[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-629":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},629,"2026-09-22 20:28:44","矿上跟村民起过冲突，老板被按涉黑立案，如何摘掉涉黑“帽子”？ | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fe2e276bf-ac00-475f-9dc4-81fa1c50f7aa.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">企业主若因行业竞争或民间纠纷被拔高指控为黑社会性质组织首要分子，脱罪核心在于切断“组织特征”与“危害性特征”。关键在于证明成员间无严密纪律与层级管控，涉案行为系偶发纠纷，未在行业形成非法控制。法定特征存在证据断裂时，可依法阻断涉黑定性，促使法院改判普通轻罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉黑涉恶案件的审查起诉与审判实践中，控方往往倾向于将民营企业数年间的零散经济纠纷、行政违章以及员工个人的过激行为，组装拼接为犯罪组织的法定特征。特别是在一些民营经济活跃的传统行业，企业在日常经营中产生的各类民商事摩擦，极易因外部举报或办案指标压力被拔高定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对动辄十几年乃至更重的法定刑档次，涉案企业负责人和普通员工往往陷入防卫失当的困境。如何穿透指控材料建立反向质证链条，帮助法庭在多重公诉压力下回归事实与法定要件，是涉黑刑辩的核心课题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、从市场博弈到黑恶罪名：民营企业涉黑指控的司法发生学\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">回顾近年来的审判实践可以发现，相当一部分涉黑案件的源头，并非典型的暴力犯罪集团，而是身处沙石采掘、房屋拆迁、工程分包、民间借贷等领域的民营企业。这类行业普遍存在资金密集、竞争激烈、纠纷频发的特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在特定办案背景下，部分办案机关为了完成阶段性考核，容易出现将零散违法行为进行系统化组装的倾向。一家企业在数年间发生的偶发民事争执、员工个人的斗殴、或者因催要欠款引发的过激行为，一旦被机械地串联进同一个因果链条，原本的商事主体就极易被推演为具有层级结构的黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">法学博士、卓安律师事务所首席律师成安博士在分析此类案件时指出，很多民营企业之所以被卷入涉黑重案，深层原因往往在于司法认定对商事纠纷与有组织犯罪边界的混淆。一旦办案机关先入为主地确立了涉黑审查框架，正常的生产经营活动就会被解读为“以商养黑”，合法的商业利润会被推定为“黑金积累”，而企业内部的日常管理则可能被套用为“帮规戒条”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这种拔高定性的做法，不仅让当事人面临极严苛的刑罚，更会导致企业合法资产被整体查封冻结，造成实体企业瘫痪。因此，专业辩护的第一步，必须直面这种深层认知偏差，在浩繁的卷宗中准确寻找法定构成要件缺失的客观依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、标杆实录：采矿纠纷案如何全面撕开涉黑定性\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在卓安律师事务所办理的真实大案中，陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案，具有极高的实操参考价值。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">该案当事人陈某早年跟随亲属在某县从事沙金开采。随着采矿业务的推进，陈某先后纠集了部分同学和老乡参与经营，期间在当地引发了数起聚众斗殴与寻衅滋事事件。公诉机关据此认定，陈某形成了所谓的“不成文规矩”，逐步演变为以其为组织者、领导者的黑社会性质组织，指控罪名极为严重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">承办律师介入该案后，并未停留在泛泛的情感辩解，而是直接将审查重点锁定在《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条、《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及相关司法解释规定的“组织特征”上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>松散纽带与法定纪律的实质区隔\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据法律规定，黑社会性质组织必须具备稳定的犯罪组织架构，有明确的组织者、领导者，骨干成员基本固定，并有严格的组织纪律与规约来维持其运作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护团队在逐页核对案卷笔录后发现，公诉机关指控的“不成文规矩”，实质上仅是个别证人证言中提到的“不听话会被斥责或偶有推搡”。涉案人员之间既没有成文的章程，也没有成体系的奖惩细则，更不存在脱离组织就要受到惩戒的帮规。相反，人员流动极为频繁，多人仅是在农闲时前来帮工或临时站场，平时各谋生路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">成安律师在研判此类案件时强调，黑社会性质组织依靠的是高度异化的人身依附与惩戒机制，而普通民间犯罪团伙往往仅靠“哥们义气”或短期劳务利益维系。如果把生活中的斥责、江湖义气中的面子观念，无限扩大解释为黑社会的组织纪律，就会彻底架空刑法关于组织特征的法定门槛。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指不能把普通人之间松散的称兄道弟、偶尔发脾气训话，硬说成是纪律严明的犯罪组织家法。没有铁打的班底和森严的纪律，组织特征从根本上就立不住脚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>心证逆转：将“江湖义气”还原为普通社会交往\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护人多次前往看守所核实细节，并主动与检察官、合议庭法官展开多轮法理沟通。辩护意见明确指出：该团伙缺乏组织牢固性与经济管控特征，成员各自经济独立，陈某并未建立起依靠违法犯罪活动向组织成员定期发放资金或进行人身控制的经济机制。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在庭审中，辩护律师出示了详尽的人员流动轨迹比对表与资金流水穿透记录，证明所谓的涉黑组织在客观层面上完全是一盘散沙。面对客观证据链条的断裂，法庭的心证最终发生逆转。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">市中级人民法院最终采纳了卓安律师的核心辩护意见，依法判决对陈某不予认定组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪。全案涉黑指控被全盘推翻，陈某仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。当事人的人身自由与合法经营资产均依法得到了有效保全。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F01f4ff35-e142-4a35-980d-307b835b5d8f.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、责任切分与要件瓦解：多罪名交织重案的降格路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">如果说陈某案展示了如何通过攻破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑，那么在建工拆迁领域的董某案与砂石行业的刘某某案，则体现了在面对多项严重罪名并罚时，如何进行精准的实体责任切分与量刑降格。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">以董某案为例，董某参与了某涉案团伙的房屋拆迁和土建工程，被检方认定为涉黑组织骨干成员，并指控其涉及敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序等四项重罪。起诉书指控其敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏财物情节严重，面临极高的基准刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">争议焦点\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">控方指控逻辑（拔高定性）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">卓安辩护反切要点（法理还原）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">敲诈勒索认定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">施工亏本后围堵企业、索要赔偿款，指控构成敲诈勒索罪且数额巨大\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">系真实工程欠款纠纷，手段有过激但无非法占有目的，主观目的合法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉黑组织地位\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">参与多起拆迁冲突，认定为骨干成员，应对组织全部罪行承担连带责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">收入归主犯个人，缺乏组织经济积累，当事人属从属地位且未参与核心决策\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">关联暴力指控\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">凌晨召集数十人打砸工地房屋门窗，指控情节严重的恶性寻衅滋事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">结合客观轨迹证实部分事件未到场，到场事件未起策划组织作用，应认定从犯\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>财产追索与敲诈勒索的罪非界限\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在董某案中，检方指控的一起核心重罪是敲诈勒索50万元。控方认为，董某等人因竞标未成及施工争议，向发包方索要巨额补偿，系强行索取财物。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">承办律师在查阅财务账册与工程合同时发现，董某等人主观上索要的是前期实际垫付的工程款及机械设备进场成本。虽然在催收手段上采取了拉闸断电、人员聚集等过激行为，但主观上并不具备刑法意义上的“非法占有目的”。更重要的是，涉案资金最终并未进入董某个人账户，其本人既非利益享有者，亦未参与核心决策。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护团队据此提出：民事经济纠纷中的过激索债行为，必须严格与敲诈勒索罪区分开来。目的具有合法性的债权清偿主张，即便催收手段违法，也应当按照其具体违法行为（如寻衅滋事或扰乱社会秩序）单独评价，绝不能将债权主张直接等同于非法占有。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指别人确实欠了你的工程款，你找人去堵门要钱固然违法甚至犯罪，但这是追讨自己的钱，而不是凭空勒索别人的财产，性质有着根本不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>层级责任拆分与从犯认定的实证推演\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在多罪名交织的涉黑案件中，公诉机关往往倾向于让所有涉案人员对组织内的全部罪行承担连带责任。辩护团队采取了细致的“责任拆分”策略。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">针对指控董某参与的重点拆迁工地寻衅滋事，律师通过比对监控录像、通话清单与证人证言，证实案发时董某根本未在现场；而对于其确实到场的另一处工地冲突，律师充分论证其系临时受邀前往、并未动手打人、在共同犯罪中处于被指使的次要辅助地位。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在法院审判阶段，原公诉机关建议的量刑极高。最终，法院完全采纳了辩护人关于董某在多起事实中属于从犯、涉案财产纠纷性质等关键辩解，在参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、敲诈勒索罪等多罪并罚下，从轻判处执行有期徒刑十一年，成功化解了可能面临的顶格重刑风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、涉黑涉恶辩护的深层审判规律与实操心法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在现行司法环境下办理涉黑涉恶案件，律师面对的不仅是纯粹的条文逻辑，更是地方治理、维护稳定与司法审判相互交织的复杂场域。要想取得扎实的辩护实效，必须深刻理解审判机关的心证形成机制。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>认罪认罚与定性抗辩的动态平衡\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">许多涉案当事人往往陷入极端：要么盲目全盘认罪希望换取从宽，结果涉黑罪名被坐实导致总刑期高企；要么对全部指控一概否认，最终丧失了在法定从轻情节上的争取空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在长期的实务探索中，卓安团队总结出一套务实的辩护规律：在大型涉黑案件中，如果对明显存在违法行为的个案采取全面拒不认罪策略，极易激发合议庭的防御性对抗心理，反倒促使法官倾向于确认控方的系统性指控；而如果策略性地承认客观存在的民事违法或普通犯罪情节（如斗殴、阻碍施工），将全案的核心火力精准集中于瓦解“涉黑”的组织特征与非法控制特征，法官在免除“放纵犯罪”顾虑的同时，反而更容易采纳律师关于“脱黑”或“摘恶”的定性意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这种“让出次要阵地、死守定性底线”的做法，往往能在复杂的审判环境中为当事人争取到最优的处理结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>财产甄别是企业与企业家自救的生命线\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及相关司法解释的规定，黑社会性质组织犯罪案件通常伴随着严厉的财产刑，甚至面临没收个人全部财产的判决。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在刘某某案及孙某案中，办案机关在立案初期便对涉案企业的账户、房产以及股东家属的个人财产采取了全面的查封扣押措施。很多企业在案件尚未判决前，就已经因为资金链彻底断裂而陷入瘫痪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">成安博士在总结涉黑财产辩护经验时强调，涉案财产处置绝不能等到审判阶段才被动应对。必须在公安侦查37天黄金期至检察院审查起诉阶段，辩护团队应当迅速调取工商登记、企业审计报告、股东分红决议及家属名下银行流水，向办案机关出具《涉案财产权属审查意见书》并同步申请依法解除查封冻结：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第一，严格区分公司法人财产与股东个人财产，防止将合法的企业经营资产一概认定为黑社会组织的经济依托；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第二，严格区分涉案人员的违法所得与合法家庭共有财产，为案外配偶、子女的生活必需品及合法继承财产提供充分证据支撑；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第三，将涉案时间节点之前的合法原始积累与案发后的涉案收益进行严格切割。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">只有将人身自由辩护与涉案财产辩护同步推进，才能在当事人获得依法轻判的同时，保住企业活下去的微弱火种，为后续重整留出空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉黑涉恶案件的刑事审判，始终处于惩治犯罪与保障人权的深刻张力之中。在常态化扫黑除恶的法治轨道上，司法机关肩负着维护稳定的重任，而辩护律师的职责，正是以理性的法理剖析和严密的证据筛查，防止正常的市场竞争与经济纠纷被标签化、指标化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉黑涉恶案件的严峻态势下，辩护的价值不仅在于对抗不当指控，更在于帮助司法机关在复杂的商业表象与外部压力中精准厘清合法与违法的边界。正如卓安首席律师成安博士所倡导的，穿透式事实梳理与理性的程序监督，才是避免民营企业与普通从业者被误伤的根本路径。面对任何重大案件，坚守法治底线、以客观事实为基石，方能为迷雾中的当事人守住自由与未来的希望。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专案研判支持：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师事务所律师团队\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>学术与实务指导：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 成安博士（卓安律师事务所首席律师、法学博士、原省级公安厅特聘专家顾问）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>协同办案机制：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依托卓安“控、辩、审、学”四维实战研判体系（原法官、原检察官与法学学者集体论证）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>核心业务标签：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 近30年刑事法律实务经验 | 百人级刑事专业律师团队 | 刑事风控与合规 | 刑事危机应对与化解 | 重大疑难刑事案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 20:27:19",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"矿上跟村民起过冲突，老板被按涉黑立案，如何摘掉涉黑“帽子”？ | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","企业主若因行业竞争或民间纠纷被拔高指控为黑社会性质组织首要分子，脱罪核心在于切断“组织特征”与“危害性特征”。关键在于证明成员间无严密纪律与层级管控，涉案行为系偶发纠纷，未在行业形成非法控制。法定特征存在证据断裂时，可依法阻断涉黑定性，促使法院改判普通轻罪。 在涉黑涉恶案件的审查起诉与审判实践中，控方往往倾向于将民营企","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F629",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T20:27:19+08:00","2026-09-22T20:28:44+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fe2e276bf-ac00-475f-9dc4-81fa1c50f7aa.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]