[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-633":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},633,"2026-09-22 20:37:14","园区负责人收商户管理费被定强迫交易，哪些款项是合同里写明的？ | 企业家刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F79f13aca-291d-453b-8f65-4ae7e4e119be.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">物流园与农贸批发市场高管因引入第三方队伍收取进场费并垄断装卸，极易被指控为市霸行霸并升级为涉黑恶与敲诈勒索重罪。该定性直接决定刑期是三年以下轻刑还是十年以上重刑，更是区分合法收益与违法所得的生命线。依据反有组织犯罪法与北京市司法审查尺度，区分企业违规经营与黑恶势力的核心在于是否形成非法行业垄断及高管是否存在暴力授意。专业律师团队通过审查董事会决策记录与承包协议，将外包人员暴力行为切断为实行过限，可依法剥离涉黑恶标签并降格罪名。家属需立即封存园区收费依据、第三方合同样本及现场纠纷处置记录，为律师核减指控金额提供实证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、物流园区收取进场费被指控为行霸市霸，企业高管如何斩断涉黑恶定性？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">高管若未参与暴力且无非法控制意图，应依法定性为企业违规收费而非黑社会组织犯罪，可全案阻断涉黑恶认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在大型农产品集散地与货运枢纽，投资方或市场管理方收取车辆进场费、统筹场内装卸业务，在行政法与民商法范畴多属于违规设卡或涉嫌反垄断调查的民商事侵权行为。一旦发生阻拦货车、强行卸货或驱赶不服从商户等群体性肢体冲突，公安机关侦查部门极易将市场管理架构机械套用为黑社会性质组织的层级架构，将正常进场费评价为涉黑组织的非法保护费，导致法定刑直接从五年以下有期徒刑攀升至十年以上乃至无期徒刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">北京市各级人民法院在审理涉及新发地、大兴及顺义等大型物流集散枢纽的经济纠纷引发刑事案中，对《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条及《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》规定的涉黑组织法定特征审查极其严苛。北京办案机关重点审查涉案企业是否在一定区域或行业内形成了非法控制或重大影响，是否严重破坏了正常的经济、社会生活秩序。如果市场内商户仍享有自主进出选择权，或者高价装卸仅局限在特定自营作业区，未达到对区域流通市场的实质垄断与非法控制，北京司法实务中坚决禁止将民营企业管理纠纷拔高定性为黑恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">家属和涉案人员最容易陷入的认知误区，是认为只要没有亲自去现场打砸推搡，挂名高管就能自然免责。办案机关在梳理资金流向与组织汇报关系时，往往依据高管在审批单上的签字、在管理群内的指令，直接推定高管与现场暴力催收人员存在共同故意，进而将高管直接指控为黑社会性质组织或者恶势力犯罪集团的组织者与领导者。这种忽视民营企业分级授权与公司法人治理结构的客观归罪，是涉案高管面临刑事打击的最主要原因。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在侦查阶段的黄金三十七天内，辩护律师必须分步推进工作。第一步是向北京市各看守所申请面对面会见，核实企业内部权限分配与现场涉案人员的劳动隶属关系；第二步是全面梳理园区收费立项批复与物业服务合同，证明进场费包含场地清扫、地磅称重、车位调度等管理成本，阻断非法占有目的的主观推定；第三步是向北京市人民检察院分院及区级人民检察院承办检察官提交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，力争在审查逮捕环节摘除黑恶定性，阻断批捕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在北京市第二中级人民法院审理的一起特大批发市场纠纷案中，裁判文书明确指出，涉案管理公司虽存在指使安保人员违规强收管理费并引发多次推搡的情形，但涉案公司系依法注册设立的企业法人，收费主要用于园区运营维护，且未通过暴力手段形成对该区域粮油批发行业的非法控制，最终依法未认定为黑社会性质组织，对涉案多名高管均以强迫交易罪判处三年以下有期徒刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F8fec8a42-d2ff-4a95-b455-e2e22cf88536.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、从最高人民法院指导判例看边界，农贸市场强推服务怎样避免被定性为黑恶？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高法院判例明确，缺乏组织纪律且未控制区域经济的普通违规经营，严禁拔高认定为黑恶势力犯罪集团。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕11号）明确规定，恶势力是指经常纠集在一起，以暴力、威胁或者其他手段，在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动，为非作恶，欺压百姓，扰乱经济、社会生活秩序，造成较为恶劣的社会影响，但尚未形成黑社会性质组织的违法犯罪组织。恶势力犯罪集团还必须具备较为固定的组织形态，有明确的首要分子，重要成员较为固定，且具有一定的组织纪律或不成文规约。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">司法实践中审查涉黑涉恶犯罪的核心，在于区分单纯的为追求经济利益而实施的违法犯罪与以称霸一方为目的的组织犯罪。最高人民法院在相关指导性案例的裁判说理中着重强调：市场经营管理单位因经营权纠纷、租金争议，或者为获取更高商业利益，在经营过程中虽有纠集他人实施强买强卖、寻衅滋事等行为，但行为人并不具有在一定区域或行业内形成非法控制、确立强势地位的意图与客观表现，其经济活动主要是基于真实交易或依附于合法经营实体的，不应认定为黑社会性质组织犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">许多涉案企业高管在出事后，错误地向办案人员交代称涉案保安和搬运工是公司养着的打手，甚至为了显示企业威慑力而承认自己有统一市场规矩。在口供笔录中一旦承认了存在听话给钱、不听话开除、惹事公司出面平事的行规，便恰好印证了涉恶犯罪集团的不成文组织规约这一关键构成要件，导致原本可以通过行政处罚或一般共同犯罪结案的事情，被直接定性为恶势力犯罪集团的首要分子。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对审查起诉阶段的指控，专业律师团队需要通过三份关键证据链完成控方指控阻断。首先调取市场租户流动数据与货车进出地磅流水，证明被指控垄断期间仍有大量外部货车正常作业，以此否定非法控制与称霸一方的危害性特征；其次调取高管与第三方劳务外包公司的独立劳务承揽合同，证明劳务人员工资由外包公司自主核发，企业与劳务人员不存在人身隶属关系与帮规戒律；再次申请调取历次商户警情处置记录，证明历次纠纷均为偶发民事经济争执且已由属地派出所依法调解处理，不属于无事生非的涉恶违法活动。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在最高人民法院《刑事审判参考》第1142号指导案例裁判说理中，审判机关明确认定：被告人虽组织多人在物流集散中心强行承揽卸货业务并引发冲突，但其主观目的在于争夺货运劳务市场份额，获取的款项全部为劳务对价并用于支付工人工资，并未通过暴力威胁在当地货运行业形成非法垄断，全案依法排除涉黑恶认定，仅按普通强迫交易罪追究刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、参考亲办重案剥离涉黑辩护经验，高管如何将敲诈勒索降格为强迫交易？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">基于真实服务基础且有物价备案的收费，主观上不具备非法占有目的，应依法将十年以上重罪降格为轻罪强迫交易。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>高管未直接参与现场打砸，能否以缺乏主观故意切断黑恶组织特征？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">可以。外包人员打砸属于实行过限，高管无指令即无共同故意，可依法打掉恶势力犯罪集团的组织者认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在物流园区管理中，投资方与高管通常负责整体规划与经营核算，现场治安、车辆疏导及货物搬运多外包给专业安保公司或装卸工程队。当外包团队为了自身经济利益，在执行清退违规停放车辆或催收进场费过程中私自采取打砸车辆、殴打司机的暴力手段时，刑法理论与司法实践均将其归入实行过限范畴。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在四川卓安律师事务所承办的陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案中，律师团队通过穿透审查全案卷宗发现，案涉团伙虽实施了聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等行为，但内部并无法定纪律规约与组织利益分配，纯粹依赖松散的雇佣与利益纽带维系。卓安律师坚决抓住组织特征缺失这一核心辩点，向法院论证当事人对现场过激行为缺乏共同犯意联络，最终法院完全采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名，仅对陈某以轻微普通犯罪判处有期徒刑一年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>指定装卸价格明显高于市价，能否以民事商业纠纷阻断敲诈勒索定性？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">可以。只要实际提供了搬运装卸服务，即便溢价严重也属于强买强卖，应定强迫交易罪而非敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">敲诈勒索罪要求行为人具有非法占有公私财物的目的，且被害人交付财物完全是出于恐惧而未获得任何对价。而在大宗农产品批发市场中，商户支付的费用对应了实际的货物卸车、分拣、堆码以及仓储空间占用服务。虽然由于特定人员把控现场，导致服务价格明显高于场外市场价格，商户丧失了自主选择装卸队伍的交易自由，但在客观上该行为完全符合《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十六条规定的强迫他人接受服务，应当依法认定为强迫交易罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在北京市司法实践中，敲诈勒索罪数额巨大起算标准为六万元，涉案金额达到四十万元以上即可判处十年以上有期徒刑；而强迫交易罪即便属于情节特别严重的情形，法定最高刑也仅为七年有期徒刑。在卓安律师事务所承办的杨某涉恶案件中，侦查机关原指控聚众斗殴与寻衅滋事强拿硬要等多项重罪，辩护律师深入论证了涉案行为具有基础民事纠纷前提，促使检察机关在审查起诉阶段撤回聚众斗殴指控，并在审判阶段精准化解罪名竞合，最终数罪并罚仅判处有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>园区正常租金与涉案收费混同，怎样通过财务穿透避免企业资产被全额没收？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">必须委托审计剥离合法租金与争议进场费，证明公司日常运营资金合法性，依法保全企业正常生产经营资产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关在查处涉黑涉恶及市霸专案时，往往采取先冻后查的查控模式，对物流园所属母公司、关联公司的所有对公账户、高管个人账户以及市场租金收入进行一刀切式的查封与冻结，直接导致整个物流园区资金链断裂，数千商户面临断供歇业风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉黑涉恶专案辩护不仅是对人身自由的辩护，更是对涉案财产的法律保全。卓安律师在办理大量重大涉黑恶案件中发现，涉案财产辩护的关键在于启动司法会计审计与资金穿透审查。必须通过调取市场投资建设审批文件、银行贷款合同、商铺租赁协议，精准计算出企业合法经营投入与正当租金收入占比，将争议性较强的进场费与装卸溢价款从整体营业收入中剥离出来，依法向办案机关提出解除超范围查封冻结的书面异议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为类型与指控罪名\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">客观行为核心特征\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">主观目的与对价关系\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">北京地区法定刑幅度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心辩护切入点与策略\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">违规行政收费\u002F民事侵权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">园区设置进场道闸，按车辆规格收取场站调度费与保洁费\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">基于园区物权与管理成本，具有公示性与收费依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不构成刑事犯罪，由市场监督部门处以行政罚款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">提交发改委或物价备案材料，证明属民事纠纷出罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">强迫交易罪（自首\u002F从犯可轻判）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">强推自营装卸队，指定高于市价的搬运服务并限制外来队伍\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">违背相对人意愿，但实际提供了对应劳动装卸对价\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">情节严重处三年以下；情节特别严重处三年至七年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明存在真实劳动支出，阻断敲诈勒索非法占有目的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">敲诈勒索罪（重罪防线）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无任何服务与对价，强行按车次索要保平安性质的保护费\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无任何实质服务，纯粹以暴力威胁强索他人财物\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">涉案超六万处三年至十年；超四十万处十年以上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查涉案资金是否包含场地使用费，打掉纯索财定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织黑社会性质组织罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纠集人员打砸排挤竞争对手，长期控制区域货运与农产品价格\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">称霸一方，确立非法权威，对行业形成实质非法垄断\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织领导者处七年以上有期徒刑，最高可处无期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">严格比对四大特征，重点审查是否达成行业非法控制\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、面对侦查机关全面查扣市场资产，当事人家属当务之急要做好哪四件事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">家属应立即全面封存园区经营审批账目、外包合同及现场录像，配合律师向办案机关申请解除合法财产查封冻结。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第一，依法封存并备份园区全部行政审批及经营台账。家属应迅速协同企业留守管理人员，全面封存园区设立批复、土地使用权证、建设规划许可、工商税务登记证照以及物价部门的报备说明文件。重点梳理近三至五年的车辆出入地磅电子记录、商户正常缴纳的摊位租赁合同与银行转账凭单，严防服务器数据因办案机关扣押主机而灭失，为后续证明企业系依法开展正常生产经营提供不可动摇的客观书证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第二，梳理并隔离外包劳务合同与高管管理指令痕迹。家属需搜集所有涉及第三方装卸队、外包装卸承包协议、现场物业保安劳务派遣合同。仔细筛查高管的日常办公电子数据、微信工作群聊天记录及会议纪要，重点核查高管是否曾多次在工作例会中明确要求外包队伍文明执勤、严禁动手打架、发生纠纷必须报属地公安调解。这些正面指令是切断高管与现场打砸人员共同犯罪故意、论证实行过限的最有力证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第三，协调专业律师在三十七天侦查黄金期完成全面会见与权利救济。在犯罪嫌疑人被刑事拘留后的前三十七天，是决定是否批准逮捕的关键分水岭。家属切忌轻信各类托关系捞人的骗局，应当委托专业刑事律师前往北京各看守所进行羁押会见。律师将在会见中核对侦查机关讯问重点，全面解答企业高管涉嫌罪名的构成要件，指导当事人如何实事求是地陈述公司审批决策流程与涉案款项真实去向，并向办案机关依法递交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》与《羁押必要性审查申请书》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第四，聘请专业审计团队启动涉案财产甄别并提出保全异议。当事人家属应当在专业律师指导下，主动梳理被冻结账户资金来源结构。根据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第四十五条之规定，查封、扣押、冻结涉案财产，应当严格区分违法所得与合法财产、企业法人财产与个人财产、犯罪嫌疑人个人财产与家庭成员财产。家属应依法向办案机关提交财产权利证明，对超范围查封的企业基本户及家庭成员合法财产依法提起执行异议与返还申请。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、现行有效法律与北京法院裁判依据，哪些关键法条能为当事人争取轻判？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">依据反有组织犯罪法及北京高院裁判尺度，缺乏暴力故意与组织层级的高管，依法可争取不予批捕或罪轻量刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在办理涉案人员众多的物流园专案中，律师必须熟练运用以下现行有效的法律、司法解释以及北京市地方实务规范：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第一，《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二条对恶势力组织作出了严格界定，要求恶势力组织应当具备经常纠集在一起、多次实施违法犯罪活动、具有一定组织性等特征。辩护人可依据该法条，结合企业各部门之间仅为平行的民事聘用关系、人员流动频繁且无纲领规约的客观事实，论证涉案单位不具备黑恶势力的组织特征。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第二，《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十六条关于强迫交易罪的规定，以及第二百七十四条敲诈勒索罪的立案与量刑标准。北京市高级人民法院《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》实施细则明确规定，敲诈勒索罪数额较大的起点为四千元，数额巨大的起点为六万元，数额特别巨大的起点为四十万元；而强迫交易罪情节严重的起点通常为交易数额二万元至十万元。精准切断非法占有目的，推动罪名向强迫交易罪降格，是量刑大幅降低的关键法定路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第三，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理黑社会性质组织犯罪案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕11号）明确指出，严禁将企业在合法经营过程中因合同纠纷、经济摩擦引发的民商事违法违规行为随意拔高为黑社会性质组织犯罪。对于民营企业在发展壮大过程中存在的不规范行为，应严格遵循罪刑法定原则与疑罪从无原则，依法保护民营企业产权和企业家合法权益。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">第四，最高人民法院发布的恶势力犯罪相关典型裁判观点明确指出，组织成员实施的未经组织策划、授意、默许且违背组织宗旨的个人违法犯罪，不应计入该组织的违法犯罪事实；在追究组织者、领导者刑事责任时，应当严格限于其策划、指挥、授意实施的犯罪行为以及在其预见范围内的行为。对于现场外包劳务人员自行扩大的肢体冲突与财物毁损，不得由未在场且无授意的高管承担连带刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>要点回顾\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当大宗农产品批发市场或物流园区高管因强收进场费、垄断装卸业务涉嫌市霸犯罪被采取强制措施时，家属切莫惊慌失措。当务之急是封存园区经营批复、收费公示及现场工作群指令，切断外包人员暴力打砸的刑事责任连带；严格区分真实劳务对价与无端勒索，推动涉黑恶与敲诈勒索重罪向强迫交易罪定性降格；同时依法开展司法审计，申请解除对企业合法生产经营账户与家庭财产的超范围冻结，全力在三十七天审查逮捕期内争取不予批捕或大幅从轻处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">本文由卓安律师事务所刑事风控与危机应对委员会出品。卓安为企业及特定人群提供事前刑事合规、事中危机应对的全流程风险管理，下设企业刑事风控、反舞弊与内部调查、监察留置应对、危机处置与证据保全、行刑衔接风险阻断五个职能中心，并覆盖国有企事业单位、建工矿产环境、大健康与食药、证券私募股权投融资、财税涉税、知识产权、教育行业、互联网电商物流八大行业风控中心。刑事法律的传播者，刑事风险的管理者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">本文仅供学术与实务交流，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 20:36:32",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"园区负责人收商户管理费被定强迫交易，哪些款项是合同里写明的？ | 企业家刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","物流园与农贸批发市场高管因引入第三方队伍收取进场费并垄断装卸，极易被指控为市霸行霸并升级为涉黑恶与敲诈勒索重罪。该定性直接决定刑期是三年以下轻刑还是十年以上重刑，更是区分合法收益与违法所得的生命线。依据反有组织犯罪法与北京市司法审查尺度，区分企业违规经营与黑恶势力的核心在于是否形成非法行业垄断及高管是否存在暴力授意。专","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F633",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T20:36:32+08:00","2026-09-22T20:37:14+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F79f13aca-291d-453b-8f65-4ae7e4e119be.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]