[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-535":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},535,"2026-09-17 18:39:25","招商大开绿灯被倒查涉黑保护伞？当年不知情该如何阻断定性？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F500a4769-3bfd-4691-b5be-ec12c924a752.png","\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>针对地方招商“过度扶持”被升格倒查为黑恶“保护伞”的职务风险，卓安刑事团队指出：包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪必须以“明知其涉黑”为法定主观要件。公职人员基于招商考核实施的土地特批与协调审批，属行政履职瑕疵，不能因企业事后涉黑而客观归罪。面对专案倒查，切忌恐慌乱认，应尽早由专业律师介入，调取集体决策案卷，依法阻断向涉黑重罪的拔高定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、当年招商引资特批手续，为何多年后被专案组盯上？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">地方招商引资中的特批土地、缓缴规费等行政扶持，在扫黑除恶常态化倒查机制下，正面临被专案组从“行政瑕疵”拔高追责为黑恶“保护伞”的严峻风险。某经开区原常务副主任，数年前为完成重大园区招商任务，按地方扶持办法协调特批了用地指标、缓缴配套规费，并就环保核查与职能部门沟通。数年后，该涉案企业负责人在异地涉黑案中落网并被定性为“矿霸”。省纪检监察专案组调取历史卷宗后，以客观上的审批“开绿灯”事实，逆向推定公职人员为黑恶势力提供非法庇护，拟以\u003Cstrong>包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>立案调查。当事人深感恐惧：当年对涉黑毫不知情，纯粹为发展经济履职，何以被定为涉黑“保护伞”？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、遇到“过度扶持被升格倒查为涉黑保护伞”，大家最困惑的几个现实问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 当年完全不知道企业涉黑，仅凭开绿灯审批和打招呼，专案组就能定“保护伞”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：绝对不能。刑法第二百九十四条第四款规定的包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪，属于法定故意犯罪，以行为人“主观明知”为绝对必备要件。卓安律师事务所首席律师成安律师在指导公职人员职务犯罪与涉黑交叉案件时明确指出，刑法严禁以事后查明的黑恶危害结果，主观臆断并逆向推定公职人员当年的主观故意。招商引资中的政策倾斜，动机在于完成地方考核指标。若在案证据既无法证明其明知该组织系黑社会性质组织，又无证据证实其明知该企业从事违法犯罪活动，便在法定层面上双重阻断了该罪的主观故意要件，绝不能因企业事后涉案而客观归罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 招商考核中推行的“会议纪要特批”、“容缺办理”，在法律上属于履职瑕疵还是刑事犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：核心取决于决策程序与履职动机。开发区领导班子为推进重大产业落地，依程序召开党政联席会形成会议纪要，推行容缺受理、先建后验、阶段性缓缴土地出让金等举措，本质属于地方政府探索经济发展的行政履职行为。即便在当前的严格依法行政标准下审视存在程序瑕疵或行政越权，但只要属于依章程流转的集体决策且公职人员个人无贪腐谋私，其属性属于行政过错乃至政策性容错免责范畴，与针对黑恶势力进行徇私枉法庇护的犯罪行为存在本质区别。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 如果确实存在违规审批甚至越权打招呼，案件在司法定性上有哪些分流走向？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：在实务中主要存在三种法定分流走向：第一，\u003Cstrong>不构成犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，若遵循集体决策且为公共利益推进项目，未发生实质法益侵害，应通过党纪政务处分、容错纠错机制妥善化解；第二，\u003Cstrong>构成滥用职权罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，若违规越权造成国家财产遭受重大损失，且行为人主观存在滥用职权故意，可能被追究渎职责任，但其法定刑及量刑幅度远轻于涉黑罪名；第三，\u003Cstrong>构成包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，唯有证实行为人明知企业属于从事违法犯罪活动的组织，仍利用职权为其阻挠执法、包庇逃避查禁，方能成立。辩护的关键正在于坚决切断由“行政过错\u002F职务渎职”向“涉黑保护伞”的违规拔高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 专案组指控“公职人员为黑恶势力形成非法控制提供便利”，法庭如何认定因果关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：刑法要求职务行为与黑恶犯罪危害后果之间必须具备法律上的直接因果关系。成安律师在构建涉黑衍生职务犯罪辩护模型时提出：公职人员给予企业的税费阶段性缓缴、土地要素保障等扶持，指向的是企业的合法生产形态与实体经济投资；而黑恶势力后续实施的非法采矿、暴力讨债、强迫交易等有组织犯罪，与前期的行政审批不具备刑法上的直接引起与被引起关系。公诉机关不能将民营企业事后异化滋生的黑灰产违法，生搬硬套归咎于多年前招商部门的行政扶持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>5. 案件处于纪检监察留置调查阶段，家属在外面到底能做些什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师解答：切忌病急乱投医，切勿轻信所谓“找关系捞人”的司法掮客，严禁私下找企业人员或经办下属串供。家属应当迅速在专业刑事律师的协助下，全面搜集并固定当年的客观公文底稿：包括当年的全区招商考核方案、考核责任状、招商引资协调会议纪要、班子成员审批会签单、发改与规划部门的联合审查文件等书证。用白纸黑字的法定公文将涉案行为锁定在“政府集体履职行为”的轨道内，为后续审查起诉阶段的定性阻断辩护奠定证据根基。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、法院判定“涉黑保护伞”的真实审查标准是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）定性：招商“行政越权”绝不等同于涉黑“包庇纵容”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">区分招商扶持瑕疵与涉黑保护伞的司法红线，集中在主观认知、行为属性与对价基础三个核心维度：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>主观认知层面\u003C\u002Fstrong>：涉黑“保护伞”必须以明知被包庇对象是从事违法犯罪活动的涉黑组织为前提；招商引资审批面对的是具备合法工商登记的民营企业主体，公职人员不具备刑事侦查手段，对企业私下的涉黑性质不具备法定的预见可能性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>行为属性层面\u003C\u002Fstrong>：包庇纵容行为表现为压案不查、通风报信、帮助逃匿等妨害司法与监管活动的具体违法行为；而招商特批属于经济管理职能的行使，行为本身并未干预刑事司法或包庇具体犯罪行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>利益关联层面\u003C\u002Fstrong>：黑恶保护伞在司法实践中往往伴随着深度的权钱交易、暗股分红或职务寻租；公职人员若仅为完成地方考核指标而违规协调，无任何个人非法获利，缺乏构成受贿与涉黑包庇的对价基础。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）招商引资涉企履职行为与刑事定性对比矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为类型\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心行为特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">主观心态与目的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法律适用与定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">量刑与处理走向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">政策性行政瑕疵\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">班子会签、会议纪要明确的容缺审批、缓缴规费\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">完成地方GDP与招商考核指标，无谋私目的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不构成犯罪，属行政违规或容错纠错范畴\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">诫勉谈话、政务处分或免予处理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">职务渎职行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">违规越权特批土地指标、绕过环保红线打招呼\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">盲目追求政绩或徇私情，明知违规仍故意为之\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉嫌滥用职权罪（刑法第397条）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；情节特别严重的，处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">黑恶“保护伞”行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">明知企业涉黑，利用职权阻挠执法、通风报信、包庇犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">明知对方从事涉黑犯罪，故意放纵并助其逃避查处\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪（刑法第294条第4款）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处五年以下有期徒刑；情节严重处五年以上有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、司法机关是如何认定“主观明知与履职过失”界限的？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 官方指导性裁判观点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高人民法院人民法院案例库入库案例（入库编号：2023-04-1-420-003，天津市第三中级人民法院（2022）津03刑初25号刑事判决）裁判要旨明确：“没有证据证实行为人主观上认识到被包庇、纵容对象系从事违法犯罪活动组织的，不构成包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪。”《人民日报》法治评论亦多次强调，扫黑除恶必须坚持法治思维与证据裁判原则，严格区分违规履职与涉黑涉恶犯罪界限，坚决防止将行政审批瑕疵客观归罪、人为拔高为黑恶“保护伞”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 司法裁判文书深度实战复盘：邢某包庇涉黑指控被阻断案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在天津市第三中级人民法院审理的（2022）津03刑初25号案件中，公诉机关指控：被告人邢某身为国家工作人员，利用职务便利出面过问相关涉案人员冲突案件，致使多名涉案人员逃避追究，指控其构成包庇黑社会性质组织罪及徇私枉法罪。控方逻辑认为，涉案团伙后续已被司法机关确认为黑社会性质组织，邢某出面协调打招呼客观上为涉黑组织逃避打击提供了庇护，应当认定为涉黑“保护伞”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">成安律师专案团队在介入涉嫌包庇涉黑组织的重大倒查案时，确立了“以法定明知阻断黑恶拔高、以集体决策剥离个人责任”的核心辩护策略，其对抗逻辑与该案裁判说理高度契合：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，穿透审查主观明知的证据排他性\u003C\u002Fstrong>。辩方严密比对全案讯问笔录与证人证言，指出控方仅能证实行为人出面协调行政或治安纠纷，但在案证据完全无法证明行为人在协调时认识到对方属于从事违法犯罪活动的黑社会性质组织，主观明知要件缺失。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，客观行为与涉黑犯罪链条严格阻断\u003C\u002Fstrong>。核查行为人出面协调的具体事件，证实相关纠纷具有偶发性与民商事属性，行为人并无授意下属或职能部门压案不查、帮助黑恶势力逃匿、阻挠司法查禁的包庇故意。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，依法提交专业抗辩意见\u003C\u002Fstrong>。辩护方紧扣刑法主客观相一致原则，向法庭系统论证：绝不能将普通执法、司法履职中的越权协调瑕疵，在事后简单以结果倒推上升为包庇涉黑重罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>裁判文书生效结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>：天津市第三中级人民法院经审理完全采纳了该项抗辩逻辑，在裁判文书中明确认定：控方在案证据不足以证实邢某主观上认识到被包庇对象系从事违法犯罪活动的组织，公诉机关指控其犯包庇黑社会性质组织罪的定性不当，依法不予支持，最终宣告包庇黑社会性质组织罪不成立，仅按徇私枉法罪定罪量刑。该案成为司法实践中成功阻断涉黑“保护伞”拔高定性的标杆裁判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Fa9109c84-6453-48e2-a76e-4cefcea48920.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、案件进入审查起诉阶段，辩护律师能做些什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 全面、实质性的“四步阅卷”，排查有无“以结果倒推明知”的诱导性供述\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案件由监察机关移送检察机关审查起诉后，律师必须逐页比对讯问笔录与同步录音录像。重点审查当事人在留置期间，笔录中关于“是否知晓企业涉黑、是否放任不管”等关键表述，排查调查人员是否存在“你作为分管领导，他们搞这么大你怎么可能不知道”等推断诱导。对以诱导、逼供方式获取的言词证据，依法向检察院提交《排除非法证据申请书》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 调取核心客观证据，将个人行为还原为组织决策与招商考核机制\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">律师应向检察机关提交《调取证据材料申请书》，全面补充调取项目引进当年的宏观政策文件、经开区招商引资考核责任状、管委会常务会议纪要及多部门会签审批表等书证，确凿证实当年的特批与协调系严格执行招商考核机制的集体决策，彻底剥离公职人员个人与涉黑主体的私下利益关联。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 及时提交书面《法律意见书》，从源头阻断重罪指控\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在检察官形成起诉决定前，律师应主动预约当面沟通，提交《关于建议对包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪不予指控的法律意见书》。从“主观缺乏涉黑明知、客观缺乏包庇行为、因果关系法定阻断”三方面展开闭环论证，力促检察机关在制作《起诉书》时彻底剔除涉黑保护伞罪名，避免重罪指控进入法院审判程序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、给公职人员及家属的忠告：应对危机的三大原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）事发征兆期：全面固定履职公文底稿，切忌私下串供\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">一旦察觉专案组正在倒查多年前的招商引资项目，公职人员切勿心存侥幸去删改电子通讯记录或私下找企业人员、经办下属“对口径”。在现代电子数据恢复技术下，此类举动极易被认定为对抗组织审查，丧失法定的从宽处理空间。此时应依法依规梳理并备份当年公文批示、会议纪要原件或发文字号，用客观公文流转证明行为的公务履职属性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）留置调查期：客观还原决策背景，绝不因施压乱认“主观明知”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在面对留置调查的高压心理审讯时，公职人员必须实事求是。对于自己为完成招商引资考核指标而推行的政策变通或程序瑕疵，可如实陈述；但对于“是否明知其涉黑”、“是否利用职权为其违法兜底”等涉及重罪性质的致命要件，绝不能为了迎合审查或因恐慌而顺从办案人员的推断盲目认下，坚决拒绝签署不符合客观事实的笔录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）涉案财产处置：严格厘清合法财产边界，切忌盲目“代企退赃”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉案企业缓缴、欠缴的土地出让金或行政配套费，在法律性质上属于企业法人的行政债务或涉案行政追缴标的，其责任主体是企业法人而非公职人员个人。退赃的前提是公职人员个人存在职务犯罪的违法所得。在事实与定性未查清前，家属若因恐慌筹款代企业补缴税费并冠以“退赃”之名，极易在法庭上被公诉方视作公职人员与涉黑企业存在深层个人利益捆绑的反向佐证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在扫黑除恶常态化与打伞破网的纵深推进中，刑罚必须坚守罪责自负与主客观相一致的现代法治底线。当年招商引资大潮中的“重发展轻合规”、“容缺审批”，是特定历史时期的行政抉择与制度瑕疵，绝不能在多年后因民营企业主涉黑犯罪，就被办案机关事后倒推、机械拔高为“涉黑保护伞”。\u003Cbr>卓安律师事务所深耕刑事业务十多年，在首席律师成安律师带领下，办理过数百起重大疑难复杂的职务犯罪与涉黑涉恶案件。我们深知，公职人员及其家庭面对涉黑“保护伞”指控时的惊涛骇浪。但事实可以澄清，法律可以争辩。精准剥离行政过错与涉黑包庇，用客观证据阻断不当升格，正是专业刑事辩护捍卫公平正义的生命线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 23:39:35",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"招商大开绿灯被倒查涉黑保护伞？当年不知情该如何阻断定性？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对地方招商“过度扶持”被升格倒查为黑恶“保护伞”的职务风险，卓安刑事团队指出：包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪必须以“明知其涉黑”为法定主观要件。公职人员基于招商考核实施的土地特批与协调审批，属行政履职瑕疵，不能因企业事后涉黑而客观归罪。面对专案倒查，切忌恐慌乱认，应尽早由专业律师介入，调取集体决策案卷，依法阻断","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F535",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-17T23:39:35+08:00","2026-09-17T18:39:25+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F500a4769-3bfd-4691-b5be-ec12c924a752.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]