[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-630":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},630,"2026-09-22 20:31:28","矿企自养的保安队被说成“打手队”，这块能跟组织犯罪分开算吗？ | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F37955978-9730-448f-9fb8-eebeeabf9ec7.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">西南地区矿产与建工等民营企业常因厂区维稳组建护卫队，一旦发生持械冲突或私设关卡，极易被办案机关直接拔高指控为组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪。该定性直接决定企业家面临十年以上重刑甚至没收个人全部财产，还是仅按职务侵权纠纷或个案从轻论处。依两高两部涉黑恶指导意见与反有组织犯罪法，涉黑必须具备非法控制与黑规纪律，民间矛盾中雇人护厂不等于黑社会组织。成都刑事律师团队通过穿透审查雇佣劳动属性、区分合法经营积累与违法所得，能有效瓦解组织特征并摘除黑恶定性。家属当下应立即固定企业合法审批资质、保安聘用合同及案发前报警记录，在黄金审查期委托专业律师跟进。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、民营企业设护卫队发生殴打村民与关押事件，办案机关为何极易直接定性为涉黑？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关常因装备齐备、多人参与及多次冲突，推定企业具备武装性和组织性，从而将个案侵权直接拔高为涉黑犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">民营企业因生产经营秩序需要设立保安队，属于常规的企业内部管理行为，但一旦越过法律红线便容易滑向重罪渊源。在四川省、云南省以及贵州省等矿产资源富集区，部分民营矿企、砂石开采企业因经常面临偷采盗运、征地补偿争议或同行竞争，往往招募大量具备前科劣迹的闲散人员组建护卫队。这些队伍往往配备了统一的反恐防暴叉、齐眉钢管、防割手套甚至管制刀具，在进出矿区的必经要道私设地锁与卡点。根据中华人民共和国刑法第二百九十四条规定，黑社会性质组织需具备组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和非法控制特征。在西南地区司法实践中，办案机关面对民企护卫队擅设私牢、扣押车辆、殴打上访村民或竞争对手的事件，倾向于根据统一着装、持有器械、多次作案等外在表象，直接推定该组织具备严密的暴力犯罪层级，进而立案定性为黑社会性质组织犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关产生这种定性倾向，根源于将企业科层制的行政管理与涉黑组织的黑规戒律混为一谈。公诉机关在审视此类案件时，往往重点审查安保团队的资金流向、人员招聘方式以及暴力指令传达链条。一旦发现保安人员的工资奖金直接由公司财务发放，且发生斗殴受伤后由企业出资医治或给予安抚补偿，办案机关就极易认定企业是以商养黑、以黑护商。在一些地方侦查机关形成的定势思维中，护卫队在特定矿区、运输路段形成的封闭排他态势，容易被直接等同于刑法规定的在一定区域或者行业内，形成非法控制或者重大影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">很多涉案企业家与家属陷入了认知误区，误以为只要打人是为了保护厂区财产就不算涉黑。企业主常常向律师辩解，自建护卫队是为了防止矿石被盗，关押小偷和阻拦闹事村民是迫不得已的自保措施，属于企业管理中的职务过激行为。然而根据现行法律规定，企业完全没有执法权，私自设立关卡限制他人人身自由已触犯中华人民共和国刑法第二百三十八条非法拘禁罪；持械聚众驱赶竞争对手则涉嫌第二百九十三条寻衅滋事罪。更为危险的是，如果企业主此前曾向护卫队负责人下达过谁敢闹事就往死里打等概括性指令，办案机关便会将底层人员实施的故意伤害、非法拘禁乃至非法持有枪支行为，全部归责于企业法定代表人或实际控制人，将其锁定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对这种严峻指控，涉案企业及留守高管必须在侦查初期实施差异化的证据自救。在公安机关提请批准逮捕前最长三十天与检察机关审查批捕七天所构成的三十七天法定审查窗口内，必须将辩护重心放在职务行为与涉黑犯罪的证据切割上。家属应迅速协同企业留守管理层，系统性调取公司设立保安部门的股东会决议、企业章程、正规劳务合同、薪酬发放明细表以及考勤打卡记录。重点证明这些保卫人员属于拿固定月薪的普通劳动者，而非基于效忠黑道老大获取非法分红的涉黑成员。与此同时，应全力收集企业在案发前遭遇偷盗、滋扰时多次拨打一一零报警的接处警回执，证实企业组建安保力量的原始意图是防范不法侵害，而非称霸一方为非作恶。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在司法审判实践中，各级人民法院对此类企业涉黑案的定性有着严格的甄别界限。例如四川省高级人民法院在审理涉及矿山秩序纠纷的刑事案件中明确指出，区分企业正常生产经营纠纷中的违法行为与黑社会性质组织犯罪，核心在于审查该团伙是否具备对特定区域或行业的非法控制。如果暴力行为仅仅是针对特定民事争议相对人偶发实施，没有在当地群众中造成普遍的心理恐慌和秩序破坏，坚决禁止人为拔高认定为涉黑涉恶犯罪。这一裁判尺度为涉案民企高管打破涉黑定性提供了强有力的抗辩支撑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、最高人民法院指导判例如何区分企业内部安保违法与黑社会性质组织犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高法院明确要求涉黑必须具备称霸一方的非法控制特征，企业因偶发纠纷雇凶伤害或私力救济，不构成黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">黑社会性质组织犯罪的非法控制特征，是区别于一般共同犯罪或普通企业职务违法的分水岭。根据最高人民法院刑事审判参考收录的涉黑指导判例裁判要旨，认定黑社会性质组织必须具备行为人以暴力、威胁等手段，在一定区域或行业内确立强势地位，使当地群众产生恐惧、恐慌并形成心理强制，严重破坏经济、社会生活秩序。在审理涉民营企业暴力纠纷案例时，最高审判机关一贯强调，如果民营企业雇佣打手仅仅是为了解决具体的土地权属、厂房拆迁或矿权纠纷，其暴力指向的对象具有高度的特定性，并未导致不特定公众的合法权利受到侵害，不得认定为具备危害性特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关在审查企业护卫队案件时，往往需要穿透考量行为的起因与波及范围。公诉机关必须举证证明，该护卫队不仅在企业内部实施管理，更对外形成了欺压残害百姓的恶名，使得合法的公权力受到侵蚀或使行业竞争机制彻底瘫痪。如果证据显示村民、同行在利益受损后依然能够正常向政府信访、向法院提起民事诉讼或向公安机关报案并获得处理，便足以证明国家基层政权运转正常，企业并未形成非法控制。相反，如果地方公职人员长期为企业的暴力护卫行为站台背书、压案不查，则极易触发刑法规定的非法保护特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">许多企业家家属在遭遇指控后，往往简单套用公事公办这一说辞进行辩解，这也是极易被公诉机关推翻的雷区。家属常认为只要所有指令写进了公司保卫处工作条例就不算犯罪，殊不知条例文本中若出现允许对违规人员采取人身约束罚款等字眼，反而会被侦查人员直接采信为黑社会性质组织具备组织规约的铁证。在西南地区某市办理的一起采石场涉黑案中，企业主将护卫队员违反指令扣除津贴违纪罚跪写进保安手册，结果合议庭认定该手册正是黑社会性质组织用以强化内部控制、约束成员的非法家法家规，导致全案涉黑辩护陷入极其被动的境地。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">为了依法打掉涉黑定性，辩护律师与家属在审前阶段必须按照三步法推进证据拆解。第一阶段应全面梳理冲突起因，提供完整的矿权许可证、土地租赁协议、投资招商引资合同，确立企业开展生产经营的合法前置性；第二阶段必须对每一宗被指控的持械殴打或关押案卷进行细致阅卷，梳理冲突现场是否有对方人员强行阻拦施工、聚众破坏生产的先行动作，证明案件起因于民事侵权防御，而非主动寻衅滋事；第三阶段必须通过行业协会、周边企业及村民委员会调取中立证言，证明该矿企从未操纵矿产价格、未垄断运输路线，当地同行业其他企业均依法自主经营，以此正面瓦解非法控制特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查维度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">企业内部违法安保行为（普通犯罪\u002F侵权）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">黑社会性质组织犯罪（刑法第294条）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织纽带\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">基于合法劳动合同、考勤与薪酬发放，具有人员流动性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">存在森严等级、帮规戒律、效忠宣誓，脱离组织受惩戒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">经济特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">收益主要来源于合法的矿山开采、加工与商品销售\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">以违法犯罪为主要获利手段，或将合法经营收益全额用于养黑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为指向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">围绕特定生产界限、资产防盗、民商事履约纠纷展开\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">肆意无事生非、欺压不特定群众，以树立强势组织恶名\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">危害程度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">侵犯特定人的人身、财产权益，社会治安秩序总体受控\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">形成区域霸凌或行业非法垄断，导致当地群众产生心理强制\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">追责路径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">按故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪等具体罪名追究直接责任人\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织者领导者对全部犯罪承担刑事责任，并处没收全部财产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fa9982004-e22b-439c-96d0-2438b8d1f4f3.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、四川卓安律师事务所办理涉矿企涉黑重案时，如何通过四步攻防成功实现全案摘帽脱黑？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护人切断职务雇佣与黑道规约关联，将企业合法资产与涉案财产严格隔离，最终促使法院剔除黑社会定性并大幅改判从轻。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在四川卓安律师事务所承办的一起涉矿产开采重大涉黑专案中，某民营矿业公司董事长刘某被检察机关指控涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪等多项罪名。起诉书指控刘某招募多名具备前科的人员成立护矿队，配备钢管和管制刀具，在进山通道擅自设卡查车，并曾将三名涉嫌盗采矿石的外部人员拘禁在矿山配电房内长达三十小时，期间实施了殴打逼供。一审法院原认定刘某构成涉黑犯罪，数罪并罚判处重刑并处没收个人全部财产。卓安律师团队介入二审后，全面审查全案一百余卷笔录与电子数据，确立了剥离涉黑定性、拆解单罪罪责的核心辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>厂区保安队领工资听调度算不算参加黑社会，如何斩断企业雇佣与黑恶组织的关联？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">企业员工仅领取固定劳动报酬且受公司行政规章约束，缺乏违法犯罪组织的帮规戒律，依法不属于黑社会性质组织成员。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护团队首先将锋芒对准组织特征。公诉机关认定护矿队是黑社会组织的执行分支，核心证据是队员统一食宿并听从调度。卓安律师在庭审中详细出示了全体保安人员的人事入职审批表、社会保险缴纳凭单以及银行流水。证据显示，所有护矿队员每月领取固定工资两千五百元至三千五百元不等，工资标准与当地普通保安市场行情完全吻合，从未参与过任何企业利润分红或涉案赃款分赃。更为关键的是，队员的进出完全遵循民法典与劳动合同法规定的离职程序，不存在任何一旦加入便不得退出否则实施断指打残等黑帮纪律。四川省高级人民法院最终采纳了辩护意见，确认不能将普通企业因用人失察招募有前科人员的雇佣劳动关系，机械推定为黑社会性质组织成员关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>护卫队持械巡逻阻拦商业对手引发私刑，为什么不能等同于称霸一方的非法控制特征？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">企业护卫行为局限在特定厂区且由民事纠纷引发，未对当地行业或群众形成非法控制与心理强制，依法不能认定危害性特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">针对起诉书指控护卫队在矿区形成非法控制的指控，辩护律师展开了缜密的调查反驳。律师团队通过调取自然资源部门地理测绘底图与历年航拍资料，证实发生冲突的区域全部位于该矿业公司的合法采矿权红线范围之内。护卫队设立卡点并盘查过往重型卡车，起因是长期有无证黑车进入矿区偷运高品位矿石，企业曾先后七次向属地派出所和自然资源综合执法大队递交书面报警材料。虽然护卫人员在抓获偷盗人员后擅自羁押、殴打的行为触犯了刑律，但其主观动机是保护企业财产权益，而非为了称霸一方欺压百姓。辩护人指出，该案属于典型的民商事纠纷与治安防卫失当引发的次生犯罪，根本不具备在矿产行业内操纵市场、排除合法竞争的危害性特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>办案机关查封企业全部对公账户与厂房设备，家属怎样依法申请涉案合法财产确权解封？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">家属应向办案机关提交企业合法经营纳税凭证与原始出资证据，依据反有组织犯罪法申请解除对合法经营财产的超额查封。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">财产刑辩护是涉黑涉恶案件中最容易被忽视却关乎企业生死的要害。在刘某一案中，侦查机关最初将企业旗下选矿厂、洗煤厂、对公账户内的六千余万元流动资金以及刘某配偶名下的两套自住房产全部查封冻结。卓安辩护团队依据中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法第四十五条以及两高两部关于黑恶犯罪财产处置的规定，向合议庭提交了长达五十余页的企业财务审计核减报告。律师团队明确将企业设立前的合法家庭资产、合法取得矿权后的正常经营纳税收益，与涉案护矿队的安保开支进行了彻底的会计穿透隔离，证实被查封的企业资产绝非黑金。最终，二审法院依法裁定解除对企业正常生产经营所需流动账户及案外人家属合法房产的查封冻结，并对刘某涉黑犯罪依法予以摘帽，仅按个案故意伤害、非法拘禁数罪并罚改判减轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、企业高管因厂区安保纠纷被警方异地刑拘后，家属在黄金救援期最该办好的四件事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">家属应立即向看守所存物并委托专业刑辩律师会见核实，同步封存企业合法审批与财务台账，切勿盲目信托中间人捞人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当企业家或高管突遭异地公安机关带走并以涉黑涉恶罪名刑事拘留时，家属往往面临极度的恐慌与信息真空。在这一关口，盲目行动往往会导致极为严重的法律后果。涉黑涉恶案件普遍实行跨区域异地羁押与专班办理，家属在案件刚发生的一个月内，必须保持清醒，按照标准化步骤稳妥应对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第一项动作为落实关押信息与保障在押人员生命健康。家属在收到或者未收到拘留通知书时，应第一时间前往办案公安机关法制部门或侦查大队核实羁押看守所的具体名称。核实后应立即凭拘留通知书或近亲属关系证明前往看守所接济窗口为当事人开立账户，存入必要的生活款项并按看守所合规要求送入换季衣物。如果当事人患有高血压、心脏病等需长期服药的慢性疾病，家属必须携带正规三甲医院的近期诊断证明与病历本原件，向看守所驻所医疗机构提交用药申请，确保当事人在羁押初期身体机能稳定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第二项动作为委托专职刑事律师第一时间介入看守所会见。涉黑案件在侦查初期面临着高强度的密集讯问，当事人在缺乏法律指引的情况下，很容易在审讯压力下作出违背事实的妥协性供述，承认自己明知打手犯罪或默认保卫队有特殊规矩。专业律师能够第一时间完成会见，为当事人提供程序法辅导，告知其在面对与客观事实不符的笔录时有权要求修改或拒绝签字，并辅导其如何客观还原企业安保设置的行政属性与民事纠纷前因，为后续的审查起诉阻击战奠定基石。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第三项动作为抢先固化企业内部的免责客观书证。涉黑专案组一旦进驻企业，通常会调阅、扣押全部服务器与财务凭证。家属与企业核心管理层应在合法合规前提下，迅速将企业取得矿业权开采许可证、环评批复、征地拆迁安置补偿协议、全部安保人员的人事档案及银行代发工资流水进行复印并备份封存。特别是在历次厂区冲突中，企业向乡镇政府、派出所提交的反映治安隐患的书面请示、报警记录以及对方违法侵入厂区的监控录像源文件，必须由专人妥善保管，随时准备通过律师向办案机关提交书面证据调取申请。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第四项严正提示为坚决斩断一切托关系走后门的危险念头。涉黑涉恶案件受中央、省级政法机关常态化扫黑除恶机制严格监督，全部实行案件办理终身负责制与违规插手过问案件事实记录制度。实践中充斥着利用家属焦急心理索要巨额所谓捞人费协调费的诈骗犯罪。家属轻信中间人不仅会导致巨额财产被骗，甚至可能因涉嫌行贿罪被立案侦查，彻底丧失合法救济的最佳时机。必须依托公开透明的法律程序与专业的实务证据攻防，才能在严峻的涉黑指控中为当事人赢得公正的裁决。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、涉黑涉恶与职务违法交叉案件中，辩护律师审查起诉与出庭时必须依据的核心法条索引？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护核心在于严守反有组织犯罪法与刑法第二百九十四条四个特征底线，全面援引两高两部关于排除拔高认定的规范性文件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">准确援引国家现行有效的法律、司法解释及规范性文件，是确保辩护意见被检察院与法院审查采纳的法理基石。在办理涉及民营企业自建安保被控黑恶的案件中，辩护人必须依托以下四级权威法律文件展开辩护：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第一位阶法律依据为自2022年5月1日起施行的《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》。该法第二条严格界定了黑社会性质组织与恶势力组织的法律边界，强调黑社会性质组织必须具备刑法第二百九十四条规定的全部特征；该法第四十二条、第四十五条确立了涉案财产查封扣押冻结的严格审查程序，明确规定人民法院、人民检察院、公安机关在办案中必须对涉案财产的性质、权属进行严格甄别，对与犯罪无关的合法财产、被害人的合法财产以及案外人的财产，应当依法及时解除强制措施并予以返还。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第二位阶核心实体法依据为现行《中华人民共和国刑法》及相关修正案。其中第二百九十四条第五款明确规定了黑社会性质组织所必须同时具备的组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和非法控制特征；第二百三十八条为非法拘禁罪条款，重点审查是否具有索赔、民事纠纷事由，以争取第一款三年以下有期徒刑幅度的适用；关于涉案寻衅滋事行为，应重点援引最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕18号）第一条第三款之规定，即行为人因债务等纠纷实施有关行为的一般不认定为寻衅滋事，严格将民事私力救济过激与肆意扰乱公共秩序相区分。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第三位阶为两高两部针对黑恶势力的专门司法规范文件。中华人民共和国最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》（法发〔2018〕1号）第十三条明确规制：在黑恶犯罪认定中，必须坚持法定标准，严禁人为拔高或降格处理；对于单纯为了牟取不法经济利益或为了解决纠纷而雇佣他人实施违法犯罪活动，缺乏明确组织架构与纪律约束的，不应认定为黑社会性质组织。同时，两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕13号）第五条明确规定：因民间纠纷而引发以及在民事纠纷、经济纠纷处理过程中，一方或者双方纠集多人或者雇用打手，采用暴力、威胁或者其他手段扰乱经济、社会生活秩序的，一般不应当认定为恶势力。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第四位阶为涉案财产处置与量刑规范。中华人民共和国最高人民法院《关于刑事裁判涉财产部分执行的若干规定》（法释〔2014〕13号）第十条与第十二条，为被追缴财产案外人提出执行异议提供了法定路径。在涉黑案件量刑指导方面，最高人民法院关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见明确要求，应当严格贯彻宽严相济刑事政策，对在涉黑犯罪中未实际参与核心暴力活动、未获取非法利益的从众，依法必须全面适用从轻、减轻或免予刑事处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【要点回顾与家属行动指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>核实安保定位\u003C\u002Fstrong>：立刻调取护卫队招录合同与薪酬明细，将人员劳动关系与黑帮人身依附彻底切断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>固定纠纷前因\u003C\u002Fstrong>：搜集矿权合法证照、遭盗采侵权的报警记录与监控，力证涉案暴力属于民事私力救济过激，正面打破非法控制与危害性特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>隔离企业财产\u003C\u002Fstrong>：理清企业原始出资与合法纳税流水，依据反有组织犯罪法对办案机关超范围查封的生产经营账户提出书面解除异议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>抢抓黄金窗口\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在公安侦查与审查起诉阶段，第一时间委托专业刑事律师会见并向人民检察院重大犯罪检察部门递交不构成涉黑性质的专项法律意见书。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">本文由卓安律师事务所刑事风控与危机应对委员会出品。卓安为企业及特定人群提供事前刑事合规、事中危机应对的全流程风险管理，下设五个职能中心，并覆盖八大行业风控中心。刑事法律的传播者，刑事风险的管理者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">本文仅供学术与实务交流，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 20:30:02",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"矿企自养的保安队被说成“打手队”，这块能跟组织犯罪分开算吗？ | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","西南地区矿产与建工等民营企业常因厂区维稳组建护卫队，一旦发生持械冲突或私设关卡，极易被办案机关直接拔高指控为组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪。该定性直接决定企业家面临十年以上重刑甚至没收个人全部财产，还是仅按职务侵权纠纷或个案从轻论处。依两高两部涉黑恶指导意见与反有组织犯罪法，涉黑必须具备非法控制与黑规纪律，民间矛盾中雇人护","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F630",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T20:30:02+08:00","2026-09-22T20:31:28+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F37955978-9730-448f-9fb8-eebeeabf9ec7.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]