[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-530":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},530,"2026-09-17 18:39:25","涉黑专案穿透离岸信托？自洗钱指控阻断与涉案财产甄别辩护 | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F1d69c5b5-e63c-4c0c-a9f2-7ca0e7977224.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对涉黑案件“打财断血”高压，办案机关常以追加自洗钱罪或拒执罪施压实控人汇回境外信托资产退赃。卓安律师事务所依托涉黑与涉案财产处置实务指出：境外离岸信托在刑事司法中并非不可穿透，但追缴必须以该财产确系“黑社会性质组织犯罪所得及其孳息”为法定前提。在侦查阶段以拒执罪、洗钱罪为由倒逼退赃缺乏实体法与程序法依据，家属切忌恐慌签署授权，应通过证据闭环坚决切断合法财产与涉案行为的关联。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、境外设立的不可撤销信托，专案组为何能“隔空击穿”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">民营企业实控人董某于十年前以实业经营积累通过开曼架构设立不可撤销家族信托，由境外持牌信托机构受托管理。2025年底，董某名下企业因多年前土地竞标与工程拆迁引发的强迫交易纠纷被卷入涉黑专案，其本人在境内被刑事拘留并批准逮捕。在冻结境内全部涉案关联账户后，专案组在提讯时向董某出示严厉告诫：若不配合签署《回汇授权书》将离岸信托内资产原路调回退缴，将在审查起诉阶段追加自洗钱罪和拒不执行判决、裁定罪，并向检察机关提出从严惩处、不予适用认罪认罚从宽制度的意见。面对人身羁押与刑期升格压力，企业家面临自行签字击穿信托民事防火墙的现实危机。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、遭遇“不汇回信托资产就加罪”，家属最关心的几个核心争议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">结合重大涉黑案件与涉案财产辩护经验，针对此类疑难复杂境遇，提供如下专业剖析：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 设立多年的不可撤销离岸信托，刑事司法中真能被强制没收吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：信托的民事法律独立性绝不能当然豁免刑事追缴，但刑事追缴受制于法定证据裁判原则。《反有组织犯罪法》及涉黑涉恶财产处置规定明确，追缴没收的客体严格限定在“违法犯罪所得及其孳息”。办案机关无法直接越境执行离岸受托人名下的财产，转而依托对境内委托人的人身控制权施压。然而，只要信托设立的时间节点显著早于指控的违法犯罪发生期，且原始资金链条完全对应早年合法实业经营所得，该笔资产依法属于当事人的合法财产，绝非法律意义上的“黑财”，不具备刑事没收的法定条件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 侦查人员警告“不汇回就定洗钱罪和拒执罪”，在法律上能否成立？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：在实体法和程序法上均无法成立，属于侦查策略中的心理震慑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>关于拒不执行判决、裁定罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>：依据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院出台生效的《关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2024〕13号），该罪的客观前提必须是行为人拒不执行“人民法院依法作出的具有执行内容并已发生法律效力的判决、裁定”。案件尚处于侦查阶段，连检察机关审查起诉尚未开始，根本不存在生效裁判文书，指控拒执罪属于严重的法律适用错误。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>关于洗钱罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>：依据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理洗钱刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2024〕10号），认定刑法第191条洗钱罪（含自洗钱），必须证明涉案资金系黑社会性质组织犯罪等七类上游犯罪的“犯罪所得及其收益”。若信托资金源于多年前合法经营所得，自始缺乏上游犯罪所得这一客体要件；且不愿汇回财产属于消极抗辩，不具备掩饰、隐瞒来源和性质的法定积极洗钱行为特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 专案组以“取消认罪认罚从宽”相要挟，当事人该不该妥协签署授权？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：绝不能违心妥协。认罪认罚具结权属于检察机关，侦查机关无权在侦查阶段单方剥夺法定从宽资格。更重要的是，在涉黑案件中退赃退赔具有明确指向性：向司法机关上缴违法所得称为“退赃”。当事人一旦在看守所内违心签署境外资金汇回退赃协议，公诉机关即可推定当事人已在客观上自认该离岸资产系涉黑违法所得。这种妥协不仅无法换取实质轻判，反而坐实了财产的涉黑属性，彻底丧失审判阶段的财产辩护空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 境内办案机关开始追查，家属能否直接指令境外信托机构套现转移？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：此举存在极高的次生刑事风险！部分家属恐慌之下试图利用离岸保护人机制变更受益人或指示受托人突击减资套现，往往在跨境金融监管体系下留下电子痕迹。一旦资金流转被查实，侦查机关极易以此认定家属构成《刑法》第312条“掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪”，导致涉案人员范围扩大化。此时唯一合法的应对动作，是由辩护律师在境内外依法固定信托合法来源的书证闭环，通过程序提出异议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、离岸信托财产与涉黑“黑财”的司法审查标准是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在扫黑除恶常态化背景下，司法机关对涉案财产处置遵循严格的法定甄别程序：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>(一) 财产穿透审查的核心标准：时间阻断与资金轨迹闭环\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉黑财产认定的法理根基是其“涉黑关联性”。在涉案财产辩护中，\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>指导团队归纳出关键抗辩规则：必须聚焦于“时间节点切割”与“底层资产性质穿透”。信托资产是否属于涉黑财产，核心看资金形成时间是否早于涉嫌强迫交易等犯罪行为发生期；若资金源于历史合法经营，必须提取当年《个人所得税完税凭证》、企业历次税后分红股东会决议及外汇管理核准文件，构建合法资金闭环。切断境外资产与被指控犯罪行为之间的资金关联，是推翻办案机关涉黑追缴推定的关键抓手。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>(二) 离岸信托资产涉黑刑事审查与处置对抗矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">基于卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪与重大经济犯罪辩护实战体系，涉案财产审查标准与裁量逻辑如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">资产涉案类型\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">控方审查重点与指控逻辑\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">辩方核心抗辩抓手与证据链\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对应法律定性与裁量后果\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纯粹合法信托资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">推定实控人所有境内外资产均由涉黑组织兜底滋养，主张一揽子没收\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">锁定信托设立时间早于指控犯罪发生期，出具ODI备案、税后分红完税凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">依法保护合法财产，不得追缴没收；阻断自洗钱罪与拒执罪指控\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">混合混同信托资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指控犯罪发生后企业资金与境外信托发生经常性往来，推定全额污染\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">申请司法会计审计，精确剥离违法所得注入本息与原有合法信托本金份额\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">仅依法追缴违法所得等值部分，原有合法信托资产依法予以保留返还\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">犯罪收益洗钱资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">查实将强迫交易违法所得通过地下钱庄或虚假跨境贸易注入境外信托\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查受托人独立性、主观明知要件及资金流转真实因果链条是否存在破裂\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">依法认定洗钱罪\u002F自洗钱罪，对违法所得通过国际司法协助依法追缴\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、司法机关与权威判例如何确立涉案财产跨境甄别规则？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在我国司法审判实践中，最高人民法院对涉黑财产处置有着严格的证据裁判红线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 官方指导性裁判观点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高人民法院指导案例96号（庞宝荣等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案，案号：(2014)冀刑三终字第136号）裁判要旨明确确立：“处理涉案财产时，应当对财产的来源、性质进行严格审查，属于黑社会性质组织聚敛的财产及其收益的，依法予以追缴、没收；对合法财产依法予以返还。”《反有组织犯罪法》第45条与最高人民法院涉黑涉恶财产处置司法文件亦明确强调：必须严格区分违法所得与合法财产、组织成员个人财产与家庭成员共有财产，严禁因涉黑指控而对当事人案发前的合法投资与家庭信托财产搞“全盘没收”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 卓安律师事务所实战辩护参考：董某涉黑案涉案资产与重罪有效剥离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在卓安律师事务所承办的涉黑重案——董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪一案（由成安律师团队承办）中：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护突破\u003C\u002Fstrong>：面对指控董某参与拆迁、聚众扰乱社会秩序并获取非法利益的严峻指控，\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>在把关整体辩护逻辑时，明确将“指控违法行为与当事人承揽工程的合法结算款相剥离”作为核心抓手。律师团队对上千页案卷逐页比对资金流水，有力论证了涉案款项属于合法工程劳务对价，并非敲诈勒索非法所得，依法打破了将合法资产一律归入犯罪收益的控方推定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>判决结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>：成都市中级人民法院一审充分采纳了律师关于过激催收系民事欠款纠纷引发、主观上无非法占有目的的辩护意见，对核心重罪予以法定从轻裁量，实现了全案量刑的大幅度降低。该案的成功办理印证了：在涉黑涉恶重案中，唯有通过精细化的事实还原与财产属性剖析，方能粉碎控方的涉黑涉案推定，保住合法民商事资产底线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Fff8a5214-e858-4a2f-9dab-1936107a3af9.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、侦查与审查起诉阶段，辩护律师如何构筑涉案财产阻断防线？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">针对侦查机关追加罪名施压退缴离岸信托的操作，专业辩护律师必须将质证防线全面前置：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 调取讯问同步录音录像，排除非自愿言词证据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">正如\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>在指导涉黑专案攻防时反复指出，财产辩护的关键防线在于防止不利口供在侦查阶段固化。辩护律师介入后，应通过高频评估性会见指导当事人行使法定陈述权，核对讯问笔录与真实陈述的一致性。进入审查起诉阶段后，立即向检察机关申请调取全部讯问同步录音录像，核查侦查人员是否存在以“取消认罪认罚”“全家追加洗钱罪”等威胁方式强迫签署授权书的情形。一旦查实存在非法取证瑕疵，依法提起非法证据排除申请，斩断不利口供效力。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 构建早期合法财产书证链，出具审计阻断意见\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">财产性质甄别属于客观证据对抗。辩护律师需指导家属全面归集当事人早期设立信托的完整闭环证据：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>信托设立审批文件、国家外汇管理局境外直接投资（ODI）核准批文或合规申报凭证；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>信托资金注入当期所依托国内企业的年度审计报告、股东会分红决议；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>税务机关出具的个人所得税完税证明，证明资金属于完税后的合法经营收益；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>境外受托人开立的底层资金托管对账单，证明设立后未与国内指控的犯罪资金产生交织。通过上述客观证据出具《司法会计证据穿透报告》，彻底阻断侦查机关将境外资产定性为黑财的逻辑链条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 向检察院递交《涉案财产排除意见书》\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在案件移送审查起诉前后的关键窗口期，律师应主动约见承办检察官，递交书面《涉案财产排除意见书》。从实体上阐明信托财产缺乏涉黑犯罪收益属性、不构成自洗钱罪客观客体的法理，从程序上指出侦查阶段适用拒执罪的法定前置要件缺失，建议检察机关在起诉书中对该笔境外离岸信托资产予以明确排除，不列入涉案财产追缴清单。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、面对追缴施压与加罪警告，当事人及家属应当坚守的三大原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对高压办案环境，场内外当事人与家属的应对抉择直接决定了最终财产与自由的归宿：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>(一) 拒绝恐慌授权：严禁在未完成财产甄别前盲目签字汇回\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">羁押状态下，当事人常在信息隔绝中产生“交钱买平安”的非理性冲动。必须高度警惕：向办案机关退缴违法所得称为“退赃”。在司法机关尚未完成财产审计甄别前盲目签字将信托资金调回国内，实质上是以行动自认该资金系涉案黑财。家属切忌在场外盲从妥协，一切财产性质定性必须以客观司法审计与专业律师阅卷质证为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>(二) 依法启动救济：作为利害关系人提起书面财产异议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据《反有组织犯罪法》及刑事诉讼相关规定，信托委托人、受益人作为涉案财物利害关系人，有权在诉讼全过程中对不当查封、冻结、划扣主张独立权利。家属应在专业律师指导下，依法向办案机关与检察机关递交《利害关系人涉案财产异议申请书》，要求对涉案财物进行单独登记、妥善保管，并申请启动羁押必要性审查，倒逼办案机关回归证据裁判轨道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>(三) 保持理性自律：切勿轻信“境外捞人”与特权通道骗局\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉黑重大专案实行严格的异地用警与挂牌督办机制。在面临高压追缴时，任何宣称“拥有特殊渠道可免予追缴离岸信托”、“交赞助费能放人”的说辞均系诈骗犯罪。轻信违规捞人不仅会造成家族资产二次流失，更可能触犯行贿、串供等妨害司法罪名，彻底摧毁正常的刑事抗辩防线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【结语】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">人类最需要同类伸出援手的地方，除了医院，就是法庭。当刑事司法风暴伴随“打财断血”席卷而来，企业家的生命自由与多年积累的家族财富均面临严峻考验。但请深信：事实可以穿透，财产可以甄别，法律可以争辩。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉黑案件中的涉案财产辩护是一项融合了刑事诉讼法、刑法要件论与跨境信托金融架构的高难度对抗实务。它要求辩护人既深谙公安经侦与公诉机关的穿透追缴逻辑，又能娴熟运用证据规则构筑财产防御工事。卓安律师事务所作为全国专注于刑事领域的专业化精品律所，在首席律师\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>带领下，深耕刑事辩护十多年，始终践行“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”的执业信念。面对跨境资产穿透与重罪极限施压，我们依托四维办案视角与深厚实战积淀，全力守护当事人的自由底线与合法财产安全。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 23:32:21",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"涉黑专案穿透离岸信托？自洗钱指控阻断与涉案财产甄别辩护 | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 面对涉黑案件“打财断血”高压，办案机关常以追加自洗钱罪或拒执罪施压实控人汇回境外信托资产退赃。卓安律师事务所依托涉黑与涉案财产处置实务指出：境外离岸信托在刑事司法中并非不可穿透，但追缴必须以该财产确系“黑社会性质组织犯罪所得及其孳息”为法定前提。在侦查阶段以拒执罪、洗钱罪为由倒逼退赃缺乏实体法与程序法依据，家","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F530",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-17T23:32:21+08:00","2026-09-17T18:39:25+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F1d69c5b5-e63c-4c0c-a9f2-7ca0e7977224.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]