[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-984":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},984,"2026-10-22 17:43:03","重庆的职务犯罪案件，人从留置转到看守所，律师先会见还是先阅卷","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002F16a633e3-e6af-47e7-9c92-e3ba04754851.jpg","\u003Ch2>摘要\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>留置结束、案子移送检察院，人从留置场所转到看守所，家属见到律师常问两句话：什么时候能见到人，什么时候能看到卷。这两件事的法定起点其实是同一天，都是案件移送审查起诉之日，但实现条件差得很远。会见凭三证就能约，看守所至迟四十八小时内要安排；阅卷要等卷宗移交、案管登记、电子卷制作，实务中常要几天到两周。更关键的是移送后还有十日先行拘留期，检察院要在这十日内决定逮捕还是取保候审，这段时间会见能办，阅卷往往办不了。所以先会见不是习惯偏好，是那几天里少数能动的动作。但先阅卷也有它的道理，代价同样存在。这篇把两种做法各自的依据都摆出来，也说清第一次会见该问透的四件事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>一、这不是习惯之争，是程序条件之差\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）两种做法都在执业规范之内\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>有的律师接手当天就去会见，有的律师先等卷宗。这两种排序在执业规范里都找得到依据，不存在哪一种更专业。家属在咨询时如果听到必须先会见或者必须先阅卷这类说法，反而要多问一句：依据是什么。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>排序不同，往往是因为案件情况不同。案情简单、当事人在留置期间已经全部交代的，先阅卷效率更高；案情复杂、当事人自己也说不清哪一笔是哪一笔的，先见人更稳。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属真正在意的其实不是顺序，是两件事：人什么时候能被看见，卷什么时候能被读透。这两件事在实务里各有各的堵点，把堵点弄清楚，顺序的问题自己就解开了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）会见权和阅卷权的法定起点是同一天\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这一点容易被误解。有人认为会见权是提前产生的，其实不是。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十九条规定，辩护律师可以同在押的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人会见和通信；辩护律师持律师执业证书、律师事务所证明和委托书要求会见的，看守所应当及时安排，至迟不得超过四十八小时。同一条第四款还规定，自案件移送审查起诉之日起，辩护律师可以向犯罪嫌疑人、被告人核实有关证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第四十条规定，辩护律师自人民检察院对案件审查起诉之日起，可以查阅、摘抄、复制本案的案卷材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>两条的起点都是移送审查起诉之日。所以会见和阅卷不是权利上的先后，是同一天打开的两扇门。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）两者的差别在实现条件，不在权利本身\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>同一天打开，推开的难度不一样。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>会见这一端，只要三证齐全，看守所四十八小时内必须安排。阅卷这一端，卷宗要从监察机关移交到检察院案件管理部门，登记受理、制作电子卷、分配给承办检察官，律师还要递交手续、预约阅卷时间。这一圈走下来，几天是常态，赶上案件集中的时候两周也常见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以实务中的先会见，很多时候不是主动选择，是那段时间只有这条路能走。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>二、更倾向先会见，有三个实务原因\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）程序上：会见不依赖卷宗，阅卷依赖\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>会见凭委托手续就能办，不需要等任何一方准备好。阅卷必须等卷宗到位。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这个差别在留置转看守所的节点上被放大了。因为就在这几天里，当事人的强制措施状态还悬着，而律师手上除了当事人的说法，什么都没有。这个时候不去见人，手上就是空的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）心理上：从完全隔绝到有人进来，第一次会面的价值最高\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>留置期间是一个完全封闭的环境。监察法没有规定律师介入监察调查，也没有为被留置人员设置会见辩护人的程序。也就是说，在几个月的时间里，这个人没见过家属，没见过律师，能说话的只有办案人员。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>从这样的环境转到看守所，第一次会见的作用不只是法律咨询。要告诉他外面的事：家里怎么样，谁在照顾老人小孩，工作上的事有没有人在处理。这些内容不产生法律效果，但它决定这个人接下来能不能稳定地把事情说清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一个处于恐慌里的人，记不住细节，也说不清顺序。这在职务犯罪案件里尤其明显，因为这类案件的争点常常落在某一笔钱的时间、地点、事由、经手人上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）辩护上：先拿到原始陈述，再去比对卷宗，才找得到矛盾\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这是三个原因里最实质的一个。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一次会见拿到的，是这个人在没看过卷宗、没被律师提示过任何重点的情况下，自己讲出来的版本。这个版本的价值在于原始。它和留置期间的讯问笔录之间有没有出入，和行贿人的证言之间有没有矛盾，都要靠这个原始版本去比。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果顺序反过来，先阅了卷，律师心里已经有了控方的框架，坐到会见室里，提问就会不自觉地往那个框架上靠：这一笔是不是这样，那一次是不是那样。当事人顺着问题回答，讲出来的东西就是被塑造过的。原始版本一旦丢了，再想找回来，很难。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>先会见，本质上是在给后面所有的比对留一个基准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以第一次会见有个动作要克制：不要先给判断。把问题不大或者麻烦得很这类结论说在前面，当事人后面讲的所有内容都会往那个方向调整。合适的顺序是先让他按自己的讲法讲完，讲到哪里卡住，再回头问。卡住的地方，往往就是后面最需要和卷宗核对的地方。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>三、另有一个时间窗，只对会见开放\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）移送起诉后有十日先行拘留\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>案子从监察机关移出去这一步，《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十二条第（四）项规定，监察机关经调查认为犯罪事实清楚、证据确实充分的，制作起诉意见书，连同案卷材料、证据一并移送人民检察院依法审查、提起公诉。人被转出留置场所，就发生在这一步之后。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国监察法》第五十四条规定，对监察机关移送的案件，人民检察院依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》对被调查人采取强制措施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>具体怎么采取，《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十条第二款写得很明确：对于监察机关移送起诉的已采取留置措施的案件，人民检察院应当对犯罪嫌疑人先行拘留，留置措施自动解除；人民检察院应当在拘留后的十日以内作出是否逮捕、取保候审或者监视居住的决定，特殊情况下可以延长一日至四日；这段期间不计入审查起诉期限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）十日窗口是最值得争取的节点之一\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>对一个已经被留置几个月的人来说，这十天决定的是一件很具体的事：接下来是继续关着，还是有可能取保候审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>而这个决定作出之前，检察院必须听取意见。《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十三条规定，人民检察院审查案件，应当讯问犯罪嫌疑人，听取辩护人或者值班律师、被害人及其诉讼代理人的意见，并记录在案；辩护人提出书面意见的，应当附卷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）阅卷往往赶不上十日窗口\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>十天听起来不短，但卷宗流转、手续递交、预约阅卷这一套走完，很可能已经用掉一半。等看到卷，提交不捕意见的窗口已经关了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>会见不用等。人一进看守所，手续递上去，四十八小时内就能坐下来谈；谈完当天就能写意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这是很多律师宁愿先跑一趟看守所的实际原因。不是不想看卷，是这个窗口等不起。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>四、先阅卷的理由，和需要付出的代价\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）带着卷宗去会见，一次能问到点上\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>先阅卷的好处很实在。卷宗里有什么，指控的逻辑是什么，哪几笔的数额最要紧，看完心里有数，会见就能直奔主题，一次问到位，不用来回跑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对异地羁押、会见名额紧张、每次只有半小时的案件，这个优势更明显。半小时里问完八件事和问完两件事，效果差得远。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>有一种情况确实更适合先阅卷：当事人在留置期间已经全部交代，对指控的基本事实没有异议，家属也明确希望往认罪认罚的方向谈。这时候要解决的不是有没有争议，是量刑空间有多大，而量刑空间只能从卷宗里看。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）代价是提问会被卷宗带着走\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>代价前面提过一句：律师看过卷，提问就很难再中立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还有一层：先阅卷再见人，容易把当事人的辩解当成和卷宗不符的部分来处理，而不是当成一条独立的信息来源。而职务犯罪案件里，恰恰是那些和卷宗不符的说法，常常指向控方证据的薄弱处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这也是先会见最硬的一条理由。不是为了抢时间，是为了守住一个没被污染的版本。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>五、会见不是一次，第一次要问透四件事\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>（一）会见不止一次，移送前后能做的事也不一样\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>会见不是见一次就完。监察机关移送的案件，至少要见三次，每次任务不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一次在移送后尽快安排，任务是拿原始陈述，重点在听，不在问出结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二次在阅卷之后，任务是核对。带着卷宗里的矛盾点去，一笔一笔问：这笔钱笔录上写的是这个数，你当时是怎么讲的；证人说某年某月某日在某地送的钱，那天你在不在重庆。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三次在认罪认罚协商之前，任务是交底。量刑区间大概在哪、签了会有什么后果、不签会走什么程序，都要说清，不能替当事人做决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这里还有一个时间界线值得记住。《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十九条第四款把会见能做的事分成两段：移送审查起诉之前，辩护律师可以了解案件有关情况、提供法律咨询；自案件移送审查起诉之日起，才可以向犯罪嫌疑人、被告人核实有关证据。对监察机关移送的案件来说，人一转到看守所，这项权限就已经打开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这也是第一次会见要尽早的一个理由。早一天，能做的事就多一项。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一次会见要问透的是四件事：留置期间被问过什么、哪几笔认了、签过什么材料、身体怎么样。一件一件说。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（二）留置期间被问过什么、怎么答的\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>这是第一件，也是最容易漏的一件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>留置期间的讯问笔录，会作为证据进入卷宗。当事人转看守所后，检察院还会再讯问一次。两次说法如果不一致，在没有合理解释的情况下，很容易被当成翻供。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以第一次会见必须问清：留置期间一共被问过几次，每次问的是哪几笔，当时是怎么答的，笔录有没有逐页看过再签字。这些内容记下来，将来和卷宗一比对，哪里一致、哪里不一致，一目了然。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（三）哪些认了，哪些没认\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>要分笔记，不能只记总数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职务犯罪案件的数额是一笔一笔累加的，每一笔的定性、是否实际取得、计算时点都可能不同。当事人笼统地说都认了，实际上可能是把不该认的也认了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>（四）签过什么材料，身体情况怎么样\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>除了讯问笔录，还可能有情况说明、退缴凭证、主动上交财物登记表。签过什么、什么时候签的、签的时候看没看清，都要问。留置期间签的这些材料，将来都会成为卷宗的一部分，事后想否认签过，很难。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>身体情况也要当场记录。这一项不上卷宗，但它决定后面几个月这个人能不能配合。有慢性病的要问清用药，需要申请所内就医的当天就提。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>六、从移送那天到卷宗到手，这段时间不空\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>会见完了，卷还没到，中间往往还有几天。这几天有几件事可以做。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>先确认人关在哪里。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第八十五条规定，拘留后应当立即将被拘留人送看守所羁押，至迟不得超过二十四小时；除无法通知或者通知可能有碍侦查的情形外，应当在二十四小时以内通知被拘留人的家属。收到通知，就知道人进了哪个看守所，会见预约也才排得上。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>把委托手续递到位。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 近亲属可以代为委托，《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十四条第三款规定，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在押的，可以由其监护人、近亲属代为委托辩护人。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>申请阅卷，把时间约上。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 手续递交的同时就把阅卷申请提上去，不要等通知。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>在不捕的窗口里提交书面意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 基于第一次会见拿到的信息就可以写，不需要等卷宗。这个阶段本来就有很多判断只能基于当事人陈述和案件基本事实。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>准备财产来源材料。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 工资、奖金、经营性收入、借贷往来的凭证，越早整理越好。这类材料家属能做，也不占用律师时间。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>记住一条界线。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第四十四条规定，辩护人不得帮助犯罪嫌疑人、被告人隐匿、毁灭、伪造证据或者串供。会见时听当事人说，不等于替他组织说法。这条线律师要守住，家属也要知道。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch2>七、两个案例\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一个，是会见拿到的东西，卷宗里没有。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>某市城建投资集团副总经理 Y 某受贿案，单独收受 100 万元及越野车一辆，伙同上司收受 920 万余元。卓安律师团队承办后，在会见中听当事人讲起自己在共同犯罪里的实际位置：职务较低，分赃较少，多笔款项由上司决定和支配。这个情况在案卷里并不突出，是会见时才完整浮现的。团队据此整理从犯的证据材料，向法院提交辩护意见，同时推动退缴违法所得。法院最终以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十年六个月，并处罚金八十万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二个，是阅卷看到的东西，会见时想不到。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>某公司负责人 Z 某职务侵占、私刻印章案，涉及关联公司九家，业务和资金交错。案件在审查批捕环节被批准逮捕。移送审查起诉后，团队经阅卷发现，多笔指控的金额认定不当，缺乏对应的银行流水和财务账簿支撑，还有将行贿行为径直认定为职务侵占的情况。这些问题不是靠当事人陈述能发现的，只能逐笔对账。经过两次退回补充侦查，检察院最终取消了 3 笔职务侵占指控和 1 笔挪用巨额资金指控，并将部分指控变更为挪用资金。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>两个案子放在一起，说的是同一件事：会见给的是一个版本，阅卷给的是另一个版本，辩护的空间往往产生在两个版本对不上的地方。卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师团队办理这类案件，通常把第一次会见排在移送后的三天之内，先听，再核，最后才展开卷宗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>结语\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>不必纠结先后的形式。真正决定案子走向的，是两件事有没有做透：会见要把当事人的真实说法听透，包括他自己觉得不重要的那些细节；阅卷要把控方的全部证据吃透，包括那些看起来没问题的部分。两件事都做扎实，才谈得上对案件负责。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对自己案子的节奏拿不准的，可以说一下目前所处的阶段，是在留置、已经移送，还是刚到审查起诉。不同阶段该先动哪一步，确实不一样。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所　吴亮\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-22 17:42:28",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"重庆的职务犯罪案件，人从留置转到看守所，律师先会见还是先阅卷 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","摘要 留置结束、案子移送检察院，人从留置场所转到看守所，家属见到律师常问两句话：什么时候能见到人，什么时候能看到卷。这两件事的法定起点其实是同一天，都是案件移送审查起诉之日，但实现条件差得很远。会见凭三证就能约，看守所至迟四十八小时内要安排；阅卷要等卷宗移交、案管登记、电子卷制作，实务中常要几天到两周。更关键的是移送后","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F984",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"Article","2026-10-22T17:42:28+08:00","2026-10-22T17:43:03+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F22\u002F16a633e3-e6af-47e7-9c92-e3ba04754851.jpg",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]