[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-608":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},608,"2026-09-22 04:29:51","雇水军造谣压价收购，为何构成新型网络涉恶？ | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fd0c6e906-e6fb-4700-a1b8-65e52f43ca26.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">雇佣网络水军虚构财务造假并向金融机构施压迫使廉价出售资产，已突破正当商业竞争边界，符合利用信息网络实施“软暴力”强迫交易的构成要件。司法实践依据《反有组织犯罪法》及相关规定，往往将有组织出资压价方按涉恶首要分子立案。抗辩关键在于查明出资人是否明知虚假信息，并厘清公关公司独立意志与委托意图的界限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">资本并购重组中以信息不对称为由调整交易对价，属于常见的商业磋商过程。但在司法审查中，一旦收购方为压低资产价格而雇佣网络水军虚构财务造假、向监管机构与金融机构寄发不实举报信，办案机关极易将该行为穿透评价为利用信息网络实施的有组织违法犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">围绕这一从商事竞争向涉恶刑事指控滑移的严峻态势，资深法律观察员专访了卓安律师事务所首席律师成安博士（法学博士、原省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问）。成安博士结合近三十年刑事辩护与经侦指导实务经验，对涉网恶势力案件的司法裁判尺度与辩护路径展开了全面解剖。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、认知的错位：线上资本施压何以触碰涉恶红线\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法律观察员\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在很多私募股权基金负责人或并购操盘手看来，通过财经公关释放舆论压力、向授信银行发送检举信以压低标的企业收购估值，属于商事谈判策略中的极端手段。当事人往往难以理解：全案没有线下人员聚集，更无任何肢体冲突，为何公安机关在立案侦查时会直接认定为“新型网络涉恶犯罪”？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：这种认知盲区，根源于对中国有组织犯罪法定惩治边界的理解脱节。很多人以为不流血、不动刀枪就绝不可能涉黑涉恶，但我国刑法与刑事政策早已完成了对涉网“软暴力”的法网覆盖。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二十三条第一款明确规定，利用网络实施的犯罪，符合法定黑恶势力组织特征的，应当认定为有组织犯罪。该条第二款更直接对“软暴力”做出了立法界定：为谋取非法利益或者形成非法影响，有组织地进行滋扰、纠缠、哄闹、聚众造势等，对他人形成心理强制，足以影响正常社会秩序、经济秩序的，属于有组织犯罪的手段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">两高两部《关于办理利用信息网络实施黑恶势力犯罪刑事案件若干问题的意见》第四条与第五条进一步明确，通过网络散布虚假或者负面信息，实施威胁、恐吓、滋扰，强迫他人交易或者索取财物的，依法按黑恶势力犯罪惩处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>软暴力手段在资本领域的司法认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在资本收购场景中，合法的商业抗辩建立在事实求真的尽职调查之上。如果操盘方出资数百万，指使网络公关公司操控成千上万个水军账号，全网散布虚构的财务暴雷黑料，并精准向标的企业的授信银行和核心大客户寄发缺乏事实依据的举报信，其法律性质就发生了根本变异。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这种行为的本质是利用银行断贷和客户退单的致命恐慌，在精神上对目标企业法定代表人形成不可抗拒的心理强制，使其在丧失自主交易意志的情况下，被迫签署对价极不合理的股权转让协议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指：你虽然没有派人去对方厂区泼油漆、堵大门，但你通过数以万计的虚假言论与给银行发恐吓式举报信，掐断了对方企业的现金流和声誉命脉。对方如果不把资产白菜价卖给你，企业就会在几天之内倒闭清盘。这种利用商业恐慌剥夺他人公平交易自主权的做法，在司法机关眼中，与传统线下强买强卖的涉恶霸痞没有任何实质区别。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、定性的穿透：强迫交易与恶势力集团的罪责逻辑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法律观察员\u003C\u002Fstrong>：公诉机关在此类案件中，通常构建怎样的罪名体系？为什么躲在幕后的实际出资人，往往会被直接指控为犯罪集团的“首要分子”？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：控方的起诉逻辑往往采取“实质行为定基础罪名+组织形态定恶势力集团”的双层穿透结构。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在罪名选择上，指控的核心是《刑法》第二百二十六条规定的强迫交易罪，尤其是第（三）项“强迫他人转让或者收购公司、企业的股份、债券或者其他资产”。如果涉案金额巨大或者造成企业停产破产等严重后果，依法对应法定刑第二档“三年以上七年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金”。若出资人在此过程中直接以停止扩散负面舆情为要挟索取财产，控方还会叠加《刑法》第二百七十四条敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>幕后出资人为何成为首要打击对象\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">许多操盘手认为自己只是向公关公司采购了“品牌优化服务”，具体发帖由公关公司和底层水军实施，自己至多构成帮助犯。这种抗辩在一线审查中很难获得采纳。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据两高两部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》第十一条的明确规定：“雇佣、指使他人采用‘软暴力’手段强迫交易、敲诈勒索，构成强迫交易罪、敲诈勒索罪的，对雇佣者、指使者，一般应当以共同犯罪中的主犯论处。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关在梳理案件时，遵循的是“资金流向决定组织地位”的原则。出资方提供了违法行动所必需的全部资金，指定了精准打击的目标对象，享有资产被压价收购后的最终收益。公关公司及其雇佣的水军只是出资人实现交易目的的执行工具。控方据此推定出资人是整起犯罪行动的发起者、策划者与指挥者，直接将其升格为恶势力犯罪集团的首要分子。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通过梳理司法审判标准，传统涉恶与涉网资本涉恶的裁判考量存在鲜明对照：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查维度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">传统线下涉恶犯罪\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">新型涉网资本型涉恶犯罪\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">物理空间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">实体商铺、建筑工地、客运集散地\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">社交媒体、财经资讯平台、电子邮箱通道\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为样态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">围堵聚众、拉挂横幅、拦截纠缠\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">批量发帖、算法控评、向监管部门不实检举\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">强制原理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">现实暴力威胁与人身自由剥夺\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">人为切断授信与供应链，制造毁灭性经营风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">利益实现\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">索取保护费、垄断特种行业经营权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">压低优质标的估值、强行廉价入股或吞并资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法定罪名\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">寻衅滋事罪、聚众斗殴罪、非法拘禁罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">强迫交易罪、敲诈勒索罪、损害商业信誉罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指：公检法查办涉恶案件向来是“打蛇打头，追赃追源”。水军公司只是拿钱卖力的外围团伙，出资方才是这场资本收割的真正发起人和最大受益人。只要数百万资金是出自操盘手的账户，司法机关就倾向于认定操盘手是全案的核心主导者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、实务的隐线：出资人意志关联与组织化认定的抗辩要领\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法律观察员\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在面临如此严重的指控时，涉案出资人是否有法定的出罪和降格路径？很多当事人在被羁押前往往准备了完备的《战略公关顾问协议》，其中专门设置了“服务必须符合国家法律规范”的免责条款，这种民事约定在刑事审判中能发挥作用吗？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：依赖民事格式合同中的合规条款寻求免责，在刑事司法审判中基本不被采信。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在穿透式审判理念下，几百万资金以“顾问费”名义流向公关黑产公司的事实，反而会被控方作为证明出资人与公关团队存在“雇佣指使”客观联络的核心书证。民事合同的表象根本遮蔽不了实际的违法意图。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">但是，这绝不意味着涉案人员无法辩护。专业辩护的核心，在于阻断犯意传递链条，并将松散的商事委托从“犯罪集团”的定性中剥离出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>公关公司固有业务与出资人意志的切割点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉案的网络公关公司，通常本身就是一个长期从事网络有偿删帖、炒作黑料的非法网络组织。出资人在委托时，其真实犯意究竟是什么？这是决定当事人是否承担重罪责任的生命线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">如果证据能够证明，出资人委托的初衷仅是针对目标公司客观存在的财务瑕疵展开合规层面的舆论监督，但公关公司为了向金主夸大战果、证明自身价值，\u003Cstrong>自行伪造了恶劣的虚假造假材料，并擅自向银行发送不实检举信\u003C\u002Fstrong>，那么公关公司的行为在刑法上就构成了“实行过限”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在缺乏犯意联络的情形下，出资人不应当对公关公司超出委托范围的恶劣软暴力行为承担主犯责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>恶势力犯罪集团组织要件的阻断路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据《反有组织犯罪法》及2019年两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》，认定为恶势力犯罪集团，必须具备组织特征：即三人以上，有较为固定的首要分子和骨干成员，有明确的组织纪律或管理规约，经常纠集在一起多次实施违法犯罪活动。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在卓安团队既往办理的涉黑涉恶大案中，组织特征的缺失往往是摘掉黑恶帽子的决定性切口。例如在\u003Cstrong>陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，辩护律师指出涉案人员纯属同学老乡因哥们义气形成的松散社交圈，缺乏组织规约与经济控制特征，法院最终全盘采纳辩护意见打掉涉黑罪名，仅按轻微犯罪轻判一年；在\u003Cstrong>孙某45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，团队同样通过论证案涉聚众斗殴系普通经济纠纷引发，不能认定为涉黑标志性事件，成功为当事人大幅下调量刑与罚金。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在网络资本涉恶案件中，出资人与外部公关公司之间，本质上属于单次或者临时性的劳务采购合同关系。出资人从未参与公关公司的内部层级分工，没有制定过内部规约，更不存在对公关员工的人身控制与组织约束。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">因此，辩护律师必须紧扣《反有组织犯罪法》的组织要件，主张该民商事委托不具备集团犯罪的组织稳定性与人员依附性，坚决排除恶势力犯罪集团的指控标签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F1945926b-9bed-4842-a5c0-ef8175667ebe.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、处置的路径：从涉恶定性向单一经济犯罪的理性剥离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法律观察员\u003C\u002Fstrong>：从程序和实操角度来看，当事人面临刑事强制措施后，家属与辩护律师应当在何时介入？具体的救济步骤与证据审查抓手应当如何落地？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：涉恶案件一旦立案，通常会伴随指定管辖、异地羁押以及从严审查批捕。辩护工作必须在法定时间窗口内以微观证据为抓手展开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据《刑事诉讼法》第九十一条规定，公安机关对抓获的犯罪嫌疑人提请审查批准逮捕的时间最长为三十天，检察机关审查批捕的时限为七天。这“三十七天”是阻断涉恶指控定型化的首要关口。卓安团队在介入此类案件时，通常遵循以下三个步骤推进：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第一步：在审查批捕期阻断主观故意的推定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在检察机关收到《提请批准逮捕书》的七天期限内，律师应向检察机关侦查监督部门正式提交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》及《调取有利于犯罪嫌疑人证据申请书》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">重点核查当事人与公关公司的全部微信沟通记录、邮件往来与会议纪要，严格界定出资人的主观意志是“正常的商事调查与尽职报告披露”，还是“明知材料虚假而指令全网造谣”。只要证据显示出资人曾明确提示“一切材料必须有财务底稿支撑”，或者对公关公司伪造虚假数据并向银行恶意寄信的行为不知情，就能在审查批捕阶段切断出资人与公关公司的共同犯罪故意，争取检察机关作出不予批准逮捕决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第二步：攻坚电子数据与审计结论的排他性\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉案水军的发帖量、转发量和点击量，直接决定了寻衅滋事或强迫交易罪的情节严重标准。根据《关于办理利用信息网络实施黑恶势力犯罪刑事案件若干问题的意见》及最高法相关规定，电子数据必须具备真实性与完整性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安团队前中院刑庭副庭长魏军律师与前公诉人何冰冰律师在多维实战质证中总结出关键审查标准：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>质证电子数据原始载体的扣押与提取程序是否规范，校验和（MD5值）是否前后一致；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>审查涉案几十万次点击中，是否存在黑产自动化脚本生成的虚假机器刷量，必须从真实浏览中予以扣减；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>核查审计报告引用的所谓“被害企业损失”，是否混入了宏观经济波动、企业自身经营不善导致的其他亏损，切断其与网络言论之间的单一因果关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第三步：依法推动涉黑涉恶定性彻底剥离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在事实查清的基础上，辩护律师应向承办检察官和合议庭出具详尽辩护意见，援引2019年两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》第五条关于“因民商事纠纷、合法债务纠纷而引发以及其他确属事出有因的违法犯罪活动，不应作为恶势力案件处理”的法定规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">如果出资方能够证明估值调整建立在标的企业存在未披露债务、关联交易等真实瑕疵基础之上，即便维权手段过激，也绝非无事生非的恶势力犯罪。通过向法庭全面论证，依法将案件降格为《刑法》第二百二十一条规定的损害商业信誉、商品声誉罪等单一罪名，并在积极退赔退缴、促成双方商事和解的前提下，依法争取相对不起诉、免予刑事处罚或宣告缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在现代资本市场中，信息的真实传递是维持公平交易秩序的基石。出资雇佣网络水军进行恶意造谣、通过切断信贷施压迫使他人低价出让资产，正在成为司法机关常态化扫黑除恶中重点整治的新型涉网涉恶行为。面对严峻的刑事法律风险，商业主体必须摒弃“未动用物理暴力即非违法”的陈旧观念，恪守商业竞争的法治红线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉网涉恶案件的从严打击态势下，辩护的价值不仅在于反驳不当指控，更在于协助司法机关在复杂的资本表象与定性冲动中精准厘清合法与违法的界限。正如卓安首席律师成安博士所倡导的，穿透式事实梳理与严密的程序监督，才是守住罪刑法定底线、避免民营企业与普通从业者被误伤的根本路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专案研判支持：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>学术与实务指导：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 成安博士（卓安律师事务所首席律师、法学博士、原省级公安厅特聘专家顾问）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>协同办案机制：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依托卓安“控、辩、审、学”四维实战研判体系（原法官、原检察官与法学学者集体论证）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>核心业务标签：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 近30年刑事法律实务经验 | 百人级刑事专业律师团队 | 刑事风控与合规 | 刑事危机应对与化解 | 重大疑难刑事案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 04:28:38",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"雇水军造谣压价收购，为何构成新型网络涉恶？ | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","雇佣网络水军虚构财务造假并向金融机构施压迫使廉价出售资产，已突破正当商业竞争边界，符合利用信息网络实施“软暴力”强迫交易的构成要件。司法实践依据《反有组织犯罪法》及相关规定，往往将有组织出资压价方按涉恶首要分子立案。抗辩关键在于查明出资人是否明知虚假信息，并厘清公关公司独立意志与委托意图的界限。 资本并购重组中以信息不","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F608",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T04:28:38+08:00","2026-09-22T04:29:51+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fd0c6e906-e6fb-4700-a1b8-65e52f43ca26.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]