[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-631":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},631,"2026-09-22 20:33:56","公司派人催自己真实的货款，哪几种催法不会被算成“软暴力”？ | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F0d5c8203-4a9d-4135-a3b4-cdd2e12816fd.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">企业防范涉黑涉恶法律风险，核心在于切断“以商养黑、以黑护商”的指控逻辑。民营企业主必须在商业经营与暴力手段间划清法定界限，杜绝雇用非正式人员以暴力威胁方式催收、占场或排挤对手；同时明晰民事违约与刑事强制边界，规范公司资金流向与组织边界，避免日常商业纠纷因手段越界被司法机关定性为黑恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在全面贯彻《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》的司法背景下，黑恶犯罪的认定标准日趋严格与规范。然而，在诸多涉及矿产开采、建设工程、民间借贷、物业清退等重资产或劳动密集型领域的刑事案件中，仍有民营企业负责人在商业纠纷激化后，面临涉黑涉恶指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办企业为何会滑向涉黑涉恶的指控边缘？商业纠纷中的过激维权，与刑法意义上的黑恶犯罪到底隔着多远的距离？围绕这些关乎企业生存与企业家刑事法律风险的实质命题，我们专访了法学博士、卓安律师事务所首席律师成安。成安博士拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，主持办理过多起复杂涉黑涉恶案件。在这场深度对话中，成安博士立足司法实务与裁判规则，解析商业纠纷、企业治理与刑事定性之间的真实边界。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、认知错位：把商业野蛮生长误当江湖规矩的代价\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专栏记者\u003C\u002Fstrong>：成安博士您好。在您近30年的执业经历中，经手过大量涉黑涉恶案件。许多民营企业老板在被采取刑事强制措施后，往往感到不解，认为自己只是在正常经商、催收欠款、维护经营地盘，为何会被控方指控为黑恶犯罪组织者？这种认知分歧通常是如何产生的？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：这种分歧根源于经营逻辑与刑事法律评价之间的认知脱节。部分涉案企业负责人仍习惯沿用早期的商业博弈惯性，将行业潜规则或江湖习气视为正常的市场手段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>从商事纠纷滑向刑事深渊的隐形轨道\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在办案过程中，这类教训屡见不鲜。例如在卓安律师事务所办理的某河砂开采企业刘某某案，以及涉足拆迁工程的董某案中，当事人在经营初期均属于正常承包商。但在面临恶性竞争、工程款拖欠或项目阻工时，因认为民商事诉讼程序周期较长、执行受限，转而采取了非法律途径施压。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指：当法定维权渠道被弃用时，有人便试图通过社会闲散人员进行私力“平事”。最初往往表现为在现场造势、阻拦施工或断水断电等民事侵权行为；但在尝到所谓“高效维权”的甜头后，协商机制被彻底抛弃，行为方式逐步升级为限制人身自由、聚众滋事乃至强迫交易。在侦查机关的《起诉意见书》中，这些孤立的过激行为便会被因果链条串联，进而被评价为“有组织地多次实施违法犯罪活动”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>企业主最容易忽略的“组织化”证据陷阱\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">许多企业主存在误区，认为只要企业内部没有拜把结派，没有形式上的“帮规戒律”，就绝不可能被认定为犯罪组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">但在司法审判实践中，黑社会性质组织“组织特征”的审查并不拘泥于特定仪式。若企业内部呈现出老板提供资金支持、骨干负责现场指挥、底层人员出面实施滋扰恐吓的层级化分工，且部分违法所得持续用于维持团队运转——在控方的指控逻辑中，这套企业科层制架构极易被直接解读为犯罪组织的层级体系。向参与涉案行为的人员发放薪酬、奖金甚至事后兜底费用，亦常被公诉机关作为认定“以商养黑、维系组织稳定”的客观证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fe84cfb9a-1666-4396-b72b-6b625c3a41df.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、人性与控制：为什么民企老板容易被裹挟进涉黑泥潭\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专栏记者\u003C\u002Fstrong>：您谈到了很多企业是用公司的外壳在运行私人秩序。在商业利益驱使与行业环境作用下，企业管理层通常是在哪些节点丧失了对法律边界的把控？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：核心在于对私人强制力的路径依赖，以及对现代企业治理规则的漠视。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>江湖义气与制度失灵导致的人身依附\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">部分民企老板在创业阶段依赖少数人员拓展市场，在企业步入正轨后，未能及时建立现代人力与风控制度，反而出于信任或义气，继续由这部分人员负责安保、物业腾退、清收账款等高冲突业务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">之所以说这是诱发刑事风险的根源，是因为这些人员往往习惯采用极端手段排除阻力以获取业绩奖赏。当企业主对下属的过激行为知情而未予制止，甚至在事后予以资金奖赏时，这种放任在刑法评价上具有极高危险性。司法机关通常会借此推定实控人与直接行为人之间存在概括性的共同犯罪故意，进而将基层人员的具体犯罪后果归责于企业主。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>“地下秩序”对正常政商环境的反噬机制\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在部分准入门槛高、依赖特许经营的行业，竞争具有明显的排他性。个别企业为建立区域优势，不仅依靠非正规手段排挤同业，还试图寻求非正常的外部庇护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">然而，刑事司法的穿透式审查使得这种平衡极易瓦解。在常态化扫黑除恶的司法环境下，一旦发生恶性事件引发侦查介入，涉案企业以往排挤竞争对手的行为，会被全面梳理并作为涉嫌强迫交易罪、寻衅滋事罪的定罪证据；企业所占据的市场份额，也常被控方指控为《刑法》第294条第5款第（四）项所规定的“在一定区域或者行业内，形成非法控制或者重大影响，严重破坏经济、社会生活秩序”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、司法定性穿透：黑恶定性背后的四大审查边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专栏记者\u003C\u002Fstrong>：从刑事辩护的实务技术层面来看，企业正常的经营冲突、过激维权，与刑法严格意义上的黑恶犯罪到底如何划界？卓安团队在办理此类案件时，主要的审查抓手是什么？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：核心在于回归《刑法》第294条关于黑社会性质组织的“组织特征、经济特征、行为特征、危害性特征”四大法定特征，并结合最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于恶势力犯罪的相关规定展开排查。辩护工作的实质，在于击破控方“拔高认定”的证据逻辑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">二者的法定认定边界对照如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查维度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">正常民商事纠纷及过激维权\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉黑涉恶犯罪法定认定边界\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">辩护中的核心反向推导抓手\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">员工流动符合常态，依劳动合同及规章履职，无严密人身依附与惩戒家规\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">形成稳定犯罪组织，人数众多，有明确的组织者、领导者，骨干成员固定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查劳动合同与社保记录，证明员工系从事本职业务，切断组织层级认定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">经济特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">资金来源于合法经营活动，商业收益归公司或股东个人，受市场规律调节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有组织地通过违法犯罪活动攫取利益，具有支持该组织活动的经济实力\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">穿透《司法会计鉴定意见》，证明主营业务合规性，阻断“以商养黑”评价\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为事出有因（如真实债权债务），手段虽有过激但多属民事侵权或单一轻罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">连续、多次有组织地实施暴力、威胁、“软暴力”等违法犯罪活动\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">紧扣各起纠纷的独立因果链，阻断孤立个案间的意志关联，排除拼凑定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">危害性特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纠纷局限于特定交易相对人，未造成区域行业垄断或公众恐慌心理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">在特定区域或行业内形成非法控制或重大影响，破坏经济与社会生活秩序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">调取市场主体工商数据，证明行业准入与竞争充分，未形成非法行业垄断\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>经济特征中的“以商养黑”如何依法切断\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关在论证涉黑涉恶指控时，常将企业的正常经营收入全盘纳入指控范围，以此论证其具备雄厚的“黑恶组织经济实力”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">对此，卓安团队在辩护中注重推行“资产属性穿透与财产权属剥离”。必须通过专项审计细致核验：企业的注册资金来源是否合法？日常利润是来源于正当商业经营还是非法侵占？支出的薪酬是基于正常的劳务对价，还是专门用于资助违法犯罪活动的非法经费？只要能够证明企业主营业务具备真实合规的商业实质，且不存在专门设立违法资金池的事实，公诉机关指控的“经济特征”便难以成立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>行为特征中的灰色催收与软暴力实质认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">自刑法修正案（十一）增设“催收非法债务罪”（《刑法》第293条之一）以来，索债引发的纠纷定性审查更加细致。很多企业在追索到期工程款或真实借款时，采取了张贴告示、蹲守、跟随等不当手段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">司法审判倾向于严格审查行为的主观目的与基础法律关系。若行为人追索的是客观存在的合法债权，因其主观上不具备非法占有他人财产的目的，依法不构成敲诈勒索罪。在杨某涉嫌恶势力犯罪团伙一案中，检察机关原指控杨某涉嫌聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等罪。辩护团队通过证据质证，促使检察机关在审查起诉阶段撤回了聚众斗殴罪指控；同时向合议庭充分论证，涉案行为系催收引发，应依法适用轻罪定性，从而避免了重罪重罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、反直觉真相：企业“越正规”，为什么反而可能被指控得“越重”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专栏记者\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在实务中是否存在这样一种现象：部分企业主为规避风险，给负责现场清场、催收的人员签订劳动合同、按月发薪、制定考勤制度，甚至统一着装。这在司法审判中是否能起到免责作用？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：这是一个极为常见但认知完全相反的盲区。在审判实践中，若底层行为本身违法，这类形式上的“规范化”非但不能免责，反而往往沦为控方强化涉黑指控的证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指：若团队实施的实质行为是强揽工程、强行占场或滋扰阻工，那么企业签订的劳动合同，在卷宗里就成了证明相关人员系“组织成员”的书面证据；考勤记录与规章制度，会被公诉方指控为犯罪组织的“纪律与规约”；统一配发的制服，会被视作向外界施加心理强制的“恶名外在表征”；而按月发放的工资奖金，则直接对应了“具有维系组织存续的稳定经济依托”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">形式上的合规无法清洗实质违法的行为。当底层手段涉嫌刑事犯罪时，表面的制度越严密，控方在证明《刑法》第294条所要求的“人数众多、骨干成员固定、纪律严明”时就越容易完成证据闭环。企业主在庭审中辩称“他们只是拿工资办事的普通员工”，往往难以对抗控方出示的层级汇报与资金发放证据链条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、理性自救：企业在日常经营中建立法律防火隔离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专栏记者\u003C\u002Fstrong>：既然形式上的包装无法防范实质的法律风险，民营企业在复杂的商业运作中，应当如何从根本上建立远离涉黑涉恶指控的制度防线？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>成安博士\u003C\u002Fstrong>：企业防范涉黑涉恶风险，必须从治理结构到日常履职建立四项刚性规则：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第一，严格禁绝带有强制色彩的自力救济\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">企业内部必须明确红线：涉及账款拖欠、违约清场或权属争议，一律通过协商、仲裁或向人民法院提起诉讼解决。在未取得人民法院生效法律文书及合法执行程序前，严禁擅自实施封堵通道、强行占场、损毁财物或限制相对方人员流动等行为。自力救济一旦越过人身自由与财产权的合法界限，即便享有实体权利，亦极易转化为刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第二，严禁将高风险处置业务交由非正规团队包干\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在房地产开发、拆迁土地整理、矿区开发等领域，切忌通过“大包干”协议将清场、阻工应对等敏感事务转包给社会闲散人员。一旦这些外包队伍在履约中实施故意伤害、寻衅滋事等犯罪行为，公诉机关极易根据合同关系与费用结算凭证，将发包企业及实控人追溯认定为共同犯罪的组织者或指使者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第三，健全公司独立财务，防范资产混同与查封风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉黑涉恶案件中，涉案财产处置往往直接关乎企业存亡。根据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第23条及第45条规定，办案机关对涉黑涉恶财产依法享有查封、扣押、冻结权限。民营企业必须严格规范财务账目，禁止股东个人账户与企业公款混用。规范的审计底稿、合法的完税凭证与明晰的资产权属证明，是在面临刑事查封时，依法向司法机关提出财产异议、申请保护案外人合法财产的核心法理依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第四，建立职务履职合规审核与违法指令阻断机制\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">企业高管在履行职务时，必须恪守合法边界。当实控人要求实施涉嫌强迫交易、毁坏财物、非法限制人身自由的违法指令时，高管应明确表达异议并留存相关书面流转记录；财务与行政部门在处理大额款项调配时，必须附具明确的商务合同与合规凭证，严禁核销名目不清的“协调费”或非正规支出，从而阻断因概括故意被卷入共同犯罪的风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在常态化扫黑除恶的时代语境下，司法的核心价值不仅在于坚决打击破坏社会秩序的有组织犯罪，更在于精准划清民间商事纠纷与黑恶势力的法定界线。正如卓安律师事务所首席律师成安博士所倡导的，刑辩律师的职责，是在法庭上通过穿透式的事实梳理与严密的证据反驳，帮助司法机关剔除那些因政绩冲动或认知误区而被不当拔高的指控，让民营经济的合法产权与企业家的合法权益免受误伤。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">对于企业而言，最好的刑事辩护永远发生在案发之前。摒弃陈旧的江湖思维，敬畏法律对人身自由与公平竞争的刚性保护，将企业的经营活动全面纳入现代法治轨道的约束之下，不仅是每一位民营企业家的立身之本，更是企业在充满不确定性的市场风浪中行稳致远的终极保障。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专案研判支持：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>学术与实务指导：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 成安博士（卓安律师事务所首席律师、法学博士、原省级公安厅特聘专家顾问）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>协同办案机制：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依托卓安“控、辩、审、学”四维实战研判体系（原法官、原检察官与法学学者集体论证）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>核心业务标签：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 近30年刑事法律实务经验 | 百人级刑事专业律师团队 | 刑事风控与合规 | 刑事危机应对与化解 | 重大疑难刑事案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 20:32:19",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"公司派人催自己真实的货款，哪几种催法不会被算成“软暴力”？ | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","企业防范涉黑涉恶法律风险，核心在于切断“以商养黑、以黑护商”的指控逻辑。民营企业主必须在商业经营与暴力手段间划清法定界限，杜绝雇用非正式人员以暴力威胁方式催收、占场或排挤对手；同时明晰民事违约与刑事强制边界，规范公司资金流向与组织边界，避免日常商业纠纷因手段越界被司法机关定性为黑恶犯罪。 在全面贯彻《中华人民共和国反有","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F631",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T20:32:19+08:00","2026-09-22T20:33:56+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F0d5c8203-4a9d-4135-a3b4-cdd2e12816fd.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]