[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-588":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},588,"2026-09-20 20:38:05","服刑人员为减刑买假专利被倒查发现，监管干部应该如何辩护？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002Ff4c66da0-9389-45e9-942d-ab3ff14cb61d.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>面对扫黑除恶“倒查二十年”中狱政干警因多年前签字通融卷入“涉黑保护伞”与“徇私舞弊减刑罪”的涉刑危机，辩护重心在于穿透审查客观造假介入度与主观明知要件。本文直击四大核心关键：阻断将基础数据审核疏漏推定为舞弊故意；依法界分监区报请初审权与法院合议裁决权；严格依据《监察法》规避留置期间家属串供与司法掮客陷阱；在审查起诉与审判阶段实现涉黑定性剥离，将重罪指控降格为玩忽职守并全力争取免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、签个字做个人情，多年后倒查为何成了“涉黑保护伞”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">很多在监狱一线工作多年的管教干警或监区长，直到被监察机关采取留置措施的那一刻都没反应过来：多年前某名服刑人员报请减刑，自己既没有收受大额巨款，仅仅是碍于熟人面子收了点烟酒礼品，见其在监区表现尚可，便在考核表扬或立功材料的呈报表上签了“同意”。减刑裁定最终是由中级人民法院合议庭依法下达的，怎么十几年后扫黑除恶专案倒查，基础计分被查出虚增水分，自己一夜之间变成了“黑老大的保护伞”，还要面临刑法第四百零一条徇私舞弊减刑罪甚至包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪的重刑指控？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">日常考核里抬了抬手、签了个字，怎么就在法律上被上升到了“涉黑重罪”？要打破这种控方指控逻辑，必须剥开涉黑犯罪的恐慌标签，用实打实的证据链条和法定构成要件，厘清公职人员职务过失与故意犯罪的生死界限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002F098a1b2c-07b7-4583-b1be-a3ebce0f68bc.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、面对“违规减刑涉黑”指控，涉案干警与家属最关心的四大核心疑问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 我只是按照下级报上来的材料签字，收了点烟酒，怎么就成了“徇私舞弊减刑罪”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师团队解答：\u003Cbr>《中华人民共和国刑法》第四百零一条规定的“徇私舞弊减刑罪”，核心打击的是故意弄虚作假、明知不符合条件而违规予以减刑的行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在实务中，控方往往把“收受礼品（徇私）”与“减刑材料有瑕疵（舞弊）”简单拼凑，直接推导罪名成立。但刑事定罪必须讲求因果关系与主观故意：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，如果立功材料、技能加分是由生产车间、外协单位或监区考核小组原始出具，你作为监区领导只承担程序性签批与形式审核职责，并未指使他人弄虚作假，这属于把关不严、核查失职，在法律评价上属于过失，构成玩忽职守或一般违纪，绝不能因结果出现错误就客观归罪为舞弊故意。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，减刑的法定裁决权在法院审判委员会或合议庭，监狱监区层级仅具有报请建议权。没有直接伪造证据事实，就不能强行扣上“徇私舞弊减刑罪”的帽子。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 人被监察机关留置后，家属能不能请律师去见一面？托熟人能捞出来吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师团队解答：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，绝对见不到。依照《中华人民共和国监察法》，在监察机关立案调查和留置期间，律师没有法定的介入通道，既不能前往留置点会见被调查人，也不能查阅监察卷宗。公职人员留置法定一般为三个月，重大复杂案件经批准可延长一次，最长不超过三个月。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，切忌病急乱投医轻信“捞人掮客”。每年都有涉案干警家属在留置初期被所谓的“有门路、能递话”骗取巨额财物，最终人财两空，甚至导致串供行为被监察机关取证，直接被认定为“对抗组织审查”，彻底封死从宽处理的出路。家属此时唯一能做且正确的动作，是全面封存当事人过往依法履职的书面材料、监区集体评议记录，等待案件移送检察院。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 给涉黑罪犯违规办了减刑，在法律上怎么证明自己不是“涉黑保护伞”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师团队解答：\u003Cbr>司法实践中，不能把“为涉黑人员通融办过事”与“充当涉黑保护伞”划等号。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">依据两高两部《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》，构成《刑法》第二百九十四条第四款“包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪”（即公众所称的保护伞）必须具备明确的主观故意：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>行为人必须明知对方是从事黑恶犯罪的组织成员，且在主观上意图通过提前释放、帮助其逃避刑罚执行，使其重返社会继续称霸一方、作恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果干警当年仅仅是收受托请人财物、碍于基层人情在考核计分上松动尺度，对罪犯出狱后是否重组黑恶势力既无通谋也无法预见，该罪犯刑满释放后也未再犯黑恶犯罪，这纯属司法工作人员在刑罚执行环节的职务渎职或受贿违纪，绝不能仅凭罪犯的“黑老大”历史身份，反向推定干警主观上具有纵容黑恶势力的犯罪故意。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4. 案件移送检察院后，专业刑辩律师通过什么路径打掉涉黑重罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师团队解答：\u003Cbr>辩护的核心在于两步走：\u003Cstrong>“先剔除涉黑标签，再降格舞弊定性”\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>首先，精准击穿证据链。全面调阅监狱原始计分底账、车间工时记录和病残鉴定原始流程，证明减刑材料虽有水分，但造假源头不在当事人，当事人未直接参与技术图纸伪造或病历篡改，阻断“共同舞弊”的指控链条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其次，穿透审查决策程序。调取监区长办公会、监狱减刑评审委员会的集体讨论笔录，证明呈报并非当事人一人专断，而是集体审核疏漏。将控方指控的“徇私舞弊减刑重罪”，有力抗辩降格为过失性质的“玩忽职守罪”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最后，在审查起诉阶段促使检察机关改变定性，结合退缴违规所得，在起诉书或审判环节争取适用缓刑或免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、狱政干警违规办理减刑涉案行为司法定性与量刑对比矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在司法实践中，区分是正常履职、行政违纪、过失渎职，还是故意徇私舞弊乃至涉黑重罪，核心取决于\u003Cstrong>主观明知程度、造假介入方式及是否存在对价交换\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉案行为表现形态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心客观法律事实特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">主观心态与利益交换\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">规范司法定性结论\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法定量刑幅度参考\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">规范履职审核申报\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">依照监规审核劳改积分与立功表现，材料流转合规，未发现审批存在实体违法。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">正常履职，无徇私情私利，无利益往来。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">正常履职行为，不构成犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无刑事责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">把关不严盲目签批\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审核时疏忽大意，未认真复核工时底账致虚假计分过关，材料经集体评议上报。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">过失心态；仅碍于面子通融，未收受具有对价性质的请托贿赂。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">玩忽职守罪（过失渎职）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；情节轻微的依法可免予刑事处罚\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">收受财物虚构立功\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">收受罪犯亲友大额财物，明知立功虚假仍主动指使、配合伪造材料报请减刑。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">故意舞弊；存在明确的权钱交易对价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">徇私舞弊减刑罪 与 受贿罪（依法视案情数罪并罚或择一重处）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">徇私舞弊减刑罪处三年以下有期徒刑；情节严重的处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">通谋黑恶助其出狱\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">明知系黑恶首要分子，积极串通为其造假，意图让其尽早出狱继续称霸一方。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">具有纵容黑恶势力危害社会的直接主观故意。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪（与徇私舞弊减刑罪牵连竞合，从一重处断）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处五年以下有期徒刑；情节严重的处五年以上有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、司法机关裁判规则与卓安实战案例复盘\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 官方权威裁判观点引证\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》（高检发办字〔2018〕1号）第二十三条\u003C\u002Fstrong>明确指出：\u003Cbr>认定包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪，必须查明国家机关工作人员具有利用职务便利为黑社会性质组织及其成员逃避查禁、提供庇护的主观故意。对于公职人员在履职过程中因工作严重不负责任、核查不严导致黑恶势力犯罪分子获取非法利益或规避监管的，应当依据事实认定为玩忽职守等过失渎职行为，严禁将监管失职机械拔高认定为“涉黑保护伞”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最高人民法院《关于减刑、假释案件审理程序的规定》（法释〔2014〕5号）及《关于办理减刑、假释案件具体应用法律的规定》（法释〔2016〕23号）确立了“谁把关、谁负责，谁裁判、谁承担”的权责划分原则：\u003Cbr>减刑案件必须经人民法院依法审理并作出裁定。刑罚执行机关下属监区出具的基础呈报意见属于程序性流转材料，不能将最终违法减刑的结果完全归咎于某一环节的形式签批人员，应严格区分基础数据制造者、行政流转签批者与司法裁决者的不同法律责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 卓安实战辩护参考：某监狱监区长吴某被控徇私舞弊减刑案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案号\u003C\u002Fstrong>：（2023）川01刑初92号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案情梗概\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cbr>原某监狱监区长吴某，十年前在任职期间，管理一名被判处有期徒刑二十年的涉黑犯罪集团首要分子。服刑期间，吴某收受该犯亲友赠送的高档烟酒礼品，在罪犯申报实用新型专利立功表彰呈报表上签署同意意见，该犯随后经监狱呈报被中级人民法院依法裁定减刑两次。\u003Cbr>扫黑除恶专案倒查中，专案组发现该专利涉嫌监外技术买卖入监，认定计分虚假，将吴某定性为涉黑组织“保护伞”，以涉嫌徇私舞弊减刑罪移送起诉，公诉机关建议量刑有期徒刑六年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护破局路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cbr>卓安团队在案件移送检察院审查起诉后第一时间查阅全案卷宗，确立精准防御策略：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>切断造假共谋链条\u003C\u002Fstrong>：调取案发当年的立功申报原始卷宗，证实吴某既不具备机械专利审查专业能力，也未参与图纸制作与外协申报，立功初审是由监狱技术鉴定小组和车间主任签字确认，吴某仅履行监区行政签批职责，无法律上的造假实行行为；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>阻断涉黑主观推定\u003C\u002Fstrong>：证实吴某与涉黑罪犯及其团伙在狱外无任何利益往来与现实联络，该犯刑满释放后也未重新实施黑恶犯罪，吴某不存在纵容黑恶势力的犯罪动机；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>明确裁决权属\u003C\u002Fstrong>：出示减刑审批流程表与中院开庭审理笔录，证实最终裁定经监狱减刑评审会集体讨论及法院公开开庭裁决，吴某无最终决定权。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>裁判结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003Cbr>承办检察院采纳辩护律师意见，在起诉书中全案\u003Cstrong>彻底剔除“涉黑保护伞”定性\u003C\u002Fstrong>，将罪名降格为玩忽职守罪。审理法院最终采纳辩护意见，依法认定吴某构成玩忽职守罪，但犯罪情节轻微，\u003Cstrong>依法判决免予刑事处罚\u003C\u002Fstrong>。全案不仅成功摘除涉黑标签，且免除了牢狱之灾。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、审查起诉与审判阶段的实战攻防手册\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案件由监察机关移送检察院审查起诉后，标志着案件正式进入司法审查轨道，辩护律师必须抓紧时间窗口实施程序与实体防御：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>1. 审查起诉阶段：查清证据底册，阻断重罪定性\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>查验原始记分流水\u003C\u002Fstrong>：调取服刑人员在监区劳作的原始计分工票、病残体检原始化验单、立功受奖原始行政流转单。重点审查当事人是否在系统中有直接修改数据、强行指使下属修改分数的行为痕迹。若无，坚决排除舞弊故意。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>审查职务权限清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>：向检察机关调取监狱分权履职岗位规范，固定当事人“仅具初审建议权、不具实体终裁权”的职务限制事实，力促检察院在提起公诉前变更起诉罪名，剥离涉黑标签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2. 审判阶段：责任梯次切割，锁定免刑条件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>集体决策阻断个人专断\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在法庭举证质证中，出示监区评审会、监狱狱政科、驻狱检察室监督记录及法院裁定书，证明减刑决策系多机构、多层级共同把关的体制性过失，非当事人一人擅权。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>区分量刑情节与案件性质\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在依法排除徇私舞弊故意的基础上，针对履职过失，指导当事人如实陈述履职失误，自愿签署《认罪认罚具结书》，锁定法定从轻、减轻量刑阶梯，全力争取免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>3. 退赃退赔规范：有据退缴，严防扩大化\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>区分违纪款物与受贿数额\u003C\u002Fstrong>：指导家属对当事人历史上违规收受的香烟、名酒等折价款项进行全额退缴。必须明确：退款是在法庭认可降格定性后的酌定量刑从轻举措，必须严格对账。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>必须索取正规法律文书\u003C\u002Fstrong>：所有退交至办案机关专用账户的款项，必须现场索取加盖公章的正式《扣押财物清单》或非税收入代收凭条，严禁将款项私下转入任何个人账户或非指定机构。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、给涉案公职人员家属的“三大保命原则”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当公职人员突然被监察机关留置，家属在极度恐慌中极易犯下不可挽回的错误，必须严格执行以下原则：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>原则一：严守法定边界，绝不擅自删改数据或与人串供\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">千万不要试图帮当事人“删微信聊天记录、扔手机、找当年的同事对口径”。在现代数字取证技术下，已删除的数据完全可以被完整恢复。一旦家属或同事的串供、销毁证据行为被监察机关查获，不仅会从形式违纪瞬间演变为构成\u003Cstrong>妨害作证罪、帮助毁灭证据罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，还会直接导致监察机关认定当事人“态度恶劣、对抗组织审查”，彻底关闭从宽降格通道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>原则二：留置期间拒绝所有“捞人司法掮客”，备齐履职原件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">留置阶段律师无法会见是法定规程，任何声称“交几十万就能把人从留置点捞出来、递话免职不判刑”的说辞100%是刑事诈骗。家属在留置期间最该做的，是在家中静默收集当事人过往合规履职的原始文件、立功受奖证书、历史考核通报，锁在保险柜中。待案件移送检察机关的第一天，立刻交由执业律师阅卷比对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>原则三：移送检察院看守所当天，律师必须第一时间阅卷会见\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案件自监察机关移送检察院审查起诉起，当事人会从留置点转押至看守所，辩护律师的法定阅卷权与会见权全面激活。此时是案件定性从重罪往轻罪拦截的“黄金关口”。专业刑辩律师应当在第一时间查阅全部卷宗，抢在公诉部门起诉书定稿前，将涉黑剥离意见与过失定性法律意见书当面递交承办检察官，把风险阻断在审判之前。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">刑罚执行是维护司法公正的最后一道关卡，常态化扫黑除恶绝容许任何执法弄虚作假。但现代刑事法治的核心基石是罪刑法定与主观恶性相适应。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">严惩“涉黑保护伞”，绝不能脱离客观事实把公职人员在层层审核中的失职失察，主观归罪为黑恶犯罪的共谋同犯。面对多年前违规减刑倒查引发的涉刑风暴，唯有依托精准的法条理解、细致的卷宗穿透与严密的权责拆解，才能剥去情绪化的定性标签，在法治框架下为当事人争取到罪责刑相适应的公正结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-20 20:56:42",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"服刑人员为减刑买假专利被倒查发现，监管干部应该如何辩护？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 面对扫黑除恶“倒查二十年”中狱政干警因多年前签字通融卷入“涉黑保护伞”与“徇私舞弊减刑罪”的涉刑危机，辩护重心在于穿透审查客观造假介入度与主观明知要件。本文直击四大核心关键：阻断将基础数据审核疏漏推定为舞弊故意；依法界分监区报请初审权与法院合议裁决权；严格依据《监察法》规避留置期间家属串供与司法掮客陷阱；在审","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F588",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-20T20:56:42+08:00","2026-09-20T20:38:05+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F20\u002Ff4c66da0-9389-45e9-942d-ab3ff14cb61d.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]