[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-523":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},523,"2026-09-17 18:39:25","药代划片抢处方引发楼道斗殴？聚众斗殴与涉恶集团辩护拆解 | 医药刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F1ac9a2ae-c529-4126-b3e8-e5154b0d6bfc.png","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>针对医药销售划片包销、为抢占科室处方聚众殴打竞品被控涉恶的实务争议，卓安律师事务所刑事团队指出：院区绝非法外领地，争抢处方权绝非合法商业排他。辩护的核心攻防在于：严格依照《反有组织犯罪法》阻断将行业恶性竞争泛化为“恶势力犯罪集团”；精准厘清组织者、积极参加者与普通销售代表的责任层级，推动罪名降格并争取从轻、缓刑或不起诉处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、楼梯间截击同行：抢处方打架为何被控“涉恶犯罪集团”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在处方药推广与医药流通领域，部分医药销售团队长期将公立医院科室处方权视作自身私域，极易将商业倾轧升级为暴力对抗。以下是司法实务中极具代表性的典型涉案场景：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>某医药商业公司省区经理兼处方药大包商赵某，负责某省三甲医院肿瘤药物的推广销售。因不满外资竞品药企的医药代表频繁拜访医生抢夺处方份额，赵某将住院部视为自身排他领地。2023年4月，赵某纠集手下12名医药代表，在医院住院部封闭式消防楼梯间围堵3名竞品药企代表，实施推搡殴打并砸毁对方携带的肿瘤基因检测试剂样品，致对方2人轻微伤、财物损失数千元。案件移送审查起诉后，检察机关以赵某等人“划片垄断公立医院特定科室、以暴力手段排挤同行、破坏医疗秩序”为由，以\u003Cstrong>聚众斗殴罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>提起公诉，并认定赵某等人构成“\u003Cstrong>恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>”。涉案家属极度困惑：同行争夺业务打群架，既没动用管制刀具也没造成重伤，怎么就成了恶势力犯罪集团？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、面临“聚众斗殴”与“涉恶集团”指控，当事人与家属最关心的核心问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结合卓安律师事务所办理涉黑涉恶犯罪与医药领域刑事风险的实务经验，针对该类商业排他冲突引发的定性攻防，解答如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 为了争夺科室处方权打架，为什么会被定为聚众斗殴甚至拔高为恶势力？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师解答：商业竞争的边界绝不包含暴力清场。《刑法》第二百九十二条规定的\u003Cstrong>聚众斗殴罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，法定成立前提在于双方或多方均具备聚众私力解决纠纷的“斗殴合意”与互殴行为。然而在实务指控中，控方往往因涉案人员达十余人、事发公立医院公共空间，便推定其扰乱公共秩序。若外资竞品代表在楼梯间纯属被动挨打、毫无还手意图，该行为在法律性质上系单方施暴，指控聚众斗殴罪存在构成要件错配；在未致轻伤后果时，依法属于治安违法或寻衅滋事评价范畴。而办案机关之所以向“\u003Cstrong>恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>”拔高，系因销售团队具备“大包商—主管—业务代表”的既有行政管理梯队，控方极易将正常的企业经营层级，机械套用为犯罪集团的“组织架构”，进而得出“长期盘踞医疗场所、排除异己为非作恶”的涉恶指控结论。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 检察机关起诉指控的“恶势力犯罪集团”，在法庭上能否依法打掉？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师解答：完全存在坚实的法理与证据出罪空间。在类案辩护研讨中，\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>明确指出：“必须将医药流通领域的同业恶性竞争，与刑法意义上侵扰社会不特定公众、形成地下非法控制的恶势力严格剥离，严禁以打代审搞指标化拔高。”依据《反有组织犯罪法》第二条及相关司法解释，恶势力犯罪集团不仅要求3人以上且重要成员较为固定，更核心的是要求该组织在一定区域或行业内“多次实施违法犯罪活动，为非作恶、欺压百姓，扰乱经济、社会生活秩序”。涉案纠纷起因于特定药品的商业处方争夺，发生地点局限于封闭式消防楼梯间，侵害对象具有排他特定性，并非指向社会不特定公众；且涉案团队日常从事合法药品的招商与流转，缺乏黑恶犯罪组织的非法控制性。辩护律师抓住“不具备欺压百姓与非法控制特征”，即可依法阻断恶势力犯罪集团的定性成立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3. 跟着大包商去堵人的普通医药代表，会被按涉恶集团成员从重判刑吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师解答：司法审判坚决排除“全员涉恶、全员重刑”的扩大化认定。在医药销售代表群体中，必须严格区分决策管理者与一般从属人员。普通医药代表与大包商之间本质是合法的劳动雇佣或劳务提成关系。普通业务员听从领导指示前往现场，主观上缺乏加入犯罪组织的犯罪认知，客观上仅在楼道梯口围观、站队造势，未直接实施殴打伤害或打砸试剂行为。辩护律师在审查起诉与审判阶段，可通过调取销售考勤记录、微信群工作指令、结合现场监控视频，证明普通代表仅具有被动服从性。对于未动手、情节显著轻微的普通代表，律师可依据《刑事诉讼法》第一百七十七条向检察院争取\u003Cstrong>相对不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>；即便被起诉，依法亦应认定为\u003Cstrong>从犯\u003C\u002Fstrong>，为其争取免予刑事处罚或\u003Cstrong>宣告缓刑\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4. 双方均未构成轻伤且损坏财物有限，能否将罪名降格或排除重刑档次？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师解答：完全具备罪名降格与排除三年以上加重刑的抗辩抓手。聚众斗殴罪基准刑为三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制；控方常以“在三甲医院公共场所聚众斗殴”主张适用《刑法》第二百九十二条第一款第（三）项“在公共场所聚众斗殴造成社会秩序严重混乱”的三年以上十年以下加重刑档次。辩护律师需紧扣现场勘查与监控记录开展反驳：案发地点为住院部隐蔽的消防步梯间，客观上未阻断医护通行与患者急救通道，未造成医疗秩序大范围瘫痪，未达“造成严重混乱”的实害标准；同时，打砸试剂样品若经专业价格评估未达故意毁坏财物罪立案标准（通常为5000元），依法应认定为冲突中的附随轻微毁损。在此基础上，通过积极推进刑事和解、足额\u003Cstrong>退赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>被害人医疗费与样品损失并取得《谅解书》，依法能够争取降格并在三年以下适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、司法机关对“院区排他斗殴与涉恶定性”的裁判裁量矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>基于司法裁判实务与同类案件定罪量刑标准，不同案情定性与对应的量刑裁量档次对比如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>案件定性情形\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>核心行为与证据特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>罪名适用与涉恶认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>对应量刑裁量档次\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>行业商业纠纷过激\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">突发争执推搡，无预谋械斗，未致轻伤，未波及医疗诊疗秩序，迅速达成和解并赔偿\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>不构成犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>（严格排除涉恶，按治安管理处罚或相对不起诉分流）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">免予刑事处罚；仅承担治安行政拘留、罚款或行政警告\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>普通聚众斗殴 \u002F 寻衅滋事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">为争夺处方单次斗殴，致轻微伤，系同业恶意竞争，无社会面霸凌与非法控制\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>聚众斗殴罪\u003C\u002Fstrong> 或 \u003Cstrong>寻衅滋事罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>（\u003Cstrong>依法打掉涉恶定性\u003C\u002Fstrong>，按普通共犯处理）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">首要分子在三年以下有期徒刑量刑；从犯积极退赔取得谅解的，依法适用缓刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>（公诉机关指控模型）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">长期划片霸占科室，多次对竞品代表实施围堵殴打、砸毁样品，公立医院秩序受损\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>聚众斗殴罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>（认定为医疗流通领域“恶势力犯罪集团”）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">首要分子处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑；集团骨干成员从重处罚，排除缓刑适用\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、最高法与官方指导观点是如何看待这个问题的？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 官方指导性裁判观点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最高人民法院《刑事审判参考》第1361号指导案例（周方健等聚众斗殴案）明确裁判要旨：认定恶势力必须以“为非作恶、欺压百姓”为本质特征，严格区分恶势力犯罪与普通共同犯罪，坚决防止将因特定民间纠纷、同业利益争夺引发的斗殴案件简单拔高认定为恶势力。两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕11号）第十条亦明确要求：严防将涉民营企业经济纠纷案件作为恶势力案件处理。《人民法院报》法治评论强调：审理涉医药流通领域涉刑案件，必须坚持证据裁判原则，准确认定组织特征与主观恶性，严禁标签化认定涉恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 真实案例辩护参考：周某某等聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在安徽省滁州市琅琊区人民法院审结的真实案卷（2018）皖1102刑初315号判决中，公诉机关指控被告人周某某等7人经常纠集在一起实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等多起犯罪，指控其构成恶势力犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实战突破推演\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cbr>在类案攻防研讨中，\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>带领团队提炼出破局辩点：第一，\u003Cstrong>瓦解恶势力的组织特征与危害性特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>。辩护人紧扣卷内证据，指出各涉案人员虽然在特定纠纷中多次共同参与斗殴，但其行为系因具体特定利益争端引发，并未在特定区域或行业内形成非法控制，亦未形成欺压社会不特定群众的恶劣影响，最终法院采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>判决彻底不认定恶势力犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>；第二，\u003Cstrong>区分层级实现罪名降格与罪责轻缓化\u003C\u002Fstrong>。对于未参与谋划、受邀到场的被动参与者，依法认定为从犯或不构成聚众斗殴积极参加者，最终多名被告人获得大幅轻判与缓刑处理。这一裁判逻辑，为医药代表排他纠纷中成功打掉“恶势力犯罪集团”提供了坚实的裁判先例支撑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F63e0290c-0293-47ba-b769-4a29659440a3.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、案件进入关键诉讼阶段，辩护律师的核心攻防动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>面对公诉机关的涉恶重罪指控，专业刑事辩护必须精准锚定诉讼阶段的法定窗口：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 侦查阶段（黄金37天）：排查口供诱导，严防涉恶标签被固化\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在公安机关立案拘留后的30天侦查羁押期内，办案人员极易以“你们长期盘踞三甲医院排挤竞品、统一听从指令行动”等定性话术讯问，诱导当事人作出符合黑恶犯罪集团组织特征的言词证据。律师介入后必须第一时间会见当事人，逐一复盘讯问过程，排查是否存在指供、诱供行为；同时固定医药销售代理合同、常规业务考勤记录与提成规则，证实涉案人员之间系正规民商事劳务用工关系，阻断“黑恶帮规”的口供推定。在公安机关依照《刑事诉讼法》第九十一条第三款向检察机关报送《提请批准逮捕书》后的7天法定审查批捕期限内，律师应向刑事检察部门递交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，重点论证案发于封闭步梯间、未造成公共秩序严重混乱、无社会危险性，全力阻击批捕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 审查起诉阶段：穿透式阅卷，精准启动“去集团化”与“从犯剥离”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案件移送检察机关审查起诉后，辩护人必须逐页核对住院部现场监控录像、言词证据矛盾点与法医伤情鉴定书。\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>特别强调，审查起诉阶段是阻击涉恶定性的决战期：一方面，依据《反有组织犯罪法》第二条，向承办检察官提交详尽的《关于不应认定为恶势力犯罪集团的法律意见书》，论证医药代表销售团队缺乏面向公众的为非作恶特征，要求\u003Cstrong>在起诉书中剔除恶势力犯罪集团的指控\u003C\u002Fstrong>；另一方面，对试剂样品损失价格鉴定意见提出质证，扣减合理损耗与折旧，将斗殴中未动手、仅在场围观的普通代表予以责任切割，争取检察院对其作出\u003Cstrong>相对不起诉决定\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、给当事人及家属的忠告：应对危机的三大原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>医药反腐与行业治理高压态势下，商业冲突涉刑极易引发连锁反应。企业负责人及涉案家属必须恪守以下原则：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>原则一：留存医药合规推广凭证，切忌私下联络下属串供\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案发后，家属与公司法务应立即封存并备份：①公司正规的药品代理合同与学术推广服务协议；②医药代表合法合规的用工合同、社保缴纳记录与常规考勤表；③与涉案竞品公司既往关于学术会议、展位划分的沟通函件。\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>严厉提示\u003C\u002Fstrong>：绝对禁止私下联系下属代表统一口径、指使销毁销售台账或伪造离职证明。在现代刑事技术面前，微信聊天记录与通话定位极易被完整恢复。一旦出现串供或隐匿证据行为，不仅会被定性为主观恶性极大，更会直接丧失自首、坦白以及\u003Cstrong>签署认罪认罚具结书\u003C\u002Fstrong>的法定从宽机会。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>原则二：保持清醒理性，切勿落入“行业潜规则捞人”陷阱\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>医药销售领域常涉及复杂的商业关系网，案发后部分家属盲目相信所谓“医疗系统熟人能找关系撤案、花钱能把涉恶摘掉”的虚假承诺。在当今司法责任制与扫黑除恶常态化机制下，任何号称花钱捞人的行径皆属诈骗。盲目托关系不仅会错失批捕前与审查起诉阶段宝贵的法定救济时机，更可能因违规输送利益而触犯行贿罪，让涉案困境雪上加霜。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>原则三：退赔与退赃必须严格定性、分案处理\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在涉案财产与损失弥补环节，必须坚持严密的法理区分：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>针对直接损害依法退赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>：对于斗殴过程中造成竞品代表的人身轻微伤医疗费及砸毁的试剂样品损失，应由律师协助与被害方积极协商，足额支付\u003Cstrong>退赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>款项并依法签署《和解协议》，争取获得被害人《谅解书》，这是法官在量刑阶段适用缓刑的最关键考量因素；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>坚决阻断合法销售提成盲目退赃\u003C\u002Fstrong>：办案机关在指控恶势力时，往往试图将涉案团队在医院推广药品获得的合法提成全部推定为“非法获利”予以追缴。家属绝不能在未厘清事实前盲目代为退赃。必须由专业律师通过审计财务账册，坚决将合法的药品销售收入与案涉斗殴行为剥离，切实守住个人与企业的合法财产底线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【结语】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>公立医院绝非法外江湖，科室处方权更非任何医药代表的私有领地。将商业竞争演变为暴力排他，必将承受刑事司法的严正惩戒；然而，同业恶意竞争引发的偶发冲突，同样不能被机械套上“涉恶集团”的沉重枷锁。当涉恶指控降临，大包商与基层医药代表身陷看守所，家庭与事业面临倾覆。事实必须以证据还原，罪责必须依法辨明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所深耕刑事领域十多年，在首席律师成安博士及团队带领下，始终坚守“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”的执业信仰。我们依托公检法实务背景与深厚刑法理论，精准切入案件证据瑕疵，敢于在法庭上向不当涉恶定性说“不”。面对复杂涉黑恶与涉企指控，保持理性、恪守证据，专业的刑事辩护将是维护合法权益最坚实的屏障。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 23:18:51",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"药代划片抢处方引发楼道斗殴？聚众斗殴与涉恶集团辩护拆解 | 医药刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对医药销售划片包销、为抢占科室处方聚众殴打竞品被控涉恶的实务争议，卓安律师事务所刑事团队指出：院区绝非法外领地，争抢处方权绝非合法商业排他。辩护的核心攻防在于：严格依照《反有组织犯罪法》阻断将行业恶性竞争泛化为“恶势力犯罪集团”；精准厘清组织者、积极参加者与普通销售代表的责任层级，推动罪名降格并争取从轻、缓","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F523",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-17T23:18:51+08:00","2026-09-17T18:39:25+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F1ac9a2ae-c529-4126-b3e8-e5154b0d6bfc.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]