[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-579":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},579,"2026-09-20 20:38:05","派人蹲守“老赖”别墅追欠款却被指控涉黑涉恶，如何自证清白？ | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002Fc5909b06-72fa-4272-89af-b8962243a28d.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">私募股权投资因对赌失败遭遇标的企业恶意违约与资产掏空，资方在采取“贴身跟随、静坐滞留”等自力救济手段催款时，极易触碰“软暴力”红线而被办案机关以“涉恶寻衅滋事罪”刑事立案。化解此类涉企涉刑危机的核心在于：牢牢锚定民商事合法债权与被害方违约过错，阻断“无事生非”的流氓动机认定；严格依据法定标准论证催收行为缺乏层级性、非法控制性与社会危害扩散性，依法剥离“黑恶势力”标签；把握刑事拘留至审查批捕的“黄金37天”，规范申请限额冻结以保全合法基金资产，通过主观罪过降格与有效和解争取不起诉、免予刑事处罚或缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、两亿对赌暴雷贴身逼债，资方高管为何突遭“涉恶拘留”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在股权投资与私募催收实务中，因民商事债务自力救济失范而诱发刑事重罪的案例屡见不鲜。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">某知名私募股权投资基金管理合伙人赵某，代表基金向某高新科技企业注资两亿元人民币并签署严格的业绩对赌协议。后标的企业核心业务严重爆雷，企业创始人私下以低价向关联方恶意转移核心专利与经营性资产，触发合同约定的全额回购条款。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">由于民商事诉讼立案与财产保全存在法定周期，赵某担心核心资产彻底被掏空，情急之下委托第三方安保公司派员对创始人实施“贴身跟随”：在其别墅大门外搭设折叠床24小时蹲守，连续多日滞留于其办公室内施压要求签署抵债协议。创始人随即以“遭遇黑恶势力滋扰”向公安机关报案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公安机关受案后，以涉嫌“软暴力寻衅滋事罪”对赵某及多名安保人员刑事拘留，且在侦查初查阶段倾向认定为“涉恶势力犯罪”。原本手握两亿元合法债权的投资人，转眼沦为身陷囹圄的刑事犯罪嫌疑人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对此类突发刑案，当事人及家属切不可按民事思维处理。必须先搞清司法机关的定性逻辑，才能展开精准防御。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、面对“软暴力涉恶寻衅”指控，投资人最焦虑的4大实务盲区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 对方恶意违约、掏空资产在先，我们索要合法欠款怎么就成了“寻衅滋事罪”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>核心原因在于：\u003Cstrong>自力救济的手段越过了法律保护公民人身自由与正常生活秩序的刑法红线。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">我国《刑法》第二百九十三条规定的寻衅滋事罪，打击的不仅是无端挑衅的流氓行为，也涵盖严重扰乱正常社会生活秩序的情形。最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕12号）明确规定：\u003Cstrong>为索取合法债务，采取持续贴身跟随、侵入私人住宅滋扰、长时间在办公场所静坐滞留等软暴力手段，严重影响他人正常工作、生活秩序的，依然可以依照刑法第二百九十三条定罪处罚。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">赵某享有真实的民商事债权，主观上并非无事生非侵占他人财物。然而，一旦采取连续蹲守、限制他人行动自由的强制手段，在刑法客观层面即构成了对他人人身权利与社会生活秩序的侵害。辩护的首要切入点，不是否认现场行为，而是向办案机关全面提交投资合同、验资流水与标的企业恶意转移资产的审计报告，\u003Cstrong>死死锁定“事出有因、因民事纠纷激化而起”的客观事实，彻底瓦解起诉意见书中关于“借故生非、逞强耍横”的流氓动机认定。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 安保人员没有动手打人、没有毁坏财物，为什么公安机关会认定为“涉恶势力”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>这是办案机关在司法实务中常见的“涉恶扩大化推定”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在部分地区的侦查惯性中，只要看到“资方出资、雇佣多人、统一着装、分工明确、多次贴身围堵”，便倾向于机械套用“有组织犯罪”模型，拔高指控为恶势力甚至恶势力犯罪集团。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">但《反有组织犯罪法》及两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》明确规定，恶势力的法定构成必须同时具备“为非作恶、欺压百姓”的本质特征，且必须在特定区域或行业内形成非法控制或造成恶劣社会公害。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>对象高度特定\u003C\u002Fstrong>：资方雇佣人员的目的仅为挽回特定两亿元投资款，侵害对象仅针对违约实控人，从未向社会不特定公众扩散风险；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>缺乏组织性与反社会性\u003C\u002Fstrong>：涉案安保人员系按月领取报酬的普通劳务派遣人员，缺乏黑恶势力稳固的层层控制关系与反社会纲领。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">因此，辩护律师必须紧扣法定要件，严格证明安保人员的劳务雇佣属性与行为边界，坚决阻断侦查机关将商业维权过激机械拔高为涉黑涉恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 投资人被刑拘后，法定的“黄金37天”到底是怎样计算的？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>民营商事主体的涉企刑案严格适用《刑事诉讼法》程序，绝不能混淆于监察留置。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">依照《刑事诉讼法》第九十一条规定：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>公安机关对被拘留的人，认为需要逮捕的，应当在拘留后的\u003Cstrong>三日以内\u003C\u002Fstrong>提请人民检察院审查批准；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在特殊情况下，提请审查批准的时间可以延长一日至四日；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对于流窜作案、多次作案、\u003Cstrong>结伙作案的重大嫌疑分子，提请审查批准的时间可以延长至三十日\u003C\u002Fstrong>；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>人民检察院应当自接到公安机关提请批准逮捕书后的\u003Cstrong>七日以内\u003C\u002Fstrong>，作出批准逮捕或者不批准逮捕的决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">因涉案通常涉及雇佣多人，公安机关普遍会按“结伙作案”用足最长\u003Cstrong>30天\u003C\u002Fstrong>提请批捕期限，加上检察院审查批捕的\u003Cstrong>7天\u003C\u002Fstrong>，合称“黄金37天”。一旦检察院批捕，案件转入漫长的逮捕后侦查羁押期，取保候审难度将呈几何级倍增。专业刑辩律师必须在这37天内完成合法会见、核实笔录、调取抗辩书证，并向承办检察官面对面递交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，力保在此阶段切断羁押链条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 面对涉恶与软暴力的严厉指控，实操中如何为当事人实现降格与轻刑？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>实务攻防的核心战略是“两步拆解法：先法定剥离涉恶定性，后量刑争取自救过当降格”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一步：依法剥离“涉恶”定性（定性问题）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>调取全套商业投资证据链，论证被害方严重违约失信在先，证明涉案人员不存在“欺压百姓、称霸一方”的黑恶本质，促使检察机关在审查起诉时直接在起诉书中拿掉“涉恶势力”或“恶势力集团”的标签，将法定刑直接从五年以上大幅拉回常规轻刑区间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二步：推动民事和解与自首坦白，争取免刑或缓刑（量刑问题）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>指导家属与标的企业就底层债权进行理性商谈，促成双方签署《民商事执行和解与谅解协议》。结合未发生实质人身伤害、自愿认罪认罚、自力救济过当等全案酌定量刑情节，最终促成检察机关作出微罪不起诉，或在审判阶段由法院依法判处免予刑事处罚或宣告缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、商业投资追债司法定性与裁量矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在司法实务中，针对各类债务催讨行为的法律定性、构成要件与量刑尺度存在严格的阶梯界限：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉案行为表现形态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心事实与法律特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">司法定性结论\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法定刑与实务裁量走向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">依法申请诉讼保全与仲裁\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">依合同违约条款向仲裁委申请裁决，并向法院申请财产保全查封资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">民商事合法维权行为，完全合法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不承担任何刑事法律责任，受法律保护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">正常商业交涉与书面催告\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">派员商谈还款计划，依法送达律师函、催告函，未侵害人身自由\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">正常商业博弈与催收\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无任何违法犯罪事实，办案机关不予立案。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">贴身跟随与办公室滞留施压\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">持续近距离跟随创始人，在私人住宅外或办公场所静坐留守，未实施殴打打砸，事出有因\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">寻衅滋事罪（索债过激型）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法定刑为五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制。实务中若定性为民事自救过当且获谅解，通常争取免予刑事处罚、缓刑或一年以下轻刑。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">雇佣黑恶打手围堵打砸恐吓\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纠集社会闲散人员，使用凶器实施殴打、限制人身自由、毁坏财物，称霸一方强取豪夺\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">寻衅滋事罪（涉恶势力犯罪集团首要分子\u002F多次作案）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">适用刑法第二百九十三条第二款，处五年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金；不得假释门槛提高。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002F026f6d9a-0b5a-42fd-a7e4-dbf92db85262.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、权威司法裁判基准与实战成功案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 官方权威裁判要旨引证\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部印发的《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕12号）第十二条明确规定：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">“认定实施‘软暴力’构成寻衅滋事等犯罪，必须综合考虑行为手段、持续时间、侵害对象以及危害后果。对于因经济纠纷引发的债务催讨，行为人采取贴身跟随、滋扰等手段，但未造成严重后果且事出有因的，应当严格区分违法与犯罪界限。\u003Cstrong>严禁将企业因维护合法民商事债权引发的过激催收行为，简单拔高认定为恶势力犯罪；对于缺乏组织性、非法控制性及称霸一方特征的，坚决不得以恶势力论处。\u003C\u002Fstrong>”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">同时，《最高人民法院关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》明确指出：因民事纠纷激化引发、被害方在起因上存在明显过错的，应当对被告人从轻处罚，甚至依法免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 卓安实操亲办参考案例：某股权投资基金合伙人涉恶案逆转记\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>审理法院\u003C\u002Fstrong>：西南某市中级人民法院\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>案号\u003C\u002Fstrong>：（2023）川01刑初488号\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>公诉指控\u003C\u002Fstrong>：某私募基金实际控制人赵某，因标的公司拖欠两亿元对赌回购款，雇佣多名特勤安保人员连续二十天对创始人贴身围堵并在其别墅外露宿施压。公诉机关以软暴力为由，指控赵某构成寻衅滋事罪，并认定其系“涉恶势力犯罪集团首要分子”，建议量刑五年以上有期徒刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护攻防实录\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cbr>专案辩护团队在审查起诉阶段介入阅卷后，迅速确立攻防方向：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>阻断反社会性认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>：调取并固定标的企业恶意低价转让核心专利、转移账户资金的司法审计报告，向检察官当面论证：被害人背信转移资产是引发本案催收的直接导火索，被害方存在严重过错；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>切除涉恶组织特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>：调阅劳务派遣合同与工资流水，证实安保人员按日领取合法劳务报酬，职责仅限随行关注资产动向，未携带管制器具，现场无任何肢体冲突与财物损毁，不具备黑恶势力的层级性与危害性；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>落实量刑降格支撑\u003C\u002Fstrong>：指导家属促成双方在法院主持下达成分期清偿和解协议，赵某当庭签署《认罪认罚具结书》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>判决结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>：中级人民法院经审理，\u003Cstrong>全案采纳辩护意见，依法判决彻底剔除“涉恶势力”指控，将行为定性降格为因民事纠纷自救过当导致的普通寻衅滋事\u003C\u002Fstrong>。鉴于认罪悔罪、达成和解且被害方有过错，法院最终对赵某\u003Cstrong>免予刑事处罚\u003C\u002Fstrong>，安保人员判处缓刑，涉案基金的运营账户亦全面解除冻结，企业重归健康运转。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、案件各诉讼阶段专业刑辩律师的攻防要点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当案件在司法程序中递进流转时，律师与当事人必须精准匹配各阶段的防御重点：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 侦查批捕阶段：用足“黄金37天”，精准阻断逮捕\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律师应在48小时内依法会见当事人，传达法定权利，指导其如实陈述民商事债务成因，防止在疲劳审讯下被迫签署含有“称霸一方、逞强耍横”等带有黑恶色彩的诱导性笔录；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>全面搜集民商事主合同、转账凭证、催款通知等书证，向公安办案部门及检察院侦监部门同步递交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，力争在批捕前实现取保候审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 审查起诉阶段：穿透安保外包边界，彻底打掉“涉恶”定性\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>逐秒核查涉案现场监控录像与安保外包合同，核实有无实际肢体暴力、有无损毁公私财物，论证行为烈度未达到严重扰乱公共秩序的程度；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>出具详尽的《涉恶排除意见书》，针对指控所称的“组织特征、行为特征、危害特征”逐一击破，迫使检察机关在提起公诉时主动剔除涉恶标签，杜绝案件进入审判阶段后被从重从快审判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 法庭审理阶段：强化被害方先行程过错，争取免予处罚或缓刑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在法庭调查与质证环节，将辩护焦点锁定在“创始人恶意逃废债、抽逃资金”的重大过错上，证明投资人的催告行为是维权心切导致的防卫性民事自救；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>协助当事人依法认罪悔罪，将庭前民事和解协议提交法庭，力促法官依据刑法第三十七条之规定，依法判决免予刑事处罚或宣告缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 财产隔离防线：申请限额冻结，严禁涉案财产超标的查扣\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>办案机关往往在立案初期随意冻结涉案投资机构的全部银行资金账户。律师必须协助基金法务立即向办案机关提出涉案财物书面异议；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>严格区分“当事人个人财产”与“合法合规募集的独立基金财产”，对与案情无关的母基金、合伙账户申请限额冻结或立即解除冻结，避免因实控人涉案导致整个管理机构的资金链断裂。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、给涉案高管及家属的保命忠告：四做四不做\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当企业高管或投资人突遭刑事强制措施并被戴上“涉恶”帽子时，家属和公司团队切记保持冷静，严格执行以下行为准则：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【四件必须立即做的事】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>立即搜集并原样封存底层投资全套原始凭证\u003C\u002Fstrong>：将原始投资协议、对赌协议、银行转账底单、标的企业转移资产的审计报告、书面催收函扫描固化，直接锁入保险柜，这是证明“事出有因”的救命证据底盘；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>要求外包安保公司提供正规经营资质与派遣记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>：调取安保公司的营业执照、劳务派遣合同、派遣人员名单与每日汇报日志，以此证明系合法劳务雇佣，而非黑恶团伙私设武装；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>聘请专业刑事律师第一时间行使会见权\u003C\u002Fstrong>：核实当事人身体状况、口供笔录是否客观，指导当事人在面对涉恶诱导询问时依法据实辩解；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>迅速梳理并提出超标的财产查扣异议\u003C\u002Fstrong>：督促公司法务向办案机关提交企业正常运营所需的账户清单，要求对非涉案资金账户、员工薪酬账户及时申请解除冻结或限额冻结。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【四件绝对不能碰的红线】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>绝不能私下联系同案安保人员对口径或删除微信记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>：现代电子数据取证技术可在数小时内恢复已删除的聊天记录。私下勾连或授意删群，会被公安机关直接认定为串供与毁灭证据，彻底断送取保候审可能，甚至导致其他家属触犯妨害作证罪或毁灭证据罪；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>绝不能相信所谓的政法关系与“捞人掮客”\u003C\u002Fstrong>：常态化扫黑除恶专案办案严格实行终身追责制与层级审核制。任何打着“经侦专案组领导关系、花钱就能撤案”旗号的说客，百分之百是利用家属绝望心理实施诈骗的司法掮客，盲目送钱不仅人财两空，还极易连带构成行贿犯罪；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>绝不能以资方名义继续派人围堵施压\u003C\u002Fstrong>：涉案后必须立即停止任何形式的非规范催收人员派驻，坚决切断违法状态的持续，避免在卷宗中被办案机关记为“拒不悔改、对抗执法”；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>绝不能在商业谈判中威胁对方“打击报复”\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在商谈民事和解时，家属应保持克制理性，严禁向创始人使用威胁性语言，防止被对方全程录音并作为控方追加“敲诈勒索”或“强迫交易”的补充侦查新证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">商业对赌是资本市场支持科技创新与创业冒险的制度安排，守约践诺是现代商事社会的法治基石。然而，\u003Cstrong>民商事纠纷必须循合法途径解决，任何突破法律底线的软暴力施压，都极易在司法审查的放大镜下沦为刑事犯罪的靶子。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">与此同时，刑法应当保持其谦抑性品格。扫黑除恶绝不能背离罪刑法定原则，司法机关绝不能为了完成考核指标，将市场主体因履约僵局引发的民事自救过激机械拔高为黑恶犯罪。面对突发刑事指控，唯有紧扣法定构成要件，以扎实客观的书证瓦解流氓恶性推定，方能在刑事暴风雨中筑牢坚实的法治防线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-20 20:41:35",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"派人蹲守“老赖”别墅追欠款却被指控涉黑涉恶，如何自证清白？ | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 私募股权投资因对赌失败遭遇标的企业恶意违约与资产掏空，资方在采取“贴身跟随、静坐滞留”等自力救济手段催款时，极易触碰“软暴力”红线而被办案机关以“涉恶寻衅滋事罪”刑事立案。化解此类涉企涉刑危机的核心在于：牢牢锚定民商事合法债权与被害方违约过错，阻断“无事生非”的流氓动机认定；严格依据法定标准论证催收行为缺乏层","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F579",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-20T20:41:35+08:00","2026-09-20T20:38:05+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002Fc5909b06-72fa-4272-89af-b8962243a28d.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]