应当认定为自首而不仅是坦白、在共同犯罪中起次要作用系从犯、积极退赃等从宽情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>经审理，人民法院采纳了辩护人的部分意见，但以贪污罪判处F某有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金人民币一百万元。这一结果凸显了“贪污罪与私分国有资产罪”的定性之争：法院最终以贪污罪论处，关键考量在于涉案资产的处置是否真正体现单位集体意志、分配是否面向职工普惠公开，还是由少数人、管理层实际控制并对职工隐瞒。定性不同，主体范围、处罚对象与量刑结构均将发生实质变化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要说明，本文所述案例结果不代表同类案件必然得出相同结论，亦不构成任何结果承诺。每一个案件的事实、证据与法律适用均不相同，具体认定须以有权机关的正式决定为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、给当事人与家属的建议\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一时间厘清资金性质与用途。 将小金库资金的来龙去脉逐项理清：哪些用于单位公务、哪些被个人支配、哪些向职工发放。对确属公务支出的部分，尽早整理合同、票据、经办人证言、审批流程等书证，形成闭环。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>集体决策务必留痕。 若确属为单位职工发放的福利，应保留会议决议、签领台账、发放标准等文件，证明分配具备集体意志与普惠公开特征，避免被穿透认定为少数人贪污。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>切勿销毁账目、虚假平账。 账外隐匿、销毁痕迹、做假账，会将本可停留在违纪层面的问题升级为刑事犯罪，并彻底阻断从轻、减轻处罚的空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>收到调查通知主动说明、配合退缴。 对确有公务支出性质的部分，应据实陈述并提供证据；在事实清楚的情况下主动退缴违法所得，是实践中被广泛认可的从轻情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>尽早委托专业刑事律师介入。 小金库案件定性差异巨大，专业律师能够准确把握“公款去向”与“赃款去向”的界分、主客观证据的印证关系，在定性边界上争取主动。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>理性面对、不盲目兜底也不对抗。 既不因害怕而一概“认账”，也不因侥幸而隐匿对抗。在查清每笔资金性质的前提下，依法主张权利，才是维护当事人合法权益的正道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文仅为法律知识交流与个案经验分享，不构成针对任何具体案件的法律意见或诉讼策略建议。每个案件的事实、证据与法律适用均不相同，读者如遇具体法律问题，应咨询具有相应资质的执业律师。本文所述案例结果不代表同类案件必然得出相同结论，亦不构成任何结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-21 17:04:21",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"套取公款设立小金库，何时定贪污、何时定私分国有资产？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","套取公款设立“小金库”后，究竟构成贪污罪还是私分国有资产罪，关键不在“是否设立小金库”，而在“资金如何支配、归谁所有、最终去向”。本文依《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十二条、第三百九十六条，《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2016〕9号）第十六条，《最高人民法院、最","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F924",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-21T17:04:21+08:00","2026-10-21T16:01:19+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002Fe646c9ab-3c28-4c8d-942b-ab1a1bed4f50.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]