[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-862":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":197,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":299,"serviceTags":300,"serviceCategories":301,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,132,139,147,152,157,162,167,172,179,184,188,192],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},679,"X某涉嫌毒品犯罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减少罪名认定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Ff48b1248-9e8e-4e41-9878-594db86d4c37.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖、 制造毒品罪 ， 非法持有毒品罪 ， 容留他人吸毒罪 结果： 法院采纳部分辩护意见， 主犯死刑 改判死缓，三名 从犯 获大幅减刑 亮点： 成功推翻非法持有毒品罪指控，减少罪名认定 揭示关键物证","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},678,"Z某涉嫌单位行贿罪、串通招投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fac43f3a8-ed7b-4975-848a-06cd1b6528a5.png","【案情简述】 2019年至 2021年期间，某科技股份有限公司法定代表人Z某为感谢时任石嘴山市某局党组书记、局长F某(已判决)在某科技股份有限公司承揽石嘴山市某监管项目、污染源企业全过程监管项目(一期和二期)及工程款拨付等方面提供的帮助，以","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},677,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","一、【案情简述】 嫌疑人D某于14年至18年期间在成都某建筑公司担任业务员，主要工作内容为代表公司与相关招标代理人、实际施工人等沟通、拉业务同时代表公司参与各建设项目的招投标工作，并代公司收取相应的借用资质费、招投标资料费等费用。2021年",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":35,"caseTypeName":137,"caseTypeCode":138},676,"H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师成功辩护，获减轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fedab7283-e35c-409b-8122-2c6c9fe1283e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：参加黑社会性质组织罪（变更涉恶）、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪 结果： · 成功将“黑社会性质组织罪”变更为“恶势力犯罪集团”； · 敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪指控被法院驳回； · 寻衅滋事罪仅认定","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":142,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},675,"F某涉嫌帮助信息网络罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，撤销案件","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4b71eb76-73b9-4634-8468-3b4fdc258de4.png","【案情简述】 当事人涉嫌帮信罪被移送审查起诉，家属到律所委托代理，办案律师担任当事人审查起诉阶段的辩护人。 【办案过程】 受委托人的委托，办案律师多次会见当事人，在会见时详细的了解了案情概况，梳理了案件脉络，并对委托人就当事人近况进行了简短",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},674,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F4bc54bd5-530f-4571-bb91-b1764056f10c.png","一、案情简介 2021年7月，嫌疑人Z某接到其朋友Y某电话，声称想借用其银行卡过几笔钱用于购买比特币，同时可以给予其一些报酬。Z某因碍于朋友情面且因可以获得一些报酬于是就爽快答应了朋友Y某的请求。随后其朋友Y某利用Z某的银行账户、手机银行等",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},673,"Z某某帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师辩护，获得轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F6a14490f-6000-4231-b1bc-b6b7e49896e1.png","一、【案情简述】 检察机关指控：2021年至2022年期间，F某（已判）从事虚假几份兑换商城，委托被告人z某某提供技术。T某于2021年9月开始加如与F某某共同经营。经营模式：由Z某某架设一个虚假积分商城，F某某T某通过联系短信运营商群发虚",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":160,"summary":161,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},672,"X某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F7cb8848d-9acb-4179-bb2d-9d97da88c122.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果：判处有期徒刑九个月（已扣除先行羁押6日），罚金五千元。 亮点： 1. 成功认定自首情节，依法从轻处罚 2. 通过详实的证据链反驳“主观明知”推定，避免更重量刑 3. 针对",{"id":163,"title":164,"thumbnail":165,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":144,"caseTypeName":145,"caseTypeCode":146},671,"Ｈ某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获不批捕并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F71406e62-2a27-46bb-b2da-b2d62c69d2c4.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带的人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},670,"M某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在批准逮捕后最终获得适用缓刑的量刑建议并取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002Fdda305e0-6546-4f71-9536-2bef2b87fbf4.png","一、案情简介 涉及上亿资金的虚拟币投资平台，M某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪被检察院批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},669,"W某涉嫌贪污罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F26\u002F59efab79-758e-4ba5-8c49-a30e75e5d97d.png","一、【案情简述】 2019 年4月，被告人S某通过朋友介绍认识了被告人Z某，S某以能源集团收购加油站负责人的身份，提出能源集团收购J加油站的意向，并提出如收购完成，能源集团领导将从套取的资金中收取好处费人民币 500万元(以下未标明币种的均","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":180,"title":181,"thumbnail":182,"summary":183,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全",{"id":185,"title":186,"thumbnail":10,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":10,"summary":191,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":193,"title":194,"thumbnail":195,"summary":196,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":177,"caseTypeCode":178},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",[198,201,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":178,"name":177,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":138,"name":137,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":144,"code":146,"name":145,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,287],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":289,"city":290,"caseType":291,"title":292,"thumbnail":293,"content":10,"publishTime":294,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":295,"lawyers":296},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[297],{"id":289,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":295,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":298,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[302,307,312,317,322,327],{"id":40,"createdAt":303,"updatedAt":304,"deleted":31,"code":305,"name":306,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":308,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":311,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":313,"deleted":31,"code":314,"name":315,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":316,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":321,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":144,"createdAt":323,"updatedAt":324,"deleted":31,"code":325,"name":326,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":415},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":407,"thumbnail":408,"content":409,"publishTime":410,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":411},862,"2026-10-16 15:17:02","被告人在法庭上穿什么？坐哪里？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F16\u002F864b15f0-7651-4b2b-a72e-a5b6678b2045.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">走上法庭的那一刻，当事人的衣着与坐席，就是“无罪推定”的第一道防线。成安律师结合近30年刑辩实务，深度解析庭审物理环境如何作用于法官心证，并为家属与律师提供一份守护当事人庭审尊严的实操指南。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">很多家属在看守所外苦等了几个月，直到开庭那天，才终于在法庭上见到了日思夜想的亲人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">但仅仅一眼，许多家属的心理防线就瞬间崩溃了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">原本精明体面的一个人，剃着短寸、面容憔悴，缩在松垮破旧的衣服里，被法警押进法庭中央的栅栏内，有些甚至在落座受审时仍戴着手铐。还没等公诉人宣读起诉书，那种扑面而来的“罪犯感”，就已经把人压得抬不起头。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">作为一名执业近30年的刑事律师，我见过太多这样的场景。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">很多人以为，被告人上法庭穿什么衣服、坐在哪个位置，只是走个过场的程序小事，案件最终只看证据。但近30年的办案经验告诉我：庭审的视觉呈现，从当事人迈入法庭的第一秒起，就已经在悄然影响裁判者的心理天平，甚至直接关系到辩护权的实质行使。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>01\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>从“黄马甲”到“便装出庭”，一件衣服背后的法治破冰\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在2015年以前，国内绝大多数刑事被告人出庭时，都是剃着光头、套着看守所的识别服（俗称“号服”或“黄马甲”），戴着手铐坐在法庭中央的铁笼或栅栏里。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">打破这一惯例的催化剂，是十多年前一场备受关注的庭审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在2014年底开庭审理的江西南昌大学原校长周文斌案中，出庭受审的周文斌发现自己套着看守所的橘黄色马甲，与法庭上其他身着制服或正装的人员格格不入，给人一种强烈的“自带原罪”感。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在2015年1月的庭审中，周文斌当庭提出抗议：为什么电视上那些落马官员和娱乐明星受审时都能穿便装，而自己却必须穿着这样的“黄马甲”？在要求更换服装未果后，他索性当庭自行脱下了号服，坚持穿便装受审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这就是轰动一时的“当庭脱号服”事件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">就在这一事件发生一个多月后，2015年2月，最高人民法院与公安部联合下发《关于刑事被告人或上诉人出庭受审时着装问题的通知》，明确规定：人民法院开庭时，刑事被告人或上诉人不再穿着看守所的识别服出庭受审；看守所应当将穿着正装或便装的在押人员移交法院。该通知特别强调，穿正装或便装出庭，既不需要当事人主动申请，也不需要任何机构或个人批准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">2016年修订施行的《中华人民共和国人民法院法庭规则》第十三条进一步将此确立为刚性规范：刑事在押被告人或上诉人出庭受审时，着正装或便装，不着监管机构的识别服。人民法院在庭审活动中不得对被告人或上诉人使用戒具，但认为其人身危险性大，可能危害法庭安全的除外。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">至此，延续数十年的“穿囚服受审”正式退出了历史舞台。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F16\u002Fb3906ced-3c35-4343-b127-84c2a168fe80.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>02\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>为什么穿什么、坐哪里，能悄然左右案件的走向？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">为什么一件衣服、一副手铐这么重要，乃至于最高司法机关要专门发文予以规范？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">因为我国《刑事诉讼法》第十二条写着现代法治最核心的基石之一：“未经人民法院依法判决，对任何人都不得确定有罪。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这就是无罪推定原则。既然被告人在法院作出生效有罪判决前，在法律上仍属于无罪之人，那么法庭的物理环境与视觉符号，就绝不能让他看上去“已经是个罪犯”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">法官和人民陪审员也是普通人，同样难以完全免疫“第一印象”的心理暗示。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在我们卓安律师团队中，有一位曾任中级人民法院刑庭副庭长、并曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草的前法官。他曾坦言：当一个人穿着带有强烈监管烙印的衣服、神情局促地站在栅栏后面时，哪怕裁判者在理智上不断提醒自己“无罪推定”，潜意识里也很难真正把他当成一个完全平等的诉讼主体来倾听。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这种心理暗示在实务中是极其微妙且致命的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">以我们常办的企业家涉经济犯罪或职务犯罪案件为例：如果当事人胡子拉碴、穿着看守所里洗得发黄变形的旧T恤、踩着看守所的塑料拖鞋或简陋布鞋走上法庭，整个人透着一股颓败与狼狈，那么当他在法庭上陈述复杂的“商业逻辑”或“正常经营行为”时，其话语的分量与可信度就会在无形中打折。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">相反，如果他换上一身合体平整的便装或正装，干净清爽、不卑不亢地坐在那里，他的精神面貌本身就在向法庭传递一个强烈信号——“我是一个守规矩的经营者，我在严肃、体面地为自己作无罪或罪轻辩护。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">正如美国联邦最高法院在经典的“埃斯特尔诉威廉姆斯案”中所指出的：被告人的服装很可能在整个审判过程中持续产生不当影响；大法官布伦南亦在该案中深刻阐明，可识别的囚服不仅剥夺了被告人与其他审判参与者同等的尊严，更会在裁判者眼中给他打上一种明确的“犯罪标记”，从而侵蚀无罪推定的根基。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>03\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>号服脱掉了，但那个孤立的“囚笼”为什么还在？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">相比于已经明令解决的“去号服化”，法庭上的“坐席位置”，则是我国刑事司法改革中一块尚未完全啃下的硬骨头。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在当今大多数法治发达国家和地区，让被告人与辩护律师并肩或邻座受审，早已是通行惯例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在德国、韩国的刑事法庭，被告人席直接设置在辩护律师席旁（位于法官台一侧，与检察官席面对面），以此强化辩护方的整体性，保障被告人在庭审中随时与律师低声沟通的实质辩护权；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在美国、日本的刑事法庭，同样强调“控辩平等武装”与平面化对抗，美国刑事正式庭审中，被告人无论是否处于羁押状态，通常均与辩护律师同坐于辩护席，防范任何不当的视觉孤立污染裁判心证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">而在我国，传统的刑事法庭一直沿用“法官居中高坐、控辩两侧相对、被告人单独居于法庭中央”的“四方格”布局。中国社会科学院法学研究所研究员刘仁文曾指出：将被告人席单独居中的传统设置，明显带有暗示被告人“有罪”的意味；被告人依然被视为“审问对象”，孤立的被告席更像一种提前施加的惩罚工具，让被告人一进入法庭，就陷入强烈的羞辱、自卑与心理压迫之中。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">事实上，国内司法机关并非没有意识到这一问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">早在上世纪末至本世纪初，我国各地法院在审理未成年人刑事案件时，便推行了“圆桌审判”（或U型台布局），撤掉铁笼与栅栏，让法官、检察官、辩护人、法定代理人与未成年被告人围坐一桌，极大地消除了法庭的压迫感。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">而在成年人刑事审判中，2014年，河南新郑法院在审理一起刑事案件时，也曾尝试打破传统的“四方格”布局：开庭前，法警不仅让被告人脱去黄色号服、解下手铐，还在审判长指令下，将其直接引导至辩护律师身旁并肩就座。这场中国司法史上首次由基层法院在刑事普通程序中让被告人与律师“同桌受审”的实践，一度拉开了国内法庭坐席由“四方格”变“三角形”的试验序幕，此后浙江宁波镇海等地法院也曾跟进试点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">遗憾的是，十多年过去，“与律师同桌受审”至今仍停留在局部探索阶段，尚未在全国成年人刑事法庭中普及。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">作为长期奋战在一线的刑辩律师，我比任何人都清楚那个“孤立席位”对庭审实质化的伤害：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">被告人本人，才是辩护方真正的主角。在高强度的庭审对抗中，当事人独自坐在法庭中央，直面公诉人的凌厉讯问与各方审视，极易产生高度紧张甚至大脑空白。有时公诉人抛出一个关乎定罪量刑的关键问题，或者当事人突然想起一个能反驳指控的重要细节，他哪怕想转头跟几米外的辩护律师商量一句，受限于法庭空间隔离与法庭纪律，都是不可能完成的任务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">而本该为他提供即时法律帮助的辩护律师，也无法随时附耳提醒，只能在公诉人讯问完毕后，经审判长许可，“隔空”向自己的当事人发问——在视觉和空间上，辩护律师甚至被迫成了“合作审问”的一方。辩护方的整体性一旦在物理空间上被割裂，庭审的实质对抗与防卫效果便会大打折扣。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>04\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>走上法庭前，家属和律师如何帮当事人守住尊严底线？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">虽然我们无法在一朝一夕间改变所有法庭的建筑布局，但在现行法律框架下，尽力为当事人争取最大的体面与程序公正，依然大有可为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">结合日常办案经验，我向所有涉案当事人家属与刑辩同行提出以下三点实操建议：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第一，家属送衣：既要合体得体，更要懂看守所的“安检规矩”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>开庭前，家属应配合律师为在押当事人准备好合身的便装或正装，千万不要让当事人穿着看守所里破旧或印有监管标识的衣物出庭。在准备衣物时，有两个极易被忽视的实务细节：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>严守安检红线\u003C\u002Fstrong>：通过看守所日常窗口送入监室的衣物，\u003Cstrong>绝对不能带有金属配件、拉链、抽绳、皮带以及任何材质的纽扣（包括硬塑料扣，防止被磨尖自伤或吞食）\u003C\u002Fstrong>。否则看守所出于监管安全会直接拒收，或剪掉抽绳与扣子，导致衣服无法穿着。日常送衣建议优先选择挺括合身的纯色圆领\u002FV领套头针织衫、无扣翻领套头衫，搭配松紧腰无扣休闲长裤；若因案件重大确需穿带扣衬衫、西装或夹克出庭，则不能走日常监室送衣通道，需提前通过辩护律师向看守所或承办法官、法警队申请，作为“开庭专用衣物”在提押出庭前专门换穿。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>色彩与版型选择\u003C\u002Fstrong>：避开过于刺眼的亮色、浮夸的图案，同时避免全身纯黑带来的沉重压抑感，优先选择藏青、浅灰、米白、浅蓝等色调。这类色彩在视觉心理学上最能传递沉稳、理智与诚恳的信号。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第二，律师履职：把着装与戒具的沟通工作做在开庭前\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>穿便装出庭、在庭审活动中原则上不使用戒具，是《中华人民共和国人民法院法庭规则》第十三条赋予被告人或上诉人的法定权利。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>庭前主动沟通优于当庭抗议\u003C\u002Fstrong>：对于非暴力犯罪或明显不具有人身危险性的案件，辩护律师最好在庭前会议或开庭前一天，主动与承办法官、法警沟通，提前确认当事人的着装更换安排，并依法申请在庭审活动中解除手铐等戒具。把工作做在前面，既能顺畅解决问题，又能避免当庭交锋引发不必要的审辩对立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>当庭温和而坚定地维权\u003C\u002Fstrong>：若开庭时发现当事人仍违规穿着看守所识别服，或在无明显人身危险性的情况下仍被佩戴手铐受审，辩护律师应当在法庭调查开始前，依法向审判长提出异议，明确援引《人民法院法庭规则》第十三条申请当庭纠正，用法律武器帮当事人挺直腰杆。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第三，庭前辅导：帮当事人做好心理建设与微表情管理\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr>在开庭前的最后一次看守所会见中，除了核对庭审发问提纲，律师一定要对当事人进行出庭礼仪与心理辅导：\u003Cbr>提醒当事人步入法庭时步伐稳健，不要因急于寻找旁听席上的家属而东张西望（极易招致法警训斥，瞬间破坏心理状态）；落座后保持腰板挺直，倾听公诉人宣读起诉书或回答讯问时，切忌出现抖腿、频繁搓手、冷笑或双手抱胸等动作——这些不经意的肢体语言，在裁判者眼中极易被解读为心理防备过重、态度轻佻或缺乏敬畏。唯有神态专注、表达清晰、不卑不亢，才能让自己的辩解获得最大的尊重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">意大利刑法学家贝卡利亚在《论犯罪与刑罚》中写过：“在法官判决之前，一个人是不能被称为罪犯的。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当事人在法庭上穿什么、坐在哪里，看起来是程序的细枝末节，但正是这些细节，定义了司法对待一个具体的人的方式。同时，我也始终怀着强烈的期待与呼吁：希望在不久的将来，我们的每一个刑事法庭都能真正撤掉中央孤立的被告席，让当事人坐到辩护律师身边，彻底撕掉身上的“有罪”标签。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当一个人穿着得体的便装，不戴戒具，不再被关在冰冷的“囚笼”里，而是与自己的辩护律师并肩而坐时，其实是法庭在用行动告诉他：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">你虽然被指控，但你还没有被定罪；你有权与你的辩护律师站在一起，你值得被有尊严地对待。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">我想，这才是现代法治应该拥有的底色。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F16\u002Fd18be8fd-148c-4b44-aca4-2ec21b7d52a5.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-16 15:15:56",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":412,"name":413,"icon":414,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":416,"description":417,"keywords":32,"canonical":418,"image":408,"jsonLd":419},"被告人在法庭上穿什么？坐哪里？ - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","走上法庭的那一刻，当事人的衣着与坐席，就是“无罪推定”的第一道防线。成安律师结合近30年刑辩实务，深度解析庭审物理环境如何作用于法官心证，并为家属与律师提供一份守护当事人庭审尊严的实操指南。 很多家属在看守所外苦等了几个月，直到开庭那天，才终于在法庭上见到了日思夜想的亲人。 但仅仅一眼，许多家属的心理防线就瞬间崩溃了。","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F862",[420],{"@context":361,"@graph":421},[422,429],{"@type":423,"@id":418,"url":418,"headline":407,"description":417,"datePublished":424,"dateModified":425,"author":426,"publisher":427,"articleSection":413,"inLanguage":366,"image":428},"NewsArticle","2026-10-16T15:15:56+08:00","2026-10-16T15:17:02+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F16\u002F864b15f0-7651-4b2b-a72e-a5b6678b2045.png",{"@type":430,"itemListElement":431},"BreadcrumbList",[432,435,437],{"@type":433,"position":6,"name":434,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":433,"position":38,"name":413,"item":436},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":433,"position":35,"name":407,"item":418}]