[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-524":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},524,"2026-09-17 18:39:25","医院雇特勤拦丧砸花圈定涉恶？职务履职与寻衅滋事辩护拆解 | 医药刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Ffb9357f8-90af-4297-8642-b418c4068bb3.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>针对医疗机构处置医患矛盾雇佣外部安保暴力控场被指控涉恶寻衅滋事的实务争议，卓安律师事务所刑事团队指出：维护就医秩序绝非私力施暴的豁免牌，雇佣打手压制家属已越过治安管理底线。辩护的核心攻防在于：严格甄别医院管理层的委托履职与安保现场暴力的犯意联络，阻断共犯推定；精准依据《反有组织犯罪法》剥离恶势力标签，推动罪名降格与从犯出罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、外包安保暴力清场：维持医院治安为何被定“涉恶寻衅”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在医疗纠纷处置过程中，部分医院因缺乏合规疏导渠道，企图依赖外部灰色力量快查快处，极易将职务防范异化为暴力对抗。以下是司法实务中极具代表性的高发涉案场景：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">某私立综合医院发生严重医疗纠纷致患者死亡，死者家属十余人在门诊大楼前拉横幅、摆放花圈哭诉维权，引发群众围观。分管副院长与保卫科长为防止就医秩序瘫痪及舆情扩散，紧急外包某第三方特勤安保公司进场“维持秩序”。该安保公司负责人纠集二十余名黑衣人员手持防暴盾牌冲入现场，强行将多名家属拖拽至后巷按倒控制，并当场打砸损毁全部花圈横幅，冲突中致2名家属轻微伤。公安机关立案侦查后，将副院长、保卫科长及安保负责人等全员刑事拘留，定性为医疗领域“以黑护院、暴力平事”的\u003Cstrong>恶势力犯罪团伙\u003C\u002Fstrong>，涉嫌\u003Cstrong>寻衅滋事罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>。医院管理层震惊困惑：花钱请专业安保维持正常医疗秩序，怎么成了涉恶犯罪？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、面临“外包暴力平事”与“涉恶”指控，当事人与家属最关心的核心问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">结合卓安律师事务所办理涉黑涉恶犯罪与涉医刑事案件的实务经验，针对该类极端医疗场景引发的定性争议解答如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 医院花钱请外包安保维持就医秩序，为什么副院长和保卫科长会被定为寻衅滋事罪共犯？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：委托意图与现场实行的脱节是阻断共犯的核心事实抓手。《刑法》第二百九十三条规定的\u003Cstrong>寻衅滋事罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，法定构成要件以行为人具有“无事生非、称霸耍威”的流氓动机为前提。依照最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕18号）第一条第三款，因特定纠纷实施殴打他人行为的，一般不认定为寻衅滋事。本案起因系死者家属堵门设灵，事出有因。医院管理层外包安保的初衷系防止急救通道被阻断，属于单位内部的安全管理职责；若管理层在合同与指令中严禁动手打人，而外包安保公司在现场擅自实施拖拽殴打，在刑法理论上属于安保人员的“\u003Cstrong>实行过限\u003C\u002Fstrong>”。控方以管理层在场即推定其具有共同犯罪故意属于客观归罪，辩护律师应紧扣合同约定与客观指令，阻断职务行为与暴力犯罪之间的因果链条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 外包安保公司为了履约动手打人家属，为什么会被公安直接认定为“恶势力犯罪团伙”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：商业履约中的单次暴力极易被办案机关标签化拔高。在类案辩护研讨中，\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>明确指出：“必须严格甄别民商事委托下的单次侵权过激，与刑法意义上经常纠集、为非作恶欺压百姓的恶势力犯罪组织，严防因涉案人数众多即机械认定涉恶。”依据《反有组织犯罪法》第二条及涉黑恶司法解释，恶势力的法定核心在于“经常纠集在一起，以暴力、威胁手段多次实施违法犯罪，在一定区域或行业内为非作恶、欺压百姓”。若该特勤安保公司具备合法工商登记，本起冲突系受托处置特定偶发事件激化所致，涉案人员日常并未以暴力平事为常业，在区域内更未形成非法控制，辩护律师抓住“不具备恶势力的组织性与多次性特征”，即可依法促使司法机关在起诉时彻底剔除恶势力定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 医院管理人员全程没有动手打人，在法庭上能否争取不起诉或无罪出罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：完全存在明确的事实出罪与从犯降格空间。在共同犯罪证据链中，必须证实组织者与实行犯具有明确的犯意联络。对于医院分管副院长及总务保卫科长而言，其并不参与具体的安保队伍编队与暴力器械配发。辩护律师在审查起诉阶段应全面调取与安保公司签订的《安保服务外包合同》、管理层内部审批流转记录以及案发时的微信工作群聊，重点证明医院合同中白纸黑字明确约定了“文明执勤、严禁动手打人、严格遵守法律底线”。安保人员现场打砸系单方过激行为，管理层缺乏事前伤害预谋与现场指挥指令，依法不应当承担寻衅滋事罪的刑事责任，律师可据此依法向检察机关力争\u003Cstrong>法定不予起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>或\u003Cstrong>相对不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 涉案安保公司及医院对公账户被大范围冻结，合法资产如何申请解封剥离？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：涉黑恶定性往往伴随着财产查封的泛化风险。依照《刑事诉讼法》第一百一十七条与第一百四十一条规定，司法机关查扣冻结的财产必须严格限于涉案财产及违法所得。医院日常合法的门诊医保结算资金、正常购买医疗物资的流动资金，以及安保公司合法的注册资本与其他正规安保服务合同回款，均属于受法律保护的合法民营财产。辩护律师需在侦查及审查起诉阶段及时提交《解除查封、扣押、冻结财产申请书》，出具专项财务审计核算单据，证实被冻结账户资金系合法经营结余，坚决阻断办案机关将合法财产推定为“黑恶势力经济基础”予以整体没收。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、司法机关对“涉医纠纷雇佣暴力涉刑”的裁判裁量矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">基于司法裁判实务与同类案件定罪量刑标准，不同案情定性与对应的量刑裁量档次对比如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">案件定性情形\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心行为与证据特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">罪名适用与涉恶认定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对应量刑裁量档次\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">职务履职过激 \u002F 治安纠纷\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">医院外包合同规范，指令明确文明处置，现场发生轻微肢体拉扯，未致人轻伤，未砸毁财物\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不构成犯罪（严格排除涉恶，按治安管理处罚或民事侵权分流）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">免予追究刑事责任；仅承担治安行政警告、罚款或民事赔偿责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">普通寻衅滋事罪（辩方阻断涉恶成功）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">现场发生拖拽、砸毁横幅花圈，致轻微伤，系单次医疗纠纷处置失控，无长期霸市行径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">寻衅滋事罪（依法打掉涉恶定性，按普通共同犯罪处理）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">首要分子处五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制；从犯积极退赔取得谅解的，依法适用缓刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">恶势力犯罪团伙 \u002F 集团（公诉机关指控模型）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">长期充当“医闹打击队”，多次受雇于医疗机构采取殴打、抢尸、围堵等暴力手段平事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数罪并罚（寻衅滋事罪+故意伤害罪等）（认定为“暴力平事”恶势力犯罪团伙）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纠集者及骨干分子处五年以上十年以下有期徒刑，严格排除缓刑适用并处高额罚金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、最高法与官方指导观点是如何看待这个问题的？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 官方指导性裁判观点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕18号）明确规定：行为人因特定纠纷实施殴打他人或损毁财物行为的，一般不认定为寻衅滋事；若被害人对矛盾激化负有责任，应严格限制构罪。《反有组织犯罪法》第二条及涉黑恶司法解释确立裁判红线：认定恶势力必须恪守“经常纠集、为非作恶、欺压百姓”法定标准，严防将企事业单位因偶发矛盾处置不当、雇佣第三方引发的民事治安纠纷不当拔高为恶势力犯罪。《人民法院报》法治评论强调：严禁将单位职务维权与黑恶暴力混同，坚决防止涉黑涉恶标签化泛化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 真实案例辩护参考：涉外包特勤人员处置突发纠纷涉恶案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在贵州省贵阳市南明区人民法院审结的（2020）黔0102刑初531号真实判决中，涉案单位在面临外部群体性矛盾激化时，外包社会特勤人员入场维稳，双方爆发肢体冲突导致人员轻微伤及物品损毁，公诉机关指控涉案管理人员与特勤队长共同构成恶势力寻衅滋事犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>实战突破推演\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cbr>在类案攻防研讨中，\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>指导专案团队切中案件命门：第一，\u003Cstrong>切断恶势力的组织特征链条\u003C\u002Fstrong>。辩护人紧扣证据卷宗，指出涉案安保人员系受合法委托提供安全管理，起因系具体偶发纠纷，不具备经常纠集实施违法犯罪的特征，更无在行业内称霸一方、欺压百姓的主观故意，法院最终采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>判决彻底剔除涉恶犯罪定性\u003C\u002Fstrong>；第二，\u003Cstrong>厘清委托范围与实行过限的因果界限\u003C\u002Fstrong>。辩护团队通过调取委托合同与现场监控视听资料，证实委托管理方未下达打人毁财指令，现场伤害系个别安保人员情绪激化导致的过限行为，最终成功为委托方管理人员实现责任剥离与从轻处罚。这一审判逻辑，为医疗机构管理人员在纠纷处置中阻断共同犯罪提供了坚实的先例支撑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Fd22fc195-e92f-4c3b-a1a5-eb221742b04b.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、案件进入关键诉讼阶段，辩护律师的核心攻防动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对公诉机关涉恶重罪的高压指控，专业刑事辩护必须精准锚定诉讼阶段的法定救济窗口：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 侦查阶段（黄金37天）：排查犯意联络，精准阻击涉恶批捕\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在公安机关立案侦查后的30天羁押期内，办案人员极易以“你们医院雇佣黑社会打手、有组织平事”等定性话术讯问，诱导管理层认领“共同谋划暴力清场”。律师介入后必须第一时间会见当事人，全流程复盘讯问过程，排查是否存在指供、诱供；同时指导管理层实事求是陈述外包安保的合规采购流程与权限范围，阻断“指使施暴”的口供推定。在公安机关依照《刑事诉讼法》第九十一条第三款向检察机关报送《提请批准逮捕书》后的7天审查批捕极限制约期内，律师应向刑事检察部门提交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，重点论证案发系事出有因的突发职务履职、医院管理层无伤害合意且无社会危险性，全力阻击批捕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 审查起诉阶段：穿透式阅卷，启动“去涉恶化”与“管理层责任剥离”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案件移送审查起诉后，辩护人必须逐帧比对医院门诊大厅、外围及后巷的监控视频与言词证据。\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>特别强调，审查起诉阶段是阻断泛恶化定性的最后关口：一方面，依据《反有组织犯罪法》第二条，向承办检察官提交详尽的《关于不应认定恶势力犯罪及管理层实行过限出罪的法律意见书》，论证医院与外包公司之间系平等的民事合同关系，不具备恶势力的组织特征与非法控制特征，要求\u003Cstrong>在起诉书中彻底剔除恶势力的定性指控\u003C\u002Fstrong>；另一方面，对砸毁花圈横幅的价格鉴定意见提出质证，若损毁数额无法达到寻衅滋事立案标准（2000元以上），坚决要求检察机关\u003Cstrong>在起诉书中剔除任意损毁财物的指控情节\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、给当事人及家属的忠告：应对危机的三大原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在常态化扫黑除恶与涉医秩序整饬的高压态势下，医疗机构涉刑往往面临极为严苛的审查。涉案管理人员及家属必须恪守以下实操底线：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>原则一：封存安保外包合同与现场录像，切忌擅自指使安保串供\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案发后，家属与医院法务留守人员应立即封存并备份：①医院与第三方安保公司签署的正规《特勤保安服务合同》与付款凭证；②医院总务保卫部门下发的内部安保工作规范与突发事件应急预案；③门诊楼前及冲突区域完整的原始监控录像硬盘，防止被覆盖。\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>严厉提示\u003C\u002Fstrong>：绝对禁止私下联系安保公司负责人订立攻守同盟、指使安保人员外逃或伪造现场巡逻日志。在当今成熟的公安刑侦技术与电子取证面前，串供与销毁证据的行为极易被当场识破，不仅会导致涉案人员被立刻采取强制措施，更会彻底丧失自首、坦白以及\u003Cstrong>签署认罪认罚具结书\u003C\u002Fstrong>的法定从宽机会。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>原则二：保持清醒理性，切勿相信“医疗卫生系统熟人平事”骗局\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">医院管理者日常多积累了一定行业人脉，案发后部分家属陷入慌乱，轻信所谓“能通过卫健委领导找公安分局打招呼撤案、花钱能把黑恶帽子摘掉”的谎言。在当前司法责任制与扫黑除恶常态化机制下，任何声称“花钱平事”的中间人均属诈骗。盲目托关系寻门路，不仅会白白耗尽企业应急资金、错失批捕前宝贵的黄金辩护窗口，更极易牵涉出行贿犯罪，导致涉案人员陷入新的刑罚漩涡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>原则三：退赔与退赃必须严格定性、分案处理\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉案资金与损失补偿的处置必须恪守严格的刑法法理红线：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>针对直接人身财产损害依法退赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>：对于安保人员在冲突中实际造成的家属人身轻微伤医疗费及砸毁的花圈横幅实际损失，应由辩护律师协助逐笔核实，依法向受害家属足额支付\u003Cstrong>退赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>款项，争取达成民事和解并取得《谅解书》，这是法官在判决阶段对涉案人员适用缓刑的最关键酌定从宽情节；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>坚决阻断正常安保服务费盲目退赃\u003C\u002Fstrong>：办案机关有时倾向于将医院支付给安保公司的整笔合法安保外包服务费全额推定为“黑恶犯罪活动资金”予以查扣追缴。家属绝不能在案情未明前盲目认缴退赃。必须由专业律师通过审计双方企业合规账册，将正常的企业外包经营款项与涉案非法开支严格切分，依法守住当事人的合法财产底线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【结语】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公立与民营医疗机构守护就医安宁是法定职责，但雇佣灰色暴力压制弱势患者家属，已然击穿依法化解医患矛盾的法治红线。然而，在常态化扫黑除恶的司法审查中，同样不能将企事业单位日常管理失范、安保履职过激引发的偶发治安冲突，随意政治化、标签化为恶势力犯罪。罪与非罪需要事实说话，责任轻重必须依靠证据严密界定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师事务所深耕刑事领域十多年，在首席律师成安博士及团队带领下，始终坚守“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”的执业信仰。我们依托公检法前实务经验与深厚刑辩功底，精准拆解复杂涉恶指控中的共同犯罪故意与组织特征，敢于向拔高定性据理力争。面对严峻刑事风暴，唯有保持理性、恪守证据，专业的刑事辩护才是维护当事人合法权益最坚实的屏障。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 23:20:15",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"医院雇特勤拦丧砸花圈定涉恶？职务履职与寻衅滋事辩护拆解 | 医药刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对医疗机构处置医患矛盾雇佣外部安保暴力控场被指控涉恶寻衅滋事的实务争议，卓安律师事务所刑事团队指出：维护就医秩序绝非私力施暴的豁免牌，雇佣打手压制家属已越过治安管理底线。辩护的核心攻防在于：严格甄别医院管理层的委托履职与安保现场暴力的犯意联络，阻断共犯推定；精准依据《反有组织犯罪法》剥离恶势力标签，推动罪名","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F524",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-17T23:20:15+08:00","2026-09-17T18:39:25+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Ffb9357f8-90af-4297-8642-b418c4068bb3.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]