[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-qa-1042":404},{"entity":4,"seo":356},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":200,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":300,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":332,"homeStats":333,"serviceProducts":346},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,122,129,134,140,147,152,156,161,166,171,176,180,187,195],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":119,"caseTypeName":120,"caseTypeCode":121},688,"X某涉嫌故意杀人罪、帮助毁灭证据罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获罪轻判决","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F0f36a3aa-35f3-48c4-97ea-9d54b41a553e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 结果： 被告人陈X犯帮助毁灭证据罪，判处 有期徒刑 两年十个月。 亮点： 成功区分主 从犯 地位，为从犯争取最低量刑； 构建完整证据链条，排除非法证据干扰； 量刑建议精准落地，实现罪责刑相适应。 焦点： 陈某某行为",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":123,"title":124,"thumbnail":125,"summary":126,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":127,"caseTypeCode":128},687,"Y某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师为其辩护，获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F32f405ba-83df-4123-8cc4-71e8bf5c2dcc.png","【案情简述】 2016年2月至 2019年11月间，Y某作为深圳市某传播有限公司总经理及实际控制人，在为某控股集团汽车销售有限公司(以下简称汽车销售公司)提供车展等服务时，为在招标、项目执行监管以及合同款的结算等过程中得到时任汽车销售公司展","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":127,"caseTypeCode":128},686,"T某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从受贿罪（量刑十年以上）辩护为非国家工作人员受贿罪（量刑五年以上）","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fb1d0699f-ad98-4416-a004-260a4f48ad3d.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非国家工作人员受贿罪（控方指控受贿罪） 结果：判处有期徒刑十年六个月（涉案金额529万元） 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从受贿罪（量刑十年以上）辩护为非国家工作人员受贿罪（量刑五年以上） 2. 通过主",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},685,"李某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获缓刑","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法吸收公众存款罪 结果：判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金人民币五万元。 亮点： 1. 成功推翻 公诉 机关关于当事人获取融资提成的指控，减少违法所得认定金额； 2. 通过 从犯 、自首、退赃等多","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":143,"summary":144,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},684,"刘某某涉嫌非法生产制毒物品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，二审成功减轻刑罚（改判没收已扣押款项6.2万元）","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F9ecad9fa-0873-4b29-a11e-ac76c7e1a65e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法生产制毒物品罪 结果：二审维持原判刑期（有期徒刑六年），但纠正追缴违法所得认定，改判没收已扣押款项6.2万元。 亮点： 成功论证XX犯罪事实系犯罪预备，依法减轻处罚； 通过退赃情节争取量刑从宽； ","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},683,"詹某涉嫌非法经营罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fc0006b70-6d78-4b88-a919-0f5dac64533c.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：非法经营罪 结果： 法院采纳辩护意见，四名被告人均获从轻量刑， 主犯 李某某判处 有期徒刑 一年（基准刑以下减轻处罚） 亮点： 成功打掉\" 单位犯罪 \"指控，避免企业刑事责任牵连 通过司法审计锁定关键",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},682,"T某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案（37天）,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，取保候审","案情简介 2023年11月，嫌疑人T某于小红书上了解到涉案减肥药品牌，后开始在淘宝上售卖。同年11月，韩熙（网名）通过微信与T某沟通，称其有价格更为便宜的韩国药，T某便转而开始售卖该品牌减肥药，有买家要购买该药，T某便联系韩熙由其从沈阳发货",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},681,"X某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从犯认定减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F314078f1-0af3-4de4-807c-f3b9a4a9b2f9.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贩卖毒品罪 结果：被告人被判处无期徒刑（涉案毒品数量特别巨大情况下获得法定刑以下减轻处罚） 亮点： 1. 在涉案甲基苯丙胺达08克的重大毒品案件中成功争取认定 2. 通过证据对抗排除部分毒品数量的归责",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":164,"summary":165,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},680,"X某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fe698a92e-a2e7-4b61-a8c7-0a0ad1fe1dd6.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贩卖毒品罪 结果：法院采纳部分辩护意见，认定犯罪未遂，判处有期徒刑九年六个月（法定刑期十年以上）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证侦查程序违法，排除关键言辞证据 2. 推翻\"贩卖目的\"指控，争取\" 非法持有毒",{"id":167,"title":168,"thumbnail":169,"summary":170,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证",{"id":172,"title":173,"thumbnail":174,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":10,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":185,"caseTypeCode":186},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":188,"title":189,"thumbnail":190,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":192,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":198,"summary":199,"caseTypeId":192,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",[201,204,207,210,213,218,221,227],{"id":38,"code":128,"name":127,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":186,"name":185,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":192,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":222,"code":223,"name":224,"summary":225,"keywords":226},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":119,"code":121,"name":120,"summary":228,"keywords":229},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},799,"2026-10-26 17:50:47",75,"文山市看守所","走私普通货物罪","2026年10月10日 石晨炜 走私普通货物罪——卓安（昆明）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F50e82abf-f9cd-4023-99d8-3020b6a99b42.png","2026-10-26 17:49:05","石晨炜",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fb0a368ce-5024-448d-9b3c-c3c66f14a084.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,276,288],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":253,"city":254,"caseType":255,"title":256,"thumbnail":257,"content":10,"publishTime":258,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":259,"lawyers":260},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[261],{"id":253,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":274,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":275,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":277,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":278,"city":279,"caseType":280,"title":281,"thumbnail":282,"content":10,"publishTime":283,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":284,"lawyers":285},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[286],{"id":278,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":287,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":289,"createdAt":252,"updatedAt":252,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":290,"city":291,"caseType":292,"title":293,"thumbnail":294,"content":10,"publishTime":295,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":296,"lawyers":297},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[298],{"id":290,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":296,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":299,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",41,[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":192,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":222,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[334,337,340,343],{"value":335,"label":336},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":338,"label":339},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":341,"label":342},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":344,"label":345},"6","全国分所",[347,350,353],{"title":348,"desc":349},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":351,"desc":352},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":354,"desc":355},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":357,"description":13,"keywords":358,"canonical":359,"image":10,"jsonLd":360},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[361],{"@context":362,"@graph":363},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[364,370],{"@type":365,"@id":366,"url":359,"name":7,"inLanguage":367,"publisher":368},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":369},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":371,"@id":369,"name":7,"url":359,"logo":372,"image":372,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":367,"address":373,"geo":376,"department":378},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":375},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":377,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[379,384,388,392,396,400],{"@type":380,"@id":381,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":385,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":389,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":393,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":397,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":369},{"@type":380,"@id":401,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":374,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":369},{"entity":405,"seo":417},{"id":406,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":408,"title":409,"thumbnail":410,"content":411,"publishTime":412,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":413},1042,"2026-10-26 13:54:53",10,"卓安达州解答：我是支行负责人，客户存款进了员工私人账户，这算职务侵占吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F1389e7aa-fdca-4d7c-a05c-1ebfd2859f3a.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fc8a7951f-f5d3-43f7-bddf-d1815990a3cc.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml21652\\wps25.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cem>发布时间：2026年10月26日\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cem>主题标签：金融犯罪、吸收客户资金不入账罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪、账外吸存、县域金融、川东、达州\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cem>发布机构：卓安（达州）律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·金融犯罪辩护部\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先给结论\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">我在达州下面一个县的支行做负责人。去年年底冲存款时点，一个柜员拉了七百多万，钱没进大账，走的是她自己开的过渡账户，给客户开的是盖了业务章的手工存单。今年四月客户来取钱取不出，一查系统里没有这笔存款，人已经被带走了。现在来了十几个客户，手里都拿着单子，我被反复问到的一句话是：这钱到底算不算存在我们银行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">先把结论说清楚：这类案子先看三个节点——钱是怎么取得的、有没有记入法定账簿、后来用到了哪里。吸收客户资金不入账，指的就是吸收进来了但账上不反映；如果员工从一开始就打算把这笔钱据为己有、挥霍或者挪作他用，可能转为职务侵占或者挪用资金；如果客户交钱时就没有真实的存款意思，单子也是伪造的，那可能是诈骗加伪造金融票证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">罪名不同，追责主体和量刑档次差别很大，辩护的着力点也完全不同。围绕川东县域网点问得集中的六个问题，卓安（达州）律师事务所逐一解答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、账外吸存牵出多罪，需要弄清的六个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题一：钱进了员工私人账户，客户手里的单子还算不算存款？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">先看单子本身。银行的重要空白凭证有编号、有领用登记、有系统对应记录。真正的存单能在系统里查到开户信息；查不到的，要么是账外开具的手工凭证，要么是伪造的凭证。这两者的法律后果不同，取证时必须先把凭证的来源查清：什么时候领的、谁领的、编号在不在作废清单里、印章是业务章还是私刻的章。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">再看交付过程。客户在营业时间、营业场所，把钱交给穿着工装、坐在柜台里的员工，取得盖有银行印章的凭证，依《民法典》关于储蓄存款合同与职务行为的规定，客户有理由相信这是银行在收款，存款合同关系可以成立。这也是为什么很多案件里，银行即便主张“员工个人行为”，仍被判令承担兑付或者赔偿责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">刑事上则要看这笔钱有没有进银行的账。进了账再被员工转走，是职务侵占或者挪用资金；根本没进账，才落入吸收客户资金不入账的评价范围。这一字之差，决定了案件的侦查方向和追赃路径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">达州县域还有一类特殊主体：曾经的协储员、代办员，以及网点聘用的临时揽储人员。他们不是银行正式员工，但长期以银行名义在乡镇收储，客户对他们的身份认知就是银行的人。这类案件要同时审查授权文件、报酬结算方式和历史操作惯例，不能只凭劳动合同判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题二：吸收客户资金不入账罪，构成要件到底是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">《刑法》第一百八十七条规定，银行或者其他金融机构的工作人员吸收客户资金不入账，数额巨大或者造成重大损失的，构成吸收客户资金不入账罪。2006年《刑法修正案（六）》修改后，这一条不再要求“以牟利为目的”，也不再要求“将资金用于非法拆借、发放贷款”，只要吸收客户资金不入账、达到数额或者损失标准，就可以入罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">现行立案追诉标准掌握为：吸收客户资金不入账数额在二百万元以上，或者造成直接经济损失数额在五十万元以上。也就是说，即便资金已经追回、客户没有实际损失，只要不入账的数额达到标准，仍然可能构成犯罪。这一点常被误解，很多负责人以为“钱还上了就没事”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">“不入账”的实质是在法定账簿上不反映。判断方法是把三本账对齐：客户的凭证、网点的业务流水、银行的法定账簿。凭证有、流水无、账簿无，是典型的账外吸存；凭证有、流水有、账簿无，则要看是否存在科目挂账、过渡户核算的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二款规定单位犯罪：单位犯前款罪的，对单位判处罚金，并对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员依照前款处罚。支行被认定为单位犯罪的，负责人往往就是那个“直接负责的主管人员”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题三：什么时候会从“不入账”变成职务侵占或者挪用资金？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">分水岭在占有目的形成的时间和资金的实际去向。吸收客户资金不入账，评价的重点是账务处理违法、资金游离于监管之外；职务侵占，评价的重点是把本单位财物非法占为己有；挪用资金，评价的是擅自使用、准备归还。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">实务中常见的三种走向。第一种，钱进了过渡户，用于网点冲时点、垫付到期存款，事后归还，客户本息无损失，倾向于不入账或者挪用资金。第二种，钱被员工用于放贷、投资、赌博，无法归还，倾向于职务侵占，同时因账外吸存另涉他罪。第三种，钱从一开始就没有对应真实存款，单子是假的，客户交钱的对象其实是员工个人，倾向于诈骗。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">还有竞合问题。同一笔资金既构成吸收客户资金不入账，又构成职务侵占的，属于想象竞合，从一重处断；不同笔资金分别对应不同行为的，可能数罪并罚。认罪认罚阶段争的是罪数，审判阶段争的是数额，两件事要分开准备。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">达州本地的案子还有一个特点：资金常被用于“以存引贷”或者替逾期客户垫资。这类情形下，员工往往辩称是“为单位完成任务”，占有目的被削弱，定性可能回到不入账或者挪用资金，追赃也有了基础。把资金用途查清，比在口供上反复解释更有用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题四：支行负责人为什么会被追责，怎么判断是不是单位犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">单位犯罪的认定还是那三条：以单位名义、体现单位意志、违法所得归单位。放到账外吸存的场景里，具体化为四问：网点有没有下达存款任务、任务完成情况有没有纳入考核、过渡账户是不是网点统一使用、贴息或者返现的钱从哪出。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">如果答案是任务由网点下达、完成情况计入考核、贴息从网点费用列支，那么这笔业务就带有单位意志的痕迹，负责人很难说自己完全不知情。反过来，如果员工私自操作、佣金自付、账户自用、网点从未组织，个人行为的认定就有基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">负责人的第二重风险来自管理失职。即便不构成单位犯罪，监管上可能因内部控制、员工行为管理、重要空白凭证管理不到位被处罚；民事上可能因未尽管理义务承担相应责任。三条线的结论可以不同，处理时要分开评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要提醒的是，讯问中常出现“你是否知道”这类概括问句。知道有存款任务，与知道员工开假存单，是两个层次的事实。回答时要把层次说清，不要用一个“知道”把两种事实捆在一起。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题五：客户的钱最后谁来赔，银行能不能以“个人行为”抗辩？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">民事上，客户主张兑付的路径通常有两条：一是主张储蓄存款合同成立，要求银行支付本息；二是主张银行对员工行为承担用人单位责任或者表见代理后果。两条路径的举证重点不同，前者要证明交付与凭证真实，后者要证明外观上有理由相信是职务行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">银行的常见抗辩是“员工个人行为、资金未入账、印章系私刻”。这一抗辩在刑事上可能成立，在民事上未必。法院通常看四点：是否在营业场所、是否在工作时间、是否使用银行凭证、客户是否有过错。四点中前三点指向银行，第四点指向客户，最终的赔偿比例往往按过错分担。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">刑事追赃与民事赔偿是两条并行线。客户在刑事程序中申报损失，能拿回多少取决于追赃结果；民事判决则确定银行应承担的部分。实践中不少案件是刑事判决之后另行起诉银行，所以负责人一侧的应对，不能只盯刑事案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">达州这边还有一层现实：涉案客户多为乡镇中老年人，存款是养老钱，情绪激动、集体来访的情况常见。处置上要避免两件事：一是不作任何书面承诺，二是不要私下签“先行垫付”协议而不经法务审核。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题六：现在该做什么，顺序不能错\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一步是内部自查，但要经律师设计。查什么：涉案客户清单、凭证编号、印章使用登记、过渡账户流水、网点任务与考核文件、员工行为排查记录。自查报告一旦形成，可能成为将来的证据，措辞必须审慎，不能写成“确认员工个人诈骗”这类定性结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二步是监管报告。账外吸存属于重大操作风险事件，按监管要求应当及时报告。报告时点、报告内容、报告口径都会影响后续的行政处罚评价。这一环节要与刑事辩护同步考虑，避免报告内容与将来庭审中的主张自相矛盾。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第三步才是退赔。退赔的顺序、对象、凭证、协议条款都要设计：先退哪一类客户、按本金还是本息、协议里写不写“代员工退赔”、要不要保留追偿权。写错一句，可能把银行从“有过错”推到“已认可责任”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">不能做的动作也很明确：不要让员工统一口径，不要补做凭证或者补登台账，不要销毁手工存单和登记簿，不要私下与客户签和解协议。这些动作在县域网点的监控与凭证体系下，几乎都会被比对出来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、为什么选择卓安（达州）律师事务所？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>优势一：达州本地直营分所，熟悉川东县域金融生态\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（达州）律师事务所位于通川区恒基大厦，立足达州、服务川东北，坚守只做刑事案件的定位。分所以张罗主任带队，其长期办理经济犯罪与涉企刑事案件，在一起涉案十七万余元的诈骗案中，从单位行为与自然人犯罪的界分入手，厘清责任边界，最终为当事人争取到缓刑。这类“单位还是个人”的辨析，正是账外吸存案件的第一道关口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">达州的金融案件有自己的土壤：县域网点密度高、存款考核压力大、协储与代办传统深、乡镇客户对凭证的辨识能力弱。分所办理这类案件，会先把凭证、流水、账簿三本账对齐，再谈罪名。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>优势二：以“资金取得—是否入账—占有目的”三层拆解为核心的定性辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这类案件的辩护按三层推进。第一层看资金怎么取得：客户是基于存款意思交付，还是被虚假凭证骗取，决定案件走不入账还是诈骗。第二层看有没有入账：凭证、流水、账簿三本对齐，判断是账外吸存、科目挂账还是正常业务。第三层看占有目的：资金去向、归还能力、事后表现，决定是职务侵占、挪用资金还是不入账。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">落到卷宗上，团队会把每一笔涉案资金做成一条线：客户、金额、时间、凭证编号、收款账户、资金去向、归还情况。这条线做完，哪些是网点行为、哪些是个人行为，哪些有占有目的，往往一目了然。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>优势三：账务核查与凭证鉴定的协同支持\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（达州）律师事务所依托卓安刑事辩护委员会·金融犯罪辩护部，团队成员涵盖高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者与国内知名院校律师。金融犯罪辩护部办理吸收客户资金不入账、职务侵占、挪用资金、非法吸收公众存款、违规出具金融票证等案件，账务与流水逐笔核对后形成核减意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">分所与总所是协同关系。凭证鉴定、印章鉴定需要异地机构，涉案资金流向涉及重庆、成都等地的，可以跨所协同：本地会见、异地取证、类案检索同步推进。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>优势四：从内部自查到审查起诉的全流程服务\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这类案件通常不是从刑事开始的。先是客户取不出钱，再是网点自查，然后是分行核查与监管报告，最后才是报案。卓安（达州）律师事务所强调服务前移：自查阶段协助划定范围与措辞；报案与侦查阶段把握询问要点与强制措施；审查起诉阶段就罪名、罪数与数额提出书面意见；审判阶段围绕占有目的与量刑情节展开辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">真正有用的工作往往发生在报案之前。分所会协助把三件事做完：把凭证与账簿的对应关系理清，把资金去向图做出来，把该报告的事项按程序报告。承办时先讲清三件事：现在处在哪个阶段、这个阶段的风险点在哪、哪些动作不能做。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安办理过的金融犯罪相关案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>案例一：刘某某涉诈骗案 —— 单位行为与个人责任界分，判处三年、缓刑四年\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案情简介： 刘某某系某商贸公司实际负责人。公司经营出现大额亏损后，股东会商议通过虚构家电交易申领国家补贴，由股东、员工收集亲友身份信息，虚开发票、上传虚假资料，骗取家电以旧换新补贴，涉案金额171818元。公诉机关按自然人共同犯罪，将全部涉案总额归责于刘某某一人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">辩护工作： 卓安张罗主任团队从四个层面论证本案的单位行为特征：犯意来源于公司经营亏损，决策经过股东会，实施依托公司组织架构，资金分为股东福利、公司运营与员工奖金三部分而非进入个人腰包。同时提出，全部数额归责于一人不符合罪责刑相适应，应将其个人实际获取金额作为重要参考；并固定全额退赃、坦白、认罪认罚、企业经营困境等从宽情节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案件结果： 法院采纳坦白、全额退赃退赔、认罪认罚、主观恶性较小等意见，结合企业经营的特殊背景从轻处罚，判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>案例二：李某某涉违规出具金融票证案 —— 法院判决无罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案情简介： 李某某系某银行工作人员，因涉嫌违规出具金融票证罪被提起公诉，指控围绕其经办的票证业务是否存在违规出具、是否造成损失展开。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">辩护工作： 卓安律师团队辩护从构成要件入手，审查票证出具的权限依据、审查流程与经办分工，说明涉案行为不符合“违规出具”的客观要件；同时就主观明知与损失认定提出意见，指出指控证据不能排除业务操作与审批流程本身的合理性问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案件结果： 法院判决李某某无罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>案例三：熊某某涉违法发放贷款案 —— 泸州江阳法院判决无罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案情简介： 熊某某系某小额贷款公司高管，因涉嫌违法发放贷款罪被提起公诉，同案多名被告人均被指控参与犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">辩护工作： 卓安律师团队结合贷款发放流程、公司业务制度、审批权限与风控记录，证明涉案贷款发放符合公司内部规定与行业惯例，不存在违反国家规定发放贷款的行为；通过股东会决议、审批文件与风控报告，证明其已尽合理审查义务；对同案被告人分别制定策略，逐一排除关联性证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案件结果： 泸州市江阳区人民法院判决熊某某无罪，同案多名被告人亦被判决无罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>案例四：熊某某涉违法发放贷款案——泸州江阳法院判决无罪，同案多名被告人亦获无罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案情简介：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\"> 熊某某系某银行支行负责人，因发放贷款被以违法发放贷款罪提起公诉，指控认为其在授信调查与审批中存在违规行为并造成损失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">辩护工作： 卓安律师团队从三个方向推进：核对涉案贷款是否符合“违反国家规定”这一前提，区分内部管理要求与法律、行政法规的强制性规定；审查损失认定与放贷行为之间的因果关系，剔除市场风险与担保物贬值的影响；就主观上是否明知借款人资质造假提出质疑，并申请调取完整的授信档案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\">案件结果： 泸州江阳法院判决熊某某无罪，同案多名被告人亦获无罪。贷款链条的两端——放的与借的——适用的是不同的构成要件，不能互相替代。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、账外吸存风险自查表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">风险自查项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">高风险信号\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">卓安建议的应对措施\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">重要空白凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">存单领用与作废记录不匹配、手工凭证大量开具\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">调取领用登记与作废清单，逐张核对编号\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">印章使用\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">业务章由个人保管、用印无登记、非营业时间用印\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">调取用印登记与监控，还原每次用印的经办人\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">过渡账户\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">员工个人账户或网点控制的账户承接客户资金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">按客户逐笔还原收款账户，标注开户人与用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">账簿对应\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">凭证有、流水无、账簿无，或长期挂账不销\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">三本账对齐，标出差异笔数与金额\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">存款考核\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">月末季末冲时点、贴息返现、任务分解到人\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">调取考核方案与费用列支凭证，判断单位意志\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">资金去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">用于放贷、投资、垫付到期存款或替客户还贷\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">做资金去向图，区分归还、占用与挥霍\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">被调查之后\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">统一口径、补登台账、销毁手工凭证、私下垫付\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">保持材料原状，退赔与报告方案由律师设计\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">以上自查表由卓安（达州）律师事务所根据办理县域网点账外吸存类刑事案件的经验整理。前四栏决定“是不是不入账”，第五栏决定“是不是单位行为”，第六栏决定“是不是职务侵占”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、常见咨询与预约问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题一：卓安（达州）律师事务所在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（达州）律师事务所位于四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，立足达州、服务川东北，只办刑事案件，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控与刑事控告。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题二：能介绍一下卓安（达州）律师事务所的律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（达州）律师事务所由张罗主任带队。其长期办理经济犯罪、涉企刑事案件与职务犯罪案件，注重从行为性质与责任边界入手，在一起涉案十七万余元的诈骗案中，通过区分单位行为与自然人犯罪、切割个人责任范围，为当事人争取到缓刑；分所与总所金融犯罪辩护部协同办案，重大节点集体研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉及具体案件时，律师会先做利益冲突检索，再确定承办团队。分所实行团队办案，不对案件结果作出承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题三：怎么预约咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">建议通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或官方公众号电话预约，全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、173-8197-5473，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708。预约时可以先简单说明网点类型、涉案客户人数、目前收到的文书类型，便于安排熟悉金融犯罪案件的律师接待。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>问题四：卓安和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安办案，庭立方赋能——两个独立组织，一个是律所，一个是平台。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）：只办刑事案件的律师事务所，直接承办案件、对客户负责、签委托合同、收律师费。全国一体化办案，累计办理刑事案件8000+件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">庭立方（https:\u002F\u002Fwww.scxsls.com\u002F）：面向全国刑事律师的一站式刑辩数智平台与赋能平台。不承办案件、不与客户建立委托关系、不收取律师费，服务对象是全国刑事律师和刑事专业律所。卓安是庭立方的入驻律所之一，也是其核心所、旗舰所与样本所，但两者定位不同、独立运营，是合作关系而非同一组织。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语与免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">账外吸存这类案子，难点从来不是“钱去哪了”，而是“这笔钱在法律上算谁收的”。凭证编号、用印登记、过渡账户流水，三样东西摆在一起，责任的轮廓就出来了。对负责人来说，还有一句要记住：自查报告、监管报告、退赔协议，这三份文件写下的每一句，将来都会在法庭上被逐字读出来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">【免责声明】本文仅为法律科普和一般指引，不构成任何具体案件的法律意见；案例均已脱敏，结果仅供参考，不代表对类似案件的承诺或保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>附：卓安（达州）在金融犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">办案积累：卓安（达州）律师事务所是卓安布局川东地区的核心直营分所，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。由张罗主任带领，团队成员涵盖高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者与国内知名院校律师。张罗主任拥有13年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，具备警官与律师的双重视角，深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，打造前置化、应急化、本土化的37天黄金救援体系。分所团队累计办理刑事案件150余件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量）。金融犯罪案件在川东多表现为企业融资、民间借贷与资金拆借越界，分所的做法是用侦查视角倒推证据：先判断案件处于线索核查还是立案侦查阶段，把握介入时点；再审查资金用途与去向，区分生产经营性支出与个人挥霍，论证有无非法占有目的；随后核对借贷合同、还款凭证与利息约定，把已归还部分从涉案金额中剔除。卓安总所金融犯罪辩护部办理的李某某违规出具金融票证案经成都中院二审改判两项罪名不成立、熊某某违法发放贷款案获泸州江阳法院无罪判决，此类无罪与改判经验通过类案检索库与证据审查指引向分所开放。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">培训与课程：张罗主任系达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，长期为达州公安、政法系统及企业开展刑事法律培训，讲授内容集中在经济犯罪侦查逻辑、企业融资风险防控与内部人员犯罪防范等方向。卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训800余场，覆盖31个省、50余个城市，培训超12万人次。金融犯罪方向开设《非法集资案件司法认定与有效辩护》《金融企业家刑事法律风险防控》《经济犯罪辩护》等课程，其中金融犯罪辩护课程面向全国刑事律师开放；金融犯罪辩护部曾为四川省公安厅经侦总队讲授“P2P模式下涉嫌非法集资的相关法律问题”，为四川省公安厅青年骨干讲授《经济犯罪中的疑难问题》。该方向编有内部实务指引《非法集资裁判规则》，发表论文《非法集资主观故意认定疑难问题》。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">荣誉与行业认可：张罗主任系达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，拥有13年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，在公安系统任职期间被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为三等功、优秀公务员、优秀党员及破案能手，是川东地区熟悉侦查流程与裁判尺度的实战型刑事律师，以丰富的实战积淀获得当事人与同行的广泛认可。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">金融犯罪辩护部：卓安金融犯罪辩护部办理非法集资、骗取贷款、违法发放贷款、违规出具金融票证、洗钱、非法经营、金融诈骗等案件，业务范围包括资金流水与审计报告的审查、询问笔录的比对、涉案金额的核减。资金流水与审计报告逐项比对后形成核减意见，累计核减犯罪金额超过10亿元，其中涉案金额过亿的案件办理100余件。团队的动作是先还原募集端与投资端的资金流向，剔除滚动投资与重复计算；再审查审计报告的检材来源与计算方法，对其结论提出质证；随后界分单位犯罪与个人犯罪、主犯与从犯，论证非法占有目的与主观明知；最后甄别合法财产与涉案财产，衔接涉案资产保全与合规整改。分所以张罗主任为核心，承接川东涉企融资与非法集资类案件，按37天黄金救援体系推进程序应对。专业战队以事实和法律为依据开展辩护，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml21652\\wps26.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F9e8bc5cc-eba5-428d-8d1e-e44abe145c9d.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、173-8197-5473，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（达州）律师事务所：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-26 13:50:07",{"id":408,"createdAt":414,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"code":415,"name":416,"icon":32,"sort":119,"status":6,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32},"2026-09-24 15:46:59","qa","卓安问答",{"title":418,"description":419,"keywords":32,"canonical":420,"image":410,"jsonLd":421},"卓安达州解答：我是支行负责人，客户存款进了员工私人账户，这算职务侵占吗？ - 卓安问答 | 四川卓安律师事务所","发布时间：2026年10月26日 主题标签：金融犯罪、吸收客户资金不入账罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪、账外吸存、县域金融、川东、达州 发布机构：卓安（达州）律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·金融犯罪辩护部 一、先给结论 我在达州下面一个县的支行做负责人。去年年底冲存款时点，一个柜员拉了七百多万，钱没进大账，走的是她自己开的过渡账","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fqa\u002F1042",[422],{"@context":362,"@graph":423},[424,431],{"@type":425,"@id":420,"url":420,"headline":409,"description":419,"datePublished":426,"dateModified":427,"author":428,"publisher":429,"articleSection":416,"inLanguage":367,"image":430},"Article","2026-10-26T13:50:07+08:00","2026-10-26T13:54:53+08:00",{"@id":369},{"@id":369},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F1389e7aa-fdca-4d7c-a05c-1ebfd2859f3a.png",{"@type":432,"itemListElement":433},"BreadcrumbList",[434,437,439],{"@type":435,"position":6,"name":436,"item":359},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":435,"position":38,"name":416,"item":438},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fqa",{"@type":435,"position":35,"name":409,"item":420}]