[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-531":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},531,"2026-09-17 18:39:25","没拿钱算保护伞吗？提醒涉恶老板潜逃，专班干部如何阻断重罪？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F5b9c2dc4-1403-4c77-80ab-998438b12a24.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>针对政法专班借调干部“未收分文仅凭私交微信提醒，致涉案人毁证潜逃”的定罪争议，卓安律师事务所基于职务犯罪实务指出：刑法第417条不以牟利为构成要件，泄露初核线索极易被认定为通风报信。辩护的核心攻防焦点在于：一是穿透审查借调岗位的具体查禁职责权限；二是坚决切断与涉黑组织的利益关联，阻断“涉黑保护伞”及“情节严重”的升档指控，守住三年以下法定刑防线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、一句私交人情提醒，借调干部为何反被扣上“保护伞”采取强制措施？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">某地政法委借调干部赵某，在协助扫黑除恶专班筹备工作会议期间，翻阅涉密线索汇编材料时偶然发现好友民企老板钱某的公司已被列入涉恶初核名单。赵某自恃交情深厚且分文未收，私下通过微信向钱某发送语音提醒：“最近别太招摇，把外面的纠纷平一平。”钱某闻讯当晚连夜转移销毁公司关键财务账册并潜逃外省。次日专案倒查案发，纪检监察机关依法对赵某立案调查并采取\u003Cstrong>留置措施\u003C\u002Fstrong>；调查终结移送审查起诉后，检察机关对赵某依法决定采取\u003Cstrong>先行拘留\u003C\u002Fstrong>等刑事强制措施。面对“涉黑恶内鬼保护伞”的定性指控，家属深感冤屈：既没收一分钱，又只是发了句隐晦的人情提醒，难道真要换来数年重刑牢狱？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、遇到“没拿钱却涉嫌包庇”的情况，大家最疑惑的几个现实问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">结合公职人员涉案与职务犯罪辩护实务，我们将当事人及家属最关切的核心疑问逐一拆解：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 我一分钱都没收，怎么就构成了帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>卓安律师解答：普通人常误以为“收了黑钱才叫保护伞”，但刑法第417条\u003Cstrong>帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>属于典型的纯正渎职犯罪，其犯罪构成\u003Cstrong>完全不以“收受财物”或“牟取非法利益”为法定要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>。只要行为人具备法定的查禁犯罪活动职责，客观上实施了通风报信、提供便利的行为，主观上明知对方涉嫌犯罪仍促使其逃避查禁，无论动机是出于私交情面、亲友托请还是侥幸心理，均已触犯该罪红线。有无收受财物，法律上仅用于区分单纯渎职还是与\u003Cstrong>受贿罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>数罪并罚，以及在量刑时作为酌定从宽考量的情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 我只是发了句含糊提醒，对方自己逃跑毁证，责任全算在我头上吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>卓安律师解答：这正是审查起诉阶段与庭审质证对抗的核心焦点。刑法上的通风报信，要求泄密行为与犯罪嫌疑人产生脱逃、毁证后果之间具备\u003Cstrong>排他性的直接因果关系\u003C\u002Fstrong>。控方的指控逻辑往往是“以案后推导案前”，根据钱某当晚潜逃的结果，推定赵某的微信提醒就是通风报信。但辩方的有效反制抓手在于：必须严格审查微信言论的具体内容。如果信息中并未泄露核查线索、办案力量调配、抓捕时机等核心办案秘密，且结合全案证据发现涉案老板此前已因其他同案人员被查、监管部门突击检查等外部风声产生逃匿预谋，辩护律师即可通过《电子数据检验报告》的上下文比对，从“主观故意不明知”与“因果链条中断”两大致命断点切断控方指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 我只是临时借调会务人员，也算“有查禁犯罪活动职责”的国家机关工作人员吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>卓安律师解答：不能一概而论，这是本案实现“出罪”或“降格”的最大辩护空间。刑法第417条的主体具有身份法定性，司法实务严格限定于具有查禁职责的公检法干警、行政执法人员及正式承担案件核查职责的专案组成员。对于仅借调负责后勤保障、收发文电、会议记录等综合行政工作的辅助人员，不能仅因其物理上处于专班办公场所，就推导其当然具备“查禁犯罪活动”法定职责。\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>在把关此类案件时指出：辩护人必须第一时间向办案机关调取《干部抽调通知》《岗位职责清单》及《工作分工纪要》，严格剥离“岗位保密义务”与“法定查禁职责”，论证其主体资格不适格，全力推动将案件降格为违反工作纪律的行政纪律处分，阻断刑事追诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 被办案机关扣上涉黑涉恶“保护伞”，量刑一定会顶格判三年以上吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>卓安律师解答：绝非必然。帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪的基础法定刑为三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；仅在达到“情节严重”时，才升档处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑。在扫黑除恶常态化背景下，办案机关常因涉案对象具有涉恶属性，而倾向于按“情节严重”顶格提出量刑建议。辩护律师在此阶段的核心使命，就是建立防线：紧扣赵某未收受贿赂、未参与分红、与涉恶团伙无长期利益绑定等客观事实，坚决阻断将其定性为涉黑恶组织“保护伞”加重档次，将案情牢牢锚定在三年以下基准刑区间，并全力为当事人争取免予刑事处罚或适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>5. 案件还在侦查调查阶段，家属在外到底该做什么、绝不能做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>卓安律师解答：此时最忌慌乱中的错误自救。\u003Cstrong>第一，绝对禁止私下联络涉案老板家属或专班前同事对口径\u003C\u002Fstrong>。专案组会对通信记录实施穿透式追查，任何私下接触都会被监察机关与检察机关认定为“串供伪证”，直接摧毁坦白、自首及认罪认罚从宽的基础；\u003Cstrong>第二，坚决杜绝轻信各类宣称“能找关系捞人”的司法掮客\u003C\u002Fstrong>。涉黑恶专案实行全流程纪检监察组驻点监督，跨部门倒查机制极严，所谓花钱运作百分之百属于诈骗；\u003Cstrong>第三，切勿盲目向办案机关代为退赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>。当事人既然未收受财物，在法律上就没有任何“违法所得”需要上缴，盲目交钱只会在公诉人面前造成自认受贿的被动局面。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、法院判决的真实标准是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）定性：严守职责边界与主客观一致，防止泛化认定“保护伞”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在司法实务中，审判机关对公职人员涉案定罪必须贯彻主客观相一致原则。\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>在带领团队处理公职人员职务侵权与渎职案件时提出“主体法定职责核验—信息密级实质审查—证据灭失排他性阻断”的三层防御体系。成安律师强调：涉案民营企业的涉恶性质绝不能反向推定借调干部的恶性程度，公职人员是否入罪，关键在于审查其岗位职权是否涵盖查禁犯罪的核心权力，以及其言论是否实质性瓦解了国家的追诉权能。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）定量：跑风漏气涉案行为与定性量刑对照矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">基于卓安律师事务所十多年的职务犯罪与涉黑涉恶辩护实务积累，司法机关对“跑风漏气”类案的定性与量刑阶梯标准如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">案件情形与行为特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心法律特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">追诉罪名与加重档次\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对应法定刑及量刑幅度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">事务辅助过失走漏风声无查禁办案职责的后勤会务借调人员，因私交闲聊失言，未收财物，未造成追捕实质受阻\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不具备法定查禁职责；缺乏逃避处罚的直接故意；无证据灭失不可挽回后果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不构成犯罪（移交纪检监察机关，给予党纪政务处分）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不承担刑事责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">单纯人情通风报信（基础档）具备查禁职责人员因私交透露风声，分文未取，嫌疑人潜逃后迅速归案，核心证据可替代还原\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">具备法定查禁职责；实施了报信行为；未受贿；未造成重大追诉灭失后果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪（普通情节，三年以下档次）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；具备争取缓刑或免刑空间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">致使重特大证据毁灭\u002F主犯长期脱逃明知系重大涉黑专案，故意泄露具体抓捕方案，致使涉黑骨干长期脱逃或原始财务证据彻底灭失\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">具备查禁职责；造成严重追诉不能；造成恶劣社会影响；符合“情节严重”加重档次\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪（加重情节，三年至十年档次）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">权钱交易型“内鬼保护伞”利用查禁职务便利泄密，并长期收受黑恶势力巨额贿赂，甚至参股分红、出具虚假证明予以庇护\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">渎职犯罪与经济贪腐交织，严重损害国家公信力与司法公正\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">受贿罪 与 包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪 或 帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪（择一重或数罪并罚）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数罪并罚，起刑点通常在十年以上有期徒刑乃至无期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、官方指导裁判尺度与卓安实战辩护还原\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 官方权威裁判尺度与法律依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》以及全国扫黑办、两高两部《关于在扫黑除恶专项斗争中分工负责、互相配合、互相制约严惩公职人员涉黑涉恶违法犯罪问题的通知》：办理公职人员涉黑涉恶犯罪案件，必须准确区分公职人员涉黑涉恶违法犯罪与一般违纪违规行为的界限；准确认定通风报信行为与犯罪分子逃避处罚之间的因果关联，既要深挖彻查“保护伞”，又要防止拔高认定与扩大化，坚决杜绝以政治评价代替法定犯罪构成，做到罚当其罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 裁判文书级真实案例还原：孙某帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在司法实践中，关于刑法第417条的抗辩必须建立在极其严谨的客观证据链之上。以司法机关审理生效的典型判例〔内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市中级人民法院（2019）内01刑终283号刑事裁定书〕为例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案情简述\u003C\u002Fstrong>：孙某原系呼和浩特市第一看守所二中队负责人。在明知羁押于其中队涉嫌寻衅滋事罪的犯罪嫌疑人张某1系涉恶重点监控对象的情况下，仍受托在张某1与其家属之间违规传递信件、口信，提供联络便利，并收受张某1家属两条中华香烟。一审法院判处其有期徒刑九个月十五天。孙某提出上诉，主张其无帮助逃避处罚的目的，且未造成脱逃后果，请求改判无罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护攻防推演\u003C\u002Fstrong>：控方紧扣孙某身为看守所中队长的特殊查禁监管职责，以及涉恶犯罪的严重危害性，坚持严厉追责。\u003Cstrong>成安律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>在指导类似职务犯罪辩护策略时指出：当客观行为已被电子数据与言词证据固定、行为犯定性难以彻底推翻时，\u003Cstrong>辩护重心应立即由定性抗辩转向定量阻断\u003C\u002Fstrong>——重点举证其行为未造成证据灭失、未影响专案审结，坚决阻断公诉机关将其升档为“情节严重”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>裁判结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>：呼和浩特市中级人民法院二审裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。该案清晰印证了当前审判机关的裁判尺度：即便构成帮助犯罪分子逃避处罚罪，只要辩护人能够精准剥离涉黑涉恶加重情节，量刑即可被严格限缩在一年以下的有期徒刑甚至拘役，从而避免面临数年以上重刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F5617e64c-052c-4c9d-9533-869aabfd000d.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、案件进入审查起诉阶段，辩护律师能做些什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案件移送至检察院审查起诉阶段后，辩护律师需针对核心证据与程序要件展开实质性攻坚：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 启动实质性穿透阅卷，核查微信聊天记录的真实语境\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">律师须逐页核对《电子数据提取笔录》与手机检验光盘，将涉案微信语音的提取时间与专班涉密线索流转时间轴进行严密对齐。重点审查赵某发送该条微信时，其工作职责是否涉及钱某线索的排查，是否存在其他渠道走漏风声的可能。若微信语境仅体现为民事纠纷的人情提示，律师应从“主观故意不明知”与“证据排他性不足”两方面向检察官提出出罪或不起诉法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 核查具体调派手续与分工，核准法定职责边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">律师需要调取当事人在专班的《借调公函》《专班人员工作职责分工表》等书证。若赵某仅从事外围保卫、信息排版、会议记录等行政后勤工作，并不直接参与任何案件的实体侦查与查禁，律师应依法向检察机关出具书面意见，论证其不符合刑法第417条特定查禁主体的构成要件，推动从犯罪指控中脱钩。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 及时提交《法律意见书》，阻断“情节严重”加重档次适用\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在检察机关拟定《起诉书》与《量刑建议书》之前，辩护团队须提交系统论证的《法律意见书》。重点论证：涉案老板销毁的账册可通过银行流水、税务纳税申报等客观数据反向复原，未造成国家追诉权的实质灭失；赵某分文未取，系初犯偶犯。从而全力说服检察院不作“情节严重”的升档认定，将量刑建议坚决锁定在三年以下法定刑基准内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、给当事人及家属的忠告：应对危机的三大原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员一旦卷入涉黑恶专案调查，面临的是职业声誉与人身自由的双重危机，家属必须以规范、合法的策略应对：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）事发征兆期：留存客观凭证，切忌擅自串供\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">一旦察觉专案组正在倒查通信记录，当事人切勿擅自删除微信记录、更换手机或找涉案人员订立攻守同盟。现代电子取证技术能够轻易穿透并完整恢复被删数据，擅自删改不仅会被直接作为认定“主观恶性深”的证据，更会被定性为“对抗组织审查”，彻底丧失坦白、自首及认罪认罚从宽的法定优惠条件。应如实封存工作交接记录与客观通信痕迹，及早寻求专业律师指导。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）案发后家属应对：保持克制清醒，切勿“病急乱投医”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">人被留置或羁押后，家属往往乱作一团，极易落入社会不法分子“花钱找关系捞人”的诈骗圈套。涉黑恶专案均实行封闭办案与异地监督，任何违规打探案情均会被严密记录并追究法律责任。家属应保持冷静，尽早委托具备深厚职务犯罪实战经验的专业刑事律师，通过合法阅卷、依法会见与正规程序沟通来维护当事人的合法权益。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）关于退赃退赔：厘清事实性质，切勿“病态认罪”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>厘清性质\u003C\u002Fstrong>：本案中当事人若确实未收受涉案老板分文财物，就不存在涉嫌受贿的违法所得。如果家属在慌乱中听信外界传言，主动筹措几十万元向办案机关“退赔求轻判”，等于变相自认受贿或自认是黑恶势力的经济庇护者，不仅起不到从宽效果，反而会坐实更加严重的贪腐指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>依法应对\u003C\u002Fstrong>：涉案老板销毁账本涉及的民事赔偿或追赃，与赵某个人在法律上无连带退赔义务。一切涉及款项的提交，必须严格在专业律师指导下核实性质与合法性，坚决杜绝因盲目退款引发次生法律危机。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉及扫黑除恶的司法风暴中，法律不仅是惩治犯罪的利剑，更是划定罪与非罪界限的精准天平。公职人员在工作与私交交织的复杂场域中，或许因一时的人情人性弱点越过了纪律红线，但违纪违规绝不能在没有证据支撑的情况下被任意拔高为刑事犯罪。事实不容曲解，法条严禁类推。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师事务所深耕刑事业务十多年，在首席律师成安博士带领下，汇聚了一大批具备前监委、检察、法院及公安背景的专业人才。我们始终坚守“卓然而成，报君以安”的立所初心，致力于在最艰难的职务与涉黑恶案件攻防中抽丝剥茧、恪守正义。面对复杂的刑事风暴，如需深入了解职务犯罪与涉黑恶类案的裁判规则与应对路径，可参阅卓安律师事务所官网（zhuoanlaw.com）。专业的刑事辩护，永远是身陷风暴者通往司法公正的最坚实桥梁。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 23:33:54",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"没拿钱算保护伞吗？提醒涉恶老板潜逃，专班干部如何阻断重罪？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对政法专班借调干部“未收分文仅凭私交微信提醒，致涉案人毁证潜逃”的定罪争议，卓安律师事务所基于职务犯罪实务指出：刑法第417条不以牟利为构成要件，泄露初核线索极易被认定为通风报信。辩护的核心攻防焦点在于：一是穿透审查借调岗位的具体查禁职责权限；二是坚决切断与涉黑组织的利益关联，阻断“涉黑保护伞”及“情节严重","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F531",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-17T23:33:54+08:00","2026-09-17T18:39:25+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F5b9c2dc4-1403-4c77-80ab-998438b12a24.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]