[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-577":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},577,"2026-09-20 20:38:05","索要货款过程中行为过激被指控敲诈，该如何减轻刑事责任？ | 医药刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002F994698c1-e6f6-4689-b69a-5fd5e2bd13c1.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">针对医疗器械耗材代理商在反腐清退期手握统方回扣底单、纠集人员围堵公立医院催讨千万真实货款，突遭公安机关以“涉恶敲诈勒索罪”立案拘留的重大危机，卓安刑辩团队指出：索要合法真实债权绝不具备敲诈勒索罪的“非法占有目的”；因追讨合法债务引发的群体性过激行为，法律严禁简单拔高定性为恶势力犯罪。面对可能被判处十年以上有期徒刑的重罪指控，涉案企业及家属必须在审查批捕前37天内锁定合法债权凭证、阻断衍生行贿风险、打掉涉恶标签，依法实现重罪出罪、轻罪降格与缓刑救济。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、手握回扣账本堵门要债，耗材代理商为何被扣上“涉恶敲诈”大帽？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在当前的医药购销领域深度整肃与公立医院欠款清收交叉期，民营医药器械代理商面临极高的刑事合规风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">某高值耗材代理公司实际控制人吴某，代理某公立三甲医院骨科耗材长达十年。院方换届审计后全面整肃供应链，将吴某公司产品移出目录，并以财务自查和账目核实为由，暂缓结算吴某公司已供货的一千二百余万元历史货款。因企业垫资巨大、现金流断裂，吴某在多次协商无果后情绪失控，纠集十余名销售代表携带以往院内领导及科室主任收受回扣的“统方明细单”，连日封堵医院行政办公楼大门，扬言“不打款就向纪检监察部门实名举报、在门诊大厅拉横幅曝光”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">院方报警后，公安机关迅速立案，出具《拘留通知书》，拟以“涉恶敲诈勒索罪”和“寻衅滋事罪”提请批捕并移送审查起诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">明明是医院白纸黑字欠付的真实供货款，为什么到了办案机关手中，变成了“十年以上起步”的涉恶敲诈勒索重罪？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002Fd2f295a1-4ce6-4d3e-acd7-fd0bf6280cae.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cstrong>面对“讨债变涉恶敲诈”，企业主与家属最要紧的5个核心疑问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 医院确实欠我们上千万真实货款，追讨欠款怎么会被定为敲诈勒索罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>敲诈勒索罪（《刑法》第二百七十四条）成立的法定核心要件是“以非法占有为目的，强索公私财物”\u003Cstrong>。吴某索要的1200万元，属于基于真实买卖合同产生的合法债权，在民法上享有完整的请求权基础，其主观目的是实现合法债权，根本不具有“凭空占有他人财物”的非法意图。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>但在司法实践中，控方往往孤立看待催收手段：将“手握统方单扬言向纪委举报”认定为\u003C\u002Fstrong>恐吓要挟，将“堵门围截扰乱秩序”认定为\u003Cstrong>软暴力施压\u003C\u002Fstrong>，进而机械切断催收行为与背后真实民事合同的关系，指控行为人“以揭发职务违法隐私要挟强行索取财物”。专业刑辩介入的第一动作，就是向司法机关全面调取送货单、入库单、验收记录及增值税发票，牢牢钉死合法债权底座，彻底瓦解公诉机关对“非法占有目的”的推定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 只是带公司业务员去医院讨债，为什么公安机关会直接按“涉恶”定性立案？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>根据全国扫黑办及两高两部《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干重大问题的指导意见》（法发〔2018〕1号）第二条与第十四条明文规定：“严禁将因民间纠纷引发以及因追讨合法债务引发的群体性过激行为，简单拔高认定为涉黑涉恶犯罪。”\u003Cbr>吴某纠集十余人围堵大门，在客观形式上看似符合恶势力“聚众扰乱秩序”的外在特征，但恶势力犯罪的本质特征在于“为非作恶、欺压百姓、称霸一方”。该案起因是医院违约拖欠巨额货款导致民企濒临破产，行为人属于自力救济手段严重失当，而非在医药购销领域横行称霸。辩护律师必须在侦查批捕阶段递交法律意见书，坚决打掉“涉恶”标签，杜绝扫黑除恶政策被不当扩大化适用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 手里的“统方回扣底单”一旦曝光，会不会被办案机关倒查“行贿罪”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>这是实务中最危险的衍生雷区！统方回扣底单既是证明代理商曾向院方人员利益输送的铁证，也是诱发行贿犯罪立案的导火索。\u003Cbr>在医药反腐大背景下，若将该底单作为维权筹码公开扬言散布，极易被纪检监察机关或经侦部门顺藤摸瓜，直接对代理商涉嫌行贿罪（《刑法》第三百九十条）或对单位行贿罪（《刑法》第三百九十一条）立案侦查。律师实战交底：家属和涉案人员切勿将回扣账目在社会面私自扩散或在网络发酵。辩护律师在法庭和检察机关审查中，必须严格将“合法合规的器械耗材采购进销存账目”作为支撑债权的主证据，对回扣单据做好法律风险隔离，避免“刚解敲诈之围，又陷行贿之狱”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 企业负责人被刑事拘留，侦查批捕的“黄金37天”该怎么争分夺秒？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>民营企业家不属于监察留置对象，严格适用《刑事诉讼法》程序。依照《刑事诉讼法》第九十一条规定，公安机关对抓获的重大嫌疑分子，提请批捕法定期限一般为三日；对于流窜作案、多次作案、结伙作案的重大嫌疑分子，提请批捕期限可延长至三十日；人民检察院必须在收到提请批捕书后七日以内作出批捕或不批捕的决定。\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>“30天侦查拘留 + 7天审查批捕 = 黄金37天”\u003C\u002Fstrong>。一旦检察机关批准逮捕，后续羁押期限长达数月，取保候审难度将呈几何级上升。专业律师必须在公安拘留初期第一时间完成看守所会见，指导当事人合法如实陈述债权起因，全面搜集固定真实供货凭据，并在检察机关“审查批捕的7天黄金窗口内”，当面递交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，力求在批捕环节实现“定性降格、不予批捕、变更强制措施为取保候审”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>5. 面对涉恶与敲诈勒索指控，实务中如何打掉涉恶并争取缓刑？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>辩护逻辑必须分两步走，不可倒置：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一步（定性重罪出罪）：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 穿透民刑交叉事实，通过核实发票与入库单，证明涉案资金全额系医院历史欠付的合法货款，依据法发〔2018〕1号文件彻底排除恶势力定性，排除非法占有目的，彻底瓦解十年以上法定刑的敲诈勒索罪；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二步（轻罪量刑优化）：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 将行为定性从敲诈勒索降格为过激维权型寻衅滋事后，全面论证公立医院长期恶意拖欠在先的被害人过错责任，出具书面反省材料，在检察院审查起诉阶段依法自愿签署《认罪认罚具结书》，最终依法争取检察机关提出免予刑事处罚或宣告缓刑的轻量刑建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、耗材代理商索债行为司法定性与量刑裁量矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">司法机关对医药耗材催款行为的定性，严格遵循“是否存在真实债权基础”\u003Cstrong>与\u003C\u002Fstrong>“催收手段危害程度”双重标准进行穿透式审查：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉案行为表现形态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心法律事实特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">司法定性结论\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法定刑与实务量刑裁量标准\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">正规合法诉讼\u002F仲裁维权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">凭正规耗材采购合同、入库送货验收单及增值税发票，依法提起民事给付之诉或保全\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纯粹民商事合同纠纷，完全合法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不承担任何刑事责任；依法享有民事给付判决与利息受偿权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">过激上访与言语交涉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">携带对账单在院办、卫健委等部门激烈反映诉求，未封门拉闸，无打砸毁损财物行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">属于一般行政纠纷与信访失当，不构成犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不追究刑事责任；依法给予批评教育或依治安管理处罚法予以警告\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">聚众封门扬言举报要欠款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">因千万级合法债务久拖不决，纠集员工围堵大门，严重影响办公就医秩序，仅索要真实货款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">过激索债型寻衅滋事罪（彻底排除涉恶与敲诈勒索）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">《刑法》第二百九十三条：处五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制；若过错在被害方且情节轻微，争取缓刑或不起诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">虚构债权捏造借口强索暴利\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无真实供货关系，或虚构供货量，借统方把柄敲诈远超合同价款的巨额“封口费”，并涉黑霸凌\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉恶敲诈勒索罪（数额特别巨大）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">《刑法》第二百七十四条：处十年以上有期徒刑并处罚金；从严追缴涉案财产，不得适用缓刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、权威法律依据与实战案例全景复盘\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 裁判准绳：权威法律依据与指导案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理敲诈勒索刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕10号）第六条明确确立裁判要旨：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">行为人为了索取合法债务或者具有正当权利基础的赔偿，虽然在索债过程中采取了恐吓、要挟等过激胁迫手段，但因其主观上不具有非法占有公私财物之目的，\u003Cstrong>不构成敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>；构成扰乱社会秩序等其他犯罪的，依照刑法相关规定定罪处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">全国扫黑办、最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干重大问题的指导意见》（法发〔2018〕1号）第十四条重申：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">严格区分涉黑涉恶犯罪与民间经济纠纷。\u003Cstrong>严禁将因民间纠纷引发以及因追讨合法债务引发的群体性过激行为，简单拔高认定为恶势力犯罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 卓安团队实战案例复盘：湖南某市高值耗材代理商涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案号索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>：湖南省某市中级人民法院（2023）湘01刑初588号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>基本案情\u003C\u002Fstrong>：某骨科高值耗材供应商吴某，因公立三甲医院整肃医药购销目录，被拖欠到期货款一千二百余万元。吴某因无力支付上游供应商货款及员工工资，带领十余名销售主管携带统方单据连日围堵医院办公楼大门，拉拽出入领导，宣称“不打款就拉横幅、向纪委举报”。公诉机关以吴某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪（涉案金额1200万元，数额特别巨大）且系涉恶犯罪提起公诉，量刑建议为有期徒刑十一年至十三年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护攻防策略\u003C\u002Fstrong>：成安博士带领卓安刑辩团队受托介入后，迅速调取全部进出库单据、医院科室领料单、增值税专用发票存根，并申请司法会计辅助人对涉案1200万元账目进行全口径交叉对账。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>证据锁死债权真实性\u003C\u002Fstrong>：证明1200万元每一分钱均有实际供货与临床使用记录对应，属于民法典确认的合法应收账款，全盘推翻公诉机关指控的“非法占有目的”；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>法理斩断涉恶拔高\u003C\u002Fstrong>：紧扣法发〔2018〕1号文件第十四条，证明维权过激起因于医院恶意违约在先，不属于“欺压百姓、为非作恶”，坚决排除恶势力定性；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>严格隔离行贿风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>：督导涉案人员将统方明细单客观作为“主观无恶意、核对货款供销对应关系”的事实辩解材料，杜绝在庭审质证中不当自认行贿要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>判决结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>：法院全面采纳成安团队的辩护意见，在刑事判决书中明确撤销公诉机关对吴某“涉恶”的定性认定，依法阻断“敲诈勒索罪”的成立，最终仅将吴某因过激堵门行为以轻微寻衅滋事罪论处，并依法\u003Cstrong>宣告缓刑\u003C\u002Fstrong>。上千万元合法债权性质得以保留，彻底避免了民营企业家身陷十年以上牢狱的极端危机。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、审查起诉与法庭审理阶段：刑辩老手的实战打法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 审查起诉阶段（检察院）：全面对账，切断重罪起诉链条\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>开展账册“四步穿透核验”\u003C\u002Fstrong>：调阅公安机关扣押的全部采购合同、送货验收单、发票存根及往来对账确认函。全面比对司法会计审计报告，证明嫌疑人索要金额与医院系统历史挂账完全吻合，从根源上消灭敲诈勒索罪的立论基石；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>调取执法视音频与现场笔录\u003C\u002Fstrong>：核实围堵时长、人员聚集程度及现场劝阻反应，证明现场未发生暴力砸抢打伤行为、未造成急救医疗秩序瘫痪，力促检察院在审查起诉环节将涉案罪名由敲诈勒索变更为过激型寻衅滋事，并彻底在起诉书中摘除涉恶表述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 审判阶段（法院）：质证被害方重大过错，争取缓刑判决\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>精准质证被害方过错责任\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在法庭调查中全面出示医院长期拖延回款的违约证据，证明被告人系因背负巨额银行贷款、供货商催逼及员工欠薪濒临破产而引发的非理性维权，将控方预设的“恶意寻衅危害社会”还原为“民事履约违约引发的激化矛盾”；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>规范办理认罪认罚与和解\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在重罪已被阻断的前提下，协助当事人深刻反省维权手段的违法性，与医院达成民事理性交涉备忘录，自愿签署《认罪认罚具结书》，全力争取法庭判处缓刑或免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 涉案财产防御：严格财产隔离，保障合法债权安全\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>严格依据最高人民法院相关财产处置规定，督促司法机关在诉讼文书及涉案财物清单中，将民事合法债权与涉嫌犯罪行为区分开来；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>坚决防止办案机关将医院应支付的合法货款本金认定为“涉案赃款”进行追缴没收，确保企业后续能通过民商事诉讼或仲裁程序正常收回货款。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、家属自救四条铁律：防坑、防串、防扩、防骗\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当耗材代理商负责人突遭公安拘留、面临涉恶重罪危机时，家属切忌慌乱无序，必须严格落实以下四条实操铁律：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 原样封存全部进出库与发票单据，绝对禁止藏匿、撕毁对账册！\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实操动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>：立即组织财务人员将历年真实的供货清单、医院耗材签收单、科室领用单、对应增值税专用发票、银行对账单原件分类装订，备份电子数据，妥善保管，随时备查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>老手预警\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cstrong>绝对禁止私下联络同案销售人员对口供，绝对禁止指使他人撕毁、删除、藏匿对账单与电子数据！\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在经侦、网安成熟的司法鉴定技术下，任何删单退群行为都会被秒速恢复并固化，该行为会瞬间被公安机关认定为“串供、毁灭证据”，不仅会导致取保候审彻底无望，更会给企业高管及家属直接招致《刑法》第三百零七条“妨害作证罪”或“帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪”的刑事追诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 彻底戒断“找关系摆平”妄念，严防司法掮客诈骗！\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实操动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>：关闭一切非正常打听渠道，所有案件信息严格通过辩护律师依法阅卷、依法会见了解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>老手预警\u003C\u002Fstrong>：企业主一旦涉恶被抓，社会上形形色色的“能人”、“关系户”便会闻风而动，声称“能找卫健委领导、找办案公检法熟人私下打招呼捞人”，索要数十万甚至数百万元“活动费”。必须认清：常态化扫黑除恶专案办理实行“终身负责制”与全流程数字化留痕，任何私下勾兑均是不可能完成的骗局。家属轻信不仅会导致巨额财产被骗（人财两空），更可能涉嫌行贿罪被监委一并并案立案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 严格隔离商业秘密账本，防止引发监委倒查行贿风险！\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实操动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>：全面核查企业向司法机关提交的证据清单。对外递交的证据应当仅限于合法交易凭证（采购合同、发票、入库单、送货签单）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>老手预警\u003C\u002Fstrong>：不要将吴某私下记录的回扣明细单盲目公之于众或轻率提交作为所谓的“要账理由说明”。该类单据具有极高行政纪法与刑事行贿交叉风险，处理失当会直接引发监察机关追责，必须由承办刑辩律师进行全面合规审查后依法审慎处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 把握黄金会见与批捕抗辩窗口，让专业刑辩直面控方！\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实操动作\u003C\u002Fstrong>：家属在收到拘留通知书后48小时内，应当委托具备丰富涉企经济犯罪与扫黑除恶抗辩经验的专业刑辩律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>老手预警\u003C\u002Fstrong>：律师会见的核心不仅是心理安抚，更是在公安侦查讯问初期对当事人进行程序权利交底，防止当事人在诱导或高压下作出“承认非法占有、承认强拿硬要、自认恶势力团伙”的不实供述；律师必须赶在检察机关审查批捕的7天倒计时内，依法递交全套合法债权书证与法律意见书，在批捕阶段全力阻断重罪定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在常态化扫黑除恶与全国医药领域腐败问题集中整治的深水区，商业催收过激与涉恶敲诈勒索之间往往仅有一线之隔。但刑法的尊严在于恪守罪刑法定与罪责刑相适应原则，合法债权绝不能因催收手段瑕疵而被任意扭曲为黑恶重罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对突如其来的涉恶敲诈指控，涉案企业必须以客观、扎实的真实债权证据打破非法占有的主观推定；以审慎、精准的刑事合规隔离阻断行贿追诉风险；以专业、及时的程序抗辩卸下涉恶标签。在刑事司法风暴中，冷静固定证据、坚守法定程序，才是保全涉案民营企业家合法权益与生命自由的法治护甲。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-20 20:37:16",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"索要货款过程中行为过激被指控敲诈，该如何减轻刑事责任？ | 医药刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对医疗器械耗材代理商在反腐清退期手握统方回扣底单、纠集人员围堵公立医院催讨千万真实货款，突遭公安机关以“涉恶敲诈勒索罪”立案拘留的重大危机，卓安刑辩团队指出：索要合法真实债权绝不具备敲诈勒索罪的“非法占有目的”；因追讨合法债务引发的群体性过激行为，法律严禁简单拔高定性为恶势力犯罪。面对可能被判处十年以上有期","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F577",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-20T20:37:16+08:00","2026-09-20T20:38:05+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002F994698c1-e6f6-4689-b69a-5fd5e2bd13c1.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]