[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-635":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},635,"2026-09-22 20:41:47","被查出手术中加价，医院被说成是“恶势力”，怎样才能判得最轻？ | 医药刑事风控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fbc51b112-fcab-48c7-91da-affec8a8ed31.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">民营医疗机构因术中加价与人身限制被立案，投资人与高管极易被直接拔高认定为恶势力犯罪集团及敲诈勒索重罪。能否阻断涉恶定性并厘清主从责任，直接决定刑期是数罪并罚面临十年以上重刑，还是争取轻缓乃至不起诉。依据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及两高两部涉恶意见，恶势力集团必须具备严格的组织架构与主观故意，严禁将一般违规过度诊疗一律扩大化认定。在四川司法实务中，辩护人通过逐案核验网络引流、门诊与手术台各环节的指令链条，重点审查是否存在脱离主观明知的拔高定性。家属当下应紧急调取并固定医院原始出资记录、各部门职责管理制度、各科室真实处方病历及工资提成台账。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在各地针对民营医疗专科领域的专项整治中，公安机关对网络导流、虚构病情、术中强行加价及限制患者离院等行为的打击力度空前。实践中，侦查机关往往将整座医院的组织架构直接套用为涉恶组织模型，从实际控制人、科室主任到一线医护人员实施全链条刑事拘留，并以强迫交易罪、敲诈勒索罪、诈骗罪数罪并罚移送起诉。面对公诉机关来势汹汹的指控体系，涉案企业家、高管及其家属必须迅速切换至专业诉讼防御视角，在关键法定程序节点内采取精准救济动作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Ffd9ef489-3fad-4f3f-9721-bfe5b086ee7c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、投资人未直接参与一线接诊与手术，会被直接认定为恶势力犯罪集团首犯吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">未参与一线诊疗不代表能免责，若参与制定加价指标并以此主导利益分成，极易被直接推导为犯罪集团首犯。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>首要分子与主观明知的认定边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关在审查民营专科医院涉嫌恶势力犯罪集团案件时，并非以投资人是否身穿白大褂进入手术室为标准，而是聚焦其对违法犯罪活动是否存在组织、策划与指挥行为。依据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第二十三条以及最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕13号）第十一条的规定，恶势力犯罪集团是指由三人以上为共同实施违法犯罪活动而组成的较为固定的犯罪组织。集团的首要分子，必须是对该组织起组织、策划、指挥作用的犯罪分子。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">控方构建首要分子指控的逻辑链条，通常是从涉案资金最终回流至股东账户出发，逆向推定投资人明知并纵容了一线医生的违法手段。在四川司法实践中，如果投资人或者挂名管理人员仅仅按出资比例获取合法的企业分红，并未设立针对患者的诱导过度医疗方案，也没有下达术中必须二次加价的硬性考核指标，依法不能当然认定其为首要分子。很多实际出资人因长期在外地经商，将医院全权承包或委托给职业经理人管理，若卷宗证据能够证明其对一线医护人员采取创口暴露、威逼加价的犯罪手段缺乏主观明知与概括故意，辩护人应重点从组织特征和主观明知层面展开阻击，坚决打掉恶势力犯罪集团首要分子的指控标签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>类案裁判逻辑与首犯责任穿透\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">司法审判对隐身于幕后的实际控制人审查极为严密。四川省内江市市中区人民法院审理的内江九五医院涉恶犯罪集团案中，被告人黄某某通过承包涉案医院，指使他人代其直接管理，任用无资质人员虚构病情、在手术台上利用患者处于创伤状态逼迫交钱，法院最终认定以其为首的组织构成恶势力犯罪集团，依法严惩首要分子，判处其有期徒刑十九年。贵州省遵义市红花岗区人民法院审理的遵义汇川欧亚医院恶势力犯罪集团案中，总经理韩某某同样未直接从事一线门诊手术，但因其在内部制定严密话术体系、主导分成激励并设立安保阻拦机制，同样被依法认定为首要分子，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑二十年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">上述裁判逻辑表明，要将投资人从恶势力首要分子中剥离出来，核心在于切断其与底层违法犯罪手段之间的主观故意关联。普通民营医院具有法定的科室划分、早会晨会与企业绩效考核体系，辩方必须举证证明上述制度系基于民营医疗机构合法的法人治理模式运行，绝非犯罪集团的黑恶戒条与组织纪律。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>家属应紧急核实保存的证据清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>医院设立初期的合伙协议、工商登记档案及真实的隐名代持出资流水凭证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>历次股东会决议、董事会纪要，重点核查是否包含严禁虚假宣传与违规行医的内部合规批复。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>医院承包经营合同或职业经理人聘用协议，厘清日常诊疗业务的实际决策人与管理边界。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>财务分红明细账单，证实个人收益是否与各科室具体违法加价项目挂钩。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>投资人对相关经营纠纷向院部下达的内部整改通报、行政处分记录及邮件往来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、手术中途停刀加价以及保安阻拦患者离院，构成强迫交易还是敲诈勒索罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">门诊虚构病情定诈骗，术中创口暴露威逼加费定敲诈勒索，若未达心理强制仅属价格违法则争强迫交易。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三个罪名的核心定性界限\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">术中加价案件在定性上常伴随强迫交易罪、敲诈勒索罪与诈骗罪的竞合。在行为拆解上，三个罪名对应不同的实施节点：网络客服与门诊导医利用虚假检验报告虚构病情、诱骗患者接受手术，属于典型的使人陷入认识错误而交付财物，触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百六十六条规定的诈骗罪；而在手术过程中，主刀医生故意割开创口、利用患者身体暴露且极度恐惧的特殊处境，以不给钱就停止缝合或病情将迅速恶化为要挟，迫使患者或家属临时增加数千元至数万元费用，此时行为已完全突破平等自愿的交易属性，属于以恶害相通告排斥意志自由，依法构成《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百七十四条规定的敲诈勒索罪；如果医院确有真实诊疗基础且存在手术适应症，仅因未严格遵守价格公示、在术中单方推销高价耗材且未对患者施加生命健康威胁，则应当全力争取往《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十六条规定的强迫交易罪降格。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">四川省高级人民法院、四川省人民检察院川高法〔2014〕40号文件《关于我省敲诈勒索罪数额认定标准的通知》规定，敲诈勒索公私财物价值四千元以上不满六万元的，为数额较大；六万元以上不满四十万元的，为数额巨大；四十万元以上的，为数额特别巨大。而在诈骗罪方面，四川省适用的数额标准分别为五千元、五万元与五十万元。强迫交易罪情节严重的法定刑为三年以下，情节特别严重的法定刑为三年以上七年以下；而敲诈勒索与诈骗在数额巨大或特别巨大档次下，法定刑最高可达十年以上有期徒刑乃至无期徒刑。更为严峻的是，依据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理敲诈勒索刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（法释〔2013〕10号）第二条第五项规定，若被认定以黑恶势力名义敲诈勒索，数额达到数额巨大基准六万元的百分之八十即可升档判刑。罪名定性直接决定了涉案人员量刑档次的根本分水岭。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>涉案行为定性与四川司法实务审查标准对照表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指控罪名\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">客观行为表现\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">四川省数额与情节基准\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">最高法定刑\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心辩护切入点\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">强迫交易罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">确有真实诊疗基础，以阻拦离院、言语纠缠等方式迫使患者接受超标检查或高价耗材\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">情节严重处三年以下，情节特别严重处三年以上七年以下\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有期徒刑七年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明具有真实的手术适应症与合规执业资质，未达到剥夺意志自由的程度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">手术创口暴露状态下，以停刀不予缝合、任由流血恶化相要挟，强索高额新增项目费用\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数额较大为四千元，巨大为六万元，特别巨大为四十万元\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有期徒刑十年以上乃至十五年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查加价项目是否属于患者签署知情同意后的必要扩大切除，核减敲诈勒索总额\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">诈骗罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">篡改化验数据，无病说有病、轻症说重症，诱骗患者交付大额门诊检查与预付手术费\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数额较大为五千元，巨大为五万元，特别巨大为五十万元\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明检验指标存在临床医学解释空间而非凭空伪造，剥离正常诊疗合规收费\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>家属应紧急核实保存的证据清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉案科室的原始纸质门诊处方单、化验室生化指标仪器自动导出的底层数据日志。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>各案涉手术的手术记录单、麻醉记录单及术中知情同意书签署的时间戳与笔迹记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>手术室内及外围通道的原始无剪辑监控录像，核实是否存在保安限制人身自由的物理动作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>医院向当地卫生健康行政主管部门、医疗保障部门报备并公示的各项医疗服务收费价目表。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉案科室向退费或投诉患者出具的调解协议书、退赔银行转账底单及患者书面谅解凭证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、医院网络客服与普通护士仅拿提成，会被认定为恶势力犯罪集团骨干成员吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">底层受雇医护若不具有决策权且不参与提成分配，依法应认定为从犯，情节轻微的可争取不起诉或缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>涉案层级拆解与宽严相济政策\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">恶势力犯罪集团内部通常呈现金字塔式结构，办案机关在收网初期往往倾向于将所有涉案人员列入集团成员。两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》第十二条明确强调，认定恶势力犯罪集团的重要成员，应当综合考量其在组织中的地位、作用，其必须多次积极参与集团活动或者起主要作用；对于受雇佣、不参与决策且仅领取固定工资或少量业务提成的一般人员，不应一律作为集团成员追究刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在医疗涉刑案件中，医托、网络咨询客服、检验人员、接诊护士等群体，本质上属于拿取劳动报酬的工薪阶层。许多年轻从业者并不了解医院管理层的全盘设计，仅是将上级下发的营销话术模板当成日常工作执行。甘肃省临夏市人民检察院在办理涉及六家民营医院的恶势力犯罪集团案件时，对涉案的七十三名被告人准确划定打击面，对其中十四名受雇担任普通辅助工作的医护人员，鉴于其犯罪情节轻微、处于从属地位且自愿认罪认罚，依法建议公安机关变更为取保候审措施，并在后续程序中落实宽缓化处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>黄金三十七天内的精准切割路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在公安机关刑事拘留后的三十天侦查羁押期与检察院审查批捕的七天期限内，辩护律师必须抢抓时间节点，向同级人民检察院审查逮捕部门递交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》。对于网络客服，重点审查其是否具有篡改检验单据或下达手术加价指令的权限，若其仅负责线上邀约且对后续手术台上的敲诈行为完全不知情，其主观犯意仅能及于前端的民事引流或轻微诈骗，坚决阻断其对后阶段敲诈勒索与非法拘禁的共犯责任。对于参与手术的辅助护士或巡回护士，重点审查其是否属于遵从医嘱履职，有无参与现场语言威胁与价格商谈。只要将当事人的行为界定为辅助性、遵从性动作，就能依据刑法从犯条款争取不予批捕、不起诉或缓刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>家属应紧急核实保存的证据清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>员工入职登记表、劳动合同、岗位说明书以及单位打卡考勤表。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>入职以来的全部工资银行卡交易流水，证明收入构成为固定基本工资加常规考核，未参与核心非法利润分红。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>当事人所使用的工作手机、电脑登录账号及日常交接班工作记录。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>院方统一印发并强制推行的话术培训手册、考核试卷，证实其系被动接受管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>个人执业护士证、助理医师证或各类技术资格证书复印件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、涉案医院账户被全面查封，投资人家庭合法财产与正常科室收入如何申请解冻？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关查封不得超范围扣押，家属应聘请审计机构分科室核算，依法就合法资产及家庭财产提请异议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>涉案财产查控红线与申诉控告程序\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在办理涉恶犯罪案件中，打财断血是侦查机关的常规动作，但在实务中极易出现超范围查封、划扣合法财产的倾向。《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第四十条明确规定，公安机关、人民检察院、人民法院在办理有组织犯罪案件中，应当严格区分违法所得与合法财产、本人财产与家庭成员财产，不得违法查封、扣押、冻结与案件无关的财产。在侦查与审查起诉阶段，如果办案机关超范围查封案外人财产或合法收益，家属与辩护人应当直接依据《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百一十七条的规定，向作出查封决定的侦查机关或同级人民检察院提出书面申诉与控告。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">对于涉案的综合性民营医院，并非所有科室都存在术中加价或违法欺诈行为。很多医院的口腔科、内科、中医科或体检中心属于正规执业科室，其门诊挂号收入、正常药品进销差价及医疗设备属于合规经营收益。侦查机关在实务中往往根据全案总流水直接出具《冻结存款决定书》，甚至将投资人配偶婚前购置的房产与未成年子女的教育保险一并查封。案件进入审判阶段后，家属与辩护人必须依据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第四十五条规定，向人民法院申请启动涉案财产法庭调查程序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>穿透司法审计与资产核减策略\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公诉机关在指控诈骗与敲诈勒索金额时，所依赖的司法会计鉴定意见书往往存在致命漏洞，即机械地将涉案医院对公账户和关联个人商户号的全部进账简单汇总为犯罪数额。辩护人介入后，应重点从三个维度击破审计结论：第一，申请调取医院全部科室的分项财务账目，将非涉案科室的合规营收予以剥离；第二，核减正常医疗过程中实际发生的药品、血液制品及耗材采购成本，依据司法解释精神，诈骗数额必须扣除真实的对价给付成本；第三，将医保统筹基金合规报销结算部分从敲诈勒索数额中剔除。通过精准穿透审计，最大限度降低认定的涉案金额，为解冻个人合法财产并争取从轻量刑筑牢根基。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>家属应紧急核实保存的证据清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>医院各科室独立的收支明细账册、医保合规结算单据及第三方正规审计报告。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>被查封房产、车辆的原始购置合同、按揭贷款还款流水及契税完税凭证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>投资人配偶名下银行账户在涉案时间段之前的合法收入证明、婚前财产协议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>未成年子女的保险合同、直系亲属看病就医及基本生活保障资金流水凭证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉案发生前历年医院缴纳企业所得税、增值税的完税证明与股东分红纳税凭证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>要点回顾\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对民营医疗机构涉嫌恶势力犯罪集团与敲诈勒索等重罪指控，当事人及家属应恪守以下关键行动准则：\u003Cbr>第一，在公安机关刑事拘留后的黄金三十七天内，通过梳理企业法人治理结构，坚决阻断办案机关将医院行政管理拔高认定为恶势力犯罪集团的指控逻辑；\u003Cbr>第二，在罪名定性上精细拆解各环节行为，将门诊引流、术中处理与离院阻拦逐一对应法条，力争将全案定性从敲诈勒索等重罪向强迫交易等轻罪转化；\u003Cbr>第三，对基层医护人员坚守从犯地位与从属性特征，抢抓审查批捕与审查起诉窗口，争取不予批捕、相对不起诉或缓刑；\u003Cbr>第四，严格对抗办案机关全量流水推定的司法审计漏洞，依据刑事诉讼法第一百一十七条与反有组织犯罪法第四十五条及时提出涉案财产异议，保全家庭合法财产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cem>本文由卓安律师事务所刑事风控与危机应对委员会出品。卓安为企业及特定人群提供事前刑事合规、事中危机应对的全流程风险管理，下设五个职能中心，并覆盖八大行业风控中心。刑事法律的传播者，刑事风险的管理者。\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cem>本文仅供学术与实务交流，不构成正式法律意见。\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cem>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fem>\u003Cbr>\u003Cem>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 20:40:41",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"被查出手术中加价，医院被说成是“恶势力”，怎样才能判得最轻？ | 医药刑事风控 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","民营医疗机构因术中加价与人身限制被立案，投资人与高管极易被直接拔高认定为恶势力犯罪集团及敲诈勒索重罪。能否阻断涉恶定性并厘清主从责任，直接决定刑期是数罪并罚面临十年以上重刑，还是争取轻缓乃至不起诉。依据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及两高两部涉恶意见，恶势力集团必须具备严格的组织架构与主观故意，严禁将一般违规过度诊疗","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F635",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T20:40:41+08:00","2026-09-22T20:41:47+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fbc51b112-fcab-48c7-91da-affec8a8ed31.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]